Your browser does not fully support modern features. Please upgrade for a smoother experience.
Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic. For video creation, please contact our Academic Video Service.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 handwiki Rita Xu -- 4249 2022-11-22 01:31:56

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Academic Video Service to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
HandWiki. Ottoman Decline Thesis. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/35768 (accessed on 05 October 2026).
HandWiki. Ottoman Decline Thesis. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/35768. Accessed October 05, 2026.
HandWiki. "Ottoman Decline Thesis" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/35768 (accessed October 05, 2026).
HandWiki. (2022, November 22). Ottoman Decline Thesis. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/35768
HandWiki. "Ottoman Decline Thesis." Encyclopedia. Web. 22 November, 2022.
Ottoman Decline Thesis
Edit

The Ottoman decline thesis or Ottoman decline paradigm (Turkish: Osmanlı Gerileme Tezi) is an obsolete historical narrative which once played a dominant role in the study of the history of the Ottoman Empire. According to the decline thesis, following a golden age associated with the reign of Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent (r. 1520–1566), the empire gradually entered into a period of all-encompassing stagnation and decline from which it was never able to recover, lasting until the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire in 1923. This thesis was used throughout most of the twentieth century as the basis of both Western and Republican Turkish understanding of Ottoman history. However, by 1978, historians had begun to reexamine the fundamental assumptions of the decline thesis. After the publication of numerous new studies throughout the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s, and the reexamination of Ottoman history through the use of previously untapped sources and methodologies, academic historians of the Ottoman Empire achieved a consensus that the entire notion of Ottoman decline was a myth – that in fact, the Ottoman Empire did not stagnate or decline at all, but rather continued to be a vigorous and dynamic state long after the death of Suleiman the Magnificent. The decline thesis has been criticized as "teleological", "regressive", "Orientalist", "simplistic", and "one-dimensional", and described as "a concept which has no place in historical analysis". Scholars have thus "learned better than to discuss [it]." Despite this dramatic paradigm shift among professional historians, the decline thesis continues to maintain a strong presence in popular history, as well as academic history written by scholars who are not specialists on the Ottoman Empire. In some cases this is due to the continued reliance by non-specialists on outdated and debunked works, and in others to certain political interests benefiting from the continued perpetuation of the decline narrative.

political interests historical narrative teleological

References

  1. Darling, Revenue-Raising and Legitimacy, 3.
  2. Howard, "Genre and Myth," pp. 137–139.
  3. Darling, Revenue-Raising and Legitimacy, pp. 283–84.
  4. Cornell Fleischer. Bureaucrat and Intellectual in the Ottoman Empire: The Historian Mustafa Âli, 1541–1600, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986).
  5. Fleischer, Bureaucrat and Intellectual, 103.
  6. Douglas Howard, "Ottoman Historiography and the Literature of 'Decline' of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century," Journal of Asian History 22 (1988), pp. 52–77.
  7. Abou-El-Haj, Formation of the Modern State, pp. 20–40.
  8. "Historians of the Ottoman Empire (Chicago University)". September 2008. https://ottomanhistorians.uchicago.edu/en/historian/dimitrie-cantemir. 
  9. Cantemir, Dimitrie (1734). The history of the growth and decay of the Othman empire. J. J., and P. Knapton. https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/001239477. 
  10. Joseph von Hammer-Purgstall, Geschichte des Osmanisches Reiches, (in German) 10 vols. (Budapest: Ca. H. Hartleben, 1827–35).
  11. Darling, Revenue-Raising and Legitimacy, pp. 3–4.
  12. Contending Visions of the Middle East: The History and Politics of Orientalism (2 ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2010. pp. 62–3. 
  13. Contending Visions of the Middle East: The History and Politics of Orientalism (2 ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2010. pp. 104–12, 130–3. 
