Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Long Zhang
 -- 1306 2022-12-13 04:13:58 |
2 format correct
Conner Chen
 Meta information modification 1306 2022-12-13 10:26:02 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Zhang, L.;  Zhang, S.;  Zhou, H.;  Ren, Z.;  Wang, H.;  Wang, X. Composition and Combustion Characteristics of LCIG. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/38649 (accessed on 16 November 2024).
Zhang L,  Zhang S,  Zhou H,  Ren Z,  Wang H,  Wang X. Composition and Combustion Characteristics of LCIG. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/38649. Accessed November 16, 2024.
Zhang, Long, Shanshan Zhang, Hua Zhou, Zhuyin Ren, Hongchuan Wang, Xiuxun Wang. "Composition and Combustion Characteristics of LCIG" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/38649 (accessed November 16, 2024).
Zhang, L.,  Zhang, S.,  Zhou, H.,  Ren, Z.,  Wang, H., & Wang, X. (2022, December 13). Composition and Combustion Characteristics of LCIG. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/38649
Zhang, Long, et al. "Composition and Combustion Characteristics of LCIG." Encyclopedia. Web. 13 December, 2022.
Composition and Combustion Characteristics of LCIG
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/en15239224

To address the high energy demand in the industrialized world and achieve the goal of carbon neutralization, it is also important to make efficient use of low calorific industrial gases (LCIG), in addition to developing the advanced combustion technology of non-carbon fuels such as hydrogen and ammonia.

low calorific industrial gases opportunity fuels hydrogen fuels

1. Introduction

The amount of energy consumed globally has risen 17-fold in the past century, and the primary contributors to air pollution are emissions of CO2, CO, SO2, and NOx from the burning of fossil fuels. Currently, fossil fuels with a carbon footprint, e.g., coal, oil, and natural gas, provide 85% of the world’s energy needs [1]. To address the high energy demand in the industrialized world and achieve the goal of carbon neutralization, it is also important to make efficient use of low calorific industrial gases (LCIG), in addition to developing the advanced combustion technology of non-carbon fuels such as hydrogen and ammonia [2][3].
Low calorific industrial gases can be mainly divided into three categories: biogas, syngas, and byproduct gas. Biogas is a clean and sustainable energy source that is often produced from waste treatment, primarily agricultural waste, sewage sludge, and industrial organic waste streams [4]. Methane, hydrogen, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and hydrogen sulfide are the main components of biogas. Biogas is essentially a low-grade natural gas with a heat value varying from 5.0 to 7.5 kWh/m3, with increased methane concentration, which is the result of organic breakdown in the absence of molecular oxygen. Syngas is often generated by gasifying coal or by reforming biogas, which is mostly made up of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide [5]. Since syngas composition varies greatly with different production processes, the low calorific value of syngas varies between 1.0 and 2.6 kWh/m3. Byproduct gas comes from a number of industrial processes in the metallurgy, steel, and chemical industries [6]. Blast furnace gas (BFG), coke oven gas (COG), converter gas, tail gas, cracked gas, pyrolysis gas, and other typical byproduct gases are mostly composed of H2, CO, CH4, N2, and H2O. In comparison to methane, Table 1 shows the typical compositions and key characteristics of low calorific industrial gases. Despite being produced from a variety of processes, low calorific industrial gases share similar characteristics in having the major energy sources of H2, CO, and CH4.
Table 1. Typical compositions and key characteristics of LCIG compared with methane.
Fuel Methane Biogas Syngas COG BFG
Volume fraction (%) H2 / / 9 62 5
CH4 100 52 7 28 /
CO / / 14 6 23
CO2 / 40 20 4 23
N2 / 8 50 / 49
Calorific Value (kWh/m3) 9.94 5.17 1.44 4.75 0.95
Density (kg/m3) 0.67 1.20 1.18 0.38 1.27
Stoichiometric mixture fraction Zs (/) 0.34 0.48 0.20 0.24 0.88
Ignition delay time at 1200 K (ms) 45.50 51.90 0.93 0.32 0.15
Laminar flame speed (cm/s) 38.28 21.82 14.85 80.07 8.95
The rapid economic expansion in China has led to drastically rising energy consumption, which has led to a significant increase in the production of low calorific industrial gas sources. There are already more than 30.5 million residential biogas digesters in China, and they produce 12.4 billion m3 of biogas annually, which is equal to 19.0 million tons of standard coal [7]. In China, about 600 downdraft biomass gasification facilities are operational, and can provide syngas to over 209,600 households [8]. There are already more than 260 blast furnaces in China with effective volumes of more than 1000 m3, which generate a significant amount of byproduct gases [9]. In this circumstance, China foresees the great opportunity and challenge in the efficient use of low calorific industrial gases.
Considering that low calorific industrial gases contain many combustible components, it is most common and effective to use these gases by direct combustion in gas turbines, internal combustion engines, and specific burners. For example, Blakey [10], Wright [11] et al. reviewed the application of low calorific industrial gases in gas turbines. Singh [12], Pradhan [13] et al. conducted systematic studies on the utilization of low calorific industrial gases in internal combustion engines. Huang [14], Song [15] et al. adopted specific burners to achieve stable and efficient combustion of low calorific industrial gases.

