Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Ahmad Umar
 -- 1685 2023-01-05 08:02:59 |
2 layout
Sirius Huang
 Meta information modification 1685 2023-01-06 10:30:16 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Abd-Elrahman, N.K.;  Al-Harbi, N.;  Al-Hadeethi, Y.;  Alruqi, A.B.;  Mohammed, H.;  Umar, A.;  Akbar, S. Application of Nanomaterials in Microbial Electrolysis Cells. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/39775 (accessed on 03 July 2024).
Abd-Elrahman NK,  Al-Harbi N,  Al-Hadeethi Y,  Alruqi AB,  Mohammed H,  Umar A, et al. Application of Nanomaterials in Microbial Electrolysis Cells. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/39775. Accessed July 03, 2024.
Abd-Elrahman, Nabil. K., Nuha Al-Harbi, Yas Al-Hadeethi, Adel Bandar Alruqi, Hiba Mohammed, Ahmad Umar, Sheikh Akbar. "Application of Nanomaterials in Microbial Electrolysis Cells" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/39775 (accessed July 03, 2024).
Abd-Elrahman, N.K.,  Al-Harbi, N.,  Al-Hadeethi, Y.,  Alruqi, A.B.,  Mohammed, H.,  Umar, A., & Akbar, S. (2023, January 05). Application of Nanomaterials in Microbial Electrolysis Cells. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/39775
Abd-Elrahman, Nabil. K., et al. "Application of Nanomaterials in Microbial Electrolysis Cells." Encyclopedia. Web. 05 January, 2023.
Application of Nanomaterials in Microbial Electrolysis Cells
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/molecules27238594

Microbial Electrolysis Cells (MECs) are one of the bioreactors that have been used to produce bio-hydrogen by biological methods. Nanomaterials, especially when used to produce bio-hydrogen using MEC, are distinguished by their high electrical conductivity, high interaction surface area, high durability of materials, high catalytic ability to produce bio-hydrogen in MEC, biocompatibility with microorganisms and non-toxicity.

Microbial Electrolysis Cells (MECs) bio-hydrogen production rates (Bio-HPR) nanomaterials

1. Introduction

Hydrogen is considered one of the most promising and clean energy sources in the twenty-first century (future fuel) due to the fact that it contains many distinctive and effective properties, such as high energy conversion, large storage capacity, broad specific energy, renewable production and is environment friendly with zero emissions. It is widely used in industrial processes such as ammonia synthesis and petroleum refining, and thus hydrogen production is finding significant global interest [1][2].
Hydrogen is produced from fossil fuel sources with 96% of global hydrogen as follows: 48% from natural gas reforming, steam reforming or partial oxidation, 30% from naphtha reforming, and 18% from coal gasification [3]. However, hydrogen production in this way causes high-energy consumption and serious environmental pollution. Therefore, alternative ways to produce hydrogen from renewable environmental sources called biomass were searched for using biological methods [4].
Hydrogen production using biomass is considered better because of its high annual production and the reserves of its presence in the environment in large quantities, in addition to the ease of oxidation compared to hydrogen production using fossil fuel sources. The sources of biomass used in hydrogen production include agricultural waste, forest waste, domestic wastewater, industrial wastewater, carboxylic acids, polyols, sugars, wood waste, cellulose, lignin and microorganisms such as algae and bacteria [5][6].
There are several methods used to produce hydrogen fuel, called biological methods, including the photolysis method, photo fermentation method (PF), dark fermentation method (DF), double light fermentation method and microbial electrolysis method (MEC). Hydrogen produced from the use of biological methods is called bio-hydrogen [7].
Microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) is a biological method used to produce bio-hydrogen. Bio-hydrogen is produced in the MEC using multiple substrates, such as acetate, glycerol, glucose and various environmental wastes such as domestic wastewater and industrial wastewater. Bacteria and an applied voltage are used in MEC to decompose organic matter and produce electrons, protons and carbon dioxide. Bio-hydrogen in the MEC is produced by combining electrons with protons in a cathode chamber [8].
MEC was discovered and named for the first time as “electrochemical assisted hydrogen generation”, then “bio-catalyzed electrolysis”, “photoelectric generation”, and finally researchers agreed in their studies on the name “Microbial Electrolysis Cells’’ (MEC) [9]. MECs have many advantages that make them the best biological methods used for bio-hydrogen production. Firstly, environmental waste and renewable resources can be used as substrates for hydrogen production instead of fossil fuels. Secondly, bacteria can be used to transform various organic materials such as acetate, glucose, glycerol, cellulose, acetic acid, domestic wastewater and industrial wastewater to bio-hydrogen in the MEC. Thirdly, the productive efficiency of bio-hydrogen production using MEC is from 80–100%, compared to that of the electrolysis of water, which is about 65%, and that of dark fermentation, which is about 33%. In addition, MECs need an electric power supply of about 0.2–0.8 V, which is smaller than the voltage required for the electrolysis of conventional water (1.8–2 V) [10].
Nanomaterials have been used in many different engineering fields with the aim of finding a solution to technical problems and finding inexpensive solutions to improve and raise production and technical efficiency, due to the distinctive and different properties of nanomaterials that are not found in their bulk counterparts. The main objective of using nanomaterials in MEC is to improve the properties and performance of the basic components of MEC, which are the electrodes (anode and cathode), proton exchange membranes (PEM) and hydrogen production catalysts, or to replace the high-cost components with inexpensive components commensurate with the economics of hydrogen production in this way. Nanomaterials, especially when used to produce bio-hydrogen using MEC, are distinguished by their high electrical conductivity, high interaction surface area, high durability of materials, high catalytic ability to produce bio-hydrogen in MEC, biocompatibility with microorganisms and non-toxicity [11][12].

