Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 1233 2022-06-24 16:49:03 |
2 layout Meta information modification 1233 2022-06-27 02:38:42 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Hyldelund, N.B.;  Dalgaard, V.L.;  Byrne, D.V.;  Andersen, B.V. Acute Psychosocial Stress Effects on Food Consumption. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/24457 (accessed on 16 November 2024).
Hyldelund NB,  Dalgaard VL,  Byrne DV,  Andersen BV. Acute Psychosocial Stress Effects on Food Consumption. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/24457. Accessed November 16, 2024.
Hyldelund, Nikoline Bach, Vita Ligaya Dalgaard, Derek Victor Byrne, Barbara Vad Andersen. "Acute Psychosocial Stress Effects on Food Consumption" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/24457 (accessed November 16, 2024).
Hyldelund, N.B.,  Dalgaard, V.L.,  Byrne, D.V., & Andersen, B.V. (2022, June 24). Acute Psychosocial Stress Effects on Food Consumption. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/24457
Hyldelund, Nikoline Bach, et al. "Acute Psychosocial Stress Effects on Food Consumption." Encyclopedia. Web. 24 June, 2022.
Acute Psychosocial Stress Effects on Food Consumption
Edit

The most central physiological stress response is the activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, which begins with the release of corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF) from the hypothalamus. The physiological stress response can be dampened by eating, as the secretion of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) is reduced following consumption of food and the activation of the HPA axis is thereby attenuated.

food pleasure food reward stress sensory science appetite eating diet pleasure scale

1. Introduction

The German sociologist Hartmut Rosa has described the paradox of how modern work life has been organized [1]. On one hand, modern work life seeks to accommodate higher levels of individual freedom, and on the other hand, it has been associated with increased levels of perceived stress, and health issues are registered as a result of working under these conditions [1][2][3][4]. Rosa describes this paradox as a result of a phenomenon that he has termed ‘social acceleration’ [1][2]. Social acceleration is a theoretical expression of how the pace of all parts of life constantly speed up, leaving people with a feeling of not being able to keep pace, feeling insufficient, and as a result, some may experience increased stress or burnout. Prolonged exposure to stressful conditions has been linked to a long and varied list of clinically defined diseases. These links are mediated by both the neuroendocrine systems, alterations of health behavior and affective regulation, which potentially can result in diseases such as depression, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, infectious diseases and neurodegenerative diseases [5][6][7][8][9].

2. Physiological Mechanisms of the Endocrine System Affected by Stress

The most central physiological stress response is the activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, which begins with the release of corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF) from the hypothalamus [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. CRF stimulates the release of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) from the anterior pituitary gland. ACTH then circulates through the bloodstream to the adrenal cortex, where it stimulates secretion of glucocorticoids, such as cortisol. Glucocorticoids (GC) can promote eating and weight gain in two ways. First, GC in rodent models has been shown to stimulate eating, especially highly palatable foods, on its own [14][18]. Secondly, GC stimulates insulin secretion, and the two hormones can then further act synergistically to promote food intake and visceral fat accumulation, as GCs functions to increase general food-associated drives, while insulin influences preferences for which specific types of food are consumed [14][16][19]. Additionally, cortisol will bind to GC receptors and thereby activate lipoprotein lipase, which may increase triglyceride accumulation in fat tissue, especially in the abdominal region. In the presence of insulin, cortisol will also concurrently inhibit the lipid-mobilizing system, which can also result in further fat accumulation. The HPA axis is thus not only the manager of the stress response but is also highly intertwined with the endocrine regulation of appetite, as the hypothalamus is a critical region for regulation of both food intake and energy balance and the stress circuit [10][11][14][16][20]. Furthermore, stress also activates the autonomic nervous system (ANS), which may result in heightened sympathetic-nervous-system activity and subsequent release of adrenaline and norepinephrine. It is especially these hormones that activate the allostatic stress response, and in synergy with the glucocorticoids starts a series of adaptive processes that can alter the structure and function of a variety of cells and tissues [8][21]. Furthermore, ongoing high levels of experienced stress can also result in overactivity of the sympathetic nervous system, which is related to insulin resistance [16]. The ANS may therefore in part be responsible for the higher prevalence of cardiovascular diseases, metabolic diseases and changes of the immune system that are seen among patients suffering from stress [8][9][21][22].

