Your browser does not fully support modern features. Please upgrade for a smoother experience.
Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic. For video creation, please contact our Academic Video Service.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 handwiki Vivi Li -- 2110 2022-11-03 01:35:42

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Academic Video Service to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
HandWiki. Anno Mundi. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/32624 (accessed on 13 September 2026).
HandWiki. Anno Mundi. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/32624. Accessed September 13, 2026.
HandWiki. "Anno Mundi" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/32624 (accessed September 13, 2026).
HandWiki. (2022, November 03). Anno Mundi. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/32624
HandWiki. "Anno Mundi." Encyclopedia. Web. 03 November, 2022.
Anno Mundi
Edit

Anno Mundi (Latin for "in the year of the world"; Hebrew: לבריאת העולם, "to the creation of the world"), abbreviated as AM, or Year After Creation, is a calendar era based on the biblical accounts of the creation of the world and subsequent history. Two such calendar eras have seen notable use historically: While differences in biblical interpretation or in calculation methodology can produce some differences in the creation date, most results fall relatively close to one of these two dominant models. The primary reason for the disparity seems to lie in which underlying Biblical text is chosen (roughly 5500 BC based on the Greek Septuagint text, about 3750 BC based on the Hebrew Masoretic text). Most of the 1,732-year difference resides in numerical discrepancies in the genealogies of the two versions of the Book of Genesis. Patriarchs from Adam to Terah, the father of Abraham, are said to be older by as much as 100 years or more when they begat their named son in the Greek Septuagint than they were in the Latin Vulgate (Genesis 5; Genesis 11) or the Hebrew Tanakh (Gen 5; Gen 11). The net difference between the two major genealogies of Genesis is 1466 years (ignoring the "second year after the flood" ambiguity), 85% of the total difference. (See Dating creation.)

