Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 1611 2022-04-13 04:57:16 |
2 Adjust the reference format Meta information modification 1611 2022-04-13 08:21:27 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?


Are you sure to Delete?
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Luo, J.; , .; Luo, Y.; An, P. Lactoferrin and Ferrous Sulfate Supplementation in Iron-Deficiency Anemia. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 13 April 2024).
Luo J,  , Luo Y, An P. Lactoferrin and Ferrous Sulfate Supplementation in Iron-Deficiency Anemia. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed April 13, 2024.
Luo, Junjie, , Yongting Luo, Peng An. "Lactoferrin and Ferrous Sulfate Supplementation in Iron-Deficiency Anemia" Encyclopedia, (accessed April 13, 2024).
Luo, J., , ., Luo, Y., & An, P. (2022, April 13). Lactoferrin and Ferrous Sulfate Supplementation in Iron-Deficiency Anemia. In Encyclopedia.
Luo, Junjie, et al. "Lactoferrin and Ferrous Sulfate Supplementation in Iron-Deficiency Anemia." Encyclopedia. Web. 13 April, 2022.
Lactoferrin and Ferrous Sulfate Supplementation in Iron-Deficiency Anemia

Ferrous sulfate is a commonly used iron supplement for the correction of iron-deficiency anemia but with frequent gastrointestinal side effects. Milk-derived iron-binding glycoprotein lactoferrin possesses well gastrointestinal tolerance and fewer side effects caused by the intake of high-dose iron. However, the underlying mechanism of the iron-enhancing effect of lactoferrin remains unclear. In addition, the comparative efficacies between lactoferrin and ferrous sulfate are also remained to be determined. Studies support lactoferrin as a superior supplement to ferrous sulfate regarding the improvement in serum iron parameters and hemoglobin levels. 

