Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Tyus J Yeingst
 -- 1535 2022-09-06 21:13:27 |
2 format
Jason Zhu
 Meta information modification 1535 2022-09-07 03:43:46 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Yeingst, T.J.;  Arrizabalaga, J.H.;  Hayes, D.J. Ultrasound-Induced Drug Release from Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/26933 (accessed on 17 November 2024).
Yeingst TJ,  Arrizabalaga JH,  Hayes DJ. Ultrasound-Induced Drug Release from Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/26933. Accessed November 17, 2024.
Yeingst, Tyus J., Julien H. Arrizabalaga, Daniel J. Hayes. "Ultrasound-Induced Drug Release from Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/26933 (accessed November 17, 2024).
Yeingst, T.J.,  Arrizabalaga, J.H., & Hayes, D.J. (2022, September 06). Ultrasound-Induced Drug Release from Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/26933
Yeingst, Tyus J., et al. "Ultrasound-Induced Drug Release from Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels." Encyclopedia. Web. 06 September, 2022.
Ultrasound-Induced Drug Release from Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/gels8090554

Stimuli-responsive hydrogel drug delivery systems are designed to release a payload when prompted by an external stimulus. These platforms have become prominent in the field of drug delivery due to their ability to provide spatial and temporal control for drug release. Among the different external triggers that have been used, ultrasound possesses several advantages: it is non-invasive, has deep tissue penetration, and can safely transmit acoustic energy to a localized area.

hydrogels polymers stimuli-responsive ultrasound drug delivery tissue engineering cancer therapy controlled drug release thermoresponsive materials

1. Introduction

Stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems enable the delivery of payloads on-demand, at a specific time, and at a specific location [1][2][3][4]. These platforms can be designed to respond to a variety of different stimuli, either internal such as redox, pH, or enzymes, or external physical triggers such as magnetic field, ultrasound, light, electricity, or temperature [5][6][7][8][9][10].
For the past 70 years, ultrasound has been extensively used as a diagnostic tool [11][12]. However, it has recently been applied to a broad range of therapeutic applications such as the treatment of vascular thrombosis by dissolving clots, the ablation of tumors, and the healing of bone fractures [12][13][14]. Ultrasound has proven to be both safe and ethical for in vivo use in a variety of applications [15][16]. Ultrasound also induces biological effects that are beneficial for therapeutic applications. It enhances transdermal drug delivery, enhances uptake in cells and tissues, and facilitates wound healing [13][17][18][19][20][21]. Ultrasound provides the capability for a wide variety of applications in the biomedical field including imaging [22], clinical diagnosis [23], therapeutics delivery [20][24][25], detection [26], sensing [27][28], the initiation of chemical and biological processes [29][30][31], and the release of signaling molecules [32].

2. Acoustics

The developing field of responsive hydrogels is reaching new intersection points with external stimulus triggers. Recent developments have brought stimuli-responsive hydrogels into the field of acoustics and ultrasound. In this case, the acoustics field can be defined as the use of mechanical waves for energetic transfer in materials such as solids, liquids, or gases [33][34]. The transfer of energy into and through materials is then converted into specific acoustic responses for each hydrogel. These acoustic responses include payload delivery, modulation of material properties, initiation of biochemical processes, directed assembly, actuation, locomotion, or sensing [33][35][36][37][38].
The positive characteristics of ultrasound acoustics are frequency, wavelength, time, and transmission loss [39]. While acoustic frequencies range anywhere from 1 Hz to over 100 GHz, ultrasound frequencies only make up the range of 20 kHz to 50 MHz [33][34]. This range of frequencies is particularly interesting since it is outside of the range of human hearing [33]. Additionally, these ultrasound frequencies have generally small wavelengths in water, making them extremely compatible with responsive systems used within the human body [40]. The short time scales of ultrasound frequencies also make them extremely efficient in energy exchange [41]. Another positive characteristic is the low amount of transmission loss within the human body in this frequency range [33]. Due to these positive characteristics, ultrasound is an ideal external trigger for stimuli-responsive hydrogels.

3. Acoustic Mechanisms

When using ultrasound acoustics on stimuli-responsive hydrogels, acoustic mechanisms are the pathway in which energy is transferred to induce a response. Acoustic responses typically involve work that is not directly correlated to acoustic waves. The acoustic waves are instead used for energetic transfer through both thermal and non-thermal mechanisms within a responsive hydrogel.
