Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Manuel Obermaier
 -- 5996 2022-12-16 12:20:57 |
2 format
Jason Zhu
Meta information modification 5996 2022-12-20 04:32:26 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Obermaier, M.;  Katzenschlager, S.;  Kofler, O.;  Weilbacher, F.;  Popp, E. Advanced and Invasive Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Techniques. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/38869 (accessed on 02 May 2024).
Obermaier M,  Katzenschlager S,  Kofler O,  Weilbacher F,  Popp E. Advanced and Invasive Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Techniques. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/38869. Accessed May 02, 2024.
Obermaier, Manuel, Stephan Katzenschlager, Othmar Kofler, Frank Weilbacher, Erik Popp. "Advanced and Invasive Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Techniques" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/38869 (accessed May 02, 2024).
Obermaier, M.,  Katzenschlager, S.,  Kofler, O.,  Weilbacher, F., & Popp, E. (2022, December 16). Advanced and Invasive Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Techniques. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/38869
Obermaier, Manuel, et al. "Advanced and Invasive Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Techniques." Encyclopedia. Web. 16 December, 2022.
Advanced and Invasive Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Techniques
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/jcm11247315

Despite numerous promising innovations, the chance of survival from sudden cardiac arrest has remained virtually unchanged. Technological advances have been made, user-friendly portable devices have been developed, and advanced invasive procedures have been described that could improve this unsatisfactory situation. Technical aids, such as feedback systems or automated mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) devices, can improve chest compression quality. The latter, as well as extracorporeal CPR, might serve as a bridge to treatment (with extracorporeal CPR even as a bridge to recovery). Sonography may be used to improve thoracic compressions on the one hand and to rule out potentially reversible causes of cardiac arrest on the other. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta might enhance myocardial and cerebral perfusion. Minithoracostomy, pericardiocentesis, or clamshell thoracotomy might resolve reversible causes of cardiac arrest. 

cardiac arrest sudden cardiac death emergency treatment invasive procedures heart massage circulation

1. Introduction

The cornerstones of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) have been laid in 1960 through the revolutionary principle of closed-chest cardiac massage introduced by Kouwenhoven, Jude, and Knickerbocker [1], and the pioneering works on artificial respiration by Safar [2]. Six decades later, and despite major efforts in research and all advancements in technology, little has changed in the poor prognosis of patients suffering sudden cardiac arrest [3].
In order to remedy this highly unsatisfactory situation, clinician scientists worldwide strive to enhance treatment and markedly improve survival. Some of these supposedly revolutionary treatment approaches had to be abandoned again due to lack of efficacy [4], while others are now an integral part of the international guidelines concerning CPR [5]. In addition to various educational concepts and abundant awareness campaigns which address the broad public [6], some most recent developments concerning advanced therapeutic options focus on hyperinvasive strategies and approaches [7]. It is recognized that maintaining blood pressure targets during cardiac arrest and, after the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), affects survival rates [8][9]. As Brede concisely determines in a current editorial, each “long term survival” is preceded by a ROSC and, therefore, “all potential adjunct treatments to increase the rate of ROSC should be assessed” [10].
In cases where ROSC cannot be achieved immediately, chest compression continuity and its quality are key determinants for survival in cardiac arrest [11][12]. Conventional manual chest compressions are demanding, leading to increased interruptions [13], and are insufficiently performed [14] due to rescuers’ exhaustion. Subsequently, no- and low-flow times are increasing which affects the hemodynamic situation [15]. This is considered a main determinant that prevents ROSC and, subsequently, survival due to impaired myocardial and brain perfusion [16][17].
There are several advanced and invasive techniques readily available in hospital emergency departments, which seem to stay unused in the out-of-hospital emergency setting. Consequently, in a new approach, the attempt is made to bring these techniques, devices, and qualified personnel who routinely apply these techniques in an in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) setting to patients suffering an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) [18][19].

2. Real-Time Audio or Audiovisual CPR Feedback Devices

Considerations that poor CPR quality with frequent interruptions may entail low survival rates [20][21], as previously stated, led to the development of feedback devices that are designed to measure important CPR quality parameters (i.e., compression depth, relief, frequency, and hands-off time) and give real-time audio (clickers for tactile feedback) or audiovisual feedback. This enables life support providers to continuously monitor and, when appropriate, to self-adjust their external chest compressions in real-time. Furthermore, most systems allow the users to retrospectively analyze the performance for educational purposes. Therefore, real-time feedback devices are expected to improve CPR quality and possibly patient survival [22].
Several trials report partially contradictory or ambivalent results concerning the effect of real-time feedback systems on CPR quality and patient outcome [22][23]. In addition to several observational studies, mainly from simulated training scenarios, only two RCTs could be identified. An individualized RCT and its secondary analysis evaluating an audio-only feedback device in a hospital setting found better adherence to resuscitation guidelines, as well as significantly higher rates of ROSC and survival until intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital discharge [24][25]. A large cluster RCT evaluating an audiovisual device in an out-of-hospital setting confirms the findings regarding improved CPR quality, but this was not associated with improved survival rates [26]. This result calls into question the previously assumed clinical relevance of improved chest compressions.
There seems to be sufficient objective evidence that the application of real-time audio or audiovisual feedback devices contributes to an improvement of chest compression quality and continuity, as laid down in resuscitation guidelines. In order to either confirm or refute the hypothesis that improved chest compressions actually lead to higher survival rates with favorable neurological outcomes, further well-designed, sufficiently powered, and properly conducted studies are necessary.
Nevertheless, currently, valid guidelines recommend the use of real-time audiovisual feedback devices in order to improve CPR quality as a part of a comprehensive quality improvement program [11][27].

3. Automated Mechanical CPR (mCPR)

3.1. Rationale

A large RCT, the ASPIRE trial was terminated prematurely by the data and safety monitoring board, after there was—despite similar survival rates at 4 h after the incident—a trend to impaired survival until hospital discharge and neurologic state [28]. Despite slightly distinctive definitions of ROSC, none of the other studies revealed any statistically significant different rates of ROSC at any time or sustaining ROSC until hospital admission, respectively. The CIRC trial, an RCT that compares an automated mCPR device utilizing a load-distributing band to conventional manual CPR, found a slightly diminished rate of sustaining ROSC (odds ratio (OR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73–0.96) and survival after 24 h (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.74–0.998) in the mCPR group. This observation is recouped during the stay in the hospital, as the rate of survival until hospital discharge (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.72–1.10) and neurologic state at discharge according to the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.47–1.37) do not show any statistically significant differences [29]. Two other well-conducted multi-center RCTs, the LINC trial [30] and the PARAMEDIC trial [31], found equal survival rates until hospital discharge. In the latter, this was associated with a slightly but significantly worse neurologic outcome in the intervention group receiving automated mechanical chest compressions through a vertical piston device. Adjusted OR for the risk of favorable neurologic outcome (defined as CPC 1–2) was 0.72 (95% CI 0.52–0.99) [31]. Apart from these exceptions, no statistically significant differences in survival rates and neurological outcomes were observed in any of the large RCTs [29][30][31][32]. In the as-treated analysis, the MECCA investigators found improved survival rates compared to conventional manual CPR, if the automated mCPR device utilizing a vertical piston was attached “early” during the course, viz., before moving the patient to the ambulance [32]. In all these studies, it is of key importance to consider that the results and, thereby, the conclusions of superiority or inferiority of any technique mainly depend on the quality of conventional manual CPR delivered in the respective control groups [33][34].

3.2. Significance of the Time Aspect

The observations regarding the importance of time correspond with observations from a retrospective registry analysis, where a higher rate of ROSC was found in the mechanical CPR groups, which is mainly attributable to lower risk factors among the population within this group. Compared with the predicted rate of ROSC (the ROSC after cardiac arrest (RACA) score), patients in the load-distributing band group achieved ROSC significantly more frequently (predicted 46.6%; achieved 57.1%, 95% CI 49.5–64.5%), while patients in the mechanical piston group (predicted 43.4%; achieved 46.5%, 95% CI 38.4–54.7%) and manual CPR group (predicted 39.9%; achieved 40.1%; 95% CI 39.2–41.1) only fulfilled the predicted outcome. Adjusted for epidemiologic and therapeutic factors, OR for ROSC was 1.70 (95% CI 1.12–2.57) for the load-distributing band system and 1.66 (95% CI 1.09–2.51) for the mechanical piston system [35].
The installation of automated mCPR devices may delay the time until the first defibrillation, depending on which source is consulted, for a period of up to 2.1 min [28][29][30][33]. A Cochrane review suggests that these negative impacts on CPR quality, namely lag-times until the application of the device with increased hands-off time and delay of the first defibrillation in shockable rhythms, may negate “any physiologic benefit observed in preclinical studies” [34]. Nevertheless, defibrillation is feasible and safe during ongoing automated mechanical chest compressions and, thereby, reduces the hands-off time during the later course [5][30].

