1. Introduction
One of the most fundamental topics in modern organogermanium chemistry is the study of low-coordinate species, and within this realm, the field of multiply bonded compounds is now one of the mainstreams. It therefore comes as no surprise that the literature covering the latter field is vast. Heteronuclear multiply bonded combinations of germanium with the Main Group elements of groups 13, 15, and 16, >Ge=E13–, >Ge=E15–, and >Ge=E16, respectively, are excluded from the consideration. Moreover, numerous compounds, in which the low-coordinate Ge center is intramolecularly (by n-donor substituents) or intermolecularly (through external donor ligands) coordinated, thus experiencing remarkable electronic perturbation, are also not considered, except for silagermenylidenes >Si=Ge(NHC): and digermanium(0) complexes :Ge0(NHC/or NHSi)=Ge0(NHC/or NHSi):, which otherwise cannot be stabilized for their isolation.
2. Heavy Analogues of Alkenes
2.1. Homonuclear Derivatives
2.1.1. Digermenes >Ge=Ge<
Acyclic Digermenes
The very first isolable digermene, namely tetra(alkyl)digermene Dis
2Ge=GeDis
2 [Dis = CH(SiMe
3)
2]
1, reported by Lappert and coworkers in 1976, was synthesized by the reaction of bis(amino)germylene [(Me
3Si)
2N]
2Ge: with DisLi
[1], and its crystal structure was reported ten years later (Scheme 1)
[2]. Dimeric was in the solid state (as was confirmed by X-ray diffraction study), and digermene
1 dissociated in solution into a pair of monomeric germylenes Dis
2Ge:, thus implying the easy breaking of the weak Ge=Ge double bond (Scheme 1). Remarkably, crystallographic studies revealed that the Ge=Ge bond in
1 was notably short (
rGe=Ge = 2.347(2) Å) and not twisted, the geometry around both Ge centers was pyramidal (
ΣGe = 348.5°), and the Dis-substituents at the Ge=Ge double bond were arranged in a
trans-bent fashion (
θ = 32°).
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the first isolable digermene Dis2Ge=GeDis2 1.
Since 1976, numerous digermenes have been isolated and, in the majority of cases, structurally characterized, with most of these cases being reported after 2000. The synthetic strategies toward stable digermenes can be categorized into the four main approaches: (1) photolysis of cyclotrigermanes (route A); (2) reduction of dihalo- or monohalogermylenes with Grignard or organolithium reagents (route B); (3) reductive dehalogenation of 1,1-dihalogermanes (route C); and (4) 1,2-addition or cycloaddition to digermynes (route D) (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2. General methods for the synthesis of isolable digermenes.
Route
A (photolysis of hexaarylcyclotrigermanes) is mostly of a historical importance as the method employed by Masamune and coworkers for preparation of the first stable tetra(aryl)digermenes Ar
2Ge=GeAr
2 [3]. However, because of the synthetic limitations of this approach, which requires cyclotrogermane precursors that are not readily available, currently this method is not commonly used. Since 2000, there was only one report from the Baines group on an improved synthetic procedure for the tetra(mesityl)digermene Mes
2Ge=GeMes
2 2 that was generated by photolysis of hexa(mesityl)cyclotrigermane precursor in THF at −70 °C
[4].
According to approach
B, the reduction of isolable di(halo)germylenes X
2Ge:/(X
2Ge:–dioxane complex) or mono(halo)germylenes X(R)Ge: with Grignard RMgX or organolithium RLi reagents generates at first transient germylenes R
2Ge: that dimerize forming digermenes R
2Ge=GeR
2, and this method was used for the preparation of Lappert’s germylene Dis
2Ge=GeDis
2 1 [1][2]. Since 2000, a few other isolable digermenes were prepared by method
B: Ar(R)Ge=Ge(Ar)R [R = Me, Et, Ph; Ar = 2,6-(2,4,6-
iPr
3-C
6H
2)
2-C
6H
3]
3a–
c [5], [Me
3Si–C≡C](Ar′)Ge=Ge[C≡C–SiMe
3]Ar′ [Ar′ = 2,6-(2,6-
iPr
2-C
6H
3)
2-C
6H
3]
4 [6], Ar*Ge=GeAr* [Ar* = 2,5-
tBu
2-C
6H
3]
5 [7], Bbt(Br)Ge=Ge(Bbt)Br [Bbt = 2,6-[(Me
3Si)
2CH]
2-4-[(Me
3Si)
3C]-C
6H
2]
6 (equilibrating in solution with the monomeric germylene Bbt(Br)Ge:)
[8], and Tbb(Br)Ge=Ge(Tbb)Br [Tbb = 2,6-[(Me
3Si)
2CH]
2-4-
tBu-C
6H
2]
7 [9]. A donor-acceptor Lewis base–Lewis acid digermene complex {[(OC)
5W]←:GeH
2–H
2Ge←[:IPr]} [IPr = 1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-2
H-imidazol-2-ylidene]
8 was also prepared, featuring however single (instead of double) germanium–germanium bond, being therefore not classified as a true digermene
[10].
Reductive dehalogenation of 1,1-di(halo)germanes (method
C) is by far the most popular protocol for synthesis of stable digermenes, due to the ready availability of the starting R
2GeX
2. Using this approach, the synthesis and crystal structure of the following digermenes were reported: (R
3Si)
2Ge=Ge(SiR
3)
2 [R
3Si = SiMe
2tBu]
9 [11][12], Tbt(Mes)Ge=Ge(Tbt)Mes [Tbt = 2,4,6-[(Me
3Si)
2CH]
3-C
6H
2]
10 [13], Fc(Tip)Ge=Ge(Fc)Tip [Tip = 2,4,6-
iPr
3-C
6H
2, Fc = ferrocenyl]
11 [10]. In tetra(aryl)digermene
10, the strong repulsive interaction of the bulky aryl substituents caused the room-temperature dissociation of the Ge=Ge bond into the corresponding germylenes Tbt(Mes)Ge:, as was monitored by UV–Vis spectroscopy (Δ
H = 14.7 ± 0.2 kcal/mol, Δ
S = 42.4 ± 0.8 cal/mol·deg)
[14].
Method
D, namely 1,2-addition or cycloaddition across the Ge≡Ge triple bond of digermynes, is the latest approach toward digermenes that was enabled by the recent availability of the stable digermynes. This approach is exemplified by the preparation of Ar′(H)Ge=Ge(Ar′)H [Ar′ = 2,6-(2,6-
iPr
2-C
6H
3)
2-C
6H
3]
12 [15] (which is also available by method
B [16]) and Ar′(H)Ge=Ge(Ar′)R [Ar′ = 2,6-(2,6-
iPr
2-C
6H
3)
2-C
6H
3, R = cyclopentyl]
13 [17]. Using method
D, several compounds with a Ge–Ge bond were classified as digermenes
[18][19][20]. However, given their remarkably long (even longer than many Ge–Ge single bonds) and accordingly quite weak Ge=Ge bonds, this classification is somewhat doubtful.
Below, some recently published representative examples of the stable digermenes are described.
Thus, employing method
C, Lee, Sekiguchi and coworkers reported the tetra(silyl)digermene (
tBu
2MeSi)
2Ge=Ge(SiMe
tBu
2)
2 14, featuring very bulky substituents, that was readily available in large-scale by the reductive dehalogenation of the (
tBu
2MeSi)
2GeCl
2 precursor with potassium graphite
[21][22][23]. In the solid state, digermene
14 manifested a quite unusual combination of the structural features, namely a very long [
rGe=Ge = 2.346(2) Å] and exceptionally twisted (
τ = 52.8°) Ge=Ge double bond, nevertheless featuring practically planar geometry at its sp
2-Ge centers (
ΣGe = 358.8 and 359.2°)
[21][22]. In solution, digermene
14 has a very distinct deep sapphire-blue color, in contrast to all other isolable digermenes that are yellow, orange, or red. Accordingly, its longest wavelength UV band was observed at 618 nm [
π(HOMO)–
π*(LUMO)], a value that was extraordinarily red-shifted compared to those of other stable digermenes
[21][22]. This was caused by the extreme twisting of the Ge=Ge double bond due to the severe steric repulsion of bulky silyl substituents, resulting in rather poor 4
pπ(Ge)–4
pπ(Ge) orbital overlap, destabilization of the HOMO, and accordingly to the overall decrease in the HOMO–LUMO energy gap. Moreover, exceptional twisting of the Ge=Ge bond in
14 results in its partial breaking and progressively increasing biradical contribution. Digermene
14 does not dissociate in solution into the germylenes (
tBu
2MeSi)
2Ge:, maintaining its structural integrity up to 80 °C, as confirmed by Raman and UV–Vis spectroscopy measurements, as well as trapping reactions study
[21][22][23]. Nevertheless,
14 can behave as a germylene source when strongly nucleophilic Lewis bases (isocyanide or
ortho-benzoquinone) are applied, forming germylene reactivity products although not involving “free” germylenes into the reaction process
[21][22]. CV measurement of digermene
14 in
ortho-dichlorobenzene in the presence of [
nBu
4N][B(C
6F
5)
4] inert electrolyte afforded two reversible redox couples, for both oxidation and reduction processes, with
E1/2(ox) = 0.38 V and
E1/2(red) = −1.50 V
[22]. This implies that both cation-radical
[4]+∙ and anion-radical
[4]−∙ are persistent under the CV measurement conditions.
Scheschkewitz and coworkers synthesized tetra(silyl)digermene
15 by dimerization of a cyclic germylene–NHC complex (
Scheme 3)
[24]. The exocyclic Ge=Ge bond in
15 revealed structural features that are typical for digermenes: short bond [
rGe=Ge = 2.2944(4) Å], strongly pyramidalized Ge centers [
ΣGe = 334.5°], and
trans-bending of the silyl-substituents [
θ = 37.7°]. Accordingly, digermene
15 was stable both in the solid state and in solution.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of the tetra(silyl)digermene 15.
