Your browser does not fully support modern features. Please upgrade for a smoother experience.
Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic. For video creation, please contact our Academic Video Service.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 handwiki Camila Xu -- 4532 2022-11-16 01:37:19

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Academic Video Service to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
HandWiki. Jury Nullification. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/34883 (accessed on 03 October 2026).
HandWiki. Jury Nullification. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/34883. Accessed October 03, 2026.
HandWiki. "Jury Nullification" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/34883 (accessed October 03, 2026).
HandWiki. (2022, November 16). Jury Nullification. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/34883
HandWiki. "Jury Nullification." Encyclopedia. Web. 16 November, 2022.
Jury Nullification
Edit

Jury nullification is a concept where members of a trial jury find a defendant not guilty if they do not support a government's law, do not believe it is constitutional or humane, or do not support a possible punishment for breaking the law. This may happen in both civil and criminal trials. In a criminal trial, a jury nullifies by acquitting a defendant, even though the members of the jury may believe that the defendant did commit the alleged crime. This may occur when members of the jury disagree with the law the defendant has been charged with breaking, or believe that the law should not be applied in that particular case. A jury can similarly convict a defendant on the ground of disagreement with an existing law, even if no law is broken (although in jurisdictions with double jeopardy rules, a conviction can be overturned on appeal, but an acquittal cannot). A jury verdict that is contrary to the letter of the law pertains only to the particular case before it. If a pattern of acquittals develops, however, in response to repeated attempts to prosecute a statutory offence, this can have the de facto effect of invalidating the statute. A pattern of jury nullification may indicate public opposition to an unwanted legislative enactment. In the past, it was feared that a single judge or panel of government officials might be unduly influenced to follow established legal practice, even when that practice had drifted from its origins. In most modern Western legal systems, however, judges often instruct juries to act only as "finders of facts", whose role it is to determine the veracity of the evidence presented, the weight accorded to the evidence, to apply that evidence to the law as explained by the judge, and to reach a verdict; but not to question the law or decide what it says. Similarly, juries are routinely cautioned by courts and some attorneys not to allow sympathy for a party or other affected persons to compromise the fair and dispassionate evaluation of evidence. These instructions are criticized by advocates of jury nullification. Some commonly cited historical examples of jury nullification involve jurors refusing to convict persons accused of violating the Fugitive Slave Act by assisting runaway slaves or being fugitive slaves themselves, and refusal of American colonial juries to convict a defendant under English law. Juries have also refused to convict due to the perceived injustice of a law in general, or of the way the law is applied in particular cases. There have also been cases where the jury has refused to convict due to their own prejudices (for example, about the race of one of the parties in the case).

