Your browser does not fully support modern features. Please upgrade for a smoother experience.
Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic. For video creation, please contact our Academic Video Service.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 Maria Ladeynova -- 7220 2023-01-11 11:53:15 |
2 format Jason Zhu Meta information modification 7220 2023-01-12 06:13:41 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Academic Video Service to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Ladeynova, M.;  Kuznetsova, D.;  Mudrilov, M.;  Vodeneev, V. Integration of Electrical Signals and Phytohormones. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/40026 (accessed on 29 March 2026).
Ladeynova M,  Kuznetsova D,  Mudrilov M,  Vodeneev V. Integration of Electrical Signals and Phytohormones. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/40026. Accessed March 29, 2026.
Ladeynova, Maria, Darya Kuznetsova, Maxim Mudrilov, Vladimir Vodeneev. "Integration of Electrical Signals and Phytohormones" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/40026 (accessed March 29, 2026).
Ladeynova, M.,  Kuznetsova, D.,  Mudrilov, M., & Vodeneev, V. (2023, January 11). Integration of Electrical Signals and Phytohormones. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/40026
Ladeynova, Maria, et al. "Integration of Electrical Signals and Phytohormones." Encyclopedia. Web. 11 January, 2023.
Integration of Electrical Signals and Phytohormones
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/ijms24010847

Plants are constantly exposed to environmental stresses. Local stimuli sensed by one part of a plant are translated into long-distance signals that can influence the activities in distant tissues. Changes in levels of phytohormones in distant parts of the plant occur in response to various local stimuli. The regulation of hormone levels can be mediated by long-distance electrical signals, which are also induced by local stimulation. The crosstalk between electrical signals and phytohormones is provided by interaction points and integration nodes that involve changes in pH, Ca2+ and ROS levels. Thus, electrical signals and hormones work together to induce a systemic response.

long-distance signaling electrical signals hormones jasmonate calcium systemic response plants

1. Introduction

Plants are in continuously changing environmental conditions and are exposed to a wide range of stresses, caused by exposure to extremes of temperature, excessive light, limited water and nutrient availability, pathogens and herbivore attacks. Environmental stimuli can arrive in a spatially and temporally heterogeneous manner, and so are sensed in separate plant parts, which perceive and transmit information about the stimulus to distant parts to induce a systemic adaptive response. Information about the stimulus is translated into a long-distance mobile signal, which influences the activity of processes in distant tissues. Plants can coordinate developmental or defense processes throughout their bodies, using hydraulic, electrical and chemical long-distance signals, which differ in their nature and speed of propagation [1].
A hydraulic signal is a wave of increased hydraulic pressure, which rapidly propagates through xylem vessels [1][2]. Pressure changes in xylem vessels are perceived by adjacent parenchyma cells as a mechanical signal, mediated by turgor pressure changes in these cells and by changes in membrane tension [3]. The propagation speed of hydraulic signals is high and can reach the speed of sound in water for a pressure wave, and tens of cm/s for hydraulic mass flow in xylem [1][2]. Electrical signals (ESs) are transient changes in the membrane potential, which quite rapidly propagate through tissues of the plant. The type of electrical signal depends on the type of the stimulus and ion fluxes involved in its generation. There are action potential (AP), variation potential (VP) and system potential (SP). Undamaging local stimuli (cold, touch, light/shadow) induce AP, short-term depolarization with a spike shape. Damaging local stimuli (wounding, burning, heating) induce VP, long-term transient depolarization which has an irregular shape. SP is a transient hyperpolarization generated in response to various stimuli. The propagation speed of ESs in plants ranges from a few mm to several cm per second and depends on the type of signal and plant species [1][2][4][5][6][7][8]. Chemical signals are transient changes in the concentration of various compounds, which include propagating waves of reactive oxygen species (ROS), changes in ion concentrations, such as Ca2+ waves, and also phytohormones, peptides and various volatile compounds. Chemical signals propagate through the plant at low speed, in general, from a few µm/s to several hundreds or thousands of µm/s [1][2][7].

2. Electrical Signals Are Involved in the Regulation of Stimulus-Induced Changes in Phytohormone Levels

2.1. Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Phytohormones in Response to Local Stimuli

Various local stresses induce changes in the content of phytohormones. Temporal and spatial dynamics are individual characteristics of each hormone that represent their particular physiological function and potential contribution to the systemic response. Understanding the spatiotemporal dynamics of phytohormones is necessary both to elucidate the role of individual hormones in the initiation and regulation of the physiological response and to determine potential ways of regulating phytohormone production.
Local stimuli induce changes in the phytohormone content both in tissues which are directly stressed in the stimulation zone, termed ‘local tissues’, and in tissues located at a long distance from this zone, termed ‘systemic tissues’. It is known that local and systemic changes in the concentration of phytohormones occur under the actions of local stimuli such as wounding [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], light stress (high light) [27][28], heat stress [28][29][30], burning [9][30][31][32][33][34] and herbivore attack or mechanical wounding with insect oral secretion treatment [10][20][21][25][35][36][37][38]. The time interval of phytohormone quantification after a local stimulation varies widely, from tens of seconds or a few minutes to several hours or days.
The most studied phytohormones, known for their involvement in responses to local stimuli, are jasmonates (JAs). The content of JAs rapidly increases after stimulation in local and systemic tissues. It is shown that the levels of jasmonic acid (JA) and its biologically active derivative, jasmonoyl-L-isoleucine (JA-Ile), increase within 0.7–5 min [11][14][17][22][24][27][28][30]. JA and JA-Ile attain peak levels generally in the time interval from 10 to 60 min in both local and systemic tissues [10][12][13][14][15][17][18][19][20][21][23][24][27][30][31][34][35][36]. After the peak, there is a gradual decline in the JA and JA-Ile content to resting levels, which is well expressed in systemic tissues, and is not always observed in local tissues. In some works, there is information about a later reaching of the peak levels of JA and JA-Ile in local tissues at 90 min after wounding [10][11][25], mechanical wounding with insect oral secretion treatment or herbivore attack [10][25][35]. On the other hand, the concentration of JA-Ile in some cases can remain high in local tissues for a long time after wounding; JA-Ile attains peak levels 360 min after stimulation [11][16].
The temporal dynamics of JA concentration in local and systemic tissues is generally similar, but quantitative differences in the levels of JAs are well expressed, which can be shown from works, where local and systemic changes in the concentration of JAs after the stimulation are studied simultaneously. In general, quantitatively, local changes exceed systemic ones. This dependence is characteristic of different types of local stimuli: mechanical wounding [9][13][14][16][22][23][25], light stress [27], burning [32] and the combined application of mechanical wounding and insect oral secretion [10][25]. However, there are single oppositive examples, which demonstrate that the local stimulus can induce a more expressed increase in JA concentration in systemic tissues than in local tissues. This dynamics is observed under high light treatment in Arabidopsis: JA levels reach a maximum 2 min after stimulation, and peak levels of JA in the systemic tissue were ~twofold higher than in the local tissue [28].
The dynamics of abscisic acid (ABA) has been studied in a much smaller number of works compared to JAs, and available information is rather contradictory. A local stimulus, generally, causes an increase in the content of ABA in local and systemic tissues [9][12][26][27][29][30][31][32][34]. There is information about the significant decrease in ABA concentration in the systemic leaf of Arabidopsis at 60 min after mechanical wounding compared with resting levels [23]. Meanwhile, ABA levels in systemic leaves may not change after local burning in tomato plants [32]. The ABA content in local and systemic tissues reaches its maximum in the time interval from 60 to 360 min [9][12][30][32][34]. However, there is evidence of a rapid (up to 15 min) increase in ABA concentration in local and systemic tissues upon high light treatment [27] and in systemic tissues upon burning [31]. It is difficult to determine exactly quantitative differences in the local and systemic dynamics of ABA; single works show that the increase in ABA concentration after stimulation in local tissues is more pronounced than in systemic tissues upon burning [32] and wounding [9].
The available studies on the dynamics of salicylic acid (SA) in response to local stimulation are rather few and contradictory. It is difficult to conclude about the features of the spatial and temporal dynamics of SA based on the limited data in the literature. Nevertheless, generally, SA concentration increases in local and systemic tissues in response to local stimuli [10][12][20][21][27][28][30]. In some studies, burning [31] and wounding [23][26] have no effect on SA levels in local and systemic tissues. SA concentration can reach its maximum in a relatively short time interval up to 40 min in systemic tissues [30]. In local tissues, the maximum concentration of SA is generally in the time interval from 60 to 180 min [10][15][20][21]. A quantitative comparison of local and systemic changes shows that in response to high light or heat treatment, the increase in SA concentration 8 min after stimulation in systemic Arabidopsis leaves has a greater amplitude compared to changes in local leaves [28]. In another work [27], the increase in SA content at 10 min in response to high light had comparable amplitudes in local and systemic leaves in Arabidopsis.
Studies of the dynamics of other phytohormones, with the exception of JA, JA-Ile, ABA and SA, in response to local stimuli are presented by single works. Wounding of Nicotiana tabacum leaves causes a decline in levels of endogenous indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) in wounded and unwounded regions of the leaf at 180 and 360 min time points [39]. Wounding of Arabidopsis thaliana leaves did not cause local changes in IAA content at 30 min [26], 60 min and 360 min [12] after stimulation. The levels of gibberellins in local leaves of Arabidopsis were also unchanged at 60 min and 360 min after mechanical wounding [12].
It is assumed that 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid (OPDA) is not only a JA precursor, but also a signaling molecule that activates OPDA-specific responses in an JA-independent manner [40]. In general, the local stimulus causes the increase in OPDA content in a wide time interval from 10 to 360 min in local and systemic tissues [12][17][20][25][36]. There is information about the rapid (<5 min) increase in OPDA levels in local and systemic tissues in response to high light [27], wounding [17] and after simulated herbivory treatments [36]. Comparison of local and systemic OPDA dynamics induced by a local wounding shows that in damaged local leaves, there is a gradual increase in OPDA concentration from 5 to 60 min after wounding, whereas in undamaged systemic leaves, OPDA levels rapidly decrease within 5 min and then slowly increase until 180 min [14]. In another work, OPDA levels were increased only in the local leaf 60 min after mechanical wounding [23]. There is also information that wounding does not affect the OPDA content in the local leaf 30 min after stimulation [26].
Thus, it is clearly seen that along with a sufficiently detailed study of the dynamics of JAs in response to local stimuli, works on the dynamics of ABA and SA are insufficient, and studies of the dynamics of other hormones are in its infancy and need further study. In particular, studies of the spatial dynamics of hormones in wide time intervals using different plant species are needed to confirm the universality/specificity of the observed patterns.

