Your browser does not fully support modern features. Please upgrade for a smoother experience.
Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic. For video creation, please contact our Academic Video Service.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 handwiki Camila Xu -- 10150 2022-11-17 01:42:43

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Academic Video Service to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
HandWiki. Realigning Election. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/34949 (accessed on 03 October 2026).
HandWiki. Realigning Election. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/34949. Accessed October 03, 2026.
HandWiki. "Realigning Election" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/34949 (accessed October 03, 2026).
HandWiki. (2022, November 17). Realigning Election. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/34949
HandWiki. "Realigning Election." Encyclopedia. Web. 17 November, 2022.
Realigning Election
Edit

In political science and political history, a realigning election (often called a critical election, political realignment, or critical realignment) is a set of sharp changes in party ideology, issues, party leaders, regional and demographic bases of power of political parties, and the structure or rules of the political system, such as voter eligibility or financing. The changes result in a new political power structure that lasts for decades, replacing an older dominant coalition. Scholars frequently invoke the concept in American elections and occasionally those of other countries. US examples include the 1896 presidential election, when the issues of the Civil War political system were replaced with those of the Populist and Progressive Era, and the 1932 election, when the Populist and Progressive Eras were replaced by the New Deal issues of New Deal liberalism and modern conservatism. Realigning elections typically separate (what are known in the field of comparative politics as) party systems—with 1828, for example, separating the First Party System and the Second Party System in the US. It is generally accepted that the United States has had five distinct party systems, each featuring two major parties attracting a consistent political coalition and following a consistent party ideology, separated by four realignments. Political realignments can be sudden (1–4 years) or can take place more gradually (5–20 years). Most often, however, particularly in V. O. Key Jr.'s (1955) original hypothesis, it is a single "critical election" that marks a realignment. By contrast, a gradual process is called a secular realignment. Political scientists and historians often disagree about which elections are realignments and what defines a realignment, and even whether realignments occur. The terms themselves are somewhat arbitrary, however, and usage among political scientists and historians does vary. In the US, Walter Dean Burnham argued for a 30–38 year "cycle" of realignments. Many of the elections often included in the Burnham 38-year cycle are considered "realigning" for different reasons. Other political scientists and quantitative elections analysts reject realignment theory altogether, arguing that there are no long-term patterns. Political scientist David R. Mayhew states, "Electoral politics is to an important degree just one thing after another ... Elections and their underlying causes are not usefully sortable into generation-long spans ... It is a Rip Van Winkle view of democracy that voters come awake only once in a generation ... It is too slippery, too binary, too apocalyptic, and it has come to be too much of a dead end." Sean Trende, senior elections analyst at RealClearPolitics, who argues against realignment theory and the "emerging Democratic majority" thesis proposed by journalist John Judis and political scientist Ruy Teixeira in his 2012 book The Lost Majority states, "Almost none of the theories propounded by realignment theorists has endured the test of time... It turns out that finding a 'realigning' election is a lot like finding an image of Jesus in a grilled-cheese sandwich – if you stare long enough and hard enough, you will eventually find what you are looking for." In May 2015, statistician and FiveThirtyEight editor-in-chief Nate Silver argued against a blue wall Electoral College advantage for the Democratic Party in the upcoming 2016 US presidential election, and in post-election analysis published in January 2017, Silver cited Trende in noting that "there are few if any permanent majorities" and both Silver and Trende argued that the "emerging Democratic majority" thesis led most news coverage and commentary preceding the election to overstate Hillary Clinton's chances of being elected.

realclearpolitics political science comparative politics

References

  1. Schafer (1991); Rosenof (2003)
  2. Reichley, A. James (2000). The Life of the Parties (Paperback ed.). Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 8–12. 
  3. DiStefano, Frank J. (2019). The Next Realignment: Why America's Parties are Crumbling and What Happens Next. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. pp. 17–18. ISBN 9781633885097. 