3.3. Decision Criteria

Further data regarding secondary outcomes, such as long-term survival (e.g., after 1, 3, 6, or 12 months) or CPR quality surrogates (e.g., compression depth and frequency, hands-off time, injuries, blood pressure, coronary or cerebral perfusion pressures, respiratory, metabolic, and other laboratory parameters) show heterogeneous and, in parts, contradictory results. The later the endpoints, the slighter the difference between mechanical and manual CPR outcomes—a frequent observation within longitudinal resuscitation studies [33][34][36][37]. Trauma due to chest compression may occur both after conventional manual and automated mCPR in the same frequency, but the injury patterns seem to differ. Patients who received conventional manual chest compressions typically show anterior rib fractures, sternum fractures, unshaped midline chest abrasions along the sternum, visceral bleeding, and retrosternal hematoma. In contrast, patients who received automated mechanical chest compressions show posterior rib fractures, vertebral fractures, shaped skin abrasions along the anterolateral chest and shoulder, visceral bleeding including liver and splenic lacerations, and retroperitoneal hematoma [38][39][40][41].
Automated mCPR cannot reverse any cause of cardiac arrest, nor does it lead to higher survival rates compared to manual CPR. Hence, manual chest compression should be the standard technique, but under special circumstances and in particular fields of application, the devices may provide effective and safe chest compressions until an adequate health care facility is reached, where the definitive treatment can be performed. Thus, these systems may be beneficial as a bridge to treatment tool or as a bridge to decision on further treatment, and may be considered especially during prolonged resuscitation attempts. This might arise under specific conditions, such as, for example, sustaining ventricular fibrillation (VF) [42] or hypothermic cardiac arrest [42][43][44][45][46], patient transportation [5][47][48][49], diagnostics, such as computed tomography (CT) [5][50][51][52] (not chest X-rays [53]), and interventions, such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [5][50][54], fibrinolysis [52][55], dialysis [46], extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) [5], transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) [56], surgery [57][58], or organ preservation until retrieval [5][59]. On the other hand, after the implementation of mechanical CPR devices in a German EMS system, a dramatic increase in transportation with ongoing CPR, even for patients with unfavorable prognoses, has been observed [60].

3.4. Therapeutic Strategy

Thus, appropriate patients with potentially reversible and, therefore, treatable causes of cardiac arrest should be carefully identified and selected, as they might profit from transportation to a suitable hospital under ongoing automated mCPR with clear therapeutic approaches [46]. This interpretation is consistent with the manufacturers’ original intention, as laid down in the 1979 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classification report: “(…) the device is not designed to replace manual CPR. The literature seems to recommend it for certain situations (…)” [61]. Currently, valid guidelines recommend trained teams that are familiar with the device to consider automated mCPR “only if high-quality manual chest compression is not practical or compromises provider safety” [5], and under special circumstances, such as hypothermia, metabolic disorders, low cardiac output state, obesity, the need of prolonged transportation, difficult terrain, and restricted space conditions, for example, helicopter flights due to a limited cabin size [46].

4. Extra-Corporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (eCPR)

As previously stated, it is necessary to keep the low-flow time during CPR as short as possible. In the setting of an OHCA, it is essential to identify patients early who could benefit from an advanced or invasive procedure, such as extra-corporeal life support (ECLS), often synonymously referred to as extra-corporeal CPR (eCPR). As this approach involves a specialized multidisciplinary team, the decision should be made involving all parties.

4.1. Rationale

eCPR has proven to increase the chances of survival with good neurological outcomes in patients with refractory cardiac arrest treated in experienced centers by expert teams. Two randomized controlled trials demonstrated the effect of eCPR and a subsequent invasive diagnostic and treatment strategy, such as PCI. Early invasive treatment is the cornerstone of increased survival in these patients. Bělohlávek et al. demonstrated in a secondary analysis a favorable neurological outcome in 22% of patients who received eCPR, which is the same proportion as patients in the standard-of-care group. Compared with 31.5% in their intervention group, this demonstrates the effect of an early invasive treatment strategy even without eCPR [7]. A smaller phase 2 RCT, the ARREST trial, was stopped early by the DSMB, as superiority exceeded the prespecified monitoring boundary in a planned interim analysis. The survival rate in the eCPR group was significantly higher than in the control group, but the case number was too small to demonstrate benefits in neurological outcomes [62]. In a secondary analysis from the original Prague OHCA trial, Rob et al. found a significantly higher rate of survivors in patients without prehospital ROSC and eCPR compared to standard ACLS. Furthermore, a good neurological outcome (CPC 1 or 2) was only achieved by 1.2% of patients treated with standard ACLS without prehospital ROSC. This compares to 21.7% in the eCPR group and 56.6% when prehospital ROSC was achieved [63]. All studies that are assessing the effect of eCPR in patients with OHCA have a high rate of bystander CPR. Although it should not be limited to this factor, bystander CPR has been shown to be crucial in all OHCA cases [64].
Currently, there is no consensus on when eCPR should be performed. Some studies suggest that the latest decision point should be around 30 min after cardiac arrest [65]. Recent studies in Prague [7] and Denmark [66] showed a beneficial effect in patients with > 30 min of low-flow time. Furthermore, the study by Mørk et al. showed a neurologic intact survival in 20% of the patients receiving eCPR with a low-flow time of >75 min [66]. In contrast, earlier studies have shown no benefit when eCPR was initiated after 60 min of cardiac arrest [65].

4.2. Decision Criteria

As important as the optimal timing of eCPR cannulation are the decision criteria for eCPR initiation. National [67] and international [5][68] guidelines are available to answer this question. Overlapping inclusion criteria are younger age, witnessed arrest, duration of no-flow time <5 min, and time until eCPR initiation <60 min. Further criteria to consider are signs of life under CPR [69], intermittent ROSC or recurrent VF, neuroprotective circumstances, availability of cardiac arrest center with PCI capability, blood gas analysis, known diseases and, if known, the patient’s request. Signs of life under CPR were independently associated with a favorable neurological outcome. In a study analyzing 434 individuals undergoing eCPR, any sign of life before or throughout CPR was associated with an OR for a favorable neurological outcome of 7.35 (95% CI 2.71–19.97). This was further assessed for different types of signs of life, such as gasping, pupillary light reaction, and increased level of consciousness. Those signs had an OR of 1.75 (95% CI 0.95–3.21), 5.86 (95% CI 2.28–15.06), and 4.79 (95% CI 2.16–10.63), respectively. Patients with pulseless electrical activity (PEA) or asystole had a 12% (95% CI 5–25) chance of 30-day survival with CPC 1–2 when any sign of life was present. In contrast, patients without signs of life in PEA or asystole had a 0% (95% CI 0–7%) 30-day survival with CPC 1–2. This effect is also seen in patients with a shockable rhythm, where 23% (95% CI 17–30%) with any sign of life and only 4% (95% CI 1–11%) without any sign of life had a good neurological outcome, respectively [69].

4.3. Cannulation

It remains unclear which cannulation strategy is the best for eCPR in OHCA patients. Kashiura et al. demonstrated that patients who underwent eCPR cannulation with both ultrasound guidance and fluoroscopy had an independently associated lower complication rate compared to ultrasound guidance alone (adjusted OR 0.14, p = 0.024). Furthermore, the time until eCPR started was the same in both groups, with a median of 17 min [70].
This compares to a mean cannula insertion time of 22.5 ± 9.9 min when a hybrid cutdown technique is performed by non-surgeons [71]. For all three approaches, failure rates were low with a change to surgical approach in four cases (8%) if ultrasound was the only method used. The overall failure rate for the hybrid approach was as low as 7.4%.
Danial et al. assessed the impact of cannulation techniques in 814 patients. Until November 2016, all patients were cannulated using a surgical approach, while hospital policy changed in November 2016 and a percutaneous approach was used from there on. Using this retrospective data, a propensity score-matched cohort study for cannulation techniques in 532 veno-arterial ECMO patients was performed. Patients were divided into a surgical and percutaneous group, with 266 patients each. Compared to a surgical approach, percutaneous access, performed via doppler ultrasound, had a higher 30-day overall survival rate (63.8% vs. 56.3%, p = 0.034) and more vascular complications after cannula removal (14.7% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001), which mainly resulted in surgical revision for persistent bleeding. Furthermore, a lower infection rate at the cannulation site was recorded (16.5% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.001) [72].
Especially if a contralateral approach is used, the risk of arterio-arterial or veno-venous cannulation is given; this can be limited with ultrasound guidance.