The thermal mechanism is the pathway in which acoustic energy is transferred into thermal energy. The increase in temperature caused by ultrasound irradiation enhances drug diffusion and increases cell permeability [42]. Positive results have been observed with ultrasound-triggered drug release in thermosensitive hydrogels containing colloids such as nanoparticles [43], liposomes [44], and micelles [45]. While the power of high-intensity focused ultrasound is proven to be useful for drug delivery, damage to surrounding cells should be accounted for when considering long-term hyperthermia [46][47][48].
The non-thermal mechanism is the pathway in which acoustic energy is transferred into mechanical energy in the form of oscillation and force [46]. This mechanical energy can take the form of acoustic cavitation. Cavitation is the formation of bubbles within a material, in which the bubble rapidly oscillates and then collapses within itself [49]. Cavitation has been used for drug delivery for chemotherapy [50] and bone regeneration [51][52]. Mechanical energy can also take the form of ultrasonic mechanical force. This mechanical force can be used to cleave unstable bonds [46]. Acoustic radiation force is another form of mechanical energy derived from ultrasound. The forces created by the acoustic waves act on the particles suspended within a fluid, these particles then move, cluster, and interact with one another [53]. The movement and interaction of these particles create acoustic radiation forces, which when paired with low-intensity focused ultrasound can be used for drug delivery and bone regeneration [54][55].
High-intensity focused ultrasound and low-intensity focused ultrasound prove to be effective in drug delivery using both thermal and non-thermal mechanisms in stimuli-responsive hydrogels. High-intensity focused ultrasound is extremely effective when inducing drug release, however possible damages and challenges may occur for sensitive biological systems [33][56]. While low-intensity focused ultrasound may be less powerful, it is at lower risk of damaging sensitive biological systems [57][58]. In scenarios using thermo-responsive hydrogels with hyperthermia as the thermal mechanism, high-intensity focused ultrasound would be ideal [46]. While both forms of focused ultrasound have respective challenges, it is seen that each can be useful for different applications.
Thermo-responsive and ultrasound-responsive hydrogels respond positively to ultrasound acoustics, making focused ultrasound an excellent external trigger for both systems. Both types of hydrogels prove to be responsive to ultrasound stimulation due to the combination of hyperthermia and sonoporation induced by focused ultrasound [46][47][59]. While different mechanisms exist for both types of hydrogels, each transfers acoustic energy into a form of work proven to be useful for drug delivery. Specifically, drug delivery for the purpose of cancer therapeutics and tissue engineering. Thermo-responsive materials paired with focused ultrasound have been used for both cancer treatments [60][61] and tissue repair [62]. Ultrasound-responsive materials paired with focused ultrasound have been used for both chemotherapy [63] and bone tissue engineering [52][64].

4. Designing Hydrogels for Drug Delivery

Rationally designing stimuli-responsive hydrogels to be used for ultrasound-triggered drug delivery requires a thorough understanding of the parameters that affect hydrogel response. These key factors are: bond strength, molecular weight, degree of polymerization, chain units, polymer structure, shape, and molecular assembly [46][65][66]. Rationally designing hydrogels to be as sensitive to ultrasound as possible is critical, as it will greatly decrease the chances of adverse biological effects [12][47].
These parameters are crucial when rationally designing stimuli-responsive hydrogels. Drug release from polymer systems requires relatively low amounts of energy to break, when paired with weaker bonds [67][68][69]. Molecular weight distribution also affects the responsiveness and location of mechanical force acting along a polymer chain [70][71][72]. The degree of polymerization and chain units influence the mechanochemical activity of polymeric materials [73][74][75]. Polymer structure and shape both play a role in the sonomechanical effects of ultrasound on materials [76][77][78]. The designed molecular assembly can also influence the mechanochemical activity of the materials [79][80][81]. The amount of energy used will be lowered by implementing these factors into the design of hydrogel matrices, which will also decrease the chances of surrounding tissue damage.