The same group also recently reported the first isolable digermenide Tip
2Ge=Ge(Tip)Li
16 made by the reduction of Tip
2GeCl
2 with metallic lithium
[25]. In this anionic digermene, the Ge=Ge double bond is short [
rGe=Ge = 2.284(6) Å], unremarkably
trans-bent (
θ = 7.1/12.8°), and twisted (
τ = 19.9°). Digermenide
16 can be further functionalized at the anionic Ge site forming novel silyl-substituted digermenes Tip
2Ge=Ge(Tip)R (R = SiMe
3 [25], SiPhMe
2 [25], SiPh
3 [26], SiMe
2Cl
[26], SiMePhCl
[26], and SiPh
2Cl
[26]) and even persistent (acyl)digermenes Tip
2Ge=Ge(Tip)[C(O)R] (R =
tBu
[26], 2-methylbutan-2-yl
[26], 1-adamantyl
[26]).
Matsuo, Sasamori and coworkers prepared 1,2-di(halo)digermenes Eind(X)Ge=Ge(X)Eind (X = Cl, Br)
17a,b (a: X = Cl, b: X = Br) by the redistribution of stable di(aryl)germylene Eind
2Ge: and GeX
2∙dioxane complex
[27]. Bearing electronegative substituents,
17a,b expectedly revealed strong structural deformation at the Ge=Ge double bond:
trans-bending of substituents (
θ = 44.3/43.3°) and pyramidalization at the Ge centers (
ΣGe = 335.9 and 337.1°). In line with this, the Ge=Ge bond in
17a,
b is rather long [
rGe=Ge = 2.4119(5) and 2.4145(3) Å], as a manifestation of the weak bonding between Ge atoms, which was translated into the ready dissociation of this bond. Accordingly, in solution, di(halo)digermenes Eind(X)Ge=Ge(X)Eind dissociate to (halo)germylenes Eind(X)Ge:.
Dicationic derivative
18, which can be viewed as a digermene with cationic imidazolium substituents, as reported by Aldridge and coworkers, was synthesized by the reaction of a (chloro)germylene–NHC complex with either Na{B[3,5-(CF
3)
2-C
6H
3]
4} or Li{Al[OC(CF
3)
3]
4} (Scheme 4)
[28]. In
18, the Ge=Ge bond is short [
rGe=Ge = 2.300(2) Å], and Ge centers are only insignificantly pyramidalized (
ΣGe = 353.1 and 353.6°). Exchanging in
18 NHC substituents for Me
4-NHC and boryl substituents for Ar-groups [Ar = 2,6-Mes
2-C
6H
3 (Mes = 2,4,6-Me
3-C
6H
2)], the same group synthesized another dicationic digermene
19 manifesting longer Ge=Ge distance of 2.380(1) Å
[29].
Scheme 4. Synthesis of the dicationic digermene 18.
Very recently, Scheschkewitz and coworkers found that the thermolysis (benzene, 65 °C, 18 h) of the unsymmetrically substituted digermene Tip
2Ge=Ge(Tip)[SiR
2Dma] (R = Me, Ph; Dma = 2-Me
2N-C
6H
4) produced a mixture of redistribution products, Tip
2Ge=GeTip
2 and
trans-[DmaR
2Si](Tip)Ge=Ge(SiR
2Dma)Tip
20 [Ge=Ge bond (for R = Me):
rGe=Ge = 2.2576(5) Å,
θ = 21.5°,
τ = 0°]
[30]. This approach was then applied toward the development of ADMET (acyclic diene metathesis) polymerization of digermenes. Accordingly, thermolysis (benzene, 65 °C, 48 h) of a diene with terminal digermene fragments linked by a
p-phenylene spacer, Tip
2Ge=Ge(Tip)–SiMe
2–1,4-[2,5-(Me
2N)
2-C
6H
2]–SiMe
2–Ge(Tip)=GeTip
2 21 [Ge=Ge bonds:
rGe=Ge = 2.3038(4) Å,
θ = 24.9/31.9°,
τ = 18.0°], formed ADMET-polyene Tip
2Ge{=Ge(Tip)–SiMe
2–1,4-[2,5-(Me
2N)
2-C
6H
2]–SiMe
2–Ge(Tip)=}
nGeTip
2, with the number-average degree of polymerization being 23, mass-average degree of polymerization being 45, and dispersity index being 1.95.
In comparison to organic alkenes >C=C<, structural deformations of the double bond in digermenes >Ge=Ge< (stretching, trans-bending, and twisting) are even more pronounced compared to those of the corresponding disilenes >Si=Si<. The extent of these structural distortions in digermenes follows some general tendencies: electronegative substituents provoke notable elongation and weakening of the Ge=Ge bond, as well as trans-bending at the doubly bonded Ge centers, whereas electropositive substituents cause shortening and strengthening of the Ge=Ge bond and planarization at the doubly bonded Ge centers. Accordingly, the shortest Ge=Ge bond [rGe=Ge = 2.2576(5) Å] was found in the di(aryl)di(silyl)digermene 20, whereas the longest one [rGe=Ge = 2.5087(7) Å] was detected in the di(aryl)di(bromo)digermene 6, with the exceptionally bulky Bbt substituents. Moreover, in line with what was mentioned above, tetra(silyl)digermene 9 has planar (the least trans-bent) geometry at its sp2-Ge centers (θ = 0.3°), whereas the greatest trans-bending was observed in the di(aryl)digermene 12 (θ = 45.0°). Twisting in digermenes is controlled by the substituent effect, to range from non-twisted Ge=Ge double bonds (τ = 0.0° in tetra(alkyl)digermene 1 and di(aryl)di(silyl)digermene 20) to extraordinarily twisted (τ = 52.8° in tetra(silyl)digermene 14 with very bulky silyl substituents).
Cyclic Digermenes
To date, 22 neutral organogermanium compounds featuring an endocyclic Ge=Ge double bond, 14 three-membered rings, 4 four-membered rings, 3 five-membered rings, and 1 six-membered ring, are reported.
Three-Membered Ring Compounds
There are currently 14 heavy cyclopropene analogues incorporating a Ge=Ge double bond into the three-membered ring: 12 homonuclear cyclotrigermenes cyclo-[Ge3] and 2 heteronuclear 1H-siladigermirenes cyclo-[Si–Ge=Ge]. Unlike their acyclic congeners, all of these cyclic digermenes are synthesized by special methods which are not outlined in Scheme 2.
The first isolable cyclotrigermenes
22a,
b were synthesized by Sekiguchi and coworkers by the reaction of
tBu
3EM (a: E = Si, M = Na; b: E = Ge, M = Li) with GeCl
2•diox (Scheme 5)
[31]. Remarkably, one-electron oxidation of
22a with [Ph
3C]
+[BPh
4]
− produced tris(tri-
tert-butylsilyl)cyclotrigermenylium tetraphenylborate [(
tBu
3Si)
3Ge
3]
+[BPh
4]
−, as the germanium analogue of aromatic 2
π-electron cyclopropenylium ion
[32].
Scheme 5. Synthesis of the first cyclotrigermenes 22a,b.
Unsymmetrically substituted cyclotrigermenes
23a–
e (a: R = Si
tBu
3; b: R = Ge
tBu
3; c: R = Si(SiMe
3)
3; d: R = Ge(SiMe
3)
3; e: R = Mes) were later reported by the same authors prepared by the reaction of tris(tri-
tert-butylsilyl)cyclotrigermenylium tetrakis[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate with the alkali metal salts RM (R = silyl, germyl, aryl; M = alkali metal) (Scheme 6)
[33]. Likewise, treatment of (tri-
tert-butylsilyl)cyclotrigermenylium tetrakis(2,3,5,6-tetrafluorophenyl)borate with potassium halides KX (X = Cl, Br, I) formed halogen-substituted cyclotrigermenes
24a–
c (a: X = Cl, b: X = Br; c: X = I) (Scheme 7)
[34].
Scheme 6. Synthesis of the unsymmetrically substituted cyclotrigermenes 23a–e.
Scheme 7. Synthesis of the halogen-substituted cyclotrigermenes 24a–c.
Lee, Sekiguchi, and coworkers reported novel three-membered ring cyclic digermenes, 1
H-siladigermirene
25a and 1
H-trigermirene (cyclotrigermene)
25b, synthesized by the reaction of 1,1,2,2-tetra(chloro)digermane R–GeCl
2–GeCl
2–R (R = SiMe
tBu
2) with 1,1-di(lithio)silane R
2SiLi
2 or 1,1-di(lithio)germane R
2GeLi
2, respectively (Scheme 8)
[35][36].
Scheme 8. Synthesis of 1H-siladigermirene 25a and 1H-trigermirene 25b.
In due course, the solid-state thermolysis of the tetra(silyl)digermene (
tBu
2MeSi)
2Ge=Ge(SiMe
tBu
2)
2 1427 (170 °C, 1 h, evacuated sealed tube) was found to be an attractive alternative to the above-described preparation of 1
H-trigermirene
25b, improving the isolated yield of the latter up to 48%
[37].
The alkyl-substituted heavy cyclopropene analogues
26a,
b (a: E = Si; b: E = Ge), representing the nearest homologues of the above-described 1
H-siladigermirene
25a and 1
H-trigermirene
25b, being distinguished from them by only one CH
2-unit, were prepared by Lee, Sekiguchi, and coworkers by the reductive dehalogenation of 1,3-di(chloro)cyclobutane derivatives (Scheme 9)
[38]. The overall process was proposed to proceed via the transient bicyclo[1.1.0]butane derivatives, rapidly isomerizing at room temperature to the more stable heavy cyclopropenes
26a,
b.
