Medical-Waste Blockchain Technology

Version	Summary	Created by	Modification	Content Size	Created at	Operation
1		Son Xuan Ha	--	3648	2022-07-26 11:01:41	\|
2	layout	Camila Xu	+ 12 word(s)	3660	2022-07-26 11:08:20	\| \|
3	layout	Camila Xu	+ 4 word(s)	3664	2022-07-28 08:10:46	\|

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/computers11070113

medical waste management blockchain smart contract

1. Introduction

The problem of waste collection, classification, and treatment is becoming more serious. It is estimated that the world produced about 1.3 billion tons before 2019, and this is expected to increase to 2.2 billion tons of solid waste per year in 2025. On average, each person emits about 0.11–4.54 kg of stable waste per day ^[1]. These solid wastes can come from technological products in daily life (e.g., phones, computers, cameras) or medical care activities (e.g., masks, syringes). One of the reasons that the growth of waste has almost doubled since 2019 is the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Indeed, the amount of household and medical waste has increased dramatically since the outbreak of the disease in the city of Isfahan, Iran ^[2].

Since the last months of 2019, the COVID-19 pandemic has highly affected our lives. The peak of the pandemic in 2020 and 2021 caused an all-time-high demand for COVID-19 medical equipment and supplies. To meet this urgent need, most systems, methods, and technologies today leverage the supply chain of medical equipment and supplies for COVID-19 prevention. However, the waste of these products post-usage is not efficiently managed. Klemevs et al. ^[3] recognized the harmful effects of vaccine production as an attempt to prevent the spread of the pandemic: their production damages the environment, causing a shortage of energy sources for the world. Remarkably, the cold chain is estimated to account for 69.8% of the energy consumed during the vaccination life cycle, in which around 26–99% is dependent on the transport distance. Furthermore, building equipment to meet storage and distribution needs is costly, especially in developing countries. Hence, a system for managing and classifying waste as well as medical supplies during the pandemic is extremely urgent ^[4]. A sustainable supply chain model that responds to an emergency agreement should be emphasized while also considering equity to reduce environmental harm ^[5].

In the current collection, classification, and treatment model, many medical supplies and waste management systems are constructed based on (i) centralized data processing, or (ii) leveraging cloud-based centralized resources to process waste-related data ^[6]. For the centralized processing model, all processing and classification activities are handled independently, lacking cohesion, and are challenging to share with partners ^[7]^[8]. For the cloud-based decentralized processing model, the centralized storage and processing of data from multiple sources often leads to data inconsistencies among the involved parties, thereby creating limited cooperation opportunities for stakeholders ^[9]^[10]. In addition, this model is flawed in providing traceability, reliability, operational transparency, security, and reliability features in processing ^[11]^[12]. On the other hand, a significant factor in the current epidemic problem is the ability to encourage non-face-to-face interaction (i.e., limit face-to-face meetings) to avoid transmission, which has presented a complicated issue for the community, the management of equipment, supplies, and medical waste. As a result, a blockchain-enabled waste management strategy helps make better decisions, improves productivity, is cost-effective, and ensures compliance with ^[1] waste regulations.

Blockchain-based systems developed for waste management mainly focus on solid waste such as electronics, household waste, and agricultural waste. Implemented systems for the treatment and segregation of waste in the medical environment are few and need to be developed in detail. Current blockchain-based projects developed for waste management have implemented several types of services rather than sorting and disposing of waste, e.g., waste collection process management ^[13], vehicle-based shipment monitoring ^[14]^[15], waste classification ^[1], and auditability of waste handler actions ^[16]. A detailed analysis of the approaches and results achieved by start-of-the-art methods is given in the Related Work section. Most of the existing studies are designed on the Ethereum platform to provide a reward-and-punishment mechanism for the stakeholders involved in managing, classifying, and treating waste. The system ensures compliance with user actions via a series of waste management rules defined in the smart contract. However, a technique developed based on Ethereum will be greatly limited in funding and transactions per second (TPS) ^[17]^[18]^[19].

2. Background of Medical-Waste Chain

2.1. Blockchain Technology

Blockchain is well known for the success of Bitcoin ^[20] and is commonly characterized as a transparent, reliable, and decentralized ledger on a peer-to-peer network that manages transaction data on several computers at the same time. As a result, blockchain is seen as a trust circle that allows parties to be autonomous without relying on a single third-party confirmation ^[21].

