SCT in Parkinson’s Disease and Atypical Parkinsonian Disorders

Version	Summary	Created by	Modification	Content Size	Created at	Operation
1		Carlo Colosimo	--	1747	2023-03-02 03:17:06	\|
2	format correct	Conner Chen	-2 word(s)	1745	2023-03-06 06:19:59	\| \|
3	format correct	Conner Chen	+ 14 word(s)	1759	2023-03-08 01:37:16	\|

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/biomedicines11020505

Stem cell-based therapies (SCT) may hold greater promise in the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders, such as Parkinson’s Disease (PD), atypical parkinsonian disorders (APD). Initial randomized trials, particularly in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) have been promising, but further research is required to determine the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of this novel approach.

movement disorders stem cell therapies neurodegeneration

1. Introduction

Neurodegenerative disorders result from a complex interplay between genes and environment. Due to their complexity and our limited understanding of the underlying pathological mechanisms, modelling these diseases in the laboratory has proven to be extremely challenging. Many cell and animal models have provided important mechanistic insight into neurodegenerative diseases but, thus far, there is a disconnect between therapeutic successes in animal models and those in clinical trials in humans.

Human stem cells (pluripotent and multipotent) are increasingly being studied as models or therapies for human disease. In most cases, stem-cell based therapies (SCTs) for neurodegenerative disorders rely on replacing lost cell types (e.g., replacing degenerated cells with new ones), thus exerting a symptomatic therapeutic effect. However, while cell replacement may provide rescue and neurorestorative effects, it is likely that disease-modification should rely on precision medicine approaches, matching molecular therapies to biological subtypes of disease. Within the precision medicine approach, which involves combination of multi-drug treatments, rather than a monotherapy, SCT may play a significant contribution in the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders ^[1].

Over the years, there has been significant hope that SCT would lead to curative therapies in these diseases, but unfortunately, that has not been observed thus far. It can be proposed that, unless it addresses the inciting etiology, which is expected to vary among affected individuals, it will never be completely curative. However, with the recent development of newer and more effective cell lineages, differentiation processes, and grafting techniques, the once-imagined regenerative utopia may still be possible. Many review articles have been written on the possible utilization of stem cell therapies in various animal models and/or in patients with dementia, but very few have specifically discussed this topic in patients with movement disorders ^[2]^[3]^[4]^[5]^[6].

Stem cells can be classified on their intrinsic ability to differentiate into the end organism ^[7]. There are five main categories of stem cells: totipotent, pluripotent, multipotent, oligopotent, and unipotent (Glossary). Stem cells can also be categorized as embryonic stem cells (ESCs)—cells derived during early development—and adult stem cells— rare, undifferentiated cells present in many adult tissues ^[8]. Special attention has been given to pluripotent ESCs, which can differentiate into any embryonic cell; initial trials required harvesting it at the blastocyte stage, but, in 2007, induced adult pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) were artificially reprogrammed back from human fibroblasts or blood cells ^[9]. The ability to develop iPSCs, a non-embryonic source of multipurposed cells, was a breakthrough that avoided many ethical pitfalls as they can be derived from the patient’s own cells (e.g., autologous stem cells), and they avoid the risk of immunological rejections that are associated with non-autologous or heterologous stem cells ^[10]. Mesenchymal cells derived from the mesoderm and neuroectoderm were initially obtained from bone marrow; common sources now include adipose tissue, placenta, and umbilical cord, and they have the ability to differentiate into cell types from all three embryonic layers ^[11]. Interestingly, they can grow towards inflammation through the expression of chemokine receptors, making it an attractive candidate for cell loss, secondary to inflammatory conditions ^[12]. Totipotent cells are infrequently used in research as they are difficult to isolate and, once again, ethical questions arise. The above provides a simplified description of these categories to understand the following concepts.

2. Parkinson’s Disease

Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative syndrome which results in a loss of dopaminergic neurons, leading to nigrostriatal degeneration ^[13]. The pathogenesis of neuronal degeneration in PD likely involves the polymerization of alpha-synuclein, with a subsequent loss of normal, soluble synuclein and degeneration. As such, PD belongs to the category of “synucleinopathies” ^[14]. While serotonin and acetylcholine are involved to some extent, the mainstay of therapy has always been and continues to be dopamine replacement ^[15]. The loss of dopaminergic neurons is mainly located in the substantia nigra (SN)-pars compacta and its projections to the striatum. SCT cannot address the disease-causative mechanisms but can replace dopaminergic-producing cells.