2. Composition and Combustion Characteristics of LCIG

2.1. Composition Characteristics

The fundamental combustion characteristics of LCIG are quite different from those of traditional gaseous fuels, considering their complexity in the mixture composition. Typical composition ranges of biogas, syngas, coke oven gas, and blast furnace gas are listed in Table 2. As shown, the variable components in biogas are mainly CH4 and CO, with a variation range of about 10%. Combustible components (CH4, H2, CO) in syngas and byproduct gases from different sources vary significantly, and the variation range of H2 can reach 20% at most.
Table 2. Typical composition ranges of LCIG.
Fuel Biogas Syngas COG BFG
Volume fraction (%) CH4 55–65 8–12 20–30 0–3
H2 0–1 35–45 50–70 1–5
CO / 20–30 9–20 20–30
CO2 35–45 15–25 0–5 15–25
N2 0–3 3–5 1–11 60–75
Flame structures, such as flame height and standoff distance, have a positive correlation with the H2 content in LCIG, which contributes to the augmentation of blowoff velocity [16]. CH4 content in LCIG has more effects on the combustion temperature than CO content. Thermal diffusivity is affected by increasing inert content in LCIG, which also lowers the combustion temperature and laminar flame speed [17]. Differences in CH4 content and H2 content in LCIG will cause changes in chemical reaction paths during combustion, and thus affect the ignition delay time and laminar flame speed. For H2-rich LCIG, it has been discovered that the reactions OH + HO2 = H2O + O2 and HO2 + H = OH + OH are crucial. For CH4-rich LCIG, the reactions CH2O + OH = HCO + H2O and CH4 + HO2 = CH3 + H2O2 are crucial [18]. Increasing the H2/CO ratio in LCIG causes an increase in flame length and flame temperature.
Since certain LCIG are highly loaded with components containing sulfur and nitrogen, the direct burning of these LCIG generally results in unacceptable emissions. During the combustion process of LCIG, the pollutant emissions are mainly NOx and CO. Fuel NOx and thermal NOx are the two main causes of NOx emissions. Fuel NOx is produced by the oxidation of nitrogen-containing compounds, such as HCN and NH3, which may be formed during gasification. Thermal NOx is produced in appreciable amounts at high combustion temperatures, when molecular nitrogen in the combustion air is oxidized. The main source of CO emission is from incomplete combustion of LCIG, especially for LCIG with high CO contents.

2.2. Fundamental Combustion Characteristics

Compared with traditional gaseous fuels (CH4 and H2), when burning LCIG, the chemical reaction rate is slower and the chemical reaction intensity is lower, resulting in low combustion efficiency, narrow flammable range, and high combustion instability. As for the fundamental combustion characteristics, the impact of LCIG composition on ignition delay time, flame instability, and laminar and turbulent flame speeds are summarized here. The ignition delay time of low calorific industrial gas is mainly affected by the H2 content in LCIG. Higher H2 content leads to shorter ignition delay time. The ignition delay time of LCIG is also sensitive to the initial temperature and pressure of the LCIG combustion system [19].
Laminar flame speed increases nonlinearly with an increase in H2 concentration in LCIG. Laminar flame speed noticeably increases with equivalence ratio. Flame instability increases with the CO2 concentration in LCIG, but decreases with a decrease in the equivalency ratio. High pressure, high H2 concentration, and low equivalence ratio are the conditions under which the cellular flame self-accelerates. Markstein length and hydrodynamic instability both decrease with a rise in LCIG initial pressure, while the thermal mass diffusion instability has no effect [20]. For autoignition-assisted laminar flame propagation, the scaling laws for H2/CO/CH4 have been developed to characterize the negative temperature coefficient (NTC) behavior, with one branch indicating flame propagation, and the other indicating autoignition-assisted flame propagation [21].
For turbulent flame speed, the ratio of turbulent flame speed to laminar flame speed exhibits a nonlinear declining trend with H2 concentration in LCIG, and the growth rate progressively declines. The influence of turbulence on the flame speed steadily declines as the H2 concentration of LCIG approach 50% [22]. CO concentrations in LCIG have a significant impact on the turbulent flame structure. Reduced turbulent flame speed and enhanced combustion instability result from an increase in CO concentration. These effects increase when the equivalence ratio decreases [23].

