Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Suzannah Gerber
 -- 1407 2022-08-31 16:28:54 |
2 Reference format revised.
Lindsay Dong
 -11 word(s) 1396 2022-09-01 04:00:02 | |
3 Delete "review"
Lindsay Dong
 -1 word(s) 1395 2022-09-01 04:04:46 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Gerber, S.;  Folta, S.C. The Role of Identity in Eating Behaviors. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/26743 (accessed on 16 May 2024).
Gerber S,  Folta SC. The Role of Identity in Eating Behaviors. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/26743. Accessed May 16, 2024.
Gerber, Suzannah, Sara C. Folta. "The Role of Identity in Eating Behaviors" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/26743 (accessed May 16, 2024).
Gerber, S., & Folta, S.C. (2022, August 31). The Role of Identity in Eating Behaviors. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/26743
Gerber, Suzannah and Sara C. Folta. "The Role of Identity in Eating Behaviors." Encyclopedia. Web. 31 August, 2022.
The Role of Identity in Eating Behaviors
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/nu14173456

Identity is a major construct in the fields of psychology and anthropology that can relate to both the maintenance of eating behaviors and cultural sensitivity. Social and self-identities, as well as ethnic, religious, ethical, eater-type, and other behavior-based identities, are associated with eating behavior change and maintenance.  Identity measurements greatly vary in type and complexity, but the most robust include some accounting for multiple identities and identity shifting over time. Multiple aspects of identity reciprocally reinforce eating behaviors, and change maintenance is associated with identity salience and identity centrality. Identity is an important way to understand the internal landscape of individuals and may be underutilized and heterogeneously applied in eating behavior research. The inclusion of identity assessments seems to lead to better outcomes and increased predictive and explanatory power regarding eating behaviors and can be especially meaningful within differing cultural, normative, and environmental scenarios. 

diet identity self-concept psychology culture behavior food

1. Background

Poor diet is the leading cause of non-communicable disease globally [1][2]. It is responsible for approximately 11 million deaths and 255 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) annually, a number which is growing [1]. There is scientific consensus regarding the importance of diet in the prevention and treatment of chronic illness [1][2][3][4][5]. However, most interventions designed to change dietary behavior are of short duration and may be ineffective in achieving long-term change in individuals [6]. Therefore, innovative approaches to long-term dietary behavior change are urgently needed. Given the global nature of this issue, the social disparities that exist in diet quality [7][8][9][10], and the broad role of identity in health behaviors [11][12], it is especially important to identify strategies that can fully account for personal, social, and cultural factors.

1.1. Multi-Disciplinary Theories of Identity

Identity is a major construct in the fields of psychology and anthropology that may be relevant to eating behaviors. The most common identity theories when studying eating behavior stem are Identity Theory (IT) and Social Identity Theory (SIT). According to IT, identities are evolving and multifold [13][14][15]. For instance, an individual may be simultaneously a mother, a software developer, a vegetarian, and a recent immigrant, and each of these identities will have a range of internal motivations, values, and goals. IT aims to assess how an individual’s multiple identities interrelate and how they may vary in centrality and in salience by context [13][16][17][18][19][20]. For example, individuals may shift among components of their identity, thinking and acting somewhat differently depending on whether they are at work or with family. Identities may also shift and change in response to more profound changes in context, such as developing a major illness or immigrating to a new country.
Social Identity Theory (SIT), a second major psychological theory of identity, aims to understand identity as a social construct that develops from group membership and social affiliations [21]. SIT examines the role that identification with a group (in-grouping) plays in the reinforcement of behavior, as well as the anticipation, or fear, of judgement for failing to behave congruently with the group. SIT examines the motives and pressures of conformity, such as in-group stigma and out-group discrimination, and the cognitive dissonance of identity threat when individual members violate their own beliefs [22]. In both IT and SIT, behavior reinforces one’s sense of self—values, social roles, and normative expectations—and signals affinity to groups with whom an individual identifies.
In the realm of health behavior theory, there has been increasing interest in including identity [23][24][25], most notably addedto the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Self-identity was first introduced in the TPB to help account for the salience of internal values as a predictor of intention [26][27]. As such, it is thought to help understand and predict differences in the intentions to perform and sustain behavior based on how important the behavior is to the way someone describes themselves [26][27][28][29]. Self-identity is one of the most common extensions of the TPB and has been shown in multiple meta-analyses to explain an additional 4–6% of the variance in intention and up to 9% when controlling for past behavior [28][30][31][32][33][34].