vulgate העולם biblical interpretation

References

  1. Chronology of the Old Testament, Dr. Floyd Nolen Jones "When the center of Jewish life moved from Babylonia to Europe during the 8th and 9th centuries AD, calculations from the Seleucid era became meaningless. Over those centuries, it was replaced by that of the anno mundi era of the Seder Olam. From the 11th century, anno mundi dating became dominant throughout most of the world's Jewish communities." https://books.google.com/books?id=AvVPlyYjX7YC&pg=PA295
  2. Atenebris Adsole. "Avodah Zarah, tractate 10". Halakhah.com. http://www.halakhah.com/zarah/zarah_10.html. Retrieved 2013-08-24. 
  3. Avodah Zarah, tractate 9 Footnote: "The Eras in use among Jews in Talmudic Times are: (a) ERA OF CONTRACTS [H] dating from the year 380 before the Destruction of the Second Temple (312–1 BC) when, at the Battle of Gaza, Seleucus Nicator, one of the followers of Alexander the Great, gained dominion over Palestine. It is also termed Seleucid or Greek Era [H]. Its designation as Alexandrian Era connecting it with Alexander the Great (Maim. Yad, Gerushin 1, 27) is an anachronism, since Alexander died in 323 BC — eleven years before this Era began (v. E. Mahler, Handbuch der judischen Chronologie, p. 145). This Era, which is first mentioned in Mac. I, 10, and was used by notaries or scribes for dating all civil contracts, was generally in vogue in eastern countries till the 16th cent, and was employed even in the 19th cent, among the Jews of Yemen, in South Arabia (Eben Saphir, Lyck, 1866, p. 62b). (b) THE ERA OF THE DESTRUCTION (of the Second Temple) [H] the year 1 of which corresponds to 381 of the Seleucid Era, and 69–70 of the Christian Era. This Era was mainly employed by the Rabbis and was in use in Palestine for several centuries, and even in the later Middle Ages documents were dated by it. One of the recently discovered Genizah documents bears the date 13 Tammuz 987 after the Destruction of the Temple — i.e. 917 C.E. — (Op. cit. p. 152, also Marmorstein ZDMG, Vol. VI, p. 640). The difference between the two Eras as far as the tens and units are concerned is thus 20. If therefore a Tanna, say in the year 156 Era of Dest. (225 C.E.), while remembering, naturally, the century, is uncertain about the tens and units, he should ask the notary what year it is according to his — Seleucid — era. He will get the answer 536 (156 + 380), on adding 20 to which he would get 556, the last two figures giving him the year [1] 56 of the Era of Destruction." http://www.halakhah.com/zarah/zarah_9.html
  4. p. 107, Kantor
  5. "Birthday of Adam & Eve (3760 BC)". Jewish History. Chabad-Lubavitch Media Center. http://www.chabad.org/calendar/view/day_cdo/aid/150485/jewish/Adam-Eve.htm. Retrieved 15 February 2013. 
  6. "Creation (3761 BC)". Jewish History. Chabad-Lubavitch Media Center. http://www.chabad.org/calendar/view/day_cdo/aid/156820/jewish/Creation.htm. Retrieved 15 February 2013. 
  7. "To find the corresponding Jewish year for any year on the Gregorian calendar, add 3760 to the Gregorian number, if it is before Rosh Hashanah. After Rosh Hashanah, add 3761. " "The Jewish year". About the Jewish Calendar. Chabad-Lubavitch Media Center. http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/526875/jewish/The-Jewish-Year.htm. Retrieved 15 February 2013. 
  8. See The Remaining Signs of Past Centuries.
  9. The Easter Computus and the Origins of the Christian Era, Alden A. Mosshammer. Books.google.co.uk. https://books.google.com/books?id=0umDqPOf2L8C&pg=PA87. Retrieved 2013-08-24. 
  10. Solomon Gandz, Date of Composition of Maimonides Code, Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research, 17 (1947–1948), pp. 1–7. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3622160
  11. "Calendar — when does it start". http://strangeside.com/calendar-when-does-it-start/. 
  12. Tøndering, Claus (2014). "The Hebrew Calendar". http://www.tondering.dk/claus/cal/hebrew.php. 
  13. Landau, Remy (February 16, 2005). "Is Creation at AM 1 or AM 2?". http://hebrewcalendar.tripod.com/luachmail.html#029. 
  14. Theophilus of Antioch. Theophilus of Antioch to Autolycus. Book III. Chapters XXIV (Adam—Samuel), XXV (Saul—Cyrus), XXVII (Cyrus—M. Aurelius Verus), Chap. XXVIII (Adam—M. Aurelius Verus). http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf02.iv.ii.iii.xxiv.html
  15. Sextus Julius Africanus. Extant Writings III. The Extant Fragments of the Five Books of the Chronography of Julius Africanus. Chapters III—VII, XI—XII, XIII, XIV—XV, XVI, XVII, XVIII. http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf06/Page_131.html
  16. Fr. Seraphim Rose. Genesis, Creation and Early Man: The Orthodox Christian Vision. St. Herman of Alaska Brotherhood, Platina, California, 2000. ISBN:978-1-887904-02-5. p. 236.
