Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Hisashi Kato-Noguchi
 -- 1440 2022-10-11 02:21:47 |
2 format correct
Conner Chen
 + 2 word(s) 1442 2022-10-11 08:16:04 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Kato-Noguchi, H. Effects of Imperata cylindrica on Microbial Community. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/28753 (accessed on 28 October 2024).
Kato-Noguchi H. Effects of Imperata cylindrica on Microbial Community. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/28753. Accessed October 28, 2024.
Kato-Noguchi, Hisashi. "Effects of Imperata cylindrica on Microbial Community" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/28753 (accessed October 28, 2024).
Kato-Noguchi, H. (2022, October 11). Effects of Imperata cylindrica on Microbial Community. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/28753
Kato-Noguchi, Hisashi. "Effects of Imperata cylindrica on Microbial Community." Encyclopedia. Web. 11 October, 2022.
Effects of Imperata cylindrica on Microbial Community
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/plants11192551

Imperata cylindrica (I. cylindrica) is native to Southeast Asia and East Africa and has become naturalized in humid tropics, subtropics and warmer temperate zones of the world. The species is one of the top ten worst weeds in the worlds and is listed among the world’s top 100 worst invasive alien species. I. cylindrica was reported to affect the microbial flora in the soil of invaded areas and enhance the decomposition process of the plant residue

allelochemical decomposition invasive species monospecific stand

1. Introduction

Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv., belonging to Poaceae, is a C4 perennial rhizomatous grass species (Figure 1). This species has an extensive rhizome network. The rhizome development of I. cylindrica occurs 3–12 weeks after germination, beginning with downward growth. When the rhizome develops cataphylls, it grows horizontally, and the tip of the rhizome begins to turn upward between the fifth and sixth leaf stages. Then, a secondary shoot and rhizome arise from the apical bud and subapical bud of the first rhizome, respectively. The secondary rhizome produces the third shoot and rhizome, continuing the following shoot and rhizome formations [1][2][3][4][5]. It was reported that one plant produced 31 rhizomes in 10 months, with a total rhizome length of 12 m [6]. The shoots form loose to compact tufts. Several leaf sheaths are often tightly rolled together, forming a cylindrical culm. I. cylindrica is virtually stemless, except for the flowering stalks. The leaves are flat, slender (4–10 mm in wide) and linear–lanceolate (15–150 cm in length, depending on the growth condition), possessing serrated margins embedded with sharp silica crystals. Stomata are present on both surfaces of the leaves [7][8][9][10].
Plants 11 02551 g001
Figure 1. Imperata cylindrica. Photos were kindly provided by Dr. T. Tominaga.
I. cylindrica is native to Southeast Asia and East Africa and has become naturalized in humid tropics, subtropics and warmer temperate zones of the world [1][11][12][13][14]. The species is considered one of the top ten worst weeds in the world and is listed among the world’s top 100 worst invasive alien species [1][12][13]. I. cylindrica thrives in the 10 southeastern states of the USA, the Mediterranean region, northern Africa to the Middle East, tropical and subtropical Asia, Australia and the Pacific Islands, covering more than 500 million hectares worldwide [3][12][13][15][16][17]. Very large monospecific stands of I. cylindrica of more than 10,000 hectares in size, known as mega grasslands, are often observed in Indonesia as a climax species [18][19]. Large monospecific stands are also observed in Africa from Egypt to Ethiopia [1]. The species grows between latitudes 45° N (e.g., Japan) and 45° S (New Zealand) and from sea level to more than 2000 m in elevation [20][21].
The characteristics of life history, such as high reproduction and growth rates, competitive ability and phenotypic plasticity, of the plants are important for the naturalization of invasive plants into non-native ranges [22][23][24][25]. I. cylindrica is also a prolific seed producer, although its flowering is variable, depending on the environmental conditions. The inflorescence of I. cylindrica is 10–20 cm in length, with approximately 400 spikelets, which are 3–6 cm in length and covered with short, white hairs [5][7][8]. (Figure 1). A single plant produces 500–3000 seeds, which are contained in the spikelets. The movement of the seeds was reported to generally span 15 m, traveled distances of as much as 24 km with the spikelets through wind dispersal [1][26][27]. The germination rate is 30–98%, depending on the conditions [8][28][29].
