Your browser does not fully support modern features. Please upgrade for a smoother experience.
Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic. For video creation, please contact our Academic Video Service.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 handwiki Camila Xu -- 3966 2022-11-17 01:35:04

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Academic Video Service to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
HandWiki. Visual Rhetoric. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/34984 (accessed on 03 October 2026).
HandWiki. Visual Rhetoric. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/34984. Accessed October 03, 2026.
HandWiki. "Visual Rhetoric" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/34984 (accessed October 03, 2026).
HandWiki. (2022, November 17). Visual Rhetoric. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/34984
HandWiki. "Visual Rhetoric." Encyclopedia. Web. 17 November, 2022.
Visual Rhetoric
Edit

Visual rhetoric is the art of effective communication through visual elements such as images, typography, and texts. Visual rhetoric encompasses the skill of visual literacy and the ability to analyze images for their form and meaning. Drawing on techniques from semiotics and rhetorical analysis, visual rhetoric expands on visual literacy as it examines the structure of an image with the focus on its persuasive effects on an audience. Although visual rhetoric also involves typography and other texts, it concentrates mainly on the use of images or visual texts. Using images is central to visual rhetoric because these visuals help in either forming the case an image alone wants to convey, or arguing the point that a writer formulates, in the case of a multimodal text which combines image and written text, for example. Visual rhetoric has gained more notoriety as more recent scholarly work started exploring alternative media forms that include graphics, screen design, and other hybrid visual representations that does not privilege print culture and conventions. Also, visual rhetoric involves how writers arrange segments of a visual text on the page. In addition to that, visual rhetoric involves the selection of different fonts, contrastive colors, and graphs, among other elements, to shape a visual rhetoric text. One vital component of visual rhetoric is analyzing the visual text. The interactional and commonly hybrid nature of cyber spaces that usually mixes print text and visual images unable some detachment of them as isolated constructs, and scholarship has claimed that especially in virtual spaces where print text and visuals are usually combined, there is no place either for emphasizing one mode over another. One way of analyzing a visual text is to look for its significant meaning. Simply put, the meaning should be deeper than the literal sense that a visual text holds. One way to analyze a visual text is to dissect it in order for the viewer to understand its tenor. Viewers can break the text into smaller parts and share perspectives to reach its meaning. In analyzing a text that includes an image of the bold eagle, as the main body of the visual text, questions of representation and connotation come into play. Analyzing a text that includes a photo, painting, or even cartoon of the bold eagle along with written words, would bring to mind the conceptions of strength and freedom, rather than the conception of merely a bird. This includes an understanding of the creative and rhetorical choices made with coloring, shaping, and object placement. The power of imagery, iconic photographs, for instance, can potentially generate actions in a global scale. Rhetorical choices carry great significance that surpass reinforcement of the written text.  Each choice, be font, color, layout, represents a different message that author wants to portray for the audience. Visual rhetoric emphasizes images as sensory expressions of cultural and contextual meaning, as opposed to purely aesthetic consideration. Analyzing visuals and their power to convey messages is central to incorporating visual rhetoric within the digital era as nuances of choices regarding audience, purpose and genre can be analyzed within a single frame and the rationale behind designers’ rhetorical choices can be revealed and analyzed by how the elements of visuals play out altogether. Visual rhetoric has been approached and applied in a variety of academic fields including art history, linguistics, semiotics, cultural studies, business and technical communication, speech communication, and classical rhetoric. Visual rhetoric seeks to develop rhetorical theory in a way that is more comprehensive and inclusive with regard to images and their interpretations.

