Your browser does not fully support modern features. Please upgrade for a smoother experience.
Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic. For video creation, please contact our Academic Video Service.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 handwiki Rita Xu -- 3626 2022-10-20 01:31:26

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Academic Video Service to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
HandWiki. Testing Effect. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/30476 (accessed on 23 September 2026).
HandWiki. Testing Effect. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/30476. Accessed September 23, 2026.
HandWiki. "Testing Effect" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/30476 (accessed September 23, 2026).
HandWiki. (2022, October 20). Testing Effect. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/30476
HandWiki. "Testing Effect." Encyclopedia. Web. 20 October, 2022.
Testing Effect
Edit

The testing effect is the finding that long-term memory is often increased when some of the learning period is devoted to retrieving the to-be-remembered information. The effect is also sometimes referred to as retrieval practice, practice testing, or test-enhanced learning. Retrieval practice may be the best way to refer to the testing effect because the benefits of retrieval-related testing are not limited to tests. It can be more broad, including tools like flash cards and quizzes. The testing effect on memory should be distinguished from more general practice effects, defined in the APA Dictionary of Psychology (2007) as "any change or improvement that results from practice or repetition of task items or activities." The term testing effect is also sometimes used in a more general sense; The Oxford Dictionary of Psychology (2003) defines a testing effect as "any effect of taking tests on the respondents, a typical example being test sophistication." Whereas psychologists who develop tests for personality and intelligence want to avoid practice effects, cognitive psychologists working with educators have begun to understand how to take advantage of tests—not as an assessment tool, but as a teaching/learning tool. It is useful for people to test their knowledge of the to-be-remembered material during the learning process, instead of only reading or otherwise passively studying the material. For example, a student can use flashcards to self-test and receive feedback as they study. The testing effect provides a larger benefit to long-term memory when the tested material is difficult enough to require effort, the rate of retrieval success is high, and feedback with correct answers is given after testing. The testing effect is activated by active recall.

long-term memory self-test knowledge

References

  1. Bacon, Francis (2000). Jardine. ed. The New Organon. [Place of publication not identified]: CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY. pp. 143. ISBN 0 511 01154 7. 
  2. James, William (1890). The Principles of Psychology Vol 1,. New York: Holt. pp. Chapter 16 pg 686. 
  3. Mace, C. A. (1932). The Psychology of Study. New York: R.M. McBride & Co.. p. 39. 
  4. Roediger, Henry L.; Karpicke, Jeffrey D. (September 2006). "The Power of Testing Memory: Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice" (in en). Perspectives on Psychological Science 1 (3): 181–210. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x. ISSN 1745-6916. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x. 
  5. Abbott, Edwina (1909). "On the analysis of the factors of recall in the learning process". Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 11 (1): 159–177. doi:10.1037/h0093018. https://insights.ovid.com/psychological-monographs-general-applied/pmga/1909/11/010/analysis-factor-recall-learning-process/5/00006828. 
  6. Larsen, Douglas P.; Butler, Andrew C. (2013). Walsh, K.. ed. Test-enhanced learning. 443–452. ISBN 9780199652679. https://books.google.com/books?id=KW2rAAAAQBAJ&q=Test-enhanced+learning&pg=PA443. 
  7. Carrier, M.; Pashler, H. (1992). "The influence of retrieval on retention". Memory & Cognition 20 (6): 632–642. doi:10.3758/bf03202713. PMID 1435266. http://www.pashler.com/Articles/Carrier_Pashler_MemCog1992.pdf. Retrieved 17 August 2015. 
  8. Roediger, H. L.; Karpicke, J. D. (2006). "Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention". Psychological Science 17 (3): 249–255. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x. PMID 16507066. http://psych.wustl.edu/memory/Roddy%20article%20PDF%27s/Roediger%20&%20Karpicke%20(2006)_PsychSci.pdf. Retrieved 17 August 2015. 
  9. Agarwal (2007). "Examining the Testing Effect with Open- and Closed-Book Tests". Applied Cognitive Psychology 22 (7): 861–876. doi:10.1002/acp.1391.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Facp.1391
  10. Roediger, H. L.; Karpicke, J. D. (2006). "Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention". Psychological Science 17 (3): 249–255. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x. PMID 16507066. http://psych.wustl.edu/memory/Roddy%20article%20PDF%27s/Roediger%20&%20Karpicke%20(2006)_PsychSci.pdf. Retrieved 17 August 2015. 