Vegetative reproduction maintains local stands of I. cylindrica and contributes to spread the plant in its vicinity. When rhizome pieces are dispersed by human activities and other disturbing factors, such as a hurricane, the establishment of new populations arises from rhizome pieces. The regeneration of I. cylindrica can occur within a small amount of rhizomes—as much as 0.1 g [30]. I. cylindrica rhizomes are also very fertile [31]. It was estimated that I. cylindrica produces 6 tons of rhizome biomass per hectare, with more than 4.5 million shoots and 10 metric tons of leaf biomass [32]. Terry et al. [33] also estimated a rhizome biomass of 40 tons per hectare. Over the course of 6 weeks, rhizomes were reported to develop 350 shoots, covering an area of 4 m2 [34]. The extensive growth of I. cylindrica results dense mats of rhizomes in the soil, forming thick monospecific patches [32][33] (Figure 1).
I. cylindrica is an excellent competitor for nutrients. Its ability to absorb phosphorus, nitrogen and potassium is higher than that of native pine savanna plants, including Pinus taeda L. [35][36][37]. The species was reported to reduce the availability of water and nitrogen in surrounding soil, suppressing the establishment of juvenile P. taeda by 50% [38].
I. cylindrica has also been reported to increase wildfire occurrence and maximum wildfire temperatures [39][40]. High-temperature fire increases the mortality of native herbaceous and juvenile woody plant spices. Because I. cylindrica allocates a significant amount of biomass (over 60%) in below-ground rhizomes, it is able to regenerate quickly from its rhizomes after fires [37][39][41][42]. Therefore, frequent intense fires may result in the conversion of native ecosystems of herbaceous and juvenile woody plants into I. cylindrica-dominated grasslands.
The phenotypic plasticity of I. cylindrica is high, and the species has adapted to a wide range of environmental conditions, such as various soil types, pH values (4.4 to 8.0), organic matter (0.9 to 5%) and nutrients (P; 6 to190 kg/ha, K; 46 to 734 kg/ha) [43]. It thrives in tropical, subtropical and warm temperate areas, where annual rainfall is 750–5000 mm [7]. Its characteristics in terms of floral traits (such as spikelets, anthers and glumes) and leaf traits (such as length and width) vary within the species [27][44][45]. The species can be separated into five major varieties based on growth and morphological characteristics, as well as geographic origin: I. cylindrica var. europa (2n = 40), major (2n = 20), Africana (2n = 60), latifolia (not available) and condensate (not available). The genetic diversity of I. cylindrica in 676 samples from seven southern US states was determined using amplified fragment length polymorphisms, with two genetic lineages identified [46]. Random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis conducted in Florida showed that the species was highly outcrossed [8]. Hybridization may have facilitated the expansion of the species.
The interactions of these invasive plants with natural enemies, such as herbivores and pathogens, are critical for their naturalization. [23][24][47]. Multiple insect predators and fungal pathogens have been identified in I. cylindrica stands. However, none of them caused the extensive damage to the population of I. cylindrica [21]. In addition, methanol extracts of shoots, roots and inflorescences of I. cylindrica showed antifungal activity against the plant pathogen Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. [48].
The chemical interactions of the invasive plants with native plants are also crucial [24][49][50]. Several observations suggest that some invasive plants are allelopathic and that their allelochemicals are toxic to native plant species in the invasive ranges [51][52]. Therefore, allelopathy may among the factors allowing the invasive plants to establish their habitats and naturalize within the invasive ranges [52]. Allelopathy is the chemical interaction between a donor plant and receiver plants through the specific secondary metabolites defined as allelochemicals [53]. Available data from a number of observations under field and laboratory conditions suggest that I. cylindrica is also allelopathic, and possible evidence for the compounds involved in this allelopathy has been accumulated.

2. Effects of I. cylindrica on Microbial Community

Several investigations under field and greenhouse conditions have showed that I. cylindrica altered the microbial community in the rhizosphere soil and affected the growth of several plant species, including crop plants. The decomposition process of an I. cylindrica residue was reported to be significantly faster than that of a local native grass species, Andropogon glomeratus (Walt.) Britton, Sterns & Poggenb. I. cylindrica was reported to affect the microbial flora in the soil of invaded areas and enhance the decomposition process of the plant residue [54]. The enhanced decomposition process of the plant residue may enable increasing nutrient cycling and availability. Although there are many possible explanations for the alteration of the microbial community in the soil, certain compounds of I. cylindrica may be involved in this alteration.
