Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 1201 2022-05-30 05:31:39 |
2 format correct Meta information modification 1201 2022-05-30 08:02:38 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Ryall, C.; Chen, S.; Duarah, S.; Wen, J. Conventional Treatment for Wounds. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/23531 (accessed on 04 July 2024).
Ryall C, Chen S, Duarah S, Wen J. Conventional Treatment for Wounds. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/23531. Accessed July 04, 2024.
Ryall, Cameron, Shuo Chen, Sanjukta Duarah, Jingyuan Wen. "Conventional Treatment for Wounds" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/23531 (accessed July 04, 2024).
Ryall, C., Chen, S., Duarah, S., & Wen, J. (2022, May 30). Conventional Treatment for Wounds. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/23531
Ryall, Cameron, et al. "Conventional Treatment for Wounds." Encyclopedia. Web. 30 May, 2022.
Conventional Treatment for Wounds
Edit

Application of modern delivery techniques to natural bioactive products improves their permeability, bioavailability, and therapeutic efficacy. Many natural products have desirable biological properties applicable to wound healing but are limited by their inability to cross the stratum corneum to access the wound. Over the past two decades, modern systems such as microneedles, lipid-based vesicles, hydrogels, composite dressings, and responsive formulations have been applied to natural products such as curcumin or aloe vera to improve their delivery and efficacy. 

wound healing natural products advanced delivery traditional medicine alternative medicine

1. TIME and TWA: Deciding on a Treatment

A key focus in today’s conventional treatment of wounds is managing the risk of a wound becoming chronic [1]. A wound should only require treatment if its natural healing is stalled or interrupted. The ‘TIME’ or ‘TWA’ processes are used to assess the wound and determine a treatment. No single treatment is applied to all wounds; hence, assessing wounds and making evidence-based decisions is emphasised [1][2]. Both TIME and TWA are acronyms. For TIME, T stands for ‘tissue non-viable or deficient’, I for ‘infection or inflammation’, M for ‘moisture balance’, and E for ‘edge of wound—non-advancing or undermined’ [1][3]. TWA stands for ‘Triangle of Wound Assessment’ [4][5]. TWA elaborates on TIME with a three-point ‘triangle’: wound bed, wound edge, and peri-wound skin [5]. TWA and TIME analysis provide a systematic way to analyse a wound and direct clinicians to the proper treatment.

