Your browser does not fully support modern features. Please upgrade for a smoother experience.
Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic. For video creation, please contact our Academic Video Service.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 handwiki Sirius Huang -- 4946 2022-11-18 01:40:02

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Academic Video Service to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
HandWiki. Response to Intervention. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/35351 (accessed on 24 September 2026).
HandWiki. Response to Intervention. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/35351. Accessed September 24, 2026.
HandWiki. "Response to Intervention" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/35351 (accessed September 24, 2026).
HandWiki. (2022, November 20). Response to Intervention. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/35351
HandWiki. "Response to Intervention." Encyclopedia. Web. 20 November, 2022.
Response to Intervention
Edit
The content is sourced from: https://handwiki.org/wiki/Social:Response_to_intervention

In education, response to intervention (commonly abbreviated RTI or RtI) is an approach to academic intervention used in the United States to provide early, systematic, and appropriately intensive assistance to children who are at risk for or already underperforming as compared to appropriate grade- or age-level standards. RTI seeks to promote academic success through universal screening, early intervention, frequent progress monitoring, and increasingly intensive research-based instruction or interventions for children who continue to have difficulty. RTI is a multileveled approach for aiding students that is adjusted and modified as needed if they are failing. In terms of identifying students with specific learning disabilities (SLD), RTI was proposed as an alternative to the ability–achievement discrepancy model, which requires children to exhibit a significant discrepancy between their ability (often measured by IQ testing) and academic achievement (as measured by their grades and standardized testing). Methods to identify students with SLD have been controversial for decades and proponents of RTI claim that the process brings more clarity to the Specific Learning Disability (SLD) category of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004), while opponents claim that RTI simply identifies low achieving students rather than students with learning disabilities.

