Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Kelli Marie McCourt
 -- 1441 2022-12-01 16:51:39 |
2 Format correction
Sirius Huang
 Meta information modification 1441 2022-12-06 01:57:34 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Mccourt, K.M.;  Cochran, J.;  Abdelbasir, S.M.;  Carraway, E.R.;  Tzeng, T.J.;  Tsyusko, O.V.;  Vanegas, D.C. Exposure Effects Related to Nanomaterial Life Cycles. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/38037 (accessed on 26 April 2024).
Mccourt KM,  Cochran J,  Abdelbasir SM,  Carraway ER,  Tzeng TJ,  Tsyusko OV, et al. Exposure Effects Related to Nanomaterial Life Cycles. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/38037. Accessed April 26, 2024.
Mccourt, Kelli M., Jarad Cochran, Sabah M. Abdelbasir, Elizabeth R. Carraway, Tzuen-Rong J. Tzeng, Olga V. Tsyusko, Diana C. Vanegas. "Exposure Effects Related to Nanomaterial Life Cycles" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/38037 (accessed April 26, 2024).
Mccourt, K.M.,  Cochran, J.,  Abdelbasir, S.M.,  Carraway, E.R.,  Tzeng, T.J.,  Tsyusko, O.V., & Vanegas, D.C. (2022, December 05). Exposure Effects Related to Nanomaterial Life Cycles. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/38037
Mccourt, Kelli M., et al. "Exposure Effects Related to Nanomaterial Life Cycles." Encyclopedia. Web. 05 December, 2022.
Exposure Effects Related to Nanomaterial Life Cycles
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/bios12121082

Nanoparticle-based biosensors are produced and utilized at different scales ranging from laboratory to industrial domains. While incorporating nanomaterials is beneficial to developing high-performance biosensors, at the stages of scale-up and disposal, it may lead to the unmanaged release of toxic nanomaterials. When considering the potential environmental impact and health safety of the scaled-up production of nano biosensors, it is necessary to examine the manufacturing, utilization, and end-of-life disposal of the nanomaterials used. 

dimensionality life cycle nanocomposite nanomaterial nanotoxicity surface chemistry toxicity transformation

1. Introduction

Nanoparticles are naturally occurring or engineered particles or materials less than 100 nm in size in at least one dimension. According to the European Commission, a Nanomaterial contains 50% or more particles in that size range [1]. At the nanoscale, particles often exist with unique physical properties distinct from the properties of their bulk form due to increased relative surface area per volume unit and the dominance of quantum effects [2][3]. The enhanced optical, magnetic, electrical, and catalytic properties of nanomaterials, including nanometals, nanometal oxides, carbon-based nanomaterials, and inorganic two-dimensional nanoparticles, have made them useful in various applications. Specifically, the field of nano biosensing has significantly expanded the frontiers for the development of high-performance sensing devices [4][5].
Biosensors employ biological or biomimetic recognition elements (e.g., antibodies, enzymes, molecularly imprinted polymers, aptamers, etc.) to selectively bind (and, in some cases, react) with target analytes potentially present in complex samples. Biosensor applications span a wide spectrum, including the fields of medicine, food safety, drug development, and environmental monitoring [6]. The biological elements typically utilized in biosensing platforms are often combined with nanomaterials with different compositions and dimensions [7] to facilitate or enhance the recognition and transduction processes of the operating mechanism of the biosensor device [8][9][10]. Generally, operation modes include electrochemical (measures changes in voltage, current, capacitance, impedance, etc.), electronic, optical (measures changes in fluorescence, luminescence, optical diffraction, etc.), piezoelectric, thermometric, acoustic, and colorimetric detection mechanisms. In most cases, nanomaterial-enabled technologies, such as biosensors and bioelectronics, are manufactured, used, and disposed of in a linear end-of-life fashion. Since the existing research on fate, transport, transformations, bioaccumulation, biomagnification, and toxicity of engineered nanomaterials is still in its infancy, there are significant knowledge gaps regarding the potential long-term health and environmental impacts of mass-produced nanoparticles used in novel technologies, such as biosensors.