2. Wound-Healing Dressings

The most common and historically present product for a wound is its dressing. The primary function of a dressing is to protect against foreign microbes and protect the skin from exudate [4][6]. It is often desirable for a dressing to be absorbent, particularly when a wound has too much exudate interfering with the patient’s daily life or creating too friendly an environment for bacteria to colonise [3]. Absorbents can be fibrous, fabric, or a combination of the two: these forms are among the most accessible wound dressings around the world [2]. Modern technologies have added to this category with hydrofibres and impregnated gauzes, which are more bioactive than their fibre/fabric counterparts [6]. Such direct dressings can have the disadvantage of being painful when removed, hence the use of non-adherent dressings. Non-adherent dressings are often preferred for the contact layer dressing as they do not attach to the wound’s tissue. Non-adherence allows the protection of granulation tissue and the epithelium at the expense of requiring a secondary dressing to secure the wound [2][5].
Water-based formations such as hydrogels and hydrocolloids are applied to wounds requiring a moist environment to heal. Hydrogels use hydrophilic polymers to attract water and create a three-dimensional network in the form of a gel. Hydrogels can be used to rehydrate a wound bed, rehydrate necrotic tissue, absorb excess exudate, or reduce pain [2][6][7]. Hydrogels can be loaded with bioactive compounds to deliver it directly to the wound area in a relatively painless manner. An available hydrogel is Curasol™ which is applied to an absorbent layer such as cotton or gauze and then taped, netted, or bandaged onto the wound. Hydrogel dressings often market themselves based on their pain relief and rehydrating abilities—one problem with these products is the complicated application that requires a healthcare professional [8]. Hydrogels are commonly applied to traditional medicine and are often fabricated using polymers derived from nature [9][10][11]. The polymers applied to hydrogels are becoming increasingly advanced; Yan et al. formulated a thermosensitive hydrogel that released a phage to combat bacterial infections. This hydrogel could be infected as a liquid but would form into a hydrogel dressing once exposed to the temperature of an inflamed wound bed [12]. Hydrocolloid dressings such as alginates have the advantage of requiring no secondary dressing. Hydrocolloid dressings are gel-forming agents that absorb and retain fluid to create a wound-moistening gel [7][13]. Hydrocolloids, like hydrogels, can be loaded with antiseptics or wound-healing drugs to make them bioactive. Hydrocolloid dressings derived from sodium alginate taken from brown seaweed are commonly used for wounds with excess exudate because of their absorptive properties. Other hydrocolloids such as Duoderm™ can be used for shallow acute wounds with little exudate present [7][14]. Hydrocolloids and hydrogels reduce pain sensation by keeping nerve endings moist and providing a provisional ECM to facilitate autolysis [7][13].
Semipermeable dressings such as foams and films can protect wounds from the external environment while allowing essential molecules to enter. Foams fabricated from polyurethane or silicone can protect against bacteria and moisten the wound bed while avoiding tissue damage when removed [15]. Foams are also used to encapsulate drugs and have been applied with natural products such as asiaticoside from Centella asiatica [16]. Recent advances in foams for wound care combine other technologies to create responsive/smart dressings. A multi-layer dressing made from an anti-microbial foam and an electrospun cellulose surface mesh was formulated by He et al. which changes colour in response to infection-caused pH changes [17]. Films are like foams by being semipermeable but are more often applied to epithelizing wounds with little exudate. Oxygen and carbon dioxide can pass through films but, similarly to foams, bacteria or pathogens are kept away. Koetse et al. and Babikian et al. have innovated different films for wound care which can record electrical signals in a wound [18][19]. Both devices aimed to capture a wide range of physiological parameters using impedance, current, and other parameters.
Another dressing that aids wound healing is bioadhesives. These adhere to the site of a wound to moisten, absorb exudate, and protect from external pathogens [20]. These can be injected as hydrogels which then adhere to the surface of a wound or be delivered as a patch placed similarly to a plaster [21]Figure 1 shows how a bioadhesive can cover a wound bed. Bioadhesives must be biocompatible and biodegradable; thus, they are often derived from nature. One bioadhesive formulated by Ke et al. used two natural products in tannic acid and silk fibroin to help develop the ECM and protect against bacterial infection [22]. Table 1 summarizes the many kinds of wound dressing. Many of these dressings are being made using natural compounds because of their biocompatibility and biodegradability; thus, it is a promising field for natural products in wound care [23].
Figure 1. Strategies for bioadhesives used to close wounds. (A) Bioadhesives are applied between wound edges. (B) Bioadhesives are applied outside of the wounds. (C) Bioadhesives are applied between and outside the wounds. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [20].
Table 1. Characteristics of wound dressings.
Type of Wound Dressing Features Limitations Product Name References
Film dressings Elastic, durable, comfortable, and conform well to body contours
Waterproof and transparent
Create a moist healing environment
Bacterial and viral barrier
Semi-permeable to water vapour and gas
Adhesive films might disrupt newly formed epithelium during dressing change
Limited use for highly exuding wounds
Might develop leakage channels
Tegaderm™ (3M™, UK Plc.)
Opsite Films® (Smith and Nephew)
Mepitel®Film (Mölnlycke Health Care Limited)
[15][17][24]
Foam dressings Highly absorbent
Easily removable
Create a moist healing environment
Bacterial and viral barrier
Semi-permeable to water vapour and gas
Form an opaque layer, making wound monitoring difficult
Limited use for dry wounds
Poor stability
Flexsan
Biopatch
Biatain
Cultinova
Lyofoam
Allevyn
Unilene
Tielle
CuraSpon
Kendall
Hydrasorb
[16][25]
Hydrogel dressings Create a moist healing environment
Pain relief
Self-applied or injectable
Facilitate autolytic debridement
Easily removed
Require a secondary dressing
Lack of mechanical strength
Inconsistent hydration properties
Poor bacterial barrier
Suprasorb®
AquaDerm™
Neoheal®
Simpurity™
DermaGauze™
Restore
[26][27][28]
Bioadhesive dressings Create a moist healing environment
Self-injectable
Adhesive
Unremovable
Interference with other medical devices
Might develop leakage channels
Ligate™ [20]

