You're using an outdated browser. Please upgrade to a modern browser for the best experience.
Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic. For video creation, please contact our Academic Video Service.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 Sunday Joy Olakanmi -- 4987 2022-11-04 12:41:45 |
2 format Jason Zhu Meta information modification 4987 2022-11-07 03:13:43 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Academic Video Service to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Olakanmi, S.J.;  Jayas, D.S.;  Paliwal, J. Blending Pulse and Wheat Flours on Baked Goods. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/33062 (accessed on 06 December 2025).
Olakanmi SJ,  Jayas DS,  Paliwal J. Blending Pulse and Wheat Flours on Baked Goods. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/33062. Accessed December 06, 2025.
Olakanmi, Sunday Joy, Digvir S. Jayas, Jitendra Paliwal. "Blending Pulse and Wheat Flours on Baked Goods" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/33062 (accessed December 06, 2025).
Olakanmi, S.J.,  Jayas, D.S., & Paliwal, J. (2022, November 04). Blending Pulse and Wheat Flours on Baked Goods. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/33062
Olakanmi, Sunday Joy, et al. "Blending Pulse and Wheat Flours on Baked Goods." Encyclopedia. Web. 04 November, 2022.
Blending Pulse and Wheat Flours on Baked Goods
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/foods11203287

Bread is one of the most widely consumed foods in all regions of the world. Wheat flour being its principal ingredient is a cereal crop low in protein. The protein content of a whole grain of wheat is about 12–15% and is deficit in some essential amino acids, for example, lysine. Conversely, the protein and fibre contents of legume crops are between 20 and 35% and 15 and 35%, respectively, depending on the type and cultivar of the legume. The importance of protein-rich diets for the growth and development of body organs and tissues as well as the overall functionality of the body is significant. The addition of plant-based protein flours has been shown to produce an improved quality characteristic, especially the nutritional quality aspect of bread.

food quality composite flour baking characteristics quality characteristics

1. Wheat Flour

Wheat is a cereal crop which accounts for one-fifth of the calories consumed by humans all over the world [1][2]. The wheat kernel is made up of three components: (i) the endosperm, which constitutes about 80–85% of the kernel and is rich in protein and starch), and (ii) the germ (or embryo), which makes up about 2–3% of the kernel and is rich in protein, fat, vitamins and (iii) the bran, which constitutes about 13–17% of the kernel and rich in fibre. Wheat flour is a powder obtained from the grinding and sifting of wheat grains [1].
The milling process is designed to produce mainly white flour. White or refined flours are generally obtained from wheat grains containing only the endosperm (i.e., both the bran and the germ have been removed). Whole wheat flour on the other hand is made from whole wheat grains (i.e., all three components are milled together to produce the flour). Germ flours are made from both the endosperm and germ with the exclusion of the bran [3]. Hardness is the term used to describe the resistance of the endosperm to grinding. The starch granules are generally closely packed in the protein matrix and adherence between starch and protein is usually strong in hard wheat. Most hard wheat varieties are known to contain a higher amount of protein than do most soft wheat flours but protein concentration does not necessarily depend on hardness as it differs remarkably within a class and even within a given cultivar [2]. With respect to the gluten content, wheat flour is categorized as “soft” or “weak” if the gluten content is low (7–12%) and “hard” or “strong” when the gluten content is high (12–18%). Hard kinds of wheat are generally suitable for bread making due to the large amount and great quality of gluten formed when mixed with water whereas soft kinds of wheat are particularly better for cakes, pastries and cookies [3].
The endosperm, which is the main component of white flour consists of two types of proteins: gluten proteins and water-soluble proteins. The gluten proteins account for about 85% of wheat protein and the remainder is the water-soluble proteins. This combination is responsible for the unique bread-making properties of wheat flour [4]. The two major proteins present in gluten are gliadin and glutenin. Based on their chemical characteristics, gliadins and glutenins have some similarities and differences. They both contain a high amount of glutamine and proline and a low amount of lysine, though the gliadins tend to have more glutamic acid, proline and amino acids with hydrophobic side chains and a slightly lower content of basic amino acids than do the glutenins [5]. Glutenins; however, have a much higher molecular weight than gliadins. Gliadin molecules are compact because of intramolecular disulphide bonding but glutenin molecules are relatively extended and highly associated because of intermolecular disulphide bonding. Gliadins and glutenins both have a high water-absorbing capacity. Both together take up nearly three times their weight of water. Gliadins, when hydrated separately, become sticky and readily extensible. Glutenins are both cohesive and elastic. However, when hydrated together, they produce gluten; which is a viscoelastic network. Albumins and globulins are water-soluble proteins of wheat endosperm. Together they constitute only 10–15% of the total protein. Their major contribution to baking quality lies in the enzymes. Some of the enzymes include amylases (β-amylases and α-amylases) and other proteolytic enzymes, e.g., lipoxidase, lipases, and phytase [6].
Wheat flour has been used for different purposes. The presence of gluten, the dough-forming constituent of wheat flour, accounts for its applications in the production of leavened products [4]. With the addition of water to the wheat flour, a dough with unique rheological characteristics with the ability to retain gas bubbles is formed. This also accounts for its viscoelastic and thermosetting properties. Additionally, the baking characteristics of wheat flour are a function of the gluten protein [7]. Because of these unique properties, wheat flour has been used for making bread, noodles, pasta, cookies and cakes and is more popular than any other cereal grain for use in baked goods.
Despite the great properties of wheat flour and its suitability for bread making, research has shown that it contains a lower amount of health-promoting bioactive molecules like vitamins, β-carotene, polyphenols, dietary fibre and flavonoids [8]. Additionally, some adverse reactions are associated with the consumption of gluten-rich products (gluten protein), especially in people with celiac disease [7]. For these people, the most effective method of treatment is strict abstinence from foods containing gluten proteins [9]. Efforts have been made globally to explore alternative flours that could partially or completely replace wheat flour in the production of wheat flour-based products [10].

2. Composite Flours

Composite flour is described as a mix of flours, starches and other ingredients in which wheat flour is completely or partly replaced with flours from other sources in bakery and pastry products. This can be a mixture of two or three kinds of flour from either plant or animal sources with or without the addition of wheat flour [11]. These flours have economic potential for both developing and developed countries and make a substantial nutritional contribution [2]. Common plant-based flours that have been used for the production of wheat flour-based products in different parts of the world include different legumes/pulses [12][13][14][15][16], different cereal crops [17][18][19][20] and some roots and tuber crops [21][22][23][24].