2. Microbial Electrolysis Cells (MECs)

MECs are one of the bioreactors used to produce bio-hydrogen. Hydrogen fuel is a renewable energy source. Hydrogen is produced in the MEC using organic waste. Bacteria decompose and oxidize the organic matter in the substrates and produce electrons, protons and carbon dioxide. Electrons are released by bacteria in the anode chamber and then collect at the anode electrode. The electrons are then transferred from the anode electrode to the cathode electrode via external electrical circuits [13]. Protons are transferred from the anode chamber to the cathode chamber through the PEM in a double-chamber MEC and directly through solution in a single-chamber MEC. The protons combine with the electrons in the cathode chamber to produce hydrogen gas. However, the production of bio-hydrogen at the cathode is an endothermic reaction and therefore requires an applied voltage (0.2–0.8 V) [14]. The applied voltage (power supply) for bio-hydrogen production at the MEC (0.2–0.9 V) is much lower than for water electrolysis (1.23–1.8 V). The role of microbes is at play in producing electrons during the oxidation and decomposition of organic matter in substrates [15]. The basic reactions of bio-hydrogen production in MEC can be illustrated using acetate as a substrate for hydrogen production.
The following equations show the substrate decomposition reactions in the anode chamber and the hydrogen production reactions in the cathode chamber:
Anode: C2H4O2 + 2H2O → 2CO2 + 8e− + 8H+
Cathode: 8H+ + 8e− → 4H2
The rate of bio-hydrogen production in the MEC is influenced by several main factors that affect the efficiency of the performance of the MEC, which are the shape and type of the MEC (double-chamber or single-chamber), the type of materials from which the electrodes are made (anode and cathode) and the raw materials or substrate used to produce bio hydrogen [16][17].

2.1. MEC Types and Shapes

Bio-hydrogen production rates are directly affected by MEC formation. MEC is divided into two main configurations: (1) double chamber MEC and (2) single chamber MEC. They have almost the same work principle. There is one difference between them, which is that there is only a PEM in the formation of the double-chambered MEC. There are many shapes of MEC, such as H-shaped, cubic, tubular or cassette-like [18].