2. Exposure Effects Related to Nanomaterial Life Cycles

When considering the potential environmental impact and health safety of the scaled-up production of nano biosensors, it is necessary to examine the manufacturing, utilization, and end-of-life disposal of the nanomaterials used. This type of risk assessment is considered a life cycle assessment (LCA). The life cycle includes the production of the nanomaterial-containing products, their use, disposal, and such end-of-life stages as reuse, recycling, recovery, and final disposal. Environmental impacts and health risks could be present at each stage and should be assessed [11].
At the production stage, nanomaterials can impact human health via direct occupational exposure. During the manufacturing process, individuals can be exposed to nanomaterials via the classical routes of exposure, i.e., inhalation, ingestion, and dermal contact. These exposures are of concern because nanomaterials often display enhanced toxicity different from that of their bulk counterparts. Inhalation of nanoparticles in an occupational setting can occur via exposure to dust-containing aerosolized nanoparticles. In the workplace, aerosolized nanoparticles can be generated through several manufacturing processes [12]. Workers can be exposed through nanoproduct harvesting, processing (handlining and packaging), and equipment cleaning [13]. Once inhaled, these nanoparticles can deposit in the lungs and respiratory tract, where they have been shown to accumulate and generate toxicity [14]. Dermal exposures to nanomaterials occur through skin contact with contaminated surfaces. In an occupational setting, dermal exposure to nanomaterials becomes especially problematic if nanomaterials have associated toxicities or contain impurities and if workers have compromised skin integrity [15][16].
Greater standardization of regulations related to exposure limits and safety controls (personal and engineer) is needed to overcome the toxicity concerns associated with nanomaterial exposure in occupational settings. Studies have shown that if employed correctly, process modification, engineered controls, and personal protective equipment can control nanomaterial exposure. However, the implementation of these controls is often lacking, and regulatory bodies do not have many set occupational exposure limits [17][18][19]. Unless these issues are addressed, the scaled-up production of biosensors will further contribute to the problem.
Potential environmental impacts associated with biosensors could also originate from the intentional and unintentional releases of nanoparticle-containing waste streams (atmospheric, waste solids, and waste liquids) during production [20][21][22]. For example, It has been reported that nanomaterials such as Cu, TiO2, Ag, or CeO2 could enter wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), be eliminated mainly through the primary and secondary treatment, and then associated with the solid phases of sludge by over 80% by mass [23][24][25][26]. Dried sludge is then applied at a landfill resulting in the return of nanomaterial-contaminated sludge back to the environment. Many nanomaterials have antimicrobial properties. The initial concentration of nanomaterials present in wastewater or sludge may be low, but the accumulation of the nanomaterials in the wastewater stream and returned sludge could become problematic. It is also possible that the increased concentration of toxic nanomaterials could crash the WWTPs by killing the microorganisms essential for Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) reduction.
A deeper understanding of the scale of environmental releases, and therefore potential environmental health concerns, is limited by the lack of consistent reporting of production quantities. While some efforts are being made by organizations such as the environmental protection organization (EPA) (premanufacture notifications (PMNs) and significant new use notices (SNURs)) more robust regulations and requirements on the reporting of production are needed to assess the true risk of nanomaterial production [27].
Once products are sold to consumers, further human and environmental exposures are possible. Nanomaterials are already widely applied in commercial products such as appliances, agricultural products, construction materials, cosmetics, foods, beverages, medical devices, and drug products [28][29]. As these products are used, they degrade, releasing nanomaterials into the surrounding environment [30][31]. Once in the environment, these nanoparticles, which are often engineered, persist much longer due to the modifications (capping, functionalization, etc.) used to stabilize the particles [32]. In general, the utilization of biosensors for point-of-care, laboratory detection, and clinical diagnostic purposes poses limited risks. However, implantable biosensors could pose more significant risks associated with their biocompatibility and toxicity with the biosensor materials. While several countries and institutions are attempting to establish regulatory frameworks, global regulations regarding nanomaterials in consumer products are lacking [28].