1.2. Prior Understanding of Identity and Eating Behaviors

In anthropology, food is considered a central part of identity formation [35][36][37]. Using food, cultures demonstrate in-group affiliation, within-group hierarchies, and within- and between-group rituals that reinforce cultural identity [35][38]. How food is chosen, made, served, and eaten all serve to co-construct identities of multiple orders—self-identity, family identity, ethnic identity, national identity, religious identity, and others [39][40][41][42]. On an individual level, the relationship between food and identity is thought to be even more connected. Food choices signal active allegiances with social groups and reinforce norms, stereotypes, and beliefs; and they do so multiple times a day, throughout an individual’s lifespan [35][37][43]. However, the complex and independent effect of identity on eating behaviors has not been extensively summarized.
Changes in eating behaviors require individuals to make effort to change their habits, maintain the change, and perform continual decision-making relevant to that change. It therefore seems reasonable to suggest that identity processing and salience may help explain variations in both the initiation and maintenance of eating behaviors. However, there is scant literature that actively investigates how to capture various identities and how their salience shifts and evolves with respect to eating behaviors [25][35][44][45][46][47][48][49]. Additionally, the roles of identity, identity formation, contextual identity shifting, and identity change throughout the lifespan are also not a major domain of the health behavior theories that are most frequently used to guide changes in eating behaviors. Indeed, identity is only minimally discussed in the major textbooks widely used to train professionals in health behavior theory [50].

2. The Role of Identity in Eating Behaviors

2.1. Operationalization of Identity

Identity is often explored simplistically, and only recently have there been studies that accounted for the influence of multi-fold identities, and the process of identity formation, that may conflict, shape, or augment identity performance. Studies with less comprehensive measures of identity tended to regard identity as a type of motivation or a characteristic of behavior and may confuse identity with other behavioral constructs, such as cultural norms, self-esteem, and habits. There is a need to increase the dimensionality and standardize the evaluation of identity in order to fully understand its explanatory power for eating behaviors and healthy eating behavior changes. Standardized and complex measures of identity would also help ensure a fuller understanding of how identity processes can be used to assist in the adoption of new eating behaviors and adherence to behavior changes.
Identity theories will likely be useful in improving operationalization. Most studies were informed by IT or SIT; however, only some investigated multiple identities [51][52] or how salience and priorities shift depending on context, life changes, self-determined goals, and other factors [15][17][21][40][48][53][54].
Self-identity is one of the most common extensions of the TPB and has been shown in multiple meta-analyses to independently explain an additional 4–6% of the variance in intention and up to 9% when controlling for past behavior [28][30][31][32][33][34]. Most of the studies relied on a modified version of the extension of TPB, itself the most commonly used theoretical approach to identity, and therefore most studies assumed that identity was an a priori construct of the self [29][51][55][56][57]. However, one meta-analysis discussed how its findings suggest a need to disentangle identity from the pre-formed aspects of behavior in TPB such as attitude and intention [28]. In a study based on TPB that had more comprehensive identity measurements, identity explained up to 28.5% of the variance in intention and 5.7% of the variance in the behavior itself [55]. This is meaningful, given that, through meta-analytic methods, TPB only explained 21.2% of variance in eating behaviors and 52.4% of intention [34][58]. Theory advancement papers call for the examination of complex, shifting, and evolving identities [25][35][44][45][46][47][48][49].

