Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Jing Zou
 -- 3987 2022-04-26 14:22:00 |
2 format
Jason Zhu
 -24 word(s) 3963 2022-04-27 03:46:46 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Zou, J.; Chang, X. Whey for Bioethanol Production by Yeast. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/22308 (accessed on 16 November 2024).
Zou J, Chang X. Whey for Bioethanol Production by Yeast. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/22308. Accessed November 16, 2024.
Zou, Jing, Xuedong Chang. "Whey for Bioethanol Production by Yeast" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/22308 (accessed November 16, 2024).
Zou, J., & Chang, X. (2022, April 26). Whey for Bioethanol Production by Yeast. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/22308
Zou, Jing and Xuedong Chang. "Whey for Bioethanol Production by Yeast." Encyclopedia. Web. 26 April, 2022.
Whey for Bioethanol Production by Yeast
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/jof8040395

Concerns about fossil fuel depletion and the environmental effects of greenhouse gas emissions have led to widespread fermentation-based production of bioethanol from corn starch or sugarcane. However, competition for arable land with food production has led to the extensive investigation of lignocellulosic sources and waste products of the food industry as alternative sources of fermentable sugars. In particular, whey, a lactose-rich, inexpensive byproduct of dairy production, is available in stable, high quantities worldwide. Therefore, whey is indeed an ideal alternative feedstock for fuel ethanol feedstock because it can provide a remarkable 6–10 million tons of lactose annually. However, despite the availability of this massive, underutilized resource, it faces challenges in being adopted at a commercial scale since S. cerevisiae, the most common fermentative species for transforming sugars to ethanol, lacks the enzyme required for lactose utilization and thus cannot ferment whey into ethanol without further metabolic engineering. 

whey bioethanol lactose S. cerevisiae Kluyveromyces

1. The Lactose/Galactose Metabolic Pathway and Its Regulation in Fungi

1.1. Lactose/Galactose Consumption in Fungi

Lactose is a disaccharide formed from galactose and glucose and chemically defined as O-ß-d-galactopyranosyl-(1–4)-β-d-glucose. In addition to lactic acid bacteria and enterobacteria that are able to utilize lactose as a sole carbon through different transport systems [1][2][3][4], some fungi, such as Aspergillus [5][6][7], Trichoderma reesei [8][9], and members of the yeast genus Kluyveromyces [10][11][12] also display this metabolic capability. In these fungi, lactose is utilized through two principal mechanisms: (1) the lactose is extracellularly hydrolyzed into d-glucose and d-galactose, which are subsequently taken up by the fungi and (2) the disaccharide is first imported into the cytosol and then hydrolyzed into glucose and galactose.
T. reesei uses the former pathway for lactose uptake, although the extracellular β-galactosidase (encoded by bga1 gene) is a critical factor for lactose-induced cellulase production [13][14]. A. nidulans and K. lactis, a model microorganism of Kluyveromyces yeast, both utilize lactose through the latter strategy by lactose permease (encoded by LAC12 gene)-mediated transport of the disaccharide into the intracellular compartment and subsequent hydrolysis by β-galactosidase (encoded by the LAC4 gene) into glucose and β-d-galactose. In most eukaryotes, α-d-galactose is converted by aldose 1-epimerase to the α-anomer before entering the Leloir pathway[15][16], although filamentous fungi contain a second pathway, the oxido-reductive catabolic pathway, for α-d-galactose catabolism [6][17]. However, some strains of K. marxianus have been found to hydrolyze lactose outside of the cell[18][19].
Unlike K. lactis, S. cerevisiae lacks the gene for β-galactosidase synthesis, although some S. cerevisiae strains can secrete intracellular α-galactosidase, encoded by the MEL1 gene. These S. cerevisiae strains can thus utilize melibiose as a sole carbon source [20][21]. In S. cerevisiae and K. lactis, galactose is catabolized through the Leloir pathway, which includes a four-step enzymatic reaction [15][16]. In S. cerevisiae, the galactokinase Gal1 mediates the initial phosphorylation of galactose in an ATP-dependent manner, resulting in galactose-1-phosphate. Then, uridine diphosphoglucose 4-epimerase (Gal10) exchanges glucose in UDP-glucose with the phosphorylated galactose, thereby generating UDP-galactose, changing the stereochemistry at C4 to create UDP-glucose. In the third step, galactose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase (Gal7) uses glucose moieties released in the previous step to generate glucose-1-phosphate from galactose-1-phosphate. In the fourth step, glucose-1-phosphate is converted into glucose-6-phosphate through phosphoglucomutase (Gal5) activity. In S. cerevisiae, phosphoglucomutase is encoded by PGM2[16][22][23][24]. Among the four catalytic enzymes required for the Leloir pathway, Gal1, Gal7, and Gal10, which form a cluster of similarly regulated genes located on chromosome II, are specific to this pathway, while phosphoglucomutase contributes to metabolic pathways for many different carbon sources.

