Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 1133 2022-06-21 16:16:17 |
2 format -3 word(s) 1130 2022-06-22 03:29:18 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Farivar, S.;  Golmohammadi, A.;  Ramirez, A. Development of Analytics Capability in Supply Chain Organizations. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/24290 (accessed on 07 October 2024).
Farivar S,  Golmohammadi A,  Ramirez A. Development of Analytics Capability in Supply Chain Organizations. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/24290. Accessed October 07, 2024.
Farivar, Samira, Amirmohsen Golmohammadi, Alejandro Ramirez. "Development of Analytics Capability in Supply Chain Organizations" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/24290 (accessed October 07, 2024).
Farivar, S.,  Golmohammadi, A., & Ramirez, A. (2022, June 21). Development of Analytics Capability in Supply Chain Organizations. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/24290
Farivar, Samira, et al. "Development of Analytics Capability in Supply Chain Organizations." Encyclopedia. Web. 21 June, 2022.
Development of Analytics Capability in Supply Chain Organizations
Edit

Developing analytics capability has become one of the main priorities in organizations today. Despite the increasing use of analytics, the necessary conditions to obtain the expected benefits from such investment still need to be examined. Supply chain process integration enhances firms’ analytics capability. Analytics capability alone is not sufficient in improving firm performance; it must be complemented with employees’ analytics skills. 

analytics capability supply chain process integration firm performance employees’ analytics skills

1. Introduction

Recently, data analytics has gained significant attention from both practitioners and academics. Many firms have attempted to incorporate analytics in order to improve their performance. According to reports, analytics is among the top priorities in organizations’ agendas [1]. One of the areas that deploying analytics would have great impacts on is supply chain management [2]. According to a survey conducted by Accenture, more than one-third of surveyed organizations reported that they were starting to integrate data analytics in their supply chain management [3]. Despite the promising benefits of analytics for organizations, reports and studies show that many organizations still do not receive their expected outcomes from using analytics (e.g., [4][5][6][7][8]). A reason for this unsuccessful employment is that many organizations are not still completely familiar with the necessary conditions for utilizing data analytics effectively [9]. Existing evidence of the use of supply chain analytics is mostly anecdotal [10][11][12][13] or comprises cases and applications that are specific [14][15][16]. Hence, the use of analytics in supply chain management and the role of supply chain elements are still largely unknown.
To better understand the integration of analytics and supply chain elements, relying on organizational information processing theory (OIPT) [17][18][19][20], researchers examine the role of supply chain process integration and employees’ analytics skills in improving analytics-based performance. Using OIPT, researchers examine the effects of lateral relations and vertical information systems on increasing the information processing capacity [19], which leads to enhancing the organization’s performance. The current literature has mostly explored the technological aspects of analytics; hence, analytics capability has mainly been conceptualized as the ability to utilize tools and technology for processing data and gathering relevant insights [21][22][23]. Following the study by Srinivasan and Swink [20], researchers use an expanded definition for analytics capability which includes “organization and process elements of analytics capability, positing that, from an organizational information processing theory perspective, processing large volumes and varieties of data is both a challenge and an opportunity” ([20], p. 1850).

2. Organizational Information Processing Theory (OIPT)

As an essential resource, information should be utilized effectively by firms, especially in uncertain environments [17][18]. According to OIPT, in uncertain situations, organizations may follow two strategies: develop mechanistic organizational processes to reduce their needs for information; or enhance their information processing capacity [17][18]. Galbraith [18] suggests that firms may reduce their information processing needs by developing slack resources and/or developing self-contained tasks; however, these actions require great investments, and they do not enhance the firms’ responsiveness [20].
The alternative strategy is to increase the information processing capacity, which can occur by investing in lateral relations and vertical information systems [24]. Lateral relations can include firms’ processes and relationships that are associated with external sources (suppliers and customers) and the internal integration of functions within the firm. For instance, firms that engage in supply chain integration increase their information processing capacity through enhancing their lateral relations [24]. The other way to increase the information processing capacity is by employing vertical information systems, which refer to mechanisms that enable firms to process information efficiently during task performance [17][24].

