Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 3243 2023-02-27 02:27:35 |
2 layout Meta information modification 3243 2023-02-27 06:34:59 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Llaneras, J.; Belza, C.C.; Eisenstein, S.; Dobke, M.K. Tissue Senescence Reversing Techniques Modalities. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/41681 (accessed on 26 April 2024).
Llaneras J, Belza CC, Eisenstein S, Dobke MK. Tissue Senescence Reversing Techniques Modalities. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/41681. Accessed April 26, 2024.
Llaneras, Jason, Caitlyn C. Belza, Samuel Eisenstein, Marek K. Dobke. "Tissue Senescence Reversing Techniques Modalities" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/41681 (accessed April 26, 2024).
Llaneras, J., Belza, C.C., Eisenstein, S., & Dobke, M.K. (2023, February 27). Tissue Senescence Reversing Techniques Modalities. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/41681
Llaneras, Jason, et al. "Tissue Senescence Reversing Techniques Modalities." Encyclopedia. Web. 27 February, 2023.
Tissue Senescence Reversing Techniques Modalities
Edit

Senescent cells and fibrosis are important components that impact the regenerative capacity of skin, particularly when considering chronic non-healing wounds. Anoderm and perianal fistulas in the setting of Crohn’s disease are clinically pathophysiological extremes with consequently different healing processes which impact treatment modalities.