The factors involving the structure of a stimuli-responsive hydrogel have large effects on drug delivery, but another important parameter is the embedded payload or carrier within the hydrogel matrix. Possible embedded nanocarriers include microbubbles [82], nanoparticles [83][84][85], liposomes [82], loaded nanodroplets [62][86], and micelles [87][88]. Cells can be placed into hydrogel matrices for direct diffusion into the surrounding area [54] or aided by nanocarriers for increased targeting specificity [62]. Proteins have been diffused from hydrogels without direct targeting [89][90][91], or aided by nanocarriers in drug delivery systems [92]. Payloads such as drugs can also be directly diffused from hydrogels [93], or aided by nanocarriers for targeted drug delivery [94]. The rational design of hydrogels for ultrasound-triggered drug release is dependent on both the structural factors of the matrix and the embedded materials within the hydrogel.
While hydrogel matrices affect the response to focused ultrasound, the specific parameters of the applied ultrasound also influence the outcome. Two types of ultrasound can be used, either High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) or Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (LIFU), each being beneficial for different applications [33][55][58]. LIFU is advantageous for applications involving reversible cellular effects [15] and increased tissue regeneration [95]. For instance, Kearney et al. [83] and Levingstone et al. [96] used LIFU at 2.5 min per hour for 5 h with an intensity of 9.6 mW/cm2 to induce bone regeneration aided by BMP-2 release. For applications involving irreversible cell death or tissue ablation, HIFU would most likely be preferred [97]. For example, HIFU was used by Meng et al. [98] and Zhu et al. [99] at a 50% duty cycle with intensities of 6 W/cm2 and 1 W/cm2, respectively, to promote release and uptake in tumor systems.
Ultrasound has proven to be both safe and ethical for in vivo use in a variety of applications [15][16]. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has defined safety guidelines for ultrasound exposure [15]. Criteria such as the mechanical index, thermal index, spatial peak pulse average intensity, and spatial peak temporal average intensity have been defined to stipulate the maximum allowed ultrasound exposure [47][100][101]. Adverse biological effects can be avoided during in vivo ultrasound studies when following these.
Drug delivery applications must be fully understood to rationally design hydrogels specific for each application. The two main applications for ultrasound drug delivery via hydrogel systems are tissue engineering and cancer therapy. Each application features a variety of hydrogel systems, ultrasound parameters, delivery methods, and drugs used.

References

  1. Spiller, K.L.; Vunjak-Novakovic, G. Clinical translation of controlled protein delivery systems for tissue engineering. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2015, 5, 101–115.
  2. Li, J.; Mooney, D.J. Designing hydrogels for controlled drug delivery. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16071.
  3. Brudno, Y.; Mooney, D.J. On-demand drug delivery from local depots. J. Control. Release 2015, 219, 8–17.
  4. Wells, C.M.; Harris, M.; Choi, L.; Murali, V.P.; Guerra, F.D.; Jennings, J.A. Stimuli-Responsive Drug Release from Smart Polymers. J. Funct. Biomater. 2019, 10, 34.
  5. Manouras, T.; Vamvakaki, M. Field responsive materials: Photo-, electro-, magnetic- and ultrasound-sensitive polymers. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 74–96.
  6. Lavrador, P.; Esteves, M.R.; Gaspar, V.M.; Mano, J.F. Stimuli-Responsive Nanocomposite Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2005941.
  7. El-Husseiny, H.M.; Mady, E.A.; Hamabe, L.; Abugomaa, A.; Shimada, K.; Yoshida, T.; Tanaka, T.; Yokoi, A.; Elbadawy, M.; Tanaka, R. Smart/stimuli-responsive hydrogels: Cutting-edge platforms for tissue engineering and other biomedical applications. Mater. Today Bio 2022, 13, 100186.
  8. Sun, Y.; Davis, E. Nanoplatforms for Targeted Stimuli-Responsive Drug Delivery: A Review of Platform Materials and Stimuli-Responsive Release and Targeting Mechanisms. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 746.
  9. Mirvakili, S.M.; Langer, R. Wireless on-demand drug delivery. Nat. Electron. 2021, 4, 464–477.
  10. Yoshida, R. Self-oscillating gels driven by the Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction as novel smart materials. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 3463–3483.
  11. Nielsen, M.B.; Søgaard, S.B.; Bech Andersen, S.; Skjoldbye, B.; Hansen, K.L.; Rafaelsen, S.; Nørgaard, N.; Carlsen, J.F. Highlights of the development in ultrasound during the last 70 years: A historical review. Acta Radiol. 2021, 62, 1499–1514.