3. Supply Chain Integration

Supply chain process integration is defined as “the degree to which a focal firm has integrated the flow of information, material, and finances with its supply chain partners” ([25], p. 230). According to the current literature, supply chain process integration consists of three parts: integrating information flow, physical flow, and financial flow [25][26]. Integrating information flow refers to the extent to which a firm shares operational, tactical, and strategic information with its supply chain partners. Specifically, a firm needs to share its supply-and-demand-related information to have a successful integrated information flow [25][27]. Information flow integration allows firms to better understand and anticipate the changes in the customer and supply markets. Physical flow integration is defined as the firm’s level of using global optimization with its supply chain partners to manage and control the flow of materials and goods [25]. Physical flow integration is the building block of efficient inventory management and enables firms to implement some of the well-known yet complex supply chain strategies, such as just-in-time and mass customization [28]. Financial flow integration refers to the exchange of the financial resources with the supply chain partners [25]. Some examples of financial flows are prices, invoices, payments, account payables, and credit terms [25][27].

4. Analytics Capability

Analytics capability has been used in current research to refer to the capabilities that allow firms to collect, process, and analyze data in order to drive valuable insights (e.g., [29][30][31][32]). According to current reports, many organizations are investing heavily in technology to help them manage and analyze their ever-increasing data [33]. Despite this growing popularity, the academic literature on data analytics capability is still nascent [20][34], and most of the existing studies are conceptual [35]. Moreover, there are some inconsistencies in the findings of the current literature. Most of the existing studies emphasized the use of IT tools as data analytics capability [36]; however, according to the study of Srinivasan and Swink, analytics capability includes both IT tools and firms’ processes. Hence, researchers define analytics capability as organizations’ investments in developing the required tools, techniques, and processes to be able to process, organize, and analyze data to gain critical insights [20].
The existing studies have explored the role of analytics capability in enhancing organizations’ performance and have defined different elements that can increase firms’ analytics capability. For instance, a firm’s size has been found to be positively associated with a firm’s analytics capability [37]. Studies suggested that firms’ managerial practices and data capability are essential factors in driving better performance [38]. Specific to the supply chain, studies have shown that analytics capability increases supply chain agility, which leads to a competitive advantage of the firms [39] and enhances the supply chain resilience [40]. Moreover, studies have suggested different supply chain related factors that can lead to analytics capability. For instance, supply chain visibility has been found as a functional resource for developing analytics capability [20]. Another stream of research has studied the relationship between analytics capability and sustainable supply chains; for instance, Cetindamar et al. [41] conducted an exploratory study and suggested that data analytics capability can play a critical role in developing sustainable practices in organizations.
Recent studies [42][43] have argued that the integration of supply chain resources would lead to improved data analytics capability and called for future studies to empirically test this argument. To follow these recent calls, one of the main objectives of the study is to empirically test the effect of supply chain process integration on data analytics capability.