2.1. Use of Legumes and Pulses in Bread Baking and Pastry Foods

Legumes are defined as the edible seeds of the family Leguminosae or Fabaceae, the second-largest family of seed plants containing 600 genera and about 13,000 species. The word ‘pulses’ (also called grain-legumes) is derived from the Latin word, puls, meaning ‘a pottage made of meal’. One of the most important characteristics of legumes is the presence of high amounts of proteins. These proteins have high lysine content, an essential amino acid needed by the body. Proteins in legumes are deficient in Sulphur-containing amino acids, making them an excellent addition to other commonly used cereal proteins (e.g., wheat) which are low in lysine, but rich in Sulphur amino acid content [11][13][25]. Pulses are also known as a great source of bioactive compounds which have tremendous advantages to human health in addition to substances that have exceptional functional properties to foods and food commodities [13][26].
Nutritionally, pulses contain a relatively high amount of protein (20–35%) and fibre (15–20%) as compared with cereal grains and lower amounts of fats (below 10%) [27]. Globally, soybeans are the most commonly consumed legume crop, followed by peanuts, dry beans, dry peas, chickpeas, cowpea, faba beans, lentil, pigeon pea, navy beans, pinto beans, miscellaneous beans, lupin, and Bambara beans [28][29].
Different legumes have been blended with wheat and other cereal flour to produce different kinds of bakery and pastry products. Notably include:
Faba beans (Vicia faba) (also known as broad beans or fava beans) which has been used to produce bread [30], spaghetti [15], corn-based pasta-like products [31] and pasta [32].
Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) (also called black-eyed peas, southern peas, or crowder peas) is used in the production of bread [33] and macaroni [34].
Soybean (Glycine max) has high lysine content and this makes it an ideal crop to improve the essential amino acids profile when blended with cereal crops. It has been used to produce bread [35], noodles [36] and pasta [16].
Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranean) has been used in the production of bread [37] and pasta [38].
Mesquite flour is defined as a sweet and aromatic product produced from milling the whole ripe fruit of the mesquite tree (Prosopis spp.). Bigne et al. (2018) used mesquite flour at 150–350 g/kg mixed with wheat flour at 850–650 g/kg to produce composite sweet bread [39].
Lentil (Lens culinaris) was used by Perri et al. (2021) to produce bread. They used a blend of wheat flour and sourdough made from whole and sprouted lentil flour. They reported that processes like fermentation and germination are potential approaches to enhance the use of legumes in novel foods [40]. Other products that have been produced with a blend of lentil flour include cake [41] and cookies [14].
Yellow pea flour (Pisum sativum) has been used to produce biscuits [42].
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) has been used to produce bread [25][43], cake [44], spaghetti [45], pasta [46] and noodles [47].
Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) was used to produce spaghetti pasta with a blend of Mexican common bean flour and semolina [48].
Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) is also one of the nutritionally important legumes of the tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Its application for pastry products was explored by Rafiq et al. (2017) who produced pasta from semolina flour substituted with legume flour and brown rice flour using a hot extrusion process (twin screw extruder) [49].

Rheological Characteristics of Dough and Impacts of Protein Substitution on Dough Characteristics

