Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Jingquan Liu
 -- 1128 2023-02-28 03:20:54 |
2 format correct
Conner Chen
 -2 word(s) 1126 2023-02-28 06:11:26 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Min, Y.; Yuan, C.; Fu, D.; Liu, J. The Sensing Techniques for Formaldehyde Detection. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/41723 (accessed on 26 December 2024).
Min Y, Yuan C, Fu D, Liu J. The Sensing Techniques for Formaldehyde Detection. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/41723. Accessed December 26, 2024.
Min, Yuru, Chenyao Yuan, Donglei Fu, Jingquan Liu. "The Sensing Techniques for Formaldehyde Detection" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/41723 (accessed December 26, 2024).
Min, Y., Yuan, C., Fu, D., & Liu, J. (2023, February 28). The Sensing Techniques for Formaldehyde Detection. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/41723
Min, Yuru, et al. "The Sensing Techniques for Formaldehyde Detection." Encyclopedia. Web. 28 February, 2023.
The Sensing Techniques for Formaldehyde Detection
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/chemosensors11020134

Formaldehyde has been regarded as a common indoor pollutant and does great harm to human health, which has caused the relevant departments to pay attention to its accurate detection. Spectrophotometry, gas chromatography, liquid chromatography, and other methods have been proposed for formaldehyde detection. Among them, the gas sensor is especially suitable for common gaseous formaldehyde detection with the fastest response speed and the highest sensitivity. 

formaldehyde detection gas sensor polymer

1. Introduction

In society nowadays, the majority of human production and living activities are carried out indoors; that is, modern people usually spend 80–90% of their time indoors [1]. People’s physical and mental health is directly affected by indoor air quality [1][2][3]. At present, more than 400 types of indoor pollutants have been identified, which is far more than human expectations [4][5][6]. Volatile organic compounds (VOC) are common indoor air pollutants and have a great impact on human health [7][8][9]. When the indoor concentration of VOC reaches a certain level, it will cause nausea, dizziness, vomiting, etc., in a short time, and even coma in a severe case [10][11][12].
Formaldehyde has penetrated all aspects of human production and life as a common VOC, which plays a significant role in the chemical industry, textile industry, anti-corrosion, and even cosmetics [13][14][15][16][17]. For ordinary families, indoor formaldehyde pollution mainly comes from indoor decoration [18]. For example, the main component of most adhesives used in artificial panels and furniture is formaldehyde [19]. In addition, the paint and coatings used in interior decoration also contain a lot of formaldehyde [20]. The residual formaldehyde after decoration will gradually be released into the surrounding environment [21][22][23]. Generally, the formaldehyde content of newly decorated houses will exceed the standard by more than six times, and the formaldehyde release period will last for 3–15 years [24][25][26]. In 1995, the International Agency for Research on Cancer has already identified formaldehyde as a suspected carcinogen [27][28]; in 2004, formaldehyde was upgraded from a Class II carcinogen to a Class I carcinogen [12][29]; in 2010, formaldehyde was defined as one of nine indoor air pollutants in indoor air quality guidelines issued by the World Health Organization [10][16]. Besides, as a protoplasmic toxic substance, formaldehyde can be combined with proteins as well [30][31][32]. Inhalation of high concentrations of formaldehyde may lead to respiratory edema and induce bronchial asthma [33][34][35][36]. Direct skin contact with formaldehyde can cause dermatitis, necrosis, and even skin cancer [37][38][39]. And long-term exposure to formaldehyde will cause the decline of body function and poison the nervous system, cardiovascular system, and reproductive system to some extent [38][40][41][42]. Therefore, the real-time detection of gaseous formaldehyde in an indoor environment is very important for human beings.
Sensing technology is one of the commonly used methods to monitor indoor formaldehyde [10]. Compared with the colorimetric method, chromatographic analysis, spectrophotometry, and other methods for formaldehyde monitoring, the detection of formaldehyde by gas sensors has higher sensitivity and shorter reaction time [43][44]. Briefly, these sensors based on metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) material and polymer material are the most researched gaseous formaldehyde sensors [45][46][47]. Accurate identification of formaldehyde in complex atmospheric environments is a great challenge for MOS-based sensors [48][49][50]. Compared with the MOS sensor, the development of polymer sensors started late, but the development speed is also very fast [51][52]. The advantage of polymer sensors is that they can accurately identify formaldehyde based on specific chemical reactions.