tissue senescence fibrosis wound healing regeneration

1. Introduction

One could argue that the cover title of Biomedicines’ Special Issue, “Fibrosis versus Regeneration of Skin”, is unfitting. Wound healing involves both fibrotic and regenerative components, and clinically exhibits different proportions of both mechanisms. Fibrosis is at one end of the spectrum (Figure 1), while the regenerative capacity of the skin, which depends on multiple elements, is at another end of the spectrum (Figure 2A,B). Surgical or traumatic acute wounds are expected to progress through the phases of normal healing, which typically result in a soft tissue defect. Normal wound healing consists of three overlapping stages: inflammation (4–6 days), cellular proliferation (4–24 days), and remodeling (21 days–2 years). Each phase is characterized by a variation in the type of cellular involvement and differences in the profile of cytokines recruited. Chronic wounds are defined as defects to the tissue that fail to progress in healing over the expected normal time frame, which is approximately four weeks. Typically, the fibrotic and regenerative arms of healing arrest in the inflammatory phase [1]. As the preliminary phase of wound healing, this phase features coagulation via platelet aggregation and the clotting cascade followed by recruitment of inflammatory cells. The inflammatory cells are recruited by various products of platelet degranulation (i.e., tissue growth factor beta), bacterial degradation (i.e., lipopolysaccharides) and the complement cascade which produces C5a. They key inflammatory cellular players include neutrophils, macrophages, monocytes, lymphocytes, and mast cells.
Figure 1. A twenty-two-year-old female with ear wounds secondary to a piercing. The patient’s ear healed with significant fibrosis and formation keloids.
Figure 2. (A) Thirty-two-year-old female with atopic dermatitis with a two-month history of progressive, non-healing superficial wrist wound; (B) the same patient three months later with an extremely apparent slow rate of re-epithelialization.
Given the intricate relationship between basic science and clinical models, these are both important factors contributing to the discussion of this volume’s main topic of skin fibrosis versus regeneration. Certainly, lessons learned from extreme cases of fibrosis and regeneration may have a significant impact on the research and treatment of standard acute and chronic skin lesions. One example of these extremes is scarless fetal wound healing. A transitionary phase between skin healing without fibrosis and healing with scar formation exists, and in humans it occurs gradually after 24 weeks of gestation [2]. This favorable pattern of healing persists for a while, which is evidenced by the unheard-of hypertrophic scarring in patients with early cleft lip repair. It is hypothesized that the absence or minimal acute inflammatory response in fetal wounds determines the trajectory of subsequent wound healing. It is postulated that this is related to differences between fetal and adult thrombocyte function, particularly within the cellular signaling pathway [3]. In addition, there are secretory differences between fetal and adult fibroblasts leading to alterations of the extracellular matrix. One might also consider the idea that fetal skin is composed of a higher ratio of type III collagen to type I collagen when compared to the adult skin. Finally, fetal skin has fewer cytokines promoting inflammation, which minimizes the development of the fibrotic response in utero [4].
In postnatal life, keratinocytes are present at superficial defects of the skin and retain the capacity to fully regenerate. However, in certain conditions (e.g., epidermolysis bullosa) there is a loss of the integrity of the skin epidermis, its ability to regenerate or differentiate, and its normal mechanism of compensation for daily wear and epidermal defect healing (Figure 2A,B). There are multiple signaling pathways regulating the ability of keratinocyte stem cells to proliferate and re-epithelialize superficial defects [5].
It has been shown that deeper dermal and subcutaneous layers are more likely to heal with fibrosis and scar formation (Figure 3). Insufficient vascularity and a senescent microenvironment are two important denominators in failed healing [6].
Figure 3. Thirty-six-year-old male with four-year history of non-healing trans-sphincteric anal fistula involving epidermis (arrow), deeper wound involving dermis (closer to the midline). Healing of such wound requires both effective fibrosis and regenerative mechanisms.
Regenerative repair involves the replacement of tissues with components comparable to the original tissues. In regeneration the aim is to restore or reestablish a normal, harmonious whole—an elegant interweaving of tissue elements. However, this is not always the case. Researchers develop a scar when the fibrotic components prevail, and the regeneration of fibroblast exceeds the reformation of other native tissue components (e.g., blood vessels) [7] (Figure 4). Researchers would therefore argue that the cover title should be “From Regeneration to Fibrosis of Skin”.