References

  1. Gray, K. TIME Wounds Will Health; Pharmac: Wellington, New Zealand, 2017.
  2. Cockbill, S.M.E.; Turner, T.D. The development of wound management products. In Chronic Wound Care: The Essentials E-Book; Krasner, D.L., van Rijswijk, L., Eds.; HMP: Melvern, KS, USA, 2018; pp. 145–164.
  3. Tottoli, E.M.; Dorati, R.; Genta, I.; Chiesa, E.; Pisani, S.; Conti, B. Skin Wound Healing Process and New Emerging Technologies for Skin Wound Care and Regeneration. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 735.
  4. Kim, H.S.; Sun, Z.; Lee, J.; Kim, H.; Fu, X.; Leong, K.W. Advanced Drug Delivery Systems and Artificial Skin Grafts for Skin Wound Healing. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2019, 146, 209–239.
  5. Romanelli, M.; Dowsett, C.; Doughty, D.; Senet, P.; Munter, C.; Martinez, J.L.L. Advances in Wound Care: The Triangle of Wound Assessment; World Union of Wound Healing Societies: London, UK, 2016.
  6. Clements, D. Skin and Wound Care Manual; St. Clare’s Mercy Hospital: St. John’s, NL, Canada, 2008.
  7. Hawkins, M. Volume D—Nursing Standards, Policies & Procedures. In Wound Care; Canterbury DHB: Christchurch, New Zealand, 2009; pp. 303–381.
  8. DermNet, N.Z. Wound Dressings; New Zealand Dermatological Society Incorporated: Wellington, New Zealand, 2009; Volume 2021.
  9. Cui, X.; Lee, J.J.L.; Chen, W.N. Eco-Friendly and Biodegradable Cellulose Hydrogels Produced from Low Cost Okara: Towards Non-Toxic Flexible Electronics. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 18166.
  10. Gao, L.; Zhang, H.; Yu, B.; Li, W.; Gao, F.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, H.; Shen, Y.; Cong, H. Chitosan Composite Hydrogels Cross-Linked by Multifunctional Diazo Resin as Antibacterial Dressings for Improved Wound Healing. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2020, 108, 1890–1898.
  11. Song, R.; Zheng, J.; Liu, Y.; Tan, Y.; Yang, Z.; Song, X.; Yang, S.; Fan, R.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y. A Natural Cordycepin/Chitosan Complex Hydrogel with Outstanding Self-Healable and Wound Healing Properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 134, 91–99.
  12. Yan, W.; Banerjee, P.; Liu, Y.; Mi, Z.; Bai, C.; Hu, H.; To, K.K.W.; Duong, H.T.T.; Leung, S.S.Y. Development of Thermosensitive Hydrogel Wound Dressing Containing Acinetobacter Baumannii Phage Against Wound Infections. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 602, 120508.
  13. Weller, C. Interactive dressings and their role in moist wound management. In Advanced Textiles for Wound Care; Rajendran, S., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2009; pp. 97–112.
  14. Wietlisbach, C.M. 17—Wound Care. In Cooper’s Fundamentals of Hand Therapy, 3rd ed.; Wietlisbach, C.M., Ed.; Mosby: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2020; pp. 154–166.
  15. Shi, C.; Wang, C.; Liu, H.; Li, Q.; Li, R.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Shao, Y.; Wang, J. Selection of Appropriate Wound Dressing for various Wounds. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 182.