2. The Sensing Techniques for Formaldehyde Detection

Currently, resistance sensors and quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) sensors are the most common sensing types in the field of polymer and polymer nanocomposite sensors [53][54]. In addition, microelectromechanical system (MEMS) resonators, fluorescence probes, and other sensing techniques are also reported in some studies [55][56]. All of the above methods can be used to detect trace formaldehyde with high sensitivity [2]. The resistance sensor has the longest history, but its operation method is more complex [3]. The QCM sensor has the advantages of simple operation, high sensitivity, and low energy consumption [57]. At present, the QCM sensor is the most widely studied in the field of gaseous formaldehyde detection [58]. Compared with QCM sensors, MEMS sensors such as film bulk acoustic resonators have higher sensitivity due to the higher resonant frequency [59]. But now, the development of MEMS sensors is not mature enough, and the cost is high. Fluorescent sensors are used to visualize formaldehyde levels in living cells because of their good biocompatibility [60].
The resistance sensor is one of the most commonly used formaldehyde sensors with the longest history [61]. Further, the working principle of the resistance sensor is to detect the gas by recording the change in the resistance value when the sensitive material contacts the gas [62]. Good selectivity, high sensitivity, and low detection limit are the advantages of the resistance sensors [63].
In recent years, QCM has gradually replaced resistance testing and has become the most popular research direction in the field of organic polymer sensors for detecting gaseous formaldehyde [64][65]. QCM is a sensitive quality detection platform whose sensitivity is nanogram (ng) level [66]. In theory, the QCM can detect mass changes equivalent to a fraction of a monolayer or atomic layer, and the most basic principle of QCM is the piezoelectric effect of quartz crystals [67][68]. In 1959, Sauerbrey came to the conclusion that the resonant frequency change of QCM is proportional to the added mass on the quartz crystal [66][69]. On this basis, the Sauerbrey equation is summarized to represent the relationship between the mass adsorbed on the crystal sensor and the resonant frequency [29]. Based on the Sauerbrey equation, the QCM surface can be modified with different sensing materials to achieve highly sensitive detection of target gas [57]. The surface of QCM was modified with formaldehyde-sensitive materials [53]. Based on the Sauerbrey equation, the mass change on QCM is calculated according to the change frequency of QCM to realize the detection of formaldehyde gas [70]. As early as 2003, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)-modified QCM has been used to determine ammonia [71]. Currently, the QCM sensor has been widely used in humidity, benzene vapor, formaldehyde vapor, and other detection fields [66][67]. Similar to QCM, MEMS are often used as mass-loading platforms when used as gas sensors. The sensitive layer is coated on the surface of the resonator to absorb the target gas molecules, and then the small mass change is monitored by the change of the resonant frequency [72]. Compared with traditional electro-acoustic resonators (such as QCM), MEMS resonators use 1–2 microns-thick piezoelectric films instead of crystal plates [73][74]. Therefore, MEMS resonators, such as thin-film volume acoustic resonators, have higher sensitivity, which has attracted wide attention in the field of gas detection [59][75].
Fluorescence is a cold luminescence phenomenon of photoluminescence [76]. In the ground state, there is no electron transition, that is, no fluorescence [35][77]. When the recognition site on the fluorescent molecule interacts with the analyte, the identified chemical signal is transmitted to the fluorophore through different signal transduction mechanisms [55]. The properties of fluorophore, such as the emission wavelength, intensity, or fluorescence lifetime of fluorescence, can be changed to realize the quantitative or qualitative detection of the measured object [78].

References

  1. Chen, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Chen, C. Design and evaluation of Cu-modified ZnO microspheres as a high performance formaldehyde sensor based on density functional theory. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 532, 147446.
  2. Castro-Hurtado, I.; Mandayo, G.G.; Castaño, E. Conductometric formaldehyde gas sensors. A review: From conventional films to nanostructured materials. Thin Solid Film. 2013, 548, 665–676.
  3. Chung, P.R.; Tzeng, C.T.; Ke, M.T.; Lee, C.Y. Formaldehyde gas sensors: A review. Sensors 2013, 13, 4468–4484.
  4. Li, B.; Zhou, Q.; Peng, S.; Liao, Y. Recent Advances of SnO2-Based Sensors for Detecting Volatile Organic Compounds. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 321.
  5. Liu, L.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, X.; Xu, G.; Lu, Y.; Liu, Q. Smartphone-based sensing system using ZnO and graphene modified electrodes for VOCs detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 93, 94–101.
  6. Zhang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Du, T.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Q. A gas sensor array for the simultaneous detection of multiple VOCs. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1960.