The public, private, and consortium blockchains are three universally acknowledged forms. Bitcoin and Ethereum are examples of public blockchains. Any anonymous users may join the network, view the blockchain’s content, execute a new transaction, or check the integrity of the blocks. Meanwhile, GemOS, MultiChain, and Eris are typical examples of a private blockchain in which only permitted users can join the network and write or send transactions to the blockchain ^[22]. A consortium blockchain is semiprivate, on the border between public and private blockchains. It is typically connected with the use of enterprise to better business. Hyperledger Fabric ^[23] is a business consortium blockchain framework. Ethereum ^[24] also allows for the creation of consortium blockchains (Golang).

Numerous features and components make blockchain technology useful and advantageous to the participated stakeholders. The smallest data unit on the blockchain that includes records, contracts, and information is called a transaction ^[25]. Any entity connecting to the blockchain is referred to as a node ^[25], and transactions are confirmed by particular nodes (known as miners) by examining the sender as well as the transaction’s content. The nodes combine the complete transactions into blocks ^[25]^[26] and are in charge of determining if the transactions are valid, and if they should be stored on the blockchain.

Ledger ^[27]^[28] is a data storage on a blockchain that uses a consensus algorithm to store immutable, sequential entries in blocks. For each channel, each node keeps a copy of the ledger. For efficient processing, the shared ledger encapsulates the whole transaction history for each channel and adds query capabilities.
Cryptography ^[28] is one of the essential components of blockchain, which allows relevant access, and stores data in immutable blocks with a fixed sequential order, and establishes identity and authenticity.
Consensus ^[28] is another crucial component of blockchain that is connected to how data submissions are accepted onto the distributed ledger. Consensus algorithms ^[29] are used in blockchain technology to maintain a single history of blocks by synchronizing the data inside the chain of blocks to ensure that no contradicted or invalid transactions exist. There are many existing types of consensus rules, such as Proof of Work (PoW), Proof of Stake (PoS), Proof of Authority (PoA), and Proof of Elapsed Time (PoET). According to these algorithms, all participating nodes must prove something for someone to be granted permission to add a block to the current blockchain.

2.2. Smart Contract

2.2.1. Ethereum

Ethereum ^[30] is a decentralized platform to run smart contracts with the support of Turing-complete programming languages. Ethereum is executed by the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) and written in high-end programming languages such as Solidity, Serpent, Low-level Lisp-like Language (LLL), and Mutan. Withdrawal limitations, loops, financial contracts, and gambling markets are possible on the Ethereum platform. Ethereum is now the most popular platform for smart contract development.

2.2.2. Hyperledger Fabric

Hyperledger Fabric ^[23] is an open-source enterprise-grade permission-distributed ledger technology (DLT) platform designed for large-scale commercial use. It has a few essential features that set it apart from other DLT or blockchain systems. Similar to Ethereum, Hyperledger Fabric is also Turing complete. However, unlike Ethereum, which executes smart contracts on virtual machines, Hyperledger code is executed in Docker containers, allowing smart contract applications to run with minimal overhead while sacrificing isolation (i.e., applications in one container are running on top of one operating system). Fabric succeeds in supporting traditional high-end programming languages such as Java and Go (also known as Golang) rather than building Ethereum’s smart contract languages.

The support of multiple programming languages facilitates the development and maintenance of the Fabric platform. Additionally, Fabric assists in mitigating operating costs, including storing and querying information inside the blockchain, and quickly setting requirements for security features and user authorization.

In this research, researchers engage the Hyperledger Fabric platform in building a process that consists of a smart contract to manage the blockchain’s stored data flows and back-end APIs to process input and output data. Then, all these components will be deployed on a container independently run on the peer-to-peer network system inside the Docker-compose platform.

2.3. Hyperledger Caliper

Hyperledger Caliper ^[31] is a standard blockchain apparatus; a Hyperledger project facilitated by the Linux Foundation. It is utilized to gauge the productivity of the particular blockchain execution with a predefined set of usage cases. The performance reports, transaction latency, and resource usage are produced by the Hyperledger Caliper so that the other projects of Hyperledger might leverage these resources. Hyperledger Caliper is an open-source project contributed by Huawei, Hyperchain, Oracle, Bitwise, IBM, and Budapest University of Technology and Economics.

3. Related Work

As explained in the introduction section, medical device management or reverse logistics activities (RLA) play an essential role in adequately managing devices in a medical environment. These operations preserve equipment at the end of its useful life and anticipate the necessary replenishment of missing equipment. However, refurbishing medical devices and anticipating their necessary replenishment is not a straightforward process, as there are many challenges associated with their appropriate repositioning into the medical market. This research uses blockchain-based technology as a possible solution to establish connections with recycling facilities for medical devices and recycling medical waste while considering regulatory-security- and transparency-related compliance. Moreover, in the COVID 19 pandemic, the requirements for handling medical equipment and waste are highly urgent. The essential requirements in this phase are how to provide enough medical supplies, and to limit direct contact between stages. This section summarizes the management systems in three sub-sections: blockchain-based management systems, blockchain-based medical systems, and blockchain-based waste management systems.