2.2. Role of Identity in Eating Behaviors

Individual components of identity, such as group affinity, motivation, salience, centrality, and importance, have demonstrated associational and explanatory value when considered independently, and the research findings suggest the importance of considering more robust and complete measures, such as formation, multi-fold, and changing identities, in order to better understand the role of identity in eating behaviors. In particular, it found that eating behavior and identity have reciprocal and mutually reinforcing roles, and as such omitting the more complex facets of identity may inaccurately attribute directionality to these specific sub-components, including during experimental manipulations. Further research should investigate identity formation and change in order to better understand this reciprocal relationship. The findings also suggest that future research might incorporate a wider theoretical perspective to allow for an understanding of more complex relationships between eating behavior and identity.

References

  1. GBD 2017 Diet Collaborators. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2019, 393, 1958–1972.
  2. Roth, G.A.; Mensah, G.A.; Johnson, C.O.; Addolorato, G.; Ammirati, E.; Baddour, L.M.; Barengo, N.C.; Beaton, A.Z.; Benjamin, E.J.; Benziger, C.P.; et al. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990–2019: Update from the GBD 2019 Study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020, 76, 2982–3021.
  3. Leung, A.W.Y.; Chan, R.S.M.; Sea, M.M.M.; Woo, J. An Overview of Factors Associated with Adherence to Lifestyle Modification Programs for Weight Management in Adults. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 922.
  4. Middleton, K.; Anton, S.; Perri, M. Long-Term Adherence to Health Behavior Change. Am. J. Lifestyle Med. 2013, 7, 395–404.
  5. Schulze, M.B.; Martínez-González, M.A.; Fung, T.T.; Lichtenstein, A.H.; Forouhi, N.G. Food based dietary patterns and chronic disease prevention. BMJ 2018, 361, k2396.
  6. Kwasnicka, D.; Dombrowski, S.U.; White, M.; Sniehotta, F.F. ‘It’s not a diet, it’s a lifestyle’: A longitudinal, data-prompted interview study of weight loss maintenance. Psychol. Health 2019, 34, 963–982.
  7. Wang, Y.; Min, J.; Harris, K.; Khuri, J.; Anderson, L.M. A Systematic Examination of Food Intake and Adaptation to the Food Environment by Refugees Settled in the United States. Adv. Nutr. 2016, 7, 1066–1079.
  8. Méjean, C.; Si Hassen, W.; Gojard, S.; Ducrot, P.; Lampuré, A.; Brug, H.; Lien, N.; Nicolaou, M.; Holdsworth, M.; Terragni, L.; et al. Social disparities in food preparation behaviours: A DEDIPAC study. Nutr. J. 2017, 16, 62.
  9. Pechey, R.; Monsivais, P. Socioeconomic inequalities in the healthiness of food choices: Exploring the contributions of food expenditures. Prev. Med. 2016, 88, 203–209.
  10. Berggreen-Clausen, A.; Hseing Pha, S.; Mölsted Alvesson, H.; Andersson, A.; Daivadanam, M. Food environment interactions after migration: A scoping review on low- and middle-income country immigrants in high-income countries. Public Health Nutr. 2022, 25, 136–158.
  11. Oyserman, D.; Smith, G.; Elmore, K. Identity-Based Motivation: Implications for Health and Health Disparities. J. Soc. Issues 2014, 70, 206–225.
  12. Oyserman, D.; Fisher, O. Social Stigma and Health: An Identity-Based Motivation Perspective. In The Oxford Handbook of Stigma, Discrimination, and Health; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 317–334.
  13. Burke, P.; Stets, J. Identity Theory; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2009.
  14. Stets, J.; Serpe, R. Identity Theory. In Handbook of Social Psychology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 2013.