  7. Rezaee, A.; Rangkooy, H.; Jonidi-Jafari, A.; Khavanin, A. Surface modification of bone char for removal of formaldehyde from air. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 286, 235–239.
  8. de Falco, G.; Barczak, M.; Montagnaro, F.; Bandosz, T.J. A New Generation of Surface Active Carbon Textiles as Reactive Adsorbents of Indoor Formaldehyde. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 8066–8076.
  9. de Falco, G.; Li, W.; Cimino, S.; Bandosz, T.J. Role of sulfur and nitrogen surface groups in adsorption of formaldehyde on nanoporous carbons. Carbon 2018, 138, 283–291.
  10. Wu, K.; Kong, X.Y.; Xiao, K.; Wei, Y.; Zhu, C.; Zhou, R.; Si, M.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wen, L. Engineered Smart Gating Nanochannels for High Performance in Formaldehyde Detection and Removal. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1807953.
  11. Shen, X.; Du, X.; Yang, D.; Ran, J.; Yang, Z.; Chen, Y. Influence of physical structures and chemical modification on VOCs adsorption characteristics of molecular sieves. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106729.
  12. Hosono, K.; Matsubara, I.; Murayama, N.; Shin, W.; Izu, N. The sensitivity of 4-ethylbenzenesulfonic acid-doped plasma polymerized polypyrrole films to volatile organic compounds. Thin Solid Film. 2005, 484, 396–399.
  13. Chen, Z.-L.; Wang, D.; Wang, X.-Y.; Yang, J.-H. Enhanced formaldehyde sensitivity of two-dimensional mesoporous SnO2 by nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots. Rare Met. 2021, 40, 1561–1570.
  14. Liu, X.; Ma, R.; Wang, X.; Ma, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhuang, L.; Zhang, S.; Jehan, R.; Chen, J.; Wang, X. Graphene oxide-based materials for efficient removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solution: A review. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 252, 62–73.
  15. Shao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, R.; Chen, J.; Zhang, F.; Linhardt, R.J.; Zhong, W. Biotechnology progress for removal of indoor gaseous formaldehyde. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 3715–3727.
  16. Kamal, M.S.; Razzak, S.A.; Hossain, M.M. Catalytic oxidation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)—A review. Atmos. Environ. 2016, 140, 117–134.
  17. Wang, S.; Sun, H.; Ang, H.M.; Tadé, M.O. Adsorptive remediation of environmental pollutants using novel graphene-based nanomaterials. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 226, 336–347.
  18. Bo, Z.; Yuan, M.; Mao, S.; Chen, X.; Yan, J.; Cen, K. Decoration of vertical graphene with tin dioxide nanoparticles for highly sensitive room temperature formaldehyde sensing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 256, 1011–1020.
  19. Suzuki, Y.; Nakano, N.; Suzuki, K. Portable sick house syndrome gas monitoring system based on novel colorimetric reagents for the highly selective and sensitive detection of formaldehyde. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 5695–5700.
  20. Alizadeh, T.; Soltani, L.H. Graphene/poly(methyl methacrylate) chemiresistor sensor for formaldehyde odor sensing. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 248–249, 401–406.
  21. Feng, Y.; Ling, L.; Nie, J.; Han, K.; Chen, X.; Bian, Z.; Li, H.; Wang, Z.L. Self-Powered Electrostatic Filter with Enhanced Photocatalytic Degradation of Formaldehyde Based on Built-in Triboelectric Nanogenerators. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 12411–12418.
  22. Robert, B.; Nallathambi, G. Indoor formaldehyde removal by catalytic oxidation, adsorption and nanofibrous membranes: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 2551–2579.
  23. Yuan, C.; Pu, J.; Fu, D.; Min, Y.; Wang, L.; Liu, J. UV-vis spectroscopic detection of formaldehyde and its analogs: A convenient and sensitive methodology. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 438, 129457.
  24. Chen, D.; Yuan, Y.J. Thin-Film Sensors for Detection of Formaldehyde: A Review. IEEE Sens. J. 2015, 15, 6749–6760.
  25. Zhang, L.; Shi, J.; Jiang, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Qiao, S.; Li, J.; Wang, R.; Meng, R.; Zhu, Y.; Zheng, Y. Bioinspired preparation of polydopamine microcapsule for multienzyme system construction. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 300–306.
  26. Pei, J.; Zhang, J.S. On the performance and mechanisms of formaldehyde removal by chemi-sorbents. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 167, 59–66.