  4. Sundquist (1982); Rosenof (2003)
  5. George Reid Andrews; Herrick Chapman (1997). The Social Construction of Democracy. NYU Press. p. 280. ISBN 9780814715062. https://books.google.com/books?id=0uQ8DAAAQBAJ&pg=PA280. 
  6. Rodney Smith; Ariadne Vromen; Ian Cook (2012). Contemporary Politics in Australia: Theories, Practices and Issues. Cambridge UP. p. 137. ISBN 9780521137539. https://books.google.com/books?id=szc-c7hVoOAC&pg=PA137. 
  7. C. Paton (2000). World, Class, Britain: Political Economy, Political Theory and British Politics. Palgrave Macmillan UK. p. 41. ISBN 9780333981665. https://books.google.com/books?id=wdWHDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA41. 
  8. R. Kenneth Carty; William Cross; Lisa Young (2007). Rebuilding Canadian Party Politics. UBC Press. p. 20. ISBN 9780774859967. https://books.google.com/books?id=7XwtAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA20. 
  9. Silbey (1991)
  10. Michael F. Holt, The Political Crisis of the 1850s (1978)
  11. Robert J. Dinkin, Campaigning in America: A History of Election Practices (1989)
  12. Lewis L. Gould, "New Perspectives on the Republican Party, 1877–1913," American Historical Review, Vol. 77, No. 4 (Oct., 1972), pp. 1074–1082
  13. Burnham (1986)
  14. Schafer (1991)
  15. Campbell, James E. (Fall 2006). "Party Systems and Realignments in the United States, 1868-2004". Social Science History 30 (3): 359–386. doi:10.1215/01455532-2006-002.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1215%2F01455532-2006-002
  16. Barreyre, Nicolas (October 2011). "The Politics of Economic Crises: The Panic of 1873, the End of Reconstruction, and the Realignment of American Politics". The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 10 (4): 403–423. doi:10.1017/s1537781411000260.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1017%2Fs1537781411000260
  17. Mayhew (2004); Rosenof (2003); Shafer (1991)
  18. Perlstein, Rick (2008). Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-0-7432-4302-5. ; Rosenof (2003); Shafer (1991)
  19. Perlstein, Nixonland (2008);
  20. Kleppner (1981)
  21. Loughlin, Sean (July 6, 2004). "Reagan cast a wide shadow in politics". CNN. http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/06/legacy.politics/index.html. Retrieved October 15, 2016. 
  22. Troy, Gil. "The Age of Reagan | The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History". http://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-by-era/essays/age-reagan. Retrieved June 29, 2016. 
  23. Page, Susan (June 6, 2004). "USATODAY.com - Reagan's political force realigned political landscape". http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-06-05-reagan-political-landscape_x.htm. Retrieved June 29, 2016. 
  24. Rosenof (2003); Schafer (1991)
  25. Abramowitz and Saunders (1998)
  26. Krugman, Paul. The Conscience of a Liberal. New York City; W. W. Norton, 2007. Print.
  27. "Morning Joe". MSNBC. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036789/vp/32626226#32626226. Retrieved 2012-03-07. 
  28. "Opinion: despite 'autopsy,' GOP could have revival in 2014". Politico. April 7, 2013. http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/despite-autopsy-gop-could-have-revival-in-2014-89714.html. Retrieved May 22, 2013. 
  29. Jenkins et al. (2006)
  30. Ruth Murray Brown, For a Christian America: A History of the Religious Right (2002)
  31. Peter Applebome (11 November 1994). "THE 1994 ELECTIONS: THE SOUTH; The Rising G.O.P. Tide Overwhelms the Democratic Levees in the South". New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/1994/11/11/us/1994-elections-south-rising-gop-tide-overwhelms-democratic-levees-south.html. Retrieved 22 September 2014. 
  32. "Obama in Reagan's shadow". The Week. https://www.theweek.com/article/index/90200/Obama_in_Reagans_shadow. Retrieved 2012-03-07. 