Stem cell transplants in PD started in the mid-1990s, with variable results. Olanow et al. showed that fetal stem cell transplants could improve motor symptoms (as measured by the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)-part III) up to 9 months after the transplant, and that this effect was not maintained at 12 or 24 months (e.g., primary endpoint not met) ^[16]. This transient improvement in UPDRS scores coincided with the duration of immune-suppressant post-transplant, suggesting a loss of the transplanted tissue. This was more evident in patients with somewhat less severe PD (UPDRS-III score < 49) when compared to those with more advanced PD (UPDRS-III score > 49). Overall, PD patients in early SCT trials had a range of responses; from no response, disabling dyskinesias (mainly due to heterogeneous fetal grafts containing both dopaminergic and serotonergic cells) to discontinuation of oral levodopa medication, it was hard to predict how patients would respond ^[17]. Failure of these trials was attributed to factors like including non-motor predominant patients, insufficient amount of transplanted tissue, older age, and more diffuse loss of dopaminergic neurons. Those who had dopamine neuronal loss, restricted to putamen, benefited more from this treatment ^[18]. A few encouraging single case reports have suggested that if the graft survives after immune-suppression discontinuation, and patients are properly selected, the effects of transplanted dopaminergic-producing cells could be tangible up to 20 years after the transplant ^[19]^[20]. However, these are observations based on single cases and it is hard to generalize their effect. Additionally, after decades of failures of SCT in PD ^[18]^[21]^[22]^[23], experts tried to review and devise new strategies for clinical trials. TRANSNEURO is a current, ongoing multicenter trial that involves implantation of allogenic human iPSCs-derived into the putamen and addresses some of these past limitations ^[23]. Preliminary data at 36 months on 11 subjects suggests the absence of disabling dyskinesias, continued deterioration of motor signs per Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III, lack of evidence for association between disease duration and clinical outcomes, and no major cognitive problems ^[23]. Separately, Aspen Neuroscience (ANPD001) has started recruitment for their autologous, iPSCs-derived SCT for idiopathic PD. It will avoid the need for immunosuppressants but does come at the cost of developing personalized individual cell lines for each individual. The feasibility of this approach has already been demonstrated in a single patient in whom PET imaging showed graft survival and a 6% reduction of levodopa requirement at 24 months ^[24].

Currently, there are fifteen ongoing clinical trials on parkinsonism and SCT. Out of these, thirteen deal specifically with PD, suggesting that momentum continues within this field. Limitations have included choosing the right stem cell source, creating a cost-effective process to derive cell lineage in sufficient quantities, proper patient selection (currently restricted to motor-predominant and levodopa-responsive individuals in “earlier” stages), appropriate placement of the graft with verification of synapse connection to host networks, and finally, ensuring the longevity of grafts. Of interest, ongoing pre-clinical and phase I trials are mainly using iPSCs or ESC, whereas phase II trials also use mesenchymal stem cells (MSC).

3. Atypical Parkinsonian Disorders

Atypical parkinsonian disorders (APD) are a broad number of conditions with PD-like phenotypes and include MSA, PSP, CBS, and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) ^[25]. APD are primarily characterized by the combination of parkinsonism with additional motor and non-motor features that are beyond the “classical” spectrum of idiopathic PD, with a more aggressive disease progression. From a pathophysiological standpoint, APD consist of the “synucleinopaties”, such as MSA and DLB (with the common hallmark of soluble α-synuclein loss with corresponding insoluble α-synuclein accumulation), and “tauopathies” (characterized by soluble tau loss with corresponding insoluble tau accumulation), which include PSP and CBS ^[14]^[25]. The main studies exploring the effects of stem cells in APD are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Main studies exploring stem cell treatments in patients with atypical parkinsonian syndromes.