double jeopardy public opposition statute

References

  1. null
  2. Randolph N. Jonakait, The American Jury System (Yale University Press, 2006), p. 253 ISBN:0-300-12463-5, ISBN:978-0-300-12463-7
  3. Barbara J. Shapiro A Culture of Fact: England, 1550-1720, (Cornell University Press, 2003), p. 21 ISBN:0-8014-8849-4, ISBN:978-0-8014-8849-8
  4. "Recognising the Activist Juror", Deliberations: Law, news and thoughts on juries and jury trials, June 12, 2007, http://jurylaw.typepad.com/deliberations/2007/06/immigration_and.html, retrieved 4 January 2010 
  5. Lars Noah, "Civil Jury Nullification", Iowa Law Review 86 (2001): 1601
  6. Schopp, Robert F. (1995–1996), Verdicts of Conscience: Nullification and Necessity as Jury Responses to Crimes of Conscience, 69, S. Cal. L. Rev., p. 2039, http://heinonlinebackup.com/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/scal69§ion=58 
  7. Bissell, John W. (1997–1998), Comments on Jury Nullification, 7, Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, p. 51, http://heinonlinebackup.com/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/cjlpp7§ion=9 
  8. Fairfax, Roger A. (2011), Prosecutorial Nullification, Boston College Law Review, https://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_4/02_fairfax.pdf 
  9. The Stealth Juror: Reality or Rarity?, American Bar Association, archived from the original on 2008-11-21, https://web.archive.org/web/20081121134850/http://www.abanet.org/litigation/mo/premium-lt/articles/trialpractice/0707_gilleland.html 
  10. Hall Jr., John Wesley (2003), Putting on a Jury Nullification Defense and Getting Away with It 
  11. Conrad, Clay (1998), Using Theories and Themes to Acquit the Guilty 
  12. Magna Carta of 1215 http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/magnacarta.html
  13. Eduard Bernstein, Sozialismus und Demokratie in der grossen englischen Revolution (1895); trans. H. J. Stenning (1963, NYC) as Cromwell and Communism: Socialism and Democracy in the Great English Revolution, Library of Congress 63-18392.
  14. Birch, Thomas, ed (1742). "Slate Papers, 1653: August (5 of 5)". A Collection of the State Papers of John Thurloe, Volume 1, 1638-1653. London: Fletcher Gyles. pp. 435–445. http://www.british-history.ac.uk/thurloe-papers/vol1/pp435-445. Retrieved 1 December 2016. 
  15. Stettinius v. United States, Federal Case No. 13,387 (C.Ct. D.C. 1839), 22 Federal Cases 1322, 1333 quoting United States v. Fenwick, Federal Case No. 15,086 (1836).
  16. Judgments of the Supreme Court of Canada. R. v. Latimer 2001-01-18 . Retrieved April 06, 2014. http://scc.lexum.org/en/2001/2001scc1/2001scc1.html
  17. Judgments of the Supreme Court of Canada. R. v. Morgentaler 1988-01-28. Retrieved April 06, 2014. https://archive.is/20130415063041/http://scc.lexum.org/en/1988/1988rcs1-30/1988rcs1-30.html
  18. Judgments of the Supreme Court of Canada. R. v. Krieger 2006-10-26 . Retrieved April 06, 2014. http://scc.lexum.org/en/2006/2006scc47/2006scc47.html
  19. Bushell's Case trial report . http://www.constitution.org/trials/bushell/bushell.htm
  20. Simon Stern, "Between Local Knowledge and National Politics: Debating Rationales for Jury Nullification after Bushell's Case" , Yale Law Journal 111 (2002): 1815-48. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1008417
  21. Abramson, Jeffrey (1994). We, The Jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. pp. 68–72. ISBN 0-674-00430-2. 
  22. Crosby, Kevin (2016). "Before the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015: juror punishment in nineteenth- and twentieth-century England". Legal Studies 36 (2): 179. doi:10.1111/lest.12098. https://www.academia.edu/33924828/Before_the_Criminal_Justice_and_Courts_Act_2015_Juror_Punishment_in_Nineteenth-and_Twentieth-Century_England_2016_36_2_Legal_Studies_179. 
  23. Martin Rosenbaum "Clive Ponting case: Where is the investigators' report?" BBC News. 18 May 2011. Retrieved on 13 June 2013. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-13430012
  24. McKnight, Aaron. "Jury Nullification as a Tool to Balance the Demands of Law and Justice". http://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2890&context=lawreview. Retrieved 10 December 2014. 
  25. UMKC . http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/zenger/nullification.html
  26. Clay, Conrad J. (February 5, 2003). "A Guide to Surviving as a Juror". http://www.counterpunch.org/2003/02/05/a-guide-to-surviving-as-a-juror/. 
  27. "Legal Culture, Wild Bill Hickok and the Gunslinger Myth" University of Texas Tarlton Law Library http://tarlton.law.utexas.edu/lpop/etext/ucla/lubet48.htm
  28. O'Connor, Richard (1959). Wild Bill Hickok p. 85.
  29. Gary Collison, "'This Flagitious Offense': Daniel Webster and the Shadrach Rescue Cases, 1851-1852", New England Quarterly Vol. 68, No. 4 (December 1995), pp. 609-625 in JSTOR https://www.jstor.org/stable/365877
  30. Conrad, Clay S. (1998). Jury Nullification, The Evolution of a Doctrine, Carolina Academic Press, pp. 167–185. ISBN:0890897026.
  31. Fukurai, Hiroshi, and Richard Krooth (2003). Race in the jury box: affirmative action in jury selection. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press. p. 178. OCLC 872139501 https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/872139501
  32. Clay, Conrad J.. "Doing Your Best as a Trial Juror: Surviving Voir Dire". http://fija.org/docs/BR_YYYY_surviving_voir_dire.pdf. 
  33. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/jury080299.htm
  34. Sparf v. United States, 156 U.S. 51 (1895). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/156/51/
  35. "... the court can also attempt to prevent such an occurrence of juror nullification by (1) informing prospective jurors at the outset that jurors have no authority to disregard the law and (2) obtaining their assurance that they will not do so if chosen to serve on the jury." People v. Estrada, 141 Cal.App.4th 408 (July 14, 2006. No. C047785).
  36. U.S. vs Moylan, 417 F 2d 1002, 1006 (1969) http://www.askthelawguy.info/images/moylan.pdf
  37. U.S. v Dougherty http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/juryseminar/USvDougherty1972.html
  38. "Juries Can Acquit the Guilty, 9th Circuit Says, but 'There Is No Right to Nullification'" (in en). Reason.com. 2017-06-20. https://reason.com/blog/2017/06/20/although-juries-can-acquit-the-guilty-9t. 
  39. PAULA L. HANNAFORD-AGOR AND VALERIE P. HANS (26 August 2003). "NULLIFICATION AT WORK? A GLIMPSE FROM THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR STATE COURTS STUDY OF HUNG JURIES". http://www.ncsc-jurystudies.org/~/media/Microsites/Files/CJS/What%20We%20Do/Nullification_Final.ashx. Retrieved 9 January 2018. 
  40. Tuccille, J.D. (June 29, 2012), New Hampshire Adopts Jury Nullification Law, Reason Magazine, http://reason.com/blog/2012/06/29/new-hampshire-adopts-jury-nullification 
  41. "New Hampshire Supreme Court Nullifies Jury Nullification Statute". Fully Informed Jury Association. https://web.archive.org/web/20171030041036/https://fija.org/2014/10/24/new-hampshire-supreme-court-nullifies-jury-nullification-statute. Retrieved 30 October 2017. 
More
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Others
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
View Times: 2.5K
Entry Collection: HandWiki
Revision: 1 time (View History)
Update Date: 16 Nov 2022
Notice
You are not a member of the advisory board for this topic. If you want to update advisory board member profile, please contact office@encyclopedia.pub.
OK
Confirm
Only members of the Encyclopedia advisory board for this topic are allowed to note entries. Would you like to become an advisory board member of the Encyclopedia?
Yes
No
${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
There is no comment~
${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
${ selectedItem.replyTextCharacter }/${ selectedItem.replyMaxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
Confirm
Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Academic Video Service