Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 2345 2022-05-26 15:05:15 |
2 format -4 word(s) 2341 2022-05-27 03:20:08 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?


Are you sure to Delete?
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Yan, C.; Chen, M.; Px, G.; Xu, L. Semiconductor Materials for Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 01 March 2024).
Yan C, Chen M, Px G, Xu L. Semiconductor Materials for Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed March 01, 2024.
Yan, Cui, Mindong Chen, Ge Px, Leilei Xu. "Semiconductor Materials for Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2" Encyclopedia, (accessed March 01, 2024).
Yan, C., Chen, M., Px, G., & Xu, L. (2022, May 26). Semiconductor Materials for Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2. In Encyclopedia.
Yan, Cui, et al. "Semiconductor Materials for Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2." Encyclopedia. Web. 26 May, 2022.
Semiconductor Materials for Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2

The photocatalytic reduction of CO2 is one of the most effective methods to control CO2 pollution. Therefore, the development of novel high-efficiency semiconductor materials has become an important research field. Semiconductor materials need to have a structure with abundant catalytic sites, among other conditions, which is of great significance for the practical application of highly active catalysts for CO2 reduction. The photocatalytic reduction of CO2 is a surface/interface reaction. It is important to find and use raw materials which are environmentally friendly and effective as catalysts.

semiconductor materials photocatalytic carbon dioxide

1. TiO2 Photocatalyst

As an n-type semiconductor material, TiO2 is regarded as an ideal semiconductor material for environmental pollution control due to its good chemical stability, non-toxicity and environmental friendliness. It has great potential application value in the field of environment and energy [1]. In 1972, Fujishima and Honda reported [2] that TiO2 could decompose water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen under ultraviolet light, bringing extensive attention to TiO2 as a photocatalyst material. TiO2 has been widely used in the photocatalytic decomposition of decomposition of hydrogen in aquatic products [3][4][5], the degradation of pollutants [6][7][8], the reduction of CO2 [9][10][11][12] etc., and a series of research achievements have been made. TiO2 photocatalyst materials are also very common in daily life; they are widely used in solar cells, coatings, cosmetics, antibacterial materials and air purifiers, as examples.
TiO2 can be found in the form of three crystal polymorphs: anatase, rutile and brookite [13]. The three crystals have a twisted octahedral structure of six oxygen atoms around a titanium atom. Anatase and rutile forms have tetragonal crystal structures. The different electronic structures of the three crystal types of TiO2 lead to great differences in their photocatalytic performance. Tang et al. [14] studied the effect of different crystal types on the photocatalytic performance of TiO2. It was found that the degradation rate of pollutants was nearly 100% when anatase or mixes with anatase and rutile forms was used as photocatalyst. The degradation rate was less than 15% when pure rutile TiO2 was used as photocatalyst. Jin et al. [15] prepared PbO-decorated TiO2 composites by a one-pot method with highly photoactive CO2 conversion. The heterojunction formed by the catalyst could effectively inhibit the recombination of photogenerated charge, while the PbO could improve the adsorption of CO2 on the catalyst. Therefore, the photocatalytic activity of the heterojunction complex for CO2 reduction was significantly improved.
Morphology is also an important factor affecting the photocatalytic performance of TiO2. The specific surface areas, active sites, charge transfer rates and exposed crystal surfaces of TiO2 catalysts with different morphologies are significantly different, leading to great differences in their performance. Cao et al. [16] prepared a TiO2 photocatalyst with nanorods and nanorod-hierarchical nanostructures. The catalyst had better photocatalytic performance for CO2 reduction than commercial TiO2 (P25). The high catalytic activity was mainly attributed to the improved charge transfer performance, specific surface area and light absorption performance of the catalyst lent by the nanorod-hierarchical nanostructures. Tan et al. [17] synthesized an Ag/Pd bimetal supported on a N-doped TiO2 nanosheet for CO2 reduction. Due to the modification of the Ag/Pd bimetal and the N doping, the absorption of visible light in the TiO2 nanosheets was improved. This system also provided abundant surface defects and oxygen vacancies for the TiO2 nanosheets, causing the catalyst to exhibit high performance for the photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to CH4. Kar et al. [18] prepared a TiO2 nanotube photocatalyst which showed a highly efficient photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to CH4. The high photocatalytic activity was mainly attributed to the enhancement of visible light absorption by the nanotube structure. In addition to the crystal size and morphology of TiO2 catalyst, the intensity of the external light source also has an effect on the photocatalytic activity of TiO2—generally, as the light intensity increases, more photogenerated electrons are generated by the catalyst’s excitation, and the photocatalytic reaction is promoted as a result. Yang et al. [19] found that the photocatalytic degradation rate of TiO2 to paracetamol attenuated with the decrease of light intensity.