2.1.1. Specificity of Phytohormone Dynamics Induced by Local Stimuli of Different Nature

Phytohormone dynamics in local and systemic tissues depend on the nature of the local stimulus, which can be demonstrated by a number of examples. Correct comparison of changes in phytohormone content in response to different local stimuli is possible only when measurements are performed within the same work on the same plant material under similar conditions. Wounding causes a slightly greater increase in ABA concentration compared with burning in local tomato leaves, whereas JA levels increase equally in response to burning and wounding [9]. In Arabidopsis, heat stress induces a more pronounced increase in the JA content in local leaves compared to high light treatment [28]. In systemic leaves, the reverse is observed: only light stress causes an increase in JA levels, whereas heat stress does not cause changes in JA concentrations [28]. For SA, there is no specificity of dynamics in both local and systemic leaves [28]. Local gradual heating induced a more pronounced increase in JA, ABA and SA levels compared with local burning in systemic tissues of wheat plants; the temporal dynamics between stimuli were similar [30].
The specificity of hormone dynamics is best studied upon herbivore attack, the effects of which are complex and include mechanical wounding and elicitors of insect oral secretion. In local leaves of Arabidopsis, simulating an attack by the herbivorous insect Spodoptera littoralis causes a greater increase in JA and JA-Ile concentrations compared with mechanical wounding [20][25][41]; there are no such differences in the SA content [20]. Simulating an attack by the herbivorous insect Manduca sexta also induces a more pronounced increase in the JA and JA-Ile content [10][21], and in SA content [10] in local leaves of tobacco plants.
Differences in the dynamics of stress hormones, especially those expressed in quantitative changes, under the actions of stimuli of different nature indicate the role of phytohormones in the transmission of stimulus-specific information; therefore, hormones may be one of the necessary mediators in the regulation of the stimulus-specific systemic response. In turn, the specificity of phytohormone dynamics is most likely due to the specificity of long-distance signals, in particular ESs [42], which propagate from the stimulation site and induce changes in the phytohormone content in unstimulated systemic tissues.