2.1.1. Double-Chamber MEC

Double-chamber MEC is characterized by the presence of a PEM that separates the anode and cathode chambers. Double-chamber MEC takes an H-shape. The PEM is located in a channel connecting the anode and the cathode chambers. PEM is an important component of MEC because it prevents hydrogen diffusion from the cathode chamber to the anode chamber. Examples of membranes that have been used in MEC double chambers are proton exchange membranes (PEM), cation exchange membranes (CEM), and charge mosaic membranes (CMM). Bio-hydrogen is formed in the cathode chamber as a result of electron transfer from the anode to the cathode through the external circuit connecting the anode to the cathode, while H+ ions move across the membrane towards the cathode chamber [17][19].
Bio-hydrogen is produced in MEC under anaerobic conditions for both the anode and the cathode chambers. The anode chamber contains bacteria that decompose the organic matter of the materials used to produce bio-hydrogen, and electrons are released. In the cathode chamber, the electrons combine with H+ ions forming hydrogen gas, which is collected in a tube above the cathode chamber [20].
The double-chamber MEC is characterized by its high efficiency in hydrogen production because it works on the migration of hydrogen ions from the anode chamber to the cathode chamber through the PEM and prevents the diffusion of oxygen hydrogen. A disadvantage of the double-chamber MEC is the higher manufacturing cost of expensive PEMs and the increased internal resistance [21].

2.1.2. Single-Chamber MEC

The single-chamber MEC system was proposed and designed in 2008. Single-chamber MEC does not require an ion exchange membrane and both anode and cathode electrodes are located in one anaerobic chamber. Single-chamber MEC is not very different from double-chamber MEC in bio-hydrogen production reactions. In a single-chamber MEC, the organic matter in the substrate used to produce hydrogen is degraded by bacteria, releasing electrons, hydrogen ions and carbon dioxide. Electrons transfer from the anode to the cathode through the external circuit. The protons move directly to the cathode and combine with the electrons to produce bio-hydrogen [22].
The single-chamber MEC has the advantage of suitable design for practical applications due to its low manufacturing cost. The disadvantage of a single-chamber MEC is the easy diffusion of hydrogen to the anode, which leads to methane production and significant energy loss due to the discontinuation of anode reactions and methanogenic bacteria consuming the resulting hydrogen [23].

3. Application of Nanomaterials in MECs

The use of nanomaterials for bio-hydrogen production in MEC has been applied in many different ways, including thermal annealing, electrochemical anodizing, and electrodeposition. For example, in the thermal annealing method, the metal is exposed to a higher temperature than the normal temperature and then recrystallized. Fan et al. (2011) collected Au and Pd elements and exposed them to different temperatures ranging from 600 to 800 °C in order to convert them into nanomaterials [24]. In another study by Kim et al. (2018), the electrochemical oxidation method of Ti flakes with ethylene glycol electrolyte was used to obtain an external photo-anode of TiO2 array of nanotubes. The aim of the study was to modify the surface of the electrode to improve the reaction efficiency [25]. Several studies have shown that the electrodeposition method increases the Bio-HPR in the MEC [26].
Jayabalan et al. (2020, 2021) used a chemical deposition method to manufacture cathode catalysts from nickel molybdate (NiMoO4), nickel oxide (NiO) and cobalt oxide (Co3O4) nanoparticles [27][28]. Raney et al. (2021) also synthesized cathode catalysts from magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles using a chemical deposition method [29].
The use of nanomaterials in MEC has been applied in different ways, including: (1) the addition of nanomaterials to the anode electrodes to improve the oxidation reactions of organic matter and electron transfer reactions; (2) using nanomaterials as cathode catalysts for the cathode electrode to improve bio-hydrogen production rates; and (3) the addition of nanomaterials to PEM to improve the membrane efficiency in bio-hydrogen production rates through the speed of proton exchange and resistance to biofouling of the membranes [30].