1.2. GAL Gene Regulation in S. cerevisiae and K. lactis

In yeast, the expression of GAL genes is tightly regulated by different carbon sources through three main GAL-specific regulatory proteins: a transcriptional activator, Gal4; a repressor, Gal80; and a ligand sensor, Gal3. Furthermore, GAL regulation is divided into three states depending on the carbon source. First, in the presence of aerobic or respiratory carbon sources, such as glycerol or raffinose, GAL genes are in an inactive or non-induced state that is expressed only at basal levels. In K. lactis, basal GAL gene expression is higher than that in S. cerevisiae due to the higher endogenous levels of KlGal4 protein induced by an autoregulatory positive feedback loop [25][26][27][28].
In the second state, when galactose is present in the medium, GAL genes are in the induced or activated state. Galactose is imported into the cytosol by Gal2 permease, where it binds Gal3p, which also allosterically binds ATP, resulting in Gal3p activation. The activated galactose-ATP-Gal3 complex interacts with Gal80 through a cooperative network of hydrogen bonds [29][30]. As a result of this interaction, Gal80 disassociates from Gal4, and Gal4 is released to transcriptionally activate GAL genes, ultimately leading to >1000-fold increases in GAL2, GAL1, GAL7, and GAL10 expression in S. cerevisiae [31]. Apart from GAL4 itself, the other GAL genes harbor specific upstream activating sequences (UAS) in their promoter regions that are recognized by Gal4 homodimers to induce their transcription. Notably, the GAL4 gene lacks a Gal4 binding site in S. cerevisiae, while the LAC9 gene (i.e., KlGAL4) in K. lactis has a weak UAS bind site. Consequently, Gal4 concentration in K. lactis is two- to three-fold higher than that in S. cerevisiae in the non-induced state [32][33]. In addition, there is no GAL3 gene in K. lactis, and its function is substituted by Gal1, a bi-functional protein that acts as a GAL gene inducer in addition to its function as a galactokinase [33].
In the third regulatory state, GAL gene expression is actively repressed in the presence of glucose, or so-called glucose repression. To induce glucose repression, the concentration of the transcriptional repressor Mig1, a Cys2-His2 Zinc-finger DNA-binding protein, increases within minutes of yeast cell exposure to glucose, after which Gal80 enters the nucleus and interacts with the general co-repressor complex Cyc8/Ssn6-Tup1, to form a complex that targets a specific upstream repression sequence (URSG) present in the promoter region of GAL genes [34][35][36]. For K. lactis, which is more adapted to lactose/galactose-rich environments, glucose repression of GAL/LAC gene expression is absent in some K. lactis strains, and in strains that do exhibit glucose repression, the repression is less pronounced than in S. cerevisiae. This phenomenon is reflected by the fact that only the GAL1 gene promoter in K. lactis carries a URSG, whereas the promoters of GAL1/2/3/4 all harbor URSG motifs in S. cerevisiae [26][28].
In addition to this canonical model of GAL gene regulation, previously unrecognized regulators of GAL gene function are still emerging. For instance, deletion of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit COX9 results in a respiration-deficient strain that can rapidly and efficiently ferment galactose [37]. Other work has shown that the SIP1 gene, which encodes a component of the Snf1 kinase heterotrimer complex, is a regulator of preferential glucose consumption in S. cerevisiae [38]. Deletion of SIP1 can destroy the glucose repression at 1:10 ratio of galactose-to-glucose [39]. In addition, the MIG1-related protein Imp2p has also been reported to control GAL gene expression by positively affecting glucose de-repression of maltose, galactose, and raffinose metabolic pathways. This protein was also found to contribute to thermal, oxidative, or osmotic stress resistances in yeast [35].

2. Bioethanol Production from Whey/Lactose by Kluyveromyces

While the fermentation of alcohol from cheese whey or whey permeate represents a relatively new approach to mitigating waste from the dairy industry, yeast-based fermentation of lactose from whey to generate ethanol is first introduced as early as the 1940s, or possibly earlier [40][41][42]. The separation of whey proteins generates whey permeate, which contains the majority of lactose and other whey solids. Industrial facilities that use whey permeate for ethanol production have been established in Ireland, New Zealand, the United States, and Germany. Among these, the first plant to commercially produce ethanol from whey permeate was built in 1978 in Ireland by Carbery Milk Products Ltd. to produce alcohol for beverages. This company has also produced ethanol from whey for E85 and E5 oil blends since 2005 [43]. The process first established at this plant is also employed at fermentation facilities in the United States and New Zealand.
The private producer of ethanol from casein whey feedstock is Anchor Ethanol Ltd., a subsidiary of the Fonterra New Zealand dairy cooperative, which claims to produce ~5 million gallons of ethanol annually. In the United States, whey permeate is fermented at two industrial-scale plants, both using the Carbery process, that are together responsible for 8 million gallons of fuel ethanol annually [44]. The Carbery process uses batch fermentations and continuous distillation in which the pH of the permeate is reduced to 5.0 with sour whey or acid, then pasteurized by heating to 85 °C for 15 s. The pasteurized permeate is then chilled to 34 °C, loaded into the bioreactor, and inoculated with K. marxianus. The conditions have been optimized for efficient and rapid lactose conversion to ethanol in 12 h fermentations, with an additional 6 h of cooling in the chamber before distillation [45]. More recently, productivity has been increased through continuous fermentation and use of whey concentrate as feedstock.
Now, the Kluyveromyces yeast can mediate lactose fermentation into ethanol because they harbor genes for both lactose permease and β-galactosidase. Among these species, the physiological and molecular characteristics of K. lactis have been widely studied as a model for “non-conventional yeasts” in comparative analyses with S. cerevisiae [46][47]. K. lactis has been used as a progenitor for other strains due to its ability to efficiently utilize the lactose in concentrated cheese whey permeate as a raw material for producing ethanol in static cultures [10]. Apart from applications in ethanol production, K. lactis strains are commonly used to produce β-galactosidase [48][49][50][51]. However, this species is generally considered suitable for industrial applications requiring high production and secretion of metabolites or heterologously expressed proteins in a Crabtree-negative dependent manner [52][53][54][55][56][57].
K. marxianus, a closely related species to K. lactis, has been adopted by several industries due to some useful features that are absent in K. lactis [58][59]. Like S. cerevisae, K. marxianus is a respiro-fermentative yeast that can generate energy either via oxidative phosphorylation and the TCA cycle or by fermentation to ethanol. Thus, K. marixianus is frequently used for ethanol production. Several studies have sought to optimize the utilization of lactose in deproteinized whey, cheese whey powder (CWP), cheese whey permeate, and cheese whey in batch and/or continuous mode fermentations [60][61][62][63][64][65][66]. In addition, K. marixianus can grow and ferment at elevated temperatures, enabling cost savings in ethanol production bioprocesses [67][68]. Notably, some strains of K. marixianus are reported to be highly thermotolerant, growing at 43 °C under aerobic conditions with lactose and/or whey permeate as the sole carbon source [67][69]. However, K. marxianus is characteristically Crabtree-negative, and its ethanol yields are typically lower than those of S. cerevisiae [69][70].