  27. Carquigny, S.; Redon, N.; Plaisance, H.; Reynaud, S. Development of a Polyaniline/Fluoral-P Chemical Sensor for Gaseous Formaldehyde Detection. IEEE Sens. J. 2012, 12, 1300–1306.
  28. Feng, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, X.; Hu, J. The fabrication and characterization of a formaldehyde odor sensor using molecularly imprinted polymers. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 284, 378–382.
  29. Jha, S.K.; Hayashi, K. A quick responding quartz crystal microbalance sensor array based on molecular imprinted polyacrylic acids coating for selective identification of aldehydes in body odor. Talanta 2015, 134, 105–119.
  30. Burini, G.; Coli, R. Determination of formaldehyde in spirits by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection after derivatization. Anal. Chim. Acta 2004, 511, 155–158.
  31. Gil-Gonzalez, N.; Benito-Lopez, F.; Castano, E.; Morant-Minana, M.C. Imidazole-based ionogel as room temperature benzene and formaldehyde sensor. Mikrochim. Acta 2020, 187, 638.
  32. Aksornneam, L.; Kanatharana, P.; Thavarungkul, P.; Thammakhet, C. 5-Aminofluorescein doped polyvinyl alcohol film for the detection of formaldehyde in vegetables and seafood. Anal. Methods 2016, 8, 1249–1256.
  33. Liu, J.; Zhao, W.; Liu, J.; Cai, X.; Liang, D.; Tang, S.; Xu, B. Preparation of a quartz microbalance sensor based on molecularly imprinted polymers and its application in formaldehyde detection. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 13235–13241.
  34. Tang, Y.; Kong, X.; Xu, A.; Dong, B.; Lin, W. Development of a Two-Photon Fluorescent Probe for Imaging of Endogenous Formaldehyde in Living Tissues. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2016, 55, 3356–3359.
  35. Yuan, G.; Ding, H.; Peng, L.; Zhou, L.; Lin, Q. A novel fluorescent probe for ratiometric detection of formaldehyde in real food samples, living tissues and zebrafish. Food Chem. 2020, 331, 127221.
  36. Liu, X.; Li, N.; Li, M.; Chen, H.; Zhang, N.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, K. Recent progress in fluorescent probes for detection of carbonyl species: Formaldehyde, carbon monoxide and phosgene. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 404, 213109.
  37. Song, M.G.; Choi, J.; Jeong, H.E.; Song, K.; Jeon, S.; Cha, J.; Baeck, S.-H.; Shim, S.E.; Qian, Y. A comprehensive study of various amine-functionalized graphene oxides for room temperature formaldehyde gas detection: Experimental and theoretical approaches. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 529, 147189.
  38. Zhang, Y.; Qi, J.; Li, M.; Gao, D.; Xing, C. Fluorescence Probe Based on Graphene Quantum Dots for Selective, Sensitive and Visualized Detection of Formaldehyde in Food. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5273.
  39. Wang, D.; Lian, F.; Yao, S.; Ge, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, J.; Song, X.; Zhao, C.; Xu, K. Detection of formaldehyde (HCHO) in solution based on the autocatalytic oxidation reaction of o-phenylenediamine (OPD) induced by silver ions (Ag+). J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2021, 18, 3387–3397.
  40. Wei, T.-B.; Dang, L.-R.; Hu, J.-P.; Jia, Y.; Lin, Q.; Yao, H.; Shi, B.; Zhang, Y.-M.; Qu, W.-J. A simple phenazine derivative fluorescence sensor for detecting formaldehyde. New J. Chem. 2022, 46, 20658–20663.
  41. Yang, F.; Gu, C.; Liu, B.; Hou, C.; Zhou, K. Pt-activated Ce4La6O17 nanocomposites for formaldehyde and carbon monoxide sensor at low operating temperature. J. Alloy. Compd. 2019, 787, 173–179.
  42. Ding, B.; Wang, M.; Yu, J.; Sun, G. Gas sensors based on electrospun nanofibers. Sensors 2009, 9, 1609.
  43. Akbar, A.S.; Mardhiah, A.; Saidi, N.; Lelifajri, D. The effect of graphite composition on polyaniline film performance for formalin gas sensor. Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop. 2021, 34, 597–604.
  44. Xu, D.; Ge, K.; Chen, Y.; Qi, S.; Qiu, J.; Liu, Q. Cable-Like Core-Shell Mesoporous SnO2 Nanofibers by Single-Nozzle Electrospinning Phase Separation for Formaldehyde Sensing. Chemistry 2020, 26, 9365–9370.
