Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 handwiki -- 1246 2022-11-17 01:42:21 |
2 format correct Meta information modification 1246 2022-11-22 04:10:47 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?


Are you sure to Delete?
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
HandWiki. Pseudophilosophy. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 14 April 2024).
HandWiki. Pseudophilosophy. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed April 14, 2024.
HandWiki. "Pseudophilosophy" Encyclopedia, (accessed April 14, 2024).
HandWiki. (2022, November 17). Pseudophilosophy. In Encyclopedia.
HandWiki. "Pseudophilosophy." Encyclopedia. Web. 17 November, 2022.

Pseudophilosophy (or cod philosophy) is a philosophical idea or system which does not meet an expected set of standards.

pseudophilosophy philosophy

1. Definitions

According to Christopher Heumann, an 18th-century scholar, pseudo-philosophy has six characteristics:[1]

  1. A preference for useless speculation
  2. It appeals merely to human authority
  3. It appeals to tradition instead of reason
  4. It syncretises philosophy with superstition
  5. It has a preference for obscure and enigmatic language and symbolism
  6. It is immoral

According to Michael Oakeshott, pseudo-philosophy "is theorizing that proceeds partly within and partly outside a given mode of inquiry."[2]

Josef Pieper noted that there cannot be a closed system of philosophy, and that any philosophy that claims to have discovered a "cosmic formula" is a pseudo-philosophy.[3] In this he follows Kant, who rejected the postulation of a "highest principle" from which to develop transcendental idealism, calling this pseudo-philosophy and mysticism.[4]

Nicholas Rescher, in The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, described pseudo-philosophy as "deliberations that masquerade as philosophical but are inept, incompetent, deficient in intellectual seriousness, and reflective of an insufficient commitment to the pursuit of truth."[5] Rescher adds that the term is particularly appropriate when applied to "those who use the resources of reason to substantiate the claim that rationality is unachievable in matters of inquiry."[5]

2. History

The term "pseudo-philosophy" appears to have been coined by Jane Austen.[6]

Ernest Newman, an English music critic and musicologist, who aimed at intellectual objectivity in his style of criticism, in contrast to the more subjective approach of other critics, published in 1897 Pseudo-Philosophy at the End of the Nineteenth Century, a critique of imprecise and subjective writing.

According to Josef Pieper, for Pythagoras, Plato and Aristotle philosophy is the human search "oriented toward wisdom such as God possesses".[3] It suggests that philosophy includes, in its essence, an orientation toward theology.[3] Pieper notes:

Thus something is being expressed here that clearly contradicts what in the modern age has become the accepted notion of philosophy; for this new conception of philosophy assumes that it is the decisive feature of philosophical thought to disentangle itself from theology, faith and tradition.[3]

3. Usage

The term is almost always used pejoratively and is often contentious, due to differing criteria for demarcating pseudophilosophy (see also: Demarcation problem).

3.1. Romanticism

According to physicist and philosopher of science Mario Bunge,

Pseudophilosophy is nonsense parading as deep philosophy. It may have existed since Lao-Tzu, but it was not taken seriously until about 1800, when the Romantics challenged the Enlightenment. By giving up rationality, they generated a lot of pseudophilosophy...[7]

For Kant, intellectual knowledge is discursive knowledge, not intuitive knowledge.[8] According to Kant, intuition is limited to the realm of senses, while knowledge is "essentially realised in the acts of researching, relating, comparing, differentiating, inferring, proving".[8] Kant criticised Romantic philosophy, which is based on feeling and intuition,[9] and not on "philosophical work":[9]

In philosophy, Kant writes, "the law of reason, of acquiring possessions through work", prevails. And because it is not work, the Romantic philosophy is not genuine philosophy – an objection that is also leveled by Kant against Plato, the "father of all rapturous fantasizing in philosophy", while it is noted, with both approval and assent, that "the philosophy of Aristotle is, by contrast, work".[10]

Kant called Romantic philosophy pseudo-philosophy, "in which one is entitled not to work, but only to heed and enjoy the oracle in oneself in order to take complete possession of that wisdom toward which philosophy aims".[8]