lactoferrin ferrous sulfate iron

1. Introduction

Iron is a necessary trace element for all mammals and involved in many essential metabolic processes such as oxygen transport, mitochondrial respiration and enzymatic activities [1]. Therefore, the deficiency of iron will lead to the metabolic abnormality in all parts of human bodies. The most common manifestations of iron deficiency are fatigue, headache and paleness [2]. Iron deficiency (ID) impairs cardiac function in the elderly and neurocognitive development in infants [1]. Children suffering from severe iron deficiency are associated with cognitive dysplasia, delayed body development, and low productivity [3][4]. The depletion of iron will also restrict hemoglobin synthesis and result in iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) [5][6]. IDA is the unique preventable and theorical easier treatable of the main and more frequent years lived with disabilities (YLDs) in the whole world [7].
Anemia has already become a global public health concern [8]. One in third people worldwide are affected by anemia; pregnant women and children are the most susceptible populations due to the increasing demand of iron for fetus or body development [9]. About half of pregnant women are diagnosed with anemia in low- and middle-income countries [10], and it is estimated that global anemia prevalence is more than 40% in pre-school children [8][11]. Anemia is also the first and main preventable cause of maternal mortality. An analysis of 312,281 pregnancies in 29 countries shows that the odds of maternal death were twice as high in those women with severe anemia compared with those not [12]. According to World Health Organization, 50% of anemia worldwide is caused by iron deficiency. The lack of iron additionally raises the specific risks for the mother and the fetus during pregnancy, such as intra-uterine growth retardation, prematurity, fetoplacental miss ratio and peripartum blood transfusion [13]. Therefore, the reduction of anemia is one of the World Health Assembly Global Nutrition Targets for 2025 and of the Sustainable Development Goals, with the attention to iron supplement and other nutritional needs of adolescent girls, pregnant women and children. However, the global progress in reducing anemia is not on track for reaching the 2025 target [8][14].
Generally, there are 6 “right treatment” guidelines regarding iron supplementation: at the right moment (not only when anemia is present), at the right dose (ensuring efficacy and tolerance of different populations); the right moment (breakfast is not the best meal to intake oral iron considering gastrointestinal reaction); the right route (oral iron is not always the first option, dietetical supplements, fortified powders, delay clamping umbilical cord or intravenous iron administration have respective advantages [4]); the right pharmacology (not all the oral iron are equal, neither the intravenous iron); and the right management (identifying the causes of IDA and the health problem that may weaken the effect of iron supplementation, including obesity/overweight, inflammation, and infection) [15].
There are several approaches for iron supplementation, including dietary or intravenous iron administration. Considering cost-effectiveness and adherence, oral iron ingestion is the main therapy for pregnant women and children with ID or IDA. Oral iron therapies include different iron supplements such as ferrous sulfate, ferrous gluconate and some other iron abundant substances. However, the absorption of iron across intestine epithelium is restricted by ferrous iron ion channel and influenced by body iron needs. Inorganic, non-heme iron from food is absorbed by duodenal enterocytes through divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1), exported by ferroportin (FPN) and bound by transferrin within blood circulation [16]. The major delivery target of transferrin-bound iron is erythroid in the bone marrow, which can acquire transferrin through transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1) on the erythroid cell surface. Senescent erythrocytes will be lysed by macrophages and iron can be recycled into circulation. Excess iron is stored in the liver as ferritin. High level of iron storage will trigger hepcidin gene (HAMP) transcription to block iron absorption from intestine and iron recycling from macrophages [17]. Hepcidin can bind to FPN, trigger the internalization and degradation of FPN, reducing circulating iron level [18][19]. In addition, hepcidin plays an important role in innate immunity. The expression of hepcidin can be induced by inflammatory cytokines during infection, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) [20][21], which is regarded to deprive invading microorganisms of iron. During nutrient scarcity, the microbiota can also compete with their hosts for iron by inhibiting host iron transport and storage [22].
Although the regulatory mechanism of iron absorption, utilization, storage and regulation has been discovered, ferrous sulfate is still a very frequently used oral iron supplement for the correction of ID or IDA, sometimes cooperated with vitamin C as adjuvant therapy. However, ferrous iron supplements frequently lead to serious gastrointestinal side effects such as vomiting, nausea, epigastric discomfort and further results in low patients’ compliance [23]. In recent years, milk-derived iron-binding glycoprotein lactoferrin has been used as iron supplement for the correction of ID/IDA [24][25][26]. Lactoferrin shares structural similarities with transferrin [27]. Lactoferrin displays high iron-binding affinity within a wide range of pH values, and the iron-binding capacity can be maintained after heating [1]. In commercially available lactoferrin, lactoferrin attains 10–20% iron saturation. Due to the iron-binding properties, it proposed that lactoferrin can enhance intestinal iron absorption and improve hemoglobin production [1]. However, the underlying mechanism of the iron-enhancing effect of lactoferrin remains unclear. Lactoferrin is a relatively large protein (~80 kD) that is unlikely to cross blood/gut barrier and directly contribute to iron supplementation [28]. Regarding the comparative efficacy between oral lactoferrin and traditional ferrous sulfate therapy on iron absorption, iron storage, erythropoiesis and inflammation, a high-quality comprehensive assessment is still needed to elucidate the potential mechanism of iron-enhancing effect of lactoferrin.

2. Lactoferrin and Ferrous Sulfate Supplementation in Iron-Deficiency Anemia

Lactoferrin is a multifunctional iron-binding protein possessing anti-inflammatory and anti-microbial effects. The major advantages of lactoferrin compared with traditional iron supplement ferrous sulfate are well gastrointestinal tolerance and fewer side effects caused by the intake of high-dose iron.  Lactoferrin supplementation displayed better improvement for blood iron parameters including serum iron and ferritin when compared with ferrous sulfate. Moreover, a superior erythropoiesis-improving effect was observed in individuals receiving lactoferrin. Participants receiving lactoferrin had reduced IL-6 levels compared with those receiving ferrous sulfate, indicating lactoferrin mitigated inflammation.

Contradictorily, lactoferrin has less FIA than ferrous sulfate based on 3 studies [29][30], suggesting that the iron-improving effect of lactoferrin is not completely brought by the iron within lactoferrin. The lower FIA of lactoferrin is probably due to its iron-binding activity, which sequesters iron rather than promotes iron absorption in the intestine [30]. This hypothesis can be supported by the phenotypes of lactoferrin knockout mice, in which increased serum transferrin saturation and liver iron stores were observed [31]. However, there is an inconsistent explanation about the effect of iron-binding capacity of lactoferrin on iron absorption. It regarded that lactoferrin may sequester dietary iron from binding to iron-chelating compounds in foods (such as polyphenols and phytic acid), which promotes extra iron absorption in foods. This hypothesis can be supported by the results from isotope-labeled iron absorption trial using apo-lactoferrin [30]. Higher FIA was observed in individuals receiving apo-lactoferrin than those who received holo-lactoferrin.

