Modeling of Neurodegenerative Diseases

Version	Summary	Created by	Modification	Content Size	Created at	Operation
1		Irina Alieva	--	6816	2023-01-17 11:26:00	\|
2	format	Jason Zhu	-5 word(s)	6811	2023-01-18 02:50:52	\|

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/ijms24010604

Neurodegenerative diseases have acquired the status of one of the leading causes of death in developed countries, which requires creating new model systems capable of accurately reproducing the mechanisms underlying these pathologies. Each model has unique properties that make it the optimal tool for modeling certain aspects of neurodegenerative disorders. It is necessary to combine models into complexes that include organisms and artificial systems of different organizational levels. Such complexes can be organized in two ways. The first method can be described as “step by step”, where each model for studying a certain characteristic is a separate step that allows using the information obtained in the modeling process for the gradual study of increasingly complex processes in subsequent models. The second way is a ‘network’ approach. Studies are carried out with several types of models simultaneously, and experiments with each specific type are adjusted in conformity with the data obtained from other models.

neurodegenerative diseases model organisms disease modeling

1. Basic Requirements for Models of Neurodegenerative Disorders

One way to learn about how a disease works to destroy the normal functions of an organism is to develop a model system that recapitulates the hallmark characteristics of the disease.

The main requirement for a neurodegenerative disease model is the ability to reproduce characteristic pathological processes resulting from specific molecular and cellular disorders. The importance of this requirement is due to the fact that most modern methods of treatment do not address the basic mechanisms of neurodegenerative diseases, but only relieve symptoms ^[1]^[2]. In addition to reproducing the basic mechanisms, the model must also undergo appropriate functional and morphological changes at the cellular, tissue and organism levels.

1.1. Variability and Phenotypic Plasticity

Numerous studies have shown that neurodegenerative diseases can have a variety of mechanisms of occurrence ^[3]^[4]^[5]^[6]. The same symptoms may be due to different causes. Conversely, the same factor under certain conditions can cause several neurodegenerative diseases with different symptoms ^[3]^[7]^[8]. The development of a particular symptom, or the disease as a whole, is due to the interaction of many factors, both internal and external. Even if the body has disorders on the molecular or cellular level that can lead to the development of a neurodegenerative disorder, they may not manifest themselves if the body is in favorable conditions ^[9]. Conversely, unfavorable conditions lead to the manifestation of disorders, the occurrence of which was previously successfully suppressed by the body ^[7]. The key property of neurodegenerative disease models should be the ability to change under the influence of negative environmental factors, as well as to change the course of normal life processes in general. Only in this way will the models fully simulate neurodegenerative processes.

1.2. Biochemical Correspondence of the Model to the Organism under Study

As has already been mentioned, to obtain the most accurate results, a model of a neurodegenerative disease should approximate the ‘original’ organism from the point of view of metabolic disorders as well. The model should not only reproduce the symptoms of the disease but also copy the pathological process at the molecular level and the signaling cascade (or proteinopathy) that is disturbed in a specific disease. It has been proved that models of hereditary forms of neurodegenerative diseases, even in the case of incomplete compliance with phenocopic changes occurring under the influence of unfavorable environmental factors, make it possible to fully reproduce the molecular mechanisms underlying the disease ^[10]. This approach allowed the rejection of ineffective and dangerous methods of treatment ^[11]. For the most complete conformity to the human body, a number of pathological processes corresponding to the disease should occur in the animal model at many levels: from molecular-genetic to the general organism, including biochemical processes and metabolism. Special attention in the models should be paid to the problems of general aging of the body and the consistent development of symptoms caused by the gradual accumulation of mutant or damaged proteins. The model should assume the gradual development of the symptoms of the corresponding disease since this is critical in terms of studying the development of the disease and potential treatment. Mutations in model organisms should not cause a rapid disruption of nervous activity or a general disruption of metabolic processes. The model should respond selectively to genome disturbances and the spread of damaged proteins throughout the body, accurately copying the symptoms of the ‘original’ disease.

1.3. The Rate of Reproduction and Model Response to Impact

The approach to the treatment of any neurodegenerative disease involves three stages: diagnosis, actual treatment and further evaluation of its effectiveness. Each of these stages is important and can become an object of modeling. The time frame is no less important since the development of neurodegenerative pathologies can last for years and even decades. Thus, the development of Alzheimer’s disease takes an average of three years and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease—within nine to ten years ^[12]^[13]. The disease may have a very long incubation period or be the result of many years of exposure to negative environmental factors such as heavy metal pollution ^[7]. Models of neurodegenerative diseases should, as far as possible, reproduce the corresponding time intervals between key events accompanying the development of neuropathology, without sacrificing the quality and accuracy of modeling. In addition, for animal models (especially those that replicate pathologies caused by inherited genetic defects) the rate of reproduction, generational change, and the lifespan of an individual is of importance.

1.4. Functional Correspondence of the Model to the Organism under Study

This requirement applies to animal models of neurodegenerative diseases, more precisely, to models based on vertebrates, since only they have a sufficiently developed nervous system and complex types of behavior comparable to the higher nervous activity of man.

The described complex types of behavior are associated with the fact that the nervous system is never in a stable state, as it is constantly rebuilt and modified. The formation of reflex arcs and the memorization of information and learning require the restructuring of neural connections, the decay of old ones and the formation of new ones. Moreover, the nervous system is rebuilt in the process of body growth and maturation. One should not forget that the nervous system is not protected from damage, and inflammation and regeneration processes take place in it. The processes of neuroplasticity are especially strongly activated after craniocerebral injuries and stroke. In general, neuroplasticity processes can be divided into two types: regeneration (the formation of new cells or new synaptic contacts) and functional restructuring (occurs without changing the number of cells) ^[14]. These processes should also be taken into account by researchers when creating model systems.

2. Prokaryotic Models

2.1. General Characteristics of Prokaryotic Models

Prokaryotic organisms are routinely used in modern biology and biotechnology to produce substances with set properties (mainly proteins), including mutant proteins characteristic of certain neuropathology (act as protein factories). Thus, researchers have the opportunity to study the proteins involved in neurodegeneration without using human material to identify their structure, aggregation mechanisms, etc.

Today prokaryotes are increasingly used to create models of the ‘microbiome-brain-gut’ system in neurodegeneration studies ^[15]. These models are not pure prokaryotic, since the model includes a vertebrate as a host. It is shown that malfunction of the blood-brain barrier ^[16] can lead to the entry of bacterial amyloids into the bloodstream, into the brain and further prion-like dissemination of the abnormal protein structure in the nervous tissue. In addition, the process can begin with enteroendocrine and M-cells in the intestinal epithelium and be transmitted to the brain through the autonomic nervous system via a bidirectional pathway ^[17]. Conversely, pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) can lead to the overactivation of the immune system, autoimmune reactions, and inflammation in the nervous system ^[17]^[18]^[19]^[20]. The interest of neuroscientists in the models of the “microbiome-brain-intestine” system is growing every day since the technologies for creating bacterial factories producing mutant proteins are well developed and are easy enough to introduce into the host body.