Rheology is defined as the study of the deformation and flow of materials. It involves the study of how a given material reacts to applied stress or strain. Different instruments used to measure the rheological properties of dough include a penetrometer, consistometer, amylograph, farinograph, mixograph, extensigraph, retetexturom, maturograph, oven-rise recorder and alveograph. The results of these empirical tests depend on the instrument type, the geometry and size of the sample being tested and the conditions under which the test was carried out. Bread doughs are known to exhibit viscoelastic and shear thinning properties, combining the properties of Hookean solids and non-Newtonian viscous liquids. Dough exhibits a non-linear rheological characteristic, but when subjected to minimal strain produces a linear behaviour. The extent of low strain that a dough exhibits linearity is a function of the dough type and the methods of mixing and testing [50].
The storage modulus defines the elastic properties of a sample and the loss modulus defines the viscous properties of a sample [50][51].
Gluten, the principal protein present in wheat dough exhibits viscoelastic properties where the gliadin portion represents viscous property and the glutenin components represent elastic behavior resulting from the variation in their molecular sizes. Increasing the protein in dough produces higher consistency and improving intermolecular cross-linkage lead to higher G′ and a reduced loss tangent in the dough. The relationships (which include physical and chemical attractions) among the protein molecules significantly contribute to the rheological characteristics of dough [50]. The rheological property of wheat gluten is the basis of its functional properties and makes it different from all other commercially available plant proteins. These properties allow it to be used to produce bread, cakes, biscuits and noodles [52]. Rheological characteristics of dough also have a profound impact on the quality of the product as well as process efficiency. These properties can be correlated to the mechanical properties and the specific volume of bakery products. The mechanical properties (e.g., compression, tension, shear) of bread crumbs are important for periodic quality assurance in the baking industry and to assess the impact of changes in dough ingredients and baking conditions. The compression test, which is a measure of bread firmness is used to evaluate the mechanical properties of bread crumbs and it relates to the subjective methods of touch or mouthfeel. This property has been demonstrated to have a positive correlation with the sensory attributes of the baked product. Tensile test on the other hand is hardly used to measure the mechanical properties of bread and other spongy foods because it is challenging to grip the food sample, inability to meet compliance at the grips and inability to obtain the size, shape and stiffness stipulated for the test in those food materials [53]. It has been established that the texture and density of baked goods for instance bread and cakes are influenced by variations in their rheology and vapour content during baking [54].
The dough rheology and quality of bread depend largely on the starch-protein complex, and most importantly, the presence of gluten. The addition of non-wheat flour for baked goods can have negative effects on the gluten network, leading to weakened bread dough and degradation in bread quality characteristics [55]. The major problem with non-wheat grain flours is the result of their weak dough viscoelastic and gas-holding properties resulting from the lack of gluten [56].
Water absorption capacity is an essential property that indicates a flour’s ability to absorb water and produce dough of excellent consistency. The impact of legumes/pulses addition on the water absorption capacity of dough has been extensively studied. The addition of chickpea, soybean, common bean, fava bean and lentil flours to wheat flour has been reported to increase the water absorption capacity of dough compared to wheat dough [25][57][58][59]. This can be attributed to the water absorption capacity of the gluten, protein particle entrapment inside the gluten network structure and the likely relationship between the gluten and some of the legume proteins probably present on the outer surface of the hydrated particles [25][57].
The addition of the enzyme transglutaminase has been reported to reinforce the protein network and induced a significant increase in the water absorption capacity of rice flour, soy flour and pea protein isolate blends, producing a synergetic effect and a reduction in the storage (G′) and viscous (G′′) moduli. The main function of the enzyme transglutaminase is to covalently crosslink proteins through the association between an ε-amino group on protein-bound lysine residues and a γ-carboxamide group on protein-bound glutamine residues. [12]. Different processing methods like heat treatments and germination have been shown to positively influence the functional properties of both legumes and cereal seeds [60][61]. The toasting of yellow peas flour resulted in improved dough water absorption capacity and enhanced stability of the dough, giving rise to bread with increased specific volume and loaf density comparable with 100% wheat flour control [62].
The inclusion of wheat-lupin protein isolates has been reported to enhance the development time of dough, its strength and resistance to deformation and extensibility. This was a result of the lupin particle entrapped inside the gluten network structure, and a likely correlation between the gluten and some of the lupin proteins present in the outer part of the moistened particles [63]. The inclusion of chickpea flour with wheat flour in the production of bread increased in development time of dough, while there was a reduction in the extensibility and the deformation resistance of dough. The topmost part of the wheat dough as well as the blend with 10% chickpea flour were categorized as “normal”, nevertheless, the blend containing 20 and 30% resulted in a “sticky” dough surface. The chickpea addition improved the dough development time and stability and the extensograph properties of the dough [25]. Adding chickpea, lentil and bean flour to wheat flour leads to an improvement in the development time of the dough and a reduction in dough stability [26][59]. Olapade and Oluwole (2013) reported a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the functional characteristics, excluding the bulk density and swelling capacity of composite flour produced from wheat flour partially substituted with 10% acha flour and 0–15% cowpea flour compared with that produced from 100% wheat flour [33].
According to Kahraman et al. (2018), raw, roasted and dehulled chickpea flours increased the viscous and elastic moduli of rice-based dough, leading to a good structuring of the dough. A reduced retrogradation tendency of the slurry comprising chickpea flours was also confirmed by the viscoamylographic test. This is a promising outcome for baking food applications [64]. Baiano et al. (2011) reported that the substitution of semolina with toasted and partly defatted soy flour resulted in dough weakening and an increase in the tenacity-extensibility ratio. The authors reported that the struggle for water in soy proteins with starch and gluten positively influenced the spaghetti with respect to cooking and overcooking resistance, compensating for the deleterious impacts resulting from the partial decrease in the gluten network and the resulting dough weakening [65].
Other processing techniques such as the usage of food hydrocolloids, enzymes, and sourdough fermentation have been demonstrated to improve the functionality of the dough and bread textural quality of pan-type bread produced from non–wheat flours [56]. The inclusion of hydrocolloids with different chemical structures in the production of noodle-based goods has been proposed to enhance the textural properties of noodles in addition to compensating for the decreased quality of the final products as a result of the reduced gluten content [66]. The addition of a low level of Artemisia sphaerocephala Krasch gum (ASKG) (0.03–0.5%) caused a significant improvement in the viscoelastic characteristics of the composite dough system, followed by a reduced trend at a higher level of gum inclusion (0.8%). Addition of the gum at 0.03–0.5% increased dough G′/G″ values. The addition of 0.3% of the gum resulted in a relatively denser and more arranged network structure of the dough while 0.5% and 0.8% of the gum resulted in the disruption of the strong network with visible signs of starch deformation [67]. Therefore, hydrocolloids are very useful for improving the quality of dough made from mixtures of wheat flour and non-wheat flour.
In addition, Wang et al. (2018) reported that the addition of microbial dextran (synthesized in situ from W. confusa) to faba beans sourdough containing dextran improved the viscoelastic properties of the dough, improved the specific volume, and decreased crumb hardness of the bread produced as compared with the unblended sample [68]. Marco & Rosell (2008) reported a decrease in the storage (G′) and viscous (G″) moduli when different structuring agents: hydroxypro- pylmethylcellulose and a processing aid; transglutaminase were used to modify the rheological properties of soybean-enriched rice doughs [12]. Huang et al. (2019) also reported that rheological assessment showed that the inclusion of tempeh flour (TF) increased G′ and G″ moduli of dough. They concluded that the addition of tempeh flour increased the volume and viscoelastic characteristics of the dough. It also led to a reduction in moisture migration rate and water loss in bread crumbs [69].
In addition, it has been shown that there is a need for the inclusion of different additives to the blends to obtain the desired gluten-like structure when non-wheat flour is used for bread making. The classes of additives used in breadmaking include oxidants/reductants (e.g., Azodicarbonamide, Ascorbic acid), emulsifiers (e.g., Mono- and diglycerides, Diacetyl tartaric acid esters of mono- and diglycerides, Lactylates: calcium stearoyl-lactylate and sodium stearoyl-lactylate) and hydrocolloids (e.g., Xanthan gum, Guar gum) [70] For example, β-conglycinin concentrate, which is obtained after fractionation of soybean proteins was assessed in a lean system in which other additives were not used in the production of bread. The bread produced had greater 2D area, height, softness and cohesiveness in comparison with vital gluten bread [70]. The addition of 10% β-conglycinin concentrate produced from defatted soybean flour to rice flour on bread quality characteristics was studied by Espinosa-Ramírez et al. (2018). They reported that the inclusion of 10% β-conglycinin concentrate in rice flour formulation for bread making led to bread comparable to vital gluten bread. From the micrograph analysis, they reported that the inclusion of β-conglycinin created a net-like structure comparable to the one created by gluten, affirming the capability of β-conglycinin of behaving as a structuring agent and an improver of protein quality in gluten-free bread preparations [7].

Impacts of Protein Substitution on Baking Characteristics of Bread

Baking creates sequences of chemical, physical, and biochemical reactions, producing different changes in the end product characteristics such as volume enlargement, moisture evaporation, formation of porous structure, protein denaturation, starch gelatinization, formation of crust and browning reaction, protein cross-linking, melting of fat and crystals and their incorporation into the outer layers of air cells, gas cells rupture and fragmentation of cell walls [71][72][73]. The combined processes of gas production, moisture evaporation and change in the rheological properties of the dough results in gas retention loss, transforming the dough’s foam structure into an open sponge structure of bread with interconnected cells. There is a continuous modification of the bread flour because of these activities until the structure of the final product is achieved. Factors affecting this stage include temperature, humidity and the duration of baking [72]. Other changes that occur in bread during baking are changes in physical dimensions (i.e., volume, height, width and length of the bread loaf), texture modification and moisture changes, colour modification and flavour generation [71]. It has been reported that excess of some ingredients, for example reducing sugars similar to amino acids improved the nonenzymatic Maillard browning reactions, leading to the formulation of crust and darkening.
In addition, functional characteristics of food proteins such as the ability to foam and water retention can be improved with heat treatment in the presence of sugars; complex carbohydrates by the process known as the Maillard reaction [74][75]. The denatured whey protein has been demonstrated to enhance the baking performance and texture of wheat bread dough [76]. 