academic intervention multileveled academic achievement

References

  1. National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: NASDSE, Inc.
  2. Rachel M. Stewart; Ronald C. Martella; Nancy E. Marchand-Martella; Gregory J. Benner (2005). "Three-Tier Models of Reading and Behavior". JEIBI 2 (3): 115–124. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ846760.pdf. 
  3. "Response to Intervention (RTI): A Primer for Parents". National Association of School Psychologists. http://www.nasponline.org/resources/handouts/revisedPDFs/rtiprimer.pdf. 
  4. Gresham, F.; Reschly, D.; Shinn, M. R. (2010). "RTI as a driving force in educational improvement: Historical legal, research, and practice perspectives". Interventions for academic achievement problems in a three-tier model, including RTI. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists. pp. 47–77. 
  5. pmhdev. "Randomized Control Trial - National Library of Medicine". https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMHT0025811/. 
  6. "Language & Math". Archived from the original on June 26, 2009. https://web.archive.org/web/20090626065701/http://www.ncld.org/ld-basics/ld-aamp-language. 
  7. "The Discrepancy Model: What You Need to Know". Understood.org. https://www.understood.org/en/school-learning/evaluations/evaluation-basics/the-discrepancy-model-what-you-need-to-know. 
  8. Gresham, F.M. (2004). "Current status and future directions of school-based behavioral interventions". School Psychology Review 33 (3): 326–343. doi:10.1080/02796015.2004.12086252.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1080%2F02796015.2004.12086252
  9. McIntosh, Kent; MacKay, Leslie D.; Andreou, Theresa; Brown, Jacqueline A.; Mathews, Susanna; Gietz, Carmen; Bennett, Joanna L. (March 2011). "Response to Intervention in Canada: Definitions, the Evidence Base, and Future Directions". Canadian Journal of School Psychology 26 (1): 18–43. doi:10.1177/0829573511400857. ISSN 0829-5735.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F0829573511400857
  10. Hale (2006) first presented a model that included Standard Protocol Model RTI at Tier 1, Problem-Solving Model RTI at Tier 2, and individualized special education at tier 3.
  11. Jenkins, J.R. (December 2003). "Candidate measures for screening at-risk students". NRCLD Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium. Kansas City, MO. http://www.nrcld.org/symposium2003/jenkins/index.html. Retrieved April 3, 2006. 
  12. "National Research Center on Learning Disabilities | LD OnLine". http://www.ldonline.org/resources_new/9749. 
  13. Deno, S. L. (1985). "Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative". Exceptional Children 52 (3): 219–232. doi:10.1177/001440298505200303. PMID 2934262.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F001440298505200303
  14. Lovett, M. W.; De Palma, M.; Frijters, J.; Steinbach, K.; Temple, M.; Benson, N.; Lacerenza, L. (2008). "Interventions for reading difficulties: A comparison of response to intervention by ELL and EFL struggling readers.". Journal of Learning Disabilities 41 (4): 333–352. doi:10.1177/0022219408317859. PMID 18560021.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F0022219408317859
  15. Suggate, S. P. (2010). "Why what we teach depends on when: Grade and reading intervention modality moderate effect size.". Developmental Psychology 46 (6): 1556–1579. doi:10.1037/a0020612. PMID 20873927.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2Fa0020612
  16. "The Short-and-Sweet IEP Overview | Center for Parent Information and Resources". http://www.parentcenterhub.org/iep-overview/. 
  17. Council of Administrators of Special Education; National Association of State Directors of Special Education; American Association of School Administrators (2010). Response to Intervention Adoption Survey. Spectrum K-12 School Solutions. p. 2. 
  18. Burns, Matthew; Appleton, James; Stehouwer, Jonathon (2005). "Meta-analysis of response-to-intervention research: Examining field-based and research-implemented models.". Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 23: 381–394. doi:10.1177/073428290502300406.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F073428290502300406
  19. Johnson, E., Mellard, D.F., Fuchs, D., & McKnight, M.A. (2006). Responsiveness to intervention (RTI): How to do it. Lawrence, KS: National Research Center on Learning Disabilities.
  20. Burns, Matthew; Gibbons, Kimberly (2012). Implementing response to intervention in elementary and secondary schools: Procedures to assure scientific-based practices (2nd ed.). Routledge. 
  21. Fuchs, D.; Mock, D.; Morgan, P. L.; Young, C. L. (2003). "Responsiveness-to-Intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct". Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 18 (3): 157–171. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00072. http://danlane.wiki.westga.edu/file/view/Fuchs+(Responsiveness+to+intervention...).pdf. 
  22. Christ, Theodore; Burns, Matthew; Ysseldyke, James (2005). "Conceptual confusion within response-to-intervention vernacular: Clarifying meaningful differences.". NASP Communique 34 (3): 1, 6–8. 
  23. null
  24. Sawyer, R.; Holland, D.. "State policies and procedures and selected local implementation practices in response to intervention in the six southeast region states". http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/southeast/pdf/REL_2008063.pdf. Retrieved Feb 6, 2015. 
  25. AE Farstrup (2007). "RTI: A vital concern for reading professionals". Reading Today 25 (3): 17. 
  26. Buffum,A., Mattos, M., & Weber,C. (2010). "The why try behind RTI: Response to Intervention flourishes when educators implement the right practices for the right reasons." Educational Leadership, Oct. 2010, 10–16
  27. Pearce, I. R. (2009). "Helping children with emotional difficulties: A response to intervention investigation". The Rural Educator 30 (2): 34–36. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ869307.pdf. 
  28. Quirk, M.; Schwaneflugel, P. J.; Webb, M. Y. (2009). "A short-term longitudinal study of the relationship between motivation to read and reading fluency skill in second grade.". Journal of Literacy Research 41 (2): 196–227. doi:10.1080/10862960902908467. PMID 20300541.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2838245
  29. Morris, R. D.; Lovett, M. W.; Wolf, M.; Sevcik, R. A.; Steinbach, K. A.; Frijters, J. C.; Shapiro, M. B. (2012). "Multiple-component remediation for developmental reading disabilities: IQ, socioeconomic status, and race as factors in remedial outcome.". Journal of Learning Disabilities 45 (2): 99–127. doi:10.1177/0022219409355472. PMID 20445204.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F0022219409355472