2.2. The Role of the Intestine’s Microflora in the Development of Neurodegenerative Diseases: The ‘Microbiome-Brain-Gut’ Axis

The gut microbiome, together with the immune, endocrine and all three sections of the autonomic nervous system (parasympathetic, sympathetic and enteric) forms a complex that allows bacteria to influence the central nervous system ^[15]. The metabolic products of bacteria interact directly with the central nervous system. As a result, the development and functioning of the brain in both normal and pathological conditions is largely determined by the mutual transmission of signals between the brain and the intestine ^[21].

Several in vitro microbiome systems have been described, among which three main types can be distinguished:

SHIME—The Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem. The system is a complex consisting of bioreactors connected in series with peristaltic pumps. In each bioreactor conditions specific to a particular section of the digestive system are created (an anaerobic environment and optimal temperature are maintained in all bioreactors). The reactors correspond to the following sections of the gastrointestinal tract: stomach, small intestine, ascending colon, transverse colon, and descending colon ^[22];
SIMGI—SIMulator of GastroIntestinal tract. This system is similar to SHIME in many ways, but there are some differences. This model is not only fully automated but also controlled by a computer. Moreover, the gastric compartment has a peristaltic mixing system ^[21];
Organ-On-A-Chip Systems. These include microfluidic systems, which are ultra-compact (within fractions of a millimeter) bioreactors containing organotypic cell cultures capable of reproducing the pathophysiological processes in miniature. In the case of modeling the ‘microbiome-brain-gut’ axis, the role of these systems is to reproduce the processes of the transfer of bacterial neurotoxins through various microanatomical barriers, including the blood-brain barrier ^[23];

2.3. Transgenic Bacterial Models

The main sphere of application of transgenic bacterial models of neurodegenerative diseases is the synthesis of pathological proteins and the subsequent study of how they fold, interact and aggregate dynamically ^[24].

E. coli, being one of the most thoroughly studied prokaryotic organisms, turned out to be not the most convenient model organism for use as a ‘protein factory’. The reasons are the need for the constant application of antibiotics to maintain the culture, low transformation efficiency associated with the loss of plasmids, as well as problems at the stage of formation of the final product such as the violation of the formation of secondary and tertiary structures, protein aggregation and the absence of the necessary post-translational modifications. Therefore, the search for optimal cell factories should be carried out among bacterial species adapted to more diverse and extreme conditions ^[24].

Prions are a key factor that brings together a variety of disorders of the nervous system, from Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. They are a group of a wide variety of protein molecules that have an abnormal tertiary structure that can transfer their structure to homologous proteins, as well as form insoluble aggregates that gradually accumulate and are the main cause of the detrimental effect of prions on the nervous system ^[25]. Such a sequential process of accumulation causes a long duration of neurodegenerative process development.

Bacterial cells can be used as ‘protein factories’ that synthesize prions specific to humans or other mammalian organisms. For instance, a recombinant mouse prion protein (recMoPrP) produced in transgenic E. coli has been used to study polymerization and amyloid fibril formation. Further, fibrils consisting of recMoPrP (89–230) were administered intracerebral to experimental mice. The mice developed neurological dysfunction on the 380th to 660th day after the administration ^[26].

3. Yeast Models

3.1. The Role of Yeast Models in the Study of Neurodegenerative Diseases

The value of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model organism lies in the fact that many of the biochemical and signaling pathways present in the human cell are highly conserved and perform similar functions in yeast cells. Evolutionary conservatism underlies the main method of working with yeast models. After a gene is found in the human genome that can be associated with a particular pathology, a line of yeast is created, in the genome of which there are mutations in a homologous sequence. If the homologous gene is absent in S. cerevisiae, then the corresponding defective gene is introduced into the genome of the model. In both cases, if the defective gene is responsible for the development of pathologies (in particular, neurodegenerative disorders), then the corresponding phenotype develops in yeast cells ^[27].

Yeast models, due to their simplicity, are not suitable for reproducing the complex symptoms of neuropathology such as behavioral disorders or changes in the structure of brain tissue. Therefore, the main symptoms modeled in yeast are the accumulation of abnormal proteins, as well as the disruption of the normal course of cell death and autophagy.

The functioning of all intracellular mechanisms aimed at combating proteins with an abnormal tertiary structure is ensured by the functioning of the chaperone and ubiquitin-proteasome systems of the cell ^[28]. Thus, yeast models serve primarily to study the mechanisms of neurodegenerative-associated protein accumulation and the functioning of the protein degradation systems (chaperones, proteasomes and autophagy).

3.2. Modeling of Disorders in Chaperone Functioning

Molecular chaperones can be called the first line of defense against neurodegenerative diseases. They eliminate misfolded proteins, preventing their aggregation and the formation of amyloid structures ^[28]^[29]^[30]. Although the information necessary for peptide folding and formation of the correct tertiary structure is contained in the amino acid sequence, the probability of misfolding is quite high since there are many other molecules and molecular complexes inside the cell that can affect the correct folding. In addition to that, the protein may be initially predisposed to misfolding due to the presence of mutations that lead to errors in the amino acid sequence of the polypeptide chain, which causes the occurrence of hereditary forms of neurodegenerative disorders ^[31]^[32]^[33]. To protect against such errors during evolution, a specific chaperone system arose, aimed at combating misfolded proteins in all parts of the cell ^[27]. Normally, chaperones assist in the formation of functional tertiary structures of peptide chains after their synthesis on ribosomes. In addition, chaperones support the translocation of proteins through membranes of the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria. The role of chaperones in protein degradation consists of directing ubiquitinated proteins both from the endoplasmic reticulum and cytoplasm into proteasome-mediated degradation and mediating lysosomal degradation. Besides that, chaperones play key roles in system cellular processes, such as regulation of transcription factors during the heat stress response, clathrin coating dismantling, and the fusion of vesicles with cell membranes in exocytosis, and apoptosis. One of the main dangers associated with abnormal proteins is their ability to spread, affecting healthy proteins and changing their structure. In other words, they behave like typical prions. The studies carried out on yeast have not only helped to understand the nature of the prion distribution as such, but also the role of chaperones in their distribution. Although chaperones are supposed to rid the cell of misfolded proteins in the case of β-amyloid, they, on the contrary, contribute to their distribution. Experiments on yeast models have shown that chaperones fragment growing β-amyloid fibrils, which leads to an increase in the number of fibril growth centers and their further distribution ^[34].

