Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Ver. Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 4848 2022-04-06 10:06:09 |
2 format correct -2 word(s) 4846 2022-04-06 10:45:31 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?


Are you sure to Delete?
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Zucconi, L.; Canini, F.; Isola, D.; Caneva, G. Fungi Affecting Wall Paintings of Historical Value. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 28 November 2023).
Zucconi L, Canini F, Isola D, Caneva G. Fungi Affecting Wall Paintings of Historical Value. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed November 28, 2023.
Zucconi, Laura, Fabiana Canini, Daniela Isola, Giulia Caneva. "Fungi Affecting Wall Paintings of Historical Value" Encyclopedia, (accessed November 28, 2023).
Zucconi, L., Canini, F., Isola, D., & Caneva, G.(2022, April 06). Fungi Affecting Wall Paintings of Historical Value. In Encyclopedia.
Zucconi, Laura, et al. "Fungi Affecting Wall Paintings of Historical Value." Encyclopedia. Web. 06 April, 2022.
Fungi Affecting Wall Paintings of Historical Value

Wall paintings have been a cultural expression of human creativity throughout history. Their degradation or destruction represents a loss to the world’s cultural heritage, and fungi have been identified as a major contributor to their decay. For this reason, is of utmost importance to know the species involved, their distribution, the method used for their identification, and the possible relation with the environment.

frescoes deterioration fungal diversity fungal ecology hypogean conservation mural paintings biodeterioration subterranean cultural heritage deterioration wall paintings conservation

1. Introduction

Wall paintings are among the most representative elements of figurative artworks and have been developed by human creativity since prehistoric times [1]. Their technique of execution requires a layered structure consisting of a support, a ground, and a paint layer, which changed over time across different cultures (secco, such as tempera, or frescoes) [2]. In secco technique, which is the earliest, the preparation layers are applied, but the colors remain on the surface, whereas in the frescoes the colors are applied before the mortar dries, allowing their in-depth penetration [2]. The employed colors usually have a mineral origin, but some pigments can also be derived from plants. Organic compounds can later be added during restoration or because of other human activities (e.g., firing candles in the churches) [3].

The observed deterioration phenomena of mural paintings depend largely on the materials used and the environmental conditions [4]. Humidity, lighting, temperature, ventilation, and nutrients select the occurring biological agents [1][5]. Organisms belonging to all domains such as bacteria, algae, fungi, arthropods and in a lesser extent lichens, mosses, ferns, and higher plants, have been found on the surfaces of mural paintings [4][6]. Indeed, given the indoor conditions of most mural paintings, photoautotrophs are limited, while fungi and bacteria are more frequent [7]. Bacteria with reduced nutritional needs have been often suggested to be the first colonizers. Fungi, due to their large assortment of enzymes and the remarkable ability to thrive in a wide range of environmental conditions, have been recognized as the most common cause of biodeterioration of painted surfaces and other artworks [1][8][9][10].

The damage is generally due to the mycelial growth on the substrate, hyphal penetration, and fruiting bodies production onto and into the substrate, all of which increase the volume and number of cracks in the pigment layer and lead to surface fragments detachments [1][11]. Fungal colonization generally starts on the surface and then moves in-depth, up to decreasing painted layer cohesion and cause exfoliations and loss of the paint [12][13]. A study carried out by Dornieden and colleagues demonstrated that some fungi, such as the so-called microcolonial black fungi, are among the most dangerous for cultural heritages and can influence the resistance to shear and torsion stress of mortar and marble, contributing to the separation of different layers of material in mural paintings [14]. Aesthetic damages are also frequent, due to pigment discolorations, mycelial pigmentation, and/or the release of organic pigments of different colors, depending on the species involved. Extracellular enzymes and/or organic acids are generally released into the substrate from fungal hyphae causing chemical alterations of the mineral constituents of the surfaces as well as the original pigments [12][13]. The secretion of organic acids (e.g., oxalic, citric, succinic, formic, malic, acetic, fumaric, glyoxylic, gluconic, and tartaric acids) can cause dissolution of cations and chelation of metal ions from mortar and mineral pigments, leading to the formation of stable metal complexes whose crystallization causes an increase of internal pressure resulting in cracking, peeling, and the eventual loss of mural fragments [15].

Awareness of microorganisms' considerable role in preserving art objects and historical buildings dates back to the 1950s [16]. Ionita and colleagues provided one of the first detailed descriptions of the mycoflora involved in the deterioration of mural paintings of monasteries in Moldavia, noting that it was favoured by the various nutritional sources present in the materials used for the realization of the frescoes and by local environmental parameters [16]. This was perhaps one of the first statements of the importance of interdisciplinary studies to prevent and control deterioration processes and define restoration and preservation strategies.

Despite the fact that the fungal role in the deterioration of frescoes has been documented by several papers, a global inventory of fungal diversity and their optimal settlement conditions is not yet available. These paintings are mainly present in confined and semi-confined environments, both hypogean and non-hypogean. A fungal alteration pattern dependent on the environmental conditions of these different sites was expected. Those present in hypogean environments are often subjected to a constant extreme humidity, promoting fungal spores germination and mycelial growth. The amount and type of available nutrients also affect the fungal growth rate and the type of fungal taxa. Nutrients may arrive from the external environment as airborne particles, and the more confined are the environments, the lower are the air spores dispersion phenomena. 

2. Fungal Diversity on Wall Paintings

Even if fungi have been suggested as secondary colonizers of painted mural substrates, they are among the most common microbial life-forms present in these environments and the primary cause of their biodeterioration [1][9][10]. The wide biodiversity observed confirms the potential key role of fungi in such colonization process and suggests a combination of causes that can favor their growth. Fungi recorded belonged to species found in natural environments like soils, plants, and air. A detailed survey of their diversity and distribution should become a prerequisite before any restoration measures in order to prevent further damages [17]. Most records belonged to Ascomycota, with Eurotiales as the most common order, due to the prevalence of Aspergillus and Penicillium genera. The former was one of the most frequently isolated genera, with A. flavus and A. niger among the more frequently recorded species. As reported in the literature, even from the first older papers in this field, these two genera, along with Alternaria, Fusarium, Cladosporium, Mortierella, Chaetomium, and Acremonium, are among the most common deteriogens of such paintings [1][18][11][19][17][20][21][22][23][24]. These taxa are ubiquitous, and their frequent occurrence is due to the production of numerous airborne conidia. A diversity of filamentous fungi, with the most predominant genera Penicillium, Cladosporium, Aspergillus, and Trichoderma, were also isolated from mural paintings of the Parish Church of Santo Aleixo (Portugal) [25]. Species of these genera were recorded on indoor frescoes in Romanian monasteries; their presence was favoured by the organic components and vegetal pigments used, as well as high moisture levels caused by frequent rainwater penetration, which also resulted in the formation of efflorescences [26]. Cladosporium species can cope with various harsh environmental conditions thanks to their low nutritional requirements (i.e., in oligotrophic conditions). Otherwise, Chaetomium species are proteolytic and cellulolytic ascomycetes, favoured by nutrient-rich substrates [27][28][29]. They were reported as the most frequent microfungi on the frescoes of the St. Damian Monastery in Assisi (Italy) [20] and on frescoes in a Serbian church [27]. Furthermore, a community of Aspergillus, Penicillium, Cladosporium, and Chaetomium species was recorded from Medieval wall paintings in Styria (Austria), forming spots of different colors [17]. This group of genera was dominant on two deteriorating frescos in St Clare’s Refectory of the Monastery of St Damian in Assisi [20].

Hypocreales was the second most abundant order, accounting for 18% of total fungal diversity, within which AcremoniumTrichoderma, and Fusarium were among the most common genera. Hypocreales is one of the largest orders of filamentous ascomycetes and exhibits a broad range of ecologies, ranging from plant-associated nutritional modes to animal pathogens (e.g., insect pathogens) and mycoparasites [30]Neocosmospora solani, recorded in Thailand, India, Japan, and France; Simplicillium lamellicola, recorded in Russia; and Clonostachys rosea [31][32], recorded in Japan, are examples of mycoparasitic species, while Parengiodontium album is an insect parasite and was recorded in several countries (Germany, Russia, Romania, Austria, Italy, and England) [33]. The recurrent presence of mites and insects pointed out their possible role in spreading fungi on painted surfaces [20][34].

The plant pathogen species Fusarium oxysporum has been shown to produce an extracellular pinkish pigment that disfigures and aesthetically damages colonized mural paintings and stone surfaces with permanent stains [22].

Phylum Basidiomycota was present with several occasional species, mostly represented by one or two records, and comprises litter, soil, and wood-saprotrophs, ectomycorrhizal, epiphyte, and plant-pathogen species. Their occurrence must be regarded as sporadic, potentially aided by root penetration. The possible role of roots as a carrier for rhizosphere microorganisms, like a dripping line for water condensation, and as an organic carbon source by root exudates has been hypothesized [35][36]. A Basidiomycete was also recorded at the entrance of Roman catacombs [37], possibly due to spores carried by water infiltrations and germinating using organic nutrients from the soil and/or the phototrophic biofilm.