The anti-inflammatory effect of lactoferrin can partially explain why it had a better iron-improving effect even with lower FIA than ferrous sulfate. First, higher inflammatory cytokines will prevent dietary iron absorption and iron mobilization from reticuloendothelial system to meet the need of erythropoiesis because of increased hepcidin synthesis [32][33]. Second, amelioration of inflammation can improve erythropoiesis. Inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 is a repressive factor for erythropoiesis [34] (Figure 1). Notably, the iron-binding capacity also confers lactoferrin the property of limiting the growth of gut pathogens, which requires iron to proliferate. Simultaneously, lactoferrin can also enhance the growth of gut-beneficial microorganisms such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus [35]. These probiotics have been proven to reduce the adverse effects associated with iron supplementation [36][37].

Figure 1. Proposed model describing the iron- and erythropoiesis-improving effects of lactoferrin. Part of the elements in this figure are using resources from Freepik [38] and Servier Medical Art [39] under a Creative Commons Attribution license.
Whether lactoferrin promotes iron status by mitigating inflammation still needs validating in future studies. Inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, CRP and TNF-α should be detected in further trials. With respect to the lower fractional iron absorption of lactoferrin compared with ferrous sulfate, more iron absorption investigations on lactoferrin are required. A critical serum parameter needs detection in future trials is hepcidin, especially considering the essential function of hepcidin in iron metabolism [40]. Currently, the effect of lactoferrin on hepcidin remains unclear, and the measurement of serum hepcidin will help to explain the modulatory mechanism of lactoferrin on iron absorption. Moreover, the absorption efficiency difference between apo-lactoferrin and holo-lactoferrin may be another aspect for the further exploration of how lactoferrin modulates iron absorption. Iron absorption efficiency can be detected in animals or human volunteers receiving lactoferrin with different iron saturation levels. It may help to understand the interaction between apo-lactoferrin and dietary free iron in the gut, as well as their effects on intestinal iron absorption.
In conclusion, studies support lactoferrin as a superior supplement to ferrous sulfate to improve serum iron, ferritin and hemoglobin levels. Lactoferrin-bound iron is not an iron supplement per se, but immune modulator affecting iron homeostasis via lactoferrin-dependent signal transduction mechanism [9]. The anti-inflammation effect of lactoferrin may be the potential mechanism to explain its efficacy on iron status and erythropoiesis. Further intervention and mechanistic studies are warranted to explore the functions of lactoferrin in the regulation of iron absorption.