3.1. Blockchain-Based Management Systems

Blockchain is a state-sharing and consensus-building technique that fulfills transaction record retention and synchronization of distributed network participant systems ^[32]. The main benefits of a blockchain-based system are the following: (i) there is no centralized server; (ii) all the executed transactions are logged; (iii) information is shared on the distributed ledger for the parties’ assessment; (iv) information is organized into blocks when a new transaction is generated. Within a blockchain structure, researchers can classify three main types: public, private, and consortium (also known as hybrid). According to the developer’s requirements, they can define the corresponding structure and platform; for instance, Bitcoin Core, Ethereum, Hyperledger Fabric ^[33].

Supply chain management integrates core business processes and information. The process goes through many steps, including customers and retailers, wholesalers, manufacturers, and suppliers, which add value to customers and other stakeholders ^[34]. The system incorporates a highly complex process that requires synchronization of various activities, resulting in randomness and supply chain risk ^[35]^[36].

Moreover, Casino has synthesized systems that apply blockchain technology in measurements, including supply chain management, as well as medical supplies ^[25]. There are very few articles that offer blockchain-based approaches to device management. One of them, by Douladiris et al. ^[37], introduced a medical device management model based on blockchain technology. In ^[38], based on structured interviews, the authors assessed the benefits and risks of incorporating the blockchain model in equipment management practices. Farouk et al. ^[39] have developed a theoretical framework that uses blockchain to enhance transparency and information sharing in electronic supply chain management activities for general device management procedures. In the same year, Dasaklis presented a blockchain-enabled architecture and a proof-of-concept implementation of mobile operations ^[16]. In addition, Le et al. ^[40]^[41] also exploit the advantages of blockchain technology to apply the cash-on-delivery model. Furthermore, in the process of delivery and receipt of goods between shippers, Ha Xuan Son et al. developed a transport model based on a blockchain-based decentralized mechanism ^[42].

Hyperledger Fabric is an open-source distributed ledger platform designed for developing permission applications at an enterprise grade. Fabric provides a platform to build fast, efficient, and secure enterprise blockchain applications. It is characterized as being suitable for business-to-business (B2B) transaction services, and its membership services limit the entry of unauthorized participants ^[43]. Due to having a node for verifying the transactions during transaction processing, it is possible to remove uncertain transactions early and quickly. Due to these benefits, and some advantages in the Background section, researchers intend to design a Hyperledger Fabric architecture-based system for blockchain-based management.

3.2. Blockchain-Based Medical Systems

Healthcare is one of the prominent fields where Blockchain is supposed to make a substantial impact. It generates a wide range of opportunities and possibilities in current healthcare systems. Specifically, in 2018, Kumar et al. ^[44] exploited the potential applications of blockchain technology in current healthcare systems to address the trustless and ambiguous aspects of such systems positively. A year later, Marcela et al. ^[45] introduced a blockchain-based peer-to-peer medical platform to manage electronic medical records (EMRs). Their proposal kept the encrypted data in the blockchain and allowed the patients to share the decryption key only with healthcare professionals they trust. Similarly, Wilber et al. ^[46] also surveyed the blockchain-based medical system to highlight the most important requirements in meeting the need for sensitive data protection. Moreover, some papers applied the blockchain architecture to define a healthcare system for specific diseases such as diabetes ^[47] and COVID-19 ^[48].

On the other hand, research on blood supply-chain management has been conducted by several approaches. Blockchain application in the healthcare supply chain is not as common as in other areas; they are considered “vital”. Blockchain solutions are more suitable for healthcare supply chains; however, there are as yet no blockchain solutions in use for healthcare. Although research investigating the application of blockchain in this sector is increasing, it is mainly used for data sharing and recording data, while using it for supply-chain management is rare ^[49]. Some companies, like Imperial Logistics and FarmaTrust, use blockchain to manage pharmaceutical supply chains ^[50]. Other experimental projects such as OrganTree and Dhonor Blockchain also use this technology to connect organ donors, recipients, and practitioners by using incentives such as paying for funeral costs ^[51]. Several articles have investigated blood donation tracking. BloodChain and SmartBag focus on preventing contamination in the supply chain and reducing the spread of HIV in developing countries ^[52]. Another project, called BLOODCHAIN, focuses on motivating blood donors by giving monetary compensation. Wust and Gervais (2018) have proposed a flow chart to emphasize the importance of blockchain applications in tracking the origins of donated blood ^[53]. The model is presented and discussed in the research to see whether blockchain can solve the problem; however, the situation has not been solved well. Nga et al. ^[54] applied blockchain to store and deliver the volunteer blood donations.