  15. Berzonsky, M. Handbook of Identity Theory and Research a Social-Cognitive Perspective on Identity Construction; Schwartz, S.J., Luyckx, K., Vignoles, V.L., Eds.; Springer Science + Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 2011.
  16. Stryker, S.; Burke, P. The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Soc. Psychol. Q. 2000, 63, 284–297.
  17. Stryker, S.; Serpe, R. Commitment, Identity Salience, and Role Behavior: A Theory and Research Example. Personality, Roles, and Social Behavior; Ickesed, K.E.W., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1982.
  18. Stryker, S. Identity salience and role performance. J. Marriage Fam. 1968, 4, 558–564.
  19. Burke, P.; Tully, J. The measurement of role/identity. Soc. Forces 1977, 55, 881–897.
  20. Bisogni, C.; Connors, M.; Devine, C.M.; Sobal, J. Who we are and how we eat: A qualitative study of identities in food choice. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2002, 34, 128–139.
  21. Tajfel, H.; Turner, J.C. An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In Organizationl Identity: A Reader; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1979; pp. 56–65.
  22. Scheepers, D.; Ellemers, N. Social Identity Theory. Social Psychology in Action; Sassenberg, V.M.K., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019.
  23. Kwon, H.; Silva, E. Mapping the Landscape of Behavioral Theories: Systematic Literature Review. J. Plan. Lit. 2019, 35, 161–179.
  24. Davis, R.; Campbell, R.; Hildon, Z.; Hobbs, L.; Michie, S. Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: A scoping review. Health Psychol. Rev. 2015, 9, 323–344.
  25. Caldwell, A.E.; Masters, K.S.; Peters, J.C.; Bryan, A.D.; Grigsby, J.; Hooker, S.A.; Wyatt, H.R.; Hill, J.O. Harnessing centered identity transformation to reduce executive function burden for maintenance of health behaviour change: The Maintain IT model. Health Psychol. Rev. 2018, 12, 231–253.
  26. Biddle, B.; Bank, B.; Slavings, R. Norms, preferences, identities and retention decisions. Soc. Psychol. Q. 1987, 50, 322–337.
  27. Charng, H.; Piliavin, J.; Callero, P. Role identity and reasoned action in the prediction of repeated behavior. Soc. Psychol. Q. 1988, 51, 303–317.
  28. Rise, J.; Sheeran, P.; Hukkelberg, S. The role of self-identity in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2010, 40, 1085–1105.
  29. Sparks, P.; Shepherd, R. Self-identity and the theory of planned behavior: Assessing the role of identification with “green consumerism”. Soc. Psychol. Q. 1992, 55, 388–399.
  30. Hagger, M.; Chatzisarantis, N. Self-identity and the theory of planned behaviour: Between- and within-participants analyses. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 2006, 45, 731–757.
  31. Snippe, M.; Peters, G.; Kok, G. The operationalization of self-identity in reasoned action models: A systematic review of self-identity operationalizations in three decades of research. Health Psychol. Behav. Med. 2021, 9, 48–69.
  32. Armitage, C.; Conner, M. Distinguishing Perceptions of Control from Self-Efficacy: Predicting Consumption of a Low-Fat Diet Using the Theory of Planned Behavior. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1999, 42, 669–688.
  33. Dean, M.; Raats, M.; Shepherd, R. The Role of Self-Identity, Past Behavior, and Their Interaction in Predicting Intention to Purchase Fresh and Processed Organic Food. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2012, 42, 669–688.
  34. McEachan, R.; Conner, M.; Taylor, N.J.; Lawton, R.J. Prospective prediction of health-related behaviours with the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta-analysis. Health Psychol. Rev. 2011, 5, 97–144.
  35. Fischler, C. Food, self and identity. Soc. Sci. Inf. 1988, 27, 275–292.
  36. Guillaumie, L.; Godin, G.; Vézina-Im, L. Psychosocial determinants of fruit and vegetable intake in adult population: A systematic review. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2010, 7, 12.