4.4. Therapeutic Strategy

Similar to automated mCPR, eCPR should not be considered a definitive treatment in cardiac arrest, but as a bridge to decision or bridge to treatment while organ perfusion (particularly cerebral and coronary) is maintained. Moreover, eCPR might have the potential to serve as a bridge to recovery. Again, it is crucial to identify patients with potentially reversible entities of cardiac arrest who might profit from this invasive treatment; for example, therapy-refractory ventricular fibrillation or severe hypothermia. In-depth expertise is essential for the implementation of this measure, which requires comprehensive technical and non-technical skills and correspondingly high case numbers at the institutions providing the training. In addition to human resources, the receiving hospital must also have the equipment and capacity for this highly critical patient population. Moreover, it requires a system with highly skilled care providers, as well as the equipment and capacity necessary to provide adequate continuing care for patients.
In addition, eCPR might also serve as a bridge to donation. Although this should never be the main purpose of initiation, it can be a secondary benefit to others when, despite the best effort, ECMO weaning is not possible or severe brain damage has already occurred.

5. Sonography

5.1. Optimisation of Chest Compressions

High-quality chest compression is the cornerstone in the treatment of each cardiac arrest case. The “middle of the chest” has been proven to be an unreliable place when the left ventricle (LV) should be compressed [73][74][75]. One approach would be to continuously assess the capnography waveform and change hand positions based on three pre-defined positions.
As this “blind” approach can be time-consuming and waveform capnography can be impaired due to various circumstances, such as the underlying pathology, echocardiography during CPR is a powerful tool for the detection of the area of maximal compression (AMC), and following the optimization of chest compression.
Although availability can be limited, the TOE probe can be inserted during ongoing chest compressions. Assessment of the AMC is performed in the midoesophageal 4-chamber view (ME4CH) and the midoesophageal long axis (MELAX). As soon as the AMC is identified over the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) or the right ventricle (RV) (Video S1), hand positioning should be optimized. Continuous assessment of the AMC is now possible while maintaining high-quality chest compressions.
Blaivas described the performance of TOE under CPR in 2008 with a case series from an emergency department highlighting the benefits of continuous chest compressions while seeking reversible causes that led to cardiac arrest [76].

5.2. Detecting and Addressing Reversible Causes of Cardiac Arrest

Hypovolaemia: In traumatic cardiac arrest, hypovolaemia due to exsanguination is one of the most common reversible causes, and invasive therapeutic options are available. In order to enhance certainty before performing invasive interventions, the eFAST protocol can be applied to detect free abdominal or thoracic fluid. Venous congestion during CPR can limit the significance of inferior vena cava (IVC) assessment. Current guidelines state limited knowledge about the use of ultrasound for the detection of hypovolemia in cardiac arrest [5][27].
Thromboembolism: Thrombosis, either cardiac or pulmonary, is one of the most frequent causes of sudden cardiac death. As PE has non-specific clinical signs and symptoms that may lead to PEA, it is crucial to look for specific echocardiographic signs before the patient further deteriorates [77][78]. Therefore, visual assessment should be the main priority, as this can be performed in every setting with a handheld ultrasound device.
In patients with cardiac arrest, RV dilation is a common finding, especially if resuscitation has been ongoing for a prolonged period [79]. This weak association between RV dilation and PE brings a challenge to the table, leaving only reduced possibilities of identifying PE during CPR. Right heart mobile thrombus could be seen during CPR, suggesting the presence of PE [78]. A second finding, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), can be detected in about 30–50% of patients with PE by compression ultrasound [80].
While the need for emergent ultrasound diagnostics is not given in shockable rhythms, it may provide valuable information in peri-arrest situations or following ROSC, if a 12-lead electrocardiogram is inconclusive. Regional wall motion abnormalities can be seen even in patients without significant repolarisation abnormalities.
Tension pneumothorax: Ultrasound is not only faster than conventional chest X-rays or CT—it also offers better sensitivity and specificity than chest X-rays. In addition, it can be performed directly at the site of emergency [81] if the “classical” diagnostic means are uncertain.
Pericardial tamponade: A pericardial effusion was previously considered only a suspected diagnosis in the out-of-hospital setting, which could not be ruled out with certainty. With the increasing availability of portable ultrasound equipment, even users with little experience can answer the question of the presence of a pericardial effusion using the eFAST or FEEL protocol in the field [82].

6. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA)

6.1. Achieving Hemostasis in Severe Trauma and Traumatic Cardiac Arrest (TCA)

As previously stated, REBOA is used to control bleeding from non-compressible injuries in critically injured casualties with uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock unresponsive to volume therapy [83]. Depending on the underlying trauma, the balloon occlusion may be deployed either in landing zone I (thoracic and upper abdominal bleeding and aortic dissection) or III (sub-/pelvic or grain bleeding) [84].
As this special issue’s focus is on sudden cardiac death rather than TCA, the application of REBOA in catastrophic bleeding is only briefly mentioned due to historic and didactic reasons. Pertinent literature might be of interest for further reading [83][84][85].

6.2. Improving Coronary Perfusion during CPR

When applied in trauma patients, the aortic occlusion substantially increased blood pressure which was expected to result in increased cerebral and coronary perfusion. Consistently, it is alleged that the REBOA procedure might have an epinephrine-like effect on aortic and subsequently coronary pressures [10]. As previously stated, those are associated with improved rates of ROSC and survival [17]. In order to enhance cardiac and cerebral perfusion pressures during CPR, the REBOA catheter should be placed in landing zone I.
As a matter of fact, the first experimental studies confirmed enhanced coronary and cerebral perfusion after performing the REBOA procedure in a porcine cardiac arrest model [86]. On this occasion, the effects on both perfusion pressures and ROSC are comparable to those achieved from the application of epinephrine [86]. For a long time, merely case reports and observational studies were published reporting that REBOA is feasible and effective in non-trauma cardiac arrest [87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94]. The clinical studies predominantly lack control groups and are limited to surrogate outcomes, but support the physiological considerations on perfusion as previously described [92][93][94][95]. Hence, REBOA is increasingly seen as an adjunct to non-trauma advanced cardiac life support. If performed rapidly by a highly skilled team from an experienced center, enabling a short collapse-to-balloon time, it might serve as a bridge to treatment until PCI or ECMO [96].
In a randomized controlled feasibility study, a team from Heidelberg University Hospital examines the value of a REBOA device in non-trauma cardiac arrest. In addition to its safety and performance, secondary outcome measures and surrogate parameters such as blood pressure, CPR time intervals, and ROSC are of the investigators’ particular interest [NCT05146661]. The currently ongoing multi-center randomized controlled REBOARREST trial is supposed to provide insight into survival, hemodynamics, organ function, and adverse events [97].

7. Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) Analysis

Point-of-care testing (POCT), similar to ABG analysis, is widely used in both intensive care medicine and emergency departments, as the knowledge of particular blood parameters may require further therapeutic procedures in the treatment of life-threatening conditions. Therefore, it is considered a common adjunct to the treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrest [5][46]. Beyond differentiating respiratory disorders, further, potentially reversible causes of cardiac arrest may be detected and treated by means of ABG analysis; for example, metabolic disorders, such as acidosis and alkalosis, as well as electrolyte abnormalities, such as hypo or hyperkalemia. The measurement results may trigger interventions such as the optimization of artificial respiration, the correction of acidosis (ventilatory or sodium bicarbonate), antidote, vasoactive, or fluid therapy, or may accelerate admission to the hospital for resuscitative hemodialysis [98][99].
Due to the size, energy demand, and characteristics of the analytical equipment, even if measured at the “point of care”, most POCT applications had been restricted to health care facilities. With the advent of portable devices, blood gas analyzers have become available in the field [100][101]. Meanwhile, technological advances have enabled a rapid and reliable application in the prehospital environment [98].
The parameters obtained may support the responsible team in diagnosis and treatment decision-making [98][99]. While survival data from RCTs are still missing, it seems obvious that patients might profit from the earliest possible recognition and treatment of reversible causes during OHCA [102].

8. Thoracic Decompression

In addition to chest trauma as a main cause, pulmonary diseases, such as acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with consecutive pneumothorax, may be accompanied by progressive ventilatory and/or cardiocirculatory distress [103]. There is a risk of developing a life-threatening tension pneumothorax, which can be fatal if left untreated. Needle decompression and thoracostomy with or without drainage insertion are, therefore, life-saving interventions. The relief of tension pneumothorax by means of pleural puncture or minithoracostomy is an established invasive procedure. It is one of the basic techniques in the care of critically ill patients and every doctor working in emergency medicine must be able to perform it [82][104].
In highly dynamic situations with foudroyant shock, needle decompression is useful, as it is quick and easy to perform. Classically, it is performed in the Monaldi position in the second or third intercostal space of the midclavicular line. The indwelling venous cannulae often used for needle decompression are too short to reach the pleural space for a relevant proportion of patients [105][106].
A tension pneumothorax can usually only be relieved for a short time with the puncture, so it seems sensible to always perform a minithoracostomy afterward [107]. The minithoracostomy is performed in the Bülau position. The life-saving intervention is the opening of the pleural space, not the insertion of a drain. Whether a chest drain should be inserted at the scene or in the hospital remains the subject of ongoing debate. Recent retrospective data suggest that there could be an increased risk of recurrent tension physiology if thoracostomy is not followed by the placement of a drain [108].

