You're using an outdated browser. Please upgrade to a modern browser for the best experience.
Beta (Plasma Physics)
Edit

The beta of a plasma, symbolized by β, is the ratio of the plasma pressure (p = n kB T) to the magnetic pressure (pmag = B²/2μ0). The term is commonly used in studies of the Sun and Earth's magnetic field, and in the field of fusion power designs. In the fusion power field, plasma is often confined using strong magnets. Since the temperature of the fuel scales with pressure, reactors attempt to reach the highest pressures possible. The costs of large magnets roughly scales like β½. Therefore, beta can be thought of as a ratio of money out to money in for a reactor, and beta can be thought of (very approximately) as an economic indicator of reactor efficiency. For tokamaks, betas of larger than 0.05 or 5% are desired for economically viable electrical production. The same term is also used when discussing the interactions of the solar wind with various magnetic fields. For example, beta in the corona of the Sun is about 0.01.

plasma magnetic pressure solar wind

1. Background

1.1. Fusion Basics

Nuclear fusion occurs when the nuclei of two atoms approach closely enough for the nuclear force to pull them together into a single larger nucleus. The strong force is opposed by the electrostatic force created by the positive charge of the nuclei's protons, pushing the nuclei apart. The amount of energy that is needed to overcome this repulsion is known as the Coulomb barrier. The amount of energy released by the fusion reaction when it occurs may be greater or less than the Coulomb barrier. Generally, lighter nuclei with a smaller number of protons and greater number of neutrons will have the greatest ratio of energy released to energy required, and the majority of fusion power research focusses on the use of deuterium and tritium, two isotopes of hydrogen.

Even using these isotopes, the Coulomb barrier is large enough that the nuclei must be given great amounts of energy before they will fuse. Although there are a number of ways to do this, the simplest is to heat the gas mixture, which, according to the Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution, will result in a small number of particles with the required energy even when the gas as a whole is relatively "cool" compared to the Coulomb barrier energy. In the case of the D-T mixture, rapid fusion will occur when the gas is heated to about 100 million degrees.[1]

1.2. Confinement

This temperature is well beyond the physical limits of any material container that might contain the gases, which has led to a number of different approaches to solving this problem. The main approach relies on the nature of the fuel at high temperatures. When the fusion fuel gasses are heated to the temperatures required for rapid fusion, they will be completely ionized into a plasma, a mixture of electrons and nuclei forming a globally neutral gas. As the particles within the gas are charged, this allows them to be manipulated by electric or magnetic fields. This gives rise to the majority of controlled fusion concepts.

Even if this temperature is reached, the gas will be constantly losing energy to its surroundings (cooling off). This gives rise to the concept of the "confinement time", the amount of time the plasma is maintained at the required temperature. However, the fusion reactions might deposit their energy back into the plasma, heating it back up, which is a function of the density of the plasma. These considerations are combined in the Lawson criterion, or its modern form, the fusion triple product. In order to be efficient, the rate of fusion energy being deposited into the reactor would ideally be greater than the rate of loss to the surroundings, a condition known as "ignition".

1.3. Magnetic Confinement Fusion Approach

In magnetic confinement fusion (MCF) reactor designs, the plasma is confined within a vacuum chamber using a series of magnetic fields. These fields are normally created using a combination of electromagnets and electrical currents running through the plasma itself. Systems using only magnets are generally built using the stellarator approach, while those using current only are the pinch machines. The most studied approach since the 1970s is the tokamak, where the fields generated by the external magnets and internal current are roughly equal in magnitude.

In all of these machines, the density of the particles in the plasma is very low, often described as a "poor vacuum". This limits its approach to the triple product along the temperature and time axis. This requires magnetic fields on the order of tens of Teslas, currents in the megaampere, and confinement times on the order of tens of seconds.[2] Generating currents of this magnitude is relatively simple, and a number of devices from large banks of capacitors to homopolar generators have been used. However, generating the required magnetic fields is another issue, generally requiring expensive superconducting magnets. For any given reactor design, the cost is generally dominated by the cost of the magnets.

2. Beta

Given that the magnets are a dominant factor in reactor design, and that density and temperature combine to produce pressure, the ratio of the pressure of the plasma to the magnetic energy density naturally becomes a useful figure of merit when comparing MCF designs. In effect, the ratio illustrates how effectively a design confines its plasma. This ratio, beta, is widely used in the fusion field:

β=ppmag=nkBTB2/2μ0[3]

β is normally measured in terms of the total magnetic field. However, in any real-world design, the strength of the field varies over the volume of the plasma, so to be specific, the average beta is sometimes referred to as the "beta toroidal". In the tokamak design the total field is a combination of the external toroidal field and the current-induced poloidal one, so the "beta poloidal" is sometimes used to compare the relative strengths of these fields. And as the external magnetic field is the driver of reactor cost, "beta external" is used to consider just this contribution.