Mucoromycota was present with few species and records, and black meristematic fungi were also rarely recorded. These latter may grow on a wide range of substrates and are resistant to a variety of environmental stresses, as well as being widely distributed epi- and endolithically on monuments [38][39]. Although the biodiversity of black fungi on historical monuments is not fully elucidated, recent samplings indicate that they are also present on wall paintings and that their rare finding could be linked to the isolation protocols used, generally favoring fast-growing species [124]. Two new species of the genus Neodevrisia have been found in the restricted sampling area of the Vallerano cave, and another, still undescribed, from Maijishan grottoes [40][41][42]. Scolecobasidium lascauxensis and S. anomalus were isolated and described from black stains in Lascaux Cave, France [43][44], while the chaetothyrialean black fungi Cladophialophora, Exophiala, and Phialophora have been reported from different sites [45][46][47][48].

Yeasts have been rarely reported, such as Saccharomycetales (Ascomycota) that usually grow by individual yeast cells or Rhodotorula spp. (Basidiomycota) often linked to pink/orange stains due to the release of carotenoids [25][49]. A complete list of species isolated from wall paintings has been reported by Zucconi and colleagues [link with Table 1]

Table 1. List of the fungal entries retrieved from the different papers grouped by genera, in association with the corresponding references and the environmental categories where they have been registered.
Genus Fungal Name References Environment
Acremoniella Acremoniella atra [16] C-NHE
Acremonium Acremonium camptosporum [50] NC-HE
Acremonium charticola [51][17][52][53] NC-HE, C-NHE
Acremonium masseei [45][54] C-HE
Acremonium murorum
(syn. Gliomastix murorum)
[45][46][54][55][56] C-HE, NC-HE
Acremonium rutilum
(syn. A. roseum)
[16] C-NHE
Acremonium cf. rutilum [17] C-NHE
Acremonium sp. [45][51][17][52][53][47][57][58][40][20][59] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE
Acrodontium Acrodontium crateriforme [31] C-NHE
Acrophialophora Acrophialophora fusispora
(syn. A. nainiana)
[55][56] NC-HE
Acrostalagmus Acrostalagmus luteoalbus
(syn. Verticillium lateritium)
[60] C-NHE
Acrothecium Acrothecium sp. [61] O-SPE
Actinomucor Actinomucor elegans [62] C-HE
Akanthomyces Akanthomyces lecanii
(syn. Verticillium lecanii)
[17][57][63] NC-HE, C-NHE
Allophoma Allophoma labilis
(syn. Phoma labilis)
[64] SC-NHE
Alternaria Alternaria alternata
(syn. A. tenuis and Ulocladium alternariae)
[16][65][55][66][19][56][52][20][60][62][64][67][26][68][35][32][69] All environments
Alternaria angustiovoidea [70] C-NHE
Alternaria chartarum
(syn. Ulocladium chartarum)
[16][71] C-NHE
Alternaria dianthi [19] C-NHE
Alternaria longipes [19] C-NHE
Alternaria longissima [55][19][56] NC-HE, C-NHE
Alternaria oudemansii
(syn. Ulocladium oudemansii)
[21] NC-HE, C-NHE
Alternaria tenuissima [16][27][46][19][20][35][72] NC-HE, C-NHE, O-SPE
Alternaria sp.
(syn. Ulocladium sp.)
[73][18][16][45][65][51][53][20][74][28] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE, O-SPE
Amphinema Amphinema sp. [75] C-NHE
Amyloporia Amyloporia sinuosa
(syn. Antrodia sinuosa)
[18] C-NHE
Antrodia Antrodia sp. [75] C-NHE
Apiotrichum Apiotrichum sp.
(syn. Hyalodendron sp.)
[57] C-NHE
Arachnomyces Arachnomyces sp. [40] NC-HE
Armillaria Armillaria sp. [75] C-NHE
Arthrinium Arthrinium arundinis [52] C-NHE
Arthrinium phaeospermum
(syn. Papularia sphaerosperma)
[55][56] NC-HE
Arthrinium sp. [20][28] C-NHE; O-SPE
Arthrobotrys Arthrobotrys sp. [45] C-HE
Ascochyta Ascochyta medicaginicola
(syn. Phoma medicaginis)
[15][68] O-SPE
Ascochyta sp. [72] C-NHE
Ascotricha Ascotricha guamensis [56] NC-HE
Aspergillus Aspergillus aeneus [76] SC-NHE
Aspergillus amstelodami
(syn. Eurotium amstelodami)
[20][26][72] C-NHE
Aspergillus aureolatus [15][68] O-SPE
Aspergillus auricomus [27] O-SPE
Aspergillus candidus [55][56][17][77] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE
Aspergillus clavatus [50] C-HE
Aspergillus creber [15][68] O-SPE
Aspergillus echinulatus [16] C-NHE
Aspergillus europaeus [15][68] O-SPE
Aspergillus fischeri
(syn. Neosartorya fischeri)
[21] NC-HE; C-NHE
Aspergillus flavipes [15][68] O-SPE
Aspergillus flavus
(syn. A. oryzae)
[73][14][15][55][78][19][56][68][35][77][79][80][81][82][83][84][85] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE, O-SPE
Aspergillus fumigatus [78][19][51][20][71][86][87][22][88] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE
Aspergillus glaucus group [88] C-NHE
Aspergillus ivoriensis [76] SC-NHE
Aspergillus japonicus [22] C-HE
Aspergillus melleus [76] SC-NHE
Aspergillus multicolor [76] SC-NHE
Aspergillus nidulans
(syn. Emericella nidulans)
[55][78][19][56][20][62][71][80][81][22] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE
Aspergillus niger [73][14][25][15][55][78][19][56][60][61][64][67][26][68][82][84][85][87][89][90][91] All environments
Aspergillus niger group [20] C-NHE
Aspergillus ochraceus [51][60][76] C-HE, C-NHE, SC-NHE
Aspergillus ostianus [15][68][76] SC-NHE, O-SPE
Aspergillus pallidofulvus [15][68] O-SPE
Aspergillus parasiticus [15][68] O-SPE
Aspergillus penicilloides [92] C-HE
Aspergillus petrakii [76] SC-NHE
Aspergillus proliferans [55][56] NC-HE
Aspergillus protuberus [76] SC-NHE
Aspergillus puniceus [76] SC-NHE
Aspergillus repens [16][53] C-NHE
Aspergillus restrictus [72][93] C-HE, C-NHE
Aspergillus sclerotiorum [86] C-NHE
Aspergillus spectabilis
(syn. Emericella spectabilis)
[76] SC-NHE
Aspergillus stellatus
(syn. Emericella variecolor)
[76] SC-NHE
Aspergillus sydowii [55][56][17][62][63][21][79] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE
Aspergillus terreus [66][78][19][56][22] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE
Aspergillus unguis [86] C-NHE
Aspergillus ustus [20][76] C-NHE, SC-NHE
Aspergillus versicolor [14][55][19][56][17][53][57][20][60][62][26][71][76][77][79][80][81][22][91][93][43][94] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE, SC-NHE
Aspergillus wentii [55][19][56] NC-HE, C-NHE
Aspergillus sp. [18][95][25][27][45][46][96][58][40][20][61][74][75][79][85][87][91][23][97][98][99][24][100][49][101][102] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE, O-SPE
Aureobasidium Aureobasidium pullulans [19][53][57][40][60][63][35] NC-HE, C-NHE
Beauveria Beauveria bassiana [31] C-NHE
Beauveria sp. [40][63] NC-HE, C-NHE
Bispora Bispora sp. [28] O-SPE
Bjerkandera Bjerkandera adusta [87] C-NHE
Blastobotrys Blastobotrys aristatus [17] C-NHE
Blastomyces Blastomyces sp. [93] C-HE
Botryotrichum Botryotrichum atrogriseum [14][26][69] NC-HE, C-NHE
Botryotricum domesticum [70] C-NHE
Botryotrichum murorum
(syn. Chaetomium murorum)
[15][16][20][26][68] C-NHE, O-SPE
Botrytis Botrytis cinerea [52][53][57][20][79] C-NHE
Brunneochlamydosporium Brunneochlamydosporium nepalense (syn. Acremonium nepalense) [51][43] C-HE
Burgoa Burgoa sp. [45] C-HE
Candida Candida takamatsuzukensis [45][103] C-HE
Candida tumulicola [45][103] C-HE
Candida sp. [45][46][28] C-HE, NC-HE
Capronia Capronia coronata [43] C-HE
Cephalotrichum Cephalotrichum verrucisporum
(syn. Doratomyces verrucisporus)
[45][46] C-HE
Cephalotrichum sp.
(syn. Doratomyces sp.)
[45][46] C-HE
Cephalosporium Cephalosporium sp. [97][99] C-NHE
Chaetomium Chaetomium ancistrocladum [15][68] O-SPE
Chaetomium elatum [52] C-NHE
Chaetomium globosum [16][27][65][19][56][51][53][20][62][26] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE, O-SPE
Chaetomium piluliferum
(syn. Botryotrichum piluliferum)