The abundance of mycorrhizal colonization and biomass of fine feeder roots of Pinus taeda L. was significantly suppressed in I. cylindrica-infested plantations compared with plantations not infested by I. cylindrica. The diversity of understory vegetation in pine plantations was also reduced by the presence of I. cylindrica [55]. The invasion of I. cylindrica into a Pinus palustris Mill. community caused significant loss of native plant species and reduced the distinctiveness of the native flora [56]. Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of Mesicago denticulata Greene and Trifolium resupinatum L. was decreased in I. cylindrica-infested fields compared with non-infested fields [57]. The mycorrhizal colonization of some weed species was also suppressed by the presence of I. cylindrica [58]. In addition, the rhizobium nodulation, nitrogen fixation and root growth of Melilotus parviflora Desf. were suppressed when M. parviflora was grown together with I. cylindrica. The populations of some fungi, such as Aspergillus spp., also differed between I. cylindrica-infested soil and non-infested soil [59]. When I. cylindrica was grown with Zea mays L. or Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench for 8 weeks, the biomass of I. cylindrica was not affected by the presence of Z. mays and S. bicolor. However, the biomass of Z. mays and S. bicolor was significantly reduced by the presence of I. cylindrica even under the conditions that eliminated possible nutrient competition [60]. These observations suggest that I. cylindrica may suppress the mycorrhizal colonization and rhizobium nodulation in native plant species, leading to the growth inhibition of these plant species. Although some authors found no direct evidence of allelopathy, they suggested the involvement of I. cylindrica allelopathy in the suppression of mycorrhizal colonization and rhizobium nodulation [54][58][59][60].

References

  1. Holm, L.G.; Pucknett, D.L.; Pancho, J.B.; Herberger, J.P. The World’s Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology; University Press of Hawaii: Honolulu, HI, USA, 1977; pp. 1–609.
  2. Dozier, H.; Gaffney, J.; McDonald, S.; Johnson, E.; Shilling, D. Cogongrass in the United States: History, ecology, impacts, and management. Weed Technol. 1998, 12, 737–743.
  3. MacDonald, G.E. Cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica): Biology, ecology, and management. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2004, 23, 367–380.
  4. Tominaga, T. Growth of seedlings and plants from rhizome pieces of co gongrass (Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv). Weed Biol. Manage. 2003, 3, 193–195.
  5. Tominaga, T.; Nishiwaki, A.; Mizuguti, A.; Ezaki, T. Weed monograph 5: Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv. J. Weed Sci. Tech. 2007, 52, 17–27.
  6. Tominaga, T. Rhizome systems and sprouting pattern of shoots in Imperata cylindrica. Jpn. J. Trop. Agric. 1993, 37, 120–123.
  7. Bryson, C.T.; Carter, R. Cogongrass, Imperata cylindrica, in the United States. Weed Technol. 1993, 7, 1005–1009.
  8. Shilling, D.G.; Bewick, T.A.; Gaffney, J.F.; McDonald, S.K.; Chase, C.A.; Johnson, E.R.R.L. Ecology, Physiology, and Management of Cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica); Final Report; Florida Institute of Phosphate Research: Gainesville, FL, USA, 1997; pp. 1–128.
  9. Sellers, B.A.; Ferrell, J.A.; MacDonald, G.E.; Langeland, K.A.; Floy, S.L. Cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) biology, ecology, and management in Florida grazing land. EDIS 2012, 2012, 8.
  10. Rusdy, M. Imperata cylindrica: Reproduction, dispersal, and controls. CAB Rev. 2020, 15, 38.
  11. Evans, H.C. Fungal pathogens of some subtropical and tropical weeds and the possibilities for biological control. Biocontrol. News Info. 1987, 8, 7–30.
  12. Global Invasive Species Database, Species Profile: Imperata cylindrica. Available online: http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/speciesname/Imperata+cylindrica (accessed on 8 August 2022).
  13. Invasive Species Compendium. Imperata cylindrica. Available online: https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/28580 (accessed on 8 August 2022).
  14. National Invasive Species Information Center, Cogongrass. Available online: https://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/terrestrial/plants/cogongrass#cit (accessed on 8 August 2022).
  15. Holzmueller, E.J.; Jose, S. Invasion success of cogongrass, an alien C4 perennial grass, in the southeastern United States: Exploration of the ecological basis. Boil. Invasions 2011, 13, 435–442.
  16. Holzmueller, E.J.; Jose, S. Response of the invasive grass Imperata cylindrica to disturbance in the southeastern forests, USA. Forests 2012, 3, 853–863.
  17. EDDMapS. Early Detection & Distribution Mapping System. The University of Georgia-Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health. Available online: http://www.eddmaps.org/ (accessed on 8 August 2022).
  18. Suryatna, E.S.; McIntosh, J.L. Food Crops Production and Control of Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv. on Small Farms. In Proceedings of BIOTROP Workshop on Alang-Alang in Bogor, 27–29 July 1976; Biotropica Special Publication: Bogor, Indonesia, 1980; pp. 135–147.