Nanomaterial waste from nano biosensors can also originate from the disposal of spent devices in landfills and the leachates associated with such a disposal method. Leachates containing nanomaterials can be generated from solid waste landfills, which could directly affect both the aerobic and anaerobic processes of WWTPs. Taylor et al. investigated the impact of three copper particles, micron-and nanoscale Cu particles, and a nanoscale Cu(OH)2-based fungicide on the function and operation of a model septic tank. The results indicated that systems exposed to the three Cu particles caused distinct disruptions in septic tank function. Temizel et al. (2017) studied the effect of nano-ZnO on biogas generation from simulated landfills over one year. They demonstrated up to 99% of nano-ZnO was retained in the waste matrix, leading to a decrease in biogas production of 15% [33]. Incineration is one of the important strategies for sewage sludge management. The potential for air pollution due to aerosols generated during wastewater treatment and incineration could also pose risks to the environment and human health.
To mitigate possible risks associated with the disposal of nano biosensors, methods for reuse and recycling should be explored. Traditional techniques for the recycling of nanoparticles include separation techniques such as centrifugation and solvent evaporation. However, these techniques are energy intensive. Alternative methods include the application of molecular antisolvents, pH or thermal-responsive materials, and magnetic fields [34]. In batteries, the successful recovery of nanomaterials has already been demonstrated at the benchtop level for nanomaterials such as Zn and ZnO nanoparticles and Graphite-polyaniline nanocomposites via Inert gas condensation (thermal) and vacuum separation, hydrometallurgy and liquid-liquid extraction, and oxidative polymerization and precipitation [35]. Barriers to the effective recycling and reuse of nanomaterials arise from a lack of guidelines and strategies for the recovery and reuse of nanomaterials [34]. As researchers and regulatory bodies work to establish practical strategies and guidelines, the development of reusable biosensors should be prioritized [36][37].
Strategies to reduce and control the toxicity of nanoparticles are also needed to manage the negative impacts associated with exposure. Current strategies include the coating and encapsulation, loading, grafting, and doping of nanoparticles [38][39]. The development of new strategies requires further research into the mechanisms of nanoparticle toxicity as nanomaterials suitable for the fabrication of biosensors have associated scales of toxicity. A greater understanding of these factors can be leveraged to develop targeted strategies to modify nanoparticles used in the fabrication of biosensors.

References

  1. Mech, A.; Wohlleben, W.; Ghanem, A.; Hodoroaba, V.D.; Weigel, S.; Babick, F.; Brüngel, R.; Friedrich, C.M.; Rasmussen, K.; Rauscher, H. Nano or Not Nano? A Structured Approach for Identifying Nanomaterials According to the European Commission’s Definition. Small 2020, 16, 2002228.
  2. Khan, I.; Saeed, K.; Khan, I. Nanoparticles: Properties, Applications and Toxicities. Arab. J. Chem. 2019, 12, 908–931.
  3. Sudha, P.N.; Sangeetha, K.; Vijayalakshmi, K.; Barhoum, A. Nanomaterials History, Classification, Unique Properties, Production and Market. In Emerging Applications of Nanoparticles and Architecture Nanostructures; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 341–384.
  4. Hammond, J.L.; Formisano, N.; Estrela, P.; Carrara, S.; Tkac, J. Electrochemical Biosensors and Nanobiosensors. Essays Biochem. 2016, 60, 69.
  5. Luo, X.; Morrin, A.; Killard, A.J.; Smyth, M.R. Application of Nanoparticles in Electrochemical Sensors and Biosensors. Electroanalysis 2006, 18, 319–326.
  6. Bhalla, N.; Jolly, P.; Formisano, N.; Estrela, P. Introduction to Biosensors. Essays Biochem. 2016, 60, 1–8.
  7. Bolotsky, A.; Butler, D.; Dong, C.; Gerace, K.; Glavin, N.R.; Muratore, C.; Robinson, J.A.; Ebrahimi, A. Two-Dimensional Materials in Biosensing and Healthcare: From in Vitro Diagnostics to Optogenetics and Beyond. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 9781–9810.