2.1. Troyon Beta Limit

In a tokamak, for a stable plasma, β is always much smaller than 1 (otherwise it would collapse).[4] Ideally, a MCF device would want to have as high beta as possible, as this would imply the minimum amount of magnetic force needed for confinement. In practice, most tokamaks operate at beta of order 0.01, or 1%. Spherical tokamaks typically operate at beta values an order of magnitude higher. The record was set by the START device at 0.4, or 40%.[5]

These low achievable betas are due to instabilities in the plasma generated through the interaction of the fields and the motion of the particles due to the induced current. As the amount of current is increased in relation to the external field, these instabilities become uncontrollable. In early pinch experiments the current dominated the field components and the kink and sausage instabilities were common, today collectively referred to as "low-n instabilities". As the relative strength of the external magnetic field is increased, these simple instabilities are damped out, but at a critical field other "high-n instabilities" will invariably appear, notably the ballooning mode. For any given fusion reactor design, there is a limit to the beta it can sustain. As beta is a measure of economic merit, a practical tokamak based fusion reactor must be able to sustain a beta above some critical value, which is calculated to be around 5%.[6]

Through the 1980s the understanding of the high-n instabilities grew considerably. Shafranov and Yurchenko first published on the issue in 1971 in a general discussion of tokamak design, but it was the work by Wesson and Sykes in 1983[7] and Francis Troyon in 1984[8] that developed these concepts fully. Troyon's considerations, or the "Troyon limit", closely matched the real-world performance of existing machines. It has since become so widely used that it is often known simply as the beta limit in tokamaks.

The Troyon limit is given as:

βmax=βNIaB0[9]

Where I is the plasma current, B0 is the external magnetic field, and a is the minor radius of the tokamak (see torus for an explanation of the directions). βN was determined numerically, and is normally given as 0.028 if I is measured in megaamperes. However, it is also common to use 2.8 if βmax is expressed as a percentage.[9]

Given that the Troyon limit suggested a βmax around 2.5 to 4%, and a practical reactor had to have a βmax around 5%, the Troyon limit was a serious concern when it was introduced. However, it was found that βN changed dramatically with the shape of the plasma, and non-circular systems would have much better performance. Experiments on the DIII-D machine (the second D referring to the cross-sectional shape of the plasma) demonstrated higher performance,[10] and the spherical tokamak design outperformed the Troyon limit by about 10 times.[11]

2.2. Astrophysics

Beta is also sometimes used when discussing the interaction of plasma in space with different magnetic fields. A common example is the interaction of the solar wind with the magnetic fields of the Sun[12] or Earth.[13] In this case, the betas of these natural phenomena are generally much smaller than those seen in reactor designs; the Sun's corona has a beta around 1%.[12] Active regions have much higher beta, over 1 in some cases, which makes the area unstable.[14]