2.2. Mechanisms of Regulation of Changes in Phytohormone Levels by Electrical Signals

The stimulus-induced systemic accumulation of phytohormones could result from the transport of phytohormones from damaged to undamaged parts of the plant or from the production of phytohormones directly in systemic tissues from precursors or conjugated forms, in response to a long-distance signal. Phytohormones are capable of long-distance transport [43], but they have propagation speeds that are slow in comparison with hydraulic and ESs [1][2][7], suggesting that hormones are not long-distance communicators in a rapid systemic response. The data on the rapid accumulation of some phytohormones in systemic tissues in response to local stimuli discussed in the previous section, taking into account the low speed of phytohormone transport, rather indicate the production of hormones directly in systemic tissues. Among the phytohormones, JAs display the fastest (within a few minutes) accumulation in the distal parts of the plant in response to local stimuli. Therefore, the stimulus-induced systemic accumulation of phytohormones is the result of de novo synthesis of these phytohormones in systemic tissues, and not of the transport from the stimulation zone. This suggests the existence of a rapid long-distance signal that is generated in response to the stimulus, propagates from the site of stimulation to distal tissues, and activates hormone production in these tissues.
ESs that propagate from the stimulation site to the distal parts of the plant are well suited for the role of rapid long-distance signals that induce the systemic change in the content of hormones under local stimuli [14][44][45]. The regulation of hormone production may be mediated by changes in Ca2+ and ROS levels and by pH shifts, which accompany the generation and the propagation of ESs [4][7][46].
Intensive research over the past two decades has identified important molecular components that may regulate JA metabolism under local stress. The largest amount of information was obtained in Ca2+-dependent regulation of JA metabolism. Changes in cytosolic Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]cyt) are provided by Ca2+ channels. Pretreating of the wounded leaf with the Ca2+ channel inhibitor La3+ blocked both the systemic [Ca2+]cyt increase and systemic induction of wound-related marker genes JASMONATE ZIM-domain (JAZ) 5, JAZ7 and 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid reductase (OPR) 3 [24], which are the primary response genes in the JA signaling pathway [14]. JA biosynthesis induced by heat-stimulated AP was suppressed by pretreatment with the Ca2+ channel blocker ruthenium red, which also suppressed the transient [Ca2+]cyt elevation that was associated with AP [47].
Specific Ca2+ channels involved in the regulation of production of JAs have only just begun to be defined. Ca2+ channel CYCLIC NUCLEOTIDE GATED CHANNEL 19 (CNGC19) is rapidly activated upon wounding, resulting in the increase in [Ca2+]cyt. CNGC19 is involved in the regulation of JA biosynthesis upon herbivory, as demonstrated by studies with mutants, in which loss of CNGC19 function resulted in both the decrease in stimulus-induced [Ca2+]cyt elevation and the decrease in accumulation of JA and JA-Ile [38]. Similar results on the role of CNGC19 were also obtained when exposed to the stimulus of a different nature, colonization by Piriformospora indica, a root endosymbiont [48], which indicates the universal role of CNGC19 in the regulation of JA production under various stimuli.
Another source of [Ca2+]cyt elevations in a plant cell and the potential regulator of JA production is annexins, plasma membrane-localized proteins, which can exhibit Ca2+ channel-like activity. ANNEXIN 1 (ANN1) is involved in the [Ca2+]cyt elevation in systemic leaves in response to local wounding, and also regulates the systemic increase in concentration of JAs. In ann1 loss-of-function plants, the stimulus-induced increase in [Ca2+]cyt was suppressed, and JA, JA-Ile and OPDA levels, increased in response to wounding, were significantly lower than in wild-type plants [25].
Cation channels of the GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR-LIKE (GLR) family are the important element in the generation and the propagation of VP and are involved in the [Ca2+]cyt elevations under the local stimulation [7]. GLR3.5-dependent electrical signaling is essential for JA biosynthesis upon root-knot nematode attack in tomato plants [49]. It was also shown that GLRs affect parameters of wound-induced VP and control the systemic wound-induced expression of several key JA-inducible regulators of JA signaling (JAZ genes) in arabidopsis plants [45]. GLR3.3 positively regulates the wound-induced accumulation of JA and JA-Ile in systemic tissues in arabidopsis plants, but is not involved in the production of JAs in local tissues [50], which is consistent with the role of GLR3.3 in the VP propagation to systemic tissues [24][45]. GLR1.2 and GLR1.3 are positive regulators of JA biosynthesis upon cold stress [51]. As seen, GLRs mediating [Ca2+]cyt elevation are universal positive regulators of JA production under various biotic and abiotic stresses, although one study also showed that GLR-mediated Ca2+ waves alone are insufficient to trigger JA signaling [52].
Another potential regulator of JA production that mediates [Ca2+]cyt elevations in a plant cell and is involved in systemic propagation of the Ca2+ signal is tonoplast-localized TWO-PORE CHANNEL 1 (TPC1) [7][53]. Arabidopsis gain-of-function fou2 (fatty acid oxygenation upregulated 2) mutant has the hyperactive version of TPC1 and increased JA and OPDA levels in resting leaves, which increase even more in wounded leaves [54][55].
Analyzing the mechanisms of the Ca2+-dependent regulation of JA biosynthesis, it can be noted that along with the increase in the JA and JA-Ile concentrations, there was an increase in the concentration of their precursor OPDA [25][48][54]; therefore, Ca2+ more likely affects the early steps of JA biosynthesis. This is consistent with the suggestion [44] that a Ca2+-dependent enzyme, which is involved in the early steps of the biosynthesis before OPDA (Box 2), participates in the rapid synthesis of JAs in systemic leaves upon local wounding. This enzyme is 13-lipoxygenase (LOX), which catalyzes the synthesis of JA precursors. For one of them, it is shown that LOX6 contributes to the rapid JA synthesis in systemic Arabidopsis leaves under the local wounding [22]. This appears to be a direct activation by Ca2+: LOX6 is predicted to have a β-barrel domain that may bind Ca2+ [44].
The initial steps of JA biosynthesis also involve phospholipases, whose activity may depend on [Ca2+]cyt. It is known that the increase in JA production after wounding can be mediated by changes in PLD activity: influx of Ca2+ induces the translocation of PLD to membrane, where it releases polyunsaturated fatty acids, which are necessary for the JA synthesis, from membrane phospholipids [56][57][58].
The role of the Ca2+ signaling system in the regulation of JA production is also evidenced by works on the involvement of Ca2+ sensors. The decoding of [Ca2+]cyt elevations is mediated by various Ca2+ sensors, including calmodulins (CaMs), calmodulin-like proteins (CMLs), calmodulin-binding proteins (CBPs), calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs), CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) and calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs).
The wound-induced [Ca2+]cyt elevation activates CaM, which in turn activates a protein kinase that phosphorylates JASMONATE-ASSOCIATED VQ-MOTIF 1 (JAV1). JAV1 is a part of the JAV1-JAZ8-WRKY51 repressor complex, which inhibits expression of JA biosynthesis genes. Phosphorylation of JAV1 causes dissociation of this complex, which removes transcriptional repression of JA biosynthesis genes and thus leads to production of JAs [59].
The Ca2+ sensor protein, CML37, functions as a positive regulator in Ca2+ signaling upon wounding by herbivore, connecting Ca2+ and JA signaling. The herbivore-induced JA-Ile and OPDA elevations decrease in CML37 loss-of-function plants [37]. Another Ca2+ sensor protein, CML42, does not affect the herbivore-induced and the wound-induced JA, JA-Ile and OPDA elevations [20]. A study of JA content in rice roots showed that OsCBL1 is a positive regulator of JA biosynthesis, as the JA content in OsCBL1-knockdown plants was decreased compared to the wild-type plants [60].
CDPKs are also involved in the regulation of stress-induced JA levels, as evidenced by the activation of CDPK2 in tobacco plants (Nicotiana benthamiana), which causes the increase in the JA and OPDA content. Transient expression of constitutively activated NtCDPK2 causes increased JA and OPDA production at rest, which increases under stress and exceeds the production in control plants [61]. Whereas CDPK2 positively regulates JA biosynthesis, CDPK4 and CDPK5 suppress JA biosynthesis [21][36]. It was found that simultaneously silencing Nicotiana attenuata NaCDPK4 and NaCDPK5 results in overaccumulation of JA and JA-Ile at rest and after wounding or simulated herbivory treatments [21]. The further investigation of the mechanisms by which NaCDPK4 and NaCDPK5 negatively control JA biosynthesis showed that OPDA concentration was also increased in mutants, but there were no differences in transcript levels of JA biosynthesis enzymes between mutants and the wild-type plants, suggesting that NaCDPK4 and NaCDPK5 have the role of regulators of the enzymatic activity in the early steps of JA biosynthesis [36].
Thus, the final target of Ca2+-dependent regulation of JA production may be both the expression of JA biosynthesis genes and the activity of JA biosynthesis enzymes, most likely in the early steps. The suggestion of Ca2+-dependent regulation of enzyme activity is consistent with the rapid stress-induced production of JAs, confirmed by much experimental data on different plant species and under various local stimuli (Section 2.1).
Another mechanism of JA biosynthesis induction may be pH changes, which, along with the Ca2+ wave, accompany ESs [4]. The shifts during the ES generation are most likely mediated by changes in the activity of H+-ATPase [4]. A recent study has shown that changes in H+-ATPase activity affect the content of JAs. The study was carried out in unstimulated leaves of Arabidopsis plants under local wounding and it showed that in mutant plants with reduced function of H+-ATPase (AHA1), there is the increased accumulation of JAs after wounding compared to the wild type [62]. Furthermore, loss of AHA1 function affects pH at rest, causing less medium acidification compared to the wild type [62], suggesting a role of H+-ATPase AHA1 in pH regulation. Therefore, the increasing JA production in mutant plants was apparently associated with pH shifts.
Along with Ca2+ and H+, other ions involved in the generation and the propagation of ES can also be considered as potential mediators of hormone responses. Stimulus-induced changes in the content of JAs can also be affected by anion fluxes due to the involvement of anion channels in the ES generation [6][7][8][44][63]. At present, there is evidence of the involvement of anion stretch-activated MscS (mechanosensitive channel of small conductance)-like (MSL) 10 in the systemic VP propagation in response to wounding in Arabidopsis [64][65]. The mutation of MSL10 reduces the duration of VP and the expression of JA pathway marker gene JAZ10 in distal leaves [65]. Another study using Arabidopsis plants carrying a gain-of-function mutation in MSL10 showed higher wound-induced JA and OPDA production in mutants than in wild-type plants [66]. Taken together, these findings suggest that anions could be potential mediators of ES-induced changes in concentration of JAs.
One of the integral elements of ES generation are K+ channels. However, whether K+ channels may be involved in stimulus-induced JA production is unclear. It is suggested that ARABIDOPSIS K+ TRANSPORTER 1 (AKT1) can play a role in the negative regulation of JA signaling by mediating K+ influx [67], but the role of AKT1 in ES is unclear to date. Other K+ channels, such as AKT2/3 and GUARD CELL OUTWARD RECTIFYING K+ (GORK), are involved in ES generation and propagation [7][44][68][69], and their roles in the control of JA production may need to be studied further.
Another potential mechanism of the regulation of JA biosynthesis may be changes in ROS levels. Evidence of the regulation of JA concentration by ROS can be seen in experimental data on the simulated induction of the increase in the content of JAs upon exogenous ROS treatment [49][70][71], as well as altered JA levels in mutant plants with loss of function of NADPH oxidase, a member of the respiratory burst oxidase homologs (RBOHs) family. Stimulus-induced increase in JA and OPDA concentrations in systemic Arabidopsis thaliana leaves was attenuated in rbohD mutants [27]. The stimulation of JA production in Arabidopsis thaliana [71] and Panax ginseng plants [70] required an increase in H2O2 concentration, dependent on the activity of NADPH oxidase. In Aquilaria sinensis plants, accumulation of JAs in response to wounding also required the increase in concentration of H2O2 [72]. RBOH1-dependent ROS production is essential for JA biosynthesis regulation in Solanum lycopersicum in response to nematode attack [49].
Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) are other candidates for the role of JA biosynthesis regulators, which are rapidly activated in response to wounding in both local and systemic tissues, and it is assumed that this activation is mediated by ESs [73]. Two MAPKs in Nicotiana tabacum, WOUND-INDUCED PROTEIN KINASE (WIPK/MAPK3) and SA-INDUCED PROTEIN KINASE (SIPK/MAPK6), are activated in response to wounding, which subsequently leads to the increase in the JA synthesis [74][75][76]. The kinase activity of WIPK in local tissues increased 3 min after wounding, peaked at 5 min and declined to the basal level at 30 min. In systemic tissues, the WIPK activity also increased at 3 min, reached a maximum at 10 min time point and declined to the basal level at 30 min [75]. These dynamics of WIPK activity are consistent with the dynamics of JAs described in Section 2.1, which suggests the role of WIPK in the rapid induction of JA biosynthesis. In another work, silencing genes encoding WIPK and SIPK in Nicotiana attenuata inhibits JA and JA-Ile biosynthesis induced by simulated herbivory or mechanical wounding [10]. Another MAPK in Nicotiana attenuata, MPK4, acts as a negative regulator of JA synthesis upon simulated attack of Manduca sexta, but does not affect JA levels upon wounding or the simulated attack of Spodoptera littoralis [73], which may be the mechanism for the specificity of hormone dynamics, described in Section 2.1.1. In rice, herbivore attack activates MPK3, which positively regulates JA accumulation [77]. In Solanum lycopersicum, the induction of JA synthesis in response to nematode attack was mediated by MPK1/2, the activation of which depends on interdependent electrical and ROS signals [49]. The specific mechanism of regulation of JA biosynthesis by MAPKs is still unknown. It is assumed that SIPK regulates the lipase, which releases linolenic acid from the chloroplast membrane, and WIPK probably affects the activity of allene oxide synthase [17][73]. Taken together, these studies indicate that the ES-mediated activation of MAPKs is involved in the regulation of JA biosynthesis and is part of initial plant reaction to mechanical wounding and herbivore attack.
The regulation of JA biosynthesis also may be mediated by crosstalk of key signaling elements, involved in electrical activity. As discussed above, the induction of JA biosynthesis may be caused by pH shifts, which accompany the generation of ESs and depend on the H+-ATPase activity. In turn, the activity of H+-ATPase can be Ca2+-dependent [78][79] and regulated by CDPK [80], which is also confirmed by the associated transient changes in pH and Ca2+ concentration in cytosol in response to wounding [81]. On the other hand, pH shifts may affect [Ca2+]cyt: GLRs are regulated by pH [82]. Interdependence of MSL10 and GLRs in distal wound signaling [65] also supports the hypothesis of crosstalk-mediated regulation of JA biosynthesis, in this case mediated by the crosstalk of anion fluxes and Ca2+-waves. The Ca2+-dependent regulation of another key signaling element, RBOH, mediated the ROS wave, is also well known in the literature [2]. In turn, the activity of Ca2+ channels can be regulated by ROS [83][84]. ROS can also activate a MAPK phosphorylation cascade, which can form a positive amplification loop with ROS [85].
Mechanisms of regulation of the stress-induced increase in ABA content by ESs are not sufficiently studied; nevertheless, several potential ways can be assumed. First of all, the involvement of Ca2+, ubiquitous signaling agents, can link ABA production and ESs, although it is known that loss of CNGC19 function and the resulting attenuated stimulus-induced [Ca2+]cyt elevation do not affect ABA content [48]. However, this role can be played by other Ca2+ channels that have not been identified to date. It can be suggested that there are mechanisms regulating ABA content through various Ca2+-binding proteins. It is shown for CBL9 that it can modulate ABA biosynthesis under abiotic stress. The disruption of CBL9 gene function in Arabidopsis thaliana leads to increased accumulation of ABA under the stress conditions compared to the wild type. Furthermore, expression of CBL9 was inducible by ABA, thereby representing a crosstalk node in connecting ABA signaling and ABA biosynthesis under stress conditions [86]. Another Ca2+-binding protein, CML42, also negatively affects ABA biosynthesis under drought, since it was observed that ABA levels were higher in cml42 mutants than in wild-type plants [20]. Taken together, these data suggest that Ca2+ may play a negative role in the regulation of ABA production and that its function is mediated by various Ca2+-binding proteins.
The regulation of the biosynthetic gene expression through a Ca2+-dependent phosphorylation cascade, which is activated in response to abiotic stresses, is also suggested for ABA, and ABA feedback can stimulate the expression of the biosynthetic genes also through the Ca2+-dependent phosphorylation cascade [87]. On the whole, for many phytohormones, a positive feedback loop involving Ca2+ and ROS is assumed, and an increase in biosynthesis [85].
Taking into account the close relationship between Ca2+ and ROS [84], ROS can be assumed to be a regulator of ABA levels. It is shown in Arabidopsis thaliana that the rapid (10 min) transient increase in ABA content in systemic tissues in response to local heat stress was suppressed in rbohD mutants [29]. It also showed that both ROS wave and ESs were suppressed in rbohD mutants [29]. Taken together, this suggests that ESs and ROS waves could function cooperatively to control ABA production.
The ABA content in plants also can be potentially regulated by pH. It is known that dehydration stress causes an increase in apoplastic pH and ABA concentration, which were completely eliminated after pretreatment with fusicoccin, activating H+ extrusion and thereby contributing to apoplast acidification [88]. This increase in ABA concentration may be implemented by hydrolysis of ABA precursors in response to the increase in apoplast pH under stress conditions [89][90].
A potential point of controlling ABA content by pH may be the regulation of transport processes of ABA conjugates, whose deconjugation enzymes are separated by cellular compartments. ABA can be produced by deconjugation of the ABA glucosyl ester (ABA-GE), which is a storage or transport form of ABA and accumulated in the vacuole, apoplast and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) [91]. Deconjugation of ABA-GE by ER and vacuolar β-glucosidases allows a rapid formation of the free ABA in response to abiotic stress conditions such as dehydration and salt stress. Deconjugation of ABA-GE may be important in rapid stress reactions, as the free ABA is generated in a one-step hydrolysis reaction. This reaction occurs in vacuoles or ER; therefore, it requires the import of ABA-GE into these compartments. The import of ABA-GE into vacuoles is mediated by two distinct membrane transport mechanisms: proton-dependent antiport mechanism and ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters [92]. The effect of orthovanadate, ABC transporter inhibitor, on vacuolar ABA-GE import by AtABCC2 showed the decrease in ABA-GE uptake [92], which presumably may also affect the decrease in free ABA concentration.
The regulatory role of pH may be realized by changing the expression of ABA biosynthesis genes. It is shown that changes in intracellular pH are sufficient to modulate the expression of ABA biosynthesis genes and ABA accumulation [93]. Pretreatment of plants with chemical agents that change cytosolic pH affects ABA concentration both at rest and under osmotic stress.
Anion and K+ fluxes during ES generation can probably also mediate stimulus-induced ABA production. ES generation in higher plants is accompanied by anion and K+ efflux with significant and prolonged changes in the intra- and extracellular concentrations of these ions [6], which can lead to changes in the turgor of plant cells. It was also demonstrated that ABA biosynthesis is triggered by a reduction in leaf turgor. Moreover, an increase in ABA levels was observed over a short timeframe following leaf exposure to high vapor pressure deficit, a method of modifying leaf cell turgor by the application of external pressure [94][95][96].
Mechanisms of regulation of SA biosynthesis by ESs can also be proposed. As in the case of ABA, loss of CNGC19 function and the resulting attenuated stimulus-induced [Ca2+]cyt elevation do not affect SA content [38][48]. Nevertheless, some Ca2+-dependent mechanisms of SA content regulation can be suggested, since Ca2+ influx into the cell may be mediated by other Ca2+ channels involved in long-distance signaling [2][7]. There are several Ca2+-dependent proteins involved in the regulation of SA biosynthesis. In Arabidopsis, CDPK1 overexpression results in enhanced resistance to bacterial and fungal pathogens, which coincides with constitutively high levels of SA, and correspondingly increased expression of SA biosynthesis genes [97]. In transgenic Arabidopsis with CDPK5 overexpression, enhanced resistance against bacterial infection is dependent on high SA levels, and plants display constitutive SA signaling [97][98]. In Nicotiana attenuata, CDPK4 and CDPK5 are not involved in the regulation of SA biosynthesis: simultaneously silencing NaCDPK4 and NaCDPK5 does not affect SA levels at rest or after damage, induced by wounding or herbivore [21]. Another Ca2+ sensor protein, CML42, does not affect SA levels at rest or under herbivore attack [20]. Positive regulation of SA biosynthesis by Ca2+ may be realized through CBP60g, whose activity is modulated by Ca2+/CaM at the post-transcriptional level [98].
Another potential regulator of SA biosynthesis may be the change in the activity of MAPKs. In tobacco plants, MAPKs WIPK and SIPK regulate SA levels upon wounding. In WIPK/SIPK-silenced plants, wounding induces increased SA accumulation compared to the wild type [74][76]. In another study, silencing genes encoding WIPK and SIPK in Nicotiana attenuata inhibits SA biosynthesis induced by simulated herbivory or mechanical wounding [10]. In rice plants, silencing OsMPK3 does not affect basal and herbivore-induced SA levels [77]. Taken together, the studies described above show a complex and contradictory picture of possible regulation of SA production by ESs. Along with examples of positive regulation, there is a lot of evidence of the negative regulation of SA biosynthesis or no effect on SA content. It is possible that there is interplay between various hormones, which also affects the production of phytohormones.
Thus, mechanisms of regulation of changes in phytohormone content by ESs can potentially be mediated by changes in Ca2+, H+ and ROS concentrations, which accompany the generation and propagation of ESs. For some mechanisms, their involvement can be considered an established fact, but for most, confirmation is required.