Figure 4. Regenerative healing is characterized by the restoration of structure, function, and physiology of damaged or absent tissue. Even under the most favorable conditions, post-fetal healing is rarely 100% regenerative.
Biologically, fibrosis is part of skin regeneration. Given the dermatologist or plastic surgeon perspective, fibrosis is usually linked with an untoward outcome of healing [8]. Conversely, scarring of the dermis following superficial wounds can result in skin tightening and may be considered a cosmetic benefit [9]. In skin wound healing, the matricellular protein CCN1 can induce fibroblast senescence and thereby reduce fibrosis via activation of the DNA damage response and reactive oxygen species signaling [10]. However, the formation of scar tissue is classically perceived as detrimental for the overall outcome from both a cosmetic and functional standpoint. In some situations, the morbidity associated with a wound is so profound that healing of the defect by either fibrosis, epithelial regeneration, or both is the best clinical course of action and often appreciated by the patient [11].
Senescent cells and fibrosis are important components of the healing and aging processes. One of the hallmarks of chronic non-healing wounds is cellular senescence. Senescent cells are alive and metabolically active but non-proliferative. The pathogenesis of chronic skin wounds is complex and may involve many different molecular and cellular pathways. Exceedingly proliferative fibroblasts may create an imbalance between the healing trajectory of different organ (e.g., skin) components by forming scar on the expense of regenerative processes.
Why was the model of two clinically relative pathophysiological extremes, anoderm and Crohn’s disease, selected for review to address the issue of skin fibrosis versus regeneration? These were chosen to increase evidentiary weight, given that wound healing research models are typically limited and focused either on fibrosis or regeneration. Measuring the immediate clinical utility of diverse basic science research observations is difficult. Across most realms of scientific discovery, researchers are posed with the challenge of translating benchwork to bedside use. Additionally, clinical practice and management strategies typically require a combination of problems that must be addressed. One such example, which demonstrates a multiplicity of healing problems, is anodermal lesions during the course of Crohn’s disease.
That being said, there have been major recent advancements in innovative research, which have changed the game for clinical management of wound healing. Some note worth examples include transforming growth factor beta (a central factor of fibrosis), controlling collagen production, and understanding myofibroblast differentiation leading to matrix accumulation and contraction. Research has also advanced the conceptualization of metastatic spread of cancer cells with pleiotropic signaling which contributes to oncological drug resistance. Perhaps all wounds ranging from fetal skin wounds, to acute skin wounds in adults, to chronic lesions, exhibit a different degree of inflammation, proliferation, regeneration and fibrosis. However, the chronic wound model allows for identification of factors leading to healing pathology. This consequently lends to the development of novel and potentially more precise treatments through a targeted approach to drug discovery.
Perianal Crohn’s Disease (PCD) is a major cause of morbidity in patients with Crohn’s, affecting up to 30% of patients with luminal disease. This disease, which may includes skin tags, fissures, abscesses, fistulae, and stenosis often leads to significant pain, discharge, bleeding, itching, and ultimately incontinence. Patients with PCD have greater challenges in obtaining clinical remission than those with purely luminal disease. In particular, perianal fistulizing disease has proven to be one of the greatest treatment challenges in maximizing patients’ quality of life. Such wounds require simultaneously effective fibrosis and regenerative mechanisms to heal. These fistulas offer a model of impairment involving both fibrotic and regenerative components. In addition, clinicians are aware that this healing impairment in Crohn’s disease patients is at the extreme level [12]. Healing impairment in Crohn’s disease is not only extreme but also truly multifactorial. Therefore, the review of healing of anodermal lesions under this disease pathophysiology appeared to be a valid and interesting pathology model for the review. The knowledge to be gained from this example is important for surgeons, but also pertains to researchers across many domains of study.
In healthy individuals, the anoderm is known to heal rapidly despite a seemingly unfavorable healing environment which is composed of constantly moving tissue layers and heavy loads of microbial organisms. On the other hand, perianal fistulas in the setting of Crohn’s disease are particularly prone to non-healing due to the nature of the disease itself [13][14]. Histological findings in non-healing anal fistulas include major defects in the stratified squamous epithelium. The absence of signs of epithelialization would suggest that the predominant healing impairment involves regenerative components [15].