Condition	Study Name	Phase	Number of Patients	Intervention	Design	Adverse Events	Follow-Up	Outcome
MSA-C	Lee et al., 2012 ^[26]	I	33	IA or IV MSC	2 arms vs. placebo	Small ischemic lesions in IA	12 m	Slower decrease in UMSARS
PSP-RS	Giordano et al., 2014 ^[27]	I	25	IA BM-MSC	Placebo-controlled crossover	Small ischemic lesions	18 m	Slower decrease in UPDRS; increased FDG-PET uptake
PSP	Canesi et al., 2016 ^[28]	I	5	IA BM-MSC	1 arm	NA	12 m	Stable rating scales
MSA (n = 4), PSP (n = 5), CBS (n = 2)	Pezzoli et al., 2008 ^[29]	I	11	IV GCSF	1 arm	None	3 m	UPDRS not worsened significantly

BM-MSC, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells; CBS, corticobasal syndrome; GCSF, granulocytes colony-stimulating factors; IA, intra-arterial; IV, intravenous; m, months; MSA-C, MSA-cerebellar type; MSA, multiple system atrophy; MSC, mesenchymal stem cells; n, number; NA, not assessed; PSP-RS, PSP-Richardson’s type; PSP, progressive supranuclear palsy; RS, Richardson syndrome; UMSARS, Unified MSA Rating Scale. Single case reports are not included in the present table.

MSA. Studies on stem cells in MSA patients have suggested a putative transient disease-modifying role of stem cells ^[30]. However, these studies have been conducted in a small number of patients (mainly MSA-cerebellar subtype and not on MSA-parkinsonian subtype) and in single centers, and without a double-blinded approach, implanting intravenous or intraarterial MSC ^[26]^[30]. These studies have not been followed by others on wider number of patients and other MSA subtypes; additionally, some of these studies have been published more than a decade ago without further confirmation studies ^[26], thus suggesting limited applications of stem cells for MSA patients. Furthermore, as multiple systems and cell types are affected in MSA, different cell types may be needed for a stem-cell based therapeutic approach in this condition ^[31].

PSP. It has been documented in PSP that bone marrow MSC can be safely used with a possible beneficial effect (or, at least, with stabilization of disease progression), after having excluded the placebo effect ^[27]. The rationale of MSC in PSP is not to replace diseased neurons, but rather to minimize the consequences of neural cell deterioration by using stem cells as treatment ^[28]. Single-case reports have documented encouraging results with intraarterial autologous adipose tissue-derived MSC ^[32] and umbilical cord blood stem cell transplantation ^[33] in patients with PSP.

CBS and DLB. Studies specifically conducted in patients with CBS and DLB are lacking. Only one case series has been found describing the outcomes of the intravenous administration of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) (which stimulates the differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells) in patients with MSA, PSP, and CBS (n = 2). Patients with CBS showed improvement (n = 1) or stability (n = 1) in motor scales over the study period (3 months), but no follow-up was available ^[29].

