Your browser does not fully support modern features. Please upgrade for a smoother experience.
Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic. For video creation, please contact our Academic Video Service.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 handwiki Sirius Huang -- 2630 2022-11-03 01:43:32

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Academic Video Service to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
HandWiki. Similarity. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/32739 (accessed on 12 September 2026).
HandWiki. Similarity. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/32739. Accessed September 12, 2026.
HandWiki. "Similarity" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/32739 (accessed September 12, 2026).
HandWiki. (2022, November 03). Similarity. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/32739
HandWiki. "Similarity." Encyclopedia. Web. 03 November, 2022.
Similarity
Edit
The content is sourced from: https://handwiki.org/wiki/Philosophy:Similarity

In philosophy, similarity or resemblance is a relation between objects that constitutes how much these objects are alike. Similarity comes in degrees: e.g. oranges are more similar to apples than to the moon. It is traditionally seen as an internal relation and analyzed in terms of shared properties: two things are similar because they have a property in common. The more properties they share, the more similar they are. They resemble each other exactly if they share all their properties. So an orange is similar to the moon because they both share the property of being round, but it is even more similar to an apple because additionally, they both share various other properties, like the property of being a fruit. On a formal level, similarity is usually considered to be a relation that is reflexive (everything resembles itself), symmetric (if a is similar to b then b is similar to a) and non-transitive (a need not resemble c despite a resembling b and b resembling c). Similarity comes in two forms: respective similarity, which is relative to one respect or feature, and overall similarity, which expresses the degree of resemblance between two objects all things considered. There is no general consensus whether similarity is an objective, mind-independent feature of reality, and, if so, whether it is a fundamental feature or reducible to other features. Resemblance is central to human cognition since it provides the basis for the categorization of entities into kinds and for various other cognitive processes like analogical reasoning. Similarity has played a central role in various philosophical theories, e.g. as a solution to the problem of universals through resemblance nominalism or in the analysis of counterfactuals in terms of similarity between possible worlds.