  17. Eratosthenes of Cyrene (275–194 BC) represented contemporary Alexandrian scholarship; Eupolemus, a Palestinian Jew and a friend of Judah Maccabee, writing in 158 BC, is said to have been the first historian who synchronized Greek history in accordance with the theory of the Mosaic origin of culture. By the time of the 1st century BC, a world chronicle had synchronized Jewish and Greek history and had gained international circulation: Alexander Polyhistor (flourishing in 85–35 BC); Varro (116–27 BC); Ptolemy priest of Mendes (50 BC), who is cited by Tatian (Oratio ad Graecos, 38); Apion (1st century AD); Thrasyllus (before AD 36); and Thallus (1st century AD) – all cited chronicles which had incorporated the dates of the Noachite flood and the exodus. (Dr. Ben Zion Wacholder. "Biblical Chronology in the Hellenistic World Chronicles". in The Harvard Theological Review, Vol.61, No.3 (July 1968), pp. 451–452.)
  18. Dr. Ben Zion Wacholder. "Biblical Chronology in the Hellenistic World Chronicles". in The Harvard Theological Review, Vol.61, No.3 (Jul., 1968), pp. 451–452.
  19. The Penn Commentary on Piers Plowman by Andrew Galloway page 69 https://books.google.com/books?id=sKsC-txuJIEC&pg=PA69&lpg=PA69&ots=_HcftVewNm&sig=I9_s1OGRsuaE08Xm3sJfs4P-xjg
  20. Fourth Century (see 327 Eusebius of Caesarea). Archived 2009-10-25. http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Pines/7224/Rick/chron4.htm
  21.  Howlett, J.A. (1908). "Biblical Chronology". in Herbermann, Charles. Catholic Encyclopedia. 3. New York: Robert Appleton Company. 
  22. from AM 5194 in the Annals at CELT — University College Cork's Corpus of Electronic Texts project has the full text of the annals online, both in the original Irish and in O'Donovan's translation http://www.ucc.ie/celt/published/T100005A/text025.html
  23. Elias J Bickerman (1980). Chronology of the Ancient World (Aspects of Greek & Roman Life) (2nd sub ed.). Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Univ. Press. p. 73. ISBN 0-8014-1282-X. 
  24. Rev. Philip Schaff (1819–1893), Ed. "Era." Schaff–Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge. New Edition, 13 Vols., 1908–14. Vol. 4, pp. 163. http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc04/Page_163.html
  25. A calendar obtained by extension earlier in time than its invention or implementation is called the proleptic version of the calendar.
  26. Pavel Kuzenkov (Moscow). "How old is the World? The Byzantine era κατα Ρωμαίους and its rivals" () 21st International Congress of Byzantine Studies, London 2006. pp. 2–4. http://www.wra1th.plus.com/byzcong/comms/Kuzenkov_paper.pdf
  27. In the commonly used 19‐year Easter moon cycle, there was no year when the Passover (the first spring full moon, Nisan 14) would coincide with Friday and the traditional date of the Passion, 25 March; according to Alexandrian system the date would have to have been Anno Mundi 5533 = 42(!)AD.
  28. George Synkellos. The Chronography of George Synkellos: a Byzantine Chronicle of Universal History from the Creation. Transl. Prof. Dr. William Adler & Paul Tuffin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
  29. Van der Essen, L. "Chronicon Paschale". In The Catholic Encyclopedia (New Advent). New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1908. http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03730b.htm
  30. Landes, Richard (1995). Relics, Apocalypse, and the Deceits of History. Cambridge: Harvard UP. p. 291. 
  31. Wallis, Faith (1999). Bede: The Reckoning of Time. Liverpool: Liverpool UP. pp. 3–4; 157–237; 239; 358. ISBN 0-85323-693-3. 
  32. Duncan, Edwin (1999). Fears of the Apocalypse: The Anglo-Saxons and the Coming of the First Millennium. 31. 15–23; 23 n.6. 
  33. Wallis, Faith (1999). Bede: The Reckoning of Time. Liverpool: Liverpool UP. pp. 407–412. ISBN 0-85323-693-3. 
More
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: History
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
View Times: 7.9K
Entry Collection: HandWiki
Revision: 1 time (View History)
Update Date: 03 Nov 2022
Notice
You are not a member of the advisory board for this topic. If you want to update advisory board member profile, please contact office@encyclopedia.pub.
OK
Confirm
Only members of the Encyclopedia advisory board for this topic are allowed to note entries. Would you like to become an advisory board member of the Encyclopedia?
Yes
No
${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
There is no comment~
${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
${ selectedItem.replyTextCharacter }/${ selectedItem.replyMaxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
Confirm
Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Academic Video Service