Scheme 9. Synthesis of the alkyl-substituted heavy cyclopropene analogues 26a,b.
In cyclotrigermenes, the Ge=Ge double bonds [
rGe=Ge = 2.239(4)–2.2743(8) Å] are typically shorter than those of acyclic digermenes [
rGe=Ge = 2.2576(5)–2.5087(7) Å]. The longest Ge=Ge bonds were detected in halogen-substituted cyclotrigermenes
24a–
c [
rGe=Ge = 2.2721(6)–2.2743(8) Å], and they were realized in terms of
πGe=Ge–
σ*
Ge–X orbitals mixing facilitated by the electronegative halogen atoms X at the
sp3-Ge
[34]. Usually, cyclotrigermenes exhibited significant twisting about their Ge=Ge double bonds:
τ = 8.1–51.0°. Cyclotrigermene
25b with very bulky
tBu
2MeSi substituents showed a record twisting for the endocyclic Ge=Ge bond in heavy cyclopropenes (
τ = 60.5°)
[36].
Four neutral cyclobutene derivatives containing heavy group 14 elements and incorporating Ge=Ge double bond are currently known: one homonuclear (tetragermetene cyclo-[Ge4]) and three heteronuclear (disiladigermetene cyclo-[Si2Ge2], trigermetene cyclo-[Ge3C], and digermetene cyclo-[Ge2C2]).
The very first compound of this type, namely disiladigermetene
27, was reported by Lee, Sekiguchi, and coworkers, formed by the unexpected ring expansion of either 3
H- or 1
H-disilagermirenes
[39] with GeCl
2•diox (Scheme 10)
[40]. The Ge=Ge double bond in
27 [
rGe=Ge = 2.2911(4) Å] is one of the longest reported for the cyclic digermenes, whereas the endocyclic Si–Ge bonds are sizably shortened, and the exocyclic Si–Cl bonds are elongated. This was explained by the important extent of
πGe=Ge–
σ*
Si–Cl negative hyperconjugation promoted by the presence of electronegative chlorine atoms and folding of the Si
2Ge
2-ring (folding angle = 28.3°). The geometry around the sp
2-Ge atoms in
27 is only slightly pyramidal:
ΣGe = 357.2°/358.6°.
Scheme 10. Synthesis of disiladigermetene 27.
Likewise, Lee, Sekiguchi, and coworkers found that the similar reaction of 1
H-trigermirene
25b with the GeCl
2•diox yielded the first (and still the only known) homonuclear heavy cyclobutene analogue, tetragermetene
28 (Scheme 11)
[41]. Structurally, tetragermetene
28 is similar to the above-described disiladigermetene
27:
rGe=Ge = 2.2993(5) Å (
28) vs. 2.2911(4) (
27), and
ΣGe = 354.4°/356.4° (
28) vs. 357.2°/358.6° (
27).
Scheme 11. Synthesis of tetragermetene 28.
Weidenbruch and coworkers developed an alternative approach toward heavy cyclobutene analogues by reacting tetra(germa)buta-1,3-diene Tip
2Ge=Ge(Tip)–Ge(Tip)=GeTip
2 with 2-methoxyphenyl isocyanide to produce 1,2,3-trigermet-1-ene
29, featuring a germanium–germanium double bond within the Ge
3C-skeleton (Scheme 12)
[42]. The Ge=Ge bond in
29 was marginally shorter that those in disiladigermetene
27 and tetragermetene
28: 2.2808(7) Å vs. 2.2911(4) and 2.2993(5) Å, respectively.
Scheme 12. Synthesis of 1,2,3-trigermet-1-ene 29.
The four-membered ring 1,2-digermet-1-ene
30 with an endocyclic Ge=Ge double bond was prepared by Sasamori, Tokitoh, and coworkers by [2 + 2] cycloaddition of the stable digermyne BbtGe≡GeBbt (Bbt = 2,6-[(Me
3Si)
2CH]
2-4-[(Me
3Si)
3C]-C
6H
2) and ethylene, (Scheme 13)
[43]. In
30, its remarkable ring strain and
trans-bending of the substituents (
θ = 39.5 and 39.7°) caused elongation and weakening of the Ge=Ge double bond [
rGe=Ge = 2.4132(5) Å].
Scheme 13. Synthesis of 1,2-digermet-1-ene 30.
Except for the above-described neutral heavy cyclobutene analogues
27–
30, there are several four-membered ring compounds where the Ge=Ge double bond is a part of the tri(germa)allylic system (cationic, radical, or anionic). Thus, Weidenbruch and coworkers reported the tetra(germa)cyclobutenyl anion
31 unexpectedly produced by exhaustive reduction of Tip
2Ge=GeTip
2 with excess of lithium (Scheme 14)
[44]. In
31, the Ge
4-ring is practically planar (sum of the internal bond angles = 360°), and within the tri(germa)allylic system, the Ge–Ge bonds length of 2.3679(6) Å is just in-between those of the typical Ge–Ge single and Ge=Ge double bonds.
Scheme 14. Synthesis of tetra(germa)cyclobutenyl anion 31.
Cyclic compound
31 can be directly compared with acyclic tri(germa)allyl anion derivative
32, reported by Power and coworkers and prepared by the reductive ring opening of a cyclotrigermenyl radical
33 with KC
8 (Scheme 15)
[45]. The germanium–germanium bond length [2.422(2) Å] in
32 is also intermediate between those of the Ge–Ge single and Ge=Ge double bonds, and the Ge
3-array is characterized by a wide Ge–Ge–Ge bond angle [159.19(10)°].
Scheme 15. Synthesis of tri(germa)allyl anion 32.
Most recently, Lee, Sekiguchi, and coworkers synthesized silatri(germa)cyclobutenylium ion derivative
34 by the oxidative demethylation of the cyclotrigermene
25b [35] with [Et
3Si]
+∙[B(C
6F
5)
4]
− (Scheme 16)
[46]. In
34, the SiGe
3 four-membered ring is strongly folded (folding angle 40.4°), thus enabling Ge2∙∙∙Ge3
through-space orbital interaction manifested in the short transannular Ge2–Ge3 distance of only 2.9346(3) Å. Overall, the structural peculiarities of
34 (ring folding and short transannular distance) testify to the important extent of its homoaromaticity. Accordingly,
34 is to be classified as a germanium analogue of the cyclobutenylium ion, i.e., a
homo-tri(germa)cyclopropenylium ion. The homoaromaticity of
34 was further confirmed by the calculation of the nucleus-independent chemical shift (NICS) at 1 Å above the Ge
3-ring center, which was diagnostically negative (−17.3) as a manifestation of the diatropic ring current. The “homoaromatization energy” of
34, calculated as the barrier to inversion of the Ge
3Si-ring (through the planar allylic-type cationic transition state lacking homoaromatic stabilization), was exceedingly low, i.e., only 3.7 kcal/mol
[46]. In accordance with its homoaromaticity,
34 showed practically no alteration in the Ge–Ge bond lengths of its Ge
3-fragment [
rGe=Ge = 2.3327(3) Å (Ge1–Ge2) and 2.3400(3) Å (Ge1–Ge3)], and it showed essentially planar geometry at all skeletal Ge atoms [
ΣGe = 360.0° (Ge1), 358.7° (Ge2), and 357.5° (Ge3)].
Scheme 16. Synthesis of silatri(germa)cyclobutenylium ion derivative 34.
Upon the one-electron reduction of
34 with KC
8, a free-radical species, namely silatri(germa)cyclobutenyl radical
35, was cleanly formed (Scheme 16)
[46]. The homoaromaticity of
34 is completely lost upon its reduction, which was seen in the remarkable flattening of the SiGe
3-ring in
35 (folding angle was reduced from 40.4° in the starting
34 to only 6.9° in the resulting
35) and great elongation of the Ge2∙∙∙Ge3 transannular distance [3.3315(4) Å in
35, or 14% elongation compared with
34]. Thus,
35 is to be classified as the allylic free radical, featuring the unpaired electron delocalized over the two terminal Ge atoms, [∙Ge2–Ge1=Ge3 ↔ Ge2=Ge1–Ge3∙]. Accordingly, the lengths of both Ge–Ge bonds in
35 are intermediate between those for the single and double bonds [2.3458(3) Å (Ge1–Ge2) and 2.3206(3) Å (Ge1–Ge3)], and all Ge atoms maintain essential planarity of their geometry upon reduction [
ΣGe = 358.6° (Ge1), 355.2° (Ge2), and 359.9° (Ge3)]. The EPR resonance
g-value of
35 (2.0227) is in the range typical for the silyl-substituted Ge-centered free radicals. In the Ge
3-unit of
35, the hyperfine coupling constants (hfcc) for the terminal Ge nuclei are markedly greater than that for the central Ge nucleus:
a(
73Ge2) [or
a(
73Ge3)] = 1.54 mT [or 1.44 mT] vs.
a(
73Ge1) = 0.59 mT. This observation agrees well with the allylic radical formulation of
35, in which the odd electron is mostly localized at the Ge2 and Ge3 termini. Given that the small values of the
73Ge hfcc in
35 imply the location of its unpaired electron in the orbital of
π-symmetry,
35 should be categorized as a
π-radical. The allylic free radical
35 can be compared with the cyclotrigermenyl radical
33 prepared by Power and coworkers by the stoichiometric reduction of the aryl(chloro)germylene Ar(Cl)Ge: [Ar = 2,6-(2,4,6-Me
3-C
6H
2)
2-C
6H
3] with KC
8 (
Scheme 15)
[45]. In the cyclotrigermenyl radical
33, the average Ge–Ge bond distance within the Ge
3-ring of 2.35(7) Å is comparable with those of the silatri(germa)cyclobutenyl radical
35 [2.3458(3) Å and 2.3206(3) Å]. The EPR characteristics of
33 are also comparable to those of
35:
g = 2.0069 [2.0227 in
35], and
a(
73Ge) = 1.6 mT [
a(
73Ge2) or
a(
73Ge3) = 1.54 or 1.44 mT in
35].