  45. Willander, M.; Nur, O.; Zaman, S.; Zainelabdin, A.; Bano, N.; Hussain, I. Zinc oxide nanorods/polymer hybrid heterojunctions for white light emitting diodes. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2011, 44, 224017.
  46. Li, Z.; Fan, Y.; Zhan, J. In2O3Nanofibers and Nanoribbons: Preparation by Electrospinning and Their Formaldehyde Gas-Sensing Properties. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 2010, 3348–3353.
  47. Zhou, S.; Chen, M.; Lu, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, B.; Wei, H.; Hu, J.; Wang, H.; Liu, Q. Ag Nanoparticles Sensitized In2O3 Nanograin for the Ultrasensitive HCHO Detection at Room Temperature. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 365.
  48. Zhang, M.; Tang, Y.; Tian, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Q. Magnetron co-sputtering optimized aluminum-doped zinc oxide (AZO) film for high-response formaldehyde sensing. J. Alloy. Compd. 2021, 880, 160510.
  49. Mostafapour, S.; Mohamadi Gharaghani, F.; Hemmateenejad, B. Converting electronic nose into opto-electronic nose by mixing MoS2 quantum dots with organic reagents: Application to recognition of aldehydes and ketones and determination of formaldehyde in milk. Anal. Chim. Acta 2021, 1170, 338654.
  50. Huang, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, Z.; Li, J.; Cao, X.; Tang, J.; Li, X.; Geng, Y.; Wang, J.; Du, Y.; et al. Bimetal Ag NP and Au NC modified In2O3 for ultra-sensitive detection of ppb-level HCHO. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 373, 132664.
  51. Lou, C.; Huang, Q.; Li, Z.; Lei, G.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J. Fe2O3-sensitized SnO2 nanosheets via atomic layer deposition for sensitive formaldehyde detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 345, 130429.
  52. Li, X.Y.; Sun, G.T.; Fan, F.; Li, Y.Y.; Liu, Q.C.; Yao, H.C.; Li, Z.J. Au(25) Nanoclusters Incorporating Three-Dimensionally Ordered Macroporous In2O3 for Highly Sensitive and Selective Formaldehyde Sensing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 564–573.
  53. Temel, F. One novel calix arene based QCM sensor for sensitive, selective and high performance-sensing of formaldehyde at room temperature. Talanta 2020, 211, 120725.
  54. Hu, J.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Y. Batch fabrication of formaldehyde sensors based on LaFeO3 thin film with ppb-level detection limit. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 349, 130738.
  55. Tai, H.; Li, X.; Jiang, Y.; Xie, G.; Du, X. The enhanced formaldehyde-sensing properties of P3HT-ZnO hybrid thin film OTFT sensor and further insight into its stability. Sensors 2015, 15, 2086–2103.
  56. Chen, D.; Yang, L.; Yu, W.; Wu, M.; Wang, W.; Wang, H. Micro-Electromechanical Acoustic Resonator Coated with Polyethyleneimine Nanofibers for the Detection of Formaldehyde Vapor. Micromachines 2018, 9, 62.
  57. Wang, L.; Gao, J.; Xu, J. QCM formaldehyde sensing materials: Design and sensing mechanism. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 293, 71–82.
  58. Wang, L.; Yu, Y.; Xiang, Q.; Xu, J.; Cheng, Z.; Xu, J. PODS-covered PDA film based formaldehyde sensor for avoiding humidity false response. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 255, 2704–2712.
  59. Ma, J.; Wang, S.; Chen, D.; Wang, W.; Zhang, Z.; Song, S.; Yu, W. ZnO piezoelectric film resonator modified with multi-walled carbon nanotubes/polyethyleneimine bilayer for the detection of trace formaldehyde. Appl. Phys. A 2017, 124, 56.
  60. Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Yue, J.; Xu, M.; An, B.; Ma, C.; Li, W.; Liu, S. Hydrothermal synthesis of nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dots from lignin for formaldehyde determination. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 29178–29185.
  61. Nag, S.; Pradhan, S.; Naskar, H.; Roy, R.B.; Tudu, B.; Pramanik, P.; Bandyopadhyay, R. A Simple Nano Cerium Oxide Modified Graphite Electrode for Electrochemical Detection of Formaldehyde in Mushroom. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 21, 12019–12026.