[16][26] C-NHE
Chaetomium sp. [12][27][96][19][17][52][57][20][28][80][81][82] NC-HE, C-NHE, O-SPE
Chondrostereum Chondrostereum sp. [75] C-NHE
Chrysosporium Chrysosporium pseudomerdarium [43] C-HE
Chrysosporium sp. [59][63][21][104] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE, O-SPE
Circinella Circinella muscae
(syn. Circinella sydowii)
[26] C-NHE
Cladophialophora Cladophialophora tumulicola [46][48] C-HE
Cladosporium Cladosporium cladosporioides [27][55][66][78][19][56][51][53][20][60][62][35][69][77][79][43][41][105] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE, O-SPE
Cladosporium cucumerinum [20][60][62] C-HE, C-NHE
Cladosporium herbarum [16][55][19][56][17][20][62][26][32][72][91] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE
Cladosporium macrocarpum [70] NC-HE
Cladosporium sphaerospermum [5][6][12][27][55][19][56][17][52][53][47][57][20][31][62][63][21][72][79] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE, O-SPE
Cladosporium uredinicola [15][68] O-SPE
Cladosporium xylophilum [70] C-NHE
Cladosporium sp. [11][95][25][27][45][96][47][57][58][40][63][32][21][74][28][75][81][85][87][89][91][94][23][99][24][101][106][107][108] All environments
Clonostachys Clonostachys rosea
(syn. Gliocladium roseum)
[32] C-HE
Cochliobolus Cochliobolus geniculatus (syn. Curvulata geniculata) [56][86] NC-HE, C-NHE
Collariella Collariella bostrychodes (syn. Chaetomium bostrychodes) [55][56] NC-HE
Coltricia Coltricia sp. [75] C-NHE
Coprinellus Coprinellus aokii
(syn. Coprinus aokii)
[76] SC-NHE
Coprinopsis Coprinopsis atramentaria [51] C-HE
Coprinopsis cothurnata (syn. Coprinus cothurnatus) [72] C-NHE
Cordyceps Cordyceps farinosa
(syn. Isaria farinosa)
[77] C-HE
Coriolopsis Coriolopsis sp. [75] C-NHE
Cunninghamella Cunninghamella echinulata [12][55][56][52][26] NC-HE, C-NHE
Cunninghamella elegans [51] C-HE
Cunninghamella sp. [45][46] C-HE
Curvularia Curvularia australiensis
(syn. Drechslera australiensis)
[55][66][78][19][56] NC-HE, C-NHE
Curvularia hawaiiensis
(syn. Drechslera hawaiiensis)
[55][66][78][19][56] NC-HE, C-NHE
Curvularia lunata [55][78][19][56][86][92] NC-HE, C-NHE
Curvularia pallescens [66][78][19][56] NC-HE, C-NHE
Curvularia spicifera
(syn. Drechslera spicifera)
[20] C-NHE
Curvularia sp. [85] C-NHE
Cutaneotrichosporon Cutaneotrichosporon mucoides
(syn. Trichosporon mucoides)
[72] C-NHE
Cylindrocarpon Cylindrocarpon sp. [45][46] C-HE
Cyphellophora Cyphellophora olivacea [47] C-HE
Cyphellophora sp. [47] C-HE
Cyphellostereum Cyphellostereum sp. [75] C-NHE
Cystoderma Cystoderma sp. [75] C-NHE
Devriesia Devriesia sp. [40] NC-HE
Dichotomophilus Dichotomophilus indicus
(syn. Chaetomium indicum)
[26] C-NHE
Didymella Didymella glomerata
(syn. Phoma glomerata)
[16][52] C-NHE
Dipodascus Dipodascus geotrichum [26] C-NHE
Dipodascus sp.
(syn. Geotrichum sp.)
[59][85] NC-HE, C-NHE
Discostroma Discostroma corticola
(syn. Seimatosporium lichenicola)
[15][68] O-SPE
Drechslera Drechslera sp. [28] O-SPE
Emericella Emericella ruber [19] C-NHE
Emericella sp. [60][85] C-HE, C-NHE
Engyodontium Engyodontium sp. [40][79] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE
Epicoccum Epicoccum nigrum
(syn. Epicoccum purpurascens)
[15][55][19][56][20][60][68][32] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE, O-SPE
Epicoccum sp. [96][28][23][99] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE, O-SPE
Eurotium Eurotium halophilicum [109] C-NHE
Eurotium herbariorum [77] C-HE
Eurotium sp. [59][28][98][100] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE
Exophiala Exophiala angulospora [47][48] C-HE
Exophiala moniliae [43] C-HE
Exophiala sp. [45][47] C-HE
Fomitopsis Fomitopsis vinosa [72] C-NHE
Fusarium Fusarium chlamydosporum [62] C-HE
Fusarium culmorum [19] C-NHE
Fusarium equiseti [64] SC-NHE
Fusarium fujikuroi
(syn. F. moniliforme)
[66][78][56][84] C-HE, NC-HE
Fusarium oxysporum [45][55][19][56][51][20][60][32][76][83][110] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE, SC-NHE
Fusarium proliferatum [87] C-NHE
Fusarium sporotrichioides [51] C-HE
Fusarium sp. [73][45][46][96][19][17][57][59][21][74][91][24][101][111] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE
Fuscoporia Fuscoporia sp. [75] C-NHE
Fusidium Fusidium viride [31] C-NHE
Ganoderma Ganoderma sp. [75] C-NHE
Gliomastix Gliomastix tumulicola
(syn. Acremonium tumulicola)
[45][54] C-HE
Gliomastix sp. [32][104] C-HE
Gloiothele Gloiothele sp. [75] C-NHE
Helminthosporium Helminthosporium sp. [28][85][91] C-NHE, O-SPE
Humicola Humicola fuscoatra [60] C-NHE
Humicola udagawae [51] C-HE
Humicola sp. [19] C-NHE
Hyphodontia Hyphodontia alutaria [75] C-NHE
Hyphodontia sp. [75] C-NHE
Hyphodontiella Hyphodontiella sp. [75] C-NHE
Hypholoma Hypholoma sp. [75] C-NHE
Idriella Idriella sp. [32] C-HE
Kendrickiella Kendrickiella phycomyces [45][46][112] C-HE
Kernia Kernia geniculotricha [76] SC-NHE
Kernia hippocrepida [76] SC-NHE
Lactarius Lactarius sp. [75] C-NHE
Lecanicillium Lecanicillium psalliotae [51][69] C-HE, NC-HE
Lecanicillium sp. [77] C-HE
Leptobacillium Leptobacillium muralicola [50] NC-HE
Leptosphaeria Leptosphaeria sp. [28] O-SPE
Leptosphaerulina Leptosphaerulina sp. [74] NC-HE
Macrophomina Macrophomina phaseolina [55][19][56] NC-HE
Malbranchea Malbranchea sp. [20] C-NHE
Mammaria Mammaria echinobotryoides [92] C-HE
Memnoniella Memnoniella sp. [19] C-NHE
Metapochonia Metapochonia bulbillosa
(syn. Verticillium bulbillosum)
[59] C-HE, NC-HE
Metapochonia suchlasporia
(syn. Verticillium suchlasporium)
[63] NC-HE, C-NHE
Meyerozyma Meyerozyma guilliermondii [70] NC-HE
Microascus Microascus brevicaulis
(syn. Scopulariopsis brevicaulis)
[16][63][77] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE
Microascus chartarum
(syn. Scopulariopsis chartarum)
[21] NC-HE, C-NHE
Microascus cirrosus [76] SC-NHE
Microascus sp. [77] C-HE
Microdochium Microdochium lycopodinum [51] C-HE
Monilinia Monilinia sp.
(syn. Monilia sp.)
[91] C-NHE
Monocillium Monocillium-like [45] C-HE
Monodictys Monodictys castaneae
(syn. Stemphylium macrosporoideum)
[16] C-NHE
Monodictys sp. [19][32] C-HE, C-NHE
Mortierell Mortierella alpina [59] NC-HE
Mortierella ambigua [51] C-HE
Mortierella parvispora
(syn. M. gracilis)
[19] C-NHE
Mortierella sp. [59][32] C-HE, NC-HE
Mucor Mucor plumbeus
(syn. M. spinosus)
[16] C-NHE
Mucor racemosus
(syn. M. globosus)
[55][56][59][70] NC-HE
Mucor silvaticus [55][56] NC-HE
Mucor sp. [45][20][32][74][91][49] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE
Myxotrichum Myxotrichum stipitatum [20] C-NHE
Myxotrichum sp. [20] C-NHE
Nectria Nectria sp. [11] C-NHE
Neocosmospora Neocosmospora solani
(syn. Fusarium solani)
[45][55][19][86][104][110] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE
Neodevriesia Neodevriesia modesta
(syn. Devriesia modesta)
[41][42] O-SPE
Neodevriesia simplex
(syn. Devriesia simplex)
[41][42] O-SPE
Neodevriesia sp. [40] NC-HE
Neosartorya Neosartorya sp. [21] NC-HE, C-NHE
Neosetophoma Neosetophoma cerealis
(syn. Coniothyrium cerealis)
[79] C-NHE
Neurospora Neurospora intermedia [86] C-NHE
Neurospora sp. [91] C-NHE
Nigrospora Nigrospora oryzae
(syn. N. sphaerica)
[55][56][91] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE
Nigrospora sp. [55][91] NC-HE, C-NHE
Oidiodendron Oidiodendron cereale [79] C-NHE
Oidiodendron tenuissimum [60] C-NHE
Ophiostoma Ophiostoma sp. [45] C-HE
Paecilomyces Paecilomyces variotii [55][66][78][19][56][71] NC-HE, C-NHE
Paecilomyces sp. [96][20][77][85][91][104] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE
Parengyodontium Parengyodontium album
(syn. Beauveria albaTritirachium album, and Engyodontium album)