Three compounds of this type with the Ge=Ge double bond within the five-membered ring skeleton have been reported to date. Weidenbruch and coworkers synthesized the first two representatives by [1 + 4] cycloaddition of sulfur/or selenium to the tetra(germa)buta-1,3-diene Tip
2Ge=Ge(Tip)–Ge(Tip)=GeTip
2, forming thia- or selena-tetra(germa)cyclopentenes
36a,
b (Scheme 17)
[42][47]. The structural features of heavy cyclopentenes
36a,
b are typical for the cyclic digermenes:
rGe=Ge = 2.2841(5) Å (
36a) and 2.2975(5) Å (
36b), and
ΣGe = 348.4°/351.4° (
36a) and 349.2°/349.9° (
36b); and Ge
4E rings are practically planar (sums of the internal bond angles are 539.5° (
36a) and 537.7° (
36b)).
Scheme 17. Synthesis of heavy cyclopentene analogues 36a,b with endocyclic Ge=Ge double bonds.
The latest example of the five-membered ring cyclic digermene, namely bicyclic digermene
37 with a bridging Ge=Ge double bond, was prepared by Marschner and coworkers; it was unexpectedly formed by the reaction of 1,3-di(potassio)trisilane with GeBr
2∙dioxane and PEt
3 (Scheme 18)
[48]. In
37, the Ge=Ge double bond revealed the structural parameters that are characteristic for the cyclic digermenes: shortened bond [
rGe=Ge = 2.2663(9) Å], negligible
trans-bending of substituents [
θ = 2.5°], and moderate twisting [
τ = 16.2°]. Upon its electrochemical (CV) reduction, digermene
37 showed two reversible reduction waves corresponding to generation of anion-radical and dianion.
Scheme 18. Synthesis of bicyclic digermene 37.
Only one “heavy cyclohexene” derivative has been reported to date. Marschner and coworkers prepared this tetracyclic digermene
38 with an endocyclic Ge=Ge double bond bridging polycyclic scaffold (Scheme 19)
[48]. Digermene
38 was available via the synthetic strategy applied for the preparation of the above-described bicyclic digermene
37, namely by the reaction of 1,4-di(potassio)cyclohexasilane with GeBr
2∙dioxane in the presence of PEt
3. The metric parameters of
38 are comparable to those of
37:
rGe=Ge = 2.2896(6) Å,
θ = 2.1/8.3°, and
τ = 5.2°.
Scheme 19. Synthesis of tetracyclic digermene 38.
2.2. Heteronuclear Derivatives
2.2.1. Germenes >Ge=C<
The first isolable germenes were independently synthesized in 1987 by the groups of Berndt and Escudié. Berndt and coworkers prepared germenes
39a,
b by the coupling of electrophilic “cryptocarbene” and bis(amino)germylenes (Scheme 20)
[49]. The formulation of
39a,
b as germenes Ge=C was supported by the observation of low-field resonance for their doubly bonded C atoms [
δ(
13C) = 115.0 ppm (
39a) and 93.2 ppm (
39b)] and rather short Ge=C bond [
rGe=C = 1.827(4) Å (
39a)]. The Ge=C double bond in
39a was significantly twisted [
τ = 36°], although the sp
2-Ge center featured a planar geometry [
ΣGe = 359.9°]. The spectroscopic and crystallographic data of
39 are indicative of the substantial contribution of the ylide resonance structure with a positive charge on the Ge atom and a negative charge delocalized over the B–C–B allylic fragment of the B
2C
2 four-membered ring (Scheme 20)
[49]. This was exemplified by the shielding of the B atoms [
δ(
11B) = 66.0 ppm (
39a) and 65.0 ppm (
39b)] and shortening of the cyclic sp
2-C–B bonds in
39a [
rC–B = 1.534(7)/1.523(6) Å].
Scheme 20. Synthesis of stable germenes 39a,b.
Escudié and coworkers applied another approach toward their stable dimesityl(fluorenylidene)germene
40: dehydrofluorination of the (fluorenyl)fluorogermane percursor by its lithiation with
tBuLi with subsequent elimination of LiF from the intermediate lithium salt (Scheme 21, R = R′ = Mes)
[50]. In
40, the Ge=C double bond of 1.803(4) Å (mean value for the two crystallographically independent molecules) was notably shorter than the typical Ge–C single bonds and even shorter than that in
39a, being practically undistorted [
ΣGe =
ΣC = 360.0°,
τ = 6°]
[51]. Except for the steric protection of the Ge=C bond by the bulky Mes groups, extra stabilization in
40 results from the contribution of the charge-separated Ge
δ+=C
δ− resonance form enabled by the effective aromatic delocalization of the negative charge over the cyclopentadiene fragment of the fluorenylidene group.
Scheme 21. Synthesis of stable germene 40.
Applying the same synthetic protocol, Escudié and coworkers prepared other stable germenes
40, as outlined in Scheme 21: R = R′ =Dis
[52]; R = Dis, R′ = Mes
[52]; R = R′ = fluorenyl
[53]; and R =
t-Bu, R′ = fluorenyl
[53]. They also reported generation of the halogen-substituted germenes (Me
5C
5)(X)Ge=CR
2 [CR
2 = fluorenylidene]
40 (Scheme 21: R = C
5Me
5; R′ = F, Cl) by
β-elimination of Me
3SiF from the (Me
5C
5)(X)FGe–(Me
3Si)CR
2 precursors
[54]. Lacking resonance stabilization, dimesityl(neopentyl)germene Mes
2Ge=CH–CH
2tBu
41 was synthesized by Couret and coworkers via the addition of
tBuLi to Mes
2(F)Ge–CH=CH
2, followed by
β-elimination of LiF from the intermediate lithium salt Mes
2(F)Ge–CH(Li)–CH
2tBu
[55].
A series of stable germenes
42–
44, prepared from a germylene Ar
2Ge: (Ar = 2-
tBu-4,5,6-Me
3-C
6H), were reported by Weidenbruch and coworkers (Scheme 22)
[7][56][57][58][59]. The germene
42, similar to Berndt’s germene
39a, disclosed a short [
rGe=C = 1.845(10) Å] and remarkably twisted [
τ = 33°] Ge=C bond, and planar geometry at both sp
2-Ge and sp
2-C atoms [
ΣGe =
ΣC = 359.9°]
[56]. The reaction of two equivalents of germylene Ar
2Ge: with two equivalents of phosphaalkyne
tBu–C≡P unexpectedly produced a germene
43 with an exocyclic Ge=C double bond [
rGe=C = 1.833(4) Å] (Scheme 22)
[57]. A series of bis(germenes) connected via acetylene spacer,
44a–
c, were synthesized by the double [1 + 2] cycloaddition of germylenes Ar
2Ge: to the C≡C bonds of bis(alkynes), followed by the ring-opening isomerization of the transient bis(germirenes) (Scheme 22)
[7][58][59]. The length of the Ge=C double bond in
44a–
c was in the range expected for germenes: 1.819(6) Å in
44a [7], 1.819(2) Å in
44b [58], and 1. 840(4) Å in
44c [59]. The observable conjugation between the terminal Ge=C bonds and the central C≡C bond in
44a–
c was seen in the diagnostic bathochromic shift of their longest wavelength UV absorptions [500 nm (
44a)
[7], 518 nm (
44b)
[58], and 595 nm (
44c)
[59], as well as in the shortening of the central C–C bonds in the Ge=C–C≡C fragments.
Scheme 22. Synthesis of germenes 42–44.
Two stable germenes, exemplifying the shortest and the longest extremes for the range of Ge=C bond lengths, are of particular interest. The germene with the shortest Ge=C double bond,
45, was prepared by Okazaki and coworkers by the reaction of di(aryl)germylene Tbt(Tip)Ge: (generated by the reduction of di(bromo)germane Tbt(Tip)GeBr
2 with lithium naphthalenide) with CS
2 (Scheme 23)
[60]. The length of the Ge=C double bond in
45 was only 1.771(16) Å, a value which was substantially smaller than those of Berndt’s germene
39a (1.827(4) Å)
[49] and Escudié’s germene
40 (1.803(4) Å)
[51]. Furthermore, the Ge=C bond in
45 showed no signs of structural distortion, exhibiting a trigonal-planar geometry at both sp
2-Ge and sp
2-C centers [
ΣGe = 359.7°,
ΣC = 360.0°] and a negligible twisting [
τ = 4°].
Scheme 23. Synthesis of the germene 45 with the shortest Ge=C double bond.
The germene
46 with the longest ever reported Ge=C bond [
rGe=C = 1.895(3) Å] was reported by Lee, Sekiguchi, and coworkers in 2002
[61]. This endocyclic Ge=C bond was embedded into the norbornene bicyclic skeleton of
46, which was unexpectedly formed by the reaction of 2,4-disila-1-germatricyclo[2.1.0.0
2,5]pentane cage
47 with benzaldehyde (Scheme 24). The major factor responsible for such extraordinary stretching of the germanium–carbon bond is most likely a steric repulsion between the bulky substituents. Nevertheless, despite this exceptional steric crowding around the double bond, the Ge=C bond in
46 revealed practically no structural deformations, neither pyramidalization at the doubly bonded Ge and C atoms nor twisting of the Ge=C bond:
ΣGe = 359.8°/
ΣC = 358.9°,
τ = 7.1°.