Several blockchain-based systems are introduced to define authorized users (i.e., parties) who can process the patient’s privacy data for healthcare emergencies. For instance, Son et al. ^[55] developed a blockchain-based technology for dealing with crises in patient-centered systems, where the patient is allowed to define the privacy policy for all data collection requests in an emergency. In other words, these data could not allow access in a normal situation without permission from the owner. Moreover, Trieu et al. ^[17] extended this model to give more management power to patients. Researchers define the access control model, in this paper, as more fine-grained in the privacy policy. Specifically, the users can explain the procedure depending on the time or place rather than the fixed policy.

Some approaches use a blockchain-based system to share the collected data among the healthcare centers, and to support the users in controlling their medical data. It means the patients could choose what kind of information related to their health history will be shared with the clinics, including sensitive information ^[56]. Moreover, Nghia et al. ^[57] introduced the SmartCare system to combine the history of medical resources from the other centers in the diagnosis phase to improve the treatment process.

3.3. Blockchain-Based Waste Management System

The removal or segregation of wastes, especially medical waste, continues to contaminate our ecosystem ^[58]. As an obvious example, 99% of items (including medical equipment and supplies) become trash within the first six months of first use ^[59]. This problem can be viewed as a catastrophic failure in material recovery. In particular, the circular economy (CE) aims at the elimination of both waste and misuse of resources. This system focuses on reusing, repairing, and recycling in a secure method. Thereby, researchers can ultimately reduce input materials and prolong the time of usage (instead of only six months on average) of equipment and supplies, minimizing pollution and the intorduction of other wastes into the environment. Morseletto et al. ^[60] have defined a circular economy as “an economic model directed at the efficient use of resources through waste minimization, long-term value retention, and resource minimization primary and closed-loop of products, product parts, and materials within the boundaries of environmental protection and socio-economic benefits.” According to the above definition, a CE-based production and consumption system focuses on maintaining the utility and the value of products and materials.

To this end, the Ellen MacArthur Foundation ^[61] has introduced a series of principles (e.g., reuse, repair, refurbish, remanufacture, recover, recycle, and regenerate from waste streams). The primary purpose of the CE system is to achieve a world without waste.

Moreover, CE is considered a model of the future toward a green economy. For example, to reduce waste and increase recycling, Amazon has created CE loops based on partnerships and offers options for customers to reuse, repair, and recycle their products ^[62]. However, to be able to apply CE in the natural environment is exceptionally challenging ^[63], especially in a medical setting. A typical example drawn from the COVID-19 pandemic is that the waste treatment process is performed asynchronously, leading to a considerable amount of waste (e.g., personal protective equipment ^[64] and COVID-19 vaccines ^[65]). This also contributed to many subsequent waves of infection ^[66].

The management and classification system of medical equipment and supplies acts as a decentralized trading environment in the current context. The system consists of participants who share and authenticate data, and are solely responsible for the shared data. These data can be inventory data, digital assets, types of equipment, supplies, or any other kind of information ^[67] used in a healthcare environment. Understanding the demand for medical equipment and supplies is extremely important; it contributes to reducing the spread of COVID-19 disease in the community ^[68]. Blockchain-based management systems were introduced to address this problem. The next section focuses on exploiting waste management systems and medical supplies developed based on Blockchain technology.

Gupta et al. ^[13] proposed an Ethereum-based system called Electronic Waste Management (EWM). Based on the constraints defined in the smart contract, EWM has ensured compliance with waste disposal guidelines for electrical and electronic equipment (EEE). In EWM, the author proposed three main stakeholders offered by the system: manufacturers, consumers, and retailers of electronic components. Smart contracts calculate, record, report, and provide incentives for consumers to send back EEE waste to retailers to address the post-use waste problem. Furthermore, in the context of retailers, smart contracts focus on verifying that waste is received for all sold EEEs. Specifically, the retailer ships the EEE waste to the producer and pays a portion of the original cost of the EEE to the consumer. Smart contracts have also imposed penalties on EEE manufacturers if waste is not collected from retailers within a predetermined period.

Poongodi et al. ^[14] have proposed a 5G enabled system that supports tracking electronic products throughout their life cycle, based on blockchain technology. The system is deployed on the Ethereum platform. The system was built around five actors: manufacturer, supplier, retailer, customer, and e-waste facility. In particular, e-waste facilities offered rewards and incentives to customers if they sorted waste for treatment before sending it to e-waste treatment facilities. To accomplish this, the authors built a smart contract-based computation suite. Specifically, it required all related parties to comply with the rules outlined in the treatment of waste by escrow. This action encouraged stakeholders to take responsibility for e-waste segregation practices. Finally, the escrow and incentives were returned to the stakeholders when the smart contract logic-based calculations were evaluated.