3.3. The role of Proteasomes and Their Interaction with Abnormal Proteins

Proteasomes cleave misfolded and mutated proteins into short peptide fragments. The active 26S proteasome is formed from a 20S subunit (core) and several 19S (regulatory) subunits. Experiments with yeast models have shown that the 20S subunit is inhibited by three-dimensional structures resulting from the oligomerization of proteins that are specific for neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s (β-amyloid), Parkinson’s (α-synuclein) and Huntington’s disease (HTT protein) ^[35].

3.4. Autophagy

Autophagy is an intracellular process necessary to maintain cell homeostasis. During autophagy, unnecessary and damaged cellular organelles and proteins are utilized. Autophagy is a critical process in a multicellular organism during embryogenesis, and in aging, and also plays a role in the development of diseases, including heart failure ^[36], myopathies ^[37] and neurodegenerative diseases ^[38]. Autophagy is also present in unicellular organisms, where it primarily serves as a reserve source of nutrients in the case of stress. Moreover, the main mechanism of autophagy was initially identified in yeast. A typical object of study of autophagic processes in a unicellular organism is S. cerevisiae ^[39]. Yeast models have been used to elucidate the exact molecular mechanisms of autophagy and key players in the signaling cascades associated with it, such as the Atg family of proteins. Autophagic mechanisms are highly conserved (including autophagic pathways involving TOR and PKA) and have been found to be present in both yeast and humans, with great similarity ^[40]. Studies on mammalian cells have shown the effect of hormonal regulation, energy status and nutrient levels on autophagy. In addition, environmental stress factors such as hypoxia, heat stress and the accumulation of reactive oxygen species are important (discussed in ^[41]).

Autophagy in yeast is known in sufficient detail at the molecular level. In addition, the autophagic process in S. cerevisiae proceeds synchronously in a homogeneous culture and depends on the amount of nutrients in the medium, which makes it easy to control it in experiments ^[42]. Thanks to all of the above and the abundance of developed methodological approaches, yeast is a convenient model for studying autophagy. However, the autophagy impact on the multicellular organism development and functioning, especially the nervous system, cannot be completely estimated only by yeast models.

4. Models Based on Invertebrates

4.1. Advantages of Multicellular Models

Models of neurodegenerative diseases based on multicellular animals have several specific properties that are not available for unicellular systems. The most significant is the ability to simulate the systemic processes of the human body: the functioning of intercellular signaling pathways, the restoration of the nervous system after cell death and the distribution of proteins with an abnormal tertiary structure inside the body ^[10]^[43]^[44].

One of the most important fields of application for animal models of neurodegenerative diseases is aging. Aging is a universal process in which the normal functions of cells in multicellular organisms are disrupted; there is also a loss of the tissues’ ability to renew and maintain a functional state. Aging is characterized by a number of pathological processes caused by:

The loss of the ability of cells and tissues to maintain normal cell death processes;
Disorders in the utilization of misfolded and aggregated proteins that are toxic;
The accumulation of cellular debris due to disorders of the autophagolysosomal apparatus;
The uncontrolled course of inflammatory processes, mainly in the CNS.

The aggregation of abnormal proteins is considered one of the main causes of the development of neurodegenerative diseases associated with aging. The main questions which are yet to be answered by researchers of each specific disease are as follows:

What does the toxic activity of abnormal protein aggregates look like at the molecular level?
Is there a relationship between aggregation and toxicity?
Do protein aggregates observed in neurodegenerative diseases have any common properties, including pathological ones?
Why are these diseases associated with aging?
What causes the development of pathologies associated with a particular cell type ^[45]?

4.2. Invertebrates as Models for Neurodegenerative Disorders

The role of multicellular models is to approximate molecular biology data from single-cell models to fundamental processes such as growth, morphogenesis, aging, stress adaptation, synaptic network formation, and neurodegenerative processes. Models of neurodegenerative diseases based on invertebrates have several characteristic features, which could provide answers to the above questions, the most significant of which are the following:

(A) Presence of specialized cells and tissues. Unlike previous types of models, in a multicellular organism, several types of cells that perform different functions are combined into a system where they have a direct or indirect effect on each other. An example is the interaction of neuroglia with neurons, which is one of the key aspects of the accumulation and distribution of amyloids in the nervous system ^[46].

(B) Evolutionary relationship. Despite the fact that the external differences between humans and Drosophila seem colossal, at the molecular level there are significant similarities and conservatism, especially in the mechanisms of morphogenesis, autophagy, and cell death. An example is the signaling cascades including Wnt proteins. Wnt proteins are a family of secreted glycoproteins responsible for patterning embryonic development, gastrulation, formation of synaptic connections, axonal remodeling, regulation of cell proliferation, stem cell development, and many other processes. Wnt protein binds to the frizzled receptor (Fz), which has seven transmembrane domains and is topologically similar to G-protein coupled receptors, which leads to the separation of the GSK3, Axin, and APC protein complexes. In turn, this prevents the phosphorylation of β-catenin. This protein, in its unphosphorylated form, enters the nucleus and binds there to transcription factors ^[47].

An example of a direct application of evolutionary conservatism in the field of neurodegenerative disease models is the neuroprotective effect of lithium ions. From ancient times to the present day they have been used to treat nervous disorders ^[48]^[49]^[50]. Research aimed at studying the mechanism of action of lithium ions on Dr. melanogaster has shown that these ions affect the canonical (β-catenin-dependent) Wnt pathway ^[51]. Transgenic flies capable of synthesizing and accumulating β-amyloid were used in the study of Jans et al. ^[50]. During the development of Alzheimer’s disease, Wnt signaling is disrupted because migrating β-amyloids increase the level of GSK3 in the intercellular space, which, in turn, leads to the inactivation of β-catenin and inhibition of the expression of proneural genes. Proneural genes are known for their ability to bring brain stem cells out of dormancy, stimulating their proliferation and differentiation ^[52]^[53]^[54]. Since the loss of the brain’s ability to renew itself and recover from damaging effects is one of the key factors in the development of neurodegenerative disorders, the use of lithium preparations that inhibit GSK3 will have a complex effect on the central nervous system. A thorough study of such mechanisms (which change rarely in the course of evolution) and molecular homologies would not only explain the action of existing drugs but also create a foundation for the development of new, more effective drugs.

(C) The presence of nervous activity and behavior. Behavioral changes, especially in basic responses such as foraging and spatial orientation, are among the most easily recorded signs. Since the main goal of research in neurodegenerative diseases is the restoration of normal intellectual and social functions in patients, behavioral changes in animal models are still of great value to researchers, because due to the relative evolutionary conservatism of many molecular and signaling pathways, they allow for the establishment of parallels between the behavior of experimental animals, including invertebrates, and humans suffering from neurodegeneration ^[55].

(D) Autophagy. Invertebrates are also a classic model for studying autophagy processes in neurodegeneration and are often used to study several signaling pathways and molecular cascades.