Scheme 24. Synthesis of the germene 46 with the longest Ge=C double bond.
The latest representative of isolable germenes, namely the first stable Brook-type germene
48 with an exocyclic Ge=C double bond, was prepared by Haas and coworkers
[62]. This
O-silylated germene
48 was prepared by the reaction of Me
3SiCl with the stable germenolate
49, predominantly exhibiting acyl germyl anion character with a negatively charged Ge, Ge–C single bond, and C=O double bond (Scheme 25). Spectroscopic and structural characteristics of
48 are typical for the isolable germenes: strongly deshielded sp
2-C atom [
δ(
13C) = 210.0 ppm]; short [
rGe=C = 1.835(2) Å], pyramidalized at Ge [
ΣGe = 351.7° (
cf.:
ΣC = 360.0°)], and twisted (torsional angles: O–C=Ge–Si = 10.0° and C
Mes–C=Ge–Si = 18.1°) Ge=C double bond.
Scheme 25. Synthesis of the Brook-type germene 48.
2.2.2. Silagermenes >Si=Ge<
The first ever reported silagermene, metastable Mes
2Si=GeMes
2, was thermally or photochemically generated from hexa(mesityl)siladigermirane precursor,
cyclo-(Mes
2Si–GeMes
2–GeMes
2), by Baines and coworker
[63]. Stable in solution only below −70 °C, Mes
2Si=GeMes
2 was identified by low-temperature NMR and UV measurements (
δ(
29Si) = 80.6 ppm and 414 nm (
πSi=Ge–
π*
Si=Ge), respectively), as well as by the quenching with methanol forming 1,2-addition product Mes
2Ge(H)–Si(OMe)Mes
2. Above −70 °C, Mes
2Si=GeMes
2 underwent irreversible 1,2-migration of Mes-group from Ge to Si generating transient mesityl(silyl)germylene Mes(Mes
3Si)Ge:.
The first isolable silagermene, 1
H-disilagermirene
50, with a cyclic Si=Ge double bond within the three-membered ring GeSi
2-skeleton, was reported by Lee, Sekiguchi, and coworkers in 2000
[39]. Moreover,
50 was quantitatively available from 3
H-disilagermirene precursor
51 by either thermal or photochemical isomerization, driven by the thermodynamic preference for the silagermene >Si=Ge< over the disilene >Si=Si< (Scheme 26). In
50, the sp
2-Si center was expectedly deshielded [
δ(
29Si) = 100.7 ppm], and the Si=Ge double bond was notably twisted (torsional angle R–Si=Ge–R = 40.3°).
Scheme 26. Synthesis of the first isolable silagermene 50.
Lee, Sekiguchi, and coworkers later developed another approach toward isolable silagermenes by the thermal isomerization of disilagermabicyclo[1.1.0]butane
52, forming novel 1
H-disilagermirene
53, as the nearest homologue of
50, distinguished from the latter by only a CH
2 unit (Scheme 27)
[38]. Compared to
50,
53 revealed a more deshielded sp
2-Si center:
δ(
29Si) = 100.7 ppm and 126.6 ppm, respectively. Bearing RCH
2-substituent at the sp
3-Si atom, 1
H-disilagermirene
53 is the first representative of the alkyl-substituted cyclopropene analogues of the heavy group 14 elements.
Scheme 27. Synthesis of alkyl-substituted 1H-disilagermirene 53.
The other three silagermenes, namely (
tBu
2MeSi)
2Si=GeMes
2 54 [64], Mes
2Si=Ge(SiMe
tBu
2)
2 55 [65], and (
tBu
3Si)
2Si=GeMes
2 56 [66], were available by the reaction of 1,1-di(lithio)derivatives (
tBu
2MeSi)
2SiLi
2, (
tBu
2MeSi)
2GeLi
2, and (
tBu
3Si)
2SiLi
2 with di(aryl)dichlorides Mes
2GeCl
2, Mes
2SiCl
2, and Mes
2GeCl
2, respectively. The silagermene
55 showed a characteristic low-field signal of its sp
2-Si atom [
δ(
29Si) = 146.9 ppm], whereas silagermenes
54 and
56 exhibited unusually shielded sp
2-Si centers [
δ(
29Si) = 22.4 ppm and 18.7 ppm, respectively]. This striking spectroscopic distinction resulted from the differing substitution pattern in
54 and
56 (donating groups on Si and withdrawing groups on Ge), which alters the natural Si
δ+=Ge
δ− bond polarity (like in
55) into a reversed one Si
δ−=Ge
δ+ (like in
54 and
56). Only silagermene
56 was crystallographically identified as featuring peculiar properties caused by the exceptional steric crowding of its
tBu
3Si-substituents: rather long [
rSi=Ge = 2.2769(8) Å] and markedly twisted [
τ = 24.7°] Si=Ge double bond with planar geometry at the sp
2-Si and sp
2-Ge atoms [
ΣSi =
ΣGe = 360°]. Upon thermolysis at 100 °C,
56 quantitatively isomerized to a symmetrically substituted silagermene (
E)-[
tBu
3Si(Mes)Si=Ge(Mes)Si
tBu
3]
[66].
Iwamoto, Kira, and coworkers reported identically substituted silagermene, (
tBuMe
2Si)
2Si=Ge(SiMe
2tBu)
2 57, prepared by the reductive debromination of 1,2-di(bromo)silagermane Br(
tBuMe
2Si)
2Si–Ge(SiMe
2tBu)
2Br with sodium in toluene
[12]. As with other stable silagermenes,
57 manifested a low-field resonance for its sp
2-Si center [
δ(
29Si) = 144.0 ppm], a short (compared to other silagermenes) [
rSi=Ge = 2.2208(4) Å] and almost undistorted [
τ = 7.5°] Si=Ge double bond, and practically planar geometry at the doubly bonded Si and Ge atoms [
θ = 0.6°].
The ”inorganic ethylene” donor–acceptor
push–pull complex, {[IPr:]→SiH
2–H
2Ge:→[W(CO)
5]}
58, in which the “SiH
2–H
2Ge” fragment is complexed with both Lewis base [IPr (IPr = 1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-2
H-imidazol-2-ylidene)] and Lewis acid [W(CO)
5], was reported by Rivard and coworkers
[67]. Moreover,
58 was synthesized by the reaction of the di(chloro)silylene complex [IPr∙SiCl
2]
[68] and [Cl
2Ge∙W(CO)
5], giving at first [IPr∙SiCl
2–Cl
2Ge∙W(CO)
5] a complex that was subsequently reduced with LiAlH
4 to form the final complex, {[IPr:]→SiH
2–H
2Ge:→[W(CO)
5]}
58. Given the strongly shielded Si nucleus [
δ(
29Si) = –71.9 ppm (triplet,
1JSi–H = 192.2 Hz)] and very long Si–Ge bond of 2.3717(14) Å, the central Si–Ge interaction in
58 is best classified as a single, rather than a double, bond. This was supported by the computations on the model compound (Me in place of the real 2,6-
iPr
2-C
6H
3 substituents on N atoms in IPr ligand; B3LYP/cc-pVDZ-pp), which yielded WBI
Si–Ge value of only 0.88, thus suggesting Si–Ge single-type bonding.
The latest example of the stable silagermenes was very recently reported by Scheschkewitz and coworkers. Their cyclic potassium silagermenide
59, representing a Si=Ge analogue of a vinyl anion, was synthesized by the reduction of a germylene–NHC complex with KC
8 (Scheme 28)
[69]. The spectroscopic and structural features of
59 conform well to those of other stable silagermenes: characteristically deshielded sp
2-Si center [
δ(
29Si) = 142.9 ppm (in C
6D
6) and 138.5 ppm (in thf-
d8)] and short Si=Ge bond [
rSi=Ge = 2.2590(3) Å]. Moreover, the GeSi
2C-ring in
59 is nearly planar, with a negligible folding of 1.9°. According to the crystallographic and UV-spectroscopic data, the
π-conjugative interaction between the endocyclic Si=Ge double bond and exocyclic C=N double bond in
59 is notable with the calculated value for the
πSi=Ge–
π*
C=N interaction energy of 23.6 kcal mol
−1. Silagermenide
59 can be functionalized at the anionic Ge with the appropriate electrophiles to form novel neutral Ge-substituted silagermenes
60a,
b (Scheme 28)
[69]. Similar to the starting silagermene
59, both (silyl)silagermene
60a [
E = SiPh
3] and (phosphanyl)silagermene
60b [
E = P(N
iPr
2)
2] showed low-field resonances for their sp
2-Si atoms [
δ(
29Si) = 136.6 ppm (singlet) and 104.5 ppm (doublet,
2JSi–P = 9.8 Hz), respectively], and short Si=Ge bonds [
rSi=Ge = 2.2020(2) and 2.2252(4) Å, respectively]. The GeSi
2C-ring in
60a is practically planar (folding angle = 0.2°), and the geometry around the Ge atom is slightly pyramidal (
ΣGe = 357.3°).
Scheme 28. Synthesis of anionic silagermenide 59 and neutral silagermenes 60a,b.
Silagermenes, in which the Si=Ge double bond is a part of the 1,3-diene (>Si=Ge–C=C<), allene (>Si=Ge=Si</>Ge=Si=Ge<), or vinylidene (>Si=Ge:) system, are discussed separately in Section 4.2.1, Section 5.1, and Section 6.2.1, respectively.