  33. "End Times for Reaganism". The Week. https://www.theweek.com/article/index/90147/End_Times_for_Reaganism. Retrieved 2012-03-07. 
  34. Nichols, John (November 9, 2012). "Obama's 3 Million Vote, Electoral College Landslide, Majority of States Mandate". The Nation. http://www.thenation.com/blog/171178/obama-has-great-big-mandate-and-he-must-use-it#. Retrieved November 18, 2012. 
  35. Zeleny, Jeff; Rutenberg, Jim (November 6, 2012). "Divided U.S. Gives Obama More Time". The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/07/us/politics/obama-romney-presidential-election-2012.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0. Retrieved November 18, 2012. 
  36. Pierog, Karen. "Republicans gain big in state legislative elections | Reuters". Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/2014/11/05/us-usa-elections-states-idUSKBN0IP2HB20141105. Retrieved November 20, 2014. 
  37. "Nearly half of Americans will now live in states under total GOP control". The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/11/11/nearly-half-of-americans-now-live-in-states-under-total-gop-control/. Retrieved November 20, 2014. 
  38. "The Other GOP Wave: State Legislatures |". http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2014/11/11/the_other_gop_wave_state_legislatures__124626.html. Retrieved November 20, 2014. 
  39. Boehm, Eric. "Democrats Got Wrecked Again in State Legislative Races, and it Matters More Than You Might Think". https://reason.com/blog/2016/11/14/the-2016-election-turned-more-state-legi. Retrieved 12 August 2018. 
  40. Ray Argyle, Turning Points: The Campaigns That Changed Canada - 2011 and Before (2011) excerpt and text search 441pp https://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/B005233WJG/
  41. Behiels cites Tom Flanaganm Harpers Team: Behind the Scenes in the Conservative Rise to Power (2nd ed. McGill-Queens U.P. 2009); Chantal Hébert, French Kiss: Stephen Harpers Blind Date with Quebec (Knopf Canada, 2007); William Johnson, Stephen Harper and the Future of Canada (2nd ed. McClelland & Stewart, 2006); Lloyd Mackay, Stephen Harper: The Case for Collaborative Governance (ECW Press, 2006); Bob Plamondon, Full Circle: Death and Resurrection in Canadian Conservative Politics (Key Porter Books, 2006); and Paul Wells, Right Side Up: The Fall of Paul Martin and the Rise of Stephen Harpers New Conservatism (Douglas Gibson Books, 2007)
  42. Michael D. Behiels, "Stephen Harper's Rise to Power: Will His 'New' Conservative Party Become Canada's 'Natural Governing Party' of the Twenty-First Century?," American Review of Canadian Studies Vol. 40, No. 1, March 2010, 118–145
  43. Alan Bloomfield and Kim Richard Nossal, "Towards an Explicative Understanding of Strategic Culture: The Cases of Australia and Canada", Contemporary Security Policy, (2007) 28:2, 286 - 307 online https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13523260701489859
  44. Alain-G. Gagnon, and A. Brain Tanguay, Canadian Parties in Transition (3rd ed. 2007)
  45. Steve Patten, "The Evolution of the Canadian Party System". in Gagnon, and Tanguay, eds. Canadian Parties in Transition pp. 57–58
  46. Stephen Clarkson, The Big Red Machine: How the Liberal Party Dominates Canadian Politics (2005)
  47. Ray Argyle, Turning Points: The Campaigns That Changed Canada - 2011 and Before (2011) excerpt and text search ch 4 https://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/B005233WJG/
  48. "Scott Stinson: Redefining the Liberals not a quick process | Full Comment | National Post". Fullcomment.nationalpost.com. 2011-05-06. Archived from the original on 2012-07-14. https://archive.today/20120714211603/http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2011/05/06/scott-stinson-liberals-begin-process-of-redefinition/. Retrieved 2012-03-07. 