9. Pericardiocentesis

While chronic pericardial effusion, for example, due to infectious, inflammatory, or malignant disease, usually develops slowly, rapid accumulation in the event of a disease flare-up can lead to subacute cardiocirculatory decompensation. In the event of aortic dissection, after thoracic trauma or iatrogenic perforation (for example, PCI, aortic, or cardiac surgery), the development is dramatic. Even small amounts of blood can lead to a significant increase in intrapericardial pressure within a few minutes and clinically manifest pericardial tamponade [109].
Clinical diagnosis of pericardial tamponade (Beck’s Triad: hypotension with a narrowed pulse pressure, jugular venous distention, and muffled heart sounds) is difficult and unreliable, especially in a peri-arrest situation. As acute tamponade is not associated with a large effusion volume, a rather small effusion of 50 mL can cause cardiac tamponade in a hypovolemic state and lead to cardiac arrest. This reversible cause has to be treated immediately in order to restore perfusion. In this case, prehospital emergency ultrasonography is essential [109][110]. Furthermore, the integration of ultrasound reduces the time until relief of the pericardial tamponade [111].
In principle, two phenotypes of tamponade can be distinguished sonographically. On the one hand, a liquid tamponade is easily accessible for puncture; on the other hand, extensive clot formation can occur in the case of a hemopericardium. In the latter case, relief by pericardiocentesis is not promising and relief must be achieved by thoracotomy, as described below [46][107][109].
It must be mentioned restrictively that, to date, there is no systematic data available regarding the cause of cardiac tamponade in non-traumatic cardiac arrest. If the cardiac arrest was caused by aortic dissection or ventricular rupture, simply relieving tamponade could not solve the problem, as the underlying pathology cannot be treated with the options available in an out-of-hospital setting.

10. Resuscitative Thoracotomy

The resuscitative opening of the chest by means of a clamshell thoracotomy provides a quick overview and allows control of intrathoracic bleeding, proximal aortic compression, and access to the pericardium in cases of suspected or ultrasound-confirmed tamponade [82][112][113]. Therefore, it is indicated in traumatic cardiac arrest rather than sudden cardiac death. Nevertheless, this procedure is supposed to be discussed here as an advanced invasive resuscitation technique for the sake of completeness. As an invasive emergency technique, thoracotomy is firmly established in the current guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and polytrauma care, although the indication must be restrictive. According to the “4 E” rule, clamshell thoracotomy is only indicated if certain conditions concerning expertise, equipment, environment, and elapsed time are met [46].
Compared to left anterolateral thoracotomy, clamshell thoracotomy is more suitable for potentially reversible causes of trauma-induced cardiovascular arrest. It allows an excellent overview of the intrathoracic organs and thus a wide range of interventions [112].

11. Discussion of Concepts and Strategies

With the increasing establishment of advanced and invasive techniques in ALS, procedures may now potentially be considered in medical circulatory arrest whose applications were previously limited to traumatic cardiac arrest or trauma life support. This could make the boundaries of indications appear increasingly blurred.

11.1. Decision-Making and Timing

Advanced and invasive techniques may have a positive impact on survival but can be fraught with technical, social, situational, and organizational hurdles. Therefore, it is important that the emergency crew knows the infrastructure, with its highly qualified and skilled teams, and can deploy resources that can respond to this time-critical emergency within minutes. Here, the geographical and health characteristics of the different urban and rural areas must also be considered [114].
Time plays a major role in the context of OHCA. Ideally, and in terms of survival with good neurological outcome, the low-flow time should not be greater than 60 min [115][116]. This presents a major challenge to emergency teams. A lot of information has to be filtered in a short time and a decision has to be made for or against a resource-intensive attempt to help. Even if the local conditions provide all technical and personnel resources, the process is significantly influenced by the decisions of the team on site. A predefined decision point or mental model can have a major impact on the stressful teamwork, the further course of resuscitation, and the survival of the patient.
For teamwork to succeed resiliently and function efficiently, mental models can be helpful. Emergency teams should use and implement mental models even before the emergency. This can establish a clear decision tree, streamline processes, and expedite decisions (for example, a mental model for refractory cardiopulmonary resuscitation in OHCA) [117].
The decision point is a formal team time-out to plan the next 60 min, maximize the use of team resources, and anticipate procedures. At this point, brief considerations should be verbalized in the scenario, decided interprofessionally, and initiated immediately.
Taking eCPR as an example, after the second rhythm analysis, or after intubation, the team decides loudly and unanimously that, based on the information available, eCPR is indicated and the cannulation team can be dispatched. As Tonna and colleagues conclude, due to limited data, much of the current practice is based on expert opinion and institutional knowledge, rather than scientific evidence [114]. Depending on the local strategy, whether the cannulation is in- or out-of-hospital, once reversible causes have been ruled out, preparation for cannulation or transport to the hospital follows. If the cannulation is attempted in-hospital, the decision to proceed with eCPR must be reconsidered by the receiving team [118]. As a result of rapid decision making, time-intensive steps can be taken early and conditions can be created for eCPR to begin in less than 60 min [119]. This example highlights the importance of timing in this process and how decision-making impacts patient survival.
Awareness of the right timing and early activation of advanced procedures are imperative to lead to the reduction in low-flow times and should be included in local standard operating procedures (SOPs). Mental models for rare events and a decision point as a trigger in the resuscitation algorithm could support the processes.
Before highly invasive techniques are carried out, a short team briefing should take place in order to give all those involved in the operation the opportunity to “take themselves out of the situation” if they fear that they will be too emotionally burdened by the procedures. After the response, a structured team debriefing is a valuable educational strategy to improve team performance [120]. While the effect of debriefing on long-term patient outcomes is uncertain, there is evidence that structured debriefing improves clinical education, the efficiency of work, team climate, and patient safety [121][122][123]. Teams with alternating compositions, which is typical for emergency medicine, benefit most from structured debriefing [123]. Especially after stressful emergency responses, a structured and—if necessary, moderated—reappraisal and debriefing should also be offered for all personnel involved in a protected setting [124]. Early signs and support for stress reactions should also be made a subject of discussion.

11.2. Emergency Response and Continuing Care Structures

A promising approach to bring the therapeutic options previously described to the roadside is rapid response vehicles staffed with an experienced emergency physician. There are some proven concepts, such as London’s air ambulance, which operates an advanced trauma team helicopter and a rapid response car during night time or in adverse weather or rather flight conditions [18]. Heidelberg University Hospital also operates a rapid response vehicle providing devices and experienced staff for invasive interventions, the “medical intervention car (MIC)” [19]. Utilizing both modes, rapid response cars and rescue helicopters, appears reasonable, as this concept will combine the advantages of a highly flexible system within the narrow spaces of a city with a system that allows for the deploying of the techniques quickly over long distances to rural areas.
Invasive procedures may be associated with relevant blood loss due to the intervention itself (e.g., ECMO and thoracotomy) or the underlying mechanism (e.g., trauma or aortic dissection) leading to cardiac arrest. In addition to bleeding control, volume replacement plays a central role. It is questionable whether a patient can be stabilized with crystalloid or colloid infusion solutions alone in the case of massive blood loss. While blood transfusion in an out-of-hospital setting was unimaginable in large parts of the world until recently, blood products are now increasingly available on the scene [19][46][125][126][127][128].
Embedding the algorithm on advanced and invasive procedures in local care structures is essential to ensure adequate continuing care for critically ill patients. This begins with raising public awareness programs for lay resuscitation. Receiving hospitals must have the necessary human, medical, and technical resources to ensure a seamless continuation of treatment and manage any complications that may arise, which is the case with cardiac arrest centers (CAC).