Laura et al. ^[15] introduced an Ethereum-based management system to assist users in monitoring solid material waste (e.g., computers and smartphones). What differentiates this system from previous approaches is that it allows the owner to monitor and track the waste in transit from the receiving location (i.e., user address) to the substance-storage waste plant. The proposed system was based on the interaction between four actors: the collection manager, storage manager, transaction manager, and processing manager. The collection manager generated and stored a QR code (i.e., a QR code referring to a package containing solid waste on the blockchain). The transportation manager recorded the solid-waste-transport vehicle’s status, location, and route information. This information was updated to the distributed ledger. In addition, to temporarily store encrypted data related to solid waste without affecting the entire system’s performance, the authors used an off-chain storage system. However, to balance security and throughput, the system can use multiple blockchain platforms. Thereby, the problem, in this case, is how to synchronize between different blockchains.

Schmelz et al. ^[69] also presented an Ethereum-based system that could track waste across borders in a secure, tamper-proof, and privacy-preserving manner. In particular, sensitive and non-disclosure information (e.g., assets and waste processes) were stored locally and not on-chain. The system kept a log of the processes executed during the processing of audit-critical data. Specifically, it assigned a signature to the data before the transaction by applying a one-way hash function. On the other hand, the authorities examined and verified the reason for the delay in transportation access between the exchanged locations, the volume transported, and the validity of the waste treatment methods based on the information stored in the smart contract. However, they did not impose any penalty for violations in the transportation and disposal of waste.

The lack of transparency in waste collection and treatment activities could cause frauds that affect the entire system. To address this issue, Ahmad et al. ^[1] proposed a framework for traceability of personal protective equipment (PPE) for healthcare workers against COVID-19. In particular, based on image analysis related to waste collection, the authors presented a system that used analytical techniques to identify fraud. They compared data before and after the collection/treatment processes to identify fraudulent practices, i.e., calculated similarity index between two captured images, estimated garbage weight, location position, and time difference of two captured images. After computing such data, it determined what behavior was (not) allowed in garbage collection. Correct actions would be encouraged; otherwise, violators would be fined. However, blockchain’s contribution to the system is somewhat ambiguous. Specifically, the technique used blockchain technology to securely transfer crypto-currencies to users as an incentive to collect waste. Moreover, another study conducted by Dasaklis et al. ^[16] proposed a blockchain-based system to track all remanufacturing/refurbishing processes for smartphones. However, the authors did not pay much attention to the reproduction/refurbishment process in either of the above approaches.