  11. Butler, A.C. (2010). "Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 36 (5): 1118–1133. doi:10.1037/a0019902. PMID 20804289.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2Fa0019902
  12. Mulligan, N. W.; Picklesimer, M (2016). "Attention and the testing effect". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 42 (6): 938–950. doi:10.1037/xlm0000227. PMID 26618913.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2Fxlm0000227
  13. Toppino, T. C.; Cohen, M. S. (2009). "The testing effect and the retention interval: Questions and answers". Experimental Psychology 56 (4): 252–257. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.252. PMID 19439397.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1027%2F1618-3169.56.4.252
  14. Wiklund‐Hörnqvist, Carola; Stillesjö, Sara; Andersson, Micael; Jonsson, Bert; Nyberg, Lars (January 2021). "Retrieval practice facilitates learning by strengthening processing in both the anterior and posterior hippocampus" (in en). Brain and Behavior 11 (1). doi:10.1002/brb3.1909. ISSN 2162-3279. PMID 33094555. PMC 7821628. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.1909. 
  15. Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In A. Healy, S. Kosslyn, & R. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 2, pp. 35-67). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Based upon research done by: Izawa, C (1966). "Reinforcement-test sequences in paired associate learning". Psychological Reports 18 (3): 879–919. doi:10.2466/pr0.1966.18.3.879.  http://bjorklab.psych.ucla.edu/pubs/RBjork_EBjork_1992.pdf
  16. Kornell, Nate; Bjork, Robert A.; Garcia, Michael A. (August 2011). "Why tests appear to prevent forgetting: A distribution-based bifurcation model". Journal of Memory and Language 65 (2): 85–97. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.002. http://web.williams.edu/Psychology/Faculty/Kornell/Publications/Kornell.Bjork.Garcia.2011.pdf. Retrieved 15 May 2015. 
  17. van den Broek, Gesa S. E.; Segers, Eliane; Takashima, Atsuko; Verhoeven, Ludo (2 September 2013). "Do testing effects change over time? Insights from immediate and delayed retrieval speed". Memory 22 (7): 803–812. doi:10.1080/09658211.2013.831455. PMID 23998337. http://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/mE7uP7Dv6EwI6kWhmtfv/full. 
  18. Roediger, H. L.; Karpicke, J. D. (2006). "Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention". Psychological Science 17 (3): 249–255. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x. PMID 16507066. http://psych.wustl.edu/memory/Roddy%20article%20PDF%27s/Roediger%20&%20Karpicke%20(2006)_PsychSci.pdf. Retrieved 17 August 2015. 
  19. Toppino, Thomas C.; Cohen, Michael S. (1 January 2009). "The Testing Effect and the Retention Interval". Experimental Psychology 56 (4): 252–257. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.252. PMID 19439397.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1027%2F1618-3169.56.4.252
  20. Halamish, Vered; Bjork, Robert A. (2011). "When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 37 (4): 801–812. doi:10.1037/a0023219. PMID 21480751.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2Fa0023219
  21. Pyc, Mary A.; Rawson, Katherine A. (May 2009). "Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory?". Journal of Memory and Language 60 (4): 437–447. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.004. http://www2.kent.edu/CAS/Psychology/resources/cml/upload/Pyc-Rawson-2009-JML-pdf.pdf. 
  22. Carpenter, S.K. (2009). "Cue Strength as a Moderator of the Testing Effect: The Benefits of Elaborative Retrieval". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 35 (6): 1563–1569. doi:10.1037/a0017021. PMID 19857026.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2Fa0017021
  23. McDaniel, M.A., &Fisher, R.P. (1991). Tests and test feedback as learning sources. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 192–201.
  24. Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011)
  25. Yang, Chunliang; Potts, Rosalind; Shanks, David R. (2018-04-11). "Enhancing learning and retrieval of new information: a review of the forward testing effect". NPJ Science of Learning 3 (1): 8. doi:10.1038/s41539-018-0024-y. ISSN 2056-7936. PMID 30631469.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=6220253
  26. Karpicke, J. D.; Blunt, J. R. (2011). "Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborate studying with concept of mapping". Science 331 (6018): 772–775. doi:10.1126/science.1199327. PMID 21252317.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1126%2Fscience.1199327
  27. Mulligan, N. W.; Peterson, D. J. (2015). "The negative testing and negative generation effects are eliminated by delay". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 41 (4): 1014–1025. doi:10.1037/xlm0000070. PMID 25329076.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2Fxlm0000070
  28. Yang, Chunliang; Luo, Liang; Vadillo, Miguel A.; Yu, Rongjun; Shanks, David R. (April 2021). "Testing (quizzing) boosts classroom learning: A systematic and meta-analytic review." (in en). Psychological Bulletin 147 (4): 399–435. doi:10.1037/bul0000309. ISSN 1939-1455. http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/bul0000309. 
  29. Kubik, Veit; Gaschler, Robert; Hausman, Hannah (March 2021). "PLAT 20(1) 2021: Enhancing Student Learning in Research and Educational Practice: The Power of Retrieval Practice and Feedback" (in en). Psychology Learning & Teaching 20 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1177/1475725720976462. ISSN 1475-7257. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1475725720976462. 
