Video Upload Options

References

1. Mobile Positioning Using Wireless Networks http://emits.sso.esa.int/emits-doc/1-5200-RD24-Mobile-positioning-using-wireless-networks.pdf
2. Laitinen, H.; Lahteenmaki, J.; Nordstrom, T. (2001). "Database correlation method for GSM location". IEEE VTS 53rd Vehicular Technology Conference, Spring 2001. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37202) (Rhodes, Greece: IEEE) 4: 2504–2508. doi:10.1109/VETECS.2001.944052. ISBN 9780780367289.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1109%2FVETECS.2001.944052
3. "Location Based Services for Mobiles: Technologies and Standards“, Shu Wang, Jungwon Min and Byung K. Yi, IEEE International Conference on Communication (ICC) 2008, Beijing, China http://to.swang.googlepages.com/ICC2008LBSforMobilessimplifiedR2.pdf
4. Handset-based mobile phone tracking app example 1: MobileTrack http://www.crystalball.tv/mobile-phone-tracking/
5. Ibrahim, M.; Youssef, M. (2012-01-01). "CellSense: An Accurate Energy-Efficient GSM Positioning System". IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 61 (1): 286–296. doi:10.1109/TVT.2011.2173771. ISSN 0018-9545.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1109%2FTVT.2011.2173771
6. Ibrahim, M.; Youssef, M. (2010-12-01). "CellSense: A Probabilistic RSSI-Based GSM Positioning System". 2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM 2010): 1–5. doi:10.1109/GLOCOM.2010.5683779. ISBN 978-1-4244-5636-9. Bibcode: 2010arXiv1004.3178I.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1109%2FGLOCOM.2010.5683779
7. Ibrahim, M.; Youssef, M. (2011-06-01). "A Hidden Markov Model for Localization Using Low-End GSM Cell Phones". 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC): 1–5. doi:10.1109/icc.2011.5962993. ISBN 978-1-61284-232-5.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1109%2Ficc.2011.5962993
8. ETSI TS 102 223 V9.1.0 SIM standard
9. Ted Gibbons (25 August 2008). "Vodafone Local Zone". PC World. http://www.pcworld.co.nz/article/484018/vodafone_local_zone_-_landline_your_mobile. 
10. "Q&A on Location Data". apple.com. Apple. https://www.apple.com/pr/library/2011/04/27Apple-Q-A-on-Location-Data.html. Retrieved 2013-03-08. 
11. Pourhomayoun; Fowler (2012). "Improving WLAN-Based Indoor Mobile Positioning Using Sparsity". Asilomar Conference on Signal Processing 2012. http://ws2.binghamton.edu/fowler/Improving%20WLAN-Based%20Indoor%20Mobile%20Positioning%20Using%20Sparsity.pdf. 
12. Declan McCullagh and Anne Broache (6 December 2006). "Roving Bug in Cell Phones Used By FBI to Eavesdrop on Syndicate". The Chicago Syndicate -BLOG. http://www.thechicagosyndicate.com/2006/12/roving-bug-in-cell-phones-used-by-fbi.html. 
13. A common smartphone feature helped find missing woman https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2019/01/23/how-common-smartphone-app-helped-find-missing-woman/RBkDlEaBIBkOIplzJPrtDK/story.html
14. Waxman, Seth. "Brief for technology companies as amici curiae in support of neither party". Supreme Court of the United States. http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/16-402-ac-technology-companies.pdf. Retrieved 23 June 2018. 
15. "Your phone company is watching - TEDGlobal 2012". ted.com. June 2012. https://www.ted.com/talks/malte_spitz_your_phone_company_is_watching. Retrieved 26 January 2016. 
16. Fitzgerald, Britney (25 July 2012). "Malte Spitz's TED Talk Takes On Mobile Phone Privacy Debate (VIDEO)". Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/25/malte-spitzs-ted-talk-_n_1701775.html. Retrieved 26 January 2016. 