  16. Namviriyachote, N.; Lipipun, V.; Akkhawattanangkul, Y.; Charoonrut, P.; Ritthidej, G.C. Development of Polyurethane Foam Dressing Containing Silver and Asiaticoside for Healing of Dermal Wound. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 14, 63–77.
  17. He, M.; Ou, F.; Wu, Y.; Sun, X.; Chen, X.; Li, H.; Sun, D.; Zhang, L. Smart Multi-Layer PVA Foam/CMC Mesh Dressing with Integrated Multi-Functions for Wound Management and Infection Monitoring. Mater. Des. 2020, 194, 108913.
  18. Koetse, M.; Rensing, P.; van Heck, G.; Sharpe, R.; Allard, B.; Wieringa, F.; Kruijt, P.; Meulendijks, N.; Jansen, H.; Schoo, H. In Plane Optical Sensor Based on Organic Electronic Devices. In Organic Field-Effect Transistors VII and Organic Semiconductors in Sensors and Bioelectronics; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2008; p. 70541I.
  19. Babikian, S.; Li, G.P.; Bachman, M. Integrated Bioflexible Electronic Device for Electrochemical Analysis of Blood. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 65th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), San Diego, CA, USA, 26–29 May 2015; pp. 685–690.
  20. Duan, W.; Bian, X.; Bu, Y. Applications of Bioadhesives: A Mini Review. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 716035.
  21. Li, J.; Yu, F.; Chen, G.; Liu, J.; Li, X.; Cheng, B.; Mo, X.; Chen, C.; Pan, J. Moist-Retaining, Self-Recoverable, Bioadhesive, and Transparent in Situ Forming Hydrogels to Accelerate Wound Healing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 2023–2038.
  22. Ke, X.; Dong, Z.; Tang, S.; Chu, W.; Zheng, X.; Zhen, L.; Chen, X.; Ding, C.; Luo, J.; Li, J. A Natural Polymer Based Bioadhesive with Self-Healing Behavior and Improved Antibacterial Properties. Biomater. Sci. 2020, 8, 4346–4357.
  23. Barros Almeida, I.; Garcez Barretto Teixeira, L.; Oliveira de Carvalho, F.; Ramos Silva, É.; Santos Nunes, P.; Viana dos Santos Márcio, R.; de Souza Araújo, A.A. Smart Dressings for Wound Healing: A Review. Adv. Skin Wound Care 2021, 34, 1–8.
  24. Gopinath, D.; Ahmed, M.R.; Gomathi, K.; Chitra, K.; Sehgal, P.K.; Jayakumar, R. Dermal Wound Healing Processes with Curcumin Incorporated Collagen Films. Biomaterials 2004, 25, 1911–1917.
  25. İnal, M.; Mülazımoğlu, G. Production and Characterization of Bactericidal Wound Dressing Material Based on Gelatin Nanofiber. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 137, 392–404.
  26. Bai, M.; Chen, M.; Yu, W.; Lin, J. Foam Dressing Incorporating Herbal Extract: An all-Natural Dressing for Potential use in Wound Healing. J. Bioact. Compat. Polym. 2017, 32, 293–308.
  27. Saldin, L.T.; Cramer, M.C.; Velankar, S.S.; White, L.J.; Badylak, S.F. Extracellular Matrix Hydrogels from Decellularized Tissues: Structure and Function. Acta Biomater. 2017, 49, 1–15.
  28. Saghazadeh, S.; Rinoldi, C.; Schot, M.; Kashaf, S.S.; Sharifi, F.; Jalilian, E.; Nuutila, K.; Giatsidis, G.; Mostafalu, P.; Derakhshandeh, H.; et al. Drug Delivery Systems and Materials for Wound Healing Applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018, 127, 138–166.
More
Information
Subjects: Dermatology
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : , , ,
View Times: 583
Entry Collection: Biopharmaceuticals Technology
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 30 May 2022
1000/1000
Video Production Service