  12. Dalecki, D. Mechanical Bioeffects of Ultrasound. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2004, 6, 229–248.
  13. Mitragotri, S. Healing sound: The use of ultrasound in drug delivery and other therapeutic applications. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2005, 4, 255–260.
  14. Elhelf, I.A.S.; Albahar, H.; Shah, U.; Oto, A.; Cressman, E.; Almekkawy, M. High intensity focused ultrasound: The fundamentals, clinical applications and research trends. Diagn. Interv. Imaging 2018, 99, 349–359.
  15. Baek, H.; Pahk, K.J.; Kim, H. A review of low-intensity focused ultrasound for neuromodulation. Biomed. Eng. Lett. 2017, 7, 135–142.
  16. Miller, D.L.; Smith, N.B.; Bailey, M.R.; Czarnota, G.J.; Hynynen, K.; Makin, I.R. Overview of therapeutic ultrasound applications and safety considerations. J. Ultrasound Med. 2012, 31, 623–634.
  17. Zhou, Y.; Liu, G.; Guo, S. Advances in ultrasound-responsive hydrogels for biomedical applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2022.
  18. Huang, D.; Sun, M.; Bu, Y.; Luo, F.; Lin, C.; Lin, Z.; Weng, Z.; Yang, F.; Wu, D. Microcapsule-embedded hydrogel patches for ultrasound responsive and enhanced transdermal delivery of diclofenac sodium. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 2330–2337.
  19. Yang, C.D.; Jessen, J.; Lin, K.Y. Ultrasound-assisted ocular drug delivery: A review of current evidence. J. Clin. Ultrasound 2022, 50, 685–693.
  20. Noble, M.L.; Mourad, P.D.; Ratner, B.D. Digital drug delivery: On–off ultrasound controlled antibiotic release from coated matrices with negligible background leaching. Biomater. Sci. 2014, 2, 893–902.
  21. Zhang, S.; Zhang, S.; Luo, S.; Tang, P.; Wan, M.; Wu, D.; Gao, W. Ultrasound-assisted brain delivery of nanomedicines for brain tumor therapy: Advance and prospect. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2022, 20.
  22. Carovac, A.; Smajlovic, F.; Junuzovic, D. Application of ultrasound in medicine. Acta Inf. Med. 2011, 19, 168–171.
  23. Fowler, J.R.; Gaughan, J.P.; Ilyas, A.M. The Sensitivity and Specificity of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Meta-analysis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2011, 469, 1089–1094.
  24. Ter Haar, G. Therapeutic applications of ultrasound. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2007, 93, 111–129.
  25. Grimaudo, M.A.; Krishnakumar, G.S.; Giusto, E.; Furlani, F.; Bassi, G.; Rossi, A.; Molinari, F.; Lista, F.; Montesi, M.; Panseri, S. Bioactive injectable hydrogels for on demand molecule/cell delivery and for tissue regeneration in the central nervous system. Acta Biomater. 2022, 140, 88–101.
  26. Voit, C.; Schoengen, A.; Schwürzer-Voit, M.; Weber, L.; Ulrich, J.; Sterry, W.; Proebstle, T.M. The role of ultrasound in detection and management of regional disease in melanoma patients. Semin. Oncol. 2002, 29, 353–360.
  27. Piech, D.K.; Johnson, B.C.; Shen, K.; Ghanbari, M.M.; Li, K.Y.; Neely, R.M.; Kay, J.E.; Carmena, J.M.; Maharbiz, M.M.; Muller, R. A wireless millimetre-scale implantable neural stimulator with ultrasonically powered bidirectional communication. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2020, 4, 207–222.
  28. Shi, C.; Andino-Pavlovsky, V.; Lee, S.A.; Costa, T.; Elloian, J.; Konofagou, E.E.; Shepard, K.L. Application of a sub-0.1-mm(3) implantable mote for in vivo real-time wireless temperature sensing. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabf6312.
  29. Wang, X.; Zhong, X.; Gong, F.; Chao, Y.; Cheng, L. Newly developed strategies for improving sonodynamic therapy. Mater. Horiz. 2020, 7, 2028–2046.
  30. Celli, J.P.; Spring, B.Q.; Rizvi, I.; Evans, C.L.; Samkoe, K.S.; Verma, S.; Pogue, B.W.; Hasan, T. Imaging and photodynamic therapy: Mechanisms, monitoring, and optimization. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 2795–2838.