3. Strategies for Conferring Lactose Utilization to S. cerevisiae

3.1. Pre-Hydrolysis of Extracellular Lactose for S. cerevisiae Utilization

Lactose hydrolysis in whey fermentation results in a mixture of glucose and galactose, which can then be taken up by S. cerevisiae and fermented into ethanol. Three approaches to extracellular lactose hydrolysis have been established:
First, β-galactosidase can be used to hydrolyze lactose into galactose and glucose, which can then be utilized for ethanol production [71]. However, the presence of glucose induces feedback repression of galactose utilization in S. cerevisiae, resulting in assimilation of the produced ethanol, lower biomass, and diauxic growth.
Second, β-galactosidase and/or S. cerevisiae cells can be immobilized to produce ethanol [72][73][74]. Through immobilization, the cell densities are higher and thus easier to clear from the medium, thereby reducing the cost of removing cells before distillation. Immobilization can also facilitate simplification of the fermentation process, thus further saving equipment and operating costs. Similarly, strains of S. cerevisiae have been developed to ferment a wider range of substrates for combined fermentations, such as whey mixed with cellulosic biomass, by engineering the expression of recombinant cellulolytic proteins anchored or immobilized on the extracellular surface of the plasma membrane along with β-galactosidase [75]. Substantial research efforts have also been committed to developing the substrate for enzyme or cell immobilization and surfactants for improving enzymatic activity, such as silicon dioxide-based nanoparticles, magnetic polysiloxane–polyvinyl alcohol (mPOS–PVA), polymeric supports, and Triton X-100 [76][77][78]. However, immobilization strategies are accompanied by some disadvantages, especially catabolite repression by glucose after lactose hydrolysis and subsequent diauxic growth of the yeast. This lag in lactose fermentation following glucose depletion extends the fermentation time and increases the cost of fermentation.
Third, co-immobilization or co-culture of S. cerevisiae with other microorganisms, which secrete extracellular β-galactosidase, can facilitate lactose fermentation by S. cerevisiae, thus enhancing ethanol yields and shortening fermentation time. Co-immobilization of the two yeasts has been demonstrated to increase the percentage of theoretical yield over that of monocultures and enhance the overall volumetric productivity. In addition, immobilized co-cultures are reportedly more effective than suspension cultures for high-temperature ethanol fermentations [79][80][81][82][83][84].

3.2. Protoplast Fusions of S. cerevisiae and Kluyveromyces spp.

Protoplast fusion, a part of evolutionary engineering, has a great potential for genetic analysis and strain improvement. It breaks down the barriers to genetic exchange imposed by conventional mating systems. It can serve the purpose of developing a strain with mixed substrate fermentation abilities [85][86][87]. This technique is generally applied for developing inter specific, intra specific and inter generic, intra generic supra hybrids with higher capability. It is a significant tool for genetic manipulation as it resolves the barrier to genetic exchange imposed by conventional mating systems. It is particularly useful for industrially important microorganisms [87]. Although S. cerevisiae cannot utilize lactose, it is tolerant of ethanol and exhibits higher productivity than other fermentation species, making it the most reliable option for ethanol production. In order to enhance production by combining the characteristics of ethanol tolerance and lactose utilization in a single strain, hybrid strains of S. cerevisiae and Kluyveromyces spp. can be generated through protoplast fusion [88][89][90]. For example, Guo et al. obtained a stable hybrid of K. marxianus with an S. cerevisiae, showing higher lactose utilization rates and ethanol productivity than the parent strain [89]. Krishnamoorthy and colleagues constructed a hybrid using a temperature-tolerant S. cerevisiae with K. marxianus that resulted in a 12.5% increase in ethanol productivity at 42 °C [88]. Similarly, Xin generated an S. cerevisiae–K. marxianus fusion strain with higher lactose fermentation rates and ethanol tolerance than that of the K. marxianus parental strain, most likely due to its elevated production of linoleic acid and other unsaturated fatty acids [91]. It should be noted that hybridization can increase the amount of chromosomal DNA in each cell [88][89].

3.3. Exogenous Expression of the Lactose Hydrolase Gene in S. cerevisiae

One robust approach for increasing the range of sugar substrates for S. cerevisiae fermentation is through the transgenic expression of lactose hydrolysis enzymes from other lactose-consuming microbes. S. cerevisiae can thus be metabolically engineered to consume lactose through amplification, cloning, and the introduction of naturally occurring genes or pathways that mediate its uptake and catabolism. The majority of lactose utilization genes used in yeast have been obtained from either Escherichia coli, Kluyveromyces species, or the filamentous fungus A. niger.

3.3.1. Lactose Metabolism Genes from E. coli

In E. coli, three genes are required for the uptake and metabolism of lactose and related sugars, including lacZ, lacY, and lacA [92][93][94]. lacZ encodes β-galactosidase, which converts lactose into allolactose and subsequent metabolic intermediates. LacY encodes the lactose permease (LacY) transporter, which mediates lactose uptake into the cell. In order to ensure that S. cerevisiae, a eukaryote, can successfully express the prokaryotic lacZ, the yeast promoter CYC1 is typically fused to lacZ prior to its transformation into yeast. Since lacZ expression is repressed by glucose, an additional ~300 nucleotide DNA fragment is also fused to the expression construct upstream of CYC1 to drive β-galactosidase expression in the presence of glucose in S. cerevisiae [95]. However, although lacZ expression was not repressed by glucose in these yeast transformants harboring CYC1-lacZ, they were still unable to utilize lactose because they lacked the E. coli lactose transport system and therefore could not import lactose to the cytosol for access by β-galactosidase.
To overcome this obstacle, researchers sought to engineer the secretion of β-galactosidase into the culture medium. Porro and his coworkers constructed a lactose-consuming S. cerevisiae strain that overexpressed the lacZ gene from E. coli and then relied on lysis of the older mother cells to release the recombinant β-galactosidase. Cell lysis was induced by overexpression of the transcriptional activator GAL4. Characterization of the fermentation properties of the transformed yeast strains indicated that β-galactosidase released in cell lysates enabled growth on lactose as a sole carbon source or in medium containing whey as growth substrate. Furthermore, these strains were found to efficiently produce ethanol during the stationary culture phase following growth on lactose medium [96]. Martegani and coworkers found that cell lysis was independent of heterologous LacZ expression in the mother cells [97]. As suggested above, GAL4 overexpression was proposed as the causative factor in mother cell lysis since the high accumulation of Gal4p can alter regulatory pathways that affect the composition and structural integrity of cell walls, ultimately leading to lysis in older cells. In addition, Gal4p participates in the repression of galactose utilization in the presence of glucose, and excess Gal4p levels have been shown to possibly mediate concurrent glucose and galactose consumption in the lacZ-expressing yeast.