4.3. Use of C. elegans as a Model for Studying the Processes of Cell Death and Autophagy

The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is a quite convenient model for the study of cell death. The advantage of this model is the constancy of the cellular composition. Adult hermaphroditic individuals have 959 somatic nuclei, and the number of nerve cells is 302 ^[56]. All the connections formed by nerve cells are also fixed ^[57]. This allows describing of a connectome, comprising a complete structure of the nerve connections in the body The connectome makes it possible to comprehensively describe the structure and functional role of synaptic connections both within the brain and within the whole body, including neurodegenerative processes. Connectomics-based approaches allow the nervous system to be modeled as a network of interconnected structures, which makes it possible to draw conclusions about how dynamic changes in the function of the nervous system can be associated with structural changes.

The advantage of using C. elegans as a connectome model lies not only in the small number of cells and its determinism but also in the permeability of the worm body to light, which makes it possible to conduct studies with fluorescent proteins included in nerve cells ^[58]. For example, the complex action of factors leading to neuronal death, such as mutations in superoxide dismutase-1 and in the TDP-43 protein, leads to the appearance of the areas in the worm body where neurons and glial cells die; therefore, when the body of a worm is studied with the help of a fluorescent microscope, these areas look dark ^[59]^[60].

5. Mammals-Based Models

5.1. Advantages of Using Mammals

The use of mammals as model organisms is due to their physiological, anatomical and genetic similarity to humans. For centuries mammals have acted as a ‘visual aid’, a source of knowledge about the structure of the human body—the data obtained during the autopsy of animal corpses have served to create an increasingly detailed diagram of the human body structure since ancient times. Moreover, although even then the researchers realized that human and animal organisms are not absolutely identical, the fact that there is a significant similarity between humans and other mammalian species was undeniable.

Today animal models, including neurodegenerative diseases, while still playing an important role in the study of human diseases, are experiencing serious competition from alternative systems, especially in vitro culture models. The reason is the difficulty of reproducing the symptoms of neurodegenerative disorders in the animal body. One of the main approaches in the degenerations study is the search for a new gene (or a mutant version of an already studied gene) responsible for the development of pathology, as well as proteins and protein complexes that can become disease markers. The data obtained form the basis of a model organism and act as a kind of guideline in its creation. The problem is that neurodegenerative processes in many cases occur sporadically without affecting the hereditary apparatus of the cell. In Alzheimer’s disease more than 90% of cases occur sporadically, and the exact cause of their development is unknown (it is assumed that in this case the main role is played by epigenetic mechanisms) ^[61]. In addition, there are significant genetic and biochemical differences between the organisms of model mammals and humans despite the evolutionary closeness, due to which the animal model is almost never a complete copy of the sick person organism in terms of phenotype ^[10]. However, their complete replacement remains impossible for several reasons:

The necessity to study the molecular mechanisms and mechanisms of initiation of proteinopathy. The neurodegenerative process can be considered in its entirety, considering the influence of all organs and systems of the body, even if phenotypically the degeneration is not fully manifested;
The relative ease of maintaining the model system;
The presence of age-related changes as a natural process inherent in the body of an animal. Aging, being a systemic process of reducing the body’s ability to maintain its functional state, is the main risk factor for a number of diseases, including neurodegenerative ones;
Highly organized immune system;
Presence of complex neural activity and behavior (especially in primate-based models).

5.2. The Use of Mammals to Model Aging Processes

For gerontological research, various animal models of mammals have been used for a long time and have shown success ^[62]^[63].

5.3. The study of Oxidative Stress Processes as a Factor in the Development of Neurodegenerative Diseases

Chronic oxidative stress is associated with damage to mitochondria and it is one of the causes of neurodegenerative disorder development ^[64]. Evidence from multiple studies suggests that mitochondria play a central role in aging-associated neurodegenerative diseases ^[3]. Mitochondria are able to influence the processes of cell death for many reasons, among which two main problems can be distinguished: the first one is mutations in mitochondrial DNA and oxidative stress, and the second—is the interaction of proteins specific for disorders of the nervous system with mitochondria ^[3].

The role of mitochondria and mitochondrial proteins in the development of neurodegenerative diseases is best studied for Parkinson’s disease. In most cases this disease is idiopathic, but there are rare hereditary forms, some of which are monogenic ^[65]^[66]. Observations have shown that the development of hereditary Parkinson’s disease may be due to a mutation in the genes of one of the five proteins responsible for the functioning of mitochondria—α-synuclein, parkin, DJ-1, PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1), and leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2). It is believed that mitochondrial dysfunctions are the direct and one of the main causes of the death of dopaminergic neurons in Parkinson’s disease ^[43].

Mice have proved to be convenient animal models for the investigation of mitochondria and oxidative stress involvement in neurodegenerative processes due to the high degree of similarity with humans at the anatomical and molecular levels. At 25 weeks of age, test mice show symptoms of neurodegenerative disorders that simply could not be modeled in Dr. melanogaster or C. elegans: alopecia, cardiomyopathy, osteoporosis, anemia, sarcopenia and kyphosis ^[3].

5.4. The Use of Mammals to Study the Role of the Immune System in the Neuropathology Development

Autoimmune reactions are the risk factors for the development of neurodegenerative processes. Adaptive immune response cells, especially Th cells, play an important role in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis ^[67]. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis has been the main animal model of multiple sclerosis for decades. It consists of inducing autoimmunity in mice after injection of peptides from myelin emulsified in an adjuvant ^[68]. Researchers have shown that myelin-reactive Th1 or Th17 cells can cause adaptive encephalomyelitis in mice; however, histopathological results obtained for CD4+ T cell populations differ from each other. Animals treated with Th1 cells had a more pronounced macrophage response, while mice with Th17 cells showed higher neutrophil infiltration ^[4]. These differences are significant because, although neutrophils and macrophages are phagocytic cells, only macrophages are antigen-presenting cells. They can then activate adaptive immune cells, which promotes a chronic inflammatory response. Moreover, the previously described data suggest that Th1 and Th17 cells play an important role in the development of lesions in MS, given that both effector populations can cause inflammation in the CNS and demyelinating lesions. However, their effector mechanisms differ from each other. Applications of existing and the creation of new experimental animal models are of significant importance for the investigation of neurodegenerative diseases due to the complicated structure of the immune system and its invaluable role in the progression of nerve cell death.