[12][16][17][52][53][47][57][31][63][69][77][101][108][33][113][114] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE
Penicillium Penicillium aethiopicum [76] SC-NHE
Penicillium albicans [49] C-NHE
Penicillium aurantiogriseum
(syn. P. verrucosum var. cyclopium)
[12][53][57][62] C-HE, C-NHE
Penicillium brevicompactum [17][52][20][77][79][101] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE
Penicillium camemberti [49] C-NHE
Penicillium canescens
(syn. P. raciborski)
[52][49] C-NHE
Penicillium carneum [76] SC-NHE
Penicillium chrysogenum
(syn. P. notatum)
[12][16][52][53][20][62][67][70][76][79][90][23][49][115][116] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE, SC-NHE
Penicillium citreonigrum
(syn. P. citreoviride)
[27][32] C-HE, O-SPE
Penicillium citrinum [19][56][52][32][86][49] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE
Penicillium commune [62][64][77][49] C-HE, C-NHE, SC-NHE
Penicillium concentricum [76] SC-NHE
Penicillium coprobium [76] SC-NHE
Penicillium corylophilum [58][24] C-NHE
Penicillium daleae [24] C-NHE
Penicillium decumbens [12][52][49] C-NHE
Penicillium dierckxii
(syn. P. fellutanum)
[20] C-NHE
Penicillium digitatum [75] C-NHE
Penicillium dipodomyicola [76] SC-NHE
Penicillium expansum [20][60] C-NHE
Penicillium fuscoglaucum [70] C-NHE
Penicillium glabrum
(syn. P. frequentans)
[12][17][20][60][75][49][101] NC-HE, C-NHE
Penicillium granulatum [19] C-NHE
Penicillium griseofulvum [20][68][35][76] C-NHE, SC-NHE
Penicillium herquei [20] C-NHE
Penicillium italicum [64] SC-NHE
Penicillium javanicum
(syn. Eupenicillium javanicum)
[21] NC-HE, C-NHE
Penicillium lanosum [15][68][105] NC-HE, O-SPE
Penicillium lilacinum [16][26] C-NHE
Penicillium meleagrinum [51][79] C-HE, C-NHE
Penicillium miczynskii [59] SC-NHE
Penicillium olsonii [62] C-HE
Penicillium oxalicum [60][32] C-HE, C-NHE
Penicillium pancosmium [51] C-HE
Penicillium paneum [45][76][117] C-HE, SC-NHE
Penicillium polonicum [62] C-HE
Penicillium purpurescens [19] C-NHE
Penicillium purpurogenum [79][49] C-NHE
Penicillium restrictum [49] C-NHE
Penicillium simplicissimum (syn. P. janthinellum) [32][49] C-HE, C-NHE
Penicillium spinulosum
(syn. P. nigricans)
[12][52][93] C-HE, C-NHE
Penicillium thomii [49] C-NHE
Penicillium turbatum [64] SC-NHE
Penicillium verrucosum [17][20] C-NHE
Penicillium vulpinum [76] SC-NHE
Penicillium sp. [18][11][95][25][45][46][65][55][19][57][58][40][20][59][31][32][71][74][75][80][85][87][22][89][91][94][97][98][99][24][101][106] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE
Pestalotia Pestalotia sp. [65] C-NHE
Phialophora Phialophora sp. [45][46][57][59] C-HE, C-NHE
Phlebia Phlebia sp. [75] C-NHE
Pholiota Pholiota sp. [75] C-NHE
Phoma Phoma sp. [45][19] C-HE, C-NHE
Physalacria Physalacria sp. [75] C-NHE
Pleospora Pleospora sp. [28] O-SPE
Postia Postia sp. [75] C-NHE
Preussia Preussia terricola [77] C-HE
Preussia sp. [77] C-HE
Pseudogymnoascus Pseudogymnoascus pannorum
(syn. Geomyces pannorum and Chrysosporium pannorum)
[17][57][31] C-NHE
Pseudozyma Pseudozyma prolifica [62] C-HE
Purpureocillium Purpureocillium lilacinus
(syn. Paecilomyces lilacinus)
[25][51][60] C-HE, C-NHE
Pyrenophora Pyrenophora biseptata
(syn. Drechslera biseptata)
[55][56] NC-HE
Radulomyces Radulomyces sp. [75] C-NHE
Rhinocladiella Rhinocladiella-like [45] C-HE
Rhizoctonia Rhizoctonia solani (syn. Thanatephorus cucumeris) [15][55][56][68] NC-HE, O-SPE
Rhizopus Rhizopus stolonifer
(syn. R. nigricans)
[55][19][56][64][35][83][84] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE
Rhizopus sp. [96][106] NC-HE, C-NHE
Rhodotorula Rhodotorula glutinis [60] C-NHE
Rhodotorula mucilaginosa [75] C-NHE
Rhodotorula sp. [11][95][75][79][89][24] C-NHE
Russula Russula sp. [75] C-NHE
Sagenomella Sagenomella griseoviridis [46] C-HE
Sagenomella striatispora [46] C-HE
Sagenomella sp. [58] NC-HE
Sarocladium Sarocladium bacillisporum
(syn. Acremonium bacillisporum)
[101] NC-HE
Sarocladium kiliense
(syn. Acremonium kiliense)
[16][63] NC-HE, C-NHE
Sarocladium strictum
(syn. Acremonium cfr. strictum)
[45][63] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE
Schizophyllum Schizophyllum commune [74] C-NHE
Schizophyllum sp. [76] C-NHE
Schizopora Schizopora paradoxa
(syn. Hyphodontia paradoxa)
[74] C-NHE
Scolecobasidium Scolecobasidium anomalum
(syn. Ochroconis anomala)
[44] C-HE
Scolecobasidium lascauxensis [43][44] C-HE
Scolecobasidium tshawytschae
(syn. Ochroconis tshawytschae
[20] C-NHE
Scopulariopsis Scopulariopsis brevicaulis [16][26] C-NHE
Scopulariopsis fusca [17] C-NHE
Scopulariopsis sp. [20][59][90][99] NC-HE, C-NHE
Scytalidium Scytalidium sp. [80][81] C-NHE
Simplicillium Simplicillium lamellicola
(syn. Verticillium lamellicola)
[31] C-NHE
Skeletocutis Skeletocutis sp. [76] C-NHE
Sordaria Sordaria humana [55][56] NC-HE
Sphaerostilbella Sphaerostilbella sp.
(syn. Gliocladium sp.)
[45][49][104] C-HE, C-NHE
Sporothrix Sporothrix sp. [58][24] NC-HE, C-NHE
Sporotrichum Sporotrichum sp. [53][57] C-NHE
Stachybotrys Stachybotrys chartarum
(syn. S. atra)
[16][19][31][67][93] NC-HE, C-NHE
Stachybotrys cylindrosporus [16] C-NHE
Stachybotrys echinatus
(syn. Memnoniella echinata)
[55][19][56] NC-HE
Stachybotrys sp. [12][96][19] NC-HE, C-NHE
Stagonosporopsis Stagonosporopsis lupini [70] C-NHE
Stemphylium Stemphylium botryosum [53] C-NHE
Stemphylium pyriforme [26] C-NHE
Stemphylium sp. [49] C-NHE
Stereum Stereum sp. [75] C-NHE
Syncephalastrum Syncephalastrum sp. [85] C-NHE
Talaromyces Talaromyces aculeatus [62] C-HE
Talaromyces flavus [51][79] C-HE
Talaromyces pinophilus
(syn. Penicillium pinophilum)
[67][101] C-HE, NC-HE
Talaromyces rugulosus
(syn. Penicillium rugulosum)
[77][79][116] C-HE, C-NHE
Talaromyces variabilis
(syn. Penicillium variabile)
[79] C-NHE
Thysanorea Thysanorea papuana [43] C-HE
Tilletiopsis Tilletiopsis sp. [79] C-NHE
Torrubiella Torrubiella alba
(syn. Lecanicillium aranearum)
[101] NC-HE
Torrubiella sp. [77][101] C-HE, NC-HE
Torula Torula herbarum [26] C-NHE
Torula sp. [20] C-NHE
Tricharina Tricharina sp. [74] NC-HE
Trichocladium Trichocladium asperum [77] C-HE
Trichoderma Trichoderma harzianum [66][78][19][56][79] NC-HE, C-NHE
Trichoderma sect. Longibrachiatum [45][110] C-HE
Trichoderma virens
(syn. Gliocladium virens)
[32] C-HE
Trichoderma viride [45][26][32] C-HE, C-NHE
Trichoderma sp. [25][45][46][19][58][59][85][91][43][102][104] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE
Trichothecium Trichothecium indicum
(syn. Acremonium indicum)
[55][19][56] NC-HE
Trichothecium roseum [16][100] C-NHE
Tritirachium Tritirachium sp. [76][91] C-HE, C-NHE
Tubaria Tubaria sp. [75] C-NHE
Tyromyces Tyromyces sp. [75] C-NHE
Umbelopsis Umbelopsis ramanniana
(syn. Mortierella ramanniana)
[17][59] NC-HE, C-NHE
Venturia Venturia carpophila
(syn. Cladosporium carpophilum)
[56] NC-HE
Verticillium Verticillium alboatrum [56] NC-HE
Verticillium sp. [45][31][63][32][104] C-HE, NC-HE, C-NHE
Wallemia Wallemia sebi [72] C-NHE
Wallemia sp. [100] C-NHE
Westerdykella Westerdykella sp. [74] NC-HE
Xylodon Xylodon nespoli [75] C-NHE
Xylodon nothofagi [75] C-NHE
Xylodon raduloides [75] C-NHE
Zygosporium Zygosporium masoni [45] C-HE
  Basidiomycota (Phylum) [74] NC-HE
  Black meristematic fungi [5][41][118] NC-HE, O-SPE
  Chaetomiaceae (Family) [74] NC-HE
  Filobasidiales [74] NC-HE
  Hyaline sterile mycelia [21] NC-HE, C-NHE
  Melanized sterile mycelia [21] NC-HE, C-NHE
  Pezizomycotina (Subphylum) [74] NC-HE
  Undetermined dark pigmented fungi [14] O-SPE
  Undetermined yeasts [20] C-NHE
  Uredinales (Order) [28] O-SPE
  Ustilaginales (Order) [28] O-SPE