References

  1. Zhang, B.; Zhang, S.X.; Yao, R.; Wu, Y.H.; Qiu, J.S. Progress and prospects of hydrogen production: Opportunities and challenges. J. Electron. Sci. Technol. 2021, 19, 100080.
  2. AlZahrani, A.A.; Dincer, I. Exergoeconomic analysis of hydrogen production using a standalone high-temperature electrolyzer. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 13899–13907.
  3. Suman, S. Hybrid nuclear-renewable energy systems: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 181, 166–177.
  4. Parkinson, B.; Balcombe, P.; Speirs, J.F.; Hawkes, A.D.; Hellgardt, K. Levelized cost of CO2 mitigation from hydrogen production routes. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 19–40.
  5. Tan, R.S.; Tuan Abdullah, T.A.; Johari, A.; Md Isa, K. Catalytic steam reforming of tar for enhancing hydrogen production from biomass gasification: A review. Front. Energy 2020, 14, 545–569.
  6. Sanchez, N.; Ruiz, R.; Hacker, V.; Cobo, M. Impact of bioethanol impurities on steam reforming for hydrogen production: A review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 11923–11942.
  7. Kadier, A.; Kalil, M.S.; Abdeshahian, P.; Chandrasekhar, K.; Mohamed, A.; Azman, N.F.; Logroño, W.; Simayi, Y.; Hamid, A.A. Recent advances and emerging challenges in microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) for microbial production of hydrogen and value-added chemicals. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 61, 501–525.
  8. Sharma, P.; Bano, A.; Singh, S.P.; Atkinson, J.D.; Lam, S.S.; Iqbal, H.M.; Tong, Y.W. Nanomaterials as highly efficient photocatalysts used for bioenergy and biohydrogen production from waste toward a sustainable environment. Fuel 2022, 329, 125408.
  9. Catal, T.; Lesnik, K.L.; Liu, H. Suppression of methanogenesis for hydrogen production in single-chamber microbial electrolysis cells using various antibiotics. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 187, 77–83.
  10. Khan, M.Z.; Nizami, A.S.; Rehan, M.; Ouda, O.K.M.; Sultana, S.; Ismail, I.M.; Shahzad, K. Microbial electrolysis cells for hydrogen production and urban wastewater treatment: A case study of Saudi Arabia. Appl. Energy 2017, 185, 410–420.
  11. Olabi, A.G.; Wilberforce, T.; Sayed, E.T.; Elsaid, K.; Rezk, H.; Abdelkareem, M.A. Recent progress of graphene based nanomaterials in bioelectrochemical systems. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 749, 141225.
  12. Si, X.; Zhao, Z.; Chen, J.; Lu, R.; Lu, F. Low-Temperature Efficient Hydrogen Production from Raw Biomass on the Ni–Mo Catalyst. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 10629–10637.
  13. Logan, B.E.; Rossi, R.; Ragab, A.; Saikaly, P.E. Electroactive microorganisms in bioelectrochemical systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 307–319.
  14. Park, S.G.; Rajesh, P.P.; Sim, Y.U.; Jadhav, D.A.; Noori, M.T.; Kim, D.H.; Al-Qaradawi, S.Y.; Yang, E.; Jang, J.K.; Chae, K.J. Addressing scale-up challenges and enhancement in performance of hydrogen-producing microbial electrolysis cell through electrode modifications. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 2726–2746.
  15. Kracke, F.; Vassilev, I.; Krömer, J.O. Microbial electron transport and energy conservation–the foundation for optimizing bioelectrochemical systems. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 575.
  16. Kaabi, A.; Tliha, M.; Belgacem, Y.B.; Dhahri, A.; Khaldi, C.; Lamloumi, J. Influence of electrolyte concentration on the electrochemical characteristics of LaGaO3 perovskite oxide as novel anode material for Ni/MH batteries. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 15743–15746.
