Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry related to this topic through the link below:
Check Note
Ver. Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 1968 2022-04-08 10:42:57 |
2 Format Change + 3 word(s) 1971 2022-04-08 11:00:05 |
Factors envolved in Coal Slurry Flocculation Process
Upload a video

Coal slurry is a mixture of finely grained coal and other minerals suspended and/or sediment in the water, generated during the coal preparation processes, accounting for more than half of mining operating cost. Dewatering technology is simultaneously confronted with obstacles and possibilities, and it may yet be improved as the crucial step for reducing the ultimate processing cost. Coagulation/flocculation is a process in which solid and liquid parts of a solution are separated using different types of coagulants and flocculants.

polymeric flocculants flocculation process coal slurry coal tailings
Table of Contents

    1. Coagulation

    A combination of coagulation and sedimentation of suspended particles has been widely used for wastewater treatment purposes for many years. Inorganic salts of multivalent metals such as ferric chloride, ferrous sulfate, magnesium chloride, and alum are commonly used as coagulants [1][2]. It is generally accepted that inorganic salts are subjected to hydrolysis into the corresponding cations and anions when they are added into the aqueous environment. Under this circumstance, they form a wide variety of monomeric and polymeric products, depending on the temperature, solution pH, type, and dosage of ions [3]. Therefore, the primary mechanism in the coagulation of coal tailings slurry is the adsorption of metal ions on the coal surface and the neutralization of the electrical double layer (EDL) charges [4]. In this context, a small amount of positively charged metal ions could neutralize the negatively charged suspended coal particles and reduce the repulsion force between them; therefore, particles will form floc together due to the domination of Van der Waals forces. However, an excessive amount of coagulants reverses the charge of particles from negative to positive, which results in the dispersion of the non-coagulated particles [4].
    The low-cost market price is the key factor for choosing coagulantsas, given in Table 1. According to the literature, electrolytes cannot coagulate suspended particles larger than 75 μm in size in coal slurry; as a result, small particles form in the coagulation process of coal slurry using electrolytes flocs, and the coarser materials are entrapped in them [5].
    Table 1. The market price for bulk sales of coagulants [6][7].
    Chemical Material Coagulants
    FeCl3 Lime Alum PACL Fe2(SO4)3

    Price, €/tonne






    2. Role of Different Factors in Coal Slurry Flocculation Process Using Polymeric Flocculants

    Flocculation characteristics, including floc size and structure, cake resistance, and moisture content in CPPs, are influenced by different factors such as coal slurry composition, charge density and molecular weight of flocculants, polymer structure, polymer dosage, the hardness of water, suspension pH, etc. [8]. The characteristics of flocs produced in the flocculation process are very important because they can affect subsequent operations such as dewatering and filtration in CPPs. Filtration cake with high moisture content can cause many problems such as lower fuel heat value and higher transportation costs [9]. The experimental results showed that anionic flocculants produced large and strong flocs with less porosity; hence, they increased the filtration rate. On the other hand, cationic flocculants small and tight flocs that decrease the filtration rate due to the poor permeability of the filter cake [10][8][11][12].

    2.1. Composition of Coal Tailings

    Coal tailing slurries can contain variable amounts of coal depending on the applied beneficiation approach. Metallurgical coals of higher market value are normally treated in fines treatment processes, including gravity and flotation methods. Thermal coals are often only treated to 0.25–0.50 mm with the ultrafine passing into the tailing stream. According to the literature, the composition of coal tailing slurry significantly affected the flocculation process [10]. Chemical analysis results of CPP tailings indicated that they usually contain organic matter (coal), quartz, metal oxides, sulfides and carbonates, mica, predominantly muscovite, and different clay minerals such as kaolinite, illite, montmorillonite, etc. [10][13][14][15][16]. Generally, in run-of-mine coal, clay particles can occur as 60–80% impurities [17]. Therefore, it is necessary to understand how clay particles can influence coagulation, flocculation and sedimentation, and filtration of coal tailings solids. In clay particles, the face charges and irregular edges significantly impact flocculation mechanisms and efficiency [10].
    Regarding a coal-kaolinite suspension, it is reported that the repulsive electrostatic force between the suspended particles can be decreased by adding Ca2+ ions. This makes the Van der Waals attractive force the dominant interaction force that results in the aggregation of particles [18][19]. Several experimental results have shown that anionic polymers with high molecular weight are generally desirable for flocculation and dewatering of negatively charged kaolinite and smectite clay particles [20][21][22][23][24]. On the other hand, some experiment results indicated that repulsive electrostatic forces between anionic groups of polymers and negatively charged kaolinite particles limit the polymer adsorption. Furthermore, variations in pH and ionic strength can change the stability of these long-chain polymers [20][25][26][27]. In another study, montmorillonite suspensions formed clay platelet networks and captured coal particles [28]. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for clay minerals results reveal that the house-of-cards structures formed by permanent contact of clay platelets with surrounding particles have high porosity and low settling rate, attributed to the attractive forces keeping the platelets together [29]. The house-of-cards structure comprised edge-to-edge (EE) and edge-to-face (EF) contacts. Edge-to-face attraction results from attractive double-layer forces between negatively charged faces and positively charged platelet edges [30]. On the other hand, EE contact results from the coalescence of nanobubbles attached to platelet edges [29].