2. Co/Ni-Based Catalysts

The transition metals cobalt and nickel, which have various redox states, have been widely used in the study of photocatalytic CO2 reduction due to their rich crustal content, low cost, high catalytic activity for CO2 and strong adsorption capacity [20][21][22]. In 2015, Wang et al. [23] prepared Co-ZIF-9 by a solvothermal method for the study of photocatalytic CO2 reduction. The results showed that the three-dimensional MOFs structure of Co-ZIF-9 was beneficial for CO2 enrichment. The Co2+ ions and imidazole groups played a synergistic role in the photocatalytic reduction of CO2. The Co2+ ion was beneficial for electron transport, and the imidazole group was beneficial for the activation of CO2 molecules. Wang et al. [24][25] also studied the photocatalytic CO2 reduction performance of cobalt-based spinel oxides. MnCo2O4 microspheres and ZnCo2O4 nanorods were prepared by solvothermal calcination and hydrothermal methods, respectively. The results showed that both catalysts exhibited excellent catalytic stability, which confirmed the possibility of Co-based spinel oxides for photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Zhang et al. [26] studied the performance of six Co-MOFs with different coordination environments applied to photocatalytic CO2 reduction. In pure CO2 atmosphere, the MAF-X27l-OH material had high CO selectivity (98.2%). When the relative pressure of CO2 dropped to 0.1 atm, the conversion rate of MAF-X27l-OH remained at about 80%, while the CO conversion rate of Co-MOF materials without this ligand decreased significantly. These results suggest that MAF-X27l-OH has excellent photocatalytic CO2 reduction performance. These conclusions provide a theoretical basis for future studies on the photocatalytic CO2 reduction of Co-based nanocatalysts.
In addition to Co-based nanomaterials, many Ni-based nanomaterials have also been applied in the study of photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Niu et al. [27] synthesized a spongy nickel-organic heterogeneous photocatalyst (Ni(TPA/TEG), which could effectively adsorb CO2. This novel Ni-based photocatalyst significantly inhibited the production of H2, CH4 and CH3OH during the photocatalytic reduction of CO2. Thus, efficient CO2 conversion was achieved, and the selectivity of CO was close to 100%. Yu et al. [28] obtained a covalent organic framework bearing single Ni sites (Ni-TpBpy) for the selective reduction of CO2 to CO. The results showed that Ni-TpBpy effectively promoted the formation of CO in the reaction medium, and the selectivity of CO was 96% after 5 h of reaction. More importantly, the catalyst maintained 76% CO selectivity in a low CO2 atmosphere. Ni-TpBpy showed good photocatalytic performance for the selective reduction of CO2, which was mainly attributed to the synergistic effect of single Ni catalytic site and TpBpy supporter.

