Your browser does not fully support modern features. Please upgrade for a smoother experience.
Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic. For video creation, please contact our Academic Video Service.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 handwiki Sirius Huang -- 4685 2022-10-08 05:36:22

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Academic Video Service to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
HandWiki. Natural and Legal Rights. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/28475 (accessed on 26 September 2026).
HandWiki. Natural and Legal Rights. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/28475. Accessed September 26, 2026.
HandWiki. "Natural and Legal Rights" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/28475 (accessed September 26, 2026).
HandWiki. (2022, October 08). Natural and Legal Rights. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/28475
HandWiki. "Natural and Legal Rights." Encyclopedia. Web. 08 October, 2022.
Natural and Legal Rights
Edit

Natural and legal rights are two types of rights. Natural rights are those that are not dependent on the laws or customs of any particular culture or government, and so are universal and inalienable (they cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws). Legal rights are those bestowed onto a person by a given legal system (they can be modified, repealed, and restrained by human laws). The concept of natural law is related to the concept of natural rights. Natural law first appeared in ancient Greek philosophy, and was referred to by Roman philosopher Cicero. It was subsequently alluded to in the Bible, and then developed in the Middle Ages by Catholic philosophers such as Albert the Great and his pupil Thomas Aquinas. During the Age of Enlightenment, the concept of natural laws was used to challenge the divine right of kings, and became an alternative justification for the establishment of a social contract, positive law, and government – and thus legal rights – in the form of classical republicanism. Conversely, the concept of natural rights is used by others to challenge the legitimacy of all such establishments. The idea of human rights is also closely related to that of natural rights: some acknowledge no difference between the two, regarding them as synonymous, while others choose to keep the terms separate to eliminate association with some features traditionally associated with natural rights. Natural rights, in particular, are considered beyond the authority of any government or international body to dismiss. The 1948 United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights is an important legal instrument enshrining one conception of natural rights into international soft law. Natural rights were traditionally viewed as exclusively negative rights, whereas human rights also comprise positive rights. Even on a natural rights conception of human rights, the two terms may not be synonymous. The proposition that animals have natural rights is one that gained the interest of philosophers and legal scholars in the 20th century and into the 21st.