To date biologic therapy has been the medical mainstay of treatment in this patient population. When considering the options, the most effective treatment involves antibodies directed against TNF-a, however, management can also include anti-integrin therapy, as well as medicines targeting various interleukins and the JAK signal transduction cascade [13]. “Excisional/tissue rearrangement” surgery supposed to convert wound from chronic to acute. However, even in the best of circumstances, employing these medications with effective curettage and drainage, clinical healing rates are generally below 50% with early recurrence rates also approaching 50% in the group which achieved clinical remission [12][13]. Management of the local sepsis with the previously mentioned curettage and seton drain placement is considered necessary to optimize the local microenvironment for fistula resolution.
There are also numerous surgical options for patients with Crohn’s fistulae, primarily because none have proven to be particularly effective or superior to the others. That being said, there is certainly evidence that surgery, in the setting of medical management, increases the likelihood that patients will obtain clinical closure of their fistula tracts [12]. The primary tenets of most surgical options include closure of the internal orifice, ligation of the fistula tract, and preservation of continence via minimal transection of the anal sphincter musculature. Because of the inflammatory nature of the disease only a minority of patients will even be considered candidates for some of the more complex repairs given that the surgical wounds are at risk of ineffective healing should they be created in the setting of poorly controlled inflammatory disease. This, in turn, places the patient at a greater risk for a variety of complications and thus care needs to be taken when considering which patients may ultimately be a surgical candidate. The potential for local sepsis must also be controlled via effective drainage prior to considering repair. Usually, the combination of seton drainage and medical management means that patients must often wait great periods of time between the initial development of their fistula and the attempts at definitive surgical management. The expectation is that with time, control of sepsis, and inhibition of the inflammatory process, that the local fistula microenvironment will more closely represent the M2 phenotype which would potentially lead to higher fistula healing rates.
Clearly the essential processes of “fibrosis” to obliterate the fistula tract and “regeneration” to restore the defect by epithelialization are uniquely intertwined and tissue senescence appears to be the key factor yielding non-healing tissue. In addition, the anoderm skin resides in the area between the dentate line and the area around the anal verge which is composed of non-keratinized squamous epithelium. This region has a relatively low stem cell content, as opposed to skin elsewhere which contains hair follicles and glands [16]. The relative absence of structures such as keratinocytes, which source multipotent stem cells, strengthens the notion that anoderm healing should be a model for investigation of fibrosis vs. regeneration [17]. Therefore, studies evaluating the efficacy of different treatment modalities for lesions located in these extreme conditions (i.e., in the anus, and in Crohn’s disease) may be needed to gain a better understanding of skin regeneration, bioengineering of skin substitutes, treatment of skin diseases and cosmetology [18].
Most vascular changes in Crohn’s disease are either degenerative or inflammatory in nature resulting in reduced tissue perfusion [6][19] (Figure 5). Surgical intervention (e.g., fistulotomy) removes locally diseased tissue but does not reverse the underlying disease process. Local administration of anti-inflammatory agents (e.g., TNF-alpha antibodies) reduces signs of inflammation but rarely results in permanent fistula healing. The use of senolytic agents (e.g., nutritional supplement Quercetine) or autologous fat transfer with stem cell fraction “controlled” by senescent cells appears promising as they target multiple senescence-associated molecular pathways [13][20].
Figure 5. Crucial constituents for the reversal of tissue senescence and the shift of the healing processes towards regenerative the mode is initiated by peri-fistula administration of autologous fat with stromal cell fractions. Fat tissue provides a scaffold to support regenerative repair, angiogenesis, cytokines supporting cells proliferation, differentiation and helps to create environment capable of responding to anti-inflammatory drugs and biomechanical/surgical stimuli. (A) Non-healing fistula lesion (Crohn’s disease patient); (B) biopsies reveal poor microvascular network in fistula walls; (C) topical administration of processed (washed and filtered utilizing PureGraft System, Bimini, Solana Beach, CA, USA); (D) a few months later, biopsy typically reveals enriched blood vessels network.