  30. Pan, Steven C.; Sana, Faria (2021-04-01). "Pretesting versus posttesting: Comparing the pedagogical benefits of errorful generation and retrieval practice." (in en). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. doi:10.1037/xap0000345. ISSN 1939-2192. http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/xap0000345. 
  31. Giebl, Saskia; Mena, Stefany; Storm, Benjamin C.; Bjork, Elizabeth Ligon; Bjork, Robert A. (2021-03-01). "Answer First or Google First? Using the Internet in ways that Enhance, not Impair, One's Subsequent Retention of Needed Information" (in en). Psychology Learning & Teaching 20 (1): 58–75. doi:10.1177/1475725720961593. ISSN 1475-7257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725720961593. 
  32. Karpicke, J. D.; Roediger, H. L. (2008). "The critical importance of retrieval for learning". Science 319 (5865): 966–968. doi:10.1126/science.1152408. PMID 18276894. Bibcode: 2008Sci...319..966K.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1126%2Fscience.1152408
  33. Kroneisen, Meike; Kuepper-Tetzel, Carolina E. (March 2021). "Using Day and Night – Scheduling Retrieval Practice and Sleep" (in en). Psychology Learning & Teaching 20 (1): 40–57. doi:10.1177/1475725720965363. ISSN 1475-7257. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1475725720965363. 
  34. Karpicke, J. D.; Blunt, J. R. (2011-02-11). "Retrieval Practice Produces More Learning than Elaborative Studying with Concept Mapping" (in en). Science 331 (6018): 772–775. doi:10.1126/science.1199327. ISSN 0036-8075. https://www.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1199327. 
  35. Lechuga, M. Teresa; Ortega-Tudela, Juana M.; Gómez-Ariza, Carlos J. (December 2015). "Further evidence that concept mapping is not better than repeated retrieval as a tool for learning from texts" (in en). Learning and Instruction 40: 61–68. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.08.002. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959475215300232. 
  36. Blunt, Janell R.; Karpicke, Jeffrey D. (2014). "Learning with retrieval-based concept mapping." (in en). Journal of Educational Psychology 106 (3): 849–858. doi:10.1037/a0035934. ISSN 1939-2176. http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0035934. 
  37. Kliegl, Oliver; Bäuml, Karl-Heinz T. (October 2021). "When retrieval practice promotes new learning – The critical role of study material" (in en). Journal of Memory and Language 120: 104253. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2021.104253. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749596X2100036X. 
  38. Pan, Steven C.; Rickard, Timothy C. (July 2018). "Transfer of test-enhanced learning: Meta-analytic review and synthesis." (in en). Psychological Bulletin 144 (7): 710–756. doi:10.1037/bul0000151. ISSN 1939-1455. http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/bul0000151. 
  39. Bertilsson, Frida; Stenlund, Tova; Wiklund-Hörnqvist, Carola; Jonsson, Bert (March 2021). "Retrieval Practice: Beneficial for All Students or Moderated by Individual Differences?" (in en). Psychology Learning & Teaching 20 (1): 21–39. doi:10.1177/1475725720973494. ISSN 1475-7257. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1475725720973494. 
  40. Agarwal, Pooja K.; Finley, Jason R.; Rose, Nathan S.; Roediger, Henry L. (2017-07-03). "Benefits from retrieval practice are greater for students with lower working memory capacity" (in en). Memory 25 (6): 764–771. doi:10.1080/09658211.2016.1220579. ISSN 0965-8211. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09658211.2016.1220579. 
  41. "Remember!". http://www.retrievalpractice.org. 
  42. McDaniel, M. A.; Roediger, H. L.; McDermott, K. B. (2007). "Generalizing test-enhanced learning from the laboratory to the classroom". Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14 (2): 200–206. doi:10.3758/bf03194052. PMID 17694901.  https://dx.doi.org/10.3758%2Fbf03194052
  43. Agarwal, P. K.; Bain, P. M.; Chamberlain, R. W. (2012). "The value of applied research: Retrieval practice improves classroom learning and recommendations from a teacher, a principal, and a scientist.". Educational Psychology Review 24 (3): 437–448. doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9210-2. http://psych.wustl.edu/memory/Agarwal/Agarwal_Bain_Chamberlain_2012_EDPR.pdf. Retrieved 12 March 2016. 
  44. Agarwal, Pooja K.; Nunes, Ludmila D.; Blunt, Janell R. (2021-03-14). "Retrieval Practice Consistently Benefits Student Learning: a Systematic Review of Applied Research in Schools and Classrooms" (in en). Educational Psychology Review. doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09595-9. ISSN 1040-726X. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10648-021-09595-9. 