5.5. Behavioral Disorders Modeling

The ability to study complex behavioral reactions resulting from disorders of the structure and functions of the nervous system is a unique feature of animal models of neurodegenerative disorders. Experiments on mice have shown that an increased level of pro-inflammatory cytokines corresponds to a state similar to depression ^[69]. Mutations in the TDP-43 protein also affect behavior. TDP-43 is an important protein that affects the processing of a large number of target RNAs ^[70] and its ubiquitous deletion in mice results in embryonic death ^[71]^[72]. Though it is important to note that the spectrum of TDP-43-associated RNAs differs between species, and the changes in RNA processing caused by loss of function in TDP-43 differ significantly between mice and humans ^[10]. Mutations in TDP-43 lead to the development of some neurodegenerative diseases, for instance, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. There are many models expressing human TLR-43 based on transgenic rodents. Overexpression of TDP-43 induces a lethal phenotype in mice regardless of the presence of the mutation. However, mice with an expression level close to endogenous TDP-43 develop mutant and age-dependent neurological disorders, including motor and cognitive disorders, motor neuron degeneration and neuromuscular disorders, with the exception of paralysis, which is not observed. TDP-43Q331K knockout animals develop mild cognitive dysfunction without spinal motor neuron degeneration ^[73]. Due to the complexity and specificity, modeling of behavioral reactions cannot be reproduced in any other way except using animal models of neurodegenerative diseases.

6. Organoid Models of Neurodegenerative Diseases

6.1. General Characteristics of Organoid Models

Organoids are called cultural model systems derived from stem cells and have a spatial structure that ensures their correspondence with human organs. In other words, the goal of creating organoid models is to reproduce a small copy of an organ under controlled in vitro conditions.

Approaches based on the use of animal models have made it possible to reveal the basic principles of the development of many pathologies. However, the results obtained when working with such model systems could not be directly extrapolated to the human body. There are a number of mechanisms that are specific to the human body that cannot be modeled in other animals. The most striking example is brain development. The human brain is a structure unique in its complexity, variability and functional plasticity. The processes of memory formation, conditioned reflexes and, ultimately, higher nervous activity, which underlies the evolutionary success of man as a biological species, are provided by constant changes in the structure of the brain, restructuring of synaptic connections, removal of old and the creation of new nerve circuits. At the same time, many mechanisms of the functional reorganization of the brain (especially the regions of the cerebral cortex responsible for rational activity) are unique to humans and cannot be modeled even in anthropoid primates. Differences already exist at the level of gene expression patterns. Thus, researchers from the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory ^[74] analyzed gene expression patterns in different regions of the chimpanzee and human brain. It was shown that these patterns differ, and in one of the regions, these differences reach 10%. The greatest interspecies differences in expression were observed for duplicated genes. Another difference, even more significant from the point of view of the development of neuropathology and disorders of the brain structure, is structural differences. Significant variations in the density and number of neurons have been observed between different primate species, including between humans and chimpanzees ^[75]. Creating a model capable of reproducing the spatial structure of the brain would overcome these limitations. This is especially important for research in the field of traumatology since brain injuries can be one of the risk factors for the development of neurodegenerative diseases.

All types of models that have been discussed so far do not include human cells and tissues; therefore, they do not allow the direct ‘transfer’ of the obtained data to the human body. Even the smallest genetic and molecular differences could affect the signaling cascade leading to the accumulation of toxic proteins or, conversely, reduce the effectiveness of the drug that suppresses this process.

Thus, the emergence of three-dimensional cultures of human cells, based on stem cells obtained from various organs, has become an important step in overcoming these limitations.

6.2. Use of Organoid Models for Research in the Field of Regeneration and Traumatology

Organoid models open prospects not only for creating systems for searching for the neurodegenerative processes mechanisms and testing drugs, but also for modeling processes associated with direct damage to brain tissues (as, for example, in mechanical trauma), and, possibly, treatment of brain-damaged areas with using organoid transplants grown on the basis of stem cells taken from a patient.

Despite significant progress in the prevention of mechanical brain damage in terms of ensuring transport and industrial safety, disorders of nervous activity caused by the consequences of traumatic brain injuries still pose a serious threat to human health. The key to effectively eliminating the consequences of traumatic brain injury is to treat them as a chronic process with a wide range of pathophysiological disorders, one of which is an increased risk of neurodegenerative diseases. The use of organelles to establish the relationship between trauma and neurodegeneration, as well as to deeply study the degenerative processes caused by damage to the brain tissue at the molecular, cellular and tissue levels, is justified for several reasons:

The impossibility of reliable reproduction of inflammatory and degenerative processes associated with brain injuries in animal models, especially in rodents. In addition to differences between humans and model animals at the molecular level, interspecies differences in brain structure are a significant factor, such as different ratios of gray and white matter, the density of neurons in the cortex, and a number of other structural differences ^[75]. Simulation accuracy is improved when using large animals such as pigs or primates. However, in this case, the duration of the experiment and its resource consumption increase significantly;
The ability to fully trace the cell path, from pluripotent stem cells to nerve and glial cells, so that changes in the architecture of the nervous tissue could be observed in real-time. In most methods of working with animal models, only a certain time ‘slice’ of structures is considered, corresponding to their state at a certain point in time;
Creation within the model of niches with a unique microenvironment. The cell cultures used to model the long-term effects of brain injury prior to the introduction of organoid models into practice had a quite simple structure. For the most part, these are single-layer or multilayer structures containing one or more cell types ^[76]. Organoid models, due to their complex structure, are able to reproduce the microenvironment specific to cells in the composition of an organ, so they have greater potential for research compared to cell cultures ^[77]^[78].

Organoid models are actively used to study the influence of the microenvironment on the emergence and development of brain tumors ^[77]^[79]. Organoid models of brain tumors make it possible to consider the process of tumorigenesis in the brain as a set of interactions between microglia and other types of glial cells, stromal cells, neurons, cancer cells proper, recruited macrophages associated with tumors, as well as the influence of the blood-brain barrier and extracellular matrix components on tumors ^[77]. The use of a similar approach in relation to neurodegenerative diseases is justified by the fact that in both cases the process is of a chronic nature, occurs with the involvement of cells of surrounding tissues and is associated with the loss of the immune system’s ability to maintain homeostasis at the tissue and cellular levels, namely, the destruction of defective cells and stopping their impact on healthy cells ^[10]^[77]^[80].

One of the microenvironmental factors that are common for both brain tumorigenesis and neurodegenerative diseases is local inflammation. The key component of these reactions is RAGE receptors (Receptor for Advanced Glycation end products). In addition to that, these receptors play an important role in the development of diabetes, as well as heart and kidney failure ^[81]. Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) may be present in food or produced endogenously in biological systems. Their formation is associated with chronic neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis ^[81]^[82]. The role of glycosylation end products in neurodegeneration is their ability to bind to AGE-specific receptors and the ability of their precursors to induce the so-called ‘dicarbonyl stress’, which leads to protein cross-linking and damage ^[83]^[84].