References

  1. Bromberg, pg. 18
  2. "Conditions for a fusion reaction" , JET http://www.jet.efda.org/fusion-basics/conditions-for-a-fusion-reaction/
  3. Wesson, J: "Tokamaks", 3rd edition page 115, Oxford University Press, 2004
  4. Kenrō Miyamoto, "Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion", Springer, 2005 , pg. 62 https://books.google.ca/books?id=-tLq4hzVnN8C&;pg=PA62
  5. Alan Sykes, "The Development of the Spherical Tokamak" , ICPP, Fukuoka September 2008 http://www.triam.kyushu-u.ac.jp/ICPP/program/download/12-PL01.pdf
  6. "Scientific Progress in Magnetic Fusion, ITER, and the Fusion Development Path", SLAC Colloquium, 21 April 2003, pg. 17 http://www-project.slac.stanford.edu/lc/local/scenario/talks/Goldston_SLAC.ppt
  7. Alan Sykes et all, Proceedings of 11th European Conference on Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics, 1983, pg. 363
  8. F. Troyon et all, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Volume 26, pg. 209
  9. Friedberg, pg. 397
  10. T. Taylor, "Experimental Achievement of Toroidal Beta Beyond That Predicted by 'Troyon' Scaling", General Atomics, September 1994 https://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/10104172-nWRS2S/webviewable/10104172.pdf
  11. Sykes, pg. 29
  12. Alan Hood, "The Plasma Beta", Magnetohydrostatic Equilibria, 11 January 2000 http://www-solar.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/~alan/sun_course/Chapter3/node3.html
  13. G. Haerendel et all, "High-beta plasma blobs in the morningside plasma sheet", Annales Geophysicae, Volume 17 Number 12, pg. 1592-1601
  14. G. Allan Gary, "Plasma Beta Above a Solar Active region: Rethinking the Paradigm", Solar Physics, Volume 203 (2001), pg. 71–86 http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/papers/garyga/PlasmaBeta.pdf
More
Related Content
The logarithmic derivative has been shown to be a useful tool for data analysis in applied sciences because of either simplifying mathematical procedures or enabling an improved understanding and visualization of structural relationships and dynamic processes. In particular, spatial and temporal variations in signal amplitudes can be described independently of their sign by one and the same compact quantity, the inverse logarithmic derivative. In the special case of a single exponential decay function, this quantity becomes directly identical to the decay time constant. When generalized, the logarithmic derivative enables local gradients of system parameters to be flexibly described by using exponential behavior as a meaningful reference. It can be applied to complex maps of data containing multiple superimposed and alternating ramping or decay functions. Selected examples of experimental and simulated data from time-resolved plasma spectroscopy, multiphoton excitation, and spectroscopy are analyzed in detail, together with reminiscences of early activities in the field. The results demonstrate the capability of the approach to extract specific information on physical processes. Further emerging applications are addressed.
Keywords: spectroscopy; data analysis; logarithmic derivative; temporal decay; nonlinear optics; nonlinear order; multiphoton processes; pulsed lasers; signal processing; overlapping spectral lines
Even with the extremely difficult conditions required to initiate and maintain a controlled nuclear fusion reaction, the opportunity of having a viable energy source that will last for millions of years continues to provide the main initiative for continuing research and development in the field. Because the fuel is available in almost unlimited supply, I believe that fusion energy will become the major power source of the future long after the petroleum sources have depleted and made the internal combustion engine obsolete. Not only is this energy source "clean" and environmentally friendly it also has the potential for higher efficiency in the fuel utilization; nothing is wasted in the conversion process. Nuclear fusion has been attained on the earth in the form of the hydrogen bomb. The Bomb is a form of uncontrolled fusion which has no practical value except to make large holes in the ground quickly and to create Electromagnetic Discharges. Controlled fusion presents unique problems which scientists have yet to solve. Once the problems are solved, fusion power promises to be a source of energy that could be used for a variety of useful productive purposes.
Keywords: thermonuclear; fusion; technology
The Al-Hamed Equation is a novel formulation in nuclear physics that refines the calculation of energy released during nuclear fusion reactions by explicitly incorporating the mass of all secondary particles produced. This contrasts with traditional models, which primarily consider the mass difference between initial and final nuclei, leading to more accurate energy predictions, crucial for optimizing fusion reactor design and ensuring operational safety.
Keywords: Nuclear Fusion; Al-Hamed Equation; Fusion Energy Calculation; Secondary Particles; Nuclear Physics; Reactor Design; Energy Prediction; Nuclear Reactions
This research introduces a new theoretical framework in nuclear physics, referred to as the Al-Hamed Electro-Nuclear Equation, which integrates electric input energy with nuclear mass-energy interactions. Unlike conventional models that consider nuclear energy as solely a function of mass difference, the Al-Hamed model incorporates the energy contribution from electric potentials and includes the cumulative mass of all particles resulting from the nuclear reaction. The proposed equation: E = [(Q × V) + (Δm - S) × c²] accounts for both electrical energy (via charge and voltage) and mass-energy transformations (considering secondary nuclear products such as neutrons, mesons, or photons). This dual approach provides a more comprehensive description of electro-nuclear interactions, especially in scenarios involving controlled fusion or electro-stimulated decay. The paper presents a comparative analysis with traditional equations, applies the model to practical scenarios, and discusses its implications for advanced reactor designs and high-efficiency energy systems.
Keywords: Nuclear Fusion; Mass-Energy Conversion; Energy Derivation; Theoretical Physics; Fusion Energy Optimization
Stars Entry
Stars are massive and luminous spheres of hot plasma. A plasma is a gas that's so hot that the nuclei and the electrons of the atoms have separated, so it's essentially a hot "soup" that contains positive ions (atom nuclei) and electrons. Stars typically consist of 70-75% hydrogen, about 25% helium and some heavier trace elements. The composition can vary significantly, mainly depending on the age of the star and whether it was born in the early times of our universe or more recently. The Sun, for example, is composed of 74.9% hydrogen and 23.8% helium, leaving less than 2% for all other elements heavier than helium. During most of their lifespan stars generate radiant energy by fusing hydrogen into helium, a process that converts mass into energy and releases energy in the form of radiation of various wavelengths. In order to maintain nuclear fusion in their cores, stars have core temperatures ranging from 4 million to 40 million degrees Kelvin. 
Keywords: stars; hydrostatic equilibrium; nuclear fusion
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Others
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
View Times: 787
Entry Collection: HandWiki
Revision: 1 time (View History)
Update Date: 08 Oct 2022
Academic Video Service