  30. "IDEA—the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act | Center for Parent Information and Resources". http://www.parentcenterhub.org/idea/. 
  31. Buffum, Austin; Mattos, Mike; Weber, Chris (2009). Pyramid Response to Intervention: RTI, Professional Learning Communities, and How to Respond When Kids Don't Learn. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree. https://www.solutiontree.com/products/pyramid-response-to-intervention.html. 
  32. "Q&A on Response to Intervention and Early Intervening Services". ed.gov. http://idea.ed.gov/explore/view/p/,root,dynamic,QaCorner,8,. 
  33. "Response to Intervention in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)". 2004. http://www.reading.org/downloads/resources/IDEA_RTI_report.pdf. 
  34. "The Emergence of Response to Intervention". June 11, 2019. https://www.solutiontree.com/blog/when-did-rti-start/. Retrieved 17 July 2019. 
  35. Kovaleski, J.F.; VanDerHeyden, A.M.; Shapiro, E.S. (2013). The RTI approach to evaluating learning disabilities. Guilford. ISBN 978-1-4625-1154-9. 
  36. "2010 OSERS Memorandum". http://www5.esc13.net/thescoop/special/files/2011/01/RTI-Memo-1-21-111.pdf. 
  37. Hale, J. (2010). "Critical Issues in response-to-intervention, comprehensive evaluation, and specific learning disabilities identification and intervention: An expert white paper consensus". Learning Disability Quarterly 33 (3): 223–236. doi:10.1177/073194871003300310. http://www.iapsych.com/articles/hale2010.pdf. 
  38. Richards, C. (Fall 2007). "Response to Intervention: Building the Capacity of Teachers To Serve Students with Learning Difficulties". Teacher Education 16 (2): 55–64. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ796252.pdf. 
  39. "Response to Intervention (RtI) and Gifted and Talented Education (GT)". Montana Office of Public Instruction. Fall 2009. http://www.opi.mt.gov/PDF/Gifted/RtI_GTFramework.pdf. 
  40. Hale, J.B.; Naglieri, J.A.; Kaufman, A.S.; Kavale, K.A. (2004). "Specific learning disability classification in the new Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: The danger of good ideas". The School Psychologist 58 (1): 6–14. 
  41. Reynolds, C. R.; Shaywitz, S. E. (2009). "Response to intervention: Remediation, perhaps, diagnosis, no". Child Development Perspectives 3 (1): 44–47. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00075.x. PMID 20161671.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2819473
  42. Fuchs, D.; Deshler, D. D. (2007). "What we need to know about responsiveness to intervention (and shouldn't be afraid to ask)". Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 22 (2): 129–136. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00237.x. http://danlane.wiki.westga.edu/file/view/Fuchs+(What+we+need+to+know+about...).pdf. 
  43. Barth, A. E.; Stuebing, K. K.; Anthony, J. L.; Denton, C. A.; Mathes, P. G.; Fletcher, J. M.; Francis, D. J. (2008). "Agreement among response to intervention criteria for identifying responder status". Learning and Individual Differences 18 (3): 296–307. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.04.004. PMID 19081758.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2600471
  44. Fuchs, D.; Fuchs, L. S.; Compton, D. L. (2004). "Identifying reading disabilities by responsiveness to instruction: Specifying measures and criteria". Learning Disability Quarterly 27 (4): 216–227. doi:10.2307/1593674. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ708320.pdf. 
  45. Speece, D.L. (2005). "Hitting the moving target known as reading development: Some thoughts on screening children for secondary interventions". Journal of Learning Disabilities 38 (6): 487–493. doi:10.1177/00222194050380060301. PMID 16392689.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F00222194050380060301
  46. Fuchs, D.; Fuchs, L. S. (2006). "Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it?". Reading Research Quarterly 41 (1): 93–99. doi:10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4. https://www.uv.uio.no/forskning/om/helga-eng-forelesning/introduction-to-responsivenes-to-intervention.pdf. 
  47. Richardson, Will (2010). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. https://archive.org/details/isbn_9781412959728. 
  48. Schacter, J; Fagnano (1999). "Does computer technology improve student learning and achievement? How, when, and under what conditions?". Journal of Educational Computing Research 20 (4): 329–343. doi:10.2190/vq8v-8vyb-rkfb-y5ru.  https://dx.doi.org/10.2190%2Fvq8v-8vyb-rkfb-y5ru
  49. Marzano, R (1998). "A theory-based meta-analysis of research on instruction. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning". 
  50. Collins, A; Halverson (2009). Rethinking Education in the Age of Technology. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. 
  51. "Computer-Assisted Instruction and Reading". Reading Rockets. 2013-04-24. http://www.readingrockets.org/article/computer-assisted-instruction-and-reading. 
  52. Barley, Z; Lauer, P. A.; Arens, S. A.; Apthrop, H. S.; Englert, K. S.; Snow, D.; Akiba, M (2002). Helping at-risk students meet standards: A synthesis of evidence-based classroom practices. Centennial, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning. 
  53. Grabe (2007). "Using Animation in Microsoft PowerPoint to Enhance Engagement and Learning in Young Learners with Developmental Delay". Teaching Exceptional Children: 58–65. 
  54. Parette, H; Blum, C.; Hourcade, J.J (January 2010). "Article". 
  55. "Photo Story 3 for Windows". https://download.cnet.com/Photo-Story-3-for-Windows/3000-12511_4-10339154.html. 
More
©Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons-Attribution ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Education & Educational Research
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
HandWiki
View Times: 1.5K
Entry Collection: HandWiki
Revision: 1 time (View History)
Update Date: 20 Nov 2022
Table of Contents
    Notice
    You are not a member of the advisory board for this topic. If you want to update advisory board member profile, please contact office@encyclopedia.pub.
    OK
    Confirm
    Only members of the Encyclopedia advisory board for this topic are allowed to note entries. Would you like to become an advisory board member of the Encyclopedia?
    Yes
    No
    ${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
    Submit
    Cancel
    There is no comment~
    ${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
    Submit
    Cancel
    ${ selectedItem.replyTextCharacter }/${ selectedItem.replyMaxCharacter }
    Submit
    Cancel
    Confirm
    Are you sure to Delete?
    Yes No
    Academic Video Service
    Feedback