visual rhetoric multimodal text digital era

References

  1. The Rhetorical tradition : readings from classical times to the present. Bizzell, Patricia., Herzberg, Bruce.. Boston: Bedford Books of St. Martin's Press. 1990. pp. 22. ISBN 9780312003487. OCLC 21325600. https://archive.org/details/rhetoricaltradit00bizz/page/22. 
  2. "Mere Rhetoric: Lord Kames". https://mererhetoric.libsyn.com/lord-kames. 
  3. Roland., Barthes (1977). Image, music, text. Heath, Stephen.. New York: Hill and Wang. ISBN 978-0374521363. OCLC 3414738. https://archive.org/details/imagemusictext00bart. 
  4. Ly-Le, Tuong-Minh (August 9, 2014). "Attraction and Persuasion in Advertising - A Beginner's Guide to Visual Rhetoric". https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/20140809020040-134901798-attraction-and-persuasion-in-advertising-a-beginner-s-guide-to-visual-rhetoric/. 
  5. Hill, Charles, and Marguerite Helmers, eds. Defining Visual Rhetorics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 2004.
  6. Foss, Sonja K (2004). "Framing the Study of Visual Rhetoric: Toward a Transformation of Rhetorical Theory". in Hill, Charles A.; Helmers, Marguerite. Defining Visual Rhetorics. Taylor & Francis. pp. 303–313. doi:10.4324/9781410609977-19. ISBN 978-1-4106-0997-7. http://people.uncw.edu/atkinsa/496/Framing%20the%20Study%20of%20Visual%20Rhetoric.pdf. 
  7. Hocks, Mary E. (2003). "Understanding Visual Rhetoric in Digital Writing Environments". College Composition and Communication 54 (4): 629–656. doi:10.2307/3594188. ProQuest 220689156.  https://dx.doi.org/10.2307%2F3594188
  8. Gatta, Oriana (Fall 2013). "English 3135: Visual Rhetoric". Composition Studies 41 (2): 78–86, 139. ProQuest 1509802231.  https://search.proquest.com/docview/1509802231
  9. Kress, Gunther; Selander, Staffan (October 2012). "Multimodal design, learning and cultures of recognition". The Internet and Higher Education 15 (4): 265–268. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.12.003.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.iheduc.2011.12.003
  10. Hill, Charles. "Reading the Visual in College Writing Classes." Intertexts: Reading Pedagogy in College Writing Classrooms. Ed. Marguerite Helmers. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003.
  11. George, Diana (2002). "From Analysis to Design: Visual Communication in the Teaching of Writing". College Composition and Communication 54 (1): 11–39. doi:10.2307/1512100. ProQuest 220688073.  https://dx.doi.org/10.2307%2F1512100
  12. Ehses, Hanno. "Rhetorical Handsbook." 1988.
  13. Kress, Gunther (2010). Multimodality--a Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. New York: Routledge. ISBN 9780415320610. 
  14. Borchers, Timothy (2011). Rhetorical Theory--An Introduction. Long Grove ILL: Waveland Press. pp. 271–272. ISBN 978-1577667315. 
  15. null
  16. Lester, Paul Martin (2013-02-14) (in en). Visual Communication: Images with Messages. Cengage Learning. ISBN 9781133308645. https://books.google.com/books?id=jWkJjiNq7ZMC. 
  17. McComiskey, Bruce (1 Jan 2014). "Visual Rhetoric and the New Public Discourse". JAC: A Journal of Rhetoric, Culture, & Politics 24: 187–206. 
  18. "What Does 'Going Viral Online' Really Mean?" (in en). Lifewire. https://www.lifewire.com/what-does-it-mean-to-go-viral-3486225. 
  19. Ball, Cheryl E., author. (16 March 2018). Writer/designer : a guide to making multimodal projects. ISBN 978-1-319-05856-2. OCLC 1021051218.  http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1021051218
  20. Botha, Anneli (19 September 2012). An exploration of the conceptual relationship between design aesthetics and Aristotelian rhetoric in information visualisation (Thesis). hdl:2263/27944. //hdl.handle.net/2263%2F27944
  21. Fox, Randy (January 9, 2013). "Visual Rhetoric: An Introduction for Students of Visual Communication". https://colorado.aiga.org/2013/01/visual-rhetoric-an-introduction-for-students-of-visual-communication/. 
  22. Kienzler, D. S. (1 April 1997). "Visual Ethics". Journal of Business Communication 34 (2): 171–187. doi:10.1177/002194369703400204.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F002194369703400204
  23. Wiles, Rose; Prosser, Jon; Bagnoli, Anna; Clark, Andrew; Davies, Katherine; Holland, Sally; Renold, Emma (October 2008). Visual Ethics: Ethical Issues in Visual Research. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/421/. 
  24. Allen, Nancy (January 1996). "Ethics and Visual Rhetorics: Seeing's Not Believing Anymore". Technical Communication Quarterly 5 (1): 87–105. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq0501_6.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1207%2Fs15427625tcq0501_6
  25. McDonnell, Amber (2020). "The Ethics of Visual Rhetoric & Photo Manipulation". http://www.xchanges.org/the-ethics-of-visual-rhetoric. 
  26. Dragga, Sam; Voss, Dan (1 February 2003). "Hiding Humanity: Verbal and Visual Ethics in Accident Reports". Technical Communication 50 (1): 61–82. Gale A98055409 ProQuest 220997816. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/stc/tc/2003/00000050/00000001/art00008. 