12. Conclusions

Despite all innovations, situation awareness, continuous training of technical and non-technical skills, and proper (effective and continuous) chest compressions, the earliest possible defibrillation and artificial respiration remain the basic framework of CPR.
Ultrasound under CPR is increasingly becoming a key skill for the evaluation of reversible causes of cardiac arrest, optimizing chest compressions and evaluating the hemodynamic situation after obtaining sustained ROSC.
For selected patient groups, under certain circumstances and, in particular, fields of application, advanced and invasive techniques may be an option to ensure sufficient organ (in particular, coronary and cerebral) perfusion. There is a lack of clear evidence regarding solid endpoints, such as survival. Hence, these techniques should only be conducted with clear therapeutic conceptions as a bridge to treatment by a specialist team.
This should be part of a larger treatment concept that requires appropriate emergency response systems, as well as definitive treatment in centers with established continuing care structures.
The decisions and timing made by the emergency team have a major impact on the time-critical scenario. Therefore, it is essential that emergency teams know and use local resources, establish mental models for rare emergencies, and set decision points as triggers that initiate processes early.

References

  1. Kouwenhoven, W.B.; Jude, J.R.; Knickerbocker, G.G. Closed-chest cardiac massage. JAMA 1960, 173, 1064–1067.
  2. Safar, P. Artificial Respitation. Anesthesiology 1960, 21, 570.
  3. Gräsner, J.-T.; Herlitz, J.; Tjelmeland, I.B.M.; Wnent, J.; Masterson, S.; Lilja, G.; Bein, B.; Böttiger, B.W.; Rosell-Ortiz, F.; Nolan, J.P.; et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Epidemiology of cardiac arrest in Europe. Resuscitation 2021, 161, 61–79.
  4. Chamberlain, D. Never Quite There: A tale of Resuscitation Medicine. Resuscitation 2004, 60, 3–11.
  5. Soar, J.; Bottiger, B.W.; Carli, P.; Couper, K.; Deakin, C.D.; Djarv, T.; Lott, C.; Olasveengen, T.; Paal, P.; Pellis, T.; et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation 2021, 161, 115–151.
  6. Rott, N.; Bottiger, B.W.; Lockey, A. The World Restart a Heart Initiative: How to save hundreds of thousands of lives worldwide. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 2021, 27, 663–667.
  7. Bělohlávek, J.; Smalcova, J.; Rob, D.; Franek, O.; Smid, O.; Pokorna, M.; Horak, J.; Mrazek, V.; Kovarnik, T.; Zemanek, D.; et al. Effect of Intra-arrest Transport, Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, and Immediate Invasive Assessment and Treatment on Functional Neurologic Outcome in Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2022, 327, 737–747.
  8. Bouhemad, B.; Brisson, H.; Le-Guen, M.; Arbelot, C.; Lu, Q.; Rouby, J.J. Bedside ultrasound assessment of positive end-expiratory pressure-induced lung recruitment. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011, 183, 341–347.
  9. O'Brien, C.E.; Santos, P.T.; Reyes, M.; Adams, S.; Hopkins, C.D.; Kulikowicz, E.; Hamrick, J.L.; Hamrick, J.T.; Lee, J.K.; Kudchadkar, S.R.; et al. Association of diastolic blood pressure with survival during paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2019, 143, 50–56.
  10. Brede, J.R. Aortic occlusion during cardiac arrest-mechanical adrenaline? Resuscitation 2022, 179, 94–96.
  11. Olasveengen, T.M.; Semeraro, F.; Ristagno, G.; Castren, M.; Handley, A.; Kuzovlev, A.; Monsieurs, K.G.; Raffay, V.; Smyth, M.; Soar, J.; et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Basic Life Support. Resuscitation 2021, 161, 98–114.
  12. Nichol, G.; Thomas, E.; Callaway, C.W.; Hedges, J.; Powell, J.L.; Aufderheide, T.P.; Rea, T.; Lowe, R.; Brown, T.; Dreyer, J.; et al. Regional variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and outcome. JAMA 2008, 300, 1423–1431.
  13. Valenzuela, T.D.; Kern, K.B.; Clark, L.L.; Berg, R.A.; Berg, M.D.; Berg, D.D.; Hilwig, R.W.; Otto, C.W.; Newburn, D.; Ewy, G.A. Interruptions of chest compressions during emergency medical systems resuscitation. Circulation 2005, 112, 1259–1265.
  14. Ochoa, F.J.; Ramalle-Gomara, E.; Lisa, V.; Saralegui, I. The effect of rescuer fatigue on the quality of chest compressions. Resuscitation 1998, 37, 149–152.
  15. Eftestol, T.; Sunde, K.; Steen, P.A. Effects of interrupting precordial compressions on the calculated probability of defibrillation success during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 2002, 105, 2270–2273.
  16. Christenson, J.; Andrusiek, D.; Everson-Stewart, S.; Kudenchuk, P.; Hostler, D.; Powell, J.; Callaway, C.W.; Bishop, D.; Vaillancourt, C.; Davis, D.; et al. Chest compression fraction determines survival in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. Circulation 2009, 120, 1241–1247.
  17. Paradis, N.A.; Martin, G.B.; Rivers, E.P.; Goetting, M.G.; Appleton, T.J.; Feingold, M.; Nowak, R.M. Coronary perfusion pressure and the return of spontaneous circulation in human cardiopulmonary resuscitation. JAMA 1990, 263, 1106–1113.
  18. Rehn, M.; Davies, G.; Smith, P.; Lockey, D.J. Structure of Rapid Response Car Operations in an Urban Trauma Service. Air Med. J. 2016, 35, 143–147.
  19. Obermaier, M.; Fiedler, M.O.; Göring, M.; Hochreiter, M.; Küßner, T.; Mohr, S.; Popp, E.; Schmitt, F.C.F.; Weigand, M.A.; Weilbacher, F.; et al. Medical Intervention Car: Projekt zur Verbesserung der außerklinischen Notfallversorgung. In Elsevier Emergency: Innovative Konzepte; Gollwitzer, J., Grusnick, H.-M., Klausmeier, M., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 18–24.
  20. Lukas, R.P.; Gräsner, J.T.; Seewald, S.; Lefering, R.; Weber, T.P.; Van Aken, H.; Fischer, M.; Bohn, A. Chest compression quality management and return of spontaneous circulation: A matched-pair registry study. Resuscitation 2012, 83, 1212–1218.
  21. Brouwer, T.F.; Walker, R.G.; Chapman, F.W.; Koster, R.W. Association Between Chest Compression Interruptions and Clinical Outcomes of Ventricular Fibrillation Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Circulation 2015, 132, 1030–1037.
  22. Gugelmin-Almeida, D.; Tobase, L.; Polastri, T.F.; Peres, H.H.C.; Timerman, S. Do automated real-time feedback devices improve CPR quality? A systematic review of literature. Resusc. Plus 2021, 6, 100108.
  23. Wang, S.A.; Su, C.P.; Fan, H.Y.; Hou, W.H.; Chen, Y.C. Effects of real-time feedback on cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality on outcomes in adult patients with cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation 2020, 155, 82–90.
  24. Goharani, R.; Vahedian-Azimi, A.; Farzanegan, B.; Bashar, F.R.; Hajiesmaeili, M.; Shojaei, S.; Madani, S.J.; Gohari-Moghaddam, K.; Hatamian, S.; Mosavinasab, S.M.M.; et al. Real-time compression feedback for patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest: A multi-center randomized controlled clinical trial. J. Intensive Care 2019, 7, 5.
  25. Goharani, R.; Vahedian-Azimi, A.; Pourhoseingholi, M.A.; Amanpour, F.; Rosano, G.M.C.; Sahebkar, A. Survival to intensive care unit discharge among in-hospital cardiac arrest patients by applying audiovisual feedback device. ESC Heart Fail. 2021, 8, 4652–4660.
  26. Hostler, D.; Everson-Stewart, S.; Rea, T.D.; Stiell, I.G.; Callaway, C.W.; Kudenchuk, P.J.; Sears, G.K.; Emerson, S.S.; Nichol, G.; Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium, I. Effect of real-time feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation outside hospital: Prospective, cluster-randomised trial. Br. Med. J. 2011, 342, d512.
  27. Wyckoff, M.H.; Greif, R.; Morley, P.T.; Ng, K.C.; Olasveengen, T.M.; Singletary, E.M.; Soar, J.; Cheng, A.; Drennan, I.R.; Liley, H.G.; et al. 2022 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces. Resuscitation 2022.
  28. Hallstrom, A.; Rea, T.D.; Sayre, M.R.; Christenson, J.; Anton, A.R.; Mosesso, V.N., Jr.; Van Ottingham, L.; Olsufka, M.; Pennington, S.; White, L.J.; et al. Manual chest compression vs use of an automated chest compression device during resuscitation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A randomized trial. JAMA 2006, 295, 2620–2628.