References

  1. Gartner. Gartner Executive Program Survey of More than 2000 CIOs Shows Digital Technologies Are Top Priorities. 2019. Available online: https://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2304615 (accessed on 30 June 2020).
  2. Wamba, S.F.; Gunasekaran, A.; Dubey, R.; Ngai, E.W.T. Big data analytics in operations and supply chain management. Ann. Oper. Res. 2018, 270, 1–4.
  3. Accenture. Big Data Analytics in Supply Chain: Hype or Here to Stay? Accenture Global Operations Megatrends Study. 2014. Available online: www.accenture.com/us-en/Pages/insight-global-operations-megatrends-bigdata-analytics.aspx (accessed on 17 November 2020).
  4. Côrte-Real, N.; Oliveira, T.; Ruivo, P. Assessing business value of Big Data Analytics in European firms. J. Bus. Res. 2017, 70, 379–390.
  5. Gunst, C. 10 Eye-opening Stats about the Growth of Big Data. Attunity. 2018. Available online: https://www.attunity.com/blog/10-eye-opening-stats-about-the-growth-of-big-data/ (accessed on 4 February 2019).
  6. Colas, M.; Finck, I.; Buvat, J.; Nambiar, R.; Singh, R.R. Cracking the Data Conundrum: How Successful Companies Make Big Data Operational. Capgemini Consulting. 2014. Available online: https://www.capgemini.com/consulting/wp-content/uploads/sites/30/2017/07/big_data_pov_03-02-15.pdf%0Ahttps://www.capgemini-consulting.com/resource-file-access/resource/pdf/cracking_the_data_conundrum-big_data_pov_13-1-15_v2.pdf (accessed on 15 May 2021).
  7. Deloitte. The Analytics Advantage: We’re Just Getting Started. 2013. Available online: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Deloitte-Analytics/dttl-analytics-analytics-advantage-report-061913.pdf (accessed on 17 November 2020).
  8. Asmussen, C.B.; Møller, C. Enabling supply chain analytics for enterprise information systems: A topic modelling literature review and future research agenda. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 2020, 14, 563–610.
  9. Ghasemaghaei, M. Are firms ready to use big data analytics to create value? The role of structural and psychological readiness. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 2019, 13, 650–674.
  10. Davenport, T.; Harris, J. Competing on Analytics: The New Science of Winning, Updated, W; Harvard Business Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2017.
  11. Davis, C.K. Beyond data and analysis. Commun. ACM 2014, 57, 39–41.
  12. Kiron, D.; Prentice, P.K.; Ferguson, R.B. The Analytics Mandate. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2014, 55, 1. Available online: https://search.proquest.com/openview/c2ed00c8df5cb529bbff39d9e6afc603/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=26142 (accessed on 17 November 2020).
  13. Khanra, S.; Dhir, A.; Mäntymäki, M. Big data analytics and enterprises: A bibliometric synthesis of the literature. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 2020, 14, 737–768.
  14. Gallino, S.; Moreno, A. Integration of Online and Offline Channels in Retail: The Impact of Sharing Reliable Inventory Availability Information. Manag. Sci. 2014, 60, 1434–1451.
  15. Angalakudati, M.; Balwani, S.; Calzada, J.; Chatterjee, B.; Perakis, G.; Raad, N.; Uichanco, J. Business Analytics for Flexible Resource Allocation under Random Emergencies. Manag. Sci. 2014, 60, 1552–1573.
  16. Akter, S.; Wamba, S.F. Big data and disaster management: A systematic review and agenda for future research. Ann. Oper. Res. 2017, 283, 939–959.
  17. Galbraith, J.R. Designing Complex Organizations; Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.: Reading, MA, USA, 1973. Available online: https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=540368 (accessed on 17 November 2020).
  18. Galbraith, J.R. Organization Design; Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.: Reading, MA, USA, 1977.
  19. Peng, D.X.; Heim, G.R.; Mallick, D.N. Collaborative Product Development: The Effect of Project Complexity on the Use of Information Technology Tools and New Product Development Practices. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2014, 23, 1421–1438.
  20. Srinivasan, R.; Swink, M. An Investigation of Visibility and Flexibility as Complements to Supply Chain Analytics: An Organizational Information Processing Theory Perspective. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2018, 27, 1849–1867.