3.3.2. The Lactose Metabolism Genes from A. niger

A. niger can utilize an exceptionally broad spectrum of carbon substrates and is known to secrete numerous glycoproteins, including β-galactosidase, which enables hydrolysis of lactose in acid whey [98]. A lactose-consuming S. cerevisiae strain was constructed through the expression of A. niger cDNA encoding secreted β-galactosidase. The lacA gene (which encodes β-galactosidase in A. niger), including its N-terminal signal sequence that directed its extracellular secretion, was inserted between the alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH1) promoter and a transcriptional terminator to construct the pVK1.1 vector construct [99]. The pVK1.1 plasmid was then transformed into S. cerevisiae resulting in β-galactosidase overexpression. Although the transformant could hydrolyze lactose, the generation time was 8 h in lactose minimal medium. However, the plasmid exhibited high stability, and 84% of the cells still contained the plasmid after nine doublings on whey permeate medium [99]. Ramakrishnan studied the fermentation properties of the transformants, GRF167(pVK1.1). The transformant can hydrolyze the lactose in the medium, and the glucose and galactose from lactose can be utilized at the same time [100]. In addition, a polyploidy distiller’s yeast transformed the same plasmid to obtain a lactose-consuming strain, and the transformants display a higher lactose hydrolysis rate with a simultaneous uptake of glucose and galactose. In addition, the ethanol yield of the transformants is 90.16% the theoretical yield in lactose YP medium; however, the stability of the plasmid is poor, as, during fermentation, only about 10% of the cells retain the plasmid [100].
A lactose-consuming flocculent brewer’s yeast, W204-FLO1L(INT)/pLD1, was constructed through heterologous expression of lacA on the pVK1.1 plasmid, the CUP1 copper resistance marker used to screen successful transformants. The transgenic yeast cells were able to use lactose with no obvious impact on flocculability [101]. Domingues and coworkers used a flocculent uracil auxotrophy mutant of S. cerevisiae carrying pVK1.1 as a parent strain to construct a flocculent lactose-consuming strain, NCYC869-A3/pVK1.1 [102]. The recombinant yeast exhibited high extracellular β-galactosidase activity. Although galactose uptake was at least partially repressed by glucose in this strain, the strain showed a lactose uptake rate close to 1.7 g/L/h and with ethanol contents close to the maximum theoretical yield [102].

3.3.3. The Lactose Metabolism Genes from Kluyveromyces spp.

Different from A. niger, which breaks down lactose in the extracellular space, yeast in the genus Kluyveromyces transports lactose into the cell for metabolism. Therefore, a lactose permease is needed to access the substrate in addition to the lactose hydrolase. The lactose hydrolase, i.e., β-galactosidase, is encoded by the LAC4 gene, while the lactose permease is encoded by the LAC12 gene. Since Kluyveromyces is relatively close to S. cerevisiae, phylogenetically, the eukaryotic lactose transport system from Kluyveromyces is more compatible with S. cerevisiae regulatory mechanisms. Thus, S. cerevisiae can be engineered to grow on lactose through the simultaneous expression of lactose permease and non-secreted β-galactosidase from Kluyveromyces.
Sreekrishna was the first to construct Lac+ S. cerevisiae strains using a shuttle vector carrying a 13 kb region of the K. lactis genome [103]. The 13 kb region contained LAC4 and a flanking upstream sequence from K. lactis. Despite the low lactose uptake rate in transformants, these uptake assays confirmed that the lactose permease gene, LAC12, was contained in that flanking sequence from K. lactis, between 2.0 and 8.6 kb upstream of LAC4. That study represented the first report of heterologous expression of a eukaryotic membrane-bound permease, which laid a foundation for the subsequent cloning of lactose permease and lactose hydrolase genes from K. lactis [103]. In order to improve the lactose uptake rate and increase the mitotic stability of the heterologous construct, researchers then created the MRY276 yeast strain by inserting the LAC4 and LAC12 genes from K. lactis, under the control of the CYC1-GAL galactose-inducible promoter, into the RDN1 (ribosomal DNA) locus [104]. MRY276, which harbored multiple copies of both LAC4 and LAC12, retained the Lac+ phenotype for longer than 60 generations in growth on non-selective medium, although it exhibited slow growth. The suboptimal growth characteristics of this strain were likely attributable to the burden imposed by overexpression of these transgenes. To resolve this issue, transgenic MRY276 was crossed with wild-type strains to yield meiotic segregants with faster growth and the capacity for lactose assimilation, such as the diploid strain MRY286 [104]. However, this strain showed low ethanol production but high biomass production on lactose minimal medium.
Domingues constructed the Lac+ flocculent S. cerevisiae strain, T1, that expressed LAC4 and LAC12 from K. marxianus rather than K. lactis [105]. The T1 strain showed a lower capacity for flocculation than that of the parent strain but showed a doubling time of 5 h, which was substantially faster than the 6.7 h reported for the original Lac+ strain constructed by Sreekrishna and Dickson [103], but slower than the K. marxianus donor of the LAC4 and LAC12 genes. However, after an adaptation period, where the strain was kept in liquid lactose medium, refreshed periodically, fermentation assays indicated that T1 could metabolize ~90 g/l lactose in liquid medium, thus highlighting increases in rates of both biomass accumulation and ethanol production from lactose.
In general, the use of a lactose-consuming strain for direct fermentation of whey to produce ethanol is not economically feasible because the low lactose content in whey results in low ethanol titer (i.e., 2–3% v/v). Therefore, fermentation should begin with concentrated whey to obtain high ethanol yields at the end of the process, which also requires high tolerance to ethanol and osmotic pressure. In S. cerevisiae, the accumulation of trehalose is widely considered a critical determinant for the improvement of stress tolerance in yeast, and the deletion of the trehalose degrading enzyme gene can significantly increase intracellular trehalose content [106].
In particular, a neutral cytosolic trehalase (NTH1) and an acidic vacuolar trehalase (ATH1) have been identified as the main trehalose hydrolases in S. cerevisiae [107][108]. In order to obtain a Lac+ S. cerevisiae strain that tolerates high sugar and ethanol conditions associated with concentrated whey fermentation, the ΔathΔnth Lac+ strain AY-51024A was generated, which expressed the permease and β-galactosidase genes from K. marxianus [109]. In this strain, the ATH1 and NTH1 loci were used as the target regions for integrating the LAC4 and LAC12 genes driven by the PGK1 promoter. AY-51024A showed roughly equal β-galactosidase activity during growth on different carbon sources and exhibited high tolerance to ethanol, and could withstand higher osmotic pressure than the parent strain. In addition, it showed an almost equal rate of glucose uptake and a higher rate of galactose uptake than its parent strain, AY-5. However, this transgenic strain was subject to glucose repression, and lactose uptake rates were very slow in lactose medium (0.98 g lactose/g cell/h). Further analysis confirmed that glucose repression of lactose/galactose metabolism was responsible for the slower lactose uptake rather than the result of low copy number of LAC4 and LAC12 [109].