  45. Perry, T; Lea, R; Jørgensen, C, R.; Cordingley, P.; Shapiro, K.; Youdell, D (July 2021). Cognitive Science Approaches in the Classroom (Report). London: Education Endowment Foundation. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/evidence-summaries/evidencereviews/cognitive-science-approaches-in-the-classroom/. [clarification needed]
  46. Roediger, Henry L.; Agarwal, Pooja K.; McDaniel, Mark A.; McDermott, Kathleen B. (2011). "Test-enhanced learning in the classroom: Long-term improvements from quizzing." (in en). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 17 (4): 382–395. doi:10.1037/a0026252. ISSN 1939-2192. http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0026252. 
  47. Sotola, Lukas K.; Crede, Marcus (June 2021). "Regarding Class Quizzes: a Meta-analytic Synthesis of Studies on the Relationship Between Frequent Low-Stakes Testing and Class Performance" (in en). Educational Psychology Review 33 (2): 407–426. doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09563-9. ISSN 1040-726X. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10648-020-09563-9. 
  48. "Testing Effect" (in en). https://teach.com/what/teachers-know/testing-effect/. 
  49. Agarwal, Pooja K.; =Patrice M. Bain (2019). Powerful teaching: unleash the science of learning. San Francisco. ISBN 978-1-119-52185-3. OCLC 1089840036.  http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1089840036
  50. Ferlazzo, Larry (2021-02-21). "Ten Ways to Use Retrieval Practice in the Classroom (Opinion)" (in en). https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/opinion-ten-ways-to-use-retrieval-practice-in-the-classroom/2021/02. 
  51. Jones, Kate (2020). Retrieval Practice: Resources and research for every classroom. John Catt Educational. ISBN 978-1912906581. 
  52. Cooper, Avraham Z.; Verbeck, Nicole; McCallister, Jennifer W.; Spitzer, Carleen R. (2020-12-01). "Incorporating Retrieval Practice Into Intensive Care Unit Teaching Rounds: A Feasibility Study" (in en). Journal of Graduate Medical Education 12 (6): 778–781. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-20-00082.1. ISSN 1949-8357. PMID 33391605. PMC 7771589. https://meridian.allenpress.com/jgme/article/12/6/778/447989/Incorporating-Retrieval-Practice-Into-Intensive. 
  53. Nelson, Adin (2021-04-02). "Additional Benefits of Incorporating Retrieval Practice Into Teaching Rounds" (in en). Journal of Graduate Medical Education 13 (2): 293–293. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-20-01478.1. ISSN 1949-8357. PMID 33897968. PMC 8054592. https://meridian.allenpress.com/jgme/article/13/2/293/464050/Additional-Benefits-of-Incorporating-Retrieval. 
  54. Dobson, John L. (June 2013). "Retrieval practice is an efficient method of enhancing the retention of anatomy and physiology information" (in en). Advances in Physiology Education 37 (2): 184–191. doi:10.1152/advan.00174.2012. ISSN 1043-4046. https://www.physiology.org/doi/10.1152/advan.00174.2012. 
  55. Brown, Peter C.; Henry L. Roediger III; Mark A. McDaniel (2014). Make it stick: the science of successful learning. Cambridge, MA. ISBN 978-0-674-72901-8. OCLC 859168651.  http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/859168651
  56. Carey, Benedict (2010-09-06). "Forget What You Know About Good Study Habits" (in en-US). The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/07/health/views/07mind.html. 
  57. Lahey, Jessica (2014-01-21). "Students Should Be Tested More, Not Less" (in en). https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2014/01/students-should-be-tested-more-not-less/283195/. 
  58. van Gog, Tamara; Sweller, John (2015-06-01). "Not New, but Nearly Forgotten: the Testing Effect Decreases or even Disappears as the Complexity of Learning Materials Increases" (in en). Educational Psychology Review 27 (2): 247–264. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9310-x. ISSN 1573-336X. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9310-x. 
  59. Karpicke, Jeffrey D.; Aue, William R. (June 2015). "The Testing Effect Is Alive and Well with Complex Materials" (in en). Educational Psychology Review 27 (2): 317–326. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9309-3. ISSN 1040-726X. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10648-015-9309-3. 
More
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
View Times: 12.0K
Entry Collection: HandWiki
Revision: 1 time (View History)
Update Date: 20 Oct 2022
Notice
You are not a member of the advisory board for this topic. If you want to update advisory board member profile, please contact office@encyclopedia.pub.
OK
Confirm
Only members of the Encyclopedia advisory board for this topic are allowed to note entries. Would you like to become an advisory board member of the Encyclopedia?
Yes
No
${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
There is no comment~
${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
${ selectedItem.replyTextCharacter }/${ selectedItem.replyMaxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
Confirm
Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Academic Video Service