3. The Role of Electrical Signals and Phytohormones in the Formation of a Systemic Response

A systemic response to various local stimuli requires coordinated transmission of signals throughout the plant, among which electrical and chemical signals play a significant role. It is well-known that the spectrum of functional responses induced by such signals necessary for plant survival and adaptation is extremely diverse and includes movements, changes in photosynthesis activity, changes in transpiration and respiration rates, induction of gene expression, etc. [6][8][99]. The time range in which systemic responses induced by long-distance signals occur is very wide—from several seconds, such as movement reactions when a Dionaea muscipula trap closes [100], to a day or more, as in the case of changes in the rate of growth and development [101]. In most cases, the formation of a systemic response to local stimuli occurs within minutes and hours, such as changes in the activity of photosynthesis, transpiration, the level of metabolites and digestive enzymes in carnivorous plants [27][29][102][103][104]. It should be noted that the temporal dynamics of the systemic response are quite complex; in some cases, the systemic response clearly distinguishes between short-term and long-term phases of the response, such as for changes in photosynthesis activity [30][34][105][106], stomatal conductance [30][107][108] and ATP content [109]. However, despite the fact that the mechanisms of systemic response formation and the contribution of signals of different nature to the induction of each of the response phases remain poorly understood, the main features of this process can be distinguished.
Since the development of a systemic response begins almost immediately after the arrival of a long-distance signal to the unstimulated parts of the plant, among which, as noted above, ESs are among the most rapid, it can be assumed that these signals are responsible for the induction of the fast phase of the response [1][2][6]. It is known that the mechanisms of the induction of systemic response by ESs are based on changes in ionic concentrations that take place during their generation [6][8]. A special role belongs to Ca2+ and H+, the concentration of which increases in the cell both during AP and VP, and which are important mediators [1][2][6][8][42][44], capable of performing the so-called physiological regulation that directly affects physiological processes. It should also be noted that the VP propagation is associated with an increase in the levels of H2O2, which is a ubiquitous signaling agent [1][2][6][42][44].
The mechanisms of induction of a systemic response by an electrical signal can be analyzed using the example of the response of photosynthesis, as these responses are the most studied. The ES propagation causes a transient decrease in the activity of photosynthesis, manifested as a decrease in the rate of CO2 assimilation [102][106][110][111][112], and in changes in the parameters of the light reactions of photosynthesis—a decrease in the quantum yield of photosystem II, an increase in non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) [30][34][102][106][113]. The fast response phase, which usually proceeds no more than ten minutes, starts almost immediately after the occurrence of ES, and the lag period usually does not exceed several tens of seconds [105][110][111][113][114]. A considerable role in the rapid decrease in the activity of photosynthesis belongs to the pH changes occurring during the generation of ES [106][110][111][115], which lead to the inactivation of the Calvin–Benson cycle [5][116], the increase in NPQ [117] and reduced availability of CO2 for chloroplasts by changing the CO2:HCO3 ratio [115][118] or activity of aquaporins [110].
As mentioned earlier, the photosynthesis response includes two phases [30][34][105]. Changes in ionic concentrations during ES are responsible for the induction of the first short-term phase, and the second long-term phase is, apparently, regulated by hormones. Moreover, this effect is primarily due to a decrease in the availability of CO2 due to the closure of stomata [119]. Suppression of the rate of CO2 assimilation has been demonstrated with an increase in the level of JA [31][120][121] and ABA [31][120][122], but there are data on the effect of ABA on the light parameters of photosynthesis [119][122]. Note that the duration of changes in photosynthesis activity caused by hormones such as JAs can be up to several days [119][121]. As signaling molecules, hormones are able to directly regulate the activity of key physiological processes, both by changing the activity of enzymes, transporters, etc. [123][124], i.e., through physiological regulation, and by changing the level of gene expression.
The mechanisms of regulation of physiological processes by hormones are well studied in relation to the functioning of the stomatal apparatus. In general, the mechanism of stomatal closure is a decrease in the turgor of guard cells due to a decrease in osmotic pressure. This is mainly due to the efflux of K+, Cl− and malate ions from the cell, in some cases with the participation of H+ and Ca2+ acting as inducers of these ion fluxes [125][126]. The mechanisms of action are best studied for ABA [27][32][108][120][122][127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134] and JAs, including JA [31][32][120][121][132][135][136][137][138], JA-Ile [139] and methyl jasmonate (MeJA) [130][134][135][140][141][142], including their precursor OPDA [133][139]. The process of JA- [130] and ABA-induced [27][122][129][130][143] stomatal closure is largely similar and includes activation of NADPH oxidase, presumably RBOHD and RBOHF [27][129], which produces ROS. ROS, in turn, activate the Ca2+ channels of guard cells [130][131][143]. The increase in [Ca2+]cyt induced by channel opening leads to the activation of S-type anion channels [130][144], presumably SLOW ANION CHANNEL-ASSOCIATED 1 (SLAC1) in the case of ABA [27][144][145], and K+ channels (presumably GUARD CELL OUTWARD RECTIFYING K+ channel (GORK)) in the case of JA [137] and MeJA [134][142], which directly lead to the closure of the stomata. Of note, taking into account the available data, there is a direct crossing of the mechanisms or interaction between JA and ABA at the level between the production of ROS and the activation of Ca2+ channels [130][137][140][146].
However, it should be noted that the presented mechanism is not the only one. There are a number of works suggesting NO produced by H2O2-activated nitrate reductases as a key activator of Ca2+ channels causing ABA-dependent stomatal closure [127][130][147]. Moreover, an alternative, Ca2+-independent mechanism of stomatal closure has been suggested for ABA [134][148].
In the case of SA, which is also shown to be involved in stomatal closure [108][149][150][151], the induction mechanism is somewhat different—the main role is played by salicylhydroxamic acid (SHAM)-sensitive peroxidases [107][108][150], which produce ROS (H2O2 and O2−) in response to SA, whereas NADPH oxidases are not involved in this process [27]. Probably, this process also involves ROS- [107] or Ca2+-dependent production of NO [152]. Compared to the mechanisms induced by JAs and ABA, in SA-induced stomatal closure, Ca2+ channels are not directly involved, and stomatal closure occurs through the suppression of extracellular Ca2+ binding and the suppression of the activity of K+ channels [107][151]. Despite the noted differences in the mechanisms of stomatal closure with the participation of various hormones, one can distinguish universal features of the process, which include the determining role of ROS [27][107][147] and changes in ionic concentrations, primarily of Ca2+ [130][131].
Along with inducing a response by altering the activity of enzymes and transporters, hormones can induce long-term changes by regulating gene expression. Continuing to consider the formation of a systemic response using the example of photosynthesis, one can note that a significant number of genes associated with it are controlled, in particular, by JAs [153]. Thus, it has been shown that MeJA suppresses the expression of genes responsible for the synthesis of chlorophyll [119][153][154], the functioning of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RUBISCO) [119][153] and the formation of photosystems with light harvesting complexes [119][154] and electron transport systems [121]. The noted processes can lead to long-term suppression of photosynthesis activity in unstimulated parts of the plant. Thus, it can be concluded that the long-term phase of the response may be associated with a change in the content of hormones. It should be noted that gene expression leading to long-term changes in the physiological state can also be triggered directly by ESs, presumably through changes in [Ca2+]cyt [104][155][156] or inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate [104].
Considering the systemic response induced by hormones, it is necessary to note the specificity of the changes caused by them. In particular, this is due to the specific profile of gene expression in relation to certain hormones. Thus, JAs are well known as inducers of a defensive response, activating defense genes specific for attacks by various herbivores or pathogens [119][157][158], which is confirmed by the inhibition of growth of insects and pathogens that feed on plants with increased JA production [159].
The SA regulates the expression of various protective genes, primarily those responsible for the redox balance [160][161][162], which occurs not only upon pathogen attacks, but also probably during local heat and light stimuli [28][161][163].
The ABA is characterized primarily by an increase in the expression of genes responsible for drought resistance [91][123]. ABA-induced systemic responses are controlled, among other things, by the expression of genes of such important elements of signaling cascades as NADPH oxidase [129] and ascorbate peroxidase 2 (APX2), probably through the mediation of ROS [164], and expression of other genes under local stimuli such as high light [29][122][164].
It is important to mention the interaction of hormones for the induction of the expression of a number of genes, such as ABA-dependent induction of proteinase inhibitor 2 (PIN2) gene expression during wounding, which includes the involvement of JA [132]. It should be noted that the activation of many JA-inducible genes upon stress requires ABA production upstream of JA [140][165]. SA can act antagonistically towards JA in the regulation of gene expression [166][167]. The interaction of hormones also includes the fact that OPDA, apparently, also has a separate, ABA-independent mechanism of regulating stomatal closure [133].