References

  1. Szczerba, H.; Komoń-Janczara, E.; Dudziak, K.; Waśko, A.; Targoński, Z. A novel biocatalyst, Enterobacter aerogenes LU2, for efficient production of succinic acid using whey permeate as a cost-effective carbon source. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2020, 13, 96.
  2. Alvarez-Guzmán, C.L.; Cisneros-de la Cueva, S.; Balderas-Hernández, V.E.; Smoliński, A.; De León-Rodríguez, A. Biohydrogen production from cheese whey powder by Enterobacter asburiae: Effect of operating conditions on hydrogen yield and chemometric study of the fermentative metabolites. Energy Rep. 2020, 6, 1170–1180.
  3. Rao, R.; Basak, N. Optimization and modelling of dark fermentative hydrogen production from cheese whey by Enterobacter aerogenes 2822. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 1777–1800.
  4. Lee, J.S.; Hyun, I.K.; Yoon, J.-W.; Seo, H.-J.; Kang, S.-S. Bioconversion products of whey by lactic acid bacteria exert anti-adipogenic effect. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2021, 41, 145.
  5. Brown, K.; Harrison, J.; Bowers, K. Production of oxalic acid from Aspergillus niger and whey permeate. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2018, 229, 5.
  6. Chroumpi, T.; Martínez-Reyes, N.; Kun, R.S.; Peng, M.; Lipzen, A.; Ng, V.; Tejomurthula, S.; Zhang, Y.; Grigoriev, I.V.; Mäkelä, M.R.; et al. Detailed analysis of the D-galactose catabolic pathways in Aspergillus niger reveals complexity at both metabolic and regulatory level. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2022, 159, 103670.
  7. Fischer, C.; Kleinschmidt, T. Synthesis of galactooligosaccharides by Cryptococcus laurentii and Aspergillus oryzae using different kinds of acid whey. Int. Dairy J. 2021, 112, 104867.
  8. Pirayre, A.; Duval, L.; Blugeon, C.; Firmo, C.; Perrin, S.; Jourdier, E.; Margeot, A.; Bidard, F. Glucose-lactose mixture feeds in industry-like conditions: A gene regulatory network analysis on the hyperproducing Trichoderma reesei strain Rut-C30. BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 885.
  9. Zhang, J.; Chen, Y.; Wu, C.; Liu, P.; Wang, W.; Wei, D. The transcription factor ACE3 controls cellulase activities and lactose metabolism via two additional regulators in the fungus Trichoderma reesei. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 18435–18450.
  10. Sampaio, F.C.; de Faria, J.T.; da Silva, M.F.; de Souza Oliveira, R.P.; Converti, A. Cheese whey permeate fermentation by Kluyveromyces lactis: A combined approach to wastewater treatment and bioethanol production. Environ. Technol. 2020, 41, 3210–3218.
  11. Xia, J.; He, J.; Xu, J.; Liu, X.; Qiu, Z.; Xu, N.; Su, L. Direct conversion of cheese whey to polymalic acid by mixed culture of Aureobasidium pullulans and permeabilized Kluyveromyces marxianus. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 337, 125443.
  12. Oliveira, D.R.; Lopes, A.C.A.; Pereira, R.A.; Cardoso, P.G.; Duarte, W.F. Selection of potentially probiotic Kluyveromyces lactis for the fermentation of cheese whey–based beverage. Ann. Microbiol. 2019, 69, 1361–1372.
  13. Zou, G.; Jiang, Y.P.; Liu, R.; Zhu, Z.H.; Zhou, Z.H. The putative beta-glucosidase BGL3I regulates cellulase induction in Trichoderma reesei. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2018, 11, 14.
  14. Zhang, J.J.; Zhang, G.X.; Wang, W.; Wei, D.Z. Enhanced cellulase production in Trichoderma reesei RUT C30 via constitution of minimal transcriptional activators. Microb. Cell Factories 2018, 17, 14.
  15. Harrison, M.-C.; LaBella, A.L.; Hittinger, C.T.; Rokas, A. The evolution of the GALactose utilization pathway in budding yeasts. Trends Genet. 2021, 38, 97–106.
  16. Sunwoo, I.Y.; Sukwong, P.; Park, Y.R.; Jeong, D.Y.; Kim, S.R.; Jeong, G.-T.; Kim, S.-K. Enhancement of galactose uptake from Kappaphycus alvarezii hydrolysate using Saccharomyces cerevisiae through overexpression of Leloir pathway genes. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2021, 193, 335–348.
  17. Wang, H.; Sun, T.; Zhao, Z.; Gu, S.; Liu, Q.; Wu, T.; Wang, D.; Tian, C.; Li, J. Transcriptional profiling of Myceliophthora thermophila on galactose and metabolic engineering for improved galactose utilization. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 664011.
  18. Varela, J.A.; Montini, N.; Scully, D.; Van der Ploeg, R.; Oreb, M.; Boles, E.; Hirota, J.; Akada, R.; Hoshida, H.; Morrissey, J.P. Polymorphisms in the LAC12 gene explain lactose utilisation variability in Kluyveromyces marxianus strains. FEMS Yeast Res. 2017, 17, 3.
  19. Karim, A.; Gerliani, N.; Aïder, M. Kluyveromyces marxianus: An emerging yeast cell factory for applications in food and biotechnology. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 333, 108818.
  20. Zhou, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Dai, L.; Men, Y.; Wu, J.; Zhang, J.; Sun, Y. Efficiency analysis and mechanism Insight of that whole-cell biocatalytic production of melibiose from raffinose with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2017, 181, 407–423.
  21. Álvarez Cao, M.E.; Cerdán, M.E.; González Siso, M.I.; Becerra, M. Optimization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae α-galactosidase production and application in the degradation of raffinose family oligosaccharides. Microb. Cell Factories 2019, 18, 172.
  22. Sukwong, P.; Sunwoo, I.Y.; Jeong, D.Y.; Kim, S.R.; Jeong, G.-T.; Kim, S.-K. Improvement of bioethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae through the deletion of GLK1, MIG1 and MIG2 and overexpression of PGM2 using the red seaweed Gracilaria verrucosa. Process. Biochem. 2020, 89, 134–145.
  23. Oh, E.J.; Jin, Y.-S. Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient fermentation of cellulose. FEMS Yeast Res. 2020, 20, foz089.
  24. Sukwong, P.; Sunwoo, I.Y.; Jeong, D.Y.; Kim, S.R.; Jeong, G.-T.; Kim, S.-K. Enhancement of bioethanol production from Gracilaria verrucosa by Saccharomyces cerevisiae through the overexpression of SNR84 and PGM2. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2019, 42, 1421–1433.
  25. da Silveira, F.A.; Diniz, R.H.S.; Sampaio, G.; Brandão, R.L.; da Silveira, W.B.; Castro, I.M. Sugar transport systems in Kluyveromyces marxianus CCT 7735. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 2019, 112, 211–223.