3. Metal Halide Perovskites (MHPs)

In recent years, metal halide perovskite (MHP) materials have become attractive in the field of optoelectronics and energy conversion [29]. Compared with traditional semiconductor nanocrystals, these materials have high extinction coefficient, narrow band emission, long carrier diffusion length and high defect tolerance. In addition, the diversity of perovskite structures also allows the band gap to be adjusted in order to enhance light capture [30]. The crystal structure of MHPs is similar to that of oxide perovskite. The chemical formula is ABX3, where A is a monovalent cation, B is a divalent metal cation (the most common are Pb2+ and Sn2+) and X is a halogen ion. MHP nanocrystals exhibit a halogen-rich surface structure. Perovskites can be classified as inorganic or organic-inorganic hybrid halogenated perovskites according to the type of cations in their chemical structure. The emergence of MHPs with unique photoelectric characteristics brings new opportunities for efficient photocatalytic CO2 reduction.
Since the reduction potential of MHPs for CO2 reduction usually changes with the nanocrystal size, the catalytic activity of MHP nanocrystals is also affected by their size. Sun et al. [31] first synthesized CsPbBr3 quantum dots of different sizes to study the effect of quantum dot size on CO2 reduction. It was found that CsPbBr3 with a diameter of 8.5 nm had the longest carrier lifetime, more negative band bottom potential and the highest catalytic activity. Xu et al. [32] designed CsPbBr3/GO composites by combining graphene oxide (GO) with CsPbBr3 and used them for photocatalytic CO2 reduction. The CsPbBr3/GO composites exhibited higher CO2 reduction activity than pure CsPbBr3 nanocrystals. It was found that the improved CO2 reduction performance was mainly attributed to the existence of efficient charge transfer in CsPbBr3/GO composites, and charge injection graphene oxide effectively promoted the charge injection from MHPs to GO. Other studies have shown that the catalytic activity of MHPs can be improved by coupling various modifiers with MHPs nanocrystals. Man et al. [33] used NHx-rich porous g-C3N4 nanosheets (PCNs) to stabilize CsPbBr3 nanocrystals. The formation of a N–Br bond leads to close contact with g-C3N4 nanocrystals and CsPbBr3 nanocrystals. In order to suppress the serious charge recombination in MHPs, Jiang et al. [34] designed a novel Z-scheme alpha-Fe2O3/amine-RGO/CsPbBr3 catalyst for high-efficiency CO2 reduction. The construction of the Z-scheme heterojunction promoted charge separation and retained strong reducing electrons in CsPbBr3 as well as strong oxidation holes in α-Fe2O3. Finally, it promoted the activity of artificial photosynthesis.

4. Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs)

Metal-organic framework materials (MOFs) are organic-inorganic hybrid materials with intramolecular pores formed by self-assembly between inorganic metal ions or clusters and organic ligands through coordination bonds. MOFs’ large specific surface area, high porosity and tunable structure make them energy storage materials with strong development potential. The structure of MOFs can be controlled by changing the central metal atoms and the interaction between different organic ligands. Transition metals such as Fe, Co and Ni are often selected as central metal sources. As the raw materials of MOFs, such transition metals are abundant, widely distributed and easily available on Earth, which to some extent makes the raw materials cost of MOFs low. Therefore, MOFs are widely used in catalytic energy conversion and other applications [35]. In photocatalytic processes, MOFs can be used as photocatalysts or modifiers to promote the photocatalytic reaction.
MOFs are a relatively new type of frame material, and their uniformly dispersed metal nodes are conducive to the adsorption and activation of gas molecules. The combination of semiconductors and MOFs to form inorganic-organic nanocomposites can not only satisfy the absorption of photons by semiconductor materials to generate carriers, but also enable the materials to adsorb and activate highly stable CO2 molecules. Xiong et al. [36] developed a method for synthesizing Cu3(BTC)2@TiO2 core-shell structures. The loose shell structure of TiO2 facilitates the passage of CO2 molecules through the shell, while the strong CO2 absorption of Cu3(BTC)2 in the core favors the efficient CO2 reduction of nanocomposites. Wu et al. [37] designed and constructed inorganic perovskite quantum dots and organic MOF complexes. A series of MAPbI(3)@PCN-221(Fe-x) composite photocatalytic materials were prepared by encapsulating quantum dots in MOF channels by a deposition method. In the aqueous phase, the MAPbI(3)@PCN-221(Fe-0.2) composite structure showed a high photocatalytic activity for CO2—much higher than that of PCN-221(Fe-0.2). At the same time, hole oxidation oxidized H2O to O2 to achieve the total decomposition of CO2. Alvaro et al. [38] reported that MOF-5 produced by the coordination of Zn2+ and terephthalic acid has semiconductor-like properties. There is an electron-hole separation and transfer process in which electrons migrate from ligand to adjacent metal nodes for the photocatalytic degradation of phenol. Subsequently, a great deal of research was conducted on the construction and development of MOFs with semiconductor properties. On the one hand, MOFs act as light absorbers. On the other hand, due to their unique structural characteristics, they can be used as highly efficient catalysts integrating light absorption and catalytic active sites [39]. Fang et al. [40] designed and synthesized a pyrazolyl porphyrinic Ni-MOF (PCN-601) with active sites of light capture exposure and high specific surface area. The experimental results showed that PCN-601 had high-efficiency CO2 photoreduction performance under the condition of CO2-saturated water vapor. Under the condition of simulated solar irradiation (AM 1.5 G), the CH4 yield of PCN-601 reached 92 μmol·h−1·g−1 and the apparent quantum yield (AQY) of CH4 was 2.18%. Therefore, the accumulated research suggests that MOFs have the best interfacial charge transfer and kinetic process among the materials evaluated for photocatalytic CO2 reduction. The optimal catalytic activity was obtained in the catalytic reaction system, which provided a new direction for guiding and controlling the synthesis of new MOF materials.