3.2. Mysticism

Mysticism has a long history. In the Age of Enlightenment mysticism had fallen into disrepute.[11] Kant called mysticism pseudophilosophy.[11] In the 19th century, with the rise of Romanticism, interest in mysticism was renewed. Rationalists and Lutherans wrote histories of mysticism to reject its claims, but there was a widespread interest in spiritualism and related phenomena.[11]

Interest in Eckhart's works was revived in the early nineteenth century, especially by German Romantics and Idealist philosophers.[12][13] Since the 1960s debate has been going on in Germany whether Eckhart should be called a "mystic".[14] The philosopher Karl Albert had already argued that Eckhart had to be placed in the tradition of philosophical mysticism of Parmenides, Plato, Plotinus, Porphyry, Proclus and other neo-Platonistic thinkers.[15] Heribert Fischer argued in the 1960s that Eckhart was a mediaeval theologian.[15]

3.3. German Idealism

Arthur Schopenhauer wrote the following about Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel:

If I were to say that the so-called philosophy of this fellow Hegel is a colossal piece of mystification which will yet provide posterity with an inexhaustible theme for laughter at our times, that it is a pseudophilosophy paralyzing all mental powers, stifling all real thinking, and, by the most outrageous misuse of language, putting in its place the hollowest, most senseless, thoughtless, and, as is confirmed by its success, most stupefying verbiage, I should be quite right.[16]

A hundred and fifty years after Schopenhauer's death, physicist and philosopher of science Mario Bunge recommended "avoiding the pseudo-subtleties of Hegelian dialectics",[17] and wrote of "Hegel's disastrous legacy": "It is true that Marx and Engels criticized Hegel's idealism, but they did not repudiate his cult of nonsense and his rejection of all modern science from Newton on."[18] Bunge noted,

True, Hegel tackled a number of important problems, so his work cannot be dismissed lightly. However, his work, when understandable at all, was usually wrong in the light of the most advanced science of his own time. Worse, it enshrined the equivocation that depth must be obscure.[7]

3.4. Continental Philosophy

Soccio notes that analytical inclined philosophers tend to dismiss Heidegger's philosophy as pseudophilosophy.[19] According to Christensen, Heidegger himself called the philosophy of Husserl scheinphilosophy.[20]

3.5. Scientism

Dietrich von Hildebrand used the term to critique the central place modern science is occupying in western society:

This pseudo philosophy, in which science takes the place of metaphysics and religion, more and more corrodes the life of man, making him more and more blind to the real cosmos, in all its plenitude, depth and mystery ... Today we are witnessing a revolt against the deformation expressed in this pseudo philosophy.[21]

3.6. Objectivism

Journalist Jonathan Chait used the term to criticize the work of Ayn Rand in "Ayn Rand's Pseudo-Philosophy", an article in The New Republic, in which he wrote, "She was a true amateur who insisted on seeing herself as the greatest human being who ever lived because she was almost completely unfamiliar with the entire philosophical canon."[22] Physicist and philosopher of science Mario Bunge classified Rand as a "mercenary", among those who "seek to defend or propagate a doctrine rather than an analyzing ideas or searching for new truths",[23] while science writer and skeptic Michael Shermer claimed that "it becomes clear that Objectivism was (and is) a cult, as are many other, non-religious groups".[24] The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy said of Rand, "For all her popularity, however, only a few professional philosophers have taken her work seriously."[25]

3.7. Other Uses

The term has been used against many different targets, including:

  • To criticise dogmatism in general, "which is dissolved when philosophy incorporates the scientific method"[26]
  • To criticise any philosophy in general which does not meet the criteria of analytical or positivistic philosophy[27]
  • To criticise specific philosophical schools, traditions and systems:
    • Platonism as "dogmatic metaphysics"[4][28]
    • Scholasticism[29] and Medieval philosophy[30]
    • Romantic[3][7] philosophy, which is based on feeling and intuition, not on discursive thought,[3] "giving up rationality"[7]
  • To criticise some forms of idealism:
    • German idealism,[7] especially Hegel[16][31]
    • Continental philosophy[19][32][33]
    • Positivistic philosophy[21]
  • To label entire specific political worldviews as illogical:
  • To criticise several (pseudo)sciences:
    • Social Darwinism[39]
    • Psychoanalysis[40][41][42]
  • To criticise some theistic worldviews:
    • Catholicism[43][44]
    • Mysticism[11]
    • Modern spirituality and esotericism[45]