References

  1. Huber, A.E.; Bauerle, T.L. Long-Distance Plant Signaling Pathways in Response to Multiple Stressors: The Gap in Knowledge. EXBOTJ 2016, 67, 2063–2079.
  2. Choi, W.-G.; Hilleary, R.; Swanson, S.J.; Kim, S.-H.; Gilroy, S. Rapid, Long-Distance Electrical and Calcium Signaling in Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2016, 67, 287–307.
  3. Farmer, E.E.; Gasperini, D.; Acosta, I.F. The Squeeze Cell Hypothesis for the Activation of Jasmonate Synthesis in Response to Wounding. New Phytol. 2014, 204, 282–288.
  4. Vodeneev, V.A.; Katicheva, L.A.; Sukhov, V.S. Electrical Signals in Higher Plants: Mechanisms of Generation and Propagation. Biophysics 2016, 61, 505–512.
  5. Szechyńska-Hebda, M.; Lewandowska, M.; Karpiński, S. Electrical Signaling, Photosynthesis and Systemic Acquired Acclimation. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 684.
  6. Sukhov, V.; Sukhova, E.; Vodeneev, V. Long-Distance Electrical Signals as a Link between the Local Action of Stressors and the Systemic Physiological Responses in Higher Plants. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2019, 146, 63–84.
  7. Johns, S.; Hagihara, T.; Toyota, M.; Gilroy, S. The Fast and the Furious: Rapid Long-Range Signaling in Plants. Plant Physiol. 2021, 185, 694–706.
  8. Klejchova, M.; Silva-Alvim, F.A.L.; Blatt, M.R.; Alvim, J.C. Membrane Voltage as a Dynamic Platform for Spatiotemporal Signaling, Physiological, and Developmental Regulation. Plant Physiol. 2021, 185, 1523–1541.
  9. Herde, O.; Peña-Cortés, H.; Wasternack, C.; Willmitzer, L.; Fisahn, J. Electric Signaling and Pin2 Gene Expression on Different Abiotic Stimuli Depend on a Distinct Threshold Level of Endogenous Abscisic Acid in Several Abscisic Acid-Deficient Tomato Mutants1. Plant Physiol. 1999, 119, 213–218.
  10. Wu, J.; Hettenhausen, C.; Meldau, S.; Baldwin, I.T. Herbivory Rapidly Activates MAPK Signaling in Attacked and Unattacked Leaf Regions but Not between Leaves of Nicotiana attenuata. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 1096–1122.
  11. Glauser, G.; Grata, E.; Dubugnon, L.; Rudaz, S.; Farmer, E.E.; Wolfender, J.-L. Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Jasmonate Synthesis and Accumulation in Arabidopsis in Response to Wounding. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 16400–16407.
  12. Pan, X.; Welti, R.; Wang, X. Simultaneous Quantification of Major Phytohormones and Related Compounds in Crude Plant Extracts by Liquid Chromatography–Electrospray Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Phytochemistry 2008, 69, 1773–1781.
  13. Suza, W.P.; Staswick, P.E. The Role of JAR1 in Jasmonoyl-l-Isoleucine Production during Arabidopsis Wound Response. Planta 2008, 227, 1221–1232.
  14. Koo, A.J.K.; Gao, X.; Daniel Jones, A.; Howe, G.A. A Rapid Wound Signal Activates the Systemic Synthesis of Bioactive Jasmonates in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2009, 59, 974–986.
  15. Miller, G.; Schlauch, K.; Tam, R.; Cortes, D.; Torres, M.A.; Shulaev, V.; Dangl, J.L.; Mittler, R. The Plant NADPH Oxidase RBOHD Mediates Rapid Systemic Signaling in Response to Diverse Stimuli. Sci. Signal. 2009, 2, ra45.
  16. Sato, C.; Seto, Y.; Nabeta, K.; Matsuura, H. Kinetics of the Accumulation of Jasmonic Acid and Its Derivatives in Systemic Leaves of Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum Cv. Xanthi Nc) and Translocation of Deuterium-Labeled Jasmonic Acid from the Wounding Site to the Systemic Site. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2009, 73, 1962–1970.
  17. Kallenbach, M.; Alagna, F.; Baldwin, I.T.; Bonaventure, G. Nicotiana attenuata SIPK, WIPK, NPR1, and Fatty Acid-Amino Acid Conjugates Participate in the Induction of Jasmonic Acid Biosynthesis by Affecting Early Enzymatic Steps in the Pathway. Plant Physiol. 2009, 152, 96–106.
  18. Sato, C.; Aikawa, K.; Sugiyama, S.; Nabeta, K.; Masuta, C.; Matsuura, H. Distal Transport of Exogenously Applied Jasmonoyl–Isoleucine with Wounding Stress. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52, 509–517.
  19. Matsuura, H.; Takeishi, S.; Kiatoka, N.; Sato, C.; Sueda, K.; Masuta, C.; Nabeta, K. Transportation of de Novo Synthesized Jasmonoyl Isoleucine in Tomato. Phytochemistry 2012, 83, 25–33.
  20. Vadassery, J.; Reichelt, M.; Hause, B.; Gershenzon, J.; Boland, W.; Mithöfer, A. CML42-Mediated Calcium Signaling Coordinates Responses to Spodoptera Herbivory and Abiotic Stresses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159, 1159–1175.
  21. Yang, D.-H.; Hettenhausen, C.; Baldwin, I.T.; Wu, J. Silencing Nicotiana attenuata Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinases, CDPK4 and CDPK5, Strongly Up-Regulates Wound- and Herbivory-Induced Jasmonic Acid Accumulations. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159, 1591–1607.
  22. Chauvin, A.; Caldelari, D.; Wolfender, J.-L.; Farmer, E.E. Four 13-Lipoxygenases Contribute to Rapid Jasmonate Synthesis in Wounded Arabidopsis thaliana Leaves: A Role for Lipoxygenase 6 in Responses to Long-Distance Wound Signals. New Phytol. 2013, 197, 566–575.
  23. Heyer, M.; Reichelt, M.; Mithöfer, A. A Holistic Approach to Analyze Systemic Jasmonate Accumulation in Individual Leaves of Arabidopsis Rosettes Upon Wounding. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1569.
  24. Toyota, M.; Spencer, D.; Sawai-Toyota, S.; Jiaqi, W.; Zhang, T.; Koo, A.J.; Howe, G.A.; Gilroy, S. Glutamate Triggers Long-Distance, Calcium-Based Plant Defense Signaling. Science 2018, 361, 1112–1115.
  25. Malabarba, J.; Meents, A.K.; Reichelt, M.; Scholz, S.S.; Peiter, E.; Rachowka, J.; Konopka-Postupolska, D.; Wilkins, K.A.; Davies, J.M.; Oelmüller, R.; et al. ANNEXIN1 Mediates Calcium-dependent Systemic Defense in Arabidopsis Plants upon Herbivory and Wounding. New Phytol. 2021, 231, 243–254.
  26. Zhang, C.; Žukauskaitė, A.; Petřík, I.; Pěnčík, A.; Hönig, M.; Grúz, J.; Široká, J.; Novák, O.; Doležal, K. In Situ Characterisation of Phytohormones from Wounded Arabidopsis Leaves Using Desorption Electrospray Ionisation Mass Spectrometry Imaging. Analyst 2021, 146, 2653–2663.
  27. Devireddy, A.R.; Zandalinas, S.I.; Gómez-Cadenas, A.; Blumwald, E.; Mittler, R. Coordinating the Overall Stomatal Response of Plants: Rapid Leaf-to-Leaf Communication during Light Stress. Sci. Signal. 2018, 11, eaam9514.
  28. Zandalinas, S.I.; Fichman, Y.; Devireddy, A.R.; Sengupta, S.; Azad, R.K.; Mittler, R. Systemic Signaling during Abiotic Stress Combination in Plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 13810–13820.
  29. Suzuki, N.; Miller, G.; Salazar, C.; Mondal, H.A.; Shulaev, E.; Cortes, D.F.; Shuman, J.L.; Luo, X.; Shah, J.; Schlauch, K.; et al. Temporal-Spatial Interaction between Reactive Oxygen Species and Abscisic Acid Regulates Rapid Systemic Acclimation in Plants. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 3553–3569.
  30. Mudrilov, M.; Ladeynova, M.; Berezina, E.; Grinberg, M.; Brilkina, A.; Sukhov, V.; Vodeneev, V. Mechanisms of Specific Systemic Response in Wheat Plants under Different Locally Acting Heat Stimuli. J. Plant Physiol. 2021, 258–259, 153377.
  31. Hlaváčková, V.; Krchňák, P.; Nauš, J.; Novák, O.; Špundová, M.; Strnad, M. Electrical and Chemical Signals Involved in Short-Term Systemic Photosynthetic Responses of Tobacco Plants to Local Burning. Planta 2006, 225, 235–244.
  32. Hlavinka, J.; Nožková-Hlaváčková, V.; Floková, K.; Novák, O.; Nauš, J. Jasmonic Acid Accumulation and Systemic Photosynthetic and Electrical Changes in Locally Burned Wild Type Tomato, ABA-Deficient Sitiens Mutants and Sitiens Pre-Treated by ABA. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 54, 89–96.
  33. Paulmann, M.K.; Kunert, G.; Zimmermann, M.R.; Theis, N.; Ludwig, A.; Meichsner, D.; Oelmüller, R.; Gershenzon, J.; Habekuss, A.; Ordon, F.; et al. Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus Infection Leads to Higher Chemical Defense Signals and Lower Electrophysiological Reactions in Susceptible Compared to Tolerant Barley Genotypes. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 145.
  34. Ladeynova, M.; Mudrilov, M.; Berezina, E.; Kior, D.; Grinberg, M.; Brilkina, A.; Sukhov, V.; Vodeneev, V. Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Electrical and Photosynthetic Activity and the Content of Phytohormones Induced by Local Stimulation of Pea Plants. Plants 2020, 9, 1364.
  35. Wang, L.; Allmann, S.; Wu, J.; Baldwin, I.T. Comparisons of LIPOXYGENASE3- and JASMONATE-RESISTANT4/6-Silenced Plants Reveal That Jasmonic Acid and Jasmonic Acid-Amino Acid Conjugates Play Different Roles in Herbivore Resistance of Nicotiana attenuata. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146, 904–915.
  36. Hettenhausen, C.; Yang, D.-H.; Baldwin, I.T.; Wu, J. Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinases, CDPK4 and CDPK5, Affect Early Steps of Jasmonic Acid Biosynthesis in Nicotiana attenuata. Plant Signal. Behav. 2013, 8, e22784.
  37. Scholz, S.S.; Vadassery, J.; Heyer, M.; Reichelt, M.; Bender, K.W.; Snedden, W.A.; Boland, W.; Mithöfer, A. Mutation of the Arabidopsis Calmodulin-Like Protein CML37 Deregulates the Jasmonate Pathway and Enhances Susceptibility to Herbivory. Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 1712–1726.
  38. Meena, M.K.; Prajapati, R.; Krishna, D.; Divakaran, K.; Pandey, Y.; Reichelt, M.; Mathew, M.K.; Boland, W.; Mithöfer, A.; Vadassery, J. The Ca2+ Channel CNGC19 Regulates Arabidopsis Defense Against Spodoptera Herbivory. Plant Cell 2019, 31, 1539–1562.
  39. Thornburg, R.W.; Li, X. Wounding Nicotiana tabacum Leaves Causes a Decline in Endogenous Indole-3-Acetic Acid. Plant Physiol. 1991, 96, 802–805.
  40. Wasternack, C.; Hause, B. Jasmonates: Biosynthesis, Perception, Signal Transduction and Action in Plant Stress Response, Growth and Development. An Update to the 2007 Review in Annals of Botany. Ann. Bot. 2013, 111, 1021–1058.
  41. Vadassery, J.; Reichelt, M.; Jimenez-Aleman, G.H.; Boland, W.; Mithöfer, A. Neomycin Inhibition of (+)-7-Iso-Jasmonoyl-L-Isoleucine Accumulation and Signaling. J. Chem Ecol. 2014, 40, 676–686.