    2.2. Effects of pH on the Performance of Polymeric Flocculants

    Lignite coal and rock particles may carry a negative charge in an aqueous medium resulting from hydrogen ions dissociating from the alumina-silicic acid surface depending on the pH of the solution [4][5]. Consequently, applying any change in the pH of the medium or the concentration of electrolytes can alter the properties of the EDL, the stability of the suspension, and subsequently the settling rate in the flocculation process with or without flocculant [31][32]. The influence of pH change on the zeta potential of coal particles can be associated with the presence of pH-dependent ionizable functional groups on the surface of particles. The protonation of basic nitrogen-containing functional groups created a positive surface charge on coal particles. In contrast, the negative surface charge is attributed to the dissociation of acidic surface functional groups such as carboxylic [33]. Sabah and Erkan (2006) showed that decreasing the acidic pH value decreased the zeta potential by increasing the H+ ion concentration; as a result, coagulation occurs due to the van der Waals force domination [32]. Some researchers suggest that in pH value above the natural pH of plant water, inorganic ions such as Ca2+ and Mg2+ stemmed from water hardness or pH adjustment become active and act as a bridge between negatively charged particles and increase the settling rate [17][32].
    Moreover, pH can influence the structure of flocs and change the polymer adsorption and conformation because for most mineral particles, i.e., coal, quartz, and clay, OH and H+ ions are the potential determining ions (PDI) [15]. For example, face-face and edge-face interactions form different structures at different pH values in a kaolinite suspension. Kaolinite particles at low pH carry a positive charge on their edge and a negative charge on their basal surfaces due to proton loss/gain face-edge. Therefore, edge-face electrostatic interaction between clay particles form flocs in the three-dimension house-of-cards structure [27][32][34][35]. On the other hand, both the basal and surfaces of kaolinite particles become negatively charged at high pH values and form a Bandermodel arrangement [27]. The pH also contributes to the conformation of polymers, which changes the final strength of flocs. For instance, anionic polyacrylamides have a coil shape conformation in low pH while they are extended at high pH due to electrostatic repulsion between the charged groups [27][36][37]. Another researcher investigated the effect of pH on the adsorption of polymeric flocculants and indicated that the increasing the pH value increased the negative charge of kaolinite particles. This would improve the flocculation using CPAM and deteriorate the process using anionic polyacrylamide due to the increase and decrease of electrostatic attraction force between negatively charged particles and ionic groups of polymers [27][38]. However, this explanation contradicts the experimental results using anionic polymers undertaken by Ciftci and Isik [39]. According to their flocculation experiments, the anionic groups of polymers become ionized in acidic pH, weakening the bridge formation and flocculation efficiency [39].
    The acquired electrical charge by particles, or adsorbed films on their surface, causes aggregation resistance in the fine-particle suspensions. The electrical charge of particles can be controlled through the solution pH. At some pH (isoelectric point), particles have no electrical charge. They are unstable enough for the coagulation process to occur; however, this method could be impractical if the isoelectric point occurs in an unconventional pH range. Moreover, these ions can reverse the zeta potential in which the system is destabilized, according to Hogg (2000) [23]. This destabilization close to this range may be attributed to charge reversal and destabilization of colloidal particles [40]. Polymeric substances are very effective for this purpose since their molecules absorb on the oppositely charged surface (charge-patch mechanism) and aggregation occurs subsequently through the interaction of patches with regions of bare surface on other particles. High molecular weight polymers are most frequently used for floc development, while low molecular weight is used for destabilization purposes [41].