  8. Murphy, L. Biosensors and Bioelectrochemistry. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2006, 10, 177–184.
  9. Kulabhusan, P.K.; Tripathi, A.; Kant, K.; Gold, N.; Kulabhusan, P.K.; Tripathi, A.; Kant, K. Gold Nanoparticles and Plant Pathogens: An Overview and Prospective for Biosensing in Forestry. Sensors 2022, 22, 1259.
  10. Ornelas-Hernández, L.F.; Garduno-Robles, A.; Zepeda-Moreno, A. A Brief Review of Carbon Dots–Silica Nanoparticles Synthesis and Their Potential Use as Biosensing and Theragnostic Applications. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2022, 17, 56.
  11. Donia, D.T.; Carbone, M. Fate of the Nanoparticles in Environmental Cycles. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 16, 583–600.
  12. Ferdous, Z.; Nemmar, A. Health Impact of Silver Nanoparticles: A Review of the Biodistribution and Toxicity Following Various Routes of Exposure. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2375.
  13. Heitbrink, W.A.; Lo, L.M.; Dunn, K.H. Exposure Controls for Nanomaterials at Three Manufacturing Sites. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 2015, 12, 16.
  14. Xia, T.; Li, N.; Nel, A.E. Potential Health Impact of Nanoparticles. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2009, 30, 137–150.
  15. Larese Filon, F.; Bello, D.; Cherrie, J.W.; Sleeuwenhoek, A.; Spaan, S.; Brouwer, D.H. Occupational Dermal Exposure to Nanoparticles and Nano-Enabled Products: Part I—Factors Affecting Skin Absorption. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2016, 219, 536–544.
  16. Goede, H.; Christopher-De Vries, Y.; Kuijpers, E.; Fransman, W. A Review of Workplace Risk Management Measures for Nanomaterials to Mitigate Inhalation and Dermal Exposure. Ann. Work Expo. Health 2018, 62, 907–922.
  17. Kim, J.; Yu, I.J. National Survey of Workplaces Handling and Manufacturing Nanomaterials, Exposure to and Health Effects of Nanomaterials, and Evaluation of Nanomaterial Safety Data Sheets. Biomed Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 8389129.
  18. Methner, M.; Hodson, L.; Dames, A.; Geraci, C. Nanoparticle Emission Assessment Technique (NEAT) for the Identification and Measurement of Potential Inhalation Exposure to Engineered Nanomaterials—Part B: Results from 12 Field Studies. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 2010, 7, 163–176.
  19. OSHA. What Are Nanotechnology and Nanomaterials? Occupational Safety and Health: Washington, DC, USA, 2013.
  20. Wamucho, A.; Heffley, A.; Tsyusko, O.V. Epigenetic Effects Induced by Silver Nanoparticles in Caenorhabditis Elegans after Multigenerational Exposure. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 725, 138523.
  21. Starnes, D.L.; Lichtenberg, S.S.; Unrine, J.M.; Starnes, C.P.; Oostveen, E.K.; Lowry, G.V.; Bertsch, P.M.; Tsyusko, O.V. Distinct Transcriptomic Responses of Caenorhabditis Elegans to Pristine and Sulfidized Silver Nanoparticles. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 213, 314–321.
  22. Zhang, Y.; Gu, A.Z.; Xie, S.; Li, X.; Cen, T.; Li, D.; Chen, J. Nano-Metal Oxides Induce Antimicrobial Resistance via Radical-Mediated Mutagenesis. Environ. Int. 2018, 121, 1162–1171.
  23. Ganesh, R.; Smeraldi, J.; Hosseini, T.; Khatib, L.; Olson, B.H.; Rosso, D. Evaluation of Nanocopper Removal and Toxicity in Municipal Wastewaters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 7808–7813.
  24. Gómez-Rivera, F.; Field, J.A.; Brown, D.; Sierra-Alvarez, R. Fate of Cerium Dioxide (CeO2) Nanoparticles in Municipal Wastewater during Activated Sludge Treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 108, 300–304.