  62. Stewart, K.M.E.; Penlidis, A. Evaluation of polymeric nanocomposites for the detection of toxic gas analytes. J. Macromol. Sci. Part A 2016, 53, 610–618.
  63. Tang, X.; Raskin, J.P.; Lahem, D.; Krumpmann, A.; Decroly, A.; Debliquy, M. A Formaldehyde Sensor Based on Molecularly-Imprinted Polymer on a TiO2 Nanotube Array. Sensors 2017, 17, 675.
  64. Hu, W.; Chen, S.; Liu, L.; Ding, B.; Wang, H. Formaldehyde sensors based on nanofibrous polyethyleneimine/bacterial cellulose membranes coated quartz crystal microbalance. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 157, 554–559.
  65. Tai, H.; Bao, X.; He, Y.; Du, X.; Xie, G.; Jiang, Y. Enhanced Formaldehyde-Sensing Performances of Mixed Polyethyleneimine-Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Composite Films on Quartz Crystal Microbalance. IEEE Sens. J. 2015, 15, 6904–6911.
  66. Wang, X.; Ding, B.; Sun, M.; Yu, J.; Sun, G. Nanofibrous polyethyleneimine membranes as sensitive coatings for quartz crystal microbalance-based formaldehyde sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2010, 144, 11–17.
  67. Ding, B.; Wang, X.; Yu, J.; Wang, M. Polyamide 6 composite nano-fiber/net functionalized by polyethyleneimine on quartz crystal microbalance for highly sensitive formaldehyde sensors. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 12784–12792.
  68. Zhang, C.; Wang, X.; Lin, J.; Ding, B.; Yu, J.; Pan, N. Nanoporous polystyrene fibers functionalized by polyethyleneimine for enhanced formaldehyde sensing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 152, 316–323.
  69. Antwi-Boampong, S.; BelBruno, J.J. Detection of formaldehyde vapor using conductive polymer films. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 182, 300–306.
  70. Wang, X.; Cui, F.; Lin, J.; Ding, B.; Yu, J.; Al-Deyab, S.S. Functionalized nanoporous TiO2 fibers on quartz crystal microbalance platform for formaldehyde sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2012, 171–172, 658–665.
  71. Mirmohseni, A. Construction of a sensor for determination of ammonia and aliphatic amines using polyvinylpyrrolidone coated quartz crystal microbalance. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2003, 89, 164–172.
  72. Arabi, M.; Alghamdi, M.; Kabel, K.; Labena, A.; Gado, W.S.; Mavani, B.; Scott, A.J.; Penlidis, A.; Yavuz, M.; Abdel-Rahman, E. Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds by Using MEMS Sensors. Sensors 2022, 22, 4102.
  73. Wang, J.; Zhan, D.; Wang, K.; Hang, W. The detection of formaldehyde using microelectromechanical acoustic resonator with multiwalled carbon nanotubes-polyethyleneimine composite coating. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2018, 28, 015003.
  74. Wang, W.; Chen, D.; Wang, H.; Yu, W.; Wu, M.; Yang, L. Film bulk acoustic formaldehyde sensor with layer-by-layer assembled carbon nanotubes/polyethyleneimine multilayers. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2018, 51, 055104.
  75. Song, S.; Chen, D.; Wang, H.; Guo, Q.; Wang, W.; Wu, M.; Yu, W. Film bulk acoustic formaldehyde sensor with polyethyleneimine-modified single-wall carbon nanotubes as sensitive layer. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 266, 204–212.
  76. Pan, S.; Roy, S.; Choudhury, N.; Behera, P.P.; Sivaprakasam, K.; Ramakrishnan, L.; De, P. From small molecules to polymeric probes: Recent advancements of formaldehyde sensors. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2022, 23, 49–63.
  77. Liu, Y.; Yang, H.; Ma, C.; Luo, S.; Xu, M.; Wu, Z.; Li, W.; Liu, S. Luminescent Transparent Wood Based on Lignin-Derived Carbon Dots as a Building Material for Dual-Channel, Real-Time, and Visual Detection of Formaldehyde Gas. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 36628–36638.
  78. Li, X.; Jiang, Y.; Tai, H.; Xie, G.; Dan, W. The fabrication and optimization of OTFT formaldehyde sensors based on Poly(3-hexythiophene)/ZnO composite films. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2013, 56, 1877–1882.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Chemistry, Analytical
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Yuru Min
,
Chenyao Yuan
,
Donglei Fu
,
Jingquan Liu
View Times: 542
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 28 Feb 2023
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Video Production Service
    Feedback