3. Stress-Induced Eating

There are two different, yet interacting, pathways of the physiological response to acute stress that can affect food intake. The first is the activation of the HPA axis, with subsequent stimulation of the secretion of glucocorticoids (including cortisol) as described above. The other pathway is that of the sympathetic nervous system, which leads to increases in arousal parameters such as secretion of adrenalin, elevated blood pressure and a diversion of blood flow from the gastrointestinal tract towards the skeletal muscles and brain [16][20]. This reaction is also known as the ‘fight-or-flight’ response and will most often lead to a decrease rather than an increase in food consumption. Nevertheless, research has shown that if the stressor is perceived as ego-threatening, i.e., as a threat to self-esteem or understanding of social self, cortisol will be released, and thereby stimulation of appetite and food intake will follow [20][23].
Multiple studies have shown that being stressed, both by acute stressful events as well as during longer periods due to interpersonal and work-related daily hassles, can cause non-homeostatic hunger, as food intake can dampen the physiological and behavioral stress responses [12][14][19][24]. The physiological stress response can be dampened by eating, as the secretion of ACTH is reduced following consumption of food and the activation of the HPA axis is thereby attenuated [16][18][19]. The relationship between stress and food intake can therefore be characterized as bidirectional, as stress and negative effects can alter eating behavior by increasing intake of especially highly palatable foods via activation of the HPA axis. Conversely, food consumption can alter mood by attenuating the stress response via the endocrine system and hedonic effects of the food. In particular, the hedonic experience of eating has been proposed to serve a special role in the effect of stress-induced eating, as eating can activate neural substrates, such as dopamine, similarly to drug abuse [5][16][20][25][26]. Dopamine is a neurotransmitter that codes for pleasure and enhances the desire for food, while it also functions to deactivate the HPA axis activity [16][27][28]. The pleasure one experiences from food may therefore be one of the main reasons for the comforting effect of food when feeling stressed. Thereby, eating as a means to dampen the physiological and behavioral stress response, the reward pathways are concurrently stimulated, which can potentially lead to neurobiological adaptations that promote the compulsive nature of overeating in a way that resembles drug abuse [20]. GCs are furthermore involved in the regulation of memory, specifically, those memories that are consolidated of emotionally arousing experiences, such as stress [18][19][29]. Thus, as stress promotes secretion of GCs, which may lead to intake of highly palatable foods, the GCs at the same time can facilitate an association between the indulgence of these ‘comforting’ foods and a subsequent positive effect on stress and mood [14][16][20][30].

4. Food Reward and Its Subcomponents

In addiction research, there is a sharp distinction between ‘liking’ and ‘wanting’ as two key components in food reward [25][26][31]. Liking, or consummatory pleasure, is linked to the hedonic reaction to a food, and can be detected by behavioral or neural signals in hedonic hotspots in the brain. Wanting, or incentive salience, on the other hand, relates to the motivation for a reward, typically triggered by a reward-related cue [25][26][32]. ‘Wanting’ is generated by large dopamine-related mesolimbic brain systems, and will ordinarily occur together with ‘liking’ and learning. However, as the ‘liking’ and ‘wanting’ systems are separate from each other, both mechanisms can also occur independently from the other [25][26][33][34][35]. A well-known mechanism from drug addiction is the case of experiencing compulsive levels of ‘wanting’ without ‘liking’, as a consequence of sensitization of the reward pathway [19][25][35]. It is hypothesized that this mechanism is what may be predominant in the case of food addiction also [26][27][33][34][36]. The link between the stress response, stress-related eating and behavioral changes thus seems to be closely related to the reward pathway, as well as changes in the mesolimbic system due to increased dopamine secretion or dopamine sensitization [16][26][35][37][38].