5. Other Semiconductor Photocatalysts

Compared with commonly used photocatalysts (MHPs, MOFs, TiO2, etc.), other efficient photocatalytic materials for the reduction of CO2 need to be developed and studied. The conduction band position of SiC has a comparatively more negative potential, which can produce photogenerated electrons with stronger reduction ability for the photocatalytic reduction of CO2. However, the synthesis of SiC in a high-temperature protective atmosphere is not conducive to the regulation of its nanostructure [41][42]. Layered double hydroxides (LDHs) such as Zn–Al LDH [43], Mg–Al LDH [44] and Zn–Cu–Ga LDH [45] have been used for the photocatalytic reduction of CO2. Teramura et al. [46] synthesized a variety of LDHs with surface alkaline sites for the photocatalytic conversion of CO2 to CO. Their activities tend to be higher than that of pure hydroxide. Graphite carbon nitride (g-C3N4) is a metal-free polymer material considered to be a promising visible-light catalyst [47][48]. Hsu et al. [49] used graphene oxide as a catalyst for the efficient photocatalytic conversion of CO2 to methanol, and synthesized a graphene catalyst with an improved method to improve the activity. The yield of CH3OH was six times that obtained using pure TiO2. The photocatalytic activity of highly porous Ga2O3 for the reduction of CO2 was found to be more than four times that of commercial Ga2O3 without the need for additives [50]. The performance of porous Ga2O3 was improved by doubling the surface area and tripling the adsorption capacity. Tanaka et al. [51] used H2 instead of H2O as a reducing agent to photocatalytically reduce CO2 on Ga2O3, and the product was CO instead of CH4. Notably, nearly 7.3% of the surface-adsorbed CO2 was converted.
An effective strategy is to develop new semiconductor photocatalysts with visible-light response to improve the utilization rate of sunlight, so as to obtain higher photocatalytic activity. Zhou et al. [52] prepared Bi2WO6 square nanoplates by a hydrothermal method, and the product obtained by reducing CO2 was CH4.