  19. Garrity, D.P.; Aqustin, P.C. Historical land use evolution in a tropical acid upland agroecosystem. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1995, 53, 83–95.
  20. Pacific Island Ecosystems at Risk (PIER). Imperata cylindrica. Available online: http://www.hear.org/pier/species/imperata_cylindrica.htm (accessed on 8 August 2022).
  21. van Loan, A.N.; Meeker, J.R.; Minno, M.C. Cogon Grass. In Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States; van Driesche, R., Hoddle, M., Blossy, B., Reardon, D., Riffe, M., Eds.; USDA Forest Service Publication: Morgantown, WV, USA, 2002; pp. 36–372.
  22. Thompson, J.D.; McNeilly, T.; Gray, A.J. Population variation in Spartina anglica C.E. Hubbard. I. Evidence from a common garden experiment. New Phytol. 1991, 117, 115–128.
  23. Mack, R.M. Predicting the identity and fate of plant invaders: Emergent and emerging approaches. Biol. Conserv. 1996, 78, 107–121.
  24. Chengxu, W.; Mingxing, Z.; Xuhui, C.; Bo, Q. Review on allelopathy of exotic invasive plants. Procedia Engin. 2011, 18, 240–246.
  25. Warren, R.J.; Matt Candeias, M.; Labatore, A.; Olejniczak, M.; Yang, L. Multiple mechanisms in woodland plant species invasion. J. Plant Ecol. 2019, 12, 201–209.
  26. Tominaga, T.; Kobayashi, H.; Ueki, K. Intra- and inter-populational variation of Imperata cylindrica var koenigii on Kii-ohshima island of Japan. J. Weed Sci. Tech. 1989, 34, 273–279.
  27. Hubbard, C.E.; Whyte, R.O.; Brown, D.; Gray, A.P. Imperata cylindrica.: Taxonomy, Distribution, Economic Significance and Control; Commonwealth Agriculture Bureaux: Aberystwyth, UK, 1944; pp. 1–63.
  28. Santiago, A. Studies on the Autecology of Imperata cylindrica (L) Beauv. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Grassland Congress, San Paulo, Brazil, 7–20 January 1965; pp. 499–502.
  29. McDonald, S.K.; Shilling, D.G.; Bewick, T.A.; Okoli, C.A.N.; Smith, R. Sexual reproduction by cogongrass, Imperata cylindrica. Proc. South Weed Sci. Soc. 1995, 48, 188.
  30. King, S.E.; Grace, J.B. The effects of soil flooding on the establishment of cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica), a nonindigenous invader of the southeastern United States. Wetlands 2000, 20, 300–306.
  31. Ayeni, A.O.; Duke, W.B. The influence of rhizome features on subsequent regenerative capacity in speargrass (Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv.). Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1985, 13, 309–317.
  32. Soerjani, M. Alang-alang Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beav., pattern of growth as related to its problem of control. Biol. Trop. Bull. 1970, 1, 88–96.
  33. Terry, P.J.; Adjers, G.; Akobundu, I.O.; Anoka, A.U.; Drilling, M.E.; Tjitrosemito, S.; Utomo, M. Herbicides and mechanical control of Imperata cylindrica as a first step in grassland rehabilitation. Agroforest Syst. 1997, 16, 151–179.
  34. Eussen, J.H.H. Biological and Ecological Aspects of Alang-Alang . In Proceedings of BIOTROP Workshop on Alang-Alang in Bogor, 27–29 July 1976; Biotropica Special Publiation: Bogor, Indonesia, 1980; pp. 15–22.
  35. Brewer, J.S.; Cralle, S.P. Phosphorus addition reduces invasion of longleaf pine savanna (Southeastern USA) by an non-indigenous grass (Imperata cylindrica). Plant Ecol. 2003, 167, 237–245.
  36. Collins, A.R.; Jose, S. Cogongrass Invasion Alters Soil Chemical Properties of Natural and Panted Forestlands. In Invasive Plants and Forest Ecosystems; Kohli, R.K., Jose, S., Batish, D., Singh, H., Eds.; CRC press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008; pp. 237–247.
  37. Daneshgar, P.; Jose, S. Imperata cylindrica, an alien invasive grass, maintains control over nitrogen availability in an establishing pine forest. Plant Soil 2009, 320, 209–218.
  38. Daneshgar, P.; Jose, S.; Ramsey, C.; Collins, A.R. Impacts of an invasive grass on the productivity of an establishing pine forest. For. Sci. 2008, 54, 579–587.