2. Senescence Reversing Modalities

2.1. Autologous Fat Grafting

In recent years, topical transplantation of autologous fat tissue for the treatment of complex wounds, tissue rejuvenation and contouring has become increasingly popular [21]. Several studies have shown promising outcomes when lipoaspirate is used to treat chronic wounds such as diabetic ulcers, radiation lesions, and non-healing burns. Even though the clinical effects of fat transfers are encouraging, the underlying pathway of this senolytic effect is still a matter of investigation. Current theories suggest that this mechanism is multifactorial. More dramatic results are associated when the stromal vascular fraction (stem cell to adipocyte ratio) is increased. Some studies have shown that supplementing the injected fat and the use of different fat processing techniques have been able to increase this ratio [22]. Extrapolating on this, researchers team found surprising results when investigating how adipocyte derived stem cells are influenced by chemotherapy drugs in breast cancer patients. Researchers observed moderate changes regarding cell viability, cell count, cell populations and receptor profile by flow cytometry, and colony forming units with rebound after systemic chemotherapy.
This should warrant similar investigations in Crohn’s disease patients [23]. One of the plausible explanations of the diverse results of fat grafting may be related to changes in macrophage polarization and a shift toward an anti-inflammatory phenotype leading to reduction in fibrosis and improved fat graft retention [24]. Knowledge of the metabolic shift from a catabolic state to an anabolic state (from senescence to proliferative profile) could impact the sequencing and timing of pharmacological treatment. Some propose that change of the local hormonal milieu though the delivery of leptins may play a significant role, especially from an angiogenic standpoint [25]. There is also data supporting the hypothesis that the local cytokine milieu serves as critical factor in the efficacy of local stem cells treatment [16][21]. The multipotent capacity of fat cells may be an instrumental aspect of enhanced healing through multiple mechanisms. For instance, the capability of adipocytes to differentiate into dermal fibroblasts may accelerate formation of “granulation tissue” and stimulate the fibrotic component of healing. Additionally, keratinocyte-like cells have been found to maintain the capacity to form epidermis, which may exemplify a regenerative-type of healing [26].