Impacts of Protein Substitution on Bread Quality Characteristics

Quality is defined as the combination of distinguishing characteristics and properties of a food commodity that can determine its degree of acceptance by a user or consumer [77]. Bread quality depends greatly on consumers’ perception, which is a function of different factors including the social, demographic and environment of an individual. Bread quality can be grouped into different subcategories: (i) instrumental attributes–features that can be objectively measured, (ii) sensory attributes–features that relate to consumers’ perceptions or judgement and (iii) nutritional attributes–those related to health-promoting effects and functionality of the bread [71][78]. Sensory attributes are usually correlated and compared to objective physical measurements [71].
Examples of different attributes of bread that can be objectively measured and have been quantified to determine the quality of bread include volume (using rapeseed dis-placement), specific weight, specific volume, moisture content, water activity, crust and crumb colour, crust crispiness, crumb hardness, cell distribution within the loaf slice using image analysis, and volatile composition. The attributes related to sensory sensations of bread include visual appearance, taste, odour and tactile and oral texture [78]. The impacts of protein substitution on the quality characteristics of bread have been extensively studied. Partial substitution of wheat flour with legume-based proteins had effects on the nutritional/proximate, physical and sensory quality characteristics of bread.

2.2. Use of Other Cereals for Bread Making and Other Pastry Products

Cereals are grass crops grown for the edible components of their grains. They are regarded as staple foods and an essential source of micronutrients such as vitamins, minerals and macronutrients such as proteins, carbohydrates, fibre, crude fats, and essential fatty acids, which perform important functions in the health of humans. The extensively consumed grains are wheat, maize, rice, and barley while minimally consumed grains are rye, sorghum, quinoa, oat, and millet [79][80]. Cereal flour is mostly utilized to produce baked products such as bread, cakes, pastries, and cookies also including additional food commodities such as spaghettis, noodles, confectionery products, and infant foods [81].
Among the commonly studied cereal crops used to produce bread and other pastry products is sorghum. The addition of sorghum flour has been reported to result in a gradual decrease in composite bread [82][83]. This is due to low down amounts of the dough’s gluten network, resulting in a reduction in the ability of the dough to rise; as a result of the weaker cell wall structure leading to bread having low specific volume when contrasted with wheat flour bread [84]. Bread produced entirely from sorghum needed an alternative bread-production improvement and the addition of hydrocolloids [85]. Jafari et al. (2018) produced dough and bread using sorghum-wheat composite flour and added xanthan gum at 0.5 and 1%. They reported that extruded sorghum-wheat dough had the highest heating rates (10.75 °C/min) and non-extruded sorghum-wheat dough comprising 0.5% xanthan gum produced the lowest (7.33 °C/min) heating rates [86].
Quinoa is also a widely studied cereal crop in the production of pastry products. Bilgicli (2013) reported that the addition of pseudo-cereals, e.g., quinoa at 25% of a recipe in gluten-free noodles can enhance nutrient content, for instance, proteins and minerals (calcium, magnesium, zinc, and iron) [87]. Giménez et al. (2016) reported that the substitution of maize flour with quinoa flour in the production of pasta-like products showed an additive effect, remarkably enhancing the dietary fibre contents, unsaturated fatty acids, iron, and zinc [31]. Schoenlechner et al. (2010) reported that the inclusion of quinoa flour improved the cooking losses of gluten-free pasta [88]. Tiga et al. (2021) reported that the addition of quinoa flour improved the water absorption, hardness, and redness (*) values and reduced the cohesiveness and luminosity (L*) values of instant noodles produced [23]. Alvarez-Jubete et al. (2009) reported a significant increase in the bread volumes of buckwheat and quinoa bread in contrast with the control (rice flour and potato starch). Moreover, the pseudo-cereal-containing breads were characterized by a significantly softer crumb texture that was due to the presence of natural emulsifiers in the pseudo-cereal flours [18]. Cárdenas-Hernández et al. (2016) reported that pasta with amaranth ingredients had reduced cooking time, improved cooking loss percentage, reduced luminosity values and increased nutrient content when contrasted with semolina control pasta [89].
Another cereal crop which has been used in the production of pastry products is millet. Chaitra et al. (2020) produced Belgian waffles with wheat flour substituted with finger millet and pearl millet flours and reported that the control sample (100% wheat flour) had a harder texture with a shear force of 35.86 N compared with the blended samples with a shear force ranging from 19.68 N to 27.02 N. The result of the sensory analysis proved that the samples containing millet flour were more accepted, up to 50% [90]. Ibidapo et al. (2020) reported a significant increase in the nutritional properties (dietary fibre, calcium, phosphorus and sodium) of bread produced from wheat flour (65.18%) mixed with malted millet flour (19.43%) and okra flour (15.39%) [91]. Torbica et al. (2019) also reported that wheat flour substituted at 60% with barley flour led to an increase in insoluble fibre, soluble fibre, total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity by 700%, 200%, 41.5 and 45%, respectively. They concluded that the inclusion of sesame seeds can increase the acceptability of barley-enriched bread by consumers in addition to the inherent health benefits [92]. Al-Attabi et al. (2017) reported a corresponding decrease in protein and gluten contents when barley was added to wheat flour to produce bread while the ash content and enzyme activity increased [93].
Lin et al. (2012) produced bread from wheat flour partially substituted with micro-fluidized corn bran at 18, 20, and 22% of flour. They reported that for the three kinds of bran substitution when the moisture content was improved from its standard values of 38.3, 38.6, 38.8% to 40.8, 41.9, and 44.0%, correspondingly, the loaves obtained showed comparable microstructure, specific loaf volume, and textural characteristics as the unblended bread [94]. Jeong et al. (2017) produced dough with rice flour substituted with rice flour-zein in a hydrated viscoelastic state at 5 and 10% by weight to account for the functionality of wheat gluten in the gluten-free sheeted dough. There was an increase in the mixing stability and development time of the rice dough with progressive amounts of zein substitution [95]. Storck et al. (2013) reported that protein-fortified, gluten-free baked foods with enhanced crumb texture and improved specific volume could be achieved with the addition of transglutaminase (1.35 U/g of protein), albumin (0.67/100 g) and casein (0.67/100 g) [96].
Renoldi et al. (2021) reported that pasta produced from psyllium seed husk was firmer and sticker than 100% durum wheat semolina. The cooking loss was reported to have increased with increasing levels of psyllium seed husk substitution above 25 g/kg with values below the technologically acceptable limit of 80 g/kg. Replacement of semolina with 50–100 g/kg psyllium seed husk was potent in reducing the predictive glycemic response of supplemented pasta in comparison with the unfortified sample and this was attributed to the formation of fibre aggregates limiting starch swelling after the scanning electron microscopy and dough rheology [97].