  29. Wik, L.; Olsen, J.A.; Persse, D.; Sterz, F.; Lozano, M., Jr.; Brouwer, M.A.; Westfall, M.; Souders, C.M.; Malzer, R.; van Grunsven, P.M.; et al. Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial. Resuscitation 2014, 85, 741–748.
  30. Rubertsson, S.; Lindgren, E.; Smekal, D.; Ostlund, O.; Silfverstolpe, J.; Lichtveld, R.A.; Boomars, R.; Ahlstedt, B.; Skoog, G.; Kastberg, R.; et al. Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: The LINC randomized trial. JAMA 2014, 311, 53–61.
  31. Perkins, G.D.; Lall, R.; Quinn, T.; Deakin, C.D.; Cooke, M.W.; Horton, J.; Lamb, S.E.; Slowther, A.M.; Woollard, M.; Carson, A.; et al. Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): A pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015, 385, 947–955.
  32. Anantharaman, V.; Ng, B.L.; Ang, S.H.; Lee, C.Y.; Leong, S.H.; Ong, M.E.; Chua, S.J.; Rabind, A.C.; Anjali, N.B.; Hao, Y. Prompt use of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: The MECCA study report. Singapore Med. J. 2017, 58, 424–431.
  33. Obermaier, M. Stellenwert von Kardiokompressionssystemen in der außer- und innerklinischen Reanimation: Eine retrospektive Registeranalyse und prospektive Metaanalyse. Ph.D. Thesis, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Ulm, Open Access Repositorium of Ulm University (OPARU), Ulm, Germany, 2018.
  34. Wang, P.L.; Brooks, S.C. Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018, 8, CD007260.
  35. Seewald, S.; Obermaier, M.; Lefering, R.; Bohn, A.; Georgieff, M.; Muth, C.-M.; Gräsner, J.-T.; Masterson, S.; Scholz, J.; Wnent, J. Application of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation devices and their value in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective analysis of the German Resuscitation Registry. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0208113.
  36. Obermaier, M.; Zimmermann, J.B.; Popp, E.; Weigand, M.A.; Weiterer, S.; Dinse-Lambracht, A.; Muth, C.-M.; Nußbaum, B.L.; Gräsner, J.-T.; Seewald, S.; et al. Automated mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation devices versus manual chest compression in the treatment of cardiac arrest: Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing machine to human. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e042062.
  37. Chiang, C.Y.; Lim, K.C.; Lai, P.C.; Tsai, T.Y.; Huang, Y.T.; Tsai, M.J. Comparison between Prehospital Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Devices and Manual CPR for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1448.
  38. Obermaier, M.; Schramm, C. LUCAS® leaving its footprints during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Vis. J. Emerg. Med. 2019, 17, 100666.
  39. Obermaier, M.; Do, T.D. Hemodynamically Relevant Intrathoracic Bleeding Following CPR: Case Report on Resuscitation-associated Injury to Intercostal Arteries with the Need for Transcatheter Arterial Embolization. Notarzt. 2022.
  40. Ondruschka, B.; Baier, C.; Bayer, R.; Hammer, N.; Dressler, J.; Bernhard, M. Chest compression-associated injuries in cardiac arrest patients treated with manual chest compressions versus automated chest compression devices (LUCAS II) - a forensic autopsy-based comparison. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 2018, 14, 515–525.
  41. Ondruschka, B.; Baier, C.; Bernhard, M.; Buschmann, C.; Dressler, J.; Schlote, J.; Zwirner, J.; Hammer, N. Frequency and intensity of pulmonary bone marrow and fat embolism due to manual or automated chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 2019, 15, 48–55.
  42. Risom, M.; Jorgensen, H.; Rasmussen, L.S.; Sorensen, A.M. Resuscitation, prolonged cardiac arrest, and an automated chest compression device. J. Emerg. Med. 2010, 38, 481–483.
  43. Paal, P.; Brugger, H.; Boyd, J. Accidental hypothermia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 682.
  44. Holmstrom, P.; Boyd, J.; Sorsa, M.; Kuisma, M. A case of hypothermic cardiac arrest treated with an external chest compression device (LUCAS) during transport to re-warming. Resuscitation 2005, 67, 139–141.
  45. Wik, L.; Kiil, S. Use of an automatic mechanical chest compression device (LUCAS) as a bridge to establishing cardiopulmonary bypass for a patient with hypothermic cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2005, 66, 391–394.
  46. Lott, C.; Truhlar, A.; Alfonzo, A.; Barelli, A.; Gonzalez-Salvado, V.; Hinkelbein, J.; Nolan, J.P.; Paal, P.; Perkins, G.D.; Thies, K.C.; et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Cardiac arrest in special circumstances. Resuscitation 2021, 161, 152–219.
  47. Gässler, H.; Ventzke, M.M.; Lampl, L.; Helm, M. Transport with ongoing resuscitation: A comparison between manual and mechanical compression. Emerg. Med. J. 2013, 30, 589–592.
  48. Ventzke, M.M.; Gassler, H.; Lampl, L.; Helm, M. Cardio pump reloaded: In-hospital resuscitation during transport. Intern Emerg. Med. 2013, 8, 621–626.
  49. Gässler, H.; Kümmerle, S.; Ventzke, M.M.; Lampl, L.; Helm, M. Mechanical chest compression: An alternative in helicopter emergency medical services? Intern Emerg. Med. 2015, 10, 715–720.
  50. Bonnemeier, H.; Simonis, G.; Olivecrona, G.; Weidtmann, B.; Gotberg, M.; Weitz, G.; Gerling, I.; Strasser, R.; Frey, N. Continuous mechanical chest compression during in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation of patients with pulseless electrical activity. Resuscitation 2011, 82, 155–159.
  51. Wirth, S.; Korner, M.; Treitl, M.; Linsenmaier, U.; Leidel, B.A.; Jaschkowitz, T.; Reiser, M.F.; Kanz, K.G. Computed tomography during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using automated chest compression devices—An initial study. Eur. Radiol. 2009, 19, 1857–1866.
  52. Schubert, E.C.; Kanz, K.G.; Linsenmaier, U.; Bogner, V.; Wirth, S.; Angstwurm, M. Use of computed tomography and mechanical CPR in cardiac arrest to confirm pulmonary embolism: A case study. CJEM 2016, 18, 66–69.
  53. Agarwala, R.; Barber, R. A pitfall of Autopulse. Anaesthesia 2011, 66, 142–143.
  54. Wagner, H.; Terkelsen, C.J.; Friberg, H.; Harnek, J.; Kern, K.; Lassen, J.F.; Olivecrona, G.K. Cardiac arrest in the catheterisation laboratory: A 5-year experience of using mechanical chest compressions to facilitate PCI during prolonged resuscitation efforts. Resuscitation 2010, 81, 383–387.
  55. Weiss, A.; Frisch, C.; Hornung, R.; Baubin, M.; Lederer, W. A retrospective analysis of fibrinolytic and adjunctive antithrombotic treatment during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 24095.
  56. Satler, L.F.; Pichard, A.D. The use of automated chest compression for arrest during TAVI. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2013, 82, 849–850.
  57. Vatsgar, T.T.; Ingebrigtsen, O.; Fjose, L.O.; Wikstrom, B.; Nilsen, J.E.; Wik, L. Cardiac arrest and resuscitation with an automatic mechanical chest compression device (LUCAS) due to anaphylaxis of a woman receiving caesarean section because of pre-eclampsia. Resuscitation 2006, 68, 155–159.
  58. Dumans-Nizard, V.; Fischler, M. Intraoperative use of an automated chest compression device. Anesthesiology 2011, 114, 1253–1255.
  59. Wind, J.; Hoogland, E.R.; van Heurn, L.W. Preservation techniques for donors after cardiac death kidneys. Curr. Opin. Organ. Transplant. 2011, 16, 157–161.
  60. Gräsner, J.-T.; Jantzen, T.; Cavus, E.; Gries, A.; Breckwoldt, J.; Böttiger, B.W.; Bein, B.; Dörges, V.; Fischer, M.; Messelken, M.; et al. Neuheiten aus Ausbildung und Lehre, Grundlagenforschung, klinischen Studien und Qualitätsmanagement. 4. Wissenschafttliche Arbeitstage Notfallmedizin 2008 in Kiel. Anästhesiologie Intensivmed. 2008, 49, 679.
  61. FDA. U.S. Food & Drug Administration Website. Available online: www.fda.gov (accessed on 27 July 2022).
  62. Yannopoulos, D.; Bartos, J.; Raveendran, G.; Walser, E.; Connett, J.; Murray, T.A.; Collins, G.; Zhang, L.; Kalra, R.; Kosmopoulos, M.; et al. Advanced reperfusion strategies for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and refractory ventricular fibrillation (ARREST): A phase 2, single centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2020, 396, 1807–1816.