  39. Lippincott, C.L. Effects of Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv. (Cogongrass) invasion on fire regime in Florida sandhill (USA). Nat. Areas J. 2000, 20, 140–149.
  40. Fuscoa, E.J.; Finnb, J.T.; Balchc, J.K.R.; Nagyc, R.C.; Bradley, B.A. Invasive grasses increase fire occurrence and frequency across US ecoregions. PNAS 2019, 116, 47.
  41. Sajise, P.E. Evaluation of cogon as a serial stage in Philippine vegetational succession. Diss. Abstr. Int. B 1973, 33, 3040–3041.
  42. King, S.E.; Grace, J.B. The effects of gap size and disturbance type on invasion of wet pine savanna by cogongrass, Imperata cylindrica (Poaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2000, 87, 1279–1286.
  43. Bryson, C.T.; Krutz, L.J.; Ervin, G.N.; Reddy, K.N.; Byrd, J.D., Jr. Ecotype variability and edaphic characteristics for cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) populations in Mississippi. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag. 2010, 3, 199–207.
  44. Santiago, A. Gene ecological aspects of the Imperata weed and practical implications. In Proceedings of BIOTROP Workshop on Alang-Alang in Bogor, 27–29 July 1976; Biotropica Special Publication: Bogor, Indonesia, 1980; pp. 23–24.
  45. Hiatt, D.S.; Flory, S.L. Populations of a widespread invader and co-occurring native species vary in phenotypic plasticity. New Phytol. 2020, 225, 584–594.
  46. Lucardi, R.D.; Wallace, L.E.; Ervin, G.N. Patterns of genetic diversity in highly invasive species: Cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) expansion in the invaded range of the Southern United States (US). Plants 2020, 9, 423.
  47. Keane, R.M.; Crawley, M.J. Exotic plant invsions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17, 164–169.
  48. Javaid, A.; Naqvi, S.F.; Shoaib, A.; Iqbal, S.M. Management of Macrophomina phaseolina by extracts of an allelopathic grass Imperata cylindrica. Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 2015, 52, 37–41.
  49. Callaway, R.M.; Aschehoug, E.T. Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbors: A mechanism for exotic invasion. Science 2000, 290, 521–523.
  50. Callaway, R.M.; Ridenour, W.M. Novel weapons: Invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2004, 2, 419–426.
  51. Cappuccino, N.; Arnason, J.T. Novel chemistry of invasive exotic plants. Biol. Lett. 2006, 2, 189–193.
  52. Meiners, S.J.; Kong, C.H.; Ladwig, L.M.; Pisula, N.L.; Lang, K.A. Developing an ecological context for allelopathy. Plant. Ecol. 2012, 213, 1861–1867.
  53. Rice, E.L. Allelopathy, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1984; pp. 1–422.
  54. Holly, D.C.; Ervin, G.N.; Jackson, C.R.; Diehl, S.V.; Kirker, G.T. Effect of an invasive grass on ambient rates of decomposition and microbial community structure: A search for causality. Biol Invasions 2009, 11, 1855–1868.
  55. Trautwig, A.N.; Eckhardt, L.G.; Loewenstein, N.G.; Hoeksema, J.D.; Carter, E.A.; Nadel, R.L. Cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) affects above and belowground processes in commercial loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) stands. For. Sci. 2017, 63, 10–16.
  56. Brewer, S. Declines in plant species richness and endemic plant species in longleaf pine savannas invaded by Imperata cylindrica. Biol. Invasions 2008, 10, 1257–1264.
  57. Bajwa, R.; Javaid, A.; Tasneem, Z.; Nasim, G. Allelopathy and VA mycorrhiza I. Suppression of VA mycorrhiza in Leguminous plants by phytotoxic exudates of Imperata cylindorica (L.) Beauv. Pak. J. Phytopathol. 1996, 8, 25–27.
  58. Bajwa, R. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizae (AM) and effective microoganisms (EM) on various plant under allelopathic stress. Allelopath. J. 2005, 16, 261–271.
  59. Inderjit, S.; Dakshini, K.M.M. Investigations on some aspects of chemical ecology of cogongrass, Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv. J. Chem. Ecol. 1991, 17, 343–352.
  60. Eussen, J.H.H. Some competitive experiments with alang-alang (Imperta cylindrica (L.) Beauv.) in replacement series. Oecologia 1979, 40, 351–356.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Biology
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Hisashi Kato-Noguchi
View Times: 620
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 11 Oct 2022
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    ScholarVision Creations
    Feedback