  31. Rosenthal, I.; Sostaric, J.Z.; Riesz, P. Sonodynamic therapy––A review of the synergistic effects of drugs and ultrasound. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2004, 11, 349–363.
  32. Fang, Y.; Cheng, J.; Shen, Z.; You, T.; Ding, S.; Hu, J. Ultrasound-Mediated Release of Gaseous Signaling Molecules for Biomedical Applications. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2022, 43, e2100814.
  33. Athanassiadis, A.G.; Ma, Z.; Moreno-Gomez, N.; Melde, K.; Choi, E.; Goyal, R.; Fischer, P. Ultrasound-Responsive Systems as Components for Smart Materials. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 5165–5208.
  34. Entzian, K.; Aigner, A. Drug Delivery by Ultrasound-Responsive Nanocarriers for Cancer Treatment. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1135.
  35. Low, S.S.; Yew, M.; Lim, C.N.; Chai, W.S.; Low, L.E.; Manickam, S.; Tey, B.T.; Show, P.L. Sonoproduction of nanobiomaterials—A critical review. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2022, 82, 105887.
  36. Norris, E.G.; Dalecki, D.; Hocking, D.C. Acoustic Fabrication of Collagen–Fibronectin Composite Gels Accelerates Microtissue Formation. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2907.
  37. Norris, E.G.; Dalecki, D.; Hocking, D.C. Using Acoustic Fields to Fabricate ECM-Based Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine Applications. Recent Prog. Mater. 2020, 2, 1–24.
  38. Norris, E.G.; Majeski, J.; Wayson, S.E.; Coleman, H.; Choe, R.; Dalecki, D.; Hocking, D.C. Non-invasive acoustic fabrication methods to enhance collagen hydrogel bioactivity. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 125410.
  39. Kinsler, L.E.; Frey, A.R.; Coppens, A.B.; Sanders, J.V. Fundamentals of Acoustics; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2000.
  40. Seidi, F.; Jenjob, R.; Crespy, D. Designing Smart Polymer Conjugates for Controlled Release of Payloads. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 3965–4036.
  41. Zhao, J.; Lee, V.E.; Liu, R.; Priestley, R.D. Responsive Polymers as Smart Nanomaterials Enable Diverse Applications. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 2019, 10, 361–382.
  42. Rapoport, N.Y.; Kennedy, A.M.; Shea, J.E.; Scaife, C.L.; Nam, K.-H. Controlled and targeted tumor chemotherapy by ultrasound-activated nanoemulsions/microbubbles. J. Control. Release 2009, 138, 268–276.
  43. Kaczmarek, K.; Hornowski, T.; Kubovčíková, M.; Timko, M.; Koralewski, M.; Józefczak, A. Heating Induced by Therapeutic Ultrasound in the Presence of Magnetic Nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 11554–11564.
  44. Grüll, H.; Langereis, S. Hyperthermia-triggered drug delivery from temperature-sensitive liposomes using MRI-guided high intensity focused ultrasound. J. Control. Release 2012, 161, 317–327.
  45. Ahmed, S.E.; Martins, A.M.; Husseini, G.A. The use of ultrasound to release chemotherapeutic drugs from micelles and liposomes. J. Drug Target. 2015, 23, 16–42.
  46. Tu, L.; Liao, Z.; Luo, Z.; Wu, Y.L.; Herrmann, A.; Huo, S. Ultrasound-controlled drug release and drug activation for cancer therapy. Exploration 2021, 1, 20210023.
  47. Wu, J.; Nyborg, W.L. Ultrasound, cavitation bubbles and their interaction with cells. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2008, 60, 1103–1116.
  48. Draper, D.O.; Castel, J.C.; Castel, D. Rate of Temperature Increase in Human Muscle During 1 MHz and 3 MHz Continuous Ultrasound. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 1995, 22, 142–150.
  49. Frohly, J.; Labouret, S.; Bruneel, C.; Looten-Baquet, I.; Torguet, R. Ultrasonic cavitation monitoring by acoustic noise power measurement. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2000, 108, 2012–2020.
  50. Coussios, C.C.; Farny, C.H.; Ter Haar, G.; Roy, R.A. Role of acoustic cavitation in the delivery and monitoring of cancer treatment by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). Int. J. Hyperth. 2007, 23, 105–120.