    2.3. Water Hardness

    Since the water in a tailing slurry is generally recycled and reused in CPPs, the concentration of suspended particles should be at the lowest level. Otherwise, they would harm the efficiency of coal washery processes [17][42]. Water hardness in coal tailings can be characterized approximately with the concentration of multivalent cations, including Ca2+ and Mg2+, which are brought to coal tailings through the clean water and leaching from minerals [43]. The results of the research study showed that the mineralogical composition of run-of-mine coal directly affected the water hardness of recycled water. Zhang et al. (2017) has asserted that carbonate minerals, especially gypsum, increase the water hardness because they can release ions including Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions, while the clay minerals can adsorb these ions and decrease the water hardness on the contrary [43].

    2.4. Properties of Polymers

    For desirable flocculation results, characteristics of the polymer flocculant such as molecular weight, charge density, and structure have crucial roles [23][44]. For a specific type of polymeric flocculant, the increase in the molecular weight achieved by increasing the length of the molecular backbone would speed up the sedimentation rate due to improving the bridge-binding of small particles [45][46]. Although increasing the charge density enhances the settling velocity, an excess increase in charge density adversely affects the flocculation process in floc size and floc density [47]. A research experiment investigating the effect of polyacrylamide polymers on floc characteristics showed that increasing the charge density from 10 to 35% increased the adsorption rate by increasing the electrostatic attraction force between the negatively charged kaolinite particles and the positively charged polymer chains. Increasing the absorption rate resulted in decreased floc size by reducing the available sites for bridging [48]. This experiment also exhibited that both the adsorption rate and bridging decreased by increasing the charge density in the case of the anionic polymers. This occurs by increasing the electrostatic repulsion force between the negatively charged surface of the particles and anionic polyacrylamides (PAM) chains.
    Polymer conformation is another factor that contributes to the adsorption of polymeric flocculants onto the suspended particles. It depends on different factors such as the solvent nature, the structure of the polymer itself, the position and number of active groups, and the number of available sites on the surface of solid particles. 

    2.5. Mixing Condition

    The optimum mixing time of suspended particles in the flocculation process can be defined as the time needed to coat the half-surface particles by flocculants. The required time must be adjusted to create flocs through the adsorption of flocculants onto the particle surfaces. Long mixing times can hinder flocculation due to the steric effect resulting from overcoating the surface of particles. In contrast, a short mixing time can increase floc touchiness by decreasing the possibility of connecting particles and flocculant molecules and increasing floc breakage rate [49]. Hogg (2000) has asserted that mixing and agitation are the most important affecting factors that contribute to the flocculation process [23]. Moreover, mixing speed is important in breaking or shearing the produced flocs [49].