2.2.3. Germastannenes >Ge=Sn<
The first reported transient germastannene, [Mes
2Ge=SnTip
2], was generated via the dehydrofluorination of Mes
2(H)Ge–Sn(F)Tip
2 by
tBuLi by Escudié and coworkers
[70]. Decomposing at room temperature, this germastannene was proved to be as such on the basis of its low-field
119Sn NMR resonance [360.0 ppm, −20 °C] and trapping reactions with MeOH and PhCHO.
As for the stable germastannenes, four of them were reported in 2003/2004. The first three were synthesized by the research groups of Weidenbruch and Sekiguchi in 2003. Thus, Weidenbruch and coworkers prepared the first structurally authenticated germastannene, Tip
2Ge=SnTip
2 61, by a one-pot low temperature reaction of TipMgBr, GeCl
2•diox and SnCl
2 [71]. Expectedly, germastannene
61 revealed low-field resonance of its sp
2-Sn center [
δ(
119Sn) = 268.0 ppm], short Ge=Sn bond [
rGe=Sn = 2.5065(5) Å] that was substantially shorter than the typical Ge–Sn single bonds, and remarkable
trans-bending of the substituents [
θ = 30.2° (at Ge) and 43.3° (at Sn)]. Being stable in the solid form,
61 decomposed in solution via dissociation of the Ge=Sn double bond to give a cyclotristannane
cyclo-(Tip
2Sn)
3 and a digermene Tip
2Ge=GeTip
2.
Another stable germastannene, unsymmetrically substituted (
tBu
2MeSi)
2Ge=SnTip
2 62, was synthesized in 2003 by Sekiguchi and coworkers by the coupling of 1,1-di(lithio)germane (
tBu
2MeSi)
2GeLi
2 and di(aryl)di(chloro)stannane Tip
2SnCl
2 (Scheme 29)
[72]. In the absence of X-ray data,
62 was identified by its characteristic low-field tin resonance [
δ(
119Sn) = 525.1 ppm]. Upon thermolysis at 50 °C,
62 quantitatively isomerized to a symmetrically substituted germastannene, (
E)-[Tip(
tBu
2MeSi)Ge=Sn(SiMe
tBu
2)Tip]
63 (Scheme 29)
[72]. A concerted isomerization pathway involving simultaneous 1,2-migration of the silyl and aryl groups in the starting germastannene
62 was proposed, based on the negative value of the activation entropy (Δ
S‡ = –12.0 cal/K·mol). The doubly bonded Sn atom in isomeric
63 was more shielded than that in the starting
62, 373.4 ppm vs. 525.1 ppm, as a result of their different substitution patterns. The preliminary crystallographic data of
63 revealed the
trans-bending of substituents at the Ge=Sn bond with
θ angles of ca. 28.0°.
Scheme 29. Synthesis of the unsymmetrically substituted germastannene 62 and its thermal isomerization to the symmetrically substituted germastannene 63.
The only currently known cyclic germastannene,
3Δ-1,2,3,4-disilagermastannetene
64, featuring an endocyclic Ge=Sn double bond incorporated into the four-membered ring skeleton, was synthesized by Lee, Sekiguchi and coworkers in 2004
[73]. Moreover,
64 was readily available by the ring expansion of either 3
H- or 1
H-disilagermirenes
[39] with SnCl
2•diox (Scheme 30). As is typical for germastannenes, the doubly bonded Sn atom was diagnostically deshielded [
δ(
119Sn) = 439.3 ppm]. In a sharp contrast to the acyclic tetra(aryl)germastannenes Mes
2Ge=SnTip
2 [70] and Tip
2Ge=SnTip
2 61
[71], cyclic tetra(silyl)germastannene
64 was indefinitely stable both in the solid state and in solution, showing no signs of dissociation of its >Ge=Sn< double bond into the germylene >Ge: and stannylene >Sn:. The unexpected high thermal stability of
64 was assigned to the influence of its
σ-donating silyl substituents, further enhanced by the proposed
πGe=Sn→
σ*
Si–Cl orbital mixing lowering the
πGe=Sn-orbital energy level and thus stabilizing the HOMO of the molecule
[73].
Scheme 30. Synthesis of cyclic germastannene 64.
Since 2004, no stable germastannenes >Ge=Sn< were reported.
3. Heavy Analogues of Alkynes
3.1. Homonuclear Derivatives
Digermynes –Ge≡Ge–
The first digermyne Ar′–Ge≡Ge–Ar′ [Ar′ = 2,6-(2,6-
iPr
2-C
6H
3)
2-C
6H
3]
65 was synthesized and structurally characterized in 2002 by Power and coworkers via the reduction of the (chloro)germylene Ar′(Cl)Ge: with potassium
[74]. The C
Ar′–Ge–Ge–C
Ar′ core in digermyne
65 was planar and
trans-bent with the Ge–Ge–C
Ar′ bond angle of 128.7°. The Ge–Ge bond was rather short [
rGe≡Ge = 2.2850(6) Å], which is indicative of its considerable multiply bonded character. On the other hand, accumulation of the lone pair electron density at the Ge atoms results in the
trans-bending of their substituents, and consequently in the decrease (compared to the ideal triple bonding) of the Ge–Ge bond order and bond strength.
Following the report, Power’s group prepared a series of stable terphenyl-substituted digermynes, Ar*–Ge≡Ge–Ar* [Ar* = 2,6-(2,4,6-
iPr
3-C
6H
2)
2-C
6H
3]
66 [75][76], Ar″–Ge≡Ge–Ar″ [Ar″ = 4-Cl-{2,6-(2,6-
iPr
2-C
6H
3)
2}-C
6H
2]
67 [77], Ar‴–Ge≡Ge–Ar‴ [Ar‴ = 4-Me
3Si-{2,6-(2,6-
iPr
2-C
6H
3)
2}-C
6H
2]
68 [77], and Ar**–Ge≡Ge–Ar** [Ar** = 3,5-
iPr
2-{2,6-(2,4,6-
iPr
3-C
6H
2)
2}-C
6H]
69 [77], which were uniformly prepared by the reduction of the corresponding aryl(chloro)germylenes with K or KC
8. The digermyne
66 was characterized by NMR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, and its reaction with 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-butadiene
[75][76]. All structurally characterized digermynes
67–
69 displayed features similar to those of the first digermyne
65, namely planar [C
Ar–Ge–Ge–C
Ar torsional angles = 180° (for
67 and
68) and 165.8° (for
69)] and
trans-bent [
trans-bent Ge–Ge–C
Ar angles = 124.2° (for
67), 128.4° (for
68), and 136.1° (for very crowded
69)] C
Ar–Ge–Ge–C
Ar core arrays
[74][77]. The Ge–Ge bonds in digermynes
67–
69 were short [
rGe≡Ge = 2.3071(3) Å (for
67), 2.2438(8) Å (for
68), 2.2125(13) Å (for
69)], being comparable to those in digermenes >Ge=Ge<. The different Ge–Ge bond lengths in digermynes
65 and
67–
69 can be understood in terms of the substituents’ electronic effects. Thus, digermynes
68 and
69 with the shortest Ge–Ge bonds feature electron donating alkyl or silyl substituents on the central aryl rings, whereas digermyne
65 (which has no such electron donating groups) and digermyne
67 (with electron withdrawing Cl substituents) have notably longer Ge–Ge bonds. Given that the electron donating groups typically reduce the extent of the
trans-bending, whereas electron withdrawing groups having the opposite effect, it is reasonable that a smaller bending leads to a higher bond order and a shorter Ge–Ge bond, and vice versa.
Jones and coworkers reported bis(amido)digermyne R–Ge≡Ge–R {R = N(Si
iPr
3)[2,6-(CHPh
2)
2-4-
iPr-C
6H
2]}
70 prepared by the reduction of the germylene R(Cl)Ge: with [(
MesNacnac)Mg]
2 [18]. However, given the Ge–Ge bond distance of 2.3568(3) Å in
70 that is markedly longer than those of Power’s di(aryl)digermynes
[74][77], it is better formulated as a digermene (WBI = 1.75)
[18], rather than a digermyne.
By contrast, the constitution of the stable di(aryl)digermyne Bbt–Ge≡Ge–Bbt (Bbt = 2,6-[(Me
3Si)
2CH]
2-4-[(Me
3Si)
3C]-C
6H
2)
71, as the triply bonded derivative, was firmly established by Tokitoh and coworkers
[78].
71 was readily prepared by the reduction of the 1,2-di(bromo)digermene precursor
trans-[Bbt(Br)Ge=Ge(Bbt)Br] with KC
8. The two crystallographically independent molecules in the unit cell of
71 showed slightly twisted [C
Ar–Ge–Ge–C
Ar torsional angles = 160.2° and 168.9°] and very short [
rGe≡Ge = 2.2060(7) Å and 2.2260(7) Å] Ge–Ge bonds (markedly shorter that those in Power’s digermynes
65 and
67–69).
Reducing 1,2-di(bromo)digermene (
E)-Tbb(Br)Ge=Ge(Br)Tbb (Tbb = 2,6-[(Me
3Si)
2CH]
2-4-
tBu-C
6H
2) with KC
8, Sasamori, Tokitoh and coworkers synthesized novel di(aryl)digermyne Tbb–Ge≡Ge–Tbb
72 [9]. As other digermynes,
72 displayed short Ge≡Ge bond [
rGe≡Ge = 2.2410(9)/2.2221(9) Å] and
trans-bent C
aryl–Ge–Ge angle (130.5/130.7°) (for two independent molecules in the unit cell of
72).