References

Espay, A.J. Your After-Visit Summary-May 29, 2042. Lancet Neurol. 2022, 21, 412–413.
Pacheco-Herrero, M.; Soto-Rojas, L.O.; Reyes-Sabater, H.; Garcés-Ramirez, L.; de la Cruz López, F.; Villanueva-Fierro, I.; Luna-Muñoz, J. Current Status and Challenges of Stem Cell Treatment for Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2021, 84, 917–935.
Guttikonda, S.R.; Sikkema, L.; Tchieu, J.; Saurat, N.; Walsh, R.M.; Harschnitz, O.; Ciceri, G.; Sneeboer, M.; Mazutis, L.; Setty, M.; et al. Fully defined human pluripotent stem cell-derived microglia and tri-culture system model C3 production in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 2021, 24, 343–354.
García-León, J.A.; Cabrera-Socorro, A.; Eggermont, K.; Swijsen, A.; Terryn, J.; Fazal, R.; Nami, F.; Ordovás, L.; Quiles, A.; Lluis, F.; et al. Generation of a human induced pluripotent stem cell-based model for tauopathies combining three microtubule-associated protein TAU mutations which displays several phenotypes linked to neurodegeneration. Alzheimers Dement. 2018, 14, 1261–1280.
Lines, G.; Casey, J.M.; Preza, E.; Wray, S. Modelling frontotemporal dementia using patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 2020, 109, 103553.
Karch, C.M.; Kao, A.W.; Karydas, A.; Onanuga, K.; Martinez, R.; Argouarch, A.; Wang, C.; Huang, C.; Sohn, P.D.; Bowles, K.R.; et al. A Comprehensive Resource for Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Patients with Primary Tauopathies. Stem Cell Rep. 2019, 13, 939–955.
Adami, R.; Bottai, D. Spinal Muscular Atrophy Modeling and Treatment Advances by Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Studies. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2019, 15, 795–813.
Prochazkova, M.; Chavez, M.G.; Prochazka, J.; Felfy, H.; Mushegyan, V.; Klein, O.D. Chapter 18—Embryonic Versus Adult Stem Cells. In Stem Cell Biology and Tissue Engineering in Dental Sciences; Ajaykumar Vishwakarma, P.S., Shi, S., Ramalingam, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; pp. 249–262.
Zhang, X.; Hu, D.; Shang, Y.; Qi, X. Using induced pluripotent stem cell neuronal models to study neurodegenerative diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2020, 1866, 165431.
Omole, A.E.; Fakoya, A.O.J. Ten years of progress and promise of induced pluripotent stem cells: Historical origins, characteristics, mechanisms, limitations, and potential applications. PeerJ 2018, 6, e4370.
Ferroni, L.; Gardin, C.; Tocco, I.; Epis, R.; Casadei, A.; Vindigni, V.; Mucci, G.; Zavan, B. Potential for neural differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Adv. Biochem Eng. Biotechnol 2013, 129, 89–115.
Hernández, R.; Jiménez-Luna, C.; Perales-Adán, J.; Perazzoli, G.; Melguizo, C.; Prados, J. Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells towards Neuronal Lineage: Clinical Trials in Nervous System Disorders. Biomol. Ther. (Seoul) 2020, 28, 34–44.
Uwishema, O.; Onyeaka, H.; Badri, R.; Yücel, A.N.; Korkusuz, A.K.; Ajagbe, A.O.; Abuleil, A.; Chaaya, C.; Alhendawi, B.H.M.; Chalhoub, E. The understanding of Parkinson’s disease through genetics and new therapies. Brain Behav. 2022, 12, e2577.
Marsili, L.; Rizzo, G.; Colosimo, C. Diagnostic Criteria for Parkinson’s Disease: From James Parkinson to the Concept of Prodromal Disease. Front. Neurol. 2018, 9, 156.
Armstrong, M.J.; Okun, M.S. Diagnosis and Treatment of Parkinson Disease: A Review. Jama 2020, 323, 548–560.
Olanow, C.W.; Goetz, C.G.; Kordower, J.H.; Stoessl, A.J.; Sossi, V.; Brin, M.F.; Shannon, K.M.; Nauert, G.M.; Perl, D.P.; Godbold, J.; et al. A double-blind controlled trial of bilateral fetal nigral transplantation in Parkinson’s disease. Ann. Neurol. 2003, 54, 403–414.
Gravitz, L. The promise and potential of stem cells in Parkinson’s disease. Nature 2021, 597, 8–10.
Lindvall, O.; Rehncrona, S.; Brundin, P.; Gustavii, B.; Astedt, B.; Widner, H.; Lindholm, T.; Björklund, A.; Leenders, K.L.; Rothwell, J.C.; et al. Human fetal dopamine neurons grafted into the striatum in two patients with severe Parkinson’s disease. A detailed account of methodology and a 6-month follow-up. Arch. Neurol. 1989, 46, 615–631.