2.2. Clinical Perspective

Clinical outcomes support expectations derived from experimental investigations and observations of chronic wounds other than anodermal wounds. While the thirty-four Crohn’s disease patients did experience decreased success rates when compared with non-Crohn’s disease patients, they still had 79% improvement and 49% closure, with 35% recurrence, superior to the recurrence rate of 44% for infliximab and non-cutting seton placement when autologous fat grafting was performed [27]. This is also comparable to reported closure rates of around 58% in endorectal advancement flap procedures and 48% for ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedures in Crohn’s disease [28].

2.3. Pharmacological and Immunomodulating Agents

Pharmacological agents downregulate host pro-inflammatory mediators (e.g., tumor necrosis factor alpha) and upregulate anti-inflammatory or immune-regulatory factors both of which improve the healing potential of anoderm fistulas. There has been reported differences in gene expressions between patients who have had a clinical improvement. Certain genes that favor a positive clinical response include TNFAIP6 and IL-11. Extrapolating this data to general skin biology suggests that the balance between regenerative and fibrotic potential is genomically determined and that the development of personalized protocols for skin therapeutics will certainly require a personalized approach [8][13][29]. Additionally, inflammatory bowel disease lesions may not heal (e.g., do not re-epithelialize) because of epithelial cell telomere dysfunction. Observations examining experimental senescence models with telomere dysfunction point to the therapeutic potential of pharmacological interventions with telomerase reactivation and suppression of DNA damage signaling which restores epidermal regenerative capacity [19][30][31]. Persistence and frequent recurrence of fistulas supports the notion that the disease is more related to inflammatory rather than infectious factors. Observed reductions in the macrophage M1/M2 ratios in anal fistula patients supports this notion. The M2 anti-inflammatory phenotype supports neovascularization and fat graft retention. Reducing this ratio would consequently support both fat and stem cells grafting to tissue affected by fistulization. The administration of agents that could change the cellular signaling pathway of macrophage polarization, would ultimately result in wound healing [24][32].
In general, lessons learned from research on tissue senescence have an application beyond fibrosis versus regeneration in “extreme” conditions such as anal fistulas, diabetic foot ulcers and epidermolysis bullosa. Pivotal aspects of the pathophysiology of these conditions allows for easier identification and understanding of therapeutic opportunities. The creation of inflammation and fibrosis, which reduce immune microenvironments, and support the regenerative capacity of skin components is shared by pathological and “non-pathological” conditions (i.e., skin aging) with concepts of comprehensive, multiprong, medical and cosmeceutical interventions, respectively [33].

New techniques are emerging that allow effective delivery of factors that reverse tissue senescence. SERPINS, a superfamily of proteins, generally consisting of multiple amino acid residues that regulate target enzymes through conformational changes can be delivered into senescent environment.34 For example, they may effectively inhibit uncontrolled polymorphonuclear leukocytes elastase destroying in certain conditions extracellular matrix components such as collagen and elastin leading not even to local senescence but worse, to tissue degradation [34]. In novel therapeutic approaches this activity can be even augmented by the delivery of SERPIN payload by extracellular vehicles [35]. There is increasing evidence suggesting that extracellular vehicles themselves may mediate signaling between cell types and have the potential to reverse negative courses of wound healing [36] (Figure 6).

Biomedicines 11 00537 g006

Figure 6. “Natural and engineered” extra cellular vesicle (EV) based signaling. EVs loaded with specific factors for reversing senescence and stimulating healing (e.g., serpins) may promote healing in all wound healing phases: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. They may also amplify the effectiveness of other therapies targeting senescent cells.

Finally, products with immediate commercial potential, such as selected allogeneic microvascular acellular tissue fragments (mVASC) have shown significant potential in senescence reversal both in experiment and in preliminary clinical studies. This particular product demonstrated enormous angiogenic potential thus modifying senescent, avascular microenvironment and it stimulates healing cascade in dose-response manner [37].