3.2. Heteronuclear Derivatives
Germynes –Ge≡C–
Heteronuclear alkyne analogues of the type –Ge≡E– (E = C, Si, Sn, Pb), featuring a triple bond between germanium and different group 14 element, were always among the top challenges for experimental pursuits. However, despite numerous research efforts, such compounds (as stable derivatives) have not been isolated to date, although germynes R–Ge≡C–R′ were most closely approached, both computationally and experimentally.
Theoretical studies by Su and a coworker predicted that the germynes can be synthetically accessible, if appropriately substituted with bulky groups to prevent isomerization and oligomerization of highly reactive germynes
[79].
The first chemical evidence for the transient germyne ArGe≡CSiMe
3 [Ar = 2,6-(
iPr
2NCH
2)
2-C
6H
3], generated by the low-temperature photolysis (
λ = 300 nm, −50 C°) of (diazo)germylene precursor ArGe[C(N
2)SiMe
3] and trapped with
tBuOH forming ArGe(O
tBu)
2CH
2SiMe
3, was reported by Couret and coworkers
[80]. The transient germyne ArGe≡CSiMe
3 [Ar = 2,4-
tBu-6-(
iPr
2NCH
2)-C
6H
2] was similarly generated and trapped with water and
tBuOH by Mazières and coworkers
[81].
Likewise, photolyzing stable (diazo)germylene, the Kato and Baceiredo group generated metastable (stable below −30 °C) phosphine-stabilized germyne
[82]. This compound, however, featured a very long Ge–C separation, [
rGe–C = 1.887(5) Å], a value that was intermediate between those of typical Ge–Ge single and Ge=Ge double bonds. Accordingly, it is better described as a singly bonded bis(carbenoid) [:Ge–C:] rather than a triply bonded germyne [Ge≡C].
4. Heavy Analogues of 1,3-Dienes
4.1. Homonuclear Derivatives
Tetra(germa)buta-1,3-dienes >Ge=Ge–Ge=Ge<
The very first compound of this type, Tip
2Ge=Ge(Tip)–Ge(Tip)=GeTip
2 (Tip = 2,4,6-
iPr
3-C
6H
2)
73, was synthesized in 2000 by Weidenbruch and coworkers via the reduction of the digermene Tip
2Ge=GeTip
2 with lithium, followed by the reaction of the resulting digermenyllithium [Tip
2Ge=Ge(Tip)Li] with TipBr (Scheme 31)
[44]. The Ge–Ge bonds in
73 are in accord with the formulation of the 1,3-diene system >Ge1=Ge2–Ge3=Ge4<, being 2.3568(6) Å (for Ge1=Ge2), 2.4581(5) Å (for Ge2–Ge3), and 2.3439(5) Å (for Ge3=Ge4), respectively. Both Ge=Ge bonds in
73 are
trans-bent [
θ = 35.4°/31.1° (for Ge1=Ge2) and 33.3°/31.1° (for Ge3=Ge4)] and twisted [
τ = 22.4° (Ge1=Ge2) and 21.3° (for Ge3=Ge4)], as is typical for the digermenes. The longest wavelength absorption of
73 in hexane is 560 nm, which remarkably exceeded those of yellow or orange digermenes by 140 nm [and even those of tetra(silyl)digermenes by ca. 100 nm], thus testifying to the presence of conjugation between the two Ge=Ge double bonds.
Scheme 31. Synthesis of the first isolable tetragermabuta-1,3-diene 73.
The same authors later reported improved synthesis of
73 by the one-pot reaction of GeCl
2∙dioxane complex, TipMgBr, and Mg in THF, allowing for an increase of the isolated yield of
73 to 31% (cf.: 11%
[40])
[47]. In
o-dichlorobenzene, tetra(germa)buta-1,3-diene
73 revealed a reversible reduction [
E1/2(red) = –0.46 V] and irreversible oxidation [
Ep(ox) = 0.15 V], whereas in THF both reduction and oxidation processes were irreversible [
Ep(red) = –1.75/–1.3 V and
Ep(ox) = 0.6 V]
[83].
Apart from
73, there is only one tetra(germa)butadiene derivative reported by Matsuo and coworkers, tetra(germa)cyclobutadiene Ge
4[EMind]
4 (EMind = 1,1,7,7-tetraethyl-3,3,5,5-tetramethyl-
s-hydrindacen-4-yl)
74 (as the germanium analogue of the isostructural tetra(sila)cyclobutadiene
[84])
[85]. Moreover,
74 was available by the reduction of di(chloro)digermene [EMind](Cl)Ge=Ge(Cl)[EMind] with lithium naphthalenide (Scheme 32). In contrast to tetra(sila)cyclobutadiene, tetra(germa)cyclobutadiene
74 was thermally stable, with the UV-absorptions observed at 458 (ε = 15000), 510 (ε = 7400), and 836 nm (ε = 150). The Ge
4-ring is rhombic-planar [
Σinternal bond angles = 360°] with the cyclic Ge–Ge bonds of 2.430 Å (av.). Two germanium atoms feature sp
2-like trigonal-planar geometry (
ΣGe = 360.0°), whereas the other two germanium atoms have sp
3-like pyramidal configuration (
ΣGe = 334.0 and 327.7°) with the
trans-bending of substituents (
θ = 37.9 and 40.6°). Theoretical studies revealed that the Ge–Ge bond orders in
74 = 1.08–1.09 (WBI). Within the Ge
4-ring, there is a clear charge separation: if the two diagonal Ge atoms are slightly positively charged (+0.146 and +0.151, NPA charges), the other two Ge atoms are strongly positively charged (+0.602 and +0.573, NPA charges). All of these data are indicative of the crucial contribution of the charge-separated resonance form
cyclo-[Ge
+–Ge
−–Ge
+–Ge
−], which was also the case for the previously reported tetra(sila)cyclobutadiene. The polar Jahn–Teller distortion results in the relaxation of the inherent 4
π-antiaromaticity of
74, thus forming a charge-separated rhombic–planar singlet structure, which is nonaromatic (based on the NICS values).
Scheme 32. Synthesis of tetra(germa)cyclobutadiene 74.
4.2. Heteronuclear Derivatives
4.2.1. 1-Sila-2-germabuta-1,3-dienes >Si=Ge–C=C<
Lee, Sekiguchi, and coworkers developed a different approach toward 1,3-dienes containing Ge atoms. They synthesized five-membered ring derivatives including the >Si=Ge–C=C< 1,3-diene fragment, starting from the [2 + 2] cycloaddition of the heavy cyclopropene (1
H-disilagermirene
50 [39]) with terminal alkynes to yield bicyclo[2.1.0]pentenes
75, which underwent valence isomerization, finally forming 1,2-disila-3-germacyclopenta-2,4-dienes
76 [
29Si NMR (sp
2-Si): +124.2 ppm (
76a), +123.6 ppm (
76b), and +127.3 ppm (
76c)] (Scheme 33)
[86][87][88]. Such heavy cyclopentadienes
76 constitute rather unusual cyclic systems with two formally conjugated double bonds, Si=Ge and C=C, which are actually isolated, despite the planarity of the five-membered ring. This conclusion was based on the crystallographic and UV spectroscopic data. Thus, in the Si=Ge–C=C fragment, all bonds are within the standard ranges (for example, for
76a, 2.250(1) Å (Si=Ge), 1.972(3) Å (Ge–C), and 1.343(5) Å (C=C)); that is, no elongation of the double bonds and shortening of the single bonds expected for the conjugated system were observed. Likewise, there was no notable red-shift in the longest wavelength UV absorption (
π–
π*) of
76a compared to that of the starting
50 with isolated Si=Ge bond, 472 vs. 467 nm, respectively. Most likely, the lack of 1,3-conjugation between the Si=Ge and C=C bonds in 1,2-disila-3-germacyclopenta-2,4-dienes
76 results from the substantial spatial and energetic mismatch of the Si=Ge and C=C bonds molecular orbitals, because effective overlap of the latter is a prerequisite for the
π-electrons delocalization.
Scheme 33. Synthesis of 1,2-disila-3-germacyclopenta-2,4-dienes 76a–c containing Si=Ge–C=C system.
4.2.2. 1,2-di(germa)cyclobuta-1,3-diene >Ge=Ge–C=C<
This synthetic strategy toward Ge=Ge–C=C conjugated systems was pioneered by Power’s group and then developed by Sasamori and coworkers, who prepared and isolated stable 1,2-di(germa)cyclobutadienes
77a,
b via the reaction of their respective digermynes with diphenylacetylene (Scheme 34)
[89][90][91]. In both
77a and
77b, the Ge
2C
2-ring is practically planar (
Σinternal bond angles = 359.8° (
77a)
[89] and 359.9° (
77b)
[91]), albeit the Ge centers are strongly pyramidalized [
ΣGe = 318.8° and 317.3° (
77a [89])]. Within the Ge=Ge–C=C fragment, the bonds germanium–germanium/germanium–carbon/carbon–carbon are classified as double/single/double bonds, respectively: 2.4708(9)/[2.022(5) and 2.027(5)]/1.365(7) Å (
77a)
[89], and 2.4160(5)/2.022(2)/1.362(5) Å (
77b)
[91]. Accordingly, the structure of
77a,b is best described by the resonance form
cyclo-[Ge=Ge–C=C] with the weak Ge=Ge double bond, as depicted in Scheme 34.
Scheme 34. Synthesis of stable 1,2-di(germa)cyclobutadienes 77a,b.