  26. Choudhury, B.I.; Whiteway, M. Evolutionary transition of GAL regulatory circuit from generalist to specialist function in ascomycetes. Trends Microbiol. 2018, 26, 692–702.
  27. Zhou, P.; Fang, X.; Xu, N.; Yao, Z.; Xie, W.; Ye, L. Development of a Highly efficient copper-inducible GAL regulation system (CuIGR) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. ACS Synth. Biol. 2021, 10, 3435–3444.
  28. Zhou, P.; Xu, N.; Yang, Z.; Du, Y.; Yue, C.; Xu, N.; Ye, L. Directed evolution of the transcription factor Gal4 for development of an improved transcriptional regulation system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2020, 142, 109675.
  29. Lavy, T.; Kumar, P.R.; He, H.; Joshua-Tor, L. The Gal3p transducer of the GAL regulon interacts with the Gal80p repressor in its ligand-induced closed conformation. Genes Dev. 2012, 26, 294–303.
  30. Lavy, T.; Yanagida, H.; Tawfik, D.S. Gal3 binds Gal80 tighter than Gal1 indicating adaptive protein changes following duplication. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 472–477.
  31. Pannala, V.R.; Bhat, P.J.; Bhartiya, S.; Venkatesh, K. Systems biology of GAL regulon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 2010, 2, 98–106.
  32. Anders, A.; Breunig, K.D. Evolutionary aspects of a genetic network: Studying the lactose/galactose regulon of Kluyveromyces lactis. In Yeast Genetic Networks, 1st ed.; Becskei, A., Ed.; Humana Press: Clifton, NJ, USA, 2011; Volume 73, pp. 259–277.
  33. Pannala, V.R.; Ahammed Sherief, K.; Bhartiya, S.; Venkatesh, K. Dynamic analysis of the KlGAL regulatory system in Kluyveromyces lactis: A comparative study with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Syst. Synth. Biol. 2011, 5, 69–85.
  34. Kayikci, Ö.; Nielsen, J. Glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015, 15, fov068.
  35. Alipourfard, I.; Datukishvili, N.; Bakhtiyari, S.; Haghani, K.; Di Renzo, L.; de Miranda, R.C.; Mikeladze, D. MIG1 glucose repression in metabolic processes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Genetics to metabolic engineering. Avicenna J. Med. Biotechnol. 2019, 11, 215–220.
  36. Lettow, J.; Aref, R.; Schüller, H.-J. Transcriptional repressor Gal80 recruits corepressor complex Cyc8–Tup1 to structural genes of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL regulon. Curr. Genet. 2022, 68, 115–124.
  37. Quarterman, J.; Skerker, J.M.; Feng, X.; Liu, I.Y.; Zhao, H.; Arkin, A.P.; Jin, Y.-S. Rapid and efficient galactose fermentation by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 229, 13–21.
  38. Lin, X. The regulation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Snf1 protein kinase on glucose utilization is in a glucose-dependent manner. Curr. Genet. 2021, 67, 245–248.
  39. Shymansky, C.M.; Wang, G.; Baidoo, E.E.; Gin, J.; Apel, A.R.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; García Martín, H.; Keasling, J.D. Flux-enabled exploration of the role of Sip1 in galactose yeast metabolism. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2017, 5, 31.
  40. Rogosa, M.; Browne, H.; Whittier, E. Ethyl alcohol from whey. J. Dairy Sci. 1947, 30, 263–269.
  41. Browne, H. Ethyl alcohol from fermentation of lactose in whey. Chem. Eng. News 1941, 19, 1272–1273.
  42. Whittier, E.O. Lactose and its utilization: A review. J. Dairy Sci. 1944, 27, 505–537.
  43. Lyons, T.; Cunningham, J. Fuel alcohol from whey. Am. Dairy Rev. 1980, 42, 42A.
  44. Maddox, I.S.; Gutierrez, N.A. Biotechnological developments in New Zealand. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 1996, 16, 119–143.
  45. Ling, K.C. Whey to Ethanol: A Biofuel Role for Dairy Cooperatives? Rural Business and Cooperative Programs 2008; USDA Rural Development: Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
  46. Breunig, K.; Bolotin-Fukuhara, M.; Bianchi, M.; Bourgarel, D.; Falcone, C.; Ferrero, I.; Frontali, L.; Goffrini, P.; Krijger, J.; Mazzoni, C.; et al. Regulation of primary carbon metabolism in Kluyveromyces lactis. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2000, 26, 771–780.
  47. Schaffrath, R.; Breunig, K.D. Genetics and molecular physiology of the yeast Kluyveromyces lactis. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2000, 30, 173–190.
  48. Wellenbeck, W.; Mampel, J.; Naumer, C.; Knepper, A.; Neubauer, P. Fast-track development of a lactase production process with Kluyveromyces lactis by a progressive parameter-control workflow. Eng. Life Sci. 2017, 17, 1185–1194.
  49. Rico-Díaz, A.; Álvarez-Cao, M.-E.; Escuder-Rodríguez, J.-J.; González-Siso, M.-I.; Cerdán, M.E.; Becerra, M. Rational mutagenesis by engineering disulphide bonds improves Kluyveromyces lactis beta-galactosidase for high-temperature industrial applications. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 45535.
  50. De Freitas, M.d.F.M.; Hortêncio, L.C.; de Albuquerque, T.L.; Rocha, M.V.P.; Gonçalves, L.R.B. Simultaneous hydrolysis of cheese whey and lactulose production catalyzed by β-galactosidase from Kluyveromyces lactis NRRL Y1564. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2020, 43, 711–722.
  51. Lima, P.C.; Gazoni, I.; de Carvalho, A.M.G.; Bresolin, D.; Cavalheiro, D.; de Oliveira, D.; Rigo, E. β-galactosidase from Kluyveromyces lactis in genipin-activated chitosan: An investigation on immobilization, stability, and application in diluted UHT milk. Food Chem. 2021, 349, 129050.
  52. Pandey, R.; Veeranki, V.D. Optimizing secretory expression of recombinant human interferon gamma from Kluyveromyces lactis. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2018, 48, 202–212.
  53. Spohner, S.C.; Schaum, V.; Quitmann, H.; Czermak, P. Kluyveromyces lactis: An emerging tool in biotechnology. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 222, 104–116.
  54. Madhavan, A.; Sukumaran, R.K. Signal peptides from filamentous fungi efficiently mediate the secretion of recombinant proteins in Kluyveromyces lactis. Biochem. Eng. J. 2015, 102, 31–37.
  55. Madhavan, A.; Sukumaran, R.K. Secreted expression of an active human interferon-beta (HuIFNβ) in Kluyveromyces lactis. Eng. Life Sci. 2016, 16, 379–385.
  56. Ceylan, H.K.; Tayhan, S.E.; Gökçe, İ. Secretory Expression of Human Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF 165) in Kluyveromyces lactis and Characterization of Its Biological Activity. Int. J. Pept. Res. Ther. 2021, 27, 1989–2001.