  17. Haque, S.; Singh, R.; Pal, D.B.; Faidah, H.; Ashgar, S.S.; Areeshi, M.Y.; Almalki, A.H.; Verma, B.; Srivastava, N.; Gupta, V.K. Thermophilic biohydrogen production strategy using agro industrial wastes: Current update, challenges, and sustainable solutions. Chemosphere 2022, 2022, 136120.
  18. Muddasar, M.; Liaquat, R.; Aslam, A.; Ur Rahman, M.Z.; Abdullah, A.; Khoja, A.H.; Latif, K.; Bahadar, A. Performance efficiency comparison of microbial electrolysis cells for sustainable production of biohydrogen—A comprehensive review. Int. J. Energy Res. 2022, 46, 5625–5645.
  19. Kadier, A.; Simayi, Y.; Abdeshahian, P.; Azman, N.F.; Chandrasekhar, K.; Kalil, M.S. A comprehensive review of microbial electrolysis cells (MEC) reactor designs and configurations for sustainable hydrogen gas production. Alex. Eng. J. 2016, 55, 427–443.
  20. Shao, Q.; Li, J.; Yang, S.; Sun, H. Effects of different substrates on microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) anodic membrane: Biodiversity and hydrogen production performance. Water Sci. Technol. 2019, 79, 1123–1133.
  21. Miller, A.; Singh, L.; Wang, L.; Liu, H. Linking internal resistance with design and operation decisions in microbial electrolysis cells. Environ. Int. 2019, 126, 611–618.
  22. Montpart, N.; Rago, L.; Baeza, J.A.; Guisasola, A. Hydrogen production in single chamber microbial electrolysis cells with different complex substrates. Water Res. 2015, 68, 601–615.
  23. Noori, M.T.; Vu, M.T.; Ali, R.B.; Min, B. Recent advances in cathode materials and configurations for upgrading methane in bioelectrochemical systems integrated with anaerobic digestion. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 392, 123689.
  24. Fan, Y.; Xu, S.; Schaller, R.; Jiao, J.; Chaplen, F.; Liu, H. Nanoparticle decorated anodes for enhanced current generation in microbial electrochemical cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 26, 1908–1912.
  25. Kim, K.N.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, H.; Park, Y.H.; In, S.I. Improved microbial electrolysis cell hydrogen production by hybridization with a TiO2 nanotube array photoanode. Energies 2018, 11, 3184.
  26. Fang, X.; Cheng, Y.; Li, S.; Dai, H.; Zhao, Y.; Du, X.; Ma, X.; Hao, X. Fabrication of durian-like CoNi/CoFe2O4 composite electrocatalysts on nickel foam for hydrogen evolution in a microbial electrolysis cell. Int. J. Energy Res. 2022, 46, 340–350.
  27. Jayabalan, T.; Matheswaran, M.; Radhakrishnan, T.K.; Mohamed, S.N. Influence of Nickel molybdate nanocatalyst for enhancing biohydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cell utilizing sugar industrial effluent. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 320, 124284.
  28. Jayabalan, T.; Naina Mohamed, S.; Matheswaran, M.; Radhakrishnan, T.K.; Pugazhendhi, A.; Alagarsamy, A. Enhanced biohydrogen production from sugar industry effluent using nickel oxide and cobalt oxide as cathode nanocatalysts in microbial electrolysis cell. Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 17431–17439.
  29. Rani, G.; Krishna, K.; Yogalakshmi, K.N. Enhancing the electrochemical performance of Fe3O4 nanoparticles layered carbon electrodes in Microbial Electrolysis Cell. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106326.
  30. Kim, B.; Yang, E.; Kim, B.; Obaid, M.; Jang, J.K.; Chae, K.J. Recent Application of Nanomaterials to Overcome Technological Challenges of Microbial Electrolysis Cells. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1316.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Nanoscience & Nanotechnology
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Nabil. K. Abd-Elrahman
,
Nuha Al-Harbi
,
Yas Al-Hadeethi
,
Adel Bandar Alruqi
,
Hiba Mohammed
,
Ahmad Umar
,
Sheikh Akbar
View Times: 484
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 06 Jan 2023
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Video Production Service
    Feedback