  14. Howard, "Ottoman Advice for Kings," pp. 143–44; Edward Said, Orientalism, (New York: Pantheon, 1978).
  15. Darling, Revenue-Raising and Legitimacy, 2.
  16. Bernard Lewis, "Some Reflections on the Decline of the Ottoman Empire", Studia Islamica 1 (1958) 111–127.
  17. Tezcan, Second Ottoman Empire, 242n. Hathaway, "Problems of Periodization" Darling, "Another Look at Periodization" Quataert, "Ottoman History Writing" Suraiya Faroqhi, Approaching Ottoman History: An Introduction to the Sources, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999) 180.
  18. Lewis, "Some Reflections", pp. 112–127.
  19. Sajdi, Dana (2007). "Decline, its Discontents, and Ottoman Cultural History: By Way of Introduction". in Sajdi, Dana. Ottoman Tulips, Ottoman Coffee: Leisure and Lifestyle in the Eighteenth Century. London: I.B. Taurus. pp. 4–6. 
  20. Sajdi, Dana (2007). "Decline, its Discontents, and Ottoman Cultural History: By Way of Introduction". in Sajdi, Dana. Ottoman Tulips, Ottoman Coffee: Leisure and Lifestyle in the Eighteenth Century. London: I.B. Taurus. pp. 6. 
  21. Sajdi, Dana (2007). "Decline, its Discontents, and Ottoman Cultural History: By Way of Introduction". in Sajdi, Dana. Ottoman Tulips, Ottoman Coffee: Leisure and Lifestyle in the Eighteenth Century. London: I.B. Taurus. pp. 5. 
  22. Darling, Revenue-Raising and Legitimacy, pp. 4–5.
  23. Hathaway, "Problems of Periodization," 26.
  24. Ehud Toledano (2011). "The Arabic-speaking world in the Ottoman period: A socio-political analysis". in Woodhead, Christine. The Ottoman World. Routledge. pp. 457. ISBN 978-0-415-44492-7. 
  25. Douglas Howard, "Ottoman Historiography," pp. 52–77.
  26. Abou-El-Haj, Formation of the Modern State, pp. 23–26.
  27. Cemal Kafadar, "The Myth of the Golden Age: Ottoman Historical Consciousness in the post-Süleymanic Era," in Süleyman the Second [sic] and His Time, eds. Halil İnalcık and Cemal Kafadar (Istanbul: ISIS Press, 1993), pp. 44.
  28. Rhoads Murphey, "The Veliyüddin Telhis: Notes on the Sources and Interrelations between Koçu Bey and Contemporary Writers of Advice to Kings," Belleten 43 (1979), pp. 547–571.
  29. Pál Fodor, "State and Society, Crisis and Reform, in a 15th–17th Century Ottoman Mirror for Princes," Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 40 (1986), pp. 217–240.
  30. Metin Kunt, "Introduction to Part I," 37–38.
  31. Börekçi, "Factions and Favorites."
  32. Tezcan, Second Ottoman Empire.
  33. Marc Baer, Honored by the Glory of Islam: Conversion and Conquest in Ottoman Europe, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008)
  34. Kafadar, "The Myth of the Golden Age", 37–48.
  35. Kaya Şahin, Empire and Power in the Reign of Süleyman: Narrating the Sixteenth-Century Ottoman World, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)
  36. Hakan T. Karateke, "On the Tranquility and Repose of the Sultan," in Christine Woodhead eds. The Ottoman World, (Routledge, 2011), 116. Leslie Peirce, The Imperial Harem: Women and Sovereignty in the Ottoman Empire, (Oxford University Press: 1993), 185.
  37. Peirce, The Imperial Harem, pp. 267–285.
  38. Darling, Revenue-Raising and Legitimacy, pp. 200–306.
  39. Hathaway, The Arab Lands, 9
  40. Donald Quataert, "Ottoman History Writing", 5.
  41. Salzmann, Ariel (1993). "An Ancien Régime Revisited: "Privatization" and Political Economy in the Eighteenth-Century Ottoman Empire". Politics & Society 21 (4): 393–423. doi:10.1177/0032329293021004003.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F0032329293021004003
  42. Cemal Kafadar, "On the Purity and Corruption of the Janissaries," Turkish Studies Association Bulletin 15 (1991): 273–280.