  51. Reher, P.; Elbeshir, E.-N.I.; Harvey, W.; Meghji, S.; Harris, M. The stimulation of bone formation in vitro by therapeutic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1997, 23, 1251–1258.
  52. El-Husseiny, H.M.; Mady, E.A.; El-Dakroury, W.A.; Zewail, M.B.; Noshy, M.; Abdelfatah, A.M.; Doghish, A.S. Smart/stimuli-responsive hydrogels: State-of-the-art platforms for bone tissue engineering. Appl. Mater. Today 2022, 13, 101560.
  53. Doinikov, A.A. Acoustic radiation forces: Classical theory and recent advances. Recent Res. Dev. Acoust. 2003, 1, 39–67.
  54. Veronick, J.A.; Assanah, F.; Piscopo, N.; Kutes, Y.; Vyas, V.; Nair, L.S.; Huey, B.D.; Khan, Y. Mechanically Loading Cell/Hydrogel Constructs with Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound for Bone Repair. Tissue Eng. Part A 2018, 24, 254–263.
  55. McCarthy, C.; Camci-Unal, G. Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound for Bone Tissue Engineering. Micromachines 2021, 12, 1488.
  56. Copelan, A.; Hartman, J.; Chehab, M.; Venkatesan, A. High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound: Current Status for Image-Guided Therapy. Semin. Interv. Radiol. 2015, 32, 398–415.
  57. Bystritsky, A.; Korb, A.S.; Douglas, P.K.; Cohen, M.S.; Melega, W.P.; Mulgaonkar, A.P.; DeSalles, A.; Min, B.-K.; Yoo, S.-S. A review of low-intensity focused ultrasound pulsation. Brain Stimul. 2011, 4, 125–136.
  58. Ogura, M.; Paliwal, S.; Mitragotri, S. Low-frequency sonophoresis: Current status and future prospects. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2008, 60, 1218–1223.
  59. Zardad, A.Z.; Choonara, Y.E.; Du Toit, L.C.; Kumar, P.; Mabrouk, M.; Kondiah, P.P.D.; Pillay, V. A Review of Thermo- and Ultrasound-Responsive Polymeric Systems for Delivery of Chemotherapeutic Agents. Polymers 2016, 8, 359.
  60. Frenkel, V. Ultrasound mediated delivery of drugs and genes to solid tumors. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2008, 60, 1193–1208.
  61. Yang, F.-Y.; Wong, T.-T.; Teng, M.-C.; Liu, R.-S.; Lu, M.; Liang, H.-F.; Wei, M.-C. Focused ultrasound and interleukin-4 receptor-targeted liposomal doxorubicin for enhanced targeted drug delivery and antitumor effect in glioblastoma multiforme. J. Control. Release 2012, 160, 652–658.
  62. Liu, H.; Xiang, X.; Huang, J.; Zhu, B.; Wang, L.; Tang, Y.; Du, F.; Li, L.; Yan, F.; Ma, L.; et al. Ultrasound augmenting injectable chemotaxis hydrogel for articular cartilage repair in osteoarthritis. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2021, 32, 1759–1764.
  63. Fabiilli, M.L.; Haworth, K.J.; Sebastian, I.E.; Kripfgans, O.D.; Carson, P.L.; Fowlkes, J.B. Delivery of Chlorambucil Using an Acoustically-Triggered Perfluoropentane Emulsion. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2010, 36, 1364–1375.
  64. Bez, M.; Sheyn, D.; Tawackoli, W.; Avalos, P.; Shapiro, G.; Giaconi, J.C.; Da, X.; David, S.B.; Gavrity, J.; Awad, H.A.; et al. In situ bone tissue engineering via ultrasound-mediated gene delivery to endogenous progenitor cells in mini-pigs. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9, eaal3128.
  65. Chai, Q.; Jiao, Y.; Yu, X. Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications: Their Characteristics and the Mechanisms behind Them. Gels 2017, 3, 6.
  66. Echeverria, C.; Fernandes, S.; Godinho, M.; Borges, J.; Soares, P. Functional Stimuli-Responsive Gels: Hydrogels and Microgels. Gels 2018, 4, 54.
  67. Wang, Z.J.; Jiang, J.; Mu, Q.; Maeda, S.; Nakajima, T.; Gong, J.P. Azo-Crosslinked Double-Network Hydrogels Enabling Highly Efficient Mechanoradical Generation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 3154–3161.