2.3. Use of Root and Tuber Crops in Bread Making and Other Pastry Products

Roots and tuber crops are an essential component of the human diet as they are the main source of energy in the form of carbohydrates for the body. There are enormous kinds of roots and tuber crops produced globally. Nevertheless, their extensive utilization in the food industry is limited to only a small number of common types such as potato, cassava, sweet potato, yams and taro [98][99]. Orange-fleshed sweet potato is a biofortified variety of sweet potato that is high in β-carotene, a precursor of vitamin A and other health-promoting bioactive compounds like flavonoids, dietary fibre, vitamins and polyphenols [8][100][101]. Chikpah et al. (2021) reported that partial replacement of wheat flour at 29.4 or 28.0% of peeled or unpeeled, orange-fleshed sweet potato flour, respectively and baking temperature of 180 °C for 15 min produced the best quality dough and bread quality features [8]. Cui & Zhu (2022) reported the addition of purple-fleshed potato can result in Chinese steamed bread with improved nutritional quality and phenolic profiles [24].
Idowu et al. (1996) reported a reduction in oven springs and specific volumes when cocoyam flour was blended with wheat flour to produce bread [21]. Chisenga et al. (2020) reported that wheat can be substituted with cassava flour up to 10% in bread making without negatively impacting the overall bread quality [102]. Jensen et al. (2015) reported that depending on the type of cassava flour, wheat flour can be replaced with cassava flour up to 30% with the addition of psyllium husk (7%) without any significant differences from 100% wheat flour bread [22]. Shittu et al. (2009) reported that the inclusion of xanthan gum to a cassava-wheat flour blend had substantial effects on the dough firmness and extensibility and sensory satisfactoriness of bread and the storage stability of bread [103].
Nyembwe et al. (2018) also reported that the defatted Marama flour mixed with cassava flour at a ratio of 33:67 can yield a dough of similar strength, but with reduced stability compared with wheat flour dough [104]. Nindjin et al. (2011) reported that white wheat flour replacement with yam starch up to 30% or cassava starch up to 20% led to kinetics expansions of resulting doughs comparable with the unblended sample. The results of the sensory analysis suggested that 30% yam starch replacement and 20% cassava starch resulted in bread that met consumer satisfaction on all the quality characteristics of the unblended sample [105].