  42. Mudrilov, M.; Ladeynova, M.; Grinberg, M.; Balalaeva, I.; Vodeneev, V. Electrical Signaling of Plants under Abiotic Stressors: Transmission of Stimulus-Specific Information. IJMS 2021, 22, 10715.
  43. Shabala, S.; White, R.G.; Djordjevic, M.A.; Ruan, Y.-L.; Mathesius, U. Root-to-Shoot Signalling: Integration of Diverse Molecules, Pathways and Functions. Funct. Plant Biol. 2016, 43, 87.
  44. Farmer, E.E.; Gao, Y.; Lenzoni, G.; Wolfender, J.; Wu, Q. Wound- and Mechanostimulated Electrical Signals Control Hormone Responses. New Phytol. 2020, 227, 1037–1050.
  45. Mousavi, S.A.R.; Chauvin, A.; Pascaud, F.; Kellenberger, S.; Farmer, E.E. GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR-LIKE Genes Mediate Leaf-to-Leaf Wound Signalling. Nature 2013, 500, 422–426.
  46. Peláez-Vico, M.Á.; Fichman, Y.; Zandalinas, S.I.; Van Breusegem, F.; Karpiński, S.M.; Mittler, R. ROS and Redox Regulation of Cell-to-Cell and Systemic Signaling in Plants during Stress. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2022, 193, 354–362.
  47. Fisahn, J.; Herde, O.; Willmitzer, L.; Peña-Cortés, H. Analysis of the Transient Increase in Cytosolic Ca2+ during the Action Potential of Higher Plants with High Temporal Resolution: Requirement of Ca2+ Transients for Induction of Jasmonic Acid Biosynthesis and PINII Gene Expression. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004, 45, 456–459.
  48. Jogawat, A.; Meena, M.K.; Kundu, A.; Varma, M.; Vadassery, J. Calcium Channel CNGC19 Mediates Basal Defense Signaling to Regulate Colonization by Piriformospora indica in Arabidopsis Roots. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 2752–2768.
  49. Wang, G.; Hu, C.; Zhou, J.; Liu, Y.; Cai, J.; Pan, C.; Wang, Y.; Wu, X.; Shi, K.; Xia, X.; et al. Systemic Root-Shoot Signaling Drives Jasmonate-Based Root Defense against Nematodes. Curr. Biol. 2019, 29, 3430–3438.e4.
  50. Li, M.; Wang, F.; Li, S.; Yu, G.; Wang, L.; Li, Q.; Zhu, X.; Li, Z.; Yuan, L.; Liu, P. Importers Drive Leaf-to-Leaf Jasmonic Acid Transmission in Wound-Induced Systemic Immunity. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1485–1498.
  51. Zheng, Y.; Luo, L.; Wei, J.; Chen, Q.; Yang, Y.; Hu, X.; Kong, X. The Glutamate Receptors AtGLR1.2 and AtGLR1.3 Increase Cold Tolerance by Regulating Jasmonate Signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 506, 895–900.
  52. Bellandi, A.; Papp, D.; Breakspear, A.; Joyce, J.; Johnston, M.G.; de Keijzer, J.; Raven, E.C.; Ohtsu, M.; Vincent, T.R.; Miller, A.J.; et al. Diffusion and Bulk Flow of Amino Acids Mediate Calcium Waves in Plants. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eabo6693.
  53. Choi, W.; Miller, G.; Wallace, I.; Harper, J.; Mittler, R.; Gilroy, S. Orchestrating Rapid Long-distance Signaling in Plants with Ca2+, ROS and Electrical Signals. Plant J. 2017, 90, 698–707.
  54. Bonaventure, G.; Gfeller, A.; Proebsting, W.M.; Hörtensteiner, S.; Chételat, A.; Martinoia, E.; Farmer, E.E. A Gain-of-Function Allele of TPC1 Activates Oxylipin Biogenesis after Leaf Wounding in Arabidopsis: A Cation Channel Regulates Oxylipin Biogenesis. Plant J. 2007, 49, 889–898.
  55. Lenglet, A.; Jaślan, D.; Toyota, M.; Mueller, M.; Müller, T.; Schönknecht, G.; Marten, I.; Gilroy, S.; Hedrich, R.; Farmer, E.E. Control of Basal Jasmonate Signalling and Defence through Modulation of Intracellular Cation Flux Capacity. New Phytol. 2017, 216, 1161–1169.
  56. Ryu, S.B.; Wang, X. Activation of Phospholipase D and the Possible Mechanism of Activation in Wound-Induced Lipid Hydrolysis in Castor Bean Leaves. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta (BBA)—Lipids Lipid Metab. 1996, 1303, 243–250.
  57. Wang, C.; Zien, C.A.; Afitlhile, M.; Welti, R.; Hildebrand, D.F.; Wang, X. Involvement of Phospholipase D in Wound-Induced Accumulation of Jasmonic Acid in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 2237–2246.
  58. Hunter, K.; Kimura, S.; Rokka, A.; Tran, H.C.; Toyota, M.; Kukkonen, J.P.; Wrzaczek, M. CRK2 Enhances Salt Tolerance by Regulating Callose Deposition in Connection with PLDα1. Plant Physiol. 2019, 180, 2004–2021.
  59. Yan, C.; Fan, M.; Yang, M.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, W.; Su, Y.; Xiao, L.; Deng, H.; Xie, D. Injury Activates Ca2+/Calmodulin-Dependent Phosphorylation of JAV1-JAZ8-WRKY51 Complex for Jasmonate Biosynthesis. Mol. Cell 2018, 70, 136–149.e7.
  60. Yang, J.; Zhang, X.; Huang, Y.; Feng, Y.; Li, Y. OsCBL1 Modulates Lateral Root Elongation in Rice via Affecting Endogenous Indole-3-Acetic Acid Biosynthesis. J. Genet. Genom. 2015, 42, 331–334.
  61. Ludwig, A.A.; Saitoh, H.; Felix, G.; Freymark, G.; Miersch, O.; Wasternack, C.; Boller, T.; Jones, J.D.G.; Romeis, T. Ethylene-Mediated Cross-Talk between Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinase and MAPK Signaling Controls Stress Responses in Plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 10736–10741.
  62. Kumari, A.; Chételat, A.; Nguyen, C.T.; Farmer, E.E. Arabidopsis H+-ATPase AHA1 Controls Slow Wave Potential Duration and Wound-Response Jasmonate Pathway Activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 20226–20231.
  63. Lee, K.; Seo, P.J. Wound-Induced Systemic Responses and Their Coordination by Electrical Signals. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 880680.
  64. Basu, D.; Haswell, E.S. The Mechanosensitive Ion Channel MSL10 Potentiates Responses to Cell Swelling in Arabidopsis Seedlings. Curr. Biol. 2020, 30, 2716–2728.e6.
  65. Moe-Lange, J.; Gappel, N.M.; Machado, M.; Wudick, M.M.; Sies, C.S.A.; Schott-Verdugo, S.N.; Bonus, M.; Mishra, S.; Hartwig, T.; Bezrutczyk, M.; et al. Interdependence of a Mechanosensitive Anion Channel and Glutamate Receptors in Distal Wound Signaling. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabg4298.
  66. Zou, Y.; Chintamanani, S.; He, P.; Fukushige, H.; Yu, L.; Shao, M.; Zhu, L.; Hildebrand, D.F.; Tang, X.; Zhou, J.-M. A Gain-of-Function Mutation in Msl10 Triggers Cell Death and Wound-Induced Hyperaccumulation of Jasmonic Acid in Arabidopsis: Role of a Mechanosensitive Ion Channel in Wounding. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2016, 58, 600–609.
  67. Limami, A.; Hirel, B.; Lothier, J. Does Potassium (K+) Contribute to High-Nitrate (NO3−) Weakening of a Plant’s Defense System against Necrotrophic Fungi? IJMS 2022, 23, 15631.
  68. Hedrich, R.; Salvador-Recatalà, V.; Dreyer, I. Electrical Wiring and Long-Distance Plant Communication. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 376–387.
  69. Cuin, T.; Dreyer, I.; Michard, E. The Role of Potassium Channels in Arabidopsis thaliana Long Distance Electrical Signalling: AKT2 Modulates Tissue Excitability While GORK Shapes Action Potentials. IJMS 2018, 19, 926.
  70. Hu, X.; Neill, S.; Cai, W.; Tang, Z. Hydrogen Peroxide and Jasmonic Acid Mediate Oligogalacturonic Acid-Induced Saponin Accumulation in Suspension-Cultured Cells of Panax ginseng. Physiol. Plant. 2003, 118, 414–421.
  71. Hu, X.; Neill, S.J.; Yang, Y.; Cai, W. Fungal Elicitor Pep-25 Increases Cytosolic Calcium Ions, H2O2 Production and Activates the Octadecanoid Pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 2009, 229, 1201–1208.
  72. Lv, F.; Li, S.; Feng, J.; Liu, P.; Gao, Z.; Yang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Wei, J. Hydrogen Peroxide Burst Triggers Accumulation of Jasmonates and Salicylic Acid Inducing Sesquiterpene Biosynthesis in Wounded Aquilaria sinesis. J. Plant Physiol. 2019, 234–235, 167–175.
  73. Hettenhausen, C.; Schuman, M.C.; Wu, J. MAPK Signaling: A Key Element in Plant Defense Response to Insects: MAPK Signaling in Plant-Insect Interactions. Insect Sci. 2015, 22, 157–164.
  74. Seo, S.; Okamoto, M.; Seto, H.; Ishizuka, K.; Sano, H.; Ohashi, Y. Tobacco MAP Kinase: A Possible Mediator in Wound Signal Transduction Pathways. Science 1995, 270, 1988–1992.
  75. Seo, S.; Sano, H.; Ohashi, Y. Jasmonate-Based Wound Signal Transduction Requires Activation of WIPK, a Tobacco Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase. Plant Cell 1999, 11, 289–298.
  76. Seo, S.; Katou, S.; Seto, H.; Gomi, K.; Ohashi, Y. The Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases WIPK and SIPK Regulate the Levels of Jasmonic and Salicylic Acids in Wounded Tobacco Plants: Roles of WIPK and SIPK in Wound Signalling. Plant J. 2007, 49, 899–909.
  77. Wang, Q.; Li, J.; Hu, L.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, G.; Lou, Y. OsMPK3 Positively Regulates the JA Signaling Pathway and Plant Resistance to a Chewing Herbivore in Rice. Plant Cell Rep. 2013, 32, 1075–1084.
  78. Vodeneev, V.A.; Opritov, V.A.; Pyatygin, S.S. Reversible Changes of Extracellular pH during Action Potential Generation in a Higher Plant Cucurbita Pepo. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2006, 53, 481–487.
  79. Duby, G.; Boutry, M. The Plant Plasma Membrane Proton Pump ATPase: A Highly Regulated P-Type ATPase with Multiple Physiological Roles. Pflug. Arch-Eur. J. Physiol. 2009, 457, 645–655.
  80. Ookura, T.; Komatsu, S.; Kawamura, Y.; Kasamo, K. A 55-KDa Calcium Dependent Protein Kinase Phosphorylated Thr Residues from the Auto-Regulatory Domain of Plasma Membrane H+-ATPase in Rice. JARQ 2005, 39, 99–104.
  81. Behera, S.; Xu, Z.; Luoni, L.; Bonza, M.C.; Doccula, F.G.; De Michelis, M.I.; Morris, R.J.; Schwarzländer, M.; Costa, A. Cellular Ca2+ Signals Generate Defined pH Signatures in Plants. Plant Cell 2018, 30, 2704–2719.
  82. Shao, Q.; Gao, Q.; Lhamo, D.; Zhang, H.; Luan, S. Two Glutamate- and pH-Regulated Ca2+ Channels Are Required for Systemic Wound Signaling in Arabidopsis. Sci. Signal. 2020, 13, eaba1453.
  83. Demidchik, V. ROS-Activated Ion Channels in Plants: Biophysical Characteristics, Physiological Functions and Molecular Nature. IJMS 2018, 19, 1263.
  84. Marcec, M.J.; Gilroy, S.; Poovaiah, B.W.; Tanaka, K. Mutual Interplay of Ca2+ and ROS Signaling in Plant Immune Response. Plant Sci. 2019, 283, 343–354.