  27. Phillips, Barbara; McQuarrie, Edward (2004). "Beyond visual metaphor: A new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising". Marketing Theory 4 (1–2): 113–136. doi:10.1177/1470593104044089. https://courses.helsinki.fi/sites/default/files/course-material/4482592/22.3_MT2004%20Phillips.pdf. 
  28. Hanauer, David (2011). "The discursive construction of the separation wall at Abu Dis: Graffiti as political discourse". Journal of Language and Politics 10 (3): 301–321. doi:10.1075/jlp.10.3.01han.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1075%2Fjlp.10.3.01han
  29. Hanauer, David (2004). "Silence, voice and erasure: psychological embodiment in graffiti at the site of Prime Minister Rabin's assassination". The Arts in Psychotherapy 31: 29–35. doi:10.1016/j.aip.2004.01.001.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.aip.2004.01.001
  30. Bates, John (1980). "The thematic content of graffiti as a nonreactive indicator of male and female attitudes". The Journal of Sex Research 16 (4): 300–315. doi:10.1080/00224498009551087.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1080%2F00224498009551087
  31. Gross, Daniel D.; Gross, Timothy D. (22 September 1993). "Tagging: changing visual patterns and the rhetorical implications of a new form of graffiti". Etc 50 (3): 250–265. Gale A14540573 ProQuest 1290169516.  https://go.gale.com/ps/anonymous?id=GALE%7CA14540573
  32. Wiens, Brianna Ivy. Home Is Where the Spray-Painted Heart Is: Graffiti as Rhetorical Resistance on Skid Row (Thesis). https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/graduate_thesis_or_dissertations/rx913q29h
  33. Ley, David; Cybriwsky, Roman (December 1974). "Urban Graffiti as Territorial Markers". Annals of the Association of American Geographers 64 (4): 491–505. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1974.tb00998.x.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-8306.1974.tb00998.x
  34. Michael Bierut, "Now You See It and Other Essays on Design." Princeton Architectural Press. New York. November 7, 2017.
  35. Huntington, Heidi (2013). "Subversive Memes: Internet Memes as a Form of Visual Rhetoric". Selected Papers of Internet Research 14. https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/spir/article/view/8886. 
  36. Blair, J. A. (2004). The rhetoric of visual arguments. In C. A. Hill & M. Helmers (Eds.) Defining visual rhetorics (pp. 41-61). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  37. Milner, Ryan (2016). The World Made Meme: Public Conversations and Participatory Media. MIT Press. ISBN 9780262034999. 
  38. Hahner, Leslie (2 February 2017). "The Riot Kiss: Framing Memes as Visual Argument". Argumentation and Advocacy 49 (3): 151–166. doi:10.1080/00028533.2013.11821790. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00028533.2013.11821790. 
  39. Shifman, Limor (2014). Memes in Digital Culture. MIT Press. pp. 89. ISBN 978-0-262-31769-6. 
  40. Mina, An Xiao (2019). Memes to Movements: How the World's Most Popular Medea is Changing Social Protest and Power. Beacon Press. ISBN 9780807056585. 
  41. Bauckhage, Christian; Kersting, Kristian; Hadiji, Fabian (28 June 2013). "Mathematical Models of Fads Explain the Temporal Dynamics of Internet Memes". Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 7 (1). https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14392. 
  42. Coscia, Michele (May 2015). "Average is Boring: How Similarity Kills a Meme's Success". Scientific Reports 4 (1): 6477. doi:10.1038/srep06477. PMID 25257730. Bibcode: 2014NatSR...4E6477C.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=4175728
  43. Mazambani, Gideon; Carlson, Maria A.; Reysen, Stephen; Hempelmann, Christian F. (30 November 2015). "Impact of Status and Meme Content on the Spread of Memes in Virtual Communities". Human Technology 11 (2): 148–164. doi:10.17011/ht/urn.201511113638.  https://dx.doi.org/10.17011%2Fht%2Furn.201511113638
  44. Nowak, Jakub (11 May 2016). "Internet meme as meaningful discourse: Towards a theory of multiparticipant popular online content". Central European Journal of Communication 9 (1): 73–89. doi:10.19195/1899-5101.9.1(16).5.  https://dx.doi.org/10.19195%2F1899-5101.9.1%2816%29.5
More
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Others
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
View Times: 2.6K
Entry Collection: HandWiki
Revision: 1 time (View History)
Update Date: 17 Nov 2022
Notice
You are not a member of the advisory board for this topic. If you want to update advisory board member profile, please contact office@encyclopedia.pub.
OK
Confirm
Only members of the Encyclopedia advisory board for this topic are allowed to note entries. Would you like to become an advisory board member of the Encyclopedia?
Yes
No
${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
There is no comment~
${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
${ selectedItem.replyTextCharacter }/${ selectedItem.replyMaxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
Confirm
Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Academic Video Service