References

Ahmad, R.W.; Salah, K.; Jayaraman, R.; Yaqoob, I.; Omar, M.; Ellahham, S. Blockchain-based forward supply chain and waste management for COVID-19 medical equipment and supplies. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 44905–44927.
Zand, A.D.; Heir, A.V. Emanating challenges in urban and healthcare waste management in Isfahan, Iran after the outbreak of COVID-19. Environ. Technol. 2021, 42, 329–336.
Klemeš, J.J.; Jiang, P.; Van Fan, Y.; Bokhari, A.; Wang, X.C. COVID-19 pandemics Stage II–energy and environmental impacts of vaccination. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 150, 111400.
Van Fan, Y.; Jiang, P.; Hemzal, M.; Klemeš, J.J. An update of COVID-19 influence on waste management. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 754, 142014.
Jiang, P.; Klemeš, J.J.; Fan, Y.V.; Fu, X.; Bee, Y.M. More is not enough: A deeper understanding of the COVID-19 impacts on healthcare, energy and environment is crucial. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 684.
Steenmans, K.; Taylor, P.; Steenmans, I. Blockchain Technology for Governance of Plastic Waste Management: Where Are We? Soc. Sci. 2021, 10, 434.
Thanh, L.N.T.; Phien, N.N.; Vo, H.K.; Luong, H.H.; Anh, T.D.; Tuan, K.N.H.; Son, H.X. UIP2SOP: A unique IoT network applying single sign-on and message queue protocol. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2021, 12, 19–30.
Luong, H.H.; Anh, T.D.; Tuan, K.N.H.; Son, H.X. IoHT-MBA: An Internet of Healthcare Things (IoHT) Platform based on Microservice and Brokerless Architecture. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2021, 12, 591–601.
Nguyen, T.T.L.; Vo, H.K.; Luong, H.H.; Nguyen, H.T.K.; Dao, A.T.; Ha, X.S. Toward a unique IoT network via single sign-on protocol and message queue. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management, Elk, Poland, 24–26 September 2021; pp. 270–284.
Thanh, L.N.T.; Vo, H.K.; Luong, H.H.; Tuan, K.N.H.; Dao, A.T.; Son, H.X. Toward a Security IoT Platform with High Rate Transmission and Low Energy Consumption. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, Cagliari, Italy, 13–16 September 2021; pp. 647–662.
Lam, N.T.T.; Son, H.X.; Le, T.H.; Nguyen, T.A.; Vo, H.K.; Luong, H.H.; Anh, T.D.; Tuan, K.N.H.; Nguyen, H.V.K. BMDD: A novel approach for IoT platform (Broker-less and Microservice architecture, Decentralized identity, and Dynamic transmission messages). Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2022, 8, e950.
Thanh, L.N.T.; Phien, N.N.; Vo, H.K.; Luong, H.H.; Anh, T.D.; Tuan, K.N.H.; Son, H.X. SIP-MBA: A secure IoT platform with brokerless and micro-service architecture. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2021, 12, 586–593.
Gupta, N.; Bedi, P. E-waste management using blockchain based smart contracts. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), Bangalore, India, 19–22 September 2018; pp. 915–921.
Poongodi, M.; Hamdi, M.; Vijayakumar, V.; Rawal, B.S.; Maode, M. An effective electronic waste management solution based on blockchain smart contract in 5G communities. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 3rd 5G World Forum (5GWF), Bangalore, India, 10–12 September 2020; pp. 1–6.
Laouar, M.R.; Hamad, Z.T.; Eom, S. Towards blockchain-based urban planning: Application for waste collection management. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, Cairo, Egypt, 24–26 March 2019; pp. 1–6.
Dasaklis, T.K.; Casino, F.; Patsakis, C. A traceability and auditing framework for electronic equipment reverse logistics based on blockchain: The case of mobile phones. In Proceedings of the 2020 11th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA), Piraeus, Greece, 15–17 July 2020; pp. 1–7.
Le, H.T.; Thanh, L.N.T.; Vo, H.K.; Luong, H.H.; Tuan, K.N.H.; Anh, T.D.; Vuong, K.H.N.; Son, H.X. Patient-Chain: Patient-centered Healthcare System a Blockchain-based Technology in Dealing with Emergencies. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing: Applications and Technologies, London, UK, 30–31 July 2022; pp. 576–583.
Vujičić, D.; Jagodić, D.; Ranđić, S. Blockchain technology, bitcoin, and Ethereum: A brief overview. In Proceedings of the 2018 17th International Symposium Infoteh-Jahorina (Infoteh), East Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 21–23 March 2018; pp. 1–6.
Duong-Trung, N.; Ha, X.S.; Phan, T.T.; Trieu, P.N.; Nguyen, Q.N.; Pham, D.; Huynh, T.T.; Le, H.T. Multi-sessions mechanism for decentralized cash on delivery system. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2019, 10, 553–560.
Nakamoto, S. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Bitcoin.org. Disponible. 2009. Available online: https://bitcoin.org/en/bitcoin-paper (accessed on 25 November 2021).
Uddin, M.A.; Stranieri, A.; Gondal, I.; Balasubramanian, V. A survey on the adoption of blockchain in iot: Challenges and solutions. Blockchain Res. Appl. 2021, 2, 100006.
Alharby, M.; Van Moorsel, A. Blockchain-based smart contracts: A systematic mapping study. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1710.06372.
Androulaki, E.; Barger, A.; Bortnikov, V.; Cachin, C.; Christidis, K.; De Caro, A.; Enyeart, D.; Ferris, C.; Laventman, G.; Manevich, Y. Hyperledger fabric: A distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth EuroSys Conference, Porto, Portugal, 23–26 April 2018; pp. 1–15.