  57. Tamshybay, A. Features of Kluyveromyces lactis expression system. In Proceedings of the European Scientific Conference, Penza, Russia, 7 October 2020.
  58. Lane, M.M.; Burke, N.; Karreman, R.; Wolfe, K.H.; O’Byrne, C.P.; Morrissey, J.P. Physiological and metabolic diversity in the yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 2011, 100, 507–519.
  59. Pentjuss, A.; Stalidzans, E.; Liepins, J.; Kokina, A.; Martynova, J.; Zikmanis, P.; Mozga, I.; Scherbaka, R.; Hartman, H.; Poolman, M.G.; et al. Model-based biotechnological potential analysis of Kluyveromyces marxianus central metabolism. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 44, 1177–1190.
  60. Silveira, W.; Passos, F.; Mantovani, H.; Passos, F. Ethanol production from cheese whey permeate by Kluyveromyces marxianus UFV-3: A flux analysis of oxido-reductive metabolism as a function of lactose concentration and oxygen levels. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2005, 36, 930–936.
  61. Das, B.; Sarkar, S.; Maiti, S.; Bhattacharjee, S. Studies on production of ethanol from cheese whey using Kluyveromyces marxianus. Mater. Today Proc. 2016, 3, 3253–3257.
  62. Christensen, A.D.; Kádár, Z.; Oleskowicz-Popiel, P.; Thomsen, M.H. Production of bioethanol from organic whey using Kluyveromyces marxianus. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 38, 283–289.
  63. Murari, C.S.; Machado, W.R.C.; Schuina, G.L.; Del Bianchi, V.L. Optimization of bioethanol production from cheese whey using Kluyveromyces marxianus URM 7404. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2019, 20, 101182.
  64. Zoppellari, F.; Bardi, L. Production of bioethanol from effluents of the dairy industry by Kluyveromyces marxianus. New Biotechnol. 2013, 30, 607–613.
  65. Saini, P.; Beniwal, A.; Kokkiligadda, A.; Vij, S. Evolutionary adaptation of Kluyveromyces marxianus strain for efficient conversion of whey lactose to bioethanol. Process Biochem. 2017, 62, 69–79.
  66. Tesfaw, A.; Oner, E.T.; Assefa, F. Evaluating crude whey for bioethanol production using non-Saccharomyces yeast, Kluyveromyces marxianus. SN Appl. Sci. 2021, 3, 1–8.
  67. Diniz, R.H.S.; Villada, J.C.; Alvim, M.C.T.; Vidigal, P.M.P.; Vieira, N.M.; Lamas-Maceiras, M.; Cerdán, M.E.; González-Siso, M.-I.; Lahtvee, P.-J.; da Silveira, W.B. Transcriptome analysis of the thermotolerant yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus CCT 7735 under ethanol stress. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 6969–6980.
  68. Wang, D.; Wu, D.; Yang, X.; Hong, J. Transcriptomic analysis of thermotolerant yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus in multiple inhibitors tolerance. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 14177–14192.
  69. Sivarathnakumar, S.; Jayamuthunagai, J.; Baskar, G.; Praveenkumar, R.; Selvakumari, I.A.E.; Bharathiraja, B. Bioethanol production from woody stem Prosopis juliflora using thermo tolerant yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus and its kinetics studies. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 293, 122060.
  70. Ha-Tran, D.M.; Nguyen, T.T.M.; Huang, C.-C. Kluyveromyces marxianus: Current state of omics studies, strain improvement strategy and potential industrial implementation. Fermentation 2020, 6, 124.
  71. Boudjema, K.; Fazouane-Naimi, F.; Hellal, A. Optimization of the bioethanol production on sweet cheese whey by Saccharomyces cerevisiae DIV13-Z087C0VS using response surface methodology (RSM). Rom. Biotechnol. Lett. 2015, 20, 10814–10825.
  72. Kokkiligadda, A.; Beniwal, A.; Saini, P.; Vij, S. Utilization of cheese whey using synergistic immobilization of β-galactosidase and Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells in dual matrices. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2016, 179, 1469–1484.
  73. Kisielewska, M. Ultrasonic stimulation of co-immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells and β-galactosidase enzyme for enhanced ethanol production from whey ultrafiltration permeate. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2012, 21, 387–393.
  74. Panagopoulos, V.; Dima, A.; Boura, K.; Bosnea, L.; Nigam, P.S.; Kanellaki, M.; Koutinas, A.A. Cell factory models of non-engineered S. cerevisiae containing lactase in a second layer for lactose fermentation in one batch. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2021, 145, 109750.
  75. Cunha, J.T.; Gomes, D.G.; Romaní, A.; Inokuma, K.; Hasunuma, T.; Kondo, A.; Domingues, L. Cell surface engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for simultaneous valorization of corn cob and cheese whey via ethanol production. Energy Convers. Manag. 2021, 243, 114359.
  76. Neri, D.F.; Balcão, V.M.; Carneiro-da-Cunha, M.G.; Carvalho Jr, L.B.; Teixeira, J.A. Immobilization of β-galactosidase from Kluyveromyces lactis onto a polysiloxane–polyvinyl alcohol magnetic (mPOS–PVA) composite for lactose hydrolysis. Catal. Commun. 2008, 9, 2334–2339.
  77. Beniwal, A.; Saini, P.; Kokkiligadda, A.; Vij, S. Use of silicon dioxide nanoparticles for β-galactosidase immobilization and modulated ethanol production by co-immobilized K. marxianus and S. cerevisiae in deproteinized cheese whey. LWT 2018, 87, 553–561.
  78. Soto, D.; Escobar, S.; Guzmán, F.; Cárdenas, C.; Bernal, C.; Mesa, M. Structure-activity relationships on the study of β-galactosidase folding/unfolding due to interactions with immobilization additives: Triton X-100 and ethanol. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 96, 87–92.
  79. Guo, X.; Zhou, J.; Xiao, D. Improved ethanol production by mixed immobilized cells of Kluyveromyces marxianus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae from cheese whey powder solution fermentation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2010, 160, 532–538.
  80. Eiadpum, A.; Limtong, S.; Phisalaphong, M. High-temperature ethanol fermentation by immobilized coculture of Kluyveromyces marxianus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2012, 114, 325–329.
  81. Magalhatilde, K.T.; Rodrigues, A.K.; Gervasio, I.M.; Gervasio, I.; Schwan, R.F. Ethanol production from deproteinized cheese whey fermentations by co-cultures of Kluyveromyces marxianus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2013, 7, 1121–1127.