  63. Rob, D.; Smalcova, J.; Smid, O.; Kral, A.; Kovarnik, T.; Zemanek, D.; Kavalkova, P.; Huptych, M.; Komarek, A.; Franek, O.; et al. Extracorporeal versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A secondary analysis of the Prague OHCA trial. Crit. Care 2022, 26, 330.
  64. Grasner, J.T.; Wnent, J.; Herlitz, J.; Perkins, G.D.; Lefering, R.; Tjelmeland, I.; Koster, R.W.; Masterson, S.; Rossell-Ortiz, F.; Maurer, H.; et al. Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Europe - Results of the EuReCa TWO study. Resuscitation 2020, 148, 218–226.
  65. Wengenmayer, T.; Rombach, S.; Ramshorn, F.; Biever, P.; Bode, C.; Duerschmied, D.; Staudacher, D.L. Influence of low-flow time on survival after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR). Crit. Care 2017, 21, 157.
  66. Mørk, S.R.; Bøtker, M.T.; Christensen, S.; Tang, M.; Terkelsen, C.J. Survival and neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with and without mechanical circulatory support. Resusc. Plus 2022, 10, 100230.
  67. AWMF. S3-Leitlinie 011/021: Einsatz der extrakorporalen Zirkulation (ECLS/ECMO) bei Herz- und Kreislaufversagen; Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF): Berlin, Germany, 2020.
  68. Richardson, A.S.C.; Tonna, J.E.; Nanjayya, V.; Nixon, P.; Abrams, D.C.; Raman, L.; Bernard, S.; Finney, S.J.; Grunau, B.; Youngquist, S.T.; et al. Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Adults. Interim Guideline Consensus Statement From the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. Asaio J. 2021, 67, 221–228.
  69. Debaty, G.; Lamhaut, L.; Aubert, R.; Nicol, M.; Sanchez, C.; Chavanon, O.; Bouzat, P.; Durand, M.; Vanzetto, G.; Hutin, A.; et al. Prognostic value of signs of life throughout cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2021, 162, 163–170.
  70. Kashiura, M.; Sugiyama, K.; Tanabe, T.; Akashi, A.; Hamabe, Y. Effect of ultrasonography and fluoroscopic guidance on the incidence of complications of cannulation in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective observational study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017, 17, 4.
  71. Lamhaut, L.; Hutin, A.; Dagron, C.; Baud, F.; An, K.; Carli, P. A new hybrid technique for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for use by nonsurgeons. Emergencias 2021, 33, 156–157.
  72. Danial, P.; Hajage, D.; Nguyen, L.S.; Mastroianni, C.; Demondion, P.; Schmidt, M.; Bougle, A.; Amour, J.; Leprince, P.; Combes, A.; et al. Percutaneous versus surgical femoro-femoral veno-arterial ECMO: A propensity score matched study. Intensive Care Med. 2018, 44, 2153–2161.
  73. Nestaas, S.; Stensæth, K.H.; Rosseland, V.; Kramer-Johansen, J. Radiological assessment of chest compression point and achievable compression depth in cardiac patients. Scand. J. Trauma Resusc. Emerg. Med. 2016, 24, 54.
  74. Pickard, A.; Darby, M.; Soar, J. Radiological assessment of the adult chest: Implications for chest compressions. Resuscitation 2006, 71, 387–390.
  75. Shin, J.; Rhee, J.E.; Kim, K. Is the inter-nipple line the correct hand position for effective chest compression in adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation? Resuscitation 2007, 75, 305–310.
  76. Blaivas, M. Transesophageal echocardiography during cardiopulmonary arrest in the emergency department. Resuscitation 2008, 78, 135–140.
  77. Pruszczyk, P.; Goliszek, S.; Lichodziejewska, B.; Kostrubiec, M.; Ciurzynski, M.; Kurnicka, K.; Dzikowska-Diduch, O.; Palczewski, P.; Wyzgal, A. Prognostic value of echocardiography in normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2014, 7, 553–560.
  78. Konstantinides, S.V.; Meyer, G.; Becattini, C.; Bueno, H.; Geersing, G.J.; Harjola, V.P.; Huisman, M.V.; Humbert, M.; Jennings, C.S.; Jimenez, D.; et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 543–603.
  79. Wardi, G.; Blanchard, D.; Dittrich, T.; Kaushal, K.; Sell, R. Right ventricle dysfunction and echocardiographic parameters in the first 24h following resuscitation in the post-cardiac arrest patient: A retrospective cohort study. Resuscitation 2016, 103, 71–74.
  80. Righini, M.; Le Gal, G.; Aujesky, D.; Roy, P.-M.; Sanchez, O.; Verschuren, F.; Rutschmann, O.; Nonent, M.; Cornuz, J.; Thys, F.; et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by multidetector CT alone or combined with venous ultrasonography of the leg: A randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2008, 371, 1343–1352.
  81. Alrajab, S.; Youssef, A.M.; Akkus, N.I.; Caldito, G. Pleural ultrasonography versus chest radiography for the diagnosis of pneumothorax: Review of the literature and meta-analysis. Crit. Care 2013, 17, R208.
  82. Obermaier, M.; Katzenschlager, S.; Schneider, N.R.E. Diagnostik und invasive Maßnahmen beim Thoraxtrauma. AINS-Anästhesiologie Intensivmed. Notf. Schmerzther. 2020, 55, 620–633.
  83. Hughes, C.W. Use of an intra-aortic balloon catheter tamponade for controlling intra-abdominal hemorrhage in man. Surgery 1954, 36, 65–68.
  84. King, D.R. Initial Care of the Severely Injured Patient. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 763–770.
  85. Castellini, G.; Gianola, S.; Biffi, A.; Porcu, G.; Fabbri, A.; Ruggieri, M.P.; Coniglio, C.; Napoletano, A.; Coclite, D.; D'Angelo, D.; et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in patients with major trauma and uncontrolled haemorrhagic shock: A systematic review with meta-analysis. World J. Emerg. Surg. 2021, 16, 41.
  86. Hutin, A.; Levy, Y.; Lidouren, F.; Kohlhauer, M.; Carli, P.; Ghaleh, B.; Lamhaut, L.; Tissier, R. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta vs epinephrine in the treatment of non-traumatic cardiac arrest in swine. Ann. Intensive Care 2021, 11, 81.
  87. Deakin, C.D.; Barron, D.J. Haemodynamic effects of descending aortic occlusion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 1996, 33, 49–52.
  88. Brede, J.R.; Lafrenz, T.; Klepstad, P.; Skjaerseth, E.A.; Nordseth, T.; Sovik, E.; Kruger, A.J. Feasibility of Pre-Hospital Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in Non-Traumatic Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2019, 8, e014394.
  89. McGreevy, D.; Dogan, E.; Toivola, A.; Bilos, L.; Pirouzran, A.; Nilsson, K.; Hörer, T. Endovascular resuscitation with aortic balloon occlusion in non-trauma cases: First use of ER-REBOA in Europe. J. Endovasc. Resusc. Trauma Manag. 2017, 1, 42–49.
  90. Drumheller, B.C.; Pinizzotto, J.; Overberger, R.C.; Sabolick, E.E. Goal-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the emergency Department: A feasibility study. Resusc. Plus 2021, 7, 100159.
  91. Levis, A.; Greif, R.; Hautz, W.E.; Lehmann, L.E.; Hunziker, L.; Fehr, T.; Haenggi, M. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A pilot study. Resuscitation 2020, 156, 27–34.
  92. Gamberini, L.; Coniglio, C.; Lupi, C.; Tartaglione, M.; Mazzoli, C.A.; Baldazzi, M.; Cecchi, A.; Ferri, E.; Chiarini, V.; Semeraro, F.; et al. Resuscitative endovascular occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for refractory out of hospital cardiac arrest. An Utstein-based case series. Resuscitation 2021, 165, 161–169.
  93. Brede, J.R.; Skjaerseth, E.; Klepstad, P.; Nordseth, T.; Kruger, A.J. Changes in peripheral arterial blood pressure after resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in non-traumatic cardiac arrest patients. BMC Emerg. Med. 2021, 21, 157.
  94. Jang, D.H.; Lee, D.K.; Jo, Y.H.; Park, S.M.; Oh, Y.T.; Im, C.W. Resuscitative endovascular occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) as a mechanical method for increasing the coronary perfusion pressure in non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Resuscitation 2022.
  95. Daley, J.; Buckley, R.; Kisken, K.C.; Barber, D.; Ayyagari, R.; Wira, C.; Aydin, A.; Latich, I.; Lozada, J.C.P.; Joseph, D.; et al. Emergency department initiated resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is feasible and associated with improvements in end-tidal carbon dioxide. J. Am. Coll. Emerg. Physicians Open 2022, 3, e12791.
  96. Daley, J.; Morrison, J.J.; Sather, J.; Hile, L. The role of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) as an adjunct to ACLS in non-traumatic cardiac arrest. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2017, 35, 731–736.