  1. Shen, Y.; Ren, F.; Liu, H. Progress in Research on Photocatalytic Performance of Doped-TiO2. Rare Met. Mater. Eng. 2006, 35, 1841–1844.
  2. Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode. Nature 1972, 238, 37–38.
  3. Miodynska, M.; Mikolajczyk, A.; Bajorowicz, B.; Zwara, J.; Klimczuk, T.; Lisowski, W.; Trykowski, G.; Pinto, H.P.; Zaleska-Medynska, A. Urchin-Like TiO2 Structures Decorated with Lanthanide-Doped Bi2S3 Quantum Dots to Boost Hydrogen Photogeneration Performance. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 272, 118962.
  4. Wang, J.; Shen, Y.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Y. Single 2D Mxene Precursor-Derived TiO2 Nanosheets with a Uniform Decoration of Amorphous Carbon for Enhancing Photocatalytic Water Splitting. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 270, 118885.
  5. Li, F.; Xiao, X.; Zhao, C.; Liu, J.; Li, Q.; Guo, C.; Tian, C.; Zhang, L.; Hu, J.; Jiang, B. TiO2-on-C3N4 Double-Shell Microtubes: In-Situ Fabricated Heterostructures toward Enhanced Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 572, 22–30.
  6. Rao, Z.; Shi, G.; Wang, Z.; Mahmood, A.; Xie, X.; Sun, J. Photocatalytic Degradation of Gaseous Vocs over Tm3+-TiO2: Revealing the Activity Enhancement Mechanism and Different Reaction Paths. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 395, 125078.
  7. Feizpoor, S.; Habibi-Yangjeh, A.; Seifzadeh, D.; Ghosh, S. Combining Carbon Dots and Ag6Si2O7 Nanoparticles with TiO2: Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalysts with Efficient Performance for Removal of Pollutants. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 248, 116928.
  8. Porcar-Santos, O.; Cruz-Alcalde, A.; Lopez-Vinent, N.; Zanganas, D.; Sans, C. Photocatalytic Degradation of Sulfamethoxazole Using TiO2 in Simulated Seawater: Evidence for Direct Formation of Reactive Halogen Species and Halogenated by-Products. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 736, 139605.
  9. Li, K.; Teng, C.; Wang, S.; Min, Q. Recent Advances in TiO2-Based Heterojunctions for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction with Water Oxidation: A Review. Front. Chem. 2021, 9, 637501.
  10. Nguyen, T.P.; Nguyen DL, T.; Nguyen, V.H.; Le, T.H.; Vo DV, N.; Trinh, Q.T.; Bae, S.-R.; Chae, S.Y.; Kim, S.Y.; Le, Q.V. Recent Advances in TiO2-Based Photocatalysts for Reduction of CO2 to Fuels. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 337.
  11. Shehzad, N.; Tahir, M.; Johari, K.; Murugesan, T.; Hussain, M. A Critical Review on TiO2 Based Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction System: Strategies to Improve Efficiency. J. CO2 Util. 2018, 26, 98–122.
  12. Tahir, M.; Amin, N.S. Advances in Visible Light Responsive Titanium Oxide-Based Photocatalysts for CO2 Conversion to Hydrocarbon Fuels. Energy Convers. Manag. 2013, 76, 194–214.
  13. Wu, L.; Fu, C.; Huang, W. Surface Chemistry of TiO2 Connecting Thermal Catalysis and Photocatalysis. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020, 22, 9875–9909.
  14. Tang, J.; Chen, Y.; Dong, Z. Effect of Crystalline Structure on Terbuthylazine Degradation by H2O2-Assisted TiO2 Photocatalysis under Visible Irradiation. J. Environ. Sci. 2019, 79, 153–160.
  15. Jin, J.; Chen, S.; Wang, J.; Chen, C.; Peng, T. One-Pot Hydrothermal Preparation of PbO-Decorated Brookite/Anatase TiO2 Composites with Remarkably Enhanced CO2 Photoreduction Activity. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 263, 118353.
  16. Cao, M.-Q.; Liu, K.; Zhou, H.-M.; Li, H.-M.; Gao, X.-H.; Qiu, X.-Q.; Liu, M. Hierarchical TiO2 Nanorods with a Highly Active Surface for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. J. Cent. South Univ. 2019, 26, 1503–1509.
  17. Tan, D.; Zhang, J.; Shi, J.; Li, S.; Zhang, B.; Tan, X.; Zhang, F.; Liu, L.; Shao, D.; Han, B. Photocatalytic CO2 Transformation to CH4 by Ag/Pd Bimetals Supported on N-Doped TiO2 Nanosheet. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 24516–24522.
  18. Kar, P.; Zeng, S.; Zhang, Y.; Vahidzadeh, E.; Manuel, A.; Kisslinger, R.; Alam, K.M.; Thakur, U.K.; Mahdi, N.; Kumar, P.; et al. High Rate CO2 Photoreduction Using Flame Annealed TiO2 Nanotubes. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 243, 522–536.