    1. Lee, C.S.; Robinson, J.; Chong, M.F. A review on application of flocculants in wastewater treatment. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2014, 92, 489–508.
    2. Joo, D.J.; Shin, W.S.; Choi, J.H.; Choi, S.J.; Kim, M.C.; Han, M.H.; Ha, T.W.; Kim, Y.H. Decolorization of reactive dyes using inorganic coagulants and synthetic polymer. Dye. Pigment. 2007, 73, 59–64.
    3. Duan, J.; Gregory, J. Coagulation by hydrolysing metal salts. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 100, 475–502.
    4. Coca, J.; Bueno, J.L.; Sastre, H. Zeta-Potential and the Effect of Coagulants on Coal Slurries. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 1983, 16, 335–338.
    5. Osborne, D.G. Flocculant behaviour with coal—Shale slurries. Int. J. Miner. Processing 1974, 1, 243–260.
    6. Sarika, R.; Kalogerakis, N.; Mantzavinos, D. Treatment of olive mill effluents: Part II. Complete removal of solids by direct flocculation with poly-electrolytes. Environ. Int. 2005, 31, 297–304.
    7. Shewa, W.A.; Dagnew, M. Revisiting Chemically Enhanced Primary Treatment of Wastewater: A Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5928.
    8. Tao, D.; Parekh, B.K.; Liu, J.T.; Chen, S. An investigation on dewatering kinetics of ultrafine coal. Int. J. Miner. Processing 2003, 70, 235–249.
    9. Tao, D.; Groppo, J.; Parekh, B. Enhanced ultrafine coal dewatering using flocculation filtration processes. Miner. Eng. 2000, 13, 163–171.
    10. Alam, N.; Ozdemir, O.; Hampton, M.A.; Nguyen, A.V. Dewatering of coal plant tailings: Flocculation followed by filtration. Fuel 2011, 90, 26–35.
    11. Tao, D.; Groppo, J.; Parekhm, B. Effects of vacuum filtration parameters on ultrafine coal dewatering. Coal Perparation 2000, 21, 315–335.
    12. Parekh, B.K. Dewatering of fine coal and refuse slurries-problems and possibilities. Procedia Earth Planet. Sci. 2009, 1, 621–626.
    13. Ofori, P.; Nguyen, A.V.; Firth, B.; McNally, C.; Ozdemir, O. Shear-induced floc structure changes for enhanced dewatering of coal preparation plant tailings. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 172, 914–923.
    14. Ghernaout, D.; Ghernaout, B. Sweep flocculation as a second form of charge neutralisation—A review. Desalination Water Treat. 2012, 44, 15–28.
    15. Sabah, E.; Cengiz, I. An evaluation procedure for flocculation of coal preparation plant tailings. Water Res. 2004, 38, 1542–1549.
    16. Lin, Z.; Li, P.; Hou, D.; Kuang, Y.; Wang, G. Aggregation Mechanism of Particles: Effect of Ca2+ and Polyacrylamide on Coagulation and Flocculation of Coal Slime Water Containing Illite. Minerals 2017, 7, 30.
    17. Xu, Z.; Liu, J.; Choung, J.; Zhou, Z. Electrokinetic study of clay interactions with coal in flotation. Int. J. Miner. Processing 2003, 68, 183–196.
    18. Zhang, M.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y. Effects of water hardness on the dispersion of fine coal and kaolinite in coal slurry. J. China Coal Soc. 2008, 9, 1058–1063.
    19. Gui, X.; Xing, Y.; Rong, G.; Cao, Y.; Liu, J. Interaction forces between coal and kaolinite particles measured by atomic force microscopy. Powder Technol. 2016, 301, 349–355.
    20. Clark, A.Q.; Herrington, T.M.; Petzold, J.C. The flocculation of kaolin suspensions with anionic polyacrylamides of varying molar mass and anionic character. Colloids Surf. 1990, 44, 247–261.
    21. De Kretser, R.G. The Rheological Properties and De-Watering of Slurried Coal Mine Tailings; University of Melbourne: Parkville, Australia, 1995.
    22. Richardson, P.; Connelly, L. Industrial coagulants and flocculants. In Reagents in Mineral Technology; Routledge: London, UK, 1988; pp. 519–558.
    23. Hogg, R. Flocculation and dewatering. Int. J. Miner. Processing 2000, 58, 223–236.
    24. Scheiner, B.; Wilemon, G. Applied flocculation efficiency: A comparison of polyethylene oxide and polyacrylamides. Flocculation Biotechnol. Sep. Syst. 1987, 4, 175–185.
    25. Peng, F.F.; Di, P. Effect of multivalent salts—Calcium and aluminum on the flocculation of kaolin suspension with anionic polyacrylamide. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1994, 164, 229–237.
    26. Somasundaran, P.; Chia, Y.H.; Gorelik, R. Adsorption of polyacrylamides on kaolinite and its flocculation and stabilization. In Polymer Adsorption and Dispersion Stability; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1984; pp. 393–410.
    27. Taylor, M.L.; Morris, G.E.; Self, P.G.; Smart, R.S. Kinetics of adsorption of high molecular weight anionic polyacrylamide onto kaolinite: The flocculation process. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2002, 250, 28–36.
    28. Zhang, M.-Q.; Liu, Q.; Liu, J.-T. Extended DLVO theory applied to coal slime-water suspensions. J. Cent. South Univ. 2012, 19, 3558–3563.
    29. Żbik, M.; Horn, R.G. Hydrophobic attraction may contribute to aqueous flocculation of clays. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2003, 222, 323–328.
    30. Olphen, H.V. An Introduction to Clay Colloid Chemistry. J. Pharm. Sci. 1963, 53, 230.
    31. Baichenko, A.A.; Mel’tinisov, M.; Galina, G.; Ivanova, T. Study of flocculation of coal-clay suspensions from hydraulic minin. Sov. Min. 1989, 25, 292–296.
    32. Sabah, E.; Erkan, Z.E. Interaction mechanism of flocculants with coal waste slurry. Fuel 2006, 85, 350–359.
    33. DoymuŞ, K. The effect of ionic electrolytes and pH on the zeta potential of fine coal particles. Turk. J. Chem. 2007, 31, 589–597.
    34. Johnson, S.B.; Franks, G.V.; Scales, P.J.; Boger, D.V.; Healy, T.W. Surface chemistry–rheology relationships in concentrated mineral suspensions. Int. J. Miner. Processing 2000, 58, 267–304.
    35. Nasser, M.; James, A. Settling and sediment bed behaviour of kaolinite in aqueous media. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 51, 10–17.
    36. Tjipangandjara, K.; Somasundaran, P. Effects of the conformation of polyacrylic acid on the dispersion-flocculation of alumina and kaolinite fines. Adv. Powder Technol. 1992, 3, 119–127.
    37. Kumar, S.; Bhattacharya, S.; Mandre, N. Characterization and flocculation studies of fine coal tailings. J. South. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 2014, 114, 945–949.
    38. Besra, L.; Sengupta, D.; Roy, S.; Ay, P. Influence of polymer adsorption and conformation on flocculation and dewatering of kaolin suspension. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2004, 37, 231–246.
    39. Ciftci, H.; Isık, S. Settling characteristics of coal preparation plant fine tailings using anionic polymers. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2017, 34, 2211–2217.
    40. Kamble, S.; Agrawal, S.; Cherumukkil, S.; Sharma, V.; Jasra, R.V.; Munshi, P. Revisiting Zeta Potential, the Key Feature of Interfacial Phenomena, with Applications and Recent Advancements. ChemistrySelect 2022, 7, e202103084.
    41. Gregory, J. Rates of flocculation of latex particles by cationic polymers. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1973, 42, 448–456.
    42. Das, B.; Prakash, S.; Biswal, S.; Reddy, P. Settling characteristics of coal washery tailings using synthetic polyelectrolytes with fine magnetite. J. -South Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 2006, 106, 707.
    43. Zhang, Z.; Nong, H.; Zhuang, L.; Liu, J. Effect of water hardness on the settling characteristics of coal tailings. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2017, 39, 1317–1322.
    44. Yarar, B. Evaluation of flocculation and filtration procedures applied to WSRC sludge. In Report No: WSRC-TR-2001–00213; Colorado School of Mines: Golden, CO, USA, 2001; pp. 1–34.
    45. Alamgir, A.; Harbottle, D.; Masliyah, J.; Xu, Z. Al-PAM assisted filtration system for abatement of mature fine tailings. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2012, 80, 91–99.
    46. Friend, J.; Kitchener, J. Some physico—chemical aspects of the separation of finely-divided minerals by selective flocculation. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1973, 28, 1071–1080.
    47. Ersoy, B. Effect of pH and polymer charge density on settling rate and turbidity of natural stone suspensions. Int. J. Miner. Processing 2005, 75, 207–216.
    48. Nasser, M.; James, A. Effect of polyacrylamide polymers on floc size and rheological behaviour of kaolinite suspensions. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2007, 301, 311–322.
    49. Oruç, F.; Sabah, E. Effect of mixing conditions on flocculation performance of fine coal tailings. In Proceedings of the XXIII International Mineral Processing Congress, Turkey, Istanbul, 3–8 September 2006; pp. 3–8.
    Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to : , , , , , , ,
    View Times: 198
    Revisions: 2 times (View History)
    Update Date: 08 Apr 2022
    Table of Contents