  21. Chen, H.; Chiang, R.H.L.; Storey, V.C. Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big Impact. MIS Q. 2012, 36, 1165–1188.
  22. McAfee, A.; Brynjolfsson, E.; Davenport, T.H.; Patil, D.J.; Barton, D. Big Data: The Management Revolution. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2012, 90, 60–68.
  23. Nacarelli, V.; Gefen, D. Trustworthiness and the Adoption of Business Analytics. Inf. Syst. Manag. 2021, 38, 185–199.
  24. Srinivasan, R.; Swink, M. Leveraging Supply Chain Integration through Planning Comprehensiveness: An Organizational Information Processing Theory Perspective. Decis. Sci. 2015, 46, 823–861.
  25. Rai, A.; Patnayakuni, R.; Seth, N. Firm Performance Impacts of Digitally Enabled Supply Chain Integration Capabilities. MIS Q. 2006, 30, 225–246.
  26. Zolait, A.H.; Ibrahim, A.R.; Chandran, V.; Sundram, V.P.K. Supply chain integration: An empirical study on manufacturing industry in Malaysia. J. Syst. Inf. Technol. 2010, 12, 210–221.
  27. Patnayakuni, R.; Rai, A.; Seth, N. Relational Antecedents of Information Flow Integration for Supply Chain Coordination. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2006, 23, 13–49.
  28. Frohlich, M.T.; Westbrook, R. Arcs of integration: An international study of supply chain strategies. J. Oper. Manag. 2001, 19, 185–200.
  29. Souza, G.C. Supply chain analytics. Bus. Horiz. 2014, 57, 595–605.
  30. Wegener, R.; Sinha, V. The Value of Big Data: How Analytics Differentiates Winners; Brain Co.: Somerville, MA, USA, 2013.
  31. Agarwal, R.; Dhar, V. Editorial—Big Data, Data Science, and Analytics: The Opportunity and Challenge for IS Research. Inf. Syst. Res. 2014, 25, 443–448.
  32. Wamba, S.F.; Queiroz, M.M.; Wu, L.; Sivarajah, U. Big data analytics-enabled sensing capability and organizational outcomes: Assessing the mediating effects of business analytics culture. Ann. Oper. Res. 2020, 1–20.
  33. Computer Economics. Business and Data Analytics Investment Surges as Firms Devour Data. 2019. Available online: https://www.computereconomics.com/article.cfm?id=2667 (accessed on 18 November 2020).
  34. Hazen, B.T.; Skipper, J.B.; Boone, C.A.; Hill, R.R. Back in business: Operations research in support of big data analytics for operations and supply chain management. Ann. Oper. Res. 2018, 270, 201–211.
  35. Whitelock, V. Business analytics and firm performance: Role of structured financial statement data. J. Bus. Anal. 2018, 1, 81–92.
  36. Min, H.; Joo, H.-Y.; Choi, S.-B. Success Factors Affecting the Intention to Use Business Analytics: An Empirical Study. J. Bus. Anal. 2021, 4, 77–90.
  37. Liberatore, M.J.; Pollack-Johnson, B.; Clain, S.H. Analytics Capabilities and the Decision to Invest in Analytics. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 2017, 57, 364–373.
  38. Shamim, S.; Zeng, J.; Shariq, S.M.; Khan, Z. Role of big data management in enhancing big data decision-making capability and quality among Chinese firms: A dynamic capabilities view. Inf. Manag. 2019, 56, 103135.
  39. Dubey, R.; Gunasekaran, A.; Childe, S.J. Big data analytics capability in supply chain agility. Manag. Decis. 2019, 57, 2092–2112.
  40. Dubey, R.; Gunasekaran, A.; Childe, S.J.; Wamba, S.F.; Roubaud, D.; Foropon, C. Empirical investigation of data analytics capability and organizational flexibility as complements to supply chain resilience. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 59, 110–128.
  41. Cetindamar, D.; Shdifat, B.; Erfani, E. Understanding Big Data Analytics Capability and Sustainable Supply Chains. Inf. Syst. Manag. 2021, 39, 19–33.
  42. Kamble, S.S.; Gunasekaran, A.; Gawankar, S.A. Achieving sustainable performance in a data-driven agriculture supply chain: A review for research and applications. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2019, 219, 179–194.
  43. Kamble, S.; Gunasekaran, A. Big data-driven supply chain performance measurement system: A review and framework for implementation. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 65–86.
More
Information
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : , ,
View Times: 386
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 22 Jun 2022
1000/1000
ScholarVision Creations