Your browser does not fully support modern features. Please upgrade for a smoother experience.
Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic. For video creation, please contact our Academic Video Service.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 handwiki Dean Liu -- 1131 2022-11-08 01:39:29

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Academic Video Service to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
HandWiki. F.B.T. Productions, LLC V. Aftermath Records. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/37863 (accessed on 30 September 2026).
HandWiki. F.B.T. Productions, LLC V. Aftermath Records. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/37863. Accessed September 30, 2026.
HandWiki. "F.B.T. Productions, LLC V. Aftermath Records" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/37863 (accessed September 30, 2026).
HandWiki. (2022, December 02). F.B.T. Productions, LLC V. Aftermath Records. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/37863
HandWiki. "F.B.T. Productions, LLC V. Aftermath Records." Encyclopedia. Web. 02 December, 2022.
F.B.T. Productions, LLC V. Aftermath Records
Edit

F.B.T. Productions, LLC, et al. v. Aftermath Records, et al. 621 F.3d 958 was a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dealt with how Federal Copyright Law applied to the sales and licensing contracts of music downloads and other downloadable copyrighted material. Specifically, the circuit court ruled that a licensing provision in the contract between F.B.T. Productions and Aftermath Records unambiguously applied to permanent downloads and mastertones offered through third party distributors. After reviewing the First Sale Doctrine and the nature of Aftermath's contracts with its distributors, the circuit court concluded that such downloads constituted a licensing of copyrights rather than a sale, causing Aftermath to pay higher royalties to F.B.T. under their agreement.

copyright f.b.t licensing

References

  1. U.S. District Court, Central District of California (Los Angeles), January 20, 2009 http://reporter.blogs.com/files/fbt-summary-judgment-decision.doc
  2. F.B.T. Productions, LLC v. Aftermath Records opinion, Argued and Submitted July 12, 2010 http://www.howardrice.com/webfiles/09-55817.pdf
  3. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied., March 21, 2011 https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12478269983023958737&q=F.B.T.+Productions,+LLC+v.+Aftermath+Records&hl=en&as_sdt=2,5,
More
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Others
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
View Times: 739
Entry Collection: HandWiki
Revision: 1 time (View History)
Update Date: 02 Dec 2022
Notice
You are not a member of the advisory board for this topic. If you want to update advisory board member profile, please contact office@encyclopedia.pub.
OK
Confirm
Only members of the Encyclopedia advisory board for this topic are allowed to note entries. Would you like to become an advisory board member of the Encyclopedia?
Yes
No
${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
There is no comment~
${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
${ selectedItem.replyTextCharacter }/${ selectedItem.replyMaxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
Confirm
Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Academic Video Service