  43. Günhan Börekçi, "A Contribution to the Military Revolution Debate: The Janissaries' Use of Volley Fire During the Long Ottoman-Habsburg War of 1593–1606 and the Problem of Origins." Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 59 (2006): 407–438.
  44. Tezcan, Second Ottoman Empire, pp. 22–23.
  45. Metin Kunt, The Sultan's Servants: The Transformation of Ottoman Provincial Government, 1550–1650, (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983) 98.
  46. Ariel Salzmann, "The Old Regime and the Ottoman Middle East," in Christine Woodhead eds. The Ottoman World, (Routledge, 2011), 412.
  47. Halil İnalcık, "Military and Fiscal Transformation in the Ottoman Empire, 1600–1700," Archivum Ottomanicum 6 (1980): 283–337.
  48. Gábor Ágoston, "Firearms and Military Adaptation: The Ottomans and the European Military Revolution, 1450–1800". Journal of World History.' 25 (2014): 123.
  49. Jonathan Grant, "Rethinking the Ottoman "Decline": Military Technology Diffusion in the Ottoman Empire, Fifteenth to Eighteenth Centuries." Journal of World History 10 (1999): 179–201.
  50. Gábor Ágoston, "Ottoman Artillery and European Military Technology in the Fifteenth and Seventeenth Centuries," Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 47/1–2 (1994): 15–48.
  51. Gábor Ágoston, Guns for the Sultan: Military Power and the Weapons Industry in the Ottoman Empire, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) pp. 195–98.
  52. Ágoston, "Military Transformation," pp. 286–87.
  53. Ágoston, Guns for the Sultan, pp. 192–195.
  54. Ágoston, Guns for the Sultan, pp. 199–200.
  55. Ágoston, Guns for the Sultan, pp. 200–201.
  56. Rhoads Murphey, Ottoman Warfare: 1500–1700, (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1999), 10.
  57. Aksan, Virginia (2007). Ottoman Wars, 1700–1860: An Empire Besieged. Pearson Education Ltd.. pp. 130–5. ISBN 978-0-582-30807-7.  Woodhead, Christine (2008). "New Views on Ottoman History, 1453–1839". The English Historical Review (Oxford University Press) 123: 983. "the Ottomans were able largely to maintain military parity until taken by surprise both on land and at sea in the Russian war from 1768 to 1774.". 
  58. Quataert, Donald (2003). "Ottoman History Writing and Changing Attitudes towards the Notion of 'Decline'". History Compass 1: 2. doi:10.1111/1478-0542.038.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2F1478-0542.038
  59. Contending Visions of the Middle East: The History and Politics of Orientalism (2 ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2010. pp. 155–9, 169–70. 
  60. "Oriental despotism" was a term deployed in Marxist historical analyses. It was postulated on a vision of Middle Eastern state and society as one in which all power was concentrated in the hands of an absolute ruler, who by controlling all of the land in the empire, prevented the independent emergence of a native bourgeoisie, and thus made capitalism impossible. This concept, or others like it, long served as a foundational principle in the study of the economic history of the Ottoman Empire and of Asian societies more generally, though it was, as noted by Zachary Lockman, "in reality based on crude generalizations and a very faulty understanding of their [Asian societies'] (quite diverse) histories and social structures.[69]
  61. Sajdi, Dana (2007). "Decline, its Discontents, and Ottoman Cultural History: By Way of Introduction". in Sajdi, Dana. Ottoman Tulips, Ottoman Coffee: Leisure and Lifestyle in the Eighteenth Century. London: I.B. Taurus. pp. 12–4. 
  62. Quataert, Donald (2003). "Ottoman History Writing and Changing Attitudes towards the Notion of 'Decline'". History Compass 1: 5–6. doi:10.1111/1478-0542.038.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2F1478-0542.038
  63. Sajdi, Dana (2007). "Decline, its Discontents, and Ottoman Cultural History: By Way of Introduction". in Sajdi, Dana. Ottoman Tulips, Ottoman Coffee: Leisure and Lifestyle in the Eighteenth Century. London: I.B. Taurus. pp. 15. 