3. Geographic Distribution

Considering the geographic distribution of the data, just one site among the studied paintings comes from the Americas (the Cathedral of Havana at Cuba) [91]. The highest records were from Europe, with 70 monuments with a considerable prevalence of Italian monuments (39). A total of 26 monuments were from Asia, and the 13 from Africa were all from Egypt.

This distribution arises from the Euro-Mediterranean area starting from the old prehistoric caves to the Etruscan and Greek-Roman traditions until the decoration of Christian churches and historical buildings [2]. In the case of the Egyptian area, the recorded taxa derived from the old tombs of the Pharaohs [67][82][83][87][22], and similarly in East Asia, where paintings are mainly found in kings’ and Emperors’ tombs [45][46][54][51].

Researchers' results suggest that the monuments studied were often confined to restricted geographic areas. In any case, a wider geographic distribution than that recorded may be possible, as some sites/ studies could have escaped the search because of language barriers search. [link with Figure 1]

Figure 1. Geographic distribution of the reviewed study’s 107 monuments. Nations are indicated with the international alpha-3 code: ITA: Italy, EGY: Egypt, THA: Thailand, PRT: Portugal, CHN: China, ROU: Romania, AUT: Austria, GER: Germany, JAP: Japan, IND: India, RUS: Russian Federation, ESP: Spain, SRB: Republic of Serbia, CUB: Cuba, FRA: France, KOR: Republic of Korea, SVK: Slovak Republic, CHE: Swiss, GBR: Great Britain. In the blue rectangle Cuba.

4. Isolation and Identification Methods

Culture-based methods favor the growth of microorganisms best fitting with the laboratory conditions used (namely, culture media, temperatures, and incubation times). In this entry, researchers found that the most frequent experimental settings were favorable to fast-growing, highly-sporulating fungi, using culture media rich in easily accessible carbon sources, alongside short incubation times and optimal growth temperatures favoring their sporulation. Otherwise, lower growth temperatures (≤20 °C), wide temperature ranges, different isolation media, and a longer incubation time could enlarge the detectable culturable fraction.

Morphological identification was dominant since the early 2000s when molecular phylogenetic methods have been applied. This allowed a better understanding of the kingdom of Fungi, highlighting also a number of misidentifications [119]. Nowadays, the identification by barcode regions sequencing is a common practice. Even if the nuclear ITS region has been recognized as a fungal barcode, its discriminating power changes within the taxonomical groups and other/more barcode regions are often necessary for a reliable identification [120]. This is the case of the identification of species within large groups, as Fusarium, Penicillium, Aspergillus, and Cladosporium genera, where cryptic species can be detected only by sequencing multiple molecular markers [121].

In detail, Fusarium species determination has been best made with the combined phylogeny of protein-coding genes such as elongation factor (TEF1), RNA polymerase (RPB2) and the partial β-tubulin (BT2) gene [121]. To discriminate between Penicillium andAspergillus species, β-tubulin (BT2) and calmodulin (cmdA) genes have been proposed as secondary barcodes, respectively [122][123]. While the most phylogenetic informative markers for Cladosporium were TEF1 and actin gene (actA), being ITS sequences identical for species of the same complex [124][125].

The correct identification of strains is required in order to provide restorers more information about strains’ ecology and degradative potential. In this light, standardized identification protocols should be implemented.

High throughput sequencing methods have recently been applied to cultural heritage purposes. These methods represent a powerful tool to define the whole fungal diversity present but not necessarily to deepen the mechanisms and the main actors of the deterioration phenomena [126]. The combination of culture-based and molecular methods should be used to better understand deterioration processes. Indeed, pure cultured microorganisms represent the key to uncovering settlers’ physiological and ecological traits and represent a resource for many in silico applications and barcoded identifications [39][127].

5. Distribution of Taxa in the Different Environments

Wall paintings in confined non-hypogean environments, characterized by varied thermo-hygrometric temperatures and air movement, were quite frequent. Hypogean (both confined and non-confined), where nutrients and humidity can favor fungal growth, were also represented.

Temperature and relative humidity are among the environmental parameters most important to microbial colonization capability, and in the case of heterotrophs, a certain amount of nutrients is also needed [4][128]. The low values of temperatures, even if are not favorable for microbial growth by themselves, have a positive effect in contributing the increase in humidity, favoring water condensation on surfaces. Walls, especially in hypogean environments, generally provide these requirements [1]. Temperatures in confined environments are generally more stable than in non-confined environments, where daily and seasonal changes may occur, with ranges that affect the microbial settlement.

Elevated moisture values and stable temperatures have been reported as ideally suited to promote microbial growth on surfaces in catacombs sites [6][101][129]. Indeed, the highest risk occurs when high humidity is coupled with high temperature values, and negative effects of rising temperatures arise only if their highest values can strongly influence the humidity values [130].

Air movement differences between confined, semi-confined, and non-confined environments were expected to alter the number and type of fungal species recorded as well as incoming nutrients from the outside environment. A great proportion of entries in the database belonged to soil and litter dwellers such as saprotrophs, producing numerous spores that are well adapted to air-borne dispersal, and therefore, air ventilation may have a significant impact on the risk of contamination [131]. The more limited air volume movement of confined mural paintings than semi-confined ones was suggested to decrease the number of air-borne dust particles, with biofilm communities relying more on internal interactions between different microorganisms than on the external organic inputs [14].

Among the first aerobiological studies, Savulescu and Ionita reported a greater number of isolates inside the studied monasteries than outside of them, probably due to a more favorable microclimate inside the church, which favors the development of microorganisms [26]. Pangallo and colleagues proposed for the first time a comparative analysis of the microbial component of paintings and the surrounding air to gather information on the origin of fungal contamination [80]. Aside from the importance of aerobiological studies for conserving and preventing microbial attacks on indoor painted surfaces [132], these studies have received little attention. In light of the large number of fungal species potentially harmful for restorers and visitors, constant monitoring of air spore quality and concentration, as well as the use of air filters to reduce fungal spores concentrations, would be required for site conservation [21][106][132][133].

Significant correlations between taxa and the various environmental categories have not been recorded. Indeed, such data is not the result of the absence of a correlation between fungal growths and environmental conditions but can be considered as a direct consequence of several other influencing conditions that hide it. In fact, many are the ecological requirements that shape the ecological niches of the different species (i.e., the limiting factors), but the most conditioning factors are those that result in a quantity proximal to the upper or lower tolerance limit of an organism [134]. Then, for the various sites examined, some factors may become more relevant if their values are closer to the tolerance limit of certain organism, but this does not mean that other parameters do not play a role [135].

Indeed, researchers' results may be influenced by a number of variables. The different sampling techniques and isolation conditions but also the presence of numerous genera that are widespread and highly sporulating and hence present in all the environmental categories must also be considered. Moreover, the absence of evident correlations could have been determined by the absence of distinct boundaries between the categories identified, with overlapping microclimatic conditions resulting in overlaps within their respective microbial communities. Finally, the heterogeneity of the data, with taxa identified at the genus or species level, may have resulted in dispersed clusters and hampered the ability to demonstrate any relationship.

This result seems to be in line with other studies. The influence of environmental factors such as temperature, relative humidity, and the opening or closure of the temples was not evident for fungal growths on wall paintings of 12 archaeological sites in the central and western parts of Thailand [86]. Furthermore, a stronger relationship with the age of five caves in China than with the environmental conditions, such as temperature and relative humidity, was proposed to explain the observed differences in fungal communities [74]. In two distinct mural paintings, instead, the differences recorded in the microbial communities were associated to the different organic input origin (i.e., wine cellar evaporation and insect exuvia/excrements) and the microclimatic conditions. The more humid conditions favored the growth of actinomycetes, bacteria, and dark-pigmented fungi, while the other showed a biofilm, mainly dominated by xerotolerant and patchy growing sporulating fungi [14]. Differences in fungal communities were also recorded on mural paintings of two subterranean ancient Chinese tombs dating back over 1700 years, mostly due to variations in interior temperature and relative humidity and their history and drawing techniques [62].

Other significant concerns could be related to identifying the isolated species, which was initially based solely on morphological observation. Indeed, nowadays, phylogenetic molecular approaches are routinely applied, providing a universal tool for identifying fungal species accurately.

New methodologies such as omics techniques are now available; however, they rarely provide information at the species or genus level, and there is no guarantee that the recorded taxa are actively growing. Moreover, culture-dependent approaches may not provide a real picture of the microbial diversity actively growing at the sampling time. Therefore, a combination of culture-based and molecular approaches may be needed to gain a clear picture of the actual biodiversity present on the painted surfaces as well as to have strains to investigate their potential degradative roles.