7. Conclusion

The results of the data analysis on neurodegenerative disease models suggest that all types of models have characteristic properties that make them optimal tools for studying one or another aspect of neurodegenerative diseases. Bacterial and yeast models have shown themselves to be universal and unpretentious ‘protein factories’, suitable not only for studying evolutionarily conservative molecular mechanisms but also for the synthesis of transgenic proteins responsible for the onset and course of degenerative processes in the human body. The advantages of animal models lie in the ability to show the effect of neurodegenerations on the body as a complex promising type. Their main advantage is the ability to trace the development of degenerations as sequential, chronic processes. Besides, organoid models have demonstrated their applicability not only as models but also as potential sources of transplants for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases and conditions leading to them. At present, there is no universal model that can reflect all aspects of such a complex process as neurodegeneration. Therefore, it is advisable to use a complex consisting of models of different origins, simultaneously exploring not only processes at the molecular and cellular levels, but also the influence of environmental factors, such as the composition of the microbiome, stress and intellectual load. This complex can be organized in two forms. The first form appears as a kind of ‘step-by-step’, where each model is a separate step, allowing one to use information from the previous step to gradually study more and more complex processes. Thus, transgenic bacterial models would serve to produce a protein of interest, yeast to study the dynamics of abnormal proteins, invertebrates to monitor processes such as cell death and neuroplasticity, mammals to cognitive impairment, and in vitro systems to test drugs and treatments. The second approach, based on the “network” organization of a complex of model systems, is more preferable. With the “network” approach, work is carried out simultaneously with several types of models, and work with each specific type is adjusted in accordance with data obtained from other parallel models (both more highly organized and less organized). An example is the creation of an in vitro continuous culture system that includes both human cells and microorganisms, the composition of which is adjusted in accordance with data on motor disorders that develop during life in mice with impaired intestinal microflora. A detailed analysis of the literature data presented allows people to state that the ‘network’ approach to the combination of individual model systems seems to be more promising and fruitful both from the point of view of fundamental biology and diagnostics and therapy.

Summarizing the data above, it can concluded be that the future of neurodegenerative disease research belongs to the ‘network’ models. The ‘network’ organized complex models are the most promising both for the fundamental investigation of the whole complex of causes leading to neurodegenerative disease development and for progress in the creation and development of approaches to their prevention and treatment.