References

  1. Rosa, H. Fremmedgørelse og Acceleration, 1st ed.; Heinskou, M.B., Ed.; Hans Reitzel: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2014; ISBN 9788741257716.
  2. Brinkmann, S. Stress i arbejdslivet: Konstitueringen af en epidemi. In Nye Perspektiver på Stress; Andersen, M.F., Brinkmann, S., Eds.; Klim: Aarhus, Denmark, 2013; pp. 75–92. ISBN 9788771291674.
  3. Becker, D. One Nation under Stress: Social Uses of the Stress Concept; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2013; ISBN 9780199742912.
  4. Kompier, M.A.J. New systems of work organization and workers’ health. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2006, 32, 421–430.
  5. Epel, E.S.; Crosswell, A.D.; Mayer, S.E.; Prather, A.A.; Slavich, G.M.; Puterman, E.; Mendes, W.B. More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2018, 49, 146–169.
  6. Cohen, S.; Doyle, W.J.; Alper, C.M.; Janicki-Deverts, D.; Turner, R.B. Sleep habits and susceptibility to the common cold. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009, 169, 62–67.
  7. Cohen, S.; Gianaros, P.J.; Manuck, S.B. A stage model of stress and disease. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2016, 11, 456–463.
  8. McEwen, B.S. Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 338, 171–179.
  9. Lupien, S.J.; McEwen, B.S.; Gunnar, M.R.; Heim, C. Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 10, 434–445.
  10. Finch, L.E.; Cummings, J.R.; Tomiyama, A.J. Cookie or clementine? Psychophysiological stress reactivity and recovery after eating healthy and unhealthy comfort foods. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2019, 107, 26–36.
  11. Dallman, M.F.; Pecoraro, N.; Akana, S.F.; La Fleur, S.E.; Gomez, F.; Houshyar, H.; Bell, M.E.; Bhatnagar, S.; Laugero, K.D.; Manalo, S. Chronic Stress and Obesity: A new view of “comfort food”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 11696–11701.
  12. Masih, T.; Dimmock, J.A.; Epel, E.S.; Guelfi, K.J. Stress-induced eating and the relaxation response as a potential antidote: A review and hypothesis. Appetite 2017, 118, 136–143.
  13. Finch, L.E.; Tomiyama, A.J. Comfort eating, psychological stress, and depressive symptoms in young adult women. Appetite 2015, 95, 239–244.
  14. Tomiyama, A.J. Stress and obesity. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2019, 70, 703–718.
  15. Herhaus, B.; Päßler, S.; Petrowski, K. Stress-related laboratory eating behavior in adults with obesity and healthy weight. Physiol. Behav. 2018, 196, 150–157.
  16. Sinha, R.; Jastreboff, A.M. Stress as a common risk factor for obesity and addiction. Biol. Psychiatry 2013, 73, 827–835.
  17. Picard, M.; McEwen, B.S.; Epel, E.S.; Sandi, C. An energetic view of stress: Focus on mitochondria. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2018, 49, 72–85.
  18. Tomiyama, A.J.; Finch, L.E.; Cummings, J.R. Did that brownie do its job? Stress, eating, and the biobehavioral effects of comfort food. Emerg. Trends Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 1, 1–15.
  19. Finch, L.E.; Tomiyama, A.J. Stress-induced eating dampens physiological and behavioral stress responses. In Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Abdominal Obesity; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 189–195. ISBN 9780124078697.
  20. Adam, T.C.; Epel, E.S. Stress, eating and the reward system. Physiol. Behav. 2007, 91, 449–458.
  21. Cohen, S.; Murphy, M.L.M.; Prather, A.A. Ten surprising facts about stressful life events and disease risk. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2019, 70, 577–597.
  22. Gunnar, M.R. Social buffering of stress in development: A career perspective. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2017, 12, 355–373.
  23. Dickerson, S.S.; Gruenewald, T.L.; Kemeny, M.E. When the social self is threatened: Shame, physiology, and health. J. Pers. 2004, 72, 1191–1216.
  24. Wallis, D.J.; Hetherington, M.M. Emotions and eating. Self-reported and experimentally induced changes in food intake under stress. Appetite 2009, 52, 355–362.
  25. Finlayson, G.; King, N.; Blundell, J.E. Liking vs. wanting food: Importance for human appetite control and weight regulation. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2007, 31, 987–1002.
  26. Berridge, K.C.; Kringelbach, M.L. Pleasure systems in the brain. Neuron 2015, 86, 646–664.
  27. Berridge, K.C. Food reward: Brain substrates of wanting and liking. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 1996, 20, 1–25.
  28. Berridge, K.C.; Robinson, T.E. What is the role of dopamine in reward: Hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Res. Rev. 1998, 28, 309–369.
  29. Pool, E.; Sennwald, V.; Delplanque, S.; Brosch, T.; Sander, D. Measuring wanting and liking from animals to humans: A systematic review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2016, 63, 124–142.
  30. Pool, E.; Delplanque, S.; Coppin, G.; Sander, D. Is comfort food really comforting? Mechanisms underlying stress-induced eating. Food Res. Int. 2015, 76, 207–215.
  31. Dalton, M.; Finlayson, G. Hedonics, satiation and satiety. In Satiation, Satiety and the Control of Food Intake; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 221–237.
  32. Kringelbach, M.L.; Stein, A.; van Hartevelt, T.J. The functional human neuroanatomy of food pleasure cycles. Physiol. Behav. 2012, 106, 307–316.
  33. Finlayson, G.; King, N.; Blundell, J. The role of implicit wanting in relation to explicit liking and wanting for food: Implications for appetite control. Appetite 2008, 50, 120–127.
  34. Havermans, R.C. “You say it’s liking, i say it’s wanting …”. On the difficulty of disentangling food reward in man. Appetite 2011, 57, 286–294.
  35. Berridge, K.C.; Ho, C.-Y.; Richard, J.M.; DiFeliceantonio, A.G. The tempted brain eats: Pleasure and Desire circuits in obesity and eating disorders. Brain Res. 2010, 1350, 43–64.
  36. Berridge, K.C. ‘Liking’ and ‘wanting’ food rewards: Brain substrates and roles in eating disorders. Physiol. Behav. 2009, 97, 537–550.
  37. Morris, M.J.; Beilharz, J.E.; Maniam, J.; Reichelt, A.C.; Westbrook, R.F. Why is obesity such a problem in the 21st century? The intersection of palatable food, cues and reward pathways, stress, and cognition. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2015, 58, 36–45.
  38. Thomsen, K.R.; Whybrow, P.C.; Kringelbach, M.L. Reconceptualizing anhedonia: Novel perspectives on balancing the pleasure networks in the human brain. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 49.
More
Information
Subjects: Physiology
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : , , ,
View Times: 486
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 27 Jun 2022
1000/1000
ScholarVision Creations