Video Upload Options

References

1. Humphreys G., Price C., Riddoch J. (1999). "From objects to names: A cognitive neuroscience approach". Psychological Research 62 (2–3): 118–130. doi:10.1007/s004260050046. PMID 10472198.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs004260050046
2. Riddoch, M., & Humphreys, G. (2001). Object Recognition. In B. Rapp (Ed.), Handbook of Cognitive Neuropsychology. Hove: Psychology Press.
3. Ward, J. (2006). The Student's Guide to Cognitive Neuroscience. New York: Psychology Press.
4. Bar M (2003). "A cortical mechanism for triggering top-down facilitation in visual object recognition". Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15 (4): 600–609. doi:10.1162/089892903321662976. PMID 12803970.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1162%2F089892903321662976
5. DiCarlo JJ, Cox DD (2007) Untangling invariant object recognition. Trends Cogn Sci. 11(8):333-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.010
6. Richer F., Boulet C. (1999). "Frontal lesions and fluctuations in response preparation". Brain and Cognition 40 (1): 234–238. doi:10.1006/brcg.1998.1067. PMID 10373286. http://www.iusmm.ca/documents/Simple%20and%20complex%20motor%20processing%20in%20chronic%20tic%20disorders.pdf. 
7. Schenden, Haline (2008). "Where vision meets memory: Prefrontal-posterior networks for visual object constancy during categorization and recognition.". Neuropsychology & Neurolog 18 (7): 1695–1711. 
8. Burgund, E. Darcy; Marsolek, Chad J. (2000). "Viewpoint-invariant and viewpoint-dependent object recognition in dissociable neural subsystems" (in en). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 7 (3): 480–489. doi:10.3758/BF03214360. ISSN 1069-9384. PMID 11082854.  https://dx.doi.org/10.3758%2FBF03214360
9. Yunfeng, Yi (2009). "A computational model that recovers the 3D shape of an object from a single 2D retinal representation.". Vision Research 49 (9): 979–991. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.05.013. PMID 18621410.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.visres.2008.05.013
10. Rosenberg, Ari (2013). "The visual representation of 3D object orientation in parietal cortex". The Journal of Neuroscience 33 (49): 19352–19361. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3174-13.2013. PMID 24305830.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=3850047
11. Biederman I (1987). "Recognition by components: A theory of human image understanding". Psychological Review 94 (2): 115–147. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.115. PMID 3575582.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F0033-295x.94.2.115
12. Tarr M., Bulthoff H. (1995). "Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993)". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (6): 1494–1505. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.6.1494.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F0096-1523.21.6.1494
13. Peterson, M. A., & Rhodes, G. (Eds.). (2003). Perception of Faces, Objects and Scenes: Analytic and Holistic Processes. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Ungerleider, L.G., Mishkin, M., 1982. Two cortical visual systems.In: Ingle, D.J., Goodale, M.A., Mansfield, R.J.W. (Eds.), Analysis of Visual Behavior. InMIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 549–586.
15. Goodale M., Milner A. (1992). "Separate visual pathways for perception and action". Trends in Neurosciences 15 (1): 20–25. doi:10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8. PMID 1374953.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2F0166-2236%2892%2990344-8
16. Spiridon M., Fischl B., Kanwisher N. (2006). "Location and spatial profile of category-specific regions in human extrastriate cortex". Human Brain Mapping 27 (1): 77–89. doi:10.1002/hbm.20169. PMID 15966002.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=3264054
17. Kourtzi Z., Kanwisher N. (2001). "Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex". Science 293 (5534): 1506–1509. doi:10.1126/science.1061133. PMID 11520991. https://semanticscholar.org/paper/5cf9d94bbc13c5ac2f3a85c86f100643df54a1f2. 
18. Grill-Spector K.; Kushnir T.; Edelman S.; Itzchak Y.; Malach R. (1998). "Cue-invariant activation in object-related areas of the human occipital lobe". Neuron 21 (1): 191–202. doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80526-7. PMID 9697863.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fs0896-6273%2800%2980526-7
19. Malach R. et al. (1995). "Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 92 (18): 8135–8139. doi:10.1073/pnas.92.18.8135. PMID 7667258.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=41110
20. Grill-Spector K., Kourtzi Z., Kanwisher N. (2001). "The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition". Vision Research 42 (10–11): 1409–1422. doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00073-6. PMID 11322983.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fs0042-6989%2801%2900073-6
21. Ungerleider, L.G., Mishkin, M., 1982. Two cortical visual systems. In: Ingle, D.J., Goodale, M.A., Mansfield, R.J.W. (Eds.), Analysis of Visual Behavior. InMIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 549–586.