17. Biermann, Kai (10 March 2011). "Betrayed by our own data". ZEIT. http://www.zeit.de/digital/datenschutz/2011-03/data-protection-malte-spitz. Retrieved 26 January 2016. 
18. Cecilia Kang (March 3, 2011). "China plans to track cellphone users, sparking human rights concerns". The Washington Post. http://voices.washingtonpost.com/posttech/2011/03/china_said_it_may_begin.html. 
19. D. Quercia, Ilias Leontiadis, Liam McNamara, Cecilia Mascolo, Jon Crowcroft (2011). SpotME If You Can: Randomized Responses for Location Obfuscation on Mobile Phones. IEEE ICDCS http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~dq209/publications/spotme.pdf
20. Carpenter v. United States, 583 U.S. (Supreme Court of the United States 22 June 2018) ("The Government’s acquisition of Carpenter’s cell-site records was a Fourth Amendment search."). https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/16-402
21. Riley v. California, 573 U.S. (Supreme Court of the United States 25 June 2014) ("Required a warrant to search mobile telecommunications devices."). https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/13-132
22. United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (Supreme Court of the United States 23 January 2012) ("Limited use of GPS devices [such as in a cell phone] to track movements."). https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/10-1259
23. Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (Supreme Court of the United States 18 December 18, 1967) ("(a) that an enclosed telephone booth is an area where, like a home, and unlike a field, a person has a constitutionally protected reasonable expectation of privacy; (b) that electronic as well as physical intrusion into a place that is in this sense private may constitute a violation of the Fourth Amendment; and (c) that an invasion of a constitutionally protected area by federal authorities is, as the Court has long held, presumptively unreasonable in the absence of a search warrant."). https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/389/347
24. Ex parte Jackson, 96 U.S. 727 (Supreme Court of the United States 1878) ("Letters and sealed packages subject to letter postage in the mail can be opened and examined only under like warrant, issued upon similar oath or affirmation, particularly describing the thing to be seized, as is required when papers are subjected to search in one's own household. The constitutional guaranty of the right of the people to be secure in their papers against unreasonable searches and seizures extends to their papers, thus closed against inspection, wherever they may be."). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/96/727/case.html
25. "Stored Communications Act (18 U.S. Code § 2703(d) - Required disclosure of customer communications or records)". https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2703. "Requirements for Court Order.— A court order for disclosure under subsection (b) or (c) may be issued by any court that is a court of competent jurisdiction and shall issue only if the governmental entity offers specific and articulable facts showing that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the contents of a wire or electronic communication, or the records or other information sought, are relevant and material to an ongoing criminal investigation. In the case of a State governmental authority, such a court order shall not issue if prohibited by the law of such State. A court issuing an order pursuant to this section, on a motion made promptly by the service provider, may quash or modify such order, if the information or records requested are unusually voluminous in nature or compliance with such order otherwise would cause an undue burden on such provider." 
26. "47 CFR Part 0, Subpart E - Privacy Act Regulations". https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/47/part-0/subpart-E. 
27. United States v. Karo, 468 U.S. 705 (Supreme Court of the United States 3 July 1984) ("the use of a beeper to conduct surveillance on Karo and his accomplices constituted an unlawful search and seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment."). https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/468/705
28. Liptak, Adam (23 June 2018). "Warrant Required for Cellphone Tracking Data" (in English) (print). The New York Times CLXII (58,002): pp. A1, A16. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/22/us/politics/supreme-court-warrants-cell-phone-privacy.html. "“We decline to grant the state unrestricted access to a wireless carrier’s database of physical location information,” Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote for the majority. ... “Mapping a cellphone’s location over the course of 127 days provides an all-encompassing record of the holder’s whereabouts,” he wrote, going on to quote from an earlier opinion. “As with GPS information, the time-stamped data provides an intimate window into a person’s life, revealing not only his particular movements, but through them his ‘familial, political, professional, religious and sexual associations.’” ... “cellphones and the services they provide are ‘such a pervasive and insistent part of daily life’ that carrying one is indispensable to participation in modern society.”"