References

  1. Monaco, J.; Lawrence, T. Acute wound healing: An overview. Clin. Plast. Surg. 2003, 30, 1–12.
  2. Lorenz, H.; Longaker, M.; Perkocha, L.; Jennings, R.; Harrison, M.; Adzick, S. Scarless wound repair: A human fetal skin model. Development 1992, 114, 253–259.
  3. Margraf, A.; Nussbaum, C.; Sperandio, M. Ontogeny of platelets function. Blood Adv. 2019, 3, 692–703.
  4. Kendall, R.T.; Feghali-Bostwick, C. Fibroblasts in fibrosis: Novel role of mediators. Front. Pharmacol. 2014, 5, 123.
  5. Lloyd, S.M.; Leon, D.B.; Brady, M.O.; Rodriguez, D.; McReynolds Kweon, J.; Neely, A.E.; Blumensaadt, L.A.; Ho, P.J.; Bao, X. CDK9 activity switch associated with AFF1 and HEXIM1 controls differentiation initiation from epidermal progenitors. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 4408.
  6. Dobke, M.; Peterson, D.R.; Mattern, R.H.; Arm, D.M.; Li, W.W. Microvascular tissue as a platform technology to modify the local microenvironment and influence the healing cascade. Regen. Med. 2020, 15, 1313–1328.
  7. Harper, J.R.; McQuillan, D.J. A novel regenerative tissue matrix (RTM) technology for connective tissue reconstruction. Wounds 2007, 19, 163–168.
  8. Castagnoli, C.; Stella, M.; Magliacani, G. Role of T-lymphocytes and cytokines in post-burn hypertrophic scars. Wound Repair Regen. 2002, 10, 107–108.
  9. Le Pillouer, P.A.; Casanova, D. Scarring process after induced dermabrasion. Wound Repair Regen. 2022, 10, 113–115.
  10. Jun, J.I.; Lau, L.F. The matricellular protein CCN1 induces fibroblast senescence and restricts fibrosis in cutaneous wound healing. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12, 676–685.
  11. Nilforoushzadeh, M.A.; Darian, E.K.; Afzali, H.; Amirkhani, M.A.; Razzaghi, M.; Naser, R.; Amiri, A.B.; Alimohammadi, A.; Nikkhah, N.; Zare, S. Role of cultured skin fibroblasts in regenerative dermatology. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 2022, 46, 1463–1471.
  12. Limura, E.; Giordano, P. Modern treatment of anal fistula. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 21, 12–20.
  13. Asteria, C.R.; Ficari, F.; Bagnoli, S.; Milla, M.; Tonelli, F. Treatment of perianal fistulas in Crohn’s disease by local injection of antibody to TNF-alpha accounts for a favorable clinical response in selected cases: A pilot study. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2006, 41, 1064–1072.
  14. Shelley-Fraser, G.; Borley, N.R.; Warren, B.F.; Shepherd, N.A. The connective tissue changes of Crohn’s disease. Histopathology 2012, 60, 1034–1044.
  15. Iftodiy, A.; Kozlovska, I.; Davydenko, I.; Tiuleneva, E.; Besedinska, E. Morphogenesis of the anoderm structural changes in patients with chronic anal fistulas. Georgian Med. News 2015, 246, 26–30.
  16. Lee, J.M.; Kim, N.K. Essential anatomy of the anorectum for colorectal surgeons focused on the gross anatomy and histologic findings. Ann. Coloproctol. 2018, 34, 59–71.
  17. Mistriotis, P.; Andreadis, S.T. Hair follicle: A novel source of multipotent stem cells for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2013, 19, 265–278.
  18. Regulski, M.J. Cellular senescence: What, why, and how. Wounds 2017, 29, 168–174.
  19. Barnhoorn, M.; van der Meulen-de Jong, A.; Schrama, E.; Plug, L.G.; Verspaget, H.W.; Fibbe, W.E.; van Pel, M.; Hawinkels, L.; Schepers, K. Cytokine mixtures mimicking the local milieu in patents with inflammatory bowel disease impact phenotype and function of mesenchymal stromal cells. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2022, 11, 932–945.
  20. Wei, X.; Li, M.; Zheng, Z.; Ma, J.; Gao, Y.; Chen, L.; Peng, Y.; Yang, L. Senescence in chronic wounds and potential targeted therapies. Burn. Trauma 2022, 10, tkab045.
  21. Bellini, E.; Grieco, M.; Raposio, E. The science behind autologous fat grafting. Ann. Med. Surg. 2017, 24, 65–73.
  22. Centurion, P. Rediscovering the involuted regenerative system? Aesth. Plast. Surg. 2022, 46, 1510–1512.
  23. Mailey, B.; Baker, J.; Hosseini, A.; Alfonso, Z.; Strasser, P.; Hicok, K.; Cohen, S.; Gosman, A.; Dobke, M.; Wallace, A.M. Adipose derived stem cell count is influenced by receipt of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2014, 133 (Suppl. S3), 147.
  24. Chen, X.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Z.; Dong, Z.; Yao, Y.; Li, Y.; Lai, Q.; Xia, J.; Guan, J.; Wang, X.; et al. Adipose-derived stem cells regulate CD4+ T-cell mediated macrophage polarization and fibrosis in fat grafting in a mouse model. Heliyon 2022, 8, e11538.
  25. Schreiter, J.S.; Langer, S.; Kloting, N.; Kurow, O. Leptin promotes adipocytes survival in non-vascularized fat grafting via perfusion increase. Microvasc. Res. 2021, 135, 104131.
  26. Brembilla, N.; Vuagnat, H.; Boehncke, W.H.; Krause, K.H.; Preynat-Seauve, O. Adipose-derived stromal cells for chronic wounds: Scientific evidence and roadmap towards clinical practice. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2023, 12, 17–25.
  27. Jones, I.T.; Fazio, V.W.; Jagelman, D.G. The use of transanal rectal advancement flaps in the management of fistulas involving the anorectum. Dis. Colon. Rectum. Dec. 1987, 30, 919–923.
  28. Irvine, E.J. Usual therapy improves perianal Crohn’s disease as measured by a new disease activity index. McMaster IBD Study Group. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 1995, 20, 27–32.
  29. Slevin, S.M.; Egan, L.J. New insights into the mechanism of action of anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha monoclonal antibodies in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2015, 12, 2909–2920.
  30. Chakravarti, D.; Lee, R.; Multani, A.S.; Santoni, A.; Keith, Z.; Hsu, W.H.; Chang, K.; Reyes, L.; Rashid, A.; Wu, C.J.; et al. Telomere dysfunction instigates inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2024853118.
  31. Kardeh, S. Telomere targeting is insufficient to ameliorate multifaceted hallmarks of aging in cultured keratinocytes. Burns 2022, 48, 470–471.
  32. Chen, X.; Tang, J.; Shuai, W.; Meng, J.; Feng, J.; Han, Z. Macrophage polarization and its role in the pathogenesis of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Inflamm. Res. 2020, 69, 883–895.
  33. Tavakoli, S.; Kisiel, M.A.; Biederman, T.; Klar, A.S. Immunomodulation of skin repair: Cell-based therapeutic strategies for skin replacement (A comprehensive review). Biomedicines 2022, 10, 118.
  34. Taylor, M.; Kelechi, T.; Prentice, M.; Logan, A. Wound Care: A homeopathic approach. Med. Surg. Nurs. 2018, 27, 239–258.
  35. Hekmatpou, D.; Mehrabi, F.; Rahzani, K.; Aminiyan, A. The effect of aloe vera clinical trials on prevention and healing of skin wound: A systematic review. Iran. J. Med. Sci. 2019, 44, 1.
  36. Biglari, B.; Moghaddam, A.; Santos, K.; Blaser, G.; Buchler, A.; Jansen, G.; Langler, A.; Graf, A.; Weiler, U.; Licht, V.; et al. Multicentre prospective observational study on professional wound care using honey (Medihoney). Int. Wound J. 2012, 10, 252–259.
  37. Narauskaite, D.; Vydmantaite, G.; Rusteikaite, J.; Sampath, R.; Rudyatite, A.; Stasyte, G.; Calvente, M.I.; Jekabsone, A. Extracellular vesicles in skin wound healing. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 811.
More
Information
Subjects: Surgery
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : , , ,
View Times: 285
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 27 Feb 2023
1000/1000