22. Collins and Curby (2013). "Conceptual knowledge attenuates viewpoint dependency in visual object recognition". Visual Cognition 21. 
23. Helbig (2009). Action observation can prime visual object recognition. 
24. Kellenbach M., Hovius M., Patterson K. (2005). "A PET study of visual and semantic knowledge about objects". Cortex 41 (2): 121–132. doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70887-6. PMID 15714895.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fs0010-9452%2808%2970887-6
25. Wierenga C., Perlstein W., Benjamin M., Leonard C., Rothi L., Conway T. (2009). "Neural substrates of object identification: Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence that category and visual attribute contribute to semantic knowledge". Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 15 (2): 169–181. doi:10.1017/s1355617709090468. PMID 19232155.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1017%2Fs1355617709090468
26. Gerlach C (2009). "Category-specificity in visual object recognition". Cognition 111 (3): 281–301. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.005. PMID 19324331.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.cognition.2009.02.005
27. Mechelli A., Sartori G., Orlandi P., Price C. (2006). "Semantic relevance explains category effects in medial fusiform gyri". NeuroImage 30 (3): 992–1002. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.10.017. PMID 16343950.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.neuroimage.2005.10.017
28. Bar M., Ullman S. (1996). "Spatial context in recognition". Perception 25 (3): 343–352. doi:10.1068/p250343. PMID 8804097. https://semanticscholar.org/paper/5dee65f0a49765629ed282c87f835975b8a7d193. 
29. Bar M., Aminoff E. (2003). "Cortical analysis of visual context". Neuron 38 (2): 347–358. doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00167-3. PMID 12718867.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fs0896-6273%2803%2900167-3
30. Brady TF, Konkle T, Alvarez GA, Oliva A (2008) Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(38):14325-9.
31. Barenholtz (2014). "Quantifying the role of context in visual object recognition". Visual Cognition 22. 
32. Theurel (2016). "The integration of visual context information in facial emotion recognition in 5- to 15-year-olds". Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 150: 252–271. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2016.06.004. PMID 27367301.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jecp.2016.06.004
33. Ward, J. (2006). The Student's Guide to Cognitive Neuroscience. New York: Psychology Press
34. Bulthoff I., Newell F. (2006). The role of familiarity in the recognition of static and dynamic objects. 154. 315–325. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(06)54017-8. ISBN 9780444529664.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2FS0079-6123%2806%2954017-8
35. Vuong, Q., & Tarr, M. (2004). Rotation direction affects object recognition
36. Norman G., Eacott M. (2004). "Impaired object recognition with increasing levels of feature ambiguity in rats with perirhinal cortex lesions". Behavioural Brain Research 148 (1–2): 79–91. doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(03)00176-1. PMID 14684250.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fs0166-4328%2803%2900176-1
37. Bachevalier, J., Beauregard, M., & Alvarado, M. C. (1999). Long-term effects of neonatal damage to the hippocampal formation and amygdaloid complex on object discrimination and object recognition in rhesus monkeys. Behavioral Neuroscience, 113.
38. Aggleton J. P., Blindt H. S., Rawlins J. N. P. (1989). "Effects of amygdaloid and Amygdaloid–Hippocampal lesions on object recognition and spatial working memory in rats". Behavioral Neuroscience 103 (5): 962–974. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.103.5.962. https://semanticscholar.org/paper/62ad0fe6a00c396d2f924331ac03a0eaa7fcb9c8. 
39. Ennaceur A. B. D. E. L. K. A. D. E. R. (1998). "Effects of lesions of the substantia Innominata/ventral pallidum, globus pallidus and medial septum on rat's performance in object-recognition and radial-maze tasks: Physostigmine and amphetamine treatments". Pharmacological Research 38 (4): 251–263. doi:10.1006/phrs.1998.0361. PMID 9774488.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1006%2Fphrs.1998.0361
40. Bauer, R. M. (2006). The agnosias. DC, US: American Psychological Association: Washington
41. Hajilou B. B., Done D. J. (2007). "Evidence for a dissociation of structural and semantic knowledge in dementia of the alzheimer type (DAT)". Neuropsychologia 45 (4): 810–816. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.08.008. PMID 17034821.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.neuropsychologia.2006.08.008
42. Laatu S., Jaykka H., Portin R., Rinne J. (2003). "Visual object recognition in early Alzheimer's disease: deficits in semantic processing". Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 108 (2): 82–89. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0404.2003.00097.x. PMID 12859283.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1034%2Fj.1600-0404.2003.00097.x