By reacting 1,2-di(germa)cyclobutadiene
77b [91] with (Me
2N)
3P=Se, Sasamori and coworkers synthesized 2,5-di(germa)selenophene
78, formed through the transient “housene”-type bicyclic selenadigermirane with its subsequent isomerization to
78 (Scheme 35)
[92]. The selenium nucleus in
78 resonated in the low-field region at 481.8 ppm (
77Se NMR). On the basis of its structural data [
rGe–C = 1.921(3)/1.922(3) Å,
rC–C = 1.375(4) Å,
θGe = 7.8°(
trans), nonplanar SeGe
2C
2-ring] and computational studies,
78 is better formulated as a singlet (digerma)biradicaloid
78B, while classical Lewis representation
78A is a minor contributor (Scheme 35). Nevertheless,
78 exhibited some degree of aromaticity, as its NICS(1) of –8.0 was comparable with that of the organic selenophene.
Scheme 35. Synthesis of 2,5-di(germa)selenophene 78.
5. Heavy Analogues of Allene
5.1. Tri(germa)allene >Ge=Ge=Ge<, Germadi(sila)allene >Si=Ge=Si<, and Di(germa)silaallene >Ge=Si=Ge<
Following their original report on the synthesis of the stable tri(sila)allene >Si=Si=Si<
[93], Kira and coworkers subsequently prepared tri(germa)allene
79a [94], 1,3-di(germa)silaallene
79b [94], and 2-germadi(sila)allene
79c [95]. Of them,
79a and
79b were prepared by the co-reduction of tetra(chloro)digermane
80a and chloro(trichlorosilyl)germane
80b with KC
8, whereas
79c was synthesized by the co-reduction of di(alkyl)silylene
81 and GeCl
2∙diox with KC
8 (Scheme 36). All sp
2-Si atoms were diagnostically deshielded, with the central Si atom in
79b being more strongly deshielded than the peripheral Si atoms in
79c: +236.6 ppm vs. +219.4 ppm. The longest wavelength UV absorptions in
79a,
79b, and
79c were found at 630, 612, and 599 nm, respectively, thus pointing to the significant conjugation between the cumulated double bonds. The allenic bonds in
79 were all in the range of the typical double bonds:
rGe=Ge = 2.321(2) Å and 2.330(3) Å in
79a,
rGe=Si = 2.2697(8) Å in
79b, and
rSi=Ge = 2.2366(7) Å and 2.2373(7) Å in
79c. The allenic E=E′=E framework in
79 was notably bent [bending angle = 122.61(6)° (in
79a), 125.71(7)° (in
79b), and 132.38(2)° (in
79c)], and the terminal atoms E were strongly pyramidalized [
θE = 348.5°/348.6° (in
79a), 349.3° (in
79b), and 353.9°/354.0° (in
79c)].
Scheme 36. Synthesis of tri(germa)allene 79a, 1,3-di(germa)silaallene 79b, and 2-germadi(sila)allene 79c.
Apart from Kira’s heavy allenes described above, there was only one recent report on the title compounds: Sasamori, Tokitoh, and coworkers prepared cyclic 1,3-di(germa)-2-silaallene
82 via the reductive dechlorination of tetra(chloro)-2,5-digerma-1-silacyclopentane with KC
8 (Scheme 37)
[96]. In
82, the SiGe
2C
2-ring is planar, and the germanium–silicon bonds are typical double bonds [
rSi=Ge = 2.2681(18) and 2.2900(18) Å]. However, the central allenic Si in
82 was extraordinarily shielded [
δ(
29Si) = –16.5 ppm]
[96] compared to that of Kira’s 1,3-di(germa)-2-silallene (236.6 ppm)
[94]. This was explained by the contribution of the “silylone” resonance structure [>Ge:→Si
0←:Ge<] of
82, resulting from the acute Ge–Si–Ge bond angle (80.1°) due to incorporation of the Ge–Si–Ge unit into the five-membered ring skeleton. This was supported by calculations which showed that the germanium–silicon bonds in
82 are highly polarized as Ge
δ+–Si
δ−, –0.27 for Si and +0.90/+0.91 for Ge (NPA charges), and this is indicative of an important Ge-to-Si
σ-donation.
Scheme 37. Synthesis of cyclic 1,3-di(germa)-2-silaallene 82.
5.2. Germaallenes >Ge=C=C<
Only a couple of isolable 1-germaallenes >Ge=C=C< are currently known. The first one, Tip
2Ge=C=C(
tBu)Ph
83, was reported by West and coworkers synthesized by the reaction of Tip
2Ge(F)–C≡C–Ph with
tBuLi via the transient [Tip
2Ge(F)–C(Li)=C(
tBu)Ph], which eliminated LiF to finally yield
5 [97]. In solution,
83 decomposed at room temperature within 15 h. In
83, as in other heteroallenes, the Ge=C and C=C bonds were short [
rGe=C = 1.783(2) Å and
rC=C = 1.314(2) Å], the Ge=C=C fragment was bent (159.2°), the geometry at the Ge atom was pyramidal (
ΣGe = 348.4°), and the central C atom was greatly deshielded [
δ(
13C) = +235.1 ppm].
The second 1-germaallene, Tbt(Mes)Ge=C=CR
2 (CR
2 = fluorenylidene)
84, was prepared by the reductive dechlorination of Tbt(Mes)ClGe–C(Cl)=CR
2 with
tBuLi
[98]. Like in
83, the central allenic carbon of
84 resonated in the diagnostic low-field at +243.6 ppm. Without trapping reagents,
84 underwent slow intramolecular cyclization via C–H activation of one of the (Me
3Si)
2CH groups by the Ge=C bond to form a benzogermacyclobutene derivative.
6. Heavy Analogues of Vinylidenes
Vinylidenes R2C=C:, with substituent-free terminal carbon atoms, are the valence isomers of alkynes RC≡CR. They are exceptionally reactive, and for their stabilization, external bases, such as NHC, are particularly effective. Accordingly, all—except for Aldridge’s di(germa)vinylidene (vide infra)—isolable heavy group 14 analogues of vinylidenes R2E=E′: (E, E′ = heavy group 14 elements) were stabilized by NHC-coordination.
6.1. Homonuclear Derivatives
Di(germa)vinylidene >Ge=Ge:
The first di(germa)vinylidene
85, synthesized by Aldridge and coworkers, was free from external NHC-coordination, in contrast to the NHC-supported silagermenylidenes (vide infra) (Scheme 38)
[99].
Scheme 38. Synthesis of the first digermavinylidene 85.
85 was prepared by the reduction of the boryl(chloro)germylene–NHC complex with K (or KC8), followed by the oxidation of the intermediate dianion by [Ph3C]+[B(C6F5)4]− (Scheme 38). The germanium–germanium bond in 85 is planar and short [rGe=Ge = 2.312(1) Å] in order to formulate it as a Ge=Ge double bond. In the crystal, weakly stabilizing interactions were found between one of the aryl π-systems of each of the boryl substituents and the vacant p-orbital at the monocoordinated Ge atom. The HOMO of 85 is the Ge=Ge π-bond, whereas the HOMO–1 is mostly the naked Ge lone pair. The longest wavelength UV-absorption in 85, observed at 460 nm, is due to the Ge=Ge bond π–π* electronic transition.
Another stable di(germa)vinylidene
86 was reported by Wesemann and coworkers, synthesized by the reduction of intramolecularly phosphine-stabilized chloro(germyl)germylene with [(
MesNacnac)Mg]
2 (
MesNacnac = {[(2,4,6-Me
3-C
6H
2)N–(Me)C]
2CH}
−) or metallic sodium (Scheme 39)
[100]. The germanium–germanium bond in
86 [
rGe=Ge = 2.3060(2) Å] is within the range of the Ge=Ge double bonds, but it is slightly shorter than that in
85 [
rGe=Ge = 2.312(1) Å]; the bicyclic framework is planar, and the tricoordinate sp
2-Ge disclosed nearly planar geometry (
ΣGe = 358.8°). As the manifestation of the Ge=Ge double bonding in
86,
πGe=Ge and
π*
Ge=Ge orbitals represent the HOMO and LUMO, respectively. The bonding situation in
86 can be alternatively viewed as a double Lewis base-stabilized Ge atom in the formal oxidation state 0. Thus, di(germa)vinylidene
86 can potentially serve as a source for Ge
0-single atom transfer by the germanium abstraction reactions.
Scheme 39. Synthesis of digermavinylidene 86.
6.2. Heteronuclear Derivatives
6.2.1. Silagermenylidene >Si=Ge:
The first isolable heavy Group 14 elements analogue of the vinylidene, NHC-stabilized silagermenylidene Tip
2Si=Ge:(⟵NHC) (NHC = 1,3-diisopropyl-4,5-dimethylimidazol-2-ylidene)
87, was prepared by the co-reduction of Tip
2SiCl
2 and [NHC→GeCl
2] complex with lithium naphthalenide, as reported by Scheschkewitz and coworkers
[101]. As is typical for the Si=Ge doubly bonded system, the Si atom in
87 is markedly deshielded [
δ(
29Si) = 158.9 ppm] and has a planar configuration (
ΣSi = 359.8°), and the Si=Ge bond is short [
rSi=Ge = 2.2521(5) Å]. Moreover, the Si=Ge bond in
87 is practically untwisted (
τ = 3.1°), which favors an effective
pπ–
pπ orbital overlap, and the NHC-ligand coordinates to the Ge nearly orthogonally (C
NHC–Ge–Si bond angle = 98.9°), thus maximizing the [
nNHC lone pair →
pGe] orbital interaction. Subsequently, the same group prepared another NHC-stabilized silagermenylidene, [Tip
2(Cl)Si](Tip)Si=Ge:(⟵NHC) (NHC = 1,3-diisopropyl-4,5-dimethylimidazol-2-ylidene)
88, whose spectral and structural characteristics are similar to those of
87:
δ (
29Si) = 162.5 ppm,
rSi=Ge = 2.2757(10) Å, C
NHC–Ge–Si bond angle = 101.9°
[102].