  1. Garg, K.L.; Jain, K.K.; Mishra, A.K. Role of fungi in the deterioration of wall paintings. Sci. Total Environ. 1995, 167, 255–271.
  2. Mora, P.; Mora, L.; Philippot, P. The Conservation of Wall Paintings; Butterworths: London, UK, 1984; 576p.
  3. Giannini, C.; Tapete, D. Materiali e procedimenti esecutivi della pittura murale. In Il Laboratorio dell’Arte, Fonti e Ricerche per la Storia delle Tecniche Artistiche; Il Prato: Saonara, Italy, 2009; Volume 2, 160p.
  4. Caneva, G.; Nugari, M.P.; Nugari, M.P.; Salvadori, O. Plant Biology for Cultural Heritage: Biodeterioration and Conservation; Getty Publications: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2008.
  5. Caneva, G.; Bartoli, F.; Fontani, M.; Mazzeschi, D.; Visca, P. Changes in biodeterioration patterns of mural paintings: Multi-temporal mapping for a preventive conservation strategy in the Crypt of the Original Sin (Matera, Italy). J. Cult. Herit. 2019, 40, 59–68.
  6. Albertano, P.; Urzì, C. Structural interactions among epilithic cyanobacteria and heterotrophic microorganisms in Roman hypogea. Microb. Ecol. 1999, 38, 244–252.
  7. Ranalli, G.; Zanardini, E.; Andreotti, A.; Colombini, M.P.; Corti, C.; Bosch-Roig, P.; De Nuntiis, P.; Lustrato, G.; Mandrioli, P.; Rampazzi, L.; et al. Hi-tech restoration by two-steps biocleaning process of Triumph of Death fresco at the Camposanto Monumental Cemetery (Pisa, Italy). J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 125, 800–812.
  8. Sterflinger, K. Fungi: Their role in deterioration of cultural heritage. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2010, 24, 47–55.
  9. Vanderwolf, K.J.; Malloch, D.; McAlpine, D.F.; Forbes, G.J. A world review of fungi, yeasts, and slime molds in caves. Int. J. Speleol. 2013, 42, 77–96.
  10. Sterflinger, K.; Piñar, G. Microbial deterioration of cultural heritage and works of art—Tilting at windmills? Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2013, 97, 9637–9646.
  11. Rosado, T.; Gil, M.; Mirão, J.; Candeias, A.; Caldeira, A.T. Oxalate biofilm formation in mural paintings due to microorganisms—A comprehensive study. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2013, 85, 1–7.
  12. Sáiz-Jiménez, C.; Samson, R.A. Biodegradacion de obras de arte. Hongos implicados en la degradacion de los frescos del monasterio de la Rabida (Huelva). Bot. Macaronesica 1981, 8–9, 255–264.
  13. Ciferri, O. Microbial degradation of paintings. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 879–885.
  14. Dornieden, T.; Gorbushina, A.A.; Krumbein, W.E. Biodecay of cultural heritage as a space/time-related ecological situation—An evaluation of a series of studies. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2000, 46, 261–270.
  15. Unković, N.; Dimkić, I.; Stupar, M.; Stanković, S.; Vukojević, J.; Ljaljević Grbić, M. Biodegradative potential of fungal isolates from sacral ambient: In vitro study as risk assessment implication for the conservation of wall paintings. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0190922.
  16. Ionita, I. Contributions to the study of the biodeterioration of the work of art and of historic monuments. II. Species of fungi involved in the deterioration of mural paintings from the monasteries of Moldavia. Rev. Roum. Biol. Série Bot. 1973, 18, 179–189.
  17. Berner, M.; Wanner, G.; Lubitz, W. A comparative study of the fungal flora present in medieval wall paintings in the chapel of the castle Herberstein and in the parish church of St Georgen in Styria, Austria. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 1997, 40, 53–61.
  18. Gomoiu, I.; Cojoc, R.L.; Enache, M.I.; Neagu, S.E.; Mohanu, D.; Mohanu, I. Microbial ability to colonize mural painting and its substrate. Acta Phys. Polo. A 2018, 134, 383–386.
  19. Dhawan, S. Microbial deterioration of mural paintings. Biodeterior. Mater. 2002, 2, 95–105.
  20. Guglielminetti, M.; De Giuli Morghen, C.; Radaelli, A.; Bistoni, F.; Carruba, G.; Spera, G.; Caretta, G. Mycological and Ultrastructural studies to evaluate biodeterioration of mural paintings. Detection of fungi and mites in frescos of the Monastery of St Damian in Assisi. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 1994, 33, 269–283.
  21. Gorbushina, A.A.; Heyrman, J.; Dornieden, T.; Gonzalez-Delvalle, M.; Krumbein, W.E.; Laiz, L.; Petersen, L.; Saiz-Jimenez, C.; Swings, J. Bacterial and fungal diversity and biodeterioration problems in mural painting environments of St. Martins church (Greene–Kreiensen, Germany). Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2004, 53, 13–24.
  22. Sakr, A.; Ghaly, M.; Helal, G.; Abdel Haliem, M. Effect of thymol against fungi deteriorating mural paintings at Tell Basta tombs, Lower Egypt. Int. J. Res. Stud. Biosci. 2012, 6, 8–23.
  23. Vasanthakumar, A.; DeAraujo, A.; Mazurek, J.; Schilling, M.; Mitchell, R. Microbiological survey for analysis of the brown spots on the walls of the tomb of King Tutankhamun. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2013, 79, 56–63.
  24. Rosado, T.; Mirão, J.; Candeias, A.; Caldeira, A.T. Characterizing microbial diversity and damage in mural paintings. Microsc. Microanal. 2015, 21, 78.
  25. Rosado, T.; Gil, M.; Caldeira, A.T.; Martins, M.D.R.; Dias, C.B.; Carvalho, L.; Mirão, J.; Candeias, A.E. Material characterization and biodegradation assessment of mural paintings: Renaissance frescoes from Santo Aleixo Church, Southern Portugal. Int. J. Architect. Herit. 2015, 8, 835–852.
  26. Savulescu, A.; Ionita, I. Contributions to the study of the biodeterioration of the works of art and historic monuments, I. Species of fungi isolated from frescoes. Rev. Roum. Biol. 1971, 16, 201–206.
  27. Unković, N.; Grbić, M.L.; Stupar, M.; Savković, Ž.; Jelikić, A.; Stanojević, D.; Vukojević, J. Fungal-induced deterioration of mural paintings: In situ and mock-model microscopy analyses. Microsc. Microanal. 2016, 22, 410–421.
  28. Unković, N.; Ljaljević Grbić, M.; Subakov-Simić, G.; Stupar, M.; Vukojević, J.; Jelikić, A.; Stanojević, D. Biodeteriogenic and toxigenic agents on 17th century mural paintings and facade of the old church of the Holy Ascension (Veliki Krčimir, Serbia). Indoor Built Environ. 2015, 25, 826–837.
  29. Unković, N.; Ljaljević Grbić, M.; Stupar, M.; Vukojević, J.; Subakov-Simić, G.; Jelikić, A.; Stanojević, D. ATP bioluminescence method: Tool for rapid screening of organic and microbial contaminants on deteriorated mural paintings. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015, 33, 1061–1069.
  30. Spatafora, J.W.; Aime, M.C.; Grigoriev, I.V.; Martin, F.; Stajich, J.E.; Blackwell, M. The fungal tree of life: From molecular systematics to genome-scale phylogenies. In The Fungal Kingdom; Heitman, J., Howlett, B.J., Crous, P.W., Stukenbrock, E.H., James, T.Y., Gow, N.A.R., Eds.; ASM press: Washington, DC, USA, 2007; pp. 1–34.
  31. Karpovich-Tate, N.; Rebrikova, N.L. Microbial communities on damaged frescoes and building materials in the cathedral of the Nativity of the Virgin in the Pafnutii-Borovskii monastery, Russia. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 1991, 27, 281–296.
  32. Emoto, Y. Microbiological investigation of ancient tombs with paintings: Ozuka tomb in Fukuoka and Chibusan tomb in Kumamoto. Sci. Conserv. 1974, 12, 95–102.
  33. Nugari, M.P.; Pietrini, A.M.; Caneva, G.; Imperi, F.; Visca, P. Biodeterioration of mural paintings in a rocky habitat: The Crypt of the Original Sin (Matera, Italy). Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2009, 63, 705–711.
  34. Jurado, V.; Sanchez-Moral, S.; Saiz-Jimenez, C. Entomogenous fungi and the conservation of the cultural heritage: A review. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2008, 62, 325–330.
  35. Mishra, A.K.; Garg, K.L. Microbial deterioration of wall paintings. In Biodeterioration of Cultural Property 3, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Biodeterioration of Cultural Property, Bangkok, Thailand, 4–7 July 1995; Conservation Science Division, Office of Archaeology and National Museums: Bangkok, Thailand, 1995; pp. 630–642.