  37. Vartanian, L.; Herman, C.; Polivy, J. Consumption stereotypes and impression management: How you are what you eat. Appetite 2007, 48, 265–277.
  38. Kearney, M.; O’Sullivan, J. Identity shifts as turning points in health behavior change. West. J. Nurs. Res. 2003, 25, 134–152.
  39. Thøgersen, J. Coping with multiple identities related to meat consumption. Psychol. Mark. 2020, 38, 159–182.
  40. Yu, H.; Veeck, A.; Yu, F. Family meals and identity in urban China. J. Consum. Mark. 2015, 32, 505–519.
  41. Strachan, S.; Brawley, L. Reactions to a perceived challenge to identity: A focus on exercise and healthy eating. J. Health Psychol. 2008, 13, 575–588.
  42. Chuck, C.; Fernandes, S.; Hyers, L. Awakening to the politics of food: Politicized diet as social identity. Appetite 2016, 107, 425–436.
  43. Robinson, E.; Blisset, J.; Higgs, S. Social influences on eating: Implications for nutritional interventions. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2013, 26, 166–176.
  44. Kendzierski, D. A Self-Schema Approach to Healthy Eating. J. Am. Psychiatr. Nurses Assoc. 2007, 12, 350–357.
  45. Houser-Marko, L.; Sheldon, K. Motivating behavioral persistence: The self-as-doer construct. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2006, 32, 1037–1049.
  46. Shepperd, A.J.; Rothman, A.J.; Klein, W.M.P. Using self- and identity-regulation to promote health: Promises and challenges. Self Identity 2011, 10, 407–416.
  47. Nezlek, J.; Forestell, C. Vegetarianism as a social identity. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2020, 3, 45–51.
  48. Rosenfeld, D.; Burrow, A. The unified model of vegetarian identity: A conceptual framework for understanding plant-based food choices. Appetite 2017, 112, 78–95.
  49. Rosenfeld, D.; Burrow, A. Vegetarian on purpose: Understanding the motivations of plant-based dieters. Appetite 2017, 116, 456–463.
  50. Glanz, K.; Rimer, B.; Viswanath, K. Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5th ed.; Glanz, R.B.K., Viswanath, K.V., Eds.; Jossey-Bass/Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015.
  51. Louis, W.; Davies, S.; Smith, J.; Terry, D. Pizza and pop and the student identity: The role of referent group norms in healthy and unhealthy eating. J. Soc. Psychol. 2007, 147, 57–74.
  52. Dempsey, R.; McAlaney, J.; Bewick, B. A Critical Appraisal of the Social Norms Approach as an Interventional Strategy for Health-Related Behavior and Attitude Change. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, 2180.
  53. Dominick, J.; Cole, S. Goals as Identities: Boosting perceptions of healthy-eater identity for easier goals pursuit. Motiv. Emot. 2020, 44, 410–426.
  54. Strachan, S.; Brawley, L. Healthy-eater identity and self-efficacy predict healthy eating behavior: A prospective view. J. Health Psychol. 2009, 14, 684–695.
  55. Brouwer, A.; Mosack, K. Expanding the theory of planned behavior to predict healthy eating behaviors: Exploring a healthy eater identity. Nutr. Food Sci. 2015, 45, 39–53.
  56. Hagger, M. Aspects of identity and their influence on intentional behavior: Comparing effects for three health behaviors. Personal. Indivd. Differ. 2007, 42, 355–367.
  57. Pierro, A.; Mannetti, L.; Livi, S. Self-Identity and the Theory of Planned Behavior in the Prediction of Health Behavior and Leisure Activity. Self Identity 2003, 2, 47–60.
  58. Carfora, V.; Caso, D.; Conner, M. The role of self-identity in predicting fruit and vegetable intake. Appetite 2016, 106, 23–29.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
The Role of Identity in Eating Behaviors
Information
Subjects: Behavioral Sciences
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Suzannah Gerber
,
Sara C. Folta
View Times: 1.1K
Revisions: 3 times (View History)
Update Date: 01 Sep 2022
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Feedback