  97. Brede, J.R.; Skulberg, A.K.; Rehn, M.; Thorsen, K.; Klepstad, P.; Tylleskar, I.; Farbu, B.; Dale, J.; Nordseth, T.; Wiseth, R.; et al. REBOARREST, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A study protocol for a randomised, parallel group, clinical multicentre trial. Trials 2021, 22, 511.
  98. Wildner, G.; Pauker, N.; Archan, S.; Gemes, G.; Rigaud, M.; Pocivalnik, M.; Prause, G. Arterial line in prehospital emergency settings - A feasibility study in four physician-staffed emergency medical systems. Resuscitation 2011, 82, 1198–1201.
  99. Zwisler, S.T.; Zincuk, Y.; Bering, C.B.; Zincuk, A.; Nybo, M.; Mikkelsen, S. Diagnostic value of prehospital arterial blood gas measurements - a randomised controlled trial. Scand. J. Trauma Resusc. Emerg. Med. 2019, 27, 32.
  100. Gilbert, H.C.; Vender, J.S. Arterial Blood Gas Monitoring. Crit. Care Clin. 1995, 11, 233–248.
  101. Prause, G.; Ratzenhofer-Komenda, B.; Offner, A.; Lauda, P.; Voit, H.; Pojer, H. Prehospital point of care testing of blood gases and electrolytes - an evaluation of IRMA. Crit. Care 1997, 1, 79–83.
  102. Spindelboeck, W.; Gemes, G.; Strasser, C.; Toescher, K.; Kores, B.; Metnitz, P.; Haas, J.; Prause, G. Arterial blood gases during and their dynamic changes after cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A prospective clinical study. Resuscitation 2016, 106, 24–29.
  103. Spindelboeck, W.; Moser, A. Spontaneous tension pneumothorax and CO(2) narcosis in a near fatal episode of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2012, 30, 1664.e3.
  104. Kleber, C.; Giesecke, M.T.; Tsokos, M.; Haas, N.P.; Buschmann, C.T. Trauma-related preventable deaths in Berlin 2010: Need to change prehospital management strategies and trauma management education. World J. Surg. 2013, 37, 1154–1161.
  105. Laan, D.V.; Vu, T.D.N.; Thiels, C.A.; Pandian, T.K.; Schiller, H.J.; Murad, M.H.; Aho, J.M. Chest wall thickness and decompression failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anatomic locations in needle thoracostomy. Injury 2016, 47, 797–804.
  106. Inaba, K.; Branco, B.C.; Eckstein, M.; Shatz, D.V.; Martin, M.J.; Green, D.J.; Noguchi, T.T.; Demetriades, D. Optimal positioning for emergent needle thoracostomy: A cadaver-based study. J. Trauma 2011, 71, 1099–1103.
  107. Martin, M.; Satterly, S.; Inaba, K.; Blair, K. Does needle thoracostomy provide adequate and effective decompression of tension pneumothorax? J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012, 73, 1412–1417.
  108. Garner, A.; Poynter, E.; Parsell, R.; Weatherall, A.; Morgan, M.; Lee, A. Association between three prehospital thoracic decompression techniques by physicians and complications: A retrospective, multicentre study in adults. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 2022.
  109. Adler, Y.; Charron, P.; Imazio, M.; Badano, L.; Baron-Esquivias, G.; Bogaert, J.; Brucato, A.; Gueret, P.; Klingel, K.; Lionis, C.; et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Endorsed by: The European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur. Heart J. 2015, 36, 2921–2964.
  110. Alerhand, S.; Carter, J.M. What echocardiographic findings suggest a pericardial effusion is causing tamponade? Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2019, 37, 321–326.
  111. Alpert, E.A.; Amit, U.; Guranda, L.; Mahagna, R.; Grossman, S.A.; Bentancur, A. Emergency department point-of-care ultrasonography improves time to pericardiocentesis for clinically significant effusions. Clin. Exp. Emerg. Med. 2017, 4, 128–132.
  112. Flaris, A.N.; Simms, E.R.; Prat, N.; Reynard, F.; Caillot, J.L.; Voiglio, E.J. Clamshell incision versus left anterolateral thoracotomy. Which one is faster when performing a resuscitative thoracotomy? The tortoise and the hare revisited. World J. Surg. 2015, 39, 1306–1311.
  113. Davies, G.E.; Lockey, D.J. Thirteen survivors of prehospital thoracotomy for penetrating trauma: A prehospital physician-performed resuscitation procedure that can yield good results. J. Trauma 2011, 70, E75–E78.
  114. Tonna, J.E.; Keenan, H.T.; Weir, C. A qualitative analysis of physician decision making in the use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory cardiac arrest. Resusc. Plus 2022, 11, 100278.
  115. Tonna, J.E.; Becker, L.B.; Girotra, S.; Selzman, C.; Thiagarajan, R.R.; Presson, A.P.; Zhang, C.; Keenan, H.T. Resuscitation Using eCPR to Predict Survival After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (Rescue-IHCA Score) Survival Prediction Model--An Analysis of the American Heart Association Get With the Guidelines--Resuscitation Registry. Circulation 2019, 140, A205.
  116. Otani, T.; Sawano, H.; Natsukawa, T.; Nakashima, T.; Oku, H.; Gon, C.; Takahagi, M.; Hayashi, Y. Low-flow time is associated with a favorable neurological outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients resuscitated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. J. Crit. Care 2018, 48, 15–20.
  117. Al-Azri, N.H. How to think like an emergency care provider: A conceptual mental model for decision making in emergency care. Int. J. Emerg. Med. 2020, 13, 17.
  118. Alm-Kruse, K.; Sorensen, G.; Osbakk, S.A.; Sunde, K.; Bendz, B.; Andersen, G.O.; Fiane, A.; Hagen, O.A.; Kramer-Johansen, J. Outcome in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest before and after implementation of an ECPR protocol. Resuscitation 2021, 162, 35–42.
  119. Michels, G.; Wengenmayer, T.; Hagl, C.; Dohmen, C.; Bottiger, B.W.; Bauersachs, J.; Markewitz, A.; Bauer, A.; Grasner, J.T.; Pfister, R.; et al. Recommendations for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR): Consensus statement of DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI and GRC. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2019, 108, 455–464.
  120. Lacerenza, C.N.; Marlow, S.L.; Tannenbaum, S.I.; Salas, E. Team development interventions: Evidence-based approaches for improving teamwork. Am. Psychol. 2018, 73, 517–531.
  121. Couper, K.; Salman, B.; Soar, J.; Finn, J.; Perkins, G.D. Debriefing to improve outcomes from critical illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2013, 39, 1513–1523.
  122. Rudolph, J.W.; Simon, R.; Raemer, D.B.; Eppich, W.J. Debriefing as formative assessment: Closing performance gaps in medical education. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2008, 15, 1010–1016.
  123. Leong, K.; Hanskamp-Sebregts, M.; van der Wal, R.A.; Wolff, A.P. Effects of perioperative briefing and debriefing on patient safety: A prospective intervention study. BMJ Open 2017, 7, e018367.
  124. Johnson, T.J.; Millinchamp, F.J.; Kelly, F.E. Use of a team immediate debrief tool to improve staff well-being after potentially traumatic events. Anaesthesia 2021, 76, 1001–1002.
  125. Roehl, A.; Grottke, O. Prehospital administration of blood and plasma products. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2021, 34, 507–513.
  126. Crombie, N.; Doughty, H.A.; Bishop, J.R.B.; Desai, A.; Dixon, E.F.; Hancox, J.M.; Herbert, M.J.; Leech, C.; Lewis, S.J.; Nash, M.R.; et al. Resuscitation with blood products in patients with trauma-related haemorrhagic shock receiving prehospital care (RePHILL): A multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2022, 9, e250–e261.
  127. Thiels, C.A.; Aho, J.M.; Fahy, A.S.; Parker, M.E.; Glasgow, A.E.; Berns, K.S.; Habermann, E.B.; Zietlow, S.P.; Zielinski, M.D. Prehospital Blood Transfusions in Non-Trauma Patients. World J. Surg. 2016, 40, 2297–2304.
  128. Thies, K.C.; Truhlar, A.; Keene, D.; Hinkelbein, J.; Rutzler, K.; Brazzi, L.; Vivien, B. Pre-hospital blood transfusion—An ESA survey of European practice. Scand. J. Trauma Resusc. Emerg. Med. 2020, 28, 79.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems; Critical Care Medicine; Emergency Medicine
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Manuel Obermaier
,
Stephan Katzenschlager
,
Othmar Kofler
,
Frank Weilbacher
,
Erik Popp
View Times: 384
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 20 Dec 2022
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Feedback