  85. Xia, X.-J.; Zhou, Y.-H.; Shi, K.; Zhou, J.; Foyer, C.H.; Yu, J.-Q. Interplay between Reactive Oxygen Species and Hormones in the Control of Plant Development and Stress Tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 2839–2856.
  86. Pandey, G.K.; Cheong, Y.H.; Kim, K.-N.; Grant, J.J.; Li, L.; Hung, W.; D’Angelo, C.; Weinl, S.; Kudla, J.; Luan, S. The Calcium Sensor Calcineurin B-Like 9 Modulates Abscisic Acid Sensitivity and Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 1912–1924.
  87. Xiong, L.; Zhu, J.-K. Regulation of Abscisic Acid Biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133, 29–36.
  88. Hartung, W.; Radin, J.W.; Hendrix, D.L. Abscisic Acid Movement into the Apoplastic Solution of Water-Stressed Cotton Leaves: Role of Apoplastic pH. Plant Physiol. 1988, 86, 908–913.
  89. Netting, A.G. pH, Abscisic Acid and the Integration of Metabolism in Plants under Stressed and Non-Stressed Conditions. II. Modifications in Modes of Metabolism Induced by Variation in the Tension on the Water Column and by Stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 151–173.
  90. Duffield, P.H.; Netting, A.G. Methods for the Quantitation of Abscisic Acid and Its Precursors from Plant Tissues. Anal. Biochem. 2001, 289, 251–259.
  91. Finkelstein, R. Abscisic Acid Synthesis and Response. Arab. Book 2013, 11, e0166.
  92. Burla, B.; Pfrunder, S.; Nagy, R.; Francisco, R.M.; Lee, Y.; Martinoia, E. Vacuolar Transport of Abscisic Acid Glucosyl Ester Is Mediated by ATP-Binding Cassette and Proton-Antiport Mechanisms in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163, 1446–1458.
  93. Wang, Z.-Y.; Gehring, C.; Zhu, J.; Li, F.-M.; Zhu, J.-K.; Xiong, L. The Arabidopsis Vacuolar Sorting Receptor1 Is Required for Osmotic Stress-Induced Abscisic Acid Biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2014, 167, 137–152.
  94. McAdam, S.A.M.; Brodribb, T.J. Linking Turgor with ABA Biosynthesis: Implications for Stomatal Responses to Vapor Pressure Deficit across Land Plants. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 2008–2016.
  95. Sussmilch, F.C.; Brodribb, T.J.; McAdam, S.A.M. Up-Regulation of NCED3 and ABA Biosynthesis Occur within Minutes of a Decrease in Leaf Turgor but AHK1 Is Not Required. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2913–2918.
  96. Cardoso, A.A.; Gori, A.; Da-Silva, C.J.; Brunetti, C. Abscisic Acid Biosynthesis and Signaling in Plants: Key Targets to Improve Water Use Efficiency and Drought Tolerance. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6322.
  97. Romeis, T.; Herde, M. From Local to Global: CDPKs in Systemic Defense Signaling upon Microbial and Herbivore Attack. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 20, 1–10.
  98. Huang, W.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y. Biosynthesis and Regulation of Salicylic Acid and N-Hydroxypipecolic Acid in Plant Immunity. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 31–41.
  99. Gallé, A.; Lautner, S.; Flexas, J.; Fromm, J. Environmental Stimuli and Physiological Responses: The Current View on Electrical Signalling. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2015, 114, 15–21.
  100. Fabricant, A.; Iwata, G.Z.; Scherzer, S.; Bougas, L.; Rolfs, K.; Jodko-Władzińska, A.; Voigt, J.; Hedrich, R.; Budker, D. Action Potentials Induce Biomagnetic Fields in Carnivorous Venus Flytrap Plants. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1438.
  101. Harmer, S.L.; Brooks, C.J. Growth-Mediated Plant Movements: Hidden in Plain Sight. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2018, 41, 89–94.
  102. Fromm, J.; Hajirezaei, M.-R.; Becker, V.K.; Lautner, S. Electrical Signaling along the Phloem and Its Physiological Responses in the Maize Leaf. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 00239.
  103. Krausko, M.; Perutka, Z.; Šebela, M.; Šamajová, O.; Šamaj, J.; Novák, O.; Pavlovič, A. The Role of Electrical and Jasmonate Signalling in the Recognition of Captured Prey in the Carnivorous Sundew Plant Drosera Capensis. New Phytol. 2017, 213, 1818–1835.
  104. Vian, A.; Davies, E. Two Different Wound Signals Evoke Very Rapid, Systemic CMBP Transcript Accumulation in Tomato. Plant Signal. Behav. 2006, 1, 261–264.
  105. Koziolek, C.; Grams, T.E.E.; Schreiber, U.; Matyssek, R.; Fromm, J. Transient Knockout of Photosynthesis Mediated by Electrical Signals. New Phytol. 2004, 161, 715–722.
  106. Yudina, L.; Gromova, E.; Grinberg, M.; Popova, A.; Sukhova, E.; Sukhov, V. Influence of Burning-Induced Electrical Signals on Photosynthesis in Pea Can Be Modified by Soil Water Shortage. Plants 2022, 11, 534.
  107. Khokon, M.A.R.; Okuma, E.; Hossain, M.A.; Munemasa, S.; Uraji, M.; Nakamura, Y.; Mori, I.C.; Murata, Y. Involvement of Extracellular Oxidative Burst in Salicylic Acid-Induced Stomatal Closure in Arabidopsis: Extracellular ROS Mediate SA-Induced Stomatal Closure. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 34, 434–443.
  108. Prodhan, M.Y.; Munemasa, S.; Nahar, M.N.-E.-N.; Nakamura, Y.; Murata, Y. Guard Cell Salicylic Acid Signaling Is Integrated into Abscisic Acid Signaling via the Ca2+/CPK-Dependent Pathway. Plant Physiol. 2018, 178, 441–450.
  109. Surova, L.; Sherstneva, O.; Vodeneev, V.; Katicheva, L.; Semina, M.; Sukhov, V. Variation Potential-Induced Photosynthetic and Respiratory Changes Increase ATP Content in Pea Leaves. J. Plant Physiol. 2016, 202, 57–64.
  110. Gallé, A.; Lautner, S.; Flexas, J.; Ribas-Carbo, M.; Hanson, D.; Roesgen, J.; Fromm, J. Photosynthetic Responses of Soybean (Glycine max L.) to Heat-Induced Electrical Signalling Are Predominantly Governed by Modifications of Mesophyll Conductance for CO2: Electrical Signalling and Mesophyll Conductance in Soybean. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36, 542–552.
  111. Grams, T.E.E.; Lautner, S.; Felle, H.H.; Matyssek, R.; Fromm, J. Heat-Induced Electrical Signals Affect Cytoplasmic and Apoplastic pH as Well as Photosynthesis during Propagation through the Maize Leaf. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32, 319–326.
  112. Vuralhan-Eckert, J.; Lautner, S.; Fromm, J. Effect of Simultaneously Induced Environmental Stimuli on Electrical Signalling and Gas Exchange in Maize Plants. J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 223, 32–36.
  113. Białasek, M.; Górecka, M.; Mittler, R.; Karpiński, S. Evidence for the Involvement of Electrical, Calcium and ROS Signaling in the Systemic Regulation of Non-Photochemical Quenching and Photosynthesis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017, 58, 207–215.
  114. Lautner, S.; Grams, T.E.E.; Matyssek, R.; Fromm, J. Characteristics of Electrical Signals in Poplar and Responses in Photosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2005, 138, 2200–2209.
  115. Sukhov, V.; Sherstneva, O.; Surova, L.; Katicheva, L.; Vodeneev, V. Proton Cellular Influx as a Probable Mechanism of Variation Potential Influence on Photosynthesis in Pea: VP Influences on Photosynthesis Due to H+ Influx. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 2532–2541.
  116. Sukhov, V. Electrical Signals as Mechanism of Photosynthesis Regulation in Plants. Photosynth. Res. 2016, 130, 373–387.
  117. Sherstneva, O.N.; Surova, L.M.; Vodeneev, V.A.; Plotnikova, Y.I.; Bushueva, A.V.; Sukhov, V.S. The Role of the Intra- and Extracellular Protons in the Photosynthetic Response Induced by the Variation Potential in Pea Seedlings. Biochem. Mosc. Suppl. Ser. A 2016, 10, 60–67.
  118. Sherstneva, O.N.; Vodeneev, V.A.; Katicheva, L.A.; Surova, L.M.; Sukhov, V.S. Participation of Intracellular and Extracellular pH Changes in Photosynthetic Response Development Induced by Variation Potential in Pumpkin Seedlings. Biochem. Mosc. 2015, 80, 776–784.
  119. Attaran, E.; Major, I.T.; Cruz, J.A.; Rosa, B.A.; Koo, A.J.K.; Chen, J.; Kramer, D.M.; He, S.Y.; Howe, G.A. Temporal Dynamics of Growth and Photosynthesis Suppression in Response to Jasmonate Signaling. Plant Physiol. 2014, 165, 1302–1314.
  120. Herde, O.; Pena-Cortes, H.; Willmitzer, L.; Fisahn, J. Stomatal Responses to Jasmonic Acid, Linolenic Acid and Abscisic Acid in Wild-Type and ABA-Deficient Tomato Plants. Plant Cell Env. 1997, 20, 136–141.
  121. Nabity, P.D.; Zavala, J.A.; DeLucia, E.H. Herbivore Induction of Jasmonic Acid and Chemical Defences Reduce Photosynthesis in Nicotiana attenuata. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 685–694.
  122. Gorecka, M.; Alvarez-Fernandez, R.; Slattery, K.; McAusland, L.; Davey, P.A.; Karpinski, S.; Lawson, T.; Mullineaux, P.M. Abscisic Acid Signalling Determines Susceptibility of Bundle Sheath Cells to Photoinhibition in High Light-Exposed Arabidopsis Leaves. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 2014, 369, 20130234.
  123. Chen, K.; Li, G.; Bressan, R.A.; Song, C.; Zhu, J.; Zhao, Y. Abscisic Acid Dynamics, Signaling, and Functions in Plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020, 62, 25–54.
  124. Wang, J.; Song, L.; Gong, X.; Xu, J.; Li, M. Functions of Jasmonic Acid in Plant Regulation and Response to Abiotic Stress. IJMS 2020, 21, 1446.
  125. Buckley, T.N. Modeling Stomatal Conductance. Plant Physiol. 2017, 174, 572–582.
  126. Jezek, M.; Blatt, M.R. The Membrane Transport System of the Guard Cell and Its Integration for Stomatal Dynamics. Plant Physiol. 2017, 174, 487–519.
  127. Bright, J.; Desikan, R.; Hancock, J.T.; Weir, I.S.; Neill, S.J. ABA-Induced NO Generation and Stomatal Closure in Arabidopsis Are Dependent on H2O2 Synthesis. Plant J. 2006, 45, 113–122.
  128. Jahan, M.S.; Nozulaidi, M.; Khairi, M.; Mat, N. Light-Harvesting Complexes in Photosystem II Regulate Glutathione-Induced Sensitivity of Arabidopsis Guard Cells to Abscisic Acid. J. Plant Physiol. 2016, 195, 1–8.
  129. Kwak, J.M. NADPH Oxidase AtrbohD and AtrbohF Genes Function in ROS-Dependent ABA Signaling in Arabidopsis. EMBO J. 2003, 22, 2623–2633.
  130. Munemasa, S.; Hossain, M.A.; Nakamura, Y.; Mori, I.C.; Murata, Y. The Arabidopsis Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinase, CPK6, Functions as a Positive Regulator of Methyl Jasmonate Signaling in Guard Cells. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155, 553–561.