      Are you sure you want to delete?

      Video Upload Options

      Do you have a full video?
      If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
      Khazaie, A.; Mazarji, M.; Samali, B.; Osborne, D.G.; Minkina, T.; Sushkova, S.; Mandzhieva, S.S.; Soldatov, A. Factors envolved in Coal Slurry Flocculation Process. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 03 February 2023).
      Khazaie A, Mazarji M, Samali B, Osborne DG, Minkina T, Sushkova S, et al. Factors envolved in Coal Slurry Flocculation Process. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed February 03, 2023.
      Khazaie, Atousa, Mahmoud Mazarji, Bijan Samali, David George Osborne, Tatiana Minkina, Svetlana Sushkova, Saglara S. Mandzhieva, Alexander Soldatov. "Factors envolved in Coal Slurry Flocculation Process," Encyclopedia, (accessed February 03, 2023).
      Khazaie, A., Mazarji, M., Samali, B., Osborne, D.G., Minkina, T., Sushkova, S., Mandzhieva, S.S., & Soldatov, A. (2022, April 08). Factors envolved in Coal Slurry Flocculation Process. In Encyclopedia.
      Khazaie, Atousa, et al. ''Factors envolved in Coal Slurry Flocculation Process.'' Encyclopedia. Web. 08 April, 2022.