References

Cascione, M.; De Matteis, V.; Leporatti, S.; Rinaldi, R. The New Frontiers in Neurodegenerative Diseases Treatment: Liposomal-Based Strategies. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 566767.
Durães, F.; Pinto, M.; Sousa, E. Old Drugs as New Treatments for Neurodegenerative Diseases. Pharmaceuticals 2018, 11, 44.
Lin, M.T.; Beal, M.F. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases. Nature 2006, 443, 787–795.
Fletcher, J.M.; Lalor, S.J.; Sweeney, C.M.; Tubridy, N.; Mills, K.H.G. T cells in multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2010, 162, 1–11.
Gitler, A.D.; Dhillon, P.; Shorter, J. Neurodegenerative disease: Models, mechanisms, and a new hope. Dis. Model. Mech. 2017, 10, 499–502.
Cai, L.; Huang, J. Schizophrenia and risk of dementia: A meta-analysis study. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2018, 14, 2047–2055.
Chin-Chan, M.; Navarro-Yepes, J.; Quintanilla-Vega, B. Environmental pollutants as risk factors for neurodegenerative disorders: Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 124.
Gupta, R.; Sen, N. Traumatic brain injury: A risk factor for neurodegenerative diseases. Rev. Neurosci. 2016, 27, 93–100.
Manciocco, A.; Chiarotti, F.; Vitale, A.; Calamandrei, G.; Laviola, G.; Alleva, E. The application of Russell and Burch 3R principle in rodent models of neurodegenerative disease: The case of Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2009, 33, 18–32.
Dawson, T.M.; Golde, T.E.; Lagier-Tourenne, C. Animal models of neurodegenerative diseases. Nat. Neurosci. 2018, 21, 1370–1379.
Jankowsky, J.L.; Savonenko, A.; Schilling, G.; Wang, J.; Xu, G.; Borchelt, D.R. Transgenic mouse models of neurodegenerative disease: Opportunities for therapeutic development. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2002, 2, 457–464.
Huillard d’Aignaux, J.; Costagliola, D.; Maccario, J.; Billette de Villemeur, T.; Brandel, J.P.; Deslys, J.P.; Hauw, J.J.; Chaussain, J.L.; Agid, Y.; Dormont, D.; et al. Incubation period of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in human growth hormone recipients in France. Neurology 1999, 53, 1197–1201.
Mackenzie, G.; Will, R. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: Recent developments. F1000Research 2017, 6, 2053.
Puderbaugh, M.; Emmady, P.D. Neuroplasticity; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022.
Quigley, E.M.M. Microbiota-Brain-Gut Axis and Neurodegenerative Diseases. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2017, 17, 94.
Raimondi, I.; Izzo, L.; Tunesi, M.; Comar, M.; Albani, D.; Giordano, C. Organ-On-A-Chip in vitro Models of the Brain and the Blood-Brain Barrier and Their Value to Study the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in Neurodegeneration. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 435.
Friedland, R.P.; McMillan, J.D.; Kurlawala, Z. What Are the Molecular Mechanisms by Which Functional Bacterial Amyloids Influence Amyloid Beta Deposition and Neuroinflammation in Neurodegenerative Disorders? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1652.
Chen, S.G.; Stribinskis, V.; Rane, M.J.; Demuth, D.R.; Gozal, E.; Roberts, A.M.; Jagadapillai, R.; Liu, R.; Choe, K.; Shivakumar, B.; et al. Exposure to the Functional Bacterial Amyloid Protein Curli Enhances Alpha-Synuclein Aggregation in Aged Fischer 344 Rats and Caenorhabditis elegans. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 34477.
Ulusoy, A.; Phillips, R.J.; Helwig, M.; Klinkenberg, M.; Powley, T.L.; Di Monte, D.A. Brain-to-stomach transfer of α-synuclein via vagal preganglionic projections. Acta Neuropathol. 2017, 133, 381–393.
Kim, S.; Kwon, S.-H.; Kam, T.-I.; Panicker, N.; Karuppagounder, S.S.; Lee, S.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, W.R.; Kook, M.; Foss, C.A.; et al. Transneuronal Propagation of Pathologic α-Synuclein from the Gut to the Brain Models Parkinson’s Disease. Neuron 2019, 103, 627–641.e7.
Ceppa, F.A.; Izzo, L.; Sardelli, L.; Raimondi, I.; Tunesi, M.; Albani, D.; Giordano, C. Human Gut-Microbiota Interaction in Neurodegenerative Disorders and Current Engineered Tools for Its Modeling. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 297.
Van de Wiele, T.; Van den Abbeele, P.; Ossieur, W.; Possemiers, S.; Marzorati, M. The Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem (SHIME®). In The Impact of Food Bioactives on Health; Verhoeckx, K., Cotter, P., López-Expósito, I., Kleiveland, C., Lea, T., Mackie, A., Requena, T., Swiatecka, D., Wichers, H., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Swtzerland, 2015; pp. 305–317. ISBN 978-3-319-15791-7.
Raimondi, M.T.; Albani, D.; Giordano, C. An Organ-On-A-Chip Engineered Platform to Study the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in Neurodegeneration. Trends Mol. Med. 2019, 25, 737–740.
Ferrer-Miralles, N.; Villaverde, A. Bacterial cell factories for recombinant protein production; expanding the catalogue. Microb. Cell Fact. 2013, 12, 113.
Prusiner, S.B. Prions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 13363–13383.
Legname, G.; Baskakov, I.V.; Nguyen, H.-O.B.; Riesner, D.; Cohen, F.E.; DeArmond, S.J.; Prusiner, S.B. Synthetic mammalian prions. Science 2004, 305, 673–676.
Sherman, M.Y.; Muchowski, P.J. Making yeast tremble: Yeast models as tools to study neurodegenerative disorders. Neuromol. Med. 2003, 4, 133–146.
Muchowski, P.J.; Wacker, J.L. Modulation of neurodegeneration by molecular chaperones. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2005, 6, 11–22.
Clark, J.I.; Muchowski, P.J. Small heat-shock proteins and their potential role in human disease. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2000, 10, 52–59.
Sherman, M.Y.; Goldberg, A.L. Cellular defenses against unfolded proteins: A cell biologist thinks about neurodegenerative diseases. Neuron 2001, 29, 15–32.
Hsiao, K.; Baker, H.F.; Crow, T.J.; Poulter, M.; Owen, F.; Terwilliger, J.D.; Westaway, D.; Ott, J.; Prusiner, S.B. Linkage of a prion protein missense variant to Gerstmann-Sträussler syndrome. Nature 1989, 338, 342–345.
Goate, A.; Chartier-Harlin, M.C.; Mullan, M.; Brown, J.; Crawford, F.; Fidani, L.; Giuffra, L.; Haynes, A.; Irving, N.; James, L. Segregation of a missense mutation in the amyloid precursor protein gene with familial Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 1991, 349, 704–706.
Polymeropoulos, M.H.; Lavedan, C.; Leroy, E.; Ide, S.E.; Dehejia, A.; Dutra, A.; Pike, B.; Root, H.; Rubenstein, J.; Boyer, R.; et al. Mutation in the alpha-synuclein gene identified in families with Parkinson’s disease. Science 1997, 276, 2045–2047.
Sharma, D.; Masison, D.C. Hsp70 structure, function, regulation and influence on yeast prions. Protein Pept. Lett. 2009, 16, 571–581.
Thibaudeau, T.A.; Anderson, R.T.; Smith, D.M. A common mechanism of proteasome impairment by neurodegenerative disease-associated oligomers. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1097.
Sciarretta, S.; Maejima, Y.; Zablocki, D.; Sadoshima, J. The Role of Autophagy in the Heart. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2018, 80, 1–26.
García-Martínez, M.Á.; Montejo González, J.C.; García-de-Lorenzo y Mateos, A.; Teijeira, S. Muscle weakness: Understanding the principles of myopathy and neuropathy in the critically ill patient and the management options. Clin. Nutr. 2020, 39, 1331–1344.
Menzies, F.M.; Fleming, A.; Caricasole, A.; Bento, C.F.; Andrews, S.P.; Ashkenazi, A.; Füllgrabe, J.; Jackson, A.; Jimenez Sanchez, M.; Karabiyik, C.; et al. Autophagy and Neurodegeneration: Pathogenic Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities. Neuron 2017, 93, 1015–1034.
Cebollero, E.; Reggiori, F. Regulation of autophagy in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2009, 1793, 1413–1421.
Levine, B.; Klionsky, D.J. Development by self-digestion: Molecular mechanisms and biological functions of autophagy. Dev. Cell 2004, 6, 463–477.
Hale, A.N.; Ledbetter, D.J.; Gawriluk, T.R.; Rucker, E.B. 3rd Autophagy: Regulation and role in development. Autophagy 2013, 9, 951–972.
Noda, T.; Ohsumi, Y. Tor, a phosphatidylinositol kinase homologue, controls autophagy in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 3963–3966.
Trancikova, A.; Tsika, E.; Moore, D.J. Mitochondrial dysfunction in genetic animal models of Parkinson’s disease. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2012, 16, 896–919.