  82. Farkas, C.; Rezessy-Szabó, J.M.; Gupta, V.K.; Bujna, E.; Pham, T.M.; Pásztor-Huszár, K.; Friedrich, L.; Bhat, R.; Thakur, V.K.; Nguyen, Q.D. Batch and fed-batch ethanol fermentation of cheese-whey powder with mixed cultures of different yeasts. Energies 2019, 12, 4495.
  83. Gabardo, S.; Pereira, G.F.; Klein, M.P.; Rech, R.; Hertz, P.F.; Ayub, M.A.Z. Dynamics of yeast immobilized-cell fluidized-bed bioreactors systems in ethanol fermentation from lactose-hydrolyzed whey and whey permeate. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2016, 39, 141–150.
  84. Díez-Antolínez, R.; Hijosa-Valsero, M.; Paniagua-García, A.I.; Garita-Cambronero, J.; Gómez, X. Yeast screening and cell immobilization on inert supports for ethanol production from cheese whey permeate with high lactose loads. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0210002.
  85. Jhariya, U.; Dafale, N.A.; Srivastava, S.; Bhende, R.S.; Kapley, A.; Purohit, H.J. Understanding ethanol tolerance mechanism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to enhance the bioethanol production: Current and future prospects. BioEnergy Res. 2021, 14, 670–688.
  86. Xin, Y.; Yang, M.; Yin, H.; Yang, J. Improvement of ethanol tolerance by inactive protoplast fusion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 1979318.
  87. Lalithakumari, D. Fungal Protoplast: A Biotechnological Tool, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; pp. 127–154.
  88. Krishnamoorthy, R.N.; Vijila, K.; Kumutha, K. Intergeneric protoplast fusion of yeast for high ethanol production from cheese industry waste Whey. J. Yeast Fungal Res. 2010, 1, 81–87.
  89. Guo, X.; Wang, R.; Chen, Y.; Xiao, D. Intergeneric yeast fusants with efficient ethanol production from cheese whey powder solution: Construction of a Kluyveromyces marxianus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae AY-5 hybrid. Eng. Life Sci. 2012, 12, 656–661.
  90. Sharma, S.; Arora, A.; Paul, D. Protoplast fusion of yeast strains for strain improvement to enhance mixed substrate utilization range. In Biotechnology and Biological Sciences, 1st ed.; Sen, S., Mukherjee, S., Paul, R., Narula, R., Eds.; CRC Press: London, UK, 2019; pp. 333–336.
  91. Ryu, Y.-W.; Jang, H.-W.; Lee, H.-S. Enhancement of ethanol tolerance of lactose assimilating yeast strain by protoplast fusion. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1991, 1, 151–156.
  92. Ozbudak, E.M.; Thattai, M.; Lim, H.N.; Shraiman, B.I.; Van Oudenaarden, A. Multistability in the lactose utilization network of Escherichia coli. Nature 2004, 427, 737–740.
  93. Beckwith, J.R. Regulation of the Lac Operon: Recent studies on the regulation of lactose metabolism in Escherichia coli support the operon model. Science 1967, 156, 597–604.
  94. Ammar, E.M.; Wang, X.; Rao, C.V. Regulation of metabolism in Escherichia coli during growth on mixtures of the non-glucose sugars: Arabinose, lactose, and xylose. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 609.
  95. Guarente, L.; Ptashne, M. Fusion of Escherichia coli lacZ to the cytochrome c gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1981, 78, 2199–2203.
  96. Porro, D.; Martegani, E.; Ranzi, B.M.; Alberghina, L. Lactose/whey utilization and ethanol production by transformed Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1992, 39, 799–805.
  97. Martegani, E.; Brambilla, L.; Porro, D.; Ranzi, B.M.; Alberghina, L. Alteration of cell population structure due to cell lysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells overexpressing the GAL4 gene. Yeast 1993, 9, 575–582.
  98. Show, P.L.; Oladele, K.O.; Siew, Q.Y.; Aziz Zakry, F.A.; Lan, J.C.-W.; Ling, T.C. Overview of citric acid production from Aspergillus niger. Front. Life Sci 2015, 8, 271–283.
  99. Banjoko, I.O.; Adeyanju, M.M.; Ademuyiwa, O.; Adebawo, O.O. Hypolipidemic effects of lactic acid bacteria fermented cereal in rats. Lipids Health Dis. 2012, 11, 170.
  100. Ramakrishnan, S.; Hartley, B.S. Fermentation of lactose by yeast cells secreting recombinant fungal lactase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1993, 59, 4230–4235.
  101. Domingues, L.; Onnela, M.-L.; Teixeira, J.; Lima, N.; Penttilä, M. Construction of a flocculent brewer’s yeast strain secreting Aspergillus niger β-galactosidase. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000, 54, 97–103.
  102. Domingues, L.; Teixeira, J.; Penttilä, M.; Lima, N. Construction of a flocculent Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain secreting high levels of Aspergillus niger β-galactosidase. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 58, 645–650.
  103. Sreekrishna, K.; Dickson, R.C. Construction of strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that grow on lactose. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1985, 82, 7909–7913.
  104. Rubio-Texeira, M.; Castrillo, J.I.; Adam, A.C.; Ugalde, U.O.; Polaina, J. Highly efficient assimilation of lactose by a metabolically engineered strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1998, 14, 827–837.
  105. Domingues, L.; Teixeira, J.; Lima, N. Construction of a flocculent Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermenting lactose. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1999, 51, 621–626.
  106. Divate, N.R.; Chen, G.-H.; Wang, P.-M.; Ou, B.-R.; Chung, Y.-C. Engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improvement in ethanol tolerance by accumulation of trehalose. Bioengineered 2016, 7, 445–458.
  107. Sakaguchi, M. Diverse and common features of trehalases and their contributions to microbial trehalose metabolism. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 1837–1847.
  108. Maicas, S.; Guirao-Abad, J.P.; Argüelles, J.-C. Yeast trehalases: Two enzymes, one catalytic mission. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 1860, 2249–2254.
  109. Zou, J.; Guo, X.; Shen, T.; Dong, J.; Zhang, C.; Xiao, D. Construction of lactose-consuming Saccharomyces cerevisiae for lactose fermentation into ethanol fuel. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 40, 353–363.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Energy & Fuels
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Jing Zou
,
Xuedong Chang
View Times: 1.0K
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 27 Apr 2022
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    ScholarVision Creations
    Feedback