  1. Hanegraaf 2012, p. 131-134.
  2. Nardin 2001.
  3. Pieper 2006.
  4. Baur & Dahlstrom 1999, p. 37.
  5. Honderich 1995, p. 765.
  6. Johnson & Tuite 2011.
  7. Bunge 2010, p. 260.
  8. Pieper 2006, p. 14.
  9. Pieper 2006, p. 13.
  10. Pieper 2006, p. 13-14.
  11. Clark 2013, p. 26.
  12. McGinn 2001, p. 1.
  13. Hackett 2012, p. xxvii.
  14. Hackett 2012, p. xxii.
  15. Hackett 2012, p. xxiii.
  16. Schopenhauer 1965, p. 15-16.
  17. Bunge 2010, p. 124.
  18. Bunge 2012, p. 85–86.
  19. Soccio 2011, p. 497.
  20. Christensen 2008, p. 7.
  21. Von Hildebrand 1960, p. 7.
  22. Chait, Jonathan (April 25, 2011). "Ayn Rand's Pseudo-Philosophy". Retrieved July 5, 2013. 
  23. Bunge 2012, pp. 10–11.
  24. Shermer, Michael (1993). "The unlikeliest cult in history". Skeptic 2 (2): 74–81. 
  25. Badhwar, Neera K.; Long, Roderick T. (September 19, 2016). "Ayn Rand". in Zalta, Edward N.. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 ed.). 
  26. Kearney & Rainwater 1996, p. 60.
  27. Taylor & Kelly 2013, p. 116-117.
  28. Kant called Plato's ideas "dogmatic metaphysics" and "mysticism".
  29. Nichols 1997, p. 326.
  30. Inglis 1998, p. 31, 34-35.
  31. Bunge mentions "the lunatic pronouncements of Hegel, Fichte, Schelling, and their British followers".
  32. Kritzman & Reilly 2007, p. 368.
  33. Soccio mentions Heidegger; Kritzman mentions Albert Camus.
  34. Fletcher Luther, Neumaier & Parsons 1995, p. 70.
  35. Kolinsky & Paterson 1976, p. 79.
  36. Wiener 2010, p. 76.
  37. Lepenies 2009, p. 110.
  38. In 2007, book critic Leslie Clark described Rand's fiction as "romance novels with a patina of pseudo-philosophy".
  39. Adler & Pouwels 2010, p. 545.
  40. Pigliucci & Boudry 2013, p. 206–207, 321–340.
  41. There is extensive discussion of psychoanalysis as pseudoscience in the book Philosophy of Pseudoscience, for example: "Freudian psychoanalysis uses a host of methodological principles and concepts to inflate the inferential possibilities of psychoanalytic interpretation, the cumulative effect of which is that it is hard to imagine any form of human behavior that would be at odds with the theory (this was Popper's correct intuition)."
  42. On some psychoanalysts accusing other psychoanalysts of pseudophilosophy, Clarke noted: "The 'official' Freudian view of Jung is expressed by Ernest Jones, Freud's disciple and biographer, who commented that after his early important studies in word-association techniques and in schizophrenia, Jung descended 'into pseudo-philosophy out of which he never emerged'."
  43. McGrath 2006, p. 49.
  44. Heidegger "lambastes Catholicism as a "dogmatic and casuistic pseudo-philosophy, which poses as a particular system of religion," a system that "totally excludes an original and genuine religious experience of value.
  45. Irwin and Gracia: "Philosophy needs to replace pseudo-philosophy (crystals, astrology, tarot cards)".
Subjects: Others
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to :
View Times: 1.6K
Entry Collection: HandWiki
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 22 Nov 2022