Mitchell, S.J.; Scheibye-Knudsen, M.; Longo, D.L.; de Cabo, R. Animal models of aging research: Implications for human aging and age-related diseases. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2015, 3, 283–303.
Link, C.D. Invertebrate models of Alzheimer’s disease. Genes. Brain. Behav. 2005, 4, 147–156.
McGeer, P.L.; McGeer, E.G. Glial cell reactions in neurodegenerative diseases: Pathophysiology and therapeutic interventions. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 1998, 12 (Suppl. 2), S1–S6.
Logan, C.Y.; Nusse, R. The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2004, 20, 781–810.
Strobusch, A.D.; Jefferson, J.W. The checkered history of lithium in medicine. Pharm. Hist. 1980, 22, 72–76.
Phiel, C.J.; Klein, P.S. Molecular targets of lithium action. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2001, 41, 789–813.
Jans, K.; Lüersen, K.; Rimbach, G. Drosophila melanogaster as a Model Organism to Study Lithium and Boron Bioactivity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1710.
Komiya, Y.; Habas, R. Wnt signal transduction pathways. Organogenesis 2008, 4, 68–75.
Dale, T.C. Signal transduction by the Wnt family of ligands. Biochem. J. 1998, 329 Pt 2, 209–223.
Hooper, C.; Killick, R.; Lovestone, S. The GSK3 hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurochem. 2008, 104, 1433–1439.
Shruster, A.; Eldar-Finkelman, H.; Melamed, E.; Offen, D. Wnt signaling pathway overcomes the disruption of neuronal differentiation of neural progenitor cells induced by oligomeric amyloid β-peptide. J. Neurochem. 2011, 116, 522–529.
Yao, C.; El Khoury, R.; Wang, W.; Byrd, T.A.; Pehek, E.A.; Thacker, C.; Zhu, X.; Smith, M.A.; Wilson-Delfosse, A.L.; Chen, S.G. LRRK2-mediated neurodegeneration and dysfunction of dopaminergic neurons in a Caenorhabditis elegans model of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2010, 40, 73–81.
Tilleman, L.; Germani, F.; De Henau, S.; Geuens, E.; Hoogewijs, D.; Braeckman, B.P.; Vanfleteren, J.R.; Moens, L.; Dewilde, S. Globins in Caenorhabditis elegans. IUBMB Life 2011, 63, 166–174.
White, J.G.; Southgate, E.; Thomson, J.N.; Brenner, S. The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 1986, 314, 1–340.
Cornaglia, M.; Krishnamani, G.; Mouchiroud, L.; Sorrentino, V.; Lehnert, T.; Auwerx, J.; Gijs, M.A.M. Automated longitudinal monitoring of in vivo protein aggregation in neurodegenerative disease C. elegans models. Mol. Neurodegener. 2016, 11, 17.
Ash, P.E.A.; Zhang, Y.-J.; Roberts, C.M.; Saldi, T.; Hutter, H.; Buratti, E.; Petrucelli, L.; Link, C.D. Neurotoxic effects of TDP-43 overexpression in C. elegans. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010, 19, 3206–3218.
Baskoylu, S.N.; Yersak, J.; O’Hern, P.; Grosser, S.; Simon, J.; Kim, S.; Schuch, K.; Dimitriadi, M.; Yanagi, K.S.; Lins, J.; et al. Single copy/knock-in models of ALS SOD1 in C. elegans suggest loss and gain of function have different contributions to cholinergic and glutamatergic neurodegeneration. PLoS Genet. 2018, 14, e1007682.
Piaceri, I.; Nacmias, B.; Sorbi, S. Genetics of familial and sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Biosci. (Elite Ed.) 2013, 5, 167–177.
Spangler, E.L.; Ingram, D.K. Utilization of the rat as a model of mammalian aging: Impact of pathology on behavior. Gerontology 1996, 42, 301–311.
Flurkey, K.; Currer, J.M.; Harrison, D.E. Mouse Models in Aging Research. In The Mouse in Biomedical Research; Fox, J.G., Davisson, M.T., Quimby, F.W., Barthold, S.W., Newcomer, C.E., Smith, A.L., Eds.; American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine; Elsevier: Burlington, VT, USA, 2007; pp. 637–672. ISBN 978-0-12-369454-6.
Solleiro-Villavicencio, H.; Rivas-Arancibia, S. Effect of Chronic Oxidative Stress on Neuroinflammatory Response Mediated by CD4(+)T Cells in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 114.
Pilotto, A.; Padovani, A.; Borroni, B. Clinical, biological, and imaging features of monogenic Alzheimer’s Disease. Biomed Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 689591.
Pihlstrøm, L.; Wiethoff, S.; Houlden, H. Genetics of neurodegenerative diseases: An overview. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2017, 145, 309–323.
Carlson, T.; Kroenke, M.; Rao, P.; Lane, T.E.; Segal, B. The Th17-ELR+ CXC chemokine pathway is essential for the development of central nervous system autoimmune disease. J. Exp. Med. 2008, 205, 811–823.
Robinson, A.P.; Harp, C.T.; Noronha, A.; Miller, S.D. The experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model of MS: Utility for understanding disease pathophysiology and treatment. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2014, 122, 173–189.
Svensson, M.; Lexell, J.; Deierborg, T. Effects of Physical Exercise on Neuroinflammation, Neuroplasticity, Neurodegeneration, and Behavior: What We Can Learn From Animal Models in Clinical Settings. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 2015, 29, 577–589.
Neumann, M.; Sampathu, D.M.; Kwong, L.K.; Truax, A.C.; Micsenyi, M.C.; Chou, T.T.; Bruce, J.; Schuck, T.; Grossman, M.; Clark, C.M.; et al. Ubiquitinated TDP-43 in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science 2006, 314, 130–133.
Sephton, C.F.; Good, S.K.; Atkin, S.; Dewey, C.M.; Mayer, P., 3rd; Herz, J.; Yu, G. TDP-43 is a developmentally regulated protein essential for early embryonic development. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 6826–6834.
Wu, L.-S.; Cheng, W.-C.; Hou, S.-C.; Yan, Y.-T.; Jiang, S.-T.; Shen, C.-K.J. TDP-43, a neuro-pathosignature factor, is essential for early mouse embryogenesis. Genesis 2010, 48, 56–62.
White, M.A.; Kim, E.; Duffy, A.; Adalbert, R.; Phillips, B.U.; Peters, O.M.; Stephenson, J.; Yang, S.; Massenzio, F.; Lin, Z.; et al. TDP-43 gains function due to perturbed autoregulation in a Tardbp knock-in mouse model of ALS-FTD. Nat. Neurosci. 2018, 21, 552–563.
Khaitovich, P.; Muetzel, B.; She, X.; Lachmann, M.; Hellmann, I.; Dietzsch, J.; Steigele, S.; Do, H.-H.; Weiss, G.; Enard, W.; et al. Regional patterns of gene expression in human and chimpanzee brains. Genome Res. 2004, 14, 1462–1473.
Semendeferi, K.; Teffer, K.; Buxhoeveden, D.P.; Park, M.S.; Bludau, S.; Amunts, K.; Travis, K.; Buckwalter, J. Spatial organization of neurons in the frontal pole sets humans apart from great apes. Cereb. Cortex 2011, 21, 1485–1497.
Jgamadze, D.; Johnson, V.E.; Wolf, J.A.; Cullen, D.K.; Song, H.; Ming, G.-L.; Smith, D.H.; Chen, H.I. Modeling traumatic brain injury with human brain organoids. Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. 2020, 14, 52–58.
Pasqualini, C.; Kozaki, T.; Bruschi, M.; Nguyen, T.H.H.; Minard-Colin, V.; Castel, D.; Grill, J.; Ginhoux, F. Modeling the Interaction between the Microenvironment and Tumor Cells in Brain Tumors. Neuron 2020, 108, 1025–1044.
Xia, T.; Du, W.-L.; Chen, X.-Y.; Zhang, Y.-N. Organoid models of the tumor microenvironment and their applications. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2021, 25, 5829–5841.
Azzarelli, R. Organoid Models of Glioblastoma to Study Brain Tumor Stem Cells. Front. cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 220.
Leonardi, G.C.; Accardi, G.; Monastero, R.; Nicoletti, F.; Libra, M. Ageing: From inflammation to cancer. Immun. Ageing 2018, 15, 1.
Rong, L.L.; Gooch, C.; Szabolcs, M.; Herold, K.C.; Lalla, E.; Hays, A.P.; Yan, S.F.; Yan, S.S.D.; Schmidt, A.M. RAGE: A journey from the complications of diabetes to disorders of the nervous system—Striking a fine balance between injury and repair. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 2005, 23, 355–365.
Jiang, X.; Wang, X.; Tuo, M.; Ma, J.; Xie, A. RAGE and its emerging role in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci. Lett. 2018, 672, 65–69.
Ahmed, N.; Thornalley, P.J. Advanced glycation endproducts: What is their relevance to diabetic complications? Diabetes. Obes. Metab. 2007, 9, 233–245.
Grillo, M.A.; Colombatto, S. Advanced glycation end-products (AGEs): Involvement in aging and in neurodegenerative diseases. Amino Acids 2008, 35, 29–36.

© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Upload a video for this entry

Information

Subjects: Biology

Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :

Viacheslav Igorevich Pasko

Aleksandra Sergeevna Churkina

Anton Shakhov

Anatoly Alexeevich Kotlobay

Irina Alieva

View Times: 395

Update Date: 18 Jan 2023

Table of Contents

Video Upload Options

Confirm