  36. Isola, D.; Bartoli, F.; Langone, S.; Ceschin, S.; Zucconi, L.; Caneva, G. Plant DNA barcode as a tool for root identification in hypogea: The Case of the Etruscan Tombs of Tarquinia (Central Italy). Plants 2021, 10, 1138.
  37. Cuzman, O.A.; Tapete, D.; Fratini, F.; Mazzei, B.; Riminesi, C.; Tiano, P. Assessing and facing the biodeteriogenic presence developed in the Roman Catacombs of Santi Marco, Marcelliano e Damaso, Italy. Eur. J. Sci. Theol. 2014, 10, 185–197.
  38. Isola, D.; Selbmann, L.; Meloni, P.; Maracci, E.; Onofri, S.; Zucconi, L. Detrimental rock black fungi and biocides: A study on the Monumental Cemetery of Cagliari. In Science and Technology for the Conservation of Cultural Heritage; Rogerio-Candelera, M.A., Lazzari, M., Cano, E., Eds.; CRC Press: London, UK, 2013; pp. 83–86.
  39. Isola, D.; Bartoli, F.; Meloni, P.; Caneva, G.; Zucconi, L. Black fungi and stone heritage conservation: Ecological and metabolic assays for evaluating colonization potential and responses to traditional biocides. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2038.
  40. He, D.; Wu, F.; Ma, W.; Zhang, Y.; Gu, J.-D.; Duan, Y.; Xu, R.; Feng, H.; Wang, W.; Li, S.-W. Insights into the bacterial and fungal communities and microbiome that causes a microbe outbreak on ancient wall paintings in the Maijishan Grottoes. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2021, 163, 105250.
  41. Zucconi, L.; Gagliardi, M.; Isola, D.; Onofri, S.; Andaloro, M.C.; Pelosi, C.; Pogliani, C.; Selbmann, L. Biodeterioration agents dwelling in or on the wall paintings of the Holy Saviour’s cave (Vallerano, Italy). Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2012, 70, 40–46.
  42. Egidi, E.; de Hoog, G.S.; Isola, D.; Onofri, S.; Quaedvlieg, W.; de Vries, M.; Stielow, J.B.; Zucconi, L.; Selbmann, L. Phylogeny and taxonomy of meristematic rock-inhabiting black fungi in the Dothideomycetes based on multi-locus phylogenies. Fungal Divers. 2014, 65, 127–165.
  43. Martin-Sanchez, P.M.; Nováková, A.; Bastian, F.; Alabouvette, C.; Saiz-Jimenez, C. Use of biocides for the control of fungal outbreaks in subterranean environments: The case of the Lascaux Cave in France. Envir. Sci. Tech. 2012, 46, 3762–3770.
  44. Martin-Sanchez, P.M.; Nováková, A.; Bastian, F.; Alabouvette, C.; Saiz-Jimenez, C. Two new species of the genus Ochroconis, O. lascauxensis and O. anomala isolated from black stains in Lascaux Cave, France. Fungal Biol. 2012, 116, 574–589.
  45. Sugiyama, J.; Kiyuna, T.; An, K.D.; Nagatsuka, Y.; Handa, Y.; Tazato, N.; Hata-Tomita, J.; Nishijima, M.; Koide, T.; Yaguchi, Y.; et al. Microbiological survey of the stone chambers of Takamatsuzuka and Kitora tumuli, Nara Prefecture, Japan: A milestone in elucidating the cause of biodeterioration of mural paintings. In Proceedings of the 31st International Symposium on the Conservation and Restoration of Cultural Property—Study of Environmental Conditions Surrounding Cultural Properties and Their Protective Measures, Tokyo, Japan, 5–7 February 2008; pp. 51–73. Available online: (accessed on 31 January 2022).
  46. Sugiyama, J.; Kiyuna, T.; Nishijima, M.; An, K.D.; Nagatsuka, Y.; Tazato, N.; Handa, Y.; Handa-Tomita, J.; Sato, Y.; Kigawa, R.; et al. Polyphasic insights into the microbiomes of the Takamatsuzuka tumulus and Kitora tumulus. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 63, 63–113.
  47. Isola, D.; Zucconi, L.; Cecchini, A.; Caneva, G. Dark-pigmented biodeteriogenic fungi in Etruscan tombs: New data on their culture dependent diversity and favouring conditions. Fungal Biol. 2021, 125, 609–620.
  48. Kiyuna, T.; An, K.D.; Kigawa, R.; Sano, C.; Sugiyama, J. Two new Cladophialophora species, C. tumbae sp. nov. and C. tumulicola sp. nov., and chaetothyrialean fungi from biodeteriorated samples in the Takamatsuzuka and Kitora Tumuli. Mycoscience 2018, 59, 75–84.
  49. Gargani, G. Fungus contamination of Florence art masterpieces before and after the 1966 disaster. In Biodeterioration of Materials, Microbiological and Allied Aspects; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1968; pp. 252–257.
  50. Sun, J.Z.; Ge, Q.Y.; Zhu, Z.B.; Zhang, X.L.; Liu, X.Z. Three dominating hypocrealean fungi of the ‘white mold spots’ on acrylic varnish coatings of the murals in a Koguryo tomb in China. Phytotaxa 2019, 397, 225–236.
  51. Jeong, S.H.; Lee, H.J.; Lee, M.Y.; Chung, Y.J. Conservation environment for mural tomb in Goa-ri, Goryeong. J. Cons. Sci. 2017, 33, 189–201.
  52. Sáiz-Jiménez, C.; Samson, R.A. Microorganisms and environmental pollution as deteriorating agents of the frescoes of the Monastery of “Santa María de la Rábida”, Huelva, Spain. In Proceedings of the ICOM, Committee for Conservation, 6th Triennial Meeting, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 21–25 September 1981.
  53. Rebricova, N.L. Some ecological aspects of protection of old Russian wall paintings from microbiological deterioration. In Biodeterioration of Cultural Property; Agrawal, O.P., Dhawan, S., Eds.; Macmillan: New Delhi, India, 1991; pp. 294–306.
  54. Kiyuna, T.; An, K.D.; Kigawa, R.; Sano, C.; Miura, S.; Sugiyama, J. Molecular assessment of fungi in “black spots” that deface murals in the Takamatsuzuka and Kitora Tumuli in Japan: Acremonium sect. Gliomastix including Acremonium tumulicola sp. nov. and Acremonium felinum comb. nov. Mycoscience 2011, 52, 1–17.
  55. Agrawal, O.P.; Dhawan, S.; Garg, K.L.; Shaheen, F.; Pathak, N.; Misra, A. Study of biodeterioration of the Ajanta wall paintings. Int. Biodeterior. 1988, 24, 121–129.
  56. Dhawan, S.; Garg, K.L.; Pathak, N. Microbial analysis of Ajanta wall paintings & their possible control in situ. In Biodeterioration of Cultural Property, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference, Yokohama, Japan, 5–8 October 1992; International Communications Specialists: Tokyo, Japan, 1993; Volume 2, pp. 245–262.
  57. Rebricova, N.L. Micromycetes taking part in deterioration of old Russian wall paintings. In Recent Advances in Biodeterioration and Biodegradation. Biodeterioration of Cultural Heritage; Naya Prokash: Calcutta, India, 1993; Volume 1, pp. 205–232.
  58. Martins, R.; Fialho, S.; Lima, M.; Tavares, D.; Mirão, J.; Valadas, S.; Candeias, A.E. Biodegradation assessment of a 16th century fresco from Southern Portugal. Microsc. Microanal. 2009, 15, 65–66.
  59. Agarossi, G.; Ferrari, R.; Monte, M. Biocides in the control of biodeterioration. In The Conservation of Monuments in the Mediterranean Basin, Proceedings of the First International Symposium, 7–10 June Bari, Italy, 1989; Grafo Edizioni: Brescia, Italy, 1990; pp. 511–517.
  60. Crippa, A. Funghi isolati da affreschi murali in antiche chiese di Pavia. In Atti Società Italiana Scienze Naturali Museo Civico Storia Naturale Milano; 1983; Volume 124, pp. 3–10. Available online: (accessed on 31 January 2022).
  61. Sorlini, C.; Sacchi, M.; Ferrari, A. Microbiological deterioration of Gambara’s frescoes exposed to open air in Brescia, Italy. Int. Biodeter. 1987, 23, 167–179.
  62. Ma, W.; Wu, F.; Tian, T.; He, D.; Zhang, Q.; Gu, J.-D.; Duand, Y.; Mae, D.; Wang, W.; Feng, H. Fungal diversity and its contribution to the biodeterioration of mural paintings in two 1700-year-old tombs of China. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2020, 152, 104972.
  63. Gorbushina, A.A.; Petersen, K. Distribution of microorganisms on ancient wall paintings as related to associated faunal elements. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2000, 46, 277–284.
  64. Veneranda, M.; Prieto-Taboada, N.; de Vallejuelo, S.F.O.; Maguregui, M.; Morillas, H.; Marcaida, I.; Castro, K.; Madariaga, J.M.; Osanna, M. Biodeterioration of Pompeian mural paintings: Fungal colonization favoured by the presence of volcanic material residues. Environ. Sci. Poll. Res. 2017, 24, 19599–19608.
  65. Marco, A.; Santos, S.; Caetano, J.; Pintado, M.; Vieira, E.; Moreira, P.R. Basil essential oil as an alternative to commercial biocides against fungi associated with black stains in mural painting. Build. Environ. 2020, 167, 106459.
  66. Garg, K.L.; Dhawan, S.; Bhatnagar, I.K. Microbicides for preservation of wall paintings. In Biodeterioration and Biodegradation; Rossmoore, H.W., Ed.; Elsevier Applied Science: Barking, UK, 1991; Volume 8, pp. 505–507.