References

  1. Campbell, G.M.; Fang, C.; Muhamad, I.I. On predicting roller milling performance VI: Effect of kernel hardness and shape on the particle size distribution from first break milling of wheat. Food Bioprod. Process. 2007, 85, 7–23.
  2. Lephuthing, M.C.; Tolmay, V.L.; Baloyi, T.A.; Hlongoane, T.; Oliphant, T.A.; Tsilo, T.J. Relationship of grain micronutrient concentrations and grain yield components in a doubled haploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) population. Crop Pasture Sci. 2022, 73, 116–126.
  3. Campbell, G.M.; Scanlon, M.G.; Pyle, D.L. Bubbles in Food 2: Novelty, Health and Luxury; Eagan Press: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2008; pp. 1–22.
  4. Day, L.; Augustin, M.A.; Batey, I.L.; Wrigley, C.W. Wheat-gluten uses and industry needs. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2006, 17, 82–90.
  5. Koehler, P.; Wieser, H. Chemistry of cereal grains. In Handbook on Sourdough Biotechnology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 11–45.
  6. Hoseney, R.C.; Rogers, D.E. The formation and properties of wheat flour doughs. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1990, 29, 73–93.
  7. Espinosa-Ramírez, J.; Garzon, R.; Serna-Saldivar, S.O.; Rosell, C.M. Functional and nutritional replacement of gluten in gluten-free yeast-leavened breads by using β-conglycinin concentrate extracted from soybean flour. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 84, 353–360.
  8. Chikpah, S.K.; Korese, J.K.; Hensel, O.; Sturm, B.; Pawelzik, E. Rheological properties of dough and bread quality characteristics as influenced by the proportion of wheat flour substitution with orange-fleshed sweet potato flour and baking conditions. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 147, 111515.
  9. Wieser, H.; Koehler, P. The biochemical basis of celiac disease. Cereal Chem. 2008, 85, 1–13.
  10. Rossi, S.; Capobianco, F.; Sabatino, G.; Maurano, F.; Luongo, D.; Rossi, M. Pilot scale production of a non-immunogenic soluble gluten by wheat flour transamidation with applications in food processing for celiac-susceptible people. J. Cereal Sci. 2020, 96, 103117.
  11. Noorfarahzilah, M.; Lee, J.S.; Sharifudin, M.S.; Mohd-Fadzelly, A.B.; Hasmadi, M.; Fadzelly, M.A.; Hasmadi, M. Applications of composite flour in development of food products. Int. Food Res. J. 2014, 21, 2061.
  12. Marco, C.; Rosell, C.M. Breadmaking performance of protein enriched, gluten-free breads. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2008, 227, 1205–1213.
  13. Fenn, D.; Lukow, O.M.; Humphreys, G.; Fields, P.G.; Boye, J.I. Wheat-legume composite flour quality. Int. J. Food Prop. 2010, 13, 381–393.
  14. Zucco, F.; Borsuk, Y.; Arntfield, S.D. Physical and nutritional evaluation of wheat cookies supplemented with pulse flours of different particle sizes. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 2070–2076.
  15. Giménez, M.A.; Drago, S.R.; De Greef, D.; Gonzalez, R.J.; Lobo, M.O.; Samman, N.C. Rheological, functional and nutritional properties of wheat/broad bean (Vicia Faba) flour blends for pasta formulation. Food Chem. 2012, 134, 200–206.
  16. Bolarinwa, I.F.; Oyesiji, O.O. Gluten free rice-soy pasta: Proximate composition, textural properties and sensory attributes. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06052.
  17. Inglett, G.E.; Peterson, S.C.; Carriere, C.J.; Maneepun, S. Rheological, textural, and sensory properties of Asian noodles containing an oat cereal hydrocolloid. Food Chem. 2005, 90, 1–8.
  18. Alvarez-Jubete, L.; Auty, M.; Arendt, E.K.; Gallagher, E. Baking properties and microstructure of pseudocereal flours in gluten-free bread formulations. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2009, 230, 437–445.
  19. Hussein, A.M.; Kamil, M.M.; Hegazy, N.A.; Abo El-Nor, S.A. Effect of wheat flour supplemented with barely and/or corn flour on balady bread quality. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2013, 63, 11–18.
  20. Torbica, A.; Belović, M.; Tomić, J. Novel breads of non-wheat flours. Food Chem. 2019, 282, 134–140.
  21. Idowu, M.A.; Oni, A.; Amusa, B.M. Bread and biscuit making potential of some Nigerian cocoyam cultivars. Niger. Food J. 1996, 14, 1–12.
  22. Jensen, S.; Skibsted, L.H.; Kidmose, U.; Thybo, A.K. Addition of cassava flours in bread-making: Sensory and textural evaluation. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 60, 292–299.
  23. Tiga, B.H.; Kumcuoglu, S.; Vatansever, M.; Tavman, S. Thermal and pasting properties of quinoa—Wheat flour blends and their effects on production of extruded instant noodles. J. Cereal Sci. 2021, 97, 103120.
  24. Cui, R.; Zhu, F. Changes in structure and phenolic profiles during processing of steamed bread enriched with purple sweet potato flour. Food Chem. 2022, 369, 130578.
  25. Mohammed, I.; Ahmed, A.R.; Senge, B. Dough rheology and bread quality of wheat–chickpea flour blends. Ind. Crops Prod. 2012, 36, 196–202.
  26. Boukid, F.; Zannini, E.; Carini, E.; Vittadini, E. Pulses for bread fortification: A necessity or a choice? Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 88, 416–428.
  27. Azman Halimi, R.; Barkla, B.J.; Mayes, S.; King, G.J. The Potential of the underutilized pulse Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea) for nutritional food security. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2019, 77, 47–59.
  28. Semba, R.D.; Ramsing, R.; Rahman, N.; Kraemer, K.; Bloem, M.W. Legumes as a sustainable source of protein in human diets. Glob. Food Secur. 2021, 28, 100520.
  29. Rawal, V.; Charrondiere, R.; Xipsiti, M.; Grande, F. Pulses: Nutritional benefits and consumption patterns. In The Global Economy of Pulses; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2019; pp. 9–19.
  30. Benayad, A.; Taghouti, M.; Benali, A.; Aboussaleh, Y.; Benbrahim, N. Nutritional and technological assessment of durum wheat-faba bean enriched flours, and sensory quality of developed composite bread. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 635–642.
  31. Giménez, M.A.; Drago, S.R.; Bassett, M.N.; Lobo, M.O.; Sammán, N.C. Nutritional improvement of corn pasta-like product with broad bean (Vicia faba) and quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa). Food Chem. 2016, 199, 150–156.
  32. Tazrart, K.; Lamacchia, C.; Zaidi, F.; Haros, M. Nutrient composition and in vitro digestibility of fresh pasta enriched with Vicia faba. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2016, 47, 8–15.
  33. Olapade, A.A.; Oluwole, O.B. Bread making potential of composite flour of wheat-acha (Digitaria exilis) enriched with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) flour. Niger. Food J. 2013, 31, 6–12.
  34. Nur Herken, E.; İbanog’lu, Ş.; Öner, M.D.; İbanog’lu, E. The in vitro protein digestibility, microbiological quality and gelatinization behaviour of macaroni as affected by cowpea flour addition. Food Chem. 2006, 98, 664–669.
  35. Doxastakis, G.; Zafiriadis, I.; Irakli, M.; Marlani, H.; Tananaki, C. Lupin, Soya and Triticale addition to wheat flour doughs and their effect on rheological properties. Food Chem. 2002, 77, 219–227.
  36. Rani, S.; Singh, R.; Kamble, D.B.; Upadhyay, A.; Kaur, B.P. Structural and quality evaluation of soy enriched functional noodles. Food Biosci. 2019, 32, 100465.
  37. Chinma, C.E.; Anuonye, J.C.; Ocheme, O.B.; Abdullahi, S.; Oni, S.; Yakubu, C.M.; Azeez, S.O. Effect of Acha and Bambara nut sourdough flour addition on the quality of bread. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 70, 223–228.