nominalism counterfactuals human cognition

References

  1. Cowling, Sam (2017). "Resemblance". Philosophy Compass 12 (4): e12401. doi:10.1111/phc3.12401. https://philpapers.org/rec/COWR-5. 
  2. Rodriguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo (2002). "4.3 The objectivity and primitiveness of resemblance". Resemblance Nominalism: A Solution to the Problem of Universals. Oxford University Press. https://philpapers.org/rec/RODRN. 
  3. Holyoak, K.; Morrison, B.. "2. Similarity". The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. Cambridge University Press. https://philpapers.org/rec/HOLCHO. 
  4. Mittelstraß, Jürgen (2005). "ähnlich/Ähnlichkeit". Enzyklopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie. Metzler. https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783476021083. 
  5. Tversky, Amos (1977). "Features of Similarity". Psychological Review 84 (4): 327–352. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327. https://philpapers.org/rec/TVEFOS. 
  6. Blumson, Ben (2018). "Two Conceptions of Similarity". Philosophical Quarterly 68 (270): 21–37. doi:10.1093/pq/pqx021. https://philpapers.org/rec/BLUTCO-3. 
  7. Orilia, Francesco; Paolini Paoletti, Michele (2020). "Properties". Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/properties/. 
  8. Blumson, Ben (2018). "Distance and Dissimilarity". Philosophical Papers 48 (2): 211–239. doi:10.1080/05568641.2018.1463103. https://philpapers.org/rec/BLUDAD. 
  9. Morreau, Michael (2010). "It Simply Does Not Add Up: Trouble with Overall Similarity". Journal of Philosophy 107 (9): 469–490. doi:10.5840/jphil2010107931. https://philpapers.org/rec/MORISD. 
  10. Guigon, Ghislain (2014). "Overall Similarity, Natural Properties, and Paraphrases". Philosophical Studies 167 (2): 387–399. doi:10.1007/s11098-013-0105-y. https://philpapers.org/rec/GUIOSN. 
  11. Audi, Robert. "identity". The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. https://philpapers.org/rec/AUDTCD-2. 
  12. Sandkühler, Hans Jörg (2010). "Ontologie: 4 Aktuelle Debatten und Gesamtentwürfe". Enzyklopädie Philosophie. Meiner. https://meiner.de/enzyklopadie-philosophie.html. 
  13. Noonan, Harold; Curtis, Ben (2018). "Identity". Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity/. 
  14. Forrest, Peter (2020). "The Identity of Indiscernibles". Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity-indiscernible/. 
  15. Black, Max (1952). "The Identity of Indiscernibles". Mind 61 (242): 153–164. doi:10.1093/mind/LXI.242.153. https://philpapers.org/rec/BLATIO-5. 
  16. Cowling, Sam (2015). "Non-Qualitative Properties". Erkenntnis 80 (2): 275–301. doi:10.1007/s10670-014-9626-9. https://philpapers.org/rec/COWNP. 
  17. Borchert, Donald (2006). "Ontology". Macmillan Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd Edition. Macmillan. https://philpapers.org/rec/MONMEO-3. 
  18. MacLeod, Mary C.. "Universals". https://iep.utm.edu/universa/. 
  19. Rodriguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo (2002). "4.2 Properties and relations as classes". Resemblance Nominalism: A Solution to the Problem of Universals. Oxford University Press. https://philpapers.org/rec/RODRN. 
  20. Rodriguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo (2002). "5.1 The coextension difficulty". Resemblance Nominalism: A Solution to the Problem of Universals. Oxford University Press. https://philpapers.org/rec/RODRN. 
  21. Weatherson, Brian (2016). "David Lewis". Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/david-lewis/. 
  22. Starr, William (2019). "Counterfactuals". Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/counterfactuals/. 
  23. Borchert, Donald (2006). "Counterfactuals in science". Macmillan Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd Edition. Macmillan. https://philpapers.org/rec/BORMEO. 
  24. Craig, Edward (1996). "Counterfactual conditionals". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge. https://philpapers.org/rec/BEAREO. 
  25. Craig, Edward (1996). "Depiction". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge. https://philpapers.org/rec/BEAREO. 
  26. Hyman, John; Bantinaki, Katerina (2017). "Depiction". Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/depiction/. 
  27. Blumson, Ben (2009). "Images, Intentionality and Inexistence". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (3): 522–538. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2009.00292.x. https://philpapers.org/rec/BLUIIA. 
  28. Bartha, Paul (2019). "Analogy and Analogical Reasoning". Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reasoning-analogy/. 
  29. Bunnin, Nicholas; Yu, Jiyuan (2009). "analogy" (in en). The Blackwell Dictionary of Western Philosophy. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-99721-5. https://books.google.com/books?id=OskKWI1YA7AC. 
  30. Sandkühler, Hans Jörg (2010). "Analogie". Enzyklopädie Philosophie. Meiner. https://meiner.de/enzyklopadie-philosophie.html. 
  31. Salmon, Merrilee (2012). "Arguments from analogy". Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking. Cengage Learning. pp. 132–142. ISBN 1-133-71164-2. https://books.google.com/books?id=vd8JAAAAQBAJ. 
  32. Koons, Robert (2017). "Defeasible Reasoning". Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reasoning-defeasible. 
  33. "Argument from design" (in en). https://www.britannica.com/topic/argument-from-design. 
  34. "Problem of other minds" (in en). https://www.britannica.com/topic/problem-of-other-minds. 
  35. Thornton, Stephen P.. "Solipsism and the Problem of Other Minds: 3. The Argument from Analogy". https://iep.utm.edu/solipsis/. 
  36. Biletzki, Anat; Matar, Anat (2020). "Ludwig Wittgenstein". Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/wittgenstein/. 
  37. Honderich, Ted (2005). "family resemblance". The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford University Press. https://philpapers.org/rec/HONTOC-2. 
  38. Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1958). "§66". Philosophical Investigations. Basil Blackwell. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/54889e73e4b0a2c1f9891289/t/564b61a4e4b04eca59c4d232/1447780772744/Ludwig.Wittgenstein.-.Philosophical.Investigations.pdf. 
  39. Lipka, L. (1987). "Prototype Semantics or Feature Semantics - an alternative?". Perspectives on Language in Performance. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/12165957.pdf. 
  40. Earl, Dennis. "The Classical Theory of Concepts: 2d. The Classical Theory of Concepts". https://iep.utm.edu/conc-cl/. 
More
©Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons-Attribution ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Philosophy
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
HandWiki
View Times: 2.0K
Entry Collection: HandWiki
Revision: 1 time (View History)
Update Date: 03 Nov 2022
Table of Contents
    Notice
    You are not a member of the advisory board for this topic. If you want to update advisory board member profile, please contact office@encyclopedia.pub.
    OK
    Confirm
    Only members of the Encyclopedia advisory board for this topic are allowed to note entries. Would you like to become an advisory board member of the Encyclopedia?
    Yes
    No
    ${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
    Submit
    Cancel
    There is no comment~
    ${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
    Submit
    Cancel
    ${ selectedItem.replyTextCharacter }/${ selectedItem.replyMaxCharacter }
    Submit
    Cancel
    Confirm
    Are you sure to Delete?
    Yes No
    Academic Video Service
    Feedback