  1. Donker, A.E.; van der Staaij, H. The critical roles of iron during the journey from fetus to adolescent: Developmental aspects of iron homeostasis. Blood Rev. 2021, 50, 100866.
  2. Lopez, A.; Cacoub, P. Iron deficiency anaemia. Lancet 2016, 387, 907–916.
  3. Dev, S.; Babitt, J.L. Overview of iron metabolism in health and disease. Hemodial. Int. 2017, 21 (Suppl. 1), S6–S20.
  4. Sundararajan, S.; Rabe, H. Prevention of iron deficiency anemia in infants and toddlers. Pediatr. Res. 2021, 89, 63–73.
  5. Camaschella, C. Iron deficiency. Blood 2019, 133, 30–39.
  6. Pasricha, S.-R.; Tye-Din, J.; Muckenthaler, M.U.; Swinkels, D.W. Iron deficiency. Lancet 2021, 397, 233–248.
  7. Vos, T.; Abajobir, A.A.; Abate, K.H.; Abbafati, C.; Abbas, K.M.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abdulkader, R.S.; Abdulle, A.M.; Abebo, T.A.; Abera, S.F.; et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017, 390, 1211–1259.
  8. World Health Organization. Global Anaemia Reduction Efforts among Women of Reproductive Age: Impact, Achievement of Targets and the Way forward for Optimizing Efforts; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020; ISBN 978-924-001-220-2.
  9. Kassebaum, N.J.; Jasrasaria, R.; Naghavi, M.; Wulf, S.K.; Johns, N.; Lozano, R.; Regan, M.; Weatherall, D.; Chou, D.P.; Eisele, T.P.; et al. A systematic analysis of global anemia burden from 1990 to 2010. Blood 2014, 123, 615–624.
  10. Stevens, G.A.; Finucane, M.M.; De-Regil, L.M.; Paciorek, C.J.; Flaxman, S.R.; Branca, F.; Peña-Rosas, J.P.; Bhutta, Z.A.; Ezzati, M.; on behalf of Nutrition Impact Model Study Group (Anaemia). Global, regional, and national trends in haemoglobin concentration and prevalence of total and severe anaemia in children and pregnant and non-pregnant women for 1995–2011: A systematic analysis of population-representative data. Lancet Glob. Health 2013, 1, e16–e25.
  11. World Health Organization. The Global Prevalence of Anaemia in 2011; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015.
  12. Daru, J.; Zamora, J.; Fernández-Félix, B.M.; Vogel, J.; Oladapo, O.T.; Morisaki, N.; Tunçalp, Ö.; Torloni, M.R.; Mittal, S.; Jayaratne, K.; et al. Risk of maternal mortality in women with severe anaemia during pregnancy and post partum: A multilevel analysis. Lancet Glob. Health 2018, 6, e548–e554.
  13. Breymann, C. Iron Deficiency Anemia in Pregnancy. Semin Hematol. 2015, 52, 339–347.
  14. Global Nutrition Targets 2025: Anaemia Policy Brief; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.
  15. Azzopardi, P.S.; Hearps, S.J.; Francis, K.L.; Kennedy, E.C.; Mokdad, A.H.; Kassebaum, N.J.; Lim, S.; Irvine, C.M.S.; Vos, T.; Brown, A.D.; et al. Progress in adolescent health and wellbeing: Tracking 12 headline indicators for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016. Lancet 2019, 393, 1101–1118.
  16. Donovan, A.; Brownlie, A.; Zhou, Y.; Shepard, J.; Pratt, S.J.; Moynihan, J.; Paw, B.H.; Drejer, A.; Barut, B.; Zapata, A.; et al. Positional cloning of zebrafish ferroportin1 identifies a conserved vertebrate iron exporter. Nature 2000, 403, 776–781.
  17. Pigeon, C.; Ilyin, G.; Courselaud, B.; Leroyer, P.; Turlin, B.; Brissot, P.; Loréal, O. A new mouse liver-specific gene, encoding a protein homologous to human antimicrobial peptide hepcidin, is overexpressed during iron overload. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 7811–7819.
  18. Nemeth, E.; Tuttle, M.S.; Powelson, J.; Vaughn, M.B.; Donovan, A.; Ward, D.M.V.; Ganz, T.; Kaplan, J. Hepcidin regulates cellular iron efflux by binding to ferroportin and inducing its internalization. Science 2004, 306, 2090–2093.
  19. Muñoz, M.; García-Erce, J.A.; Remacha, Á.F. Disorders of iron metabolism. Part 1: Molecular basis of iron homoeostasis. J. Clin. Pathol. 2011, 64, 281–286.
  20. Lee, P.; Peng, H.; Gelbart, T.; Wang, L.; Beutler, E. Regulation of hepcidin transcription by interleukin-1 and interleukin-6. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 1906–1910.
  21. Wrighting, D.M.; Andrews, N.C. Interleukin-6 induces hepcidin expression through STAT3. Blood 2006, 108, 3204–3209.
  22. Das, N.K.; Schwartz, A.J.; Barthel, G.; Inohara, N.; Liu, Q.; Sankar, A.; Hill, D.R.; Ma, X.; Lamberg, O.; Schnizlein, M.K.; et al. Microbial Metabolite Signaling Is Required for Systemic Iron Homeostasis. Cell Metab. 2020, 31, 115–130.e116.