  38. Oyeyinka, S.A.; Adepegba, A.A.; Oyetunde, T.T.; Oyeyinka, A.T.; Olaniran, A.F.; Iranloye, Y.M.; Olagunju, O.F.; Manley, M.; Kayitesi, E.; Njobeh, P.B. Chemical, antioxidant and sensory properties of pasta from fractionated whole wheat and Bambara groundnut flour. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 138, 110618.
  39. Bigne, F.; Puppo, M.C.; Ferrero, C. Mesquite (Prosopis alba) flour as a novel ingredient for obtaining a “panettone-like” bread. applicability of part-baking technology. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 89, 666–673.
  40. Perri, G.; Coda, R.; Rizzello, C.G.; Celano, G.; Ampollini, M.; Gobbetti, M.; De Angelis, M.; Calasso, M. Sourdough fermentation of whole and sprouted lentil flours: In situ formation of dextran and effects on the nutritional, texture and sensory characteristics of white bread. Food Chem. 2021, 355, 129638.
  41. De la Hera, E.; Ruiz-París, E.; Oliete, B.; Gómez, M. Studies of the quality of cakes made with wheat-lentil composite flours. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 49, 48–54.
  42. Zhao, J.; Liu, X.; Bai, X.; Wang, F. Production of biscuits by substitution with different ratios of yellow pea flour. Grain Oil Sci. Technol. 2019, 2, 91–96.
  43. Xing, Q.; Kyriakopoulou, K.; Zhang, L.; Boom, R.M.; Schutyser, M.A. Protein fortification of wheat bread using dry fractionated chickpea protein-enriched fraction or its sourdough. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 142, 110931.
  44. Gómez, M.; Oliete, B.; Rosell, C.M.; Pando, V.; Fernández, E. Studies on cake quality made of wheat–chickpea flour blends. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 41, 1701–1709.
  45. Wood, J.A. Texture, processing and organoleptic properties of chickpea-fortified spaghetti with insights to the underlying mechanisms of traditional durum pasta quality. J. Cereal Sci. 2009, 49, 128–133.
  46. Garcia-Valle, D.E.; Bello-Pérez, L.A.; Agama-Acevedo, E.; Alvarez-Ramirez, J. Structural characteristics and in vitro starch digestibility of pasta made with durum wheat semolina and chickpea flour. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 145, 111347.
  47. Jia, F.; Ma, Z.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Liu, L.; Hu, X. Effect of kansui addition on dough rheology and quality characteristics of chickpea-wheat composite flour-based noodles and the underlying mechanism. Food Chem. 2019, 298, 125081.
  48. Gallegos-Infante, J.A.; Rocha-Guzman, N.E.; Gonzalez-Laredo, R.F.; Ochoa-Martínez, L.A.; Corzo, N.; Bello-Perez, L.A.; Medina-Torres, L.; Peralta-Alvarez, L.E. Quality of spaghetti pasta containing Mexican common bean flour (Phaseolus vulgaris). Food Chem. 2010, 119, 1544–1549.
  49. Rafiq, A.; Sharma, S.; Singh, B. In vitro starch digestibility, degree of gelatinization and functional properties of twin screw prepared cereal-legume pasta. J. Cereal Sci. 2017, 74, 279–287.
  50. Mirsaeedghazi, H.; Emam-Djomeh, Z.; Mousavi, S.M. Rheometric measurement of dough rheological characteristics and factors affecting it. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2008, 10, 112–119.
  51. Laverse, J.; Frisullo, P.; Conte, A.; Alessandro, M.; Nobile, D. X-ray microtomography for food for food quality analysis. In Food Industrial Processes—Methods and Equipment; Benjamin, V., Ed.; InTech Publishers: Slavka, Croatia, 2012; pp. 339–362.
  52. Gellynck, X.; Kühne, B.; Van Bockstaele, F.; Van de Walle, D.; Dewettinck, K. Consumer perception of bread quality. Appetite 2009, 53, 16–23.
  53. Scanlon, M.G.; Zghal, M.C. Bread properties and crumb structure. Food Res. Int. 2001, 34, 841–864.
  54. Mondal, A.; Datta, A.K. Bread Baking—A Review. J. Food Eng. 2008, 86, 465–474.
  55. Collar, C.; Jiménez, T.; Conte, P.; Fadda, C. Impact of ancient cereals, pseudocereals and legumes on starch hydrolysis and antiradical activity of technologically viable blended breads. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 113, 149–158.
  56. Duodu, K.G.; Taylor, J.R.N.; Collar, C. The Production and quality of breads made from non-wheat flours. In Breadmaking; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2020; pp. 647–689.
  57. Sabanis, D.; Tzia, C. Effect of rice, corn and soy flour addition on characteristics of bread produced from different wheat cultivars. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2007, 2, 68–79.
  58. Bojňanská, T.; Musilová, J.; Vollmannová, A. Effects of adding legume flours on the rheological and breadmaking properties of dough. Foods 2021, 10, 1087.
  59. Kohajdová, Z.; Karovičová, J.; Magala, M. Effect of lentil and bean flours on rheological and baking properties of wheat dough. Chem. Pap. 2013, 67, 398–407.
  60. Dueñas, M.; Sarmento, T.; Aguilera, Y.; Benitez, V.; Mollá, E.; Esteban, R.M.; Martín-Cabrejas, M.A. Impact of cooking and germination on phenolic composition and dietary fibre fractions in dark beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) and Lentils (Lens culinaris). LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 66, 72–78.
  61. Elkhalifa, A.E.O.; Bernhardt, R. Influence of grain germination on functional properties of sorghum flour. Food Chem. 2010, 121, 387–392.
  62. Millar, K.A.; Barry-Ryan, C.; Burke, R.; McCarthy, S.; Gallagher, E. Dough properties and baking characteristics of white bread, as affected by addition of raw, germinated and toasted pea flour. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2019, 56, 102189.
  63. Paraskevopoulou, A.; Provatidou, E.; Tsotsiou, D.; Kiosseoglou, V. Dough rheology and baking performance of wheat flour–lupin protein isolate blends. Food Res. Int. 2010, 43, 1009–1016.
  64. Kahraman, G.; Harsa, S.; Lucisano, M.; Cappa, C. Physicochemical and rheological properties of rice-based gluten-free blends containing differently treated chickpea flours. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 98, 276–282.
  65. Baiano, A.; Lamacchia, C.; Fares, C.; Terracone, C.; La Notte, E. Cooking behaviour and acceptability of composite pasta made of semolina and toasted or partially defatted soy flour. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 1226–1232.
  66. Li, J.-M.; Nie, S.-P. The functional and nutritional aspects of hydrocolloids in foods. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 53, 46–61.
  67. Jia, F.; Ma, Z.; Hu, X. Controlling dough rheology and structural characteristics of chickpea-wheat composite flour-based noodles with different levels of Artemisia sphaerocephala krasch gum addition. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 150, 605–616.
  68. Wang, Y.; Sorvali, P.; Laitila, A.; Maina, N.H.; Coda, R.; Katina, K. Dextran produced in situ as a tool to improve the quality of wheat-faba bean composite bread. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 84, 396–405.
  69. Huang, L.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, S.; Hu, W.; Dong, M. Impact of tempeh flour on the rheology of wheat flour dough and bread staling. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 111, 694–702.
  70. Qi, G.; Venkateshan, K.; Mo, X.; Zhang, L.; Xiuzhi, S. Physicochemical properties of soy protein: Effects of subunit composition. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 9958–9964.
  71. Nashat, S.; Abdullah, M.Z. Quality evaluation of bakery products. In Computer Vision Technology for Food Quality Evaluation, 2nd ed.; Da-Wen, S., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 525–589.
  72. Giannou, V.; Kessoglou, V.; Tzia, C. Quality and safety characteristics of bread made from frozen dough. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2003, 14, 99–108.
  73. Sablani, S.S.; Baik, O.-D.; Marcotte, M. Neural networks for predicting thermal conductivity of bakery products. J. Food Eng. 2002, 52, 299–304.