  68. Lee, B.; Niu, Z.; Wang, J.; Slebodnick, C.; Craig, S.L. Relative Mechanical Strengths of Weak Bonds in Sonochemical Polymer Mechanochemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 10826–10832.
  69. Perera, M.M.; Ayres, N. Dynamic covalent bonds in self-healing, shape memory, and controllable stiffness hydrogels. Polym. Chem. 2020, 11, 1410–1423.
  70. Caruso, M.M.; Davis, D.A.; Shen, Q.; Odom, S.A.; Sottos, N.R.; White, S.R.; Moore, J.S. Mechanically-Induced Chemical Changes in Polymeric Materials. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 5755–5798.
  71. Davis, D.A.; Hamilton, A.; Yang, J.; Cremar, L.D.; Van Gough, D.; Potisek, S.L.; Ong, M.T.; Braun, P.V.; Martínez, T.J.; White, S.R.; et al. Force-induced activation of covalent bonds in mechanoresponsive polymeric materials. Nature 2009, 459, 68–72.
  72. Gandhi, A.; Paul, A.; Sen, S.O.; Sen, K.K. Studies on thermoresponsive polymers: Phase behaviour, drug delivery and biomedical applications. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 10, 99–107.
  73. Cravotto, G.; Cintas, P. Forcing and Controlling Chemical Reactions with Ultrasound. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5476–5478.
  74. May, P.A.; Munaretto, N.F.; Hamoy, M.B.; Robb, M.J.; Moore, J.S. Is Molecular Weight or Degree of Polymerization a Better Descriptor of Ultrasound-Induced Mechanochemical Transduction? ACS Macro Lett. 2016, 5, 177–180.
  75. Potisek, S.L.; Davis, D.A.; Sottos, N.R.; White, S.R.; Moore, J.S. Mechanophore-Linked Addition Polymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 13808–13809.
  76. Xue, L.; Agarwal, U.S.; Lemstra, P.J. Shear Degradation Resistance of Star Polymers during Elongational Flow. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 8825–8832.
  77. Striegel, A.M. Influence of chain architecture on the mechanochemical degradation of macromolecules. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 2003, 56, 117–139.
  78. Ribas-Arino, J.; Shiga, M.; Marx, D. Mechanochemical Transduction of Externally Applied Forces to Mechanophores. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 10609–10614.
  79. Lee, C.K.; Diesendruck, C.E.; Lu, E.; Pickett, A.N.; May, P.A.; Moore, J.S.; Braun, P.V. Solvent Swelling Activation of a Mechanophore in a Polymer Network. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 2690–2694.
  80. Min, Y.; Huang, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Du, B.; Zhang, X.; Fan, Z. Sonochemical Transformation of Epoxy–Amine Thermoset into Soluble and Reusable Polymers. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 316–322.
  81. Black, A.L.; Lenhardt, J.M.; Craig, S.L. From molecular mechanochemistry to stress-responsive materials. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 1655–1663.
  82. Epstein-Barash, H.; Orbey, G.; Polat, B.E.; Ewoldt, R.H.; Feshitan, J.; Langer, R.; Borden, M.A.; Kohane, D.S. A microcomposite hydrogel for repeated on-demand ultrasound-triggered drug delivery. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 5208–5217.
  83. Kearney, C.J.; Skaat, H.; Kennedy, S.M.; Hu, J.; Darnell, M.; Raimondo, T.M.; Mooney, D.J. Switchable Release of Entrapped Nanoparticles from Alginate Hydrogels. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2015, 4, 1634–1639.
  84. Kubota, T.; Kurashina, Y.; Zhao, J.; Ando, K.; Onoe, H. Ultrasound-triggered on-demand drug delivery using hydrogel microbeads with release enhancer. Mater. Des. 2021, 203, 109580.
  85. Jang, K.W.; Seol, D.; Ding, L.; Heo, D.N.; Lee, S.J.; Martin, J.A.; Kwon, I.K. Ultrasound-triggered PLGA microparticle destruction and degradation for controlled delivery of local cytotoxicity and drug release. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 106, 1211–1217.
  86. Li, G.; Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; Jiang, J. A Tough Composite Hydrogel can Controllably Deliver Hydrophobic Drugs under Ultrasound. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2018, 303, 1700483.