  64. Quataert, Donald (2003). "Ottoman History Writing and Changing Attitudes towards the Notion of 'Decline'". History Compass 1: 5. doi:10.1111/1478-0542.038.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2F1478-0542.038
  65. Pamuk, Şevket (2000). A Monetary History of the Ottoman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. xx. 
  66. Salzmann, Ariel (1993). "An Ancien Régime Revisited: "Privatization" and Political Economy in the Eighteenth-Century Ottoman Empire". Politics & Society 21 (4): 402. doi:10.1177/0032329293021004003.  "Crisis and Recovery: The Ottoman Monetary System in the Early Modern Era, 1550-1789". Global Connections and Monetary History, 1470-1800. Aldershot: Ashgate. 2003. p. 140. "the eighteenth century until the 1780s was a period of commercial and economic expansion coupled with fiscal stability."  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F0032329293021004003
  67. Douglas Northrop, ed (2014). "Objects in Motion". A Companion to World History. Wiley Blackwell. p. 331. 
  68. "Precious-metal Flows into India in the Early Modern Period". Global Connections and Monetary History, 1470-1800. Aldershot: Ashgate. 2003. p. 154. 
  69. Faroqhi, "Crisis and Change," 507; Jane Hathaway, "The Ottomans and the Yemeni Coffee Trade," Oriente Moderno 25 (2006): 161–171.
  70. Lewis, "Some Reflections," 113.
  71. Darling, Revenue-Raising and Legitimacy, pp. 299–306.
  72. Darling, Revenue-Raising and Legitimacy, pp. 81–118.
  73. Michael Ursinus, "The Transformation of the Ottoman Fiscal Regime, c. 1600–1850," in Christine Woodhead eds. The Ottoman World, (Routledge, 2011) 423–434.
  74. Tezcan, Second Ottoman Empire, pp. 19–23.
  75. Darling, Revenue-Raising and Legitimacy, pp. 246–80.
  76. Darling, Revenue-Raising and Legitimacy, 239.
  77. Faroqhi, Crisis and Change, 553.
  78. Carter Vaughn Findley, "Political culture and the great households", in Suraiya Faroqhi eds., The Later Ottoman Empire, 1603–1839, volume 3 of The Cambridge History of Turkey. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 66.
  79. Hathaway, Arab Lands, 59.
  80. Faroqhi, "Crisis and Change," 411–414.
  81. Geoffrey Parker, Global Crisis: War, Climate Change & Catastrophe in the Seventeenth Century, (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2013)
  82. Darling, Revenue-Raising and Legitimacy, pp. 8–10.
  83. Ursinus, "The Transformation of the Ottoman Fiscal Regime," 423.
  84. Ehud Toledano (2011). "The Arabic-speaking world in the Ottoman period: A socio-political analysis". in Woodhead, Christine. The Ottoman World. Routledge. pp. 459. ISBN 978-0-415-44492-7. 
  85. Sajdi, Dana (2007). "Decline, its Discontents, and Ottoman Cultural History: By Way of Introduction". in Sajdi, Dana. Ottoman Tulips, Ottoman Coffee: Leisure and Lifestyle in the Eighteenth Century. London: I.B. Taurus. pp. 27. 
More
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: History
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
View Times: 5.2K
Entry Collection: HandWiki
Revision: 1 time (View History)
Update Date: 22 Nov 2022
Notice
You are not a member of the advisory board for this topic. If you want to update advisory board member profile, please contact office@encyclopedia.pub.
OK
Confirm
Only members of the Encyclopedia advisory board for this topic are allowed to note entries. Would you like to become an advisory board member of the Encyclopedia?
Yes
No
${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
There is no comment~
${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
${ selectedItem.replyTextCharacter }/${ selectedItem.replyMaxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
Confirm
Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Academic Video Service