Shi, S.; He, D.; Li, L.; Kumar, N.; Khan, M.K.; Choo, K.K.R. Applications of blockchain in ensuring the security and privacy of electronic health record systems: A survey. Comput. Secur. 2020, 97, 101966.
Casino, F.; Dasaklis, T.K.; Patsakis, C. A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: Current status, classification and open issues. Telemat. Inform. 2019, 36, 55–81.
Monrat, A.A.; Schelén, O.; Andersson, K. A survey of blockchain from the perspectives of applications, challenges, and opportunities. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 117134–117151.
Alketbi, A.; Nasir, Q.; Talib, M.A. Blockchain for government services—Use cases, security benefits and challenges. In Proceedings of the 2018 15th Learning and Technology Conference (L&T), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 25–26 February 2018; pp. 112–119.
Jaradat, A.; Ali, O.; AlAhmad, A. Blockchain Technology: A Fundamental Overview. In Blockchain Technologies for Sustainability; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 1–24.
Mamun, Q. Blockchain technology in the future of healthcare. Smart Health 2022, 23, 100223.
Zheng, Z.; Xie, S.; Dai, H.N.; Chen, W.; Chen, X.; Weng, J.; Imran, M. An overview on smart contracts: Challenges, advances and platforms. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2020, 105, 475–491.
Díaz-Santiso, J.; Fraga-Lamas, P. E-Voting System Using Hyperledger Fabric Blockchain and Smart Contracts. Eng. Proc. 2021, 7, 11.
Crosby, M.; Nachiappan; Pattanayak, P.; Verma, S.; Kalyanaraman, V. Blockchain technology: Beyond bitcoin. Appl. Innov. 2016, 2, 71.
Son, H.X.; Nguyen, M.H.; Phien, N.N.; Le, H.T.; Nguyen, Q.N.; Dinh, V.; Tru, P.; Nguyen, P. Towards a mechanism for protecting seller’s interest of cash on delivery by using smart contract in hyperledger. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2019, 10, 45–50.
Kim, D. An integrated supply chain management system: A case study in healthcare sector. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Commerce and Web Technologies, Copenhagen, Denmark, 23–26 August 2005; pp. 218–227.
Shahbaz, M.S.; Raja Zuraidah, R.M.; Bin, M.F.; Rehman, F. What is supply chain risk management? A review. Adv. Sci. Lett. 2017, 23, 9233–9238.
Lavastre, O.; Gunasekaran, A.; Spalanzani, A. Effect of firm characteristics, supplier relationships and techniques used on supply chain risk management (SCRM): An empirical investigation on French industrial firms. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2014, 52, 3381–3403.
Douladiris, K.; Dasaklis, T.; Casino, F.; Douligeris, C. A Blockchain framework for reverse logistics of used medical equipment. In Proceedings of the 24th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics, Athens, Greece, 20–22 November 2020; pp. 148–151.
Subramanian, N.; Chaudhuri, A.; Kayıkcı, Y. Blockchain Applications in Reverse Logistics. In Blockchain and Supply Chain Logistics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 67–81.
Farouk, M.; Darwish, S.M. Reverse logistics solution in e-supply chain management by blockchain technology. Egypt. Comput. Sci. J. 2020, 44, 22–34.
Le, N.T.T.; Nguyen, Q.N.; Phien, N.N.; Duong-Trung, N.; Huynh, T.T.; Nguyen, T.P.; Son, H.X. Assuring Non-fraudulent Transactions in Cash on Delivery by Introducing Double Smart Contracts. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2019, 10, 677–684.
Le, H.T.; Le, N.T.T.; Phien, N.N.; Duong-Trung, N. Introducing multi shippers mechanism for decentralized cash on delivery system. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2019, 10, 590–597.
Ha, X.S.; Le, H.T.; Metoui, N.; Duong-Trung, N. Dem-cod: Novel access-control-based cash on delivery mechanism for decentralized marketplace. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 19th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom), Guangzhou, China, 10–13 November 2020; pp. 71–78.
Ha, X.S.; Le, T.H.; Phan, T.T.; Nguyen, H.H.D.; Vo, H.K.; Duong-Trung, N. Scrutinizing trust and transparency in cash on delivery systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Security, Privacy and Anonymity in Computation, Communication and Storage, Nanjing, China, 18–20 December 2020; pp. 214–227.
Kumar, T.; Ramani, V.; Ahmad, I.; Braeken, A.; Harjula, E.; Ylianttila, M. Blockchain utilization in healthcare: Key requirements and challenges. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 20th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom), Ostrava, Czech Republic, 17–20 September 2018; pp. 1–7.
De Oliveira, M.T.; Reis, L.H.; Carrano, R.C.; Seixas, F.L.; Saade, D.C.; Albuquerque, C.V.; Fernandes, N.C.; Olabarriaga, S.D.; Medeiros, D.S.; Mattos, D.M. Towards a blockchain-based secure electronic medical record for healthcare applications. In Proceedings of the ICC 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Shanghai, China, 20–24 May 2019; pp. 1–6.
Wilber, K.; Vayansky, S.; Costello, N.; Berdik, D.; Jararweh, Y. A Survey on Blockchain for Healthcare Informatics and Applications. In Proceedings of the 2020 7th International Conference on Internet of Things: Systems, Management and Security (IOTSMS), Paris, France, 14–16 December 2020; pp. 1–9.
