Your browser does not fully support modern features. Please upgrade for a smoother experience.
Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic. For video creation, please contact our Academic Video Service.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 handwiki Camila Xu -- 3644 2022-11-11 01:45:23

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Academic Video Service to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
HandWiki. Proofs of Fermat's Theorem on Sums of Two Squares. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/33999 (accessed on 20 September 2026).
HandWiki. Proofs of Fermat's Theorem on Sums of Two Squares. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/33999. Accessed September 20, 2026.
HandWiki. "Proofs of Fermat's Theorem on Sums of Two Squares" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/33999 (accessed September 20, 2026).
HandWiki. (2022, November 11). Proofs of Fermat's Theorem on Sums of Two Squares. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/33999
HandWiki. "Proofs of Fermat's Theorem on Sums of Two Squares." Encyclopedia. Web. 11 November, 2022.
Proofs of Fermat's Theorem on Sums of Two Squares
Edit

Fermat's theorem on sums of two squares asserts that an odd prime number p can be expressed as with integer x and y if and only if p is congruent to 1 (mod 4). The statement was announced by Girard in 1625, and again by Fermat in 1640, but neither supplied a proof. The "only if" clause is easy: a perfect square is congruent to 0 or 1 modulo 4, hence a sum of two squares is congruent to 0, 1, or 2. An odd prime number is congruent to either 1 or 3 modulo 4, and the second possibility has just been ruled out. The first proof that such a representation exists was given by Leonhard Euler in 1747 and was complicated. Since then, many different proofs have been found. Among them, the proof using Minkowski's theorem about convex sets and Don Zagier's short proof based on involutions have appeared.

involutions perfect square prime number

References

  1. Euler à Goldbach, lettre CXXV http://www.math.dartmouth.edu/~euler/correspondence/letters/OO0852.pdf
  2. De numerus qui sunt aggregata duorum quadratorum. (Novi commentarii academiae scientiarum Petropolitanae 4 (1752/3), 1758, 3-40) [1]
  3. Demonstratio theorematis FERMATIANI omnem numerum primum formae 4n+1 esse summam duorum quadratorum. (Novi commentarii academiae scientiarum Petropolitanae 5 (1754/5), 1760, 3-13) [2]
  4. The summary is based on Edwards book, pages 45-48.
  5. Nouv. Mém. Acad. Berlin, année 1771, 125; ibid. année 1773, 275; ibid année 1775, 351.
  6. A. David Christopher, A partition-theoretic proof of Fermat’s Two Squares Theorem”, Discrete Mathematics, 339 (2016) 1410–1411.
More
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Others
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
View Times: 7.9K
Entry Collection: HandWiki
Revision: 1 time (View History)
Update Date: 11 Nov 2022
Notice
You are not a member of the advisory board for this topic. If you want to update advisory board member profile, please contact office@encyclopedia.pub.
OK
Confirm
Only members of the Encyclopedia advisory board for this topic are allowed to note entries. Would you like to become an advisory board member of the Encyclopedia?
Yes
No
${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
There is no comment~
${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
${ selectedItem.replyTextCharacter }/${ selectedItem.replyMaxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
Confirm
Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Academic Video Service