References

  1. Hajiyev, N.; Abdimomynova, A.; Trukhan, D. Global and local aspects of world energy consumption: Forecast and risks. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Energy 2022, 7, 1–32.
  2. Li, S.; Zhou, H.; Hou, L.; Ren, Z. An analytic model for the effects of nitrogen dilution and premixing characteristics on NOx formation in turbulent premixed hydrogen flames. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 7060–7070.
  3. Shu, T.; Xue, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Ren, Z. An experimental study of laminar ammonia/methane/air premixed flames using expanding spherical flames. Fuel 2021, 290, 120003.
  4. Lu, J.; Gao, X. Biogas: Potential, challenges, and perspectives in a changing China. Biomass-Bioenergy 2021, 150, 106127.
  5. Jung, S.; Lee, J.; Moon, D.H.; Kim, K.H.; Kwon, E.E. Upgrading biogas into syngas through dry reforming. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 143, 110949.
  6. Pena, J.G.C.; de Oliveira, V.B.; Salles, J.L.F. Optimal scheduling of a by-product gas supply system in the iron- and steel-making process under uncertainties. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2019, 125, 351–364.
  7. Jiang, X.; Sommer, S.G.; Christensen, K.V. A review of the biogas industry in China. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 6073–6081.
  8. Yao, X.; Zhao, Z.; Chen, S.; Zhou, H.; Xu, K. Migration and transformation behaviours of ash residues from a typical fixed-bed gasification station for biomass syngas production in China. Energy 2020, 201, 117646.
  9. Zhou, D.; Cheng, S.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, X. The production of large blast furnaces during 2016 and future development of ironmaking in China. Ironmak. Steelmak. 2017, 44, 714–720.
  10. Blakey, S.; Rye, L.; Wilson, C.W. Aviation gas turbine alternative fuels: A review. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2011, 33, 2863–2885.
  11. Wright, I.G.; Gibbons, T.B. Recent developments in gas turbine materials and technology and their implications for syngas firing. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32, 3610–3621.
  12. Singh, P.; Kumar, R.; Sharma, S.; Kumar, S. Effect of engine parameters on the performance of dual-fuel CI engines with producer gas—A review. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 16377–16402.
  13. Pradhan, A.; Baredar, P.; Kumar, A. Syngas as an alternative fuel used in internal combustion engines: A review. J. Pure Appl. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 51–66.
  14. Huang, R.; Cheng, L.; Qiu, K.; Zheng, C.; Luo, Z. Low-calorific gas combustion in a two-layer porous burner. Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 1364–1374.
  15. Song, F.; Wen, Z.; Dong, Z.; Wang, E.; Liu, X. Ultra-low calorific gas combustion in a gradually-varied porous burner with annular heat recirculation. Energy 2017, 119, 497–503.
  16. Nurmukan, D.; Chen, T.J.M.; Hung, Y.M.; Ismadi, M.; Chong, C.T.; Tran, M. Enhancement of biogas/air combustion by hydrogen addition at elevated temperatures. Int. J. Energy Res. 2020, 44, 1519–1534.
  17. Chen, J.; Chen, G.; Zhang, A.; Deng, H.; Wen, X.; Wang, F.; Sheng, W.; Zheng, H. Numerical simulation of the effect of CH4/CO concentration on combustion characteristics of low calorific value syngas. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 5754–5763.
  18. de Castro, R.R.; Brequigny, P.; Dufitumukiza, J.P.; Mounaim-Rousselle, C. Laminar flame speed of different syngas compositions for varying thermodynamic conditions. Fuel 2021, 301, 121025.
  19. Benaissa, S.; Adouane, B.; Ali, S.M.; Mohammad, A. Effect of hydrogen addition on the combustion characteristics of premixed biogas/hydrogen-air mixtures. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 18661–18677.
  20. Hu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Hou, X. Experimental study on self-acceleration characteristics of unstable flame of low calorific value gas blended with hydrogen. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 25248–25256.
  21. Gong, X.; Ren, Z. Flame speed scaling in autoignition-assisted freely propagating n-heptane/air flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2021, 38, 2153–2161.
  22. Jiang, Y.; Li, G.; Li, H.; Zhang, G.; Lv, J. Study on the effect of hydrogen fraction on the premixed combustion characteristics of syngas/air mixtures. Energy 2020, 200, 117592.
  23. Liu, H.; Wang, Y.; Yu, T.; Liu, H.; Cai, W.; Weng, S. Effect of carbon dioxide content in biogas on turbulent combustion in the combustor of micro gas turbine. Renew. Energy 2020, 147, 1299–1311.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Engineering, Industrial
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Long Zhang
,
Shanshan Zhang
,
Hua Zhou
,
Zhuyin Ren
,
Hongchuan Wang
,
Xiuxun Wang
View Times: 340
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 13 Dec 2022
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    ScholarVision Creations
    Feedback