natural law legal rights legal scholars

References

  1. "America's Founding Documents | National Archives". 2016-10-12. https://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/declaration_transcript.html. Retrieved 2017-03-10. 
  2. Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation, T. H. Green, 1883, p.114.
  3. Seneca, De beneficiis, III, 20.
  4. Carlyle, A.J. (1903). A History of Medieval Political Theory in the West. 1. Edinburgh. pp. 8, 9. 
  5. McIlwain, Charles H. (1932). The Growth of Political Thought in the West: From the Greeks to the End of the Middle Ages. New York. pp. 114–15. 
  6. Cicero, De Legibus (Keyes translation), book 1, section 28.
  7. Richard Tuck, Philosophy and Government 1572–1651 (1993), pp. 25-7.
  8. Davis, David Brion. The Problem of Slavery in Western Culture. Cornell University Press, 1966, p. 77.
  9. Martin Luther, Concerning Secular Authority, 1523.
  10. Pauline Maier,American Scripture: Making the Declaration of Independence. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1993, p. 134.
  11. Francis Hutcheson, An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue in Two Treatises (Indianapolis, 2004), pp. 192, 193.
  12. Hutcheson, Francis. A System of Moral Philosophy. London, 1755, pp. 261–2.
  13. Georg W. F. Hegel, Hegel's Philosophy of Right, T.M. Knox, trans., New York: Oxford University Press, 1967 (1821), section 66.
  14. Philmore, J. 1982. The Libertarian Case for Slavery: A Note on Nozick. Philosophical Forum. XIV (Fall 1982): 43–58.
  15. Cassirer, Ernst. The Myth of the State. Yale University Press, 1963, p. 175
  16. Price, Richard. Observations on the Nature of Civil Liberty. 1776, Part I. Reprinted in: Peach, Bernard, (Ed.) Richard Price and the Ethical Foundations of the American Revolution. Duke University Press, 1979.
  17. Price, Richard. Additional Observations on the Nature and Value of Civil Liberty. Reprinted in: Peach, Bernard, (Ed.) Richard Price and the Ethical Foundations of the American Revolution. Duke University Press, 1979, p. 136.
  18. Lynd, Staughton. Intellectual Origins of American Radicalism. Vintage Books, 1969, pp. 56–57.
  19. Garry Wills, 1979. Inventing America. New York: Random House , p. 213 https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random%20House
  20. Wilson, James. Robert Green McCloskey. ed. The Works of James Wilson. 2. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. pp. 586–89 
  21. Finnis, John (2011). Natural Law & Natural Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 23–58. 
  22. Introduction of the Bill of Rights in Congress, 1789 Jun 8, Jul 21, Aug 13, 18–19; Annals 1:424-50, 661–65, 707–17, 757–59, 766.
  23. Harvey, Ray Forrest (1937). Jean Jacques Burlamaqui: A Liberal Tradition in American Constitutionalism. Chapel Hill, N.C.. p. 120. 
  24. Law As Culture and Culture As Law: Essays in Honor of John Phillip Reid Books.google.co.kr. Retrieved on 2013-07-29. https://books.google.com/books?id=IR3HlZ9IQuEC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Law+as+culture+and+culture+as+law:+essays+in+honor+of+John+Phillip+Reid&source=bl&ots=X260ecQgxo&sig=A-CqdA9td0uZGU-ZXR8ZvlacxpI&hl=ko&ei=fiT3S8fUHY3vcMiH1OYL&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCQQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false
  25. Reid, John Phillip (1987). Constitutional History of the American Revolution: The Authority To Tax. Madison, Wis.. pp. 135–36. 
  26. Reid, John Phillip (1986). Constitutional History of the American Revolution: The Authority of Rights. Madison, Wis.. pp. 132–33. 
  27. Pangle, Thomas L. (1988). The Spirit of Modern Republicanism: The Moral Vision of the American Founders and the Philosophy of John Locke. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 
  28. Zuckert, Michael P. (1996). The Natural Rights Republic: Studies in the Foundation of the American Political Tradition. South Bend, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press. 
  29. Zuckert, Michael P. (1998). Natural Rights and the New Republicanism. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 
  30. Zuckert, Michael P. (2002). Launching Liberalism: On Lockean Political Philosophy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. 
  31. Kunze, Fred. "A Biography of John Locke". GMW – University of Groningen. http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/biographies/john-locke/. Retrieved 20 July 2015. 
  32. "Chp 4: Ennobling `Savages', Native America in European natural-rights philosophy, "Exemplar Of Liberty"". https://ratical.org/many_worlds/6Nations/EoL/chp4.html. Retrieved 2017-03-10. 
  33. Tucker, Instead of a Book, p. 350
  34. "Literature of Liberty, Autumn 1981, vol. 4, No. 3 – Online Library of Liberty". http://oll.libertyfund.org/index.php?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=1300&layout=html#chapter_100896. Retrieved 2017-03-10. 
  35. Erich Fromm (1973), The Revolution of Hope: Toward a Humanized Technology, New York: Bantam.
  36. Individual Rights – Ayn Rand Lexicon. Aynrandlexicon.com. Retrieved 2013-07-29. http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/individual_rights.html
  37. "The Ethics of Liberty | Mises Institute". 2005-07-20. https://mises.org/rothbard/ethics/ethics.asp. Retrieved 2017-03-10. 
  38. "Man and Society". The Market for Liberty. p. 11 
  39. Block, Walter (Spring 2003). A Libertarian Theory of Inalienability. 17. Journal of Libertarian Studies. pp. 39–85. https://mises.org/journals/jls/17_2/17_2_3.pdf. 
  40. "A Crusoe Social Philosophy | Mises Institute". https://mises.org/daily/2459#ixzz0nx4DiTmB. Retrieved 2017-03-10. 
  41. "Inalienability and Punishment: A Reply to George Smith | Mises Institute". 2014-07-30. https://mises.org/journals/jls/14_1/14_1_4.pdf. Retrieved 2017-03-10. 
  42. "De Sciuridae Et Homo Sapiens: The Origin Of Rights And Duties" (PDF). http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/pilj/vol13no2/documents/13-2GibbonsArticle.pdf. Retrieved 2017-03-10. 
More
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Political Science
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
View Times: 752
Entry Collection: HandWiki
Revision: 1 time (View History)
Update Date: 08 Oct 2022
Notice
You are not a member of the advisory board for this topic. If you want to update advisory board member profile, please contact office@encyclopedia.pub.
OK
Confirm
Only members of the Encyclopedia advisory board for this topic are allowed to note entries. Would you like to become an advisory board member of the Encyclopedia?
Yes
No
${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
There is no comment~
${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
${ selectedItem.replyTextCharacter }/${ selectedItem.replyMaxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
Confirm
Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Academic Video Service