  19. Yang, L.; Yu, L.E.; Ray, M.B. Degradation of Paracetamol in Aqueous Solutions by TiO2 Photocatalysis. Water Res. 2008, 42, 3480–3488.
  20. Shimoda, T.; Morishima, T.; Kodama, K.; Hirose, T.; Polyansky, D.E.; Manbeck, G.F.; Muckerman, J.T.; Fujita, E. Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction by Trigonal-Bipyramidal Cobalt(II) Polypyridyl Complexes: The Nature of Cobalt(I) and Cobalt(0) Complexes Upon Their Reactions with CO2, CO, or Proton. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 5486–5498.
  21. Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; Lou, X.W. Dispersed Nickel Cobalt Oxyphosphide Nanoparticles Confined in Multichannel Hollow Carbon Fibers for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 17236–17240.
  22. Xu, J.; Liu, X.; Zhou, Z.; Xu, M. Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction Catalyzed by Metalloporphyrin: Understanding of Cobalt and Nickel Sites in Activity and Adsorption. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 513, 145801.
  23. Wang, S.; Yao, W.; Lin, J.; Ding, Z.; Wang, X. Cobalt Imidazolate Metal-Organic Frameworks Photosplit CO2 under Mild Reaction Conditions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1034–1038.
  24. Wang, S.; Ding, Z.; Wang, X. A Stable ZnCo2O4 Cocatalyst for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 1517–1519.
  25. Wang, S.; Hou, Y.; Wang, X. Development of a Stable MnCo2O4 Cocatalyst for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction with Visible Light. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 4327–4335.
  26. Wang, Y.; Huang, N.-Y.; Shen, J.-Q.; Liao, P.-Q.; Chen, X.-M.; Zhang, J.-P. Hydroxide Ligands Cooperate with Catalytic Centers in Metal-Organic Frameworks for Efficient Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. JACS 2018, 140, 38–41.
  27. Niu, K.; Xu, Y.; Wang, H.; Ye, R.; Xin, H.L.; Lin, F.; Tian, C.; Lum, Y.; Bustillo, K.C.; Doeff, M.M.; et al. A Spongy Nickel-Organic CO2 Reduction Photocatalyst for Nearly 100% Selective CO Production. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, 1700921.
  28. Zhong, W.; Sa, R.; Li, L.; He, Y.; Li, L.; Bi, J.; Zhuang, Z.; Yu, Y.; Zou, Z. A Covalent Organic Framework Bearing Single Ni Sites as a Synergistic Photocatalyst for Selective Photoreduction of CO2 to CO. JACS 2019, 141, 7615–7621.
  29. Chen, J.; Dong, C.; Idriss, H.; Mohammed, O.F.; Bakr, O.M. Metal Halide Perovskites for Solar-to-Chemical Fuel Conversion. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 1902433.
  30. Liang, S.; Zhang, M.; Biesold, G.M.; Choi, W.; He, Y.; Li, Z.; Shen, D.; Lin, Z. Recent Advances in Synthesis, Properties, and Applications of Metal Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals/Polymer Nanocomposites. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2005888.
  31. Hou, J.; Cao, S.; Wu, Y.; Gao, Z.; Liang, F.; Sun, Y.; Lin, Z.; Sun, L. Inorganic Colloidal Perovskite Quantum Dots for Robust Solar CO2 Reduction. Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 9481–9485.
  32. Xu, Y.-F.; Yang, M.-Z.; Chen, B.-X.; Wang, X.-D.; Chen, H.-Y.; Kuang, D.-B.; Su, C.-Y. A CsPbBr3 Perovskite Quantum Dot/Graphene Oxide Composite for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. JACS 2017, 139, 5660–5663.
  33. Ou, M.; Tu, W.; Yin, S.; Xing, W.; Wu, S.; Wang, H.; Wan, S.; Zhong, Q.; Xu, R. Amino-Assisted Anchoring of CsPbBr3 Perovskite Quantum Dots on Porous g-C3N4 for Enhanced Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 13570–13574.
  34. Jiang, Y.; Liao, J.-F.; Chen, H.-Y.; Zhang, H.-H.; Li, J.-Y.; Wang, X.-D.; Kuang, D.-B. All-Solid-State Z-Scheme Alpha-Fe2O3/Amine-RGO/CsPbBr3 Hybrids for Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Chem 2020, 6, 766–780.
  35. Zhu, L.; Liu, X.-Q.; Jiang, H.-L.; Sun, L.-B. Metal-Organic Frameworks for Heterogeneous Basic Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 8129–8176.
  36. Li, R.; Hu, J.; Deng, M.; Wang, H.; Wang, X.; Hu, Y.; Jiang, H.-L.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Xie, Y.; et al. Integration of an Inorganic Semiconductor with a Metal-Organic Framework: A Platform for Enhanced Gaseous Photocatalytic Reactions. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4783–4788.