  25. Kaegi, R.; Voegelin, A.; Sinnet, B.; Zuleeg, S.; Hagendorfer, H.; Burkhardt, M.; Siegrist, H. Behavior of Metallic Silver Nanoparticles in a Pilot Wastewater Treatment Plant. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 3902–3908.
  26. Wang, Y.; Westerhoff, P.; Hristovski, K.D. Fate and Biological Effects of Silver, Titanium Dioxide, and C60 (Fullerene) Nanomaterials during Simulated Wastewater Treatment Processes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 201–202, 16–22.
  27. Hendren, C.O.; Mesnard, X.; Dröge, J.; Wiesner, M.R. Estimating Production Data for Five Engineered Nanomaterials as a Basis for Exposure Assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 2562–2569.
  28. Subhan, M.A.; Subhan, T. Safety and Global Regulations for Application of Nanomaterials. In Nanomaterials Recycling; Micro and Nano Technologies; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 83–107.
  29. Food and Drug Administration; Office of the Commissioner; Office of Policy, L.I.A.; Office of Policy. Considering Whether an FDA-Regulated Product Involves the Application of Nanotechnology; Food and Drug Administration: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2014.
  30. Yang, Y.; Westerhoff, P. Presence in, and Release of, Nanomaterials from Consumer Products. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2014, 811, 1–17.
  31. Malakar, A.; Kanel, S.R.; Ray, C.; Snow, D.D.; Nadagouda, M.N. Nanomaterials in the Environment, Human Exposure Pathway, and Health Effects: A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 759, 143470.
  32. Bhatt, I.; Tripathi, B.N. Interaction of Engineered Nanoparticles with Various Components of the Environment and Possible Strategies for Their Risk Assessment. Chemosphere 2011, 82, 308–317.
  33. Temizel, İ.; Emadian, S.M.; Di Addario, M.; Onay, T.T.; Demirel, B.; Copty, N.K.; Karanfil, T. Effect of Nano-ZnO on Biogas Generation from Simulated Landfills. Waste Manag. 2017, 63, 18–26.
  34. Živković, D.; Balanović, L.; Mitovski, A.; Talijan, N.; Štrbac, N.; Sokić, M.; Manasijević, D.; Minić, D.; Ćosović, V. Nanomaterials Environmental Risks and Recycling: Actual Issues. Reciklaza I Odrziv. Razvoj 2015, 7, 1–8.
  35. Pavoski, G.; Botelho Junior, A.B.; Chaves, R.M.; Maraschin, T.; Oviedo, L.R.; Martins, T.A.G.; da Silva, W.L.; Bertuol, D.A.; Espinosa, D.C.R. Nanotechnology and Recycling, Remanufacturing, and Reusing Battery. In Nanotechnology and Recycling, Remanufacturing, and Reusing Battery; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 53–78.
  36. Hwang, C.; Park, N.; Kim, E.S.; Kim, M.; Kim, S.D.; Park, S.; Kim, N.Y.; Kim, J.H. Ultra-Fast and Recyclable DNA Biosensor for Point-of-Care Detection of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 185, 113177.
  37. Shi, L.; Wang, Y.; Chu, Z.; Yin, Y.; Jiang, D.; Luo, J.; Ding, S.; Jin, W. A Highly Sensitive and Reusable Electrochemical Mercury Biosensor Based on Tunable Vertical Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and a Target Recycling Strategy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 1073–1080.
  38. Yan, L.; Zhao, F.; Wang, J.; Zu, Y.; Gu, Z.; Zhao, Y. A Safe-by-Design Strategy towards Safer Nanomaterials in Nanomedicines. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1805391.
  39. Najahi-Missaoui, W.; Arnold, R.D.; Cummings, B.S. Safe Nanoparticles: Are We There Yet? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 22, 385.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Engineering, Environmental; Toxicology; Nanoscience & Nanotechnology
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Kelli M. McCourt
,
Jarad Cochran
,
Sabah M. Abdelbasir
,
Elizabeth R. Carraway
,
Tzuen-Rong J. Tzeng
,
Olga V. Tsyusko
,
Diana C. Vanegas
View Times: 346
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 06 Dec 2022
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Feedback