  23. Griffin, I.J. The Effects of Different Forms of Lactoferrin on Iron Absorption. J. Nutr. 2020, 150, 3053–3054.
  24. Ke, C.; Lan, Z.; Hua, L.; Ying, Z.; Humina, X.; Jia, S.; Weizheng, T.; Ping, Y.; Lingying, C.; Meng, M. Iron metabolism in infants: Influence of bovine lactoferrin from iron-fortified formula. Nutrition 2015, 31, 304–309.
  25. Macciò, A.; Madeddu, C. Efficacy and Safety of Oral Lactoferrin Supplementation in Combination with rHuEPO-β for the Treatment of Anemia in Advanced Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy: Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Study. Oncologist 2010, 15, 894–902.
  26. Rosa, L.; Lepanto, M.S.; Cutone, A.; Siciliano, R.A.; Paesano, R.; Costi, R.; Musci, G.; Valenti, P. Influence of oral administration mode on the efficacy of commercial bovine Lactoferrin against iron and inflammatory homeostasis disorders. Biometals 2020, 33, 159–168.
  27. Lambert, L.A.; Perri, H.; Meehan, T. Evolution of duplications in the transferrin family of proteins. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2005, 140, 11–25.
  28. Kruzel, M.L.; Olszewska, P.; Pazdrak, B.; Krupinska, A.M.; Actor, J.K. New insights into the systemic effects of oral lactoferrin: Transcriptome profiling. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2021, 99, 47–53.
  29. Lönnerdal, B.; Bryant, A. Absorption of iron from recombinant human lactoferrin in young US women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006, 83, 305–309.
  30. Mikulic, N.; Uyoga, M.A.; Mwasi, E.; Stoffel, N.U.; Zeder, C.; Karanja, S.; Zimmermann, M.B. Iron Absorption is Greater from Apo-Lactoferrin and is Similar Between Holo-Lactoferrin and Ferrous Sulfate: Stable Iron Isotope Studies in Kenyan Infants. J. Nutr. 2020, 150, 3200–3207.
  31. Ward, P.P.; Mendoza-Meneses, M.; Cunningham, G.A.; Conneely, O.M. Iron status in mice carrying a targeted disruption of lactoferrin. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 23, 178–185.
  32. Roy, C.N.; Mak, H.H.; Akpan, I.; Losyev, G.; Zurakowski, D.; Andrews, N.C. Hepcidin antimicrobial peptide transgenic mice exhibit features of the anemia of inflammation. Blood 2007, 109, 4038–4044.
  33. Nicolas, G.; Bennoun, M.; Porteu, A.; Mativet, S.; Beaumont, C.; Grandchamp, B.; Sirito, M.; Sawadogo, M.; Kahn, A.; Vaulont, S. Severe iron deficiency anemia in transgenic mice expressing liver hepcidin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 4596–4601.
  34. Jeong, J.Y.; Silver, M.; Parnes, A.; Nikiforow, S.; Berliner, N.; Vanasse, G.J. Resveratrol ameliorates TNFα-mediated suppression of erythropoiesis in human CD34+ cells via modulation of NF-κB signalling. Br. J. Haematol. 2011, 155, 93–101.
  35. Vega-Bautista, A.; de la Garza, M.; Carrero, J.C.; Campos-Rodríguez, R.; Godínez-Victoria, M.; Drago-Serrano, M.E. The Impact of Lactoferrin on the Growth of Intestinal Inhabitant Bacteria. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4707.
  36. Paganini, D.; Uyoga, M.A.; Kortman, G.A.M.; Cercamondi, C.I.; Moretti, D.; Barth-Jaeggi, T.; Schwab, C.; Boekhorst, J.; Timmerman, H.M.; Lacroix, C.; et al. Prebiotic galacto-oligosaccharides mitigate the adverse effects of iron fortification on the gut microbiome: A randomised controlled study in Kenyan infants. Gut 2017, 66, 1956–1967.
  37. Paganini, D.; Uyoga, M.A.; Cercamondi, C.I.; Moretti, D.; Mwasi, E.; Schwab, C.; Bechtler, S.; Mutuku, F.M.; Galetti, V.; Lacroix, C.; et al. Consumption of galacto-oligosaccharides increases iron absorption from a micronutrient powder containing ferrous fumarate and sodium iron EDTA: A stable-isotope study in Kenyan infants. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 106, 1020–1031.
  38. Main Elements of Proposed Model. Available online: (accessed on 20 January 2022).
  39. Main Elements of Proposed Model. Available online: (accessed on 20 January 2022).
  40. Muñoz, M.; García-Erce, J.A.; Remacha, F. Disorders of iron metabolism. Part II: Iron deficiency and iron overload. J. Clin. Pathol. 2011, 64, 287–296.
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to : , , ,
View Times: 2.1K
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 13 Apr 2022