Piccini, P.; Brooks, D.J.; Björklund, A.; Gunn, R.N.; Grasby, P.M.; Rimoldi, O.; Brundin, P.; Hagell, P.; Rehncrona, S.; Widner, H.; et al. Dopamine release from nigral transplants visualized in vivo in a Parkinson’s patient. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2, 1137–1140.
Kefalopoulou, Z.; Politis, M.; Piccini, P.; Mencacci, N.; Bhatia, K.; Jahanshahi, M.; Widner, H.; Rehncrona, S.; Brundin, P.; Björklund, A.; et al. Long-term clinical outcome of fetal cell transplantation for Parkinson disease: Two case reports. JAMA Neurol. 2014, 71, 83–87.
Freed, C.R.; Greene, P.E.; Breeze, R.E.; Tsai, W.Y.; DuMouchel, W.; Kao, R.; Dillon, S.; Winfield, H.; Culver, S.; Trojanowski, J.Q.; et al. Transplantation of embryonic dopamine neurons for severe Parkinson’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 344, 710–719.
Ma, Y.; Tang, C.; Chaly, T.; Greene, P.; Breeze, R.; Fahn, S.; Freed, C.; Dhawan, V.; Eidelberg, D. Dopamine cell implantation in Parkinson’s disease: Long-term clinical and (18)F-FDOPA PET outcomes. J. Nucl. Med. 2010, 51, 7–15.
Barker, R.A. Designing stem-cell-based dopamine cell replacement trials for Parkinson’s disease. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1045–1053.
Schweitzer, J.S.; Song, B.; Herrington, T.M.; Park, T.Y.; Lee, N.; Ko, S.; Jeon, J.; Cha, Y.; Kim, K.; Li, Q.; et al. Personalized iPSC-Derived Dopamine Progenitor Cells for Parkinson’s Disease. N Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1926–1932.
Marsili, L.; Bologna, M.; Kojovic, M.; Berardelli, A.; Espay, A.J.; Colosimo, C. Dystonia in atypical parkinsonian disorders. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2019, 66, 25–33.
Lee, P.H.; Lee, J.E.; Kim, H.S.; Song, S.K.; Lee, H.S.; Nam, H.S.; Cheong, J.W.; Jeong, Y.; Park, H.J.; Kim, D.J.; et al. A randomized trial of mesenchymal stem cells in multiple system atrophy. Ann. Neurol. 2012, 72, 32–40.
Giordano, R.; Canesi, M.; Isalberti, M.; Isaias, I.U.; Montemurro, T.; Viganò, M.; Montelatici, E.; Boldrin, V.; Benti, R.; Cortelezzi, A.; et al. Autologous mesenchymal stem cell therapy for progressive supranuclear palsy: Translation into a phase I controlled, randomized clinical study. J. Transl. Med. 2014, 12, 14.
Canesi, M.; Giordano, R.; Lazzari, L.; Isalberti, M.; Isaias, I.U.; Benti, R.; Rampini, P.; Marotta, G.; Colombo, A.; Cereda, E.; et al. Finding a new therapeutic approach for no-option Parkinsonisms: Mesenchymal stromal cells for progressive supranuclear palsy. J. Transl. Med. 2016, 14, 127.
Pezzoli, G.; Tesei, S.; Canesi, M.; Sacilotto, G.; Vittorio, M.; Mizuno, Y.; Mochizuki, H.; Antonini, A. The effect of repeated administrations of granulocyte colony stimulating factor for blood stem cells mobilization in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration and multiple system atrophy. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2010, 112, 65–67.
Chung, S.J.; Lee, T.Y.; Lee, Y.H.; Baik, K.; Jung, J.H.; Yoo, H.S.; Shim, C.J.; Eom, H.; Hong, J.Y.; Kim, D.J.; et al. Phase I Trial of Intra-arterial Administration of Autologous Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients with Multiple System Atrophy. Stem Cells Int. 2021, 2021, 9886877.
Ndayisaba, A.; Herrera-Vaquero, M.; Wenning, G.K.; Stefanova, N. Induced pluripotent stem cells in multiple system atrophy: Recent developments and scientific challenges. Clin. Auton Res. 2019, 29, 385–395.
Choi, S.W.; Park, K.B.; Woo, S.K.; Kang, S.K.; Ra, J.C. Treatment of progressive supranuclear palsy with autologous adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells: A case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2014, 8, 87.
Li, H.; Yuan, F.; Du, Y.; Pan, T.; Wen, W.; Li, S.; Wang, L.; Lu, A. Umbilical cord blood stem cells transplantation in a patient with severe progressive supranuclear palsy: A case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2021, 15, 574.

© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Upload a video for this entry

Information

Subjects: Neurosciences

Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :

Luca Marsili

Jennifer Sharma

Tiago Fleming Outeiro

Carlo Colosimo

View Times: 389

Update Date: 08 Mar 2023

Table of Contents

Video Upload Options

Confirm

1. Introduction

2. Parkinson’s Disease

3. Atypical Parkinsonian Disorders

References