  74. Seo, S.; Karboune, S.; Archelas, A. Production and characterization of potato patatin–galactose, galactooligosaccharides, and galactan conjugates of great potential as functional ingredients. Food Chem. 2014, 158, 480–489.
  75. Campbell, L.; Euston, S.R.; Ahmed, M.A. Effect of addition of thermally modified cowpea protein on sensory acceptability and textural properties of wheat bread and sponge cake. Food Chem. 2016, 194, 1230–1237.
  76. Erdogdu-Arnoczky, N.; Czuchajowska, Z.; Pomeranz, Y. Functionality of whey and casein in fermentation and in bread baking by fixed and optimized procedures. Cereal Chem. 1996, 73, 309–316.
  77. Bremner, H.A. Toward practical definitions of quality for food science. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2000, 40, 83–90.
  78. Wujun, M.A.; Zitong, Y.U.; Maoyun, S.H.E.; Shahidul, I. Wheat gluten protein and its impacts on wheat processing quality. Front. Agric. Sci. Eng. 2019, 6, 279–287.
  79. Guerrieri, N. Cereals proteins. In Proteins in Food Processing, 2nd ed.; Yada, R.Y., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2018; pp. 223–244.
  80. Zareef, M.; Arslan, M.; Hassan, M.M.; Ahmad, W.; Ali, S.; Li, H.; Ouyang, Q.; Wu, X.; Hashim, M.M.; Chen, Q. Recent advances in assessing qualitative and quantitative aspects of cereals using nondestructive techniques: A Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 116, 815–828.
  81. Pamella, C.A.; de Morais Cardoso, L.; Jaqueline, V.P.; Gomesa, C.M.; Della, L.C.; Wanderlei, P.C.; Melicia, C.G.; Valéria, A.V.; Rita, C.G.; Hércia, S.D.; et al. Comparing sorghum and wheat whole grain breakfast cereals: Sensorial acceptance and bioactive compound content. Food Chem. 2017, 221, 984–989.
  82. Khating, K.P.; Kenghe, R.N.; Yenge, G.B.; Ingale, V.M.; Shelar, S.D. Effect of blending sorghum flour on dough rheology of wheat bread. Int. J. Agric. Eng. 2014, 7, 117–124.
  83. Hussein, M.A.; Saleh, A.; Noaman, M. Effect of adding sorghum flour on physical and chemical properties of bread. Period. Polytech.-Chem. Eng. 1977, 21, 343–354.
  84. Mtelisi Dube, N.; Xu, F.; Zhao, R. The Efficacy of sorghum flour addition on dough rheological properties and bread quality: A short review. Grain Oil Sci. Technol. 2020, 3, 164–171.
  85. Arendt, E.K.; Zannini, E. Cereal Grains for the Food and Beverage Industries, 1st ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2013; pp. 283–311.
  86. Jafari, M.; Koocheki, A.; Milani, E. Functional effects of xanthan gum on quality attributes and microstructure of extruded sorghum-wheat composite dough and bread. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 89, 551–558.
  87. Bilgicli, N. Some chemical and sensory properties of gluten-free noodle prepared with different legume, pseudocereal and cereal flour blends. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2013, 52, 251–255.
  88. Schoenlechner, R.; Drausinger, J.; Ottenschlaeger, V.; Jurackova, K.; Berghofer, E. Functional properties of gluten-free pasta produced from amaranth, quinoa and buckwheat. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2010, 65, 339–349.
  89. Cárdenas-Hernández, A.; Beta, T.; Loarca-Piña, G.; Castaño-Tostado, E.; Nieto-Barrera, J.O.; Mendoza, S. Improved functional properties of pasta: Enrichment with amaranth seed flour and dried amaranth leaves. J. Cereal Sci. 2016, 72, 84–90.
  90. Chaitra, U.; Abhishek, P.; Sudha, M.L.; Vanitha, T.; Crassina, K. Impact of millets on wheat based Belgian waffles: Quality characteristics and nutritional composition. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 124, 109136.
  91. Ibidapo, O.P.; Henshaw, F.O.; Shittu, T.A.; Afolabi, W.A. Quality evaluation of functional bread developed from wheat, malted millet (Pennisetum glaucum) and ‘Okara’ flour blends. Sci. Afr. 2020, 10, e00622.
  92. Torbica, A.; Mocko Blažek, K.; Belović, M.; Janić Hajnal, E. Quality prediction of bread made from composite flours using different parameters of empirical rheology. J. Cereal Sci. 2019, 89, 102812.
  93. Al-Attabi, Z.H.; Merghani, T.M.; Ali, A.; Rahman, M.S. Effect of barley flour addition on the physico-chemical properties of dough and structure of bread. J. Cereal Sci. 2017, 75, 61–68.
  94. Lin, S.Y.; Chen, H.H.; Lu, S.; Wang, P.C. Effects of blending of wheat flour with barley flour on dough and steamed bread properties. J. Texture Stud. 2012, 43, 438–444.
  95. Jeong, S.; Kim, H.W.; Lee, S. Rheological and secondary structural characterization of rice flour-zein composites for noodles slit from gluten-free sheeted dough. Food Chem. 2017, 221, 1539–1545.
  96. Storck, C.R.; da Rosa Zavareze, E.; Gularte, M.A.; Elias, M.C.; Rosell, C.M.; Guerra Dias, A.R. Protein enrichment and its effects on gluten-free bread characteristics. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 53, 346–354.
  97. Renoldi, N.; Brennan, C.S.; Lagazio, C.; Peressini, D. Evaluation of technological properties, microstructure and predictive glycaemic response of durum wheat pasta enriched with psyllium seed husk. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 151, 112203.
  98. Jayakody, L.; Hoover, R.; Liu, Q.; Donner, E. Studies on tuber starches. ii. molecular structure, composition and physicochemical properties of yam (Dioscorea spp.) starches grown in Sri Lanka. Carbohydr. Polym. 2007, 69, 148–163.
  99. Chiranthika, N.G.; Chandrasekara, A.; Gunathilake, K.D. Physicochemical characterization of flours and starches derived from selected underutilized roots and tuber crops grown in Sri Lanka. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 124, 107272.
  100. Awuni, V.; Alhassan, M.W.; Amagloh, F.K. Orange-fleshed sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) composite bread as a significant source of dietary vitamin A. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 6, 174–179.
  101. Edun, A.A.; Olatunde, G.O.; Shittu, T.A.; Adeogun, A.I. Flour, dough and bread properties of wheat flour substituted with orange-fleshed sweetpotato flour. J. Culin. Sci. Technol. 2019, 17, 268–289.
  102. Chisenga, S.M.; Workneh, T.S.; Bultosa, G.; Alimi, B.A.; Siwela, M. Dough rheology and loaf quality of wheat-cassava bread using different cassava varieties and wheat substitution levels. Food Biosci. 2020, 34, 100529.
  103. Shittu, T.A.; Aminu, R.A.; Abulude, E.O. Functional effects of xanthan gum on composite cassava-wheat dough and bread. Food Hydrocoll. 2009, 23, 2254–2260.
  104. Nyembwe, P.M.; de Kock, H.L.; Taylor, J.R. Potential of defatted marama flour-cassava starch composites to produce functional gluten-free bread-type dough. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 92, 429–434.
  105. Nindjin, C.; Amani, G.N.; Sindic, M. Effect of blend levels on composite wheat doughs performance made from yam and cassava native starches and bread quality. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 86, 1637–1645.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Food Science & Technology
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : Sunday Joy Olakanmi , Digvir S. Jayas , Jitendra Paliwal
View Times: 1.5K
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 07 Nov 2022
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Notice
    You are not a member of the advisory board for this topic. If you want to update advisory board member profile, please contact office@encyclopedia.pub.
    OK
    Confirm
    Only members of the Encyclopedia advisory board for this topic are allowed to note entries. Would you like to become an advisory board member of the Encyclopedia?
    Yes
    No
    Academic Video Service
    Feedback