  131. Pei, Z.-M.; Murata, Y.; Benning, G.; Thomine, S.; Klüsener, B.; Allen, G.J.; Grill, E.; Schroeder, J.I. Calcium Channels Activated by Hydrogen Peroxide Mediate Abscisic Acid signalling in Guard Cells. Nature 2000, 406, 731–734.
  132. Peña-Cortés, H.; Fisahn, J.; Willmitzer, L. Signals Involved in Wound-Induced Proteinase Inhibitor II Gene Expression in Tomato and Potato Plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 4106–4113.
  133. Savchenko, T.; Kolla, V.A.; Wang, C.-Q.; Nasafi, Z.; Hicks, D.R.; Phadungchob, B.; Chehab, W.E.; Brandizzi, F.; Froehlich, J.; Dehesh, K. Functional Convergence of Oxylipin and Abscisic Acid Pathways Controls Stomatal Closure in Response to Drought. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 1151–1160.
  134. Suhita, D.; Raghavendra, A.S.; Kwak, J.M.; Vavasseur, A. Cytoplasmic Alkalization Precedes Reactive Oxygen Species Production during Methyl Jasmonate- and Abscisic Acid-Induced Stomatal Closure. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1536–1545.
  135. Gehring, C. Jasmonates Induce Intracellular Alkalinization and Closure Of Paphiopedilum Guard Cells. Ann. Bot. 1997, 80, 485–489.
  136. Geng, S.; Misra, B.B.; de Armas, E.; Huhman, D.V.; Alborn, H.T.; Sumner, L.W.; Chen, S. Jasmonate-Mediated Stomatal Closure under Elevated CO2 Revealed by Time-Resolved Metabolomics. Plant J. 2016, 88, 947–962.
  137. Förster, S.; Schmidt, L.K.; Kopic, E.; Anschütz, U.; Huang, S.; Schlücking, K.; Köster, P.; Waadt, R.; Larrieu, A.; Batistič, O.; et al. Wounding-Induced Stomatal Closure Requires Jasmonate-Mediated Activation of GORK K+ Channels by a Ca2+ Sensor-Kinase CBL1-CIPK5 Complex. Dev. Cell 2019, 48, 87–99.e6.
  138. Zhou, Z.; Wu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Du, M.; Zhang, X.; Guo, Y.; Li, C.; Zhou, J.-M. An Arabidopsis Plasma Membrane Proton ATPase Modulates JA Signaling and Is Exploited by the Pseudomonas syringae Effector Protein AvrB for Stomatal Invasion. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 2032–2041.
  139. De Ollas, C.; Arbona, V.; Gómez-Cadenas, A.; Dodd, I.C. Attenuated Accumulation of Jasmonates Modifies Stomatal Responses to Water Deficit. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 2103–2116.
  140. Hossain, M.A.; Munemasa, S.; Uraji, M.; Nakamura, Y.; Mori, I.C.; Murata, Y. Involvement of Endogenous Abscisic Acid in Methyl Jasmonate-Induced Stomatal Closure in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 430–438.
  141. Wang, S.Y. Methyl Jasmonate Reduces Water Stress in Strawberry. J. Plant Growth Regul 1999, 18, 127–134.
  142. Yan, S.; McLamore, E.S.; Dong, S.; Gao, H.; Taguchi, M.; Wang, N.; Zhang, T.; Su, X.; Shen, Y. The Role of Plasma Membrane H+-ATPase in Jasmonate-induced Ion Fluxes and Stomatal Closure in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2015, 83, 638–649.
  143. Murata, Y.; Pei, Z.-M.; Mori, I.C.; Schroeder, J. Abscisic Acid Activation of Plasma Membrane Ca2+ Channels in Guard Cells Requires Cytosolic NAD(P)H and Is Differentially Disrupted Upstream and Downstream of Reactive Oxygen Species Production in Abi1-1 and Abi2-1 Protein Phosphatase 2C Mutants. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 2513–2523.
  144. Huang, S.; Waadt, R.; Nuhkat, M.; Kollist, H.; Hedrich, R.; Roelfsema, M.R.G. Calcium Signals in Guard Cells Enhance the Efficiency by Which Abscisic Acid Triggers Stomatal Closure. New Phytol. 2019, 224, 177–187.
  145. Chan, C.; Panzeri, D.; Okuma, E.; Tõldsepp, K.; Wang, Y.-Y.; Louh, G.-Y.; Chin, T.-C.; Yeh, Y.-H.; Yeh, H.-L.; Yekondi, S.; et al. STRESS INDUCED FACTOR 2 Regulates Arabidopsis Stomatal Immunity through Phosphorylation of the Anion Channel SLAC1. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 2216–2236.
  146. Munemasa, S.; Oda, K.; Watanabe-Sugimoto, M.; Nakamura, Y.; Shimoishi, Y.; Murata, Y. The Coronatine—Insensitive 1 Mutation Reveals the Hormonal Signaling Interaction between Abscisic Acid and Methyl Jasmonate in Arabidopsis Guard Cells. Specific Impairment of Ion Channel Activation and Second Messenger Production. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 1398–1407.
  147. Melotto, M.; Underwood, W.; Koczan, J.; Nomura, K.; He, S.Y. Plant Stomata Function in Innate Immunity against Bacterial Invasion. Cell 2006, 126, 969–980.
  148. MacRobbie, E.A.C. Signalling in Guard Cells and Regulation of Ion Channel Activity. J. Exp. Bot. 1997, 48, 515–528.
  149. Manthe, B.; Schulz, M.; Schnabl, H. Effects of Salicylic Acid on Growth and Stomatal Movements of Vicia faba L.: Evidence for Salicylic Acid Metabolization. J. Chem. Ecol. 1992, 18, 1525–1539.
  150. Mori, I.C.; Pinontoan, R.; Kawano, T.; Muto, S. Involvement of Superoxide Generation in Salicylic Acid-Induced Stomatal Closure in Vicia faba. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001, 42, 1383–1388.
  151. Khokon, M.A.R.; Salam, M.A.; Jammes, F.; Ye, W.; Hossain, M.A.; Okuma, E.; Nakamura, Y.; Mori, I.C.; Kwak, J.M.; Murata, Y. MPK9 and MPK12 Function in SA-Induced Stomatal Closure in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2017, 81, 1394–1400.
  152. Zottini, M.; Costa, A.; De Michele, R.; Ruzzene, M.; Carimi, F.; Lo Schiavo, F. Salicylic Acid Activates Nitric Oxide Synthesis in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 1397–1405.
  153. Chen, Y.; Pang, Q.; Dai, S.; Wang, Y.; Chen, S.; Yan, X. Proteomic Identification of Differentially Expressed Proteins in Arabidopsis in Response to Methyl Jasmonate. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 168, 995–1008.
  154. Sirhindi, G.; Mushtaq, R.; Gill, S.S.; Sharma, P.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Ahmad, P. Jasmonic Acid and Methyl Jasmonate Modulate Growth, Photosynthetic Activity and Expression of Photosystem II Subunit Genes in Brassica oleracea L. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 9322.
  155. Böhm, J.; Scherzer, S.; Krol, E.; Kreuzer, I.; von Meyer, K.; Lorey, C.; Mueller, T.D.; Shabala, L.; Monte, I.; Solano, R.; et al. The Venus Flytrap Dionaea muscipula Counts Prey-Induced Action Potentials to Induce Sodium Uptake. Curr. Biol. 2016, 26, 286–295.
  156. Vian, A.; Henry-Vian, C.; Schantz, R.; Ledoigt, G.; Frachisse, J.-M.; Desbiez, M.-O.; Julien, J.-L. Is Membrane Potential Involved in Calmodulin Gene Expression after External Stimulation in Plants? FEBS Lett. 1996, 380, 93–96.
  157. Major, I.T.; Yoshida, Y.; Campos, M.L.; Kapali, G.; Xin, X.; Sugimoto, K.; Oliveira Ferreira, D.; He, S.Y.; Howe, G.A. Regulation of Growth–Defense Balance by the JASMONATE ZIM-DOMAIN (JAZ)-MYC Transcriptional Module. New Phytol. 2017, 215, 1533–1547.
  158. Guo, Q.; Yoshida, Y.; Major, I.T.; Wang, K.; Sugimoto, K.; Kapali, G.; Havko, N.E.; Benning, C.; Howe, G.A. JAZ Repressors of Metabolic Defense Promote Growth and Reproductive Fitness in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E10768–E10777.
  159. Chehab, E.W.; Yao, C.; Henderson, Z.; Kim, S.; Braam, J. Arabidopsis Touch-Induced Morphogenesis Is Jasmonate Mediated and Protects against Pests. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22, 701–706.
  160. Blanco, F.; Salinas, P.; Cecchini, N.M.; Jordana, X.; Van Hummelen, P.; Alvarez, M.E.; Holuigue, L. Early Genomic Responses to Salicylic Acid in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2009, 70, 79–102.
  161. Herrera-Vásquez, A.; Salinas, P.; Holuigue, L. Salicylic Acid and Reactive Oxygen Species Interplay in the Transcriptional Control of Defense Genes Expression. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 00171.
  162. Lukan, T.; Coll, A. Intertwined Roles of Reactive Oxygen Species and Salicylic Acid Signaling Are Crucial for the Plant Response to Biotic Stress. IJMS 2022, 23, 5568.
  163. Mateo, A. Controlled Levels of Salicylic Acid Are Required for Optimal Photosynthesis and Redox Homeostasis. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 1795–1807.
  164. Fryer, M.J.; Ball, L.; Oxborough, K.; Karpinski, S.; Mullineaux, P.M.; Baker, N.R. Control of Ascorbate Peroxidase 2 Expression by Hydrogen Peroxide and Leaf Water Status during Excess Light Stress Reveals a Functional Organisation of Arabidopsis Leaves. Plant J. 2003, 33, 691–705.
  165. Wang, F.; Guo, Z.; Li, H.; Wang, M.; Onac, E.; Zhou, J.; Xia, X.; Shi, K.; Yu, J.; Zhou, Y. Phytochrome A and B Function Antagonistically to Regulate Cold Tolerance via Abscisic Acid-Dependent Jasmonate Signaling. Plant Physiol. 2016, 170, 459–471.
  166. Caarls, L.; Pieterse, C.M.J.; Van Wees, S.C.M. How Salicylic Acid Takes Transcriptional Control over Jasmonic Acid Signaling. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 00170.
  167. Ndamukong, I.; Abdallat, A.A.; Thurow, C.; Fode, B.; Zander, M.; Weigel, R.; Gatz, C. SA-Inducible Arabidopsis Glutaredoxin Interacts with TGA Factors and Suppresses JA-Responsive PDF1.2 Transcription: Interaction of Glutaredoxin with TGA Factors. Plant J. 2007, 50, 128–139.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Plant Sciences
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : Maria Ladeynova ,
Darya Kuznetsova
,
Maxim Mudrilov
, Vladimir Vodeneev
View Times: 790
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 12 Jan 2023
Table of Contents
    Notice
    You are not a member of the advisory board for this topic. If you want to update advisory board member profile, please contact office@encyclopedia.pub.
    OK
    Confirm
    Only members of the Encyclopedia advisory board for this topic are allowed to note entries. Would you like to become an advisory board member of the Encyclopedia?
    Yes
    No
    ${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
    Submit
    Cancel
    There is no comment~
    ${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
    Submit
    Cancel
    ${ selectedItem.replyTextCharacter }/${ selectedItem.replyMaxCharacter }
    Submit
    Cancel
    Confirm
    Are you sure to Delete?
    Yes No
    Academic Video Service
    Feedback