Starch is one of the most abundant natural polymers globally. Starch and its nanocomposites have been extensively studied for their abundance, low cost, ease of processibility, and chemical and physical properties.
In recent days, nanocomposites have gained much attention over traditional composite materials and are widely used in food, packaging, biomedical applications, electronics, energy storage, optics, the automotive industry, bio-sorbants for environmental remediation, textiles, and many other applications 
. Polymer nanocomposites consist of polymer matrices embedded with nanofillers 
. Petroleum-based polymers are produced in huge amounts globally. Petroleum-based polymers are non-biodegradable, non-renewable, and produce hazardous substances which can threaten human health and the environment 
. Furthermore, the depletion of these non-renewable petroleum-based fuels demands alternative resources 
Thus, biopolymer-based nanocomposites can be a sustainable alternative for petroleum-based nanocomposites in many applications due to their biodegradability, eco-friendliness, renewability, relatively inexpensive, low toxicity, abundancy, and improved thermal, mechanical, physical, barrier, and functional properties 
. Various natural biopolymers, including starch, cellulose, pectin, lignin, chitin/chitosan, alginates, hyaluronic acid, gelatin, terpenes, gelatin, gluten, and polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) from plants, animals, algae, microorganisms and synthetic biopolymers, including polycaprolactone (PCL), poly(butylene succinate) (PBS), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acids) (PLGA), and polylactic acids (PLA), have been used in nanocomposite materials for various applications 
Starch is one of the most abundant natural polymers globally. Starch and its nanocomposites have been extensively studied for their abundance, low cost, ease of processibility, and chemical and physical properties 
. Furthermore, starch can be used in natural or modified form. Native starch has drawbacks, such as poor mechanical properties, high hydrophilicity, and high biodegradability. Thus, researchers are exploring starch modification techniques to improve its properties and develop novel composites 
Starch can be modified into nanoparticles and can also undergo various physical (milling, blending with other polymers, extrusion, plasticizers, etc.) and chemical (substitution, graft co-polymerization, cross-linking, oxidation, etherification, esterification, dual modification, etc.) modifications to produce materials with novel properties 
Starch can be reinforced with starch nanoparticle/starch nanocrystals and nano polymers such as nanoclay (montmorillonites [MMTs], halloysites nanotubes [HNTs]), carbon nanotubes (CNTs), and nanofibers and nanowhiskers (cellulose, chitin) and metal and metal oxides (TiO2
NPs, ZnO NPs, etc.) to achieve desirable properties and produce potential green sustainable nanocomposite materials 
. The addition of nanofillers and additives with antioxidant and antimicrobial properties has been shown to improve or minimally affect biodegradation of starch-based nanocomposites 
. Lifecycle assessments on starch and starch-based composites ensure their lower environmental impact and sustainable alternative for petrochemical-based polymers 
Starch is a polysaccharide and is renewable, inexpensive, biodegradable, and readily available. Starch contains two polymers (glucans) known as amylose (10–30%) and amylopectin (70–90%). Amylose is a linear chain of D-glucose units linked by the α-(1,4) glycosylic bonds, while amylopectin is a highly branched and high molecular weight chain composed of D-glucose repeating units linked by α-(1,4) glycosylic bonds and α-(1,6) glycosidic bonds. The amylopectin chain contains 10–60 glucose units, and the side chains consist of 15–45 glucose units with about 5% of α-(1,6) branching points 
. Amylose and amylopectin are radially arranged in an alternating concentric (amorphous and semi-crystalline) ring in starch granules. Amylopectin is radially arranged in granules and contributes to its crystalline nature (double helices region), and single helices amylose is randomly distributed among amylopectin clusters. Amylose and the branching point of amylopectin form the amorphous region 
. Figure 1
illustrates the structure of the starch granule and the chemical structure of amylopectin and amylose.
Figure 1. Starch granule structure and the chemical structure of amylopectin and amylose.
Starch is a primary energy source in plants, which is stored in various parts, including the roots, tubers, seeds, and stems 
. Various plant sources, such as corn, potato, wheat, cassava, rice, corn, barley, rye, millet, peas, mung beans, lentils, arrowroot, sago, sorghum, banana, yam, and many others, are utilized to obtain starch 
Starches from different sources show variation in their chemical composition (α-glucans, moisture, lipids, proteins, and phosphorylated residues), the structure of glucan components (amylose and amylose), and starch granule size and shape due to genetic and environmental factors 
Starch granules’ size and shape can vary with the content, structure, and arrangement of amylose and amylopectin 
. Starch granules are found in various sizes ranging from 2–150 µm and packed with amylose and amylopectin content. Regular starch granules contain amylose in the range of 15–30% but can be varied in the range of 0–78%. Waxy starch contains lower or no amylose, whereas high-amylose starch consists of more than 50% amylose 
. Table 1
shows the amylose contents of various starch sources.
Table 1. Amylose and amylopectin contents of starch from various sources.
Starch-based hydrogel is formed via gelatinization of starch during heating with excess water and followed by three-dimensional network formation by retrogradation 
. Gelatinization of starch is an irreversible process that occurs through the absorption of water and disruption of the crystalline structure of starch granules by hydrogen bond breakage, swelling, the disintegration of starch granules, leaching of amylose that increases viscosity and solubilization of starch molecules 
Amylose and amylopectin content, amylopectin structure (molar mass or chain length), and starch granule size influence the chemical, physical, optical/transparency, and functional properties (water uptake, swelling, gelatinization, pasting [pasting viscosity and temperature], retrogradation, and susceptibility to enzymatic hydrolysis of starch 
Amylopectin contributes to water absorption, swelling, and pasting of starch granules, whereas amylose hinders the swelling property in the presence of lipids, thus preventing gelatinization power 
. Furthermore, short-chain amylopectin showed better swelling power than that of long-chain amylopectin, indicating that starch with higher crystallinity reduces the swelling power 
. Smaller granule size increases hydration, thus increasing the swelling, viscosity, and gelatinization properties 
Amylose content is negatively correlated with swelling power, gelatinization temperature, and the enthalpy of gelatinization required to disrupt the crystalline structure 
. Waxy starch has a higher degree of crystallinity and higher gelatinization temperature than starch with high amylose content 
. Amylose in starch has a high tendency for retrogradation due to its linear structure. However, the retrogradation properties of starch are mainly determined by the degree of crystallinity and gelatinization temperature than the amylose content 
Amylose–amylopectin ratio also influences thermal, mechanical, and barrier properties. Basiak et al. 
reported that potato starch, containing lower amylose (20%) than that of wheat (25%) and corn (27%) starch, exhibited greater mechanical properties and lower water solubility, water vapor, and oxygen permeability. Other than that, optical properties were influenced by the amylose/amylopectin ratio: the potato (lower amylose) film was transparent, whereas corn and wheat films were opalescent.
However, applications of starch have been limited due to their poor performance, such as through their brittleness, high water sensitivity, poor gas and moisture barrier, susceptibility to retrogradation, high viscosity, and limited solubility 
. Therefore, plasticizers, chemical modifiers, and incorporating nanofillers, such as starch nanoparticles, nanoparticles, nanoclay, nanofibers, and others, have been used to improve the properties of starch