  37. Wu, L.-Y.; Mu, Y.-F.; Guo, X.-X.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Z.-M.; Zhang, M.; Lu, T.-B. Encapsulating Perovskite Quantum Dots in Iron-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) for Efficient Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 9491–9495.
  38. Alvaro, M.; Carbonell, E.; Ferrer, B.; Llabres i Xamena, F.X.; Garcia, H. Semiconductor Behavior of a Metal-Organic Framework (MOF). Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 5106–5112.
  39. Ma, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Jiang, H.-L. Switching on the Photocatalysis of Metal-Organic Frameworks by Engineering Structural Defects. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 12175–12179.
  40. Fang, Z.-B.; Liu, T.-T.; Liu, J.; Jin, S.; Wu, X.-P.; Gong, X.-Q.; Wang, K.; Yin, Q.; Liu, T.-F.; Cao, R.; et al. Boosting Interfacial Charge-Transfer Kinetics for Efficient Overall CO2 Photoreduction Via Rational Design of Coordination Spheres on Metal-Organic Frameworks. JACS 2020, 142, 12515–12523.
  41. Han, C.; Lei, Y.; Wang, B.; Wu, C.; Zhang, X.; Shen, S.; Sun, L.; Tian, Q.; Feng, Q.; Wang, Y. The Functionality of Surface Hydroxyls on Selective Ch4 Generation from Photoreduction of CO2 over Sic Nanosheets. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 1572–1575.
  42. Yang, T.C.; Chang, F.C.; Peng, C.Y.; Wang, H.P.; Wei, Y.L. Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2 with Sic Recovered from Silicon Sludge Wastes. Environ. Technol. 2015, 36, 2987–2990.
  43. Ahmed, N.; Shibata, Y.; Taniguchi, T.; Izumi, Y. Photocatalytic Conversion of Carbon Dioxide into Methanol Using Zinc-Copper-M(III) (M = Aluminum, Gallium) Layered Double Hydroxides. J. Catal. 2011, 279, 123–135.
  44. Gao, G.; Zhu, Z.; Zheng, J.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Q.; Yan, Y. Ultrathin Magnetic Mg-Al Ldh Photocatalyst for Enhanced CO2 Reduction: Fabrication and Mechanism. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 555, 1–10.
  45. Kawamura, S.; Ahmed, N.; Carja, G.; Izumi, Y. Photocatalytic Conversion of Carbon Dioxide Using Zn-Cu-Ga Layered Double Hydroxides Assembled with Cu Phthalocyanine: Cu in Contact with Gaseous Reactant Is Needed for Methanol Generation. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 2015, 70, 841–852.
  46. Teramura, K.; Iguchi, S.; Mizuno, Y.; Shishido, T.; Tanaka, T. Photocatalytic Conversion of CO2 in Water over Layered Double Hydroxides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 8008–8011.
  47. Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Antonietti, M. Polymeric Graphitic Carbon Nitride as a Heterogeneous Organocatalyst: From Photochemistry to Multipurpose Catalysis to Sustainable Chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 68–89.
  48. Niu, P.; Zhang, L.; Liu, G.; Cheng, H.-M. Graphene-Like Carbon Nitride Nanosheets for Improved Photocatalytic Activities. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 4763–4770.
  49. Hsu, H.-C.; Shown, I.; Wei, H.-Y.; Chang, Y.-C.; Du, H.-Y.; Lin, Y.-G.; Tseng, C.-A.; Wang, C.-H.; Chen, L.-C.; Lin, Y.-C.; et al. Graphene Oxide as a Promising Photocatalyst for CO2 to Methanol Conversion. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 262–268.
  50. Park, H.-A.; Choi, J.H.; Choi, K.M.; Lee, D.K.; Kang, J.K. Highly Porous Gallium Oxide with a High CO2 Affinity for the Photocatalytic Conversion of Carbon Dioxide into Methane. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 5304–5307.
  51. Tsuneoka, H.; Teramura, K.; Shishido, T.; Tanaka, T. Adsorbed Species of CO2 and H2 on Ga2O3 for the Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 8892–8898.
  52. Zhou, Y.; Tian, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, Q.; Kou, J.; Chen, X.; Gao, J.; Yan, S.; Zou, Z. High-Yield Synthesis of Ultrathin and Uniform Bi2WO6 Square Nanoplates Benefitting from Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2 into Renewable Hydrocarbon Fuel under Visible Light. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 3594–3601.
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to : , , ,
View Times: 808
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 27 May 2022