Shynu, P.; Menon, V.G.; Kumar, R.L.; Kadry, S.; Nam, Y. Blockchain-based secure healthcare application for diabetic-cardio disease prediction in fog computing. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 45706–45720.
Torky, M.; Hassanien, A.E. COVID-19 blockchain framework: Innovative approach. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2004.06081.
Hölbl, M.; Kompara, M.; Kamišalić, A.; Nemec Zlatolas, L. A systematic review of the use of blockchain in healthcare. Symmetry 2018, 10, 470.
FarmaTrust Report 2022. Available online: https://farmatrust.com (accessed on 17 May 2022).
Organ Tree 2022. Available online: https://organ-tree.com (accessed on 17 May 2022).
Yaga, D.; Mell, P.; Roby, N.; Scarfone, K. Blockchain technology overview. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1906.11078.
Wüst, K.; Gervais, A. Do you need a blockchain? In Proceedings of the 2018 Crypto Valley Conference on Blockchain Technology (CVCBT), Zug, Switzerland, 20–22 June 2018; pp. 45–54.
Quynh, N.T.T.; Son, H.X.; Le, T.H.; Huy, H.N.D.; Vo, K.H.; Luong, H.H.; Tuan, K.N.H.; Anh, T.D.; Duong-Trung, N. Toward a Design of Blood Donation Management by Blockchain Technologies. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, Cagliari, Italy, 13–16 September 2021; pp. 78–90.
Son, H.X.; Le, T.H.; Quynh, N.T.T.; Huy, H.N.D.; Duong-Trung, N.; Luong, H.H. Toward a Blockchain-Based Technology in Dealing with Emergencies in Patient-Centered Healthcare Systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile, Secure, and Programmable Networking, Paris, France, 28–29 October 2020; pp. 44–56.
Duong-Trung, N.; Son, H.X.; Le, H.T.; Phan, T.T. On Components of a Patient-Centered Healthcare System Using Smart Contract. In Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Conference on Cryptography, Security and Privacy, Nanjing, China, 10–12 January 2020; pp. 31–35.
Duong-Trung, N.; Son, H.X.; Le, H.T.; Phan, T.T. Smart Care: Integrating Blockchain Technology into the Design of Patient-Centered Healthcare Systems. In Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Conference on Cryptography, Security and Privacy, ICCSP, Nanjing, China, 10–12 January 2020; pp. 105–109.
Jiang, P.; Fu, X.; Van Fan, Y.; Klemeš, J.J.; Chen, P.; Ma, S.; Zhang, W. Spatial-temporal potential exposure risk analytics and urban sustainability impacts related to COVID-19 mitigation: A perspective from car mobility behaviour. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 279, 123673.
Leonard, A. The Story of Stuff: How Our Obsession with Stuff Is Trashing the Planet, Our Communities, and Our Health-and a Vision for Change; Simon and Schuster: New York, NY, USA, 2010.
Morseletto, P. Targets for a circular economy. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 153, 104553.
The Circular Economy in Detail. Available online: https://archive.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/explore/the-circular-economy-in-detail (accessed on 30 March 2022).
How Amazon is Investing in a Circular Economy. Available online: https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/sustainability/how-amazon-is-investing-in-a-circular-economy (accessed on 30 March 2022).
Korhonen, J.; Honkasalo, A.; Seppälä, J. Circular economy: The concept and its limitations. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 143, 37–46.
Sheehan, J.R.; Lyons, B.; Holt, F. The use of Lean Methodology to reduce personal protective equipment wastage in children undergoing congenital cardiac surgery, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Pediatr. Anesth. 2021, 31, 213–220.
The Circular Economy in Detail. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/hcp/wastage-operational-summary.html#vaccine-wastage-best-practices (accessed on 30 March 2022).
Manninen, K.; Koskela, S.; Antikainen, R.; Bocken, N.; Dahlbo, H.; Aminoff, A. Do circular economy business models capture intended environmental value propositions? J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 171, 413–422.
Nandi, S.; Sarkis, J.; Hervani, A.A.; Helms, M.M. Redesigning supply chains using blockchain-enabled circular economy and COVID-19 experiences. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 27, 10–22.
Govindan, K.; Mina, H.; Alavi, B. A decision support system for demand management in healthcare supply chains considering the epidemic outbreaks: A case study of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2020, 138, 101967.
Schmelz, D.; Pinter, K.; Strobl, S.; Zhu, L.; Niemeier, P.; Grechenig, T. Technical mechanics of a trans-border waste flow tracking solution based on blockchain technology. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 35th International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW), Macao, 8–12 April 2019; pp. 31–36.

© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Upload a video for this entry

Information

Subjects: Computer Science, Information Systems

Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :

Hai Trieu Le

The Anh Nguyen

Loc Van Cao Phu

Duy Nguyen Truong Quoc

Tran Huyen Nguyen

Ha Xuan Son

Nghia Duong-Trung

View Times: 914

Update Date: 28 Jul 2022

Table of Contents

Video Upload Options

Confirm