  87. Wei, L.; Cai, C.; Lin, J.; Chen, T. Dual-drug delivery system based on hydrogel/micelle composites. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 2606–2613.
  88. De Graaf, A.J.; Azevedo Próspero dos Santos, I.I.; Pieters, E.H.E.; Rijkers, D.T.S.; van Nostrum, C.F.; Vermonden, T.; Kok, R.J.; Hennink, W.E.; Mastrobattista, E. A micelle-shedding thermosensitive hydrogel as sustained release formulation. J. Control. Release 2012, 162, 582–590.
  89. Wu, C.-H.; Sun, M.-K.; Shieh, J.; Chen, C.-S.; Huang, C.-W.; Dai, C.-A.; Chang, S.-W.; Chen, W.-S.; Young, T.-H. Ultrasound-responsive NIPAM-based hydrogels with tunable profile of controlled release of large molecules. Ultrasonics 2018, 83, 157–163.
  90. Yamaguchi, S.; Higashi, K.; Azuma, T.; Okamoto, A. Supramolecular Polymeric Hydrogels for Ultrasound-Guided Protein Release. Biotechnol. J. 2019, 14, 1800530.
  91. Arrizabalaga, J.H.; Smallcomb, M.; Abu-Laban, M.; Liu, Y.; Yeingst, T.J.; Dhawan, A.; Simon, J.C.; Hayes, D.J. Ultrasound-Responsive Hydrogels for On-Demand Protein Release. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2022, 5, 3212–3218.
  92. Hamidi, M.; Azadi, A.; Rafiei, P. Hydrogel nanoparticles in drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2008, 60, 1638–1649.
  93. Emi, T.; Michaud, K.; Orton, E.; Santilli, G.; Linh, C.; O’Connell, M.; Issa, F.; Kennedy, S. Ultrasonic Generation of Pulsatile and Sequential Therapeutic Delivery Profiles from Calcium-Crosslinked Alginate Hydrogels. Molecules 2019, 24, 1048.
  94. An, J.Y.; Um, W.; You, D.G.; Song, Y.; Lee, J.; Van Quy, N.; Joo, H.; Jeon, J.; Park, J.H. Gold-installed hyaluronic acid hydrogel for ultrasound-triggered thermal elevation and on-demand cargo release. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 193, 553–561.
  95. Carvalho, D.C.; Cliquet Júnior, A. The action of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in bones of osteopenic rats. Artif. Organs 2004, 28, 114–118.
  96. Levingstone, T.; Ali, B.; Kearney, C.; Dunne, N. Hydroxyapatite sonosensitization of ultrasound-triggered, thermally responsive hydrogels: An on-demand delivery system for bone repair applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2021, 109, 1622–1633.
  97. Phenix, C.P.; Togtema, M.; Pichardo, S.; Zehbe, I.; Curiel, L. High intensity focused ultrasound technology, its scope and applications in therapy and drug delivery. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 17, 136–153.
  98. Meng, Z.; Zhang, Y.; She, J.; Zhou, X.; Xu, J.; Han, X.; Wang, C.; Zhu, M.; Liu, Z. Ultrasound-Mediated Remotely Controlled Nanovaccine Delivery for Tumor Vaccination and Individualized Cancer Immunotherapy. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 1228–1237.
  99. Zhu, P.; Chen, Y.; Shi, J. Piezocatalytic Tumor Therapy by Ultrasound-Triggered and BaTiO 3 -Mediated Piezoelectricity. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2001976.
  100. Nelson, T.R.; Fowlkes, J.B.; Abramowicz, J.S.; Church, C.C. Ultrasound biosafety considerations for the practicing sonographer and sonologist. J. Ultrasound Med. 2009, 28, 139–150.
  101. Bigelow, T.A.; Church, C.C.; Sandstrom, K.; Abbott, J.G.; Ziskin, M.C.; Edmonds, P.D.; Herman, B.; Thomenius, K.E.; Teo, T.J. The thermal index: Its strengths, weaknesses, and proposed improvements. J. Ultrasound Med. 2011, 30, 714–734.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Engineering, Biomedical
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Tyus J. Yeingst
,
Julien H. Arrizabalaga
,
Daniel J. Hayes
View Times: 521
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 07 Sep 2022
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    ScholarVision Creations
    Feedback