  49. "Conrad Black: The full measure of Harper's triumph | Full Comment | National Post". Fullcomment.nationalpost.com. http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2011/05/07/conrad-black-the-full-measure-of-harper%E2%80%99s-triumph/. Retrieved 2012-03-07. 
  50. Wells, Paul (2011-05-04). "The untold story of the 2011 election: Introduction and Chapter 1 - Paul Wells". Macleans.ca. http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/04/politics-turned-over/. Retrieved 2012-03-07. 
  51. "CBC News In Depth: Reality Check - John Gray". Cbc.ca. 2006-06-13. http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/realitycheck/gray/20060613.html. Retrieved 2012-03-07. 
  52. William Johnson, Stephen Harper and the Future of Canada (2006) pp 117–19
  53. Ray Argyle, Turning Points: The Campaigns That Changed Canada - 2011 and Before (2011) excerpt and text search ch 1 https://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/B005233WJG/
  54. Howard Cody and Jamie Gillies. "The Canadian Party System and the Leadership of Stephen Harper." The New England Journal of Political Science 8.1 (2015): 2+.
  55. "Rob Ford's approval rating at 70%: poll | Posted Toronto | National Post". News.nationalpost.com. 2011-05-05. http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/05/05/rob-fords-approval-rating-at-70-poll/. Retrieved 2012-03-07. 
  56. "This page is available to GlobePlus subscribers". Theglobeandmail.com. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/a-harper-government-would-benefit-taxpayers-rob-ford-tells-rally/article2005018/. Retrieved 2012-03-07. 
  57. Royce Koop, and Amanda Bittner, "Parties and Elections after 2011: The Fifth Canadian Party System?." in Amanda Bittner and Royce Koop, eds, Parties, Elections, and the Future of Canadian Politics (2013): 308-31.
  58. Economist May 3, 2011
  59. Lawrence Martin, "Harper's triumph: a realignment of historic proportions, Globe and Mail May 4, 2011 https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/opinion/harpers-triumph-a-realignment-of-historic-proportions/article2008719/
  60. Andrew Coyne, "The West is in and Ontario has joined it: How the election led to an unprecedented realignment of Canadian politics." Maclean's May 6 2011 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/06/a-new-power-couple/
  61. Jon H. Pammett and Christopher Dornan, eds., The Canadian Federal Election of 2015 (Dundurn, 2016).
  62. James P. Allan, and Richard Vengroff. "Party System Change in Québec: Evidence from Recent Elections." Southern Journal of Canadian Studies 6.1 (2015): 2-20.
  63. "[Robert J. Fouser South Korea’s political realignment"] (in en-GB). The Korea Herald. 2020-04-23. http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20200420000912. 
  64. "South Korea Is a Liberal Country Now" (in en-GB). Foreign Policy. 2020-04-16. https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/04/16/south-korea-is-a-liberal-country-now/. 
  65. "Korea’s right trapped in the past" (in en-GB). Asia Times. 2020-04-20. https://asiatimes.com/2020/04/koreas-right-trapped-in-the-past/. 
  66. Danner, Chas (23 April 2017). "What Pundits Are Saying About the Next Phase of the French Election". New York Magazine. https://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/04/what-pundits-are-saying-about-the-french-election.html. Retrieved 24 April 2017. 
  67. "Error: no |title= specified when using {{Cite web}}". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3pWTbGqrL8.
More
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Others
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
View Times: 7.8K
Entry Collection: HandWiki
Revision: 1 time (View History)
Update Date: 17 Nov 2022
Notice
You are not a member of the advisory board for this topic. If you want to update advisory board member profile, please contact office@encyclopedia.pub.
OK
Confirm
Only members of the Encyclopedia advisory board for this topic are allowed to note entries. Would you like to become an advisory board member of the Encyclopedia?
Yes
No
${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
There is no comment~
${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
${ selectedItem.replyTextCharacter }/${ selectedItem.replyMaxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
Confirm
Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Academic Video Service