  67. Gambino, M.; Ahmed, M.A.A.A.; Villa, F.; Cappitelli, F. Zinc oxide nanoparticles hinder fungal biofilm development in an ancient Egyptian tomb. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2017, 122, 92–99.
  68. Unković, N.; Erić, S.; Šarić, K.; Stupar, M.; Savković, Ž.; Stanković, S.; Stanojević, O.; Dimkić, I.; Vukojević, J.; Ljaljević Grbić, M. Biogenesis of secondary mycogenic minerals related to wall paintings deterioration process. Micron 2017, 100, 1–9.
  69. Mang, S.M.; Scrano, L.; Camele, I. Preliminary studies on fungal contamination of two rupestrian churches from Matera (Southern Italy). Sustainability 2020, 12, 6988.
  70. Jurado, V.; Gonzalez-Pimentel, J.L.; Hermosin, B.; Saiz-Jimenez, C. Biodeterioration of Salón de Reinos, Museo Nacional del Prado, Madrid, Spain. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 8858.
  71. Stupar, M.; Grbić, M.L.; Simić, G.S.; Jelikić, A.; Vukojević, J.; Sabovljević, M. A sub-aerial biofilms investigation and new approach in biocide application in cultural heritage conservation: Holy Virgin Church (Gradac Monastery, Serbia). Indoor Built Environ. 2012, 23, 584–593.
  72. Ripka, K. Identification of Microorganisms on Stone and Mural Paintings Using Molecular Methods. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wien, Vienna, Austria, 2005; p. 148. Available online: (accessed on 2 December 2021).
  73. Pepe, O.; Sannino, L.; Palomba, S.; Anastasio, M.; Blaiotta, G.; Villani, F.; Moschetti, G. Heterotrophic microorganisms in deteriorated medieval wall paintings in Southern Italian churches. Microbiol. Res. 2010, 165, 21–32.
  74. Ma, Y.; Zhang, H.; Du, Y.; Tian, T.; Xiang, T.; Liu, X.; Wu, F.; An, L.; Wang, W.; Gu, J.-D.; et al. The community distribution of bacteria and fungi on ancient wall paintings of the Mogao Grottoes. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 7752.
  75. Rosado, T.; Mirão, J.; Candeias, A.; Caldeira, A.T. Microbial communities analysis assessed by pyrosequencing—A new approach applied to conservation state studies of mural paintings. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2014, 406, 887–895.
  76. Pepe, O.; Palomba, S.; Sannino, L.; Blaiotta, G.; Ventorino, V.; Moschetti, G.; Villani, F. Characterization in the archaeological excavation site of heterotrophic bacteria and fungi of deteriorated wall painting of Herculaneum in Italy. J. Environ. Biol. 2011, 32, 241–250.
  77. Sprocati, A.R.; Alisi, C.; Tasso, F.; Vedovato, E.; Barbabietola, N.; Cremisini, C. A microbiological survey of the Etruscan Mercareccia tomb (Italy): Contribution of microorganisms to deterioration and restoration. In Art 2008, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on NDT of Art, Jerusalem, Israel, 25–30 May 2008; NDT of Art: Jerusalem, Israel, 2008; 9p.
  78. Dhawan, S.; Misra, A.; Garg, K.L.; Pathak, N. Laboratory evaluation of orto-phenyl-phenol and p-chloro-m-cresol for the control of some fungal forms of Ajanta wall paintings. In Biodeterioration of Cultural Property; Agrawal, O.P., Dhawan, S., Eds.; Macmillan: New Delhi, India, 1991; pp. 313–338.
  79. Sampǒ, S.; Luppi Mosca, A.M. A study of the fungi occurring on 15th century frescoes in Florence, Italy. Int. biodeterior. 1989, 25, 343–353.
  80. Pangallo, D.; Kraková, L.; Chovanová, K.; Šimonovičová, A.; De Leo, F.; Urzì, C. Analysis and comparison of the microflora isolated from fresco surface and from surrounding air environment through molecular and biodegradative assays. World J. Microb. Biot. 2012, 28, 2015–2027.
  81. Pangallo, D.; Chovanová, K.; Šimonovicová, A.; De Leo, F.; Urzì, C. Assessment of the biodeterioration risk of the Ladislav lagend fresco in Velka Lomnica (SK) through non-invasive methods. In Proceedings of the 11th International Congress on Deterioration and Conservation of Stone, Torun, Poland, 15–20 September 2008; Volume 1, pp. 457–464.
  82. Helmi, F.M.; Elmitwalli, H.R.; Rizk, M.A.; Hagrassy, A.F. Antibiotic extraction as a recent biocontrol method for Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus flavus fungi in ancient Egyptian mural paintings. Mediterr. Archaeol. Arc. 2011, 11, 1–7.
  83. Khalaphallah, R.; El-Derby, A.A. The effect of nano-TiO2 and plant extracts on microbial strains isolated from Theban ancient Egyptian royal tomb painting. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2015, 9, 1424–1430.
  84. Elhagrassy, A.F. Isolation and characterization of actinomycetes from mural paintings of Snu-Sert-Ankh tomb, their antimicrobial activity, and their biodeterioration. Microbiol. Res. 2018, 216, 47–55.
  85. Chaisrisook, C.; Suwanarit, P.; Aranyanak, C. Fungal deterioration of mural paintings in the royal temple. In Biodeterioration of Cultural Property 3, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Biodeterioration of Cultural Property, Bangkok, Thailand, 4–7 July 1995; Conservation Science Division, Office of Archaeology and National Museums: Bangkok, Thailand, 1995; pp. 116–137.
  86. Senbua, W.; Wichitwechkarn, J. Molecular identification of fungi colonizing art objects in Thailand and their growth inhibition by local plant extracts. 3 Biotech 2019, 9, 356.
  87. Stoyancheva, G.; Krumova, E.; Kostadinova, N.; Miteva-Staleva, J.; Grozdanov, P.; Ghaly, M.F.; Sakr, A.A.; Angelova, M. Biodiversity of contaminant fungi at different coloured materials in ancient Egypt Tombs and Mosques. Cr. Acad. Bul. Sci. 2018, 71, 907–915.
  88. Raschle, P. Experience of combating moulds during restoration of ceiling paintings in a Swiss baroque monastery church. Biodeterioration 1983, 5, 427–433.
  89. Rosado, T.; Falé, A.; Gil, M.; Mirão, J.; Candeias, A.; Caldeira, A.T. Understanding the influence of microbial contamination on colour alteration of pigments used in wall paintings—The case of red and yellow ochres and ultramarine blue. Color Res. Appl. 2019, 44, 783–789.
  90. Di Carlo, E.; Chisesi, R.; Barresi, G.; Barbaro, S.; Lombardo, G.; Rotolo, V.; Palla, F. Fungi and bacteria in indoor Cultural Heritage environments: Microbial-related risks for artworks and human health. Environ. Ecol. Res. 2016, 4, 257–264.
  91. Cepero, A.; Martinez, P.; Castro, J.; Sanchez, A.; Machado, J. The biodeterioration of cultural property in the republic of Cuba: A review of some experiences. In Biodeterioration of Cultural Property, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference, Yokohama, Japan, 5–8 October 1992; International Communications Specialists: Tokyo, Japan, 1993; pp. 479–487.
  92. Arai, H. Relationship between fungi and brown spots found in various materials. In Biodeterioration of Cultural Property, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference, Yokohama, Japan, 5–8 October 1992; International Communications Specialists: Tokyo, Japan, 1993; pp. 320–336.
  93. Barbieri, N.; Bassi, M.; Dassù, G.; Rossi, F. Gli affreschi del tempio repubblicano di Brescia: Condizioni ambientali ed inquinamento microbiologico. Arte Lomb. 1986, 76/77, 113–117.
  94. Bartolini, M.; Nugari, M.P.; Pietrini, A.M.; Ricci, S.; Roccardi, A.; Filetici, M.G. Gli ambienti ipogei delle domus romane al Celio: Indagini biologiche per il controllo e la prevenzione del biodeterioramento. Kermes La Riv. Del Restauro 2010, 23, 45–54.
  95. Rosado, T.; Martins, M.R.; Pires, M.; Mirão, J.; Candeias, A.; Caldeira, A.T. Enzymatic monitorization of mural paintings biodegradation and biodeterioration. Int. J. Conserv. Sci. 2013, 4, 603–612.
  96. Tilak, S.T. Biodeterioration of paintings in Ajanta. In Biodeterioration of Cultural Property; Agrawal, O.P., Dhawan, S., Eds.; Macmillan: New Delhi, India, 1991; pp. 204–212.
  97. Tonolo, A.; Giacobini, C. Microbiological changes of frescoes. In Recent Advances in Conservation; Thomson, G., Ed.; Butterworths: London, UK, 1961; pp. 62–64.
  98. Arai, H. The environmental analysis of archaeological sites. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 1990, 9, 213–216.
  99. Sorlini, C.; Allievi, L.; Sacchi, M.; Ferrari, A. Microorganisms present in deteriorated materials of the Palazzo della Ragione in Milan. Int. Biodeterior. Bull. 1982, 18, 105–110.
  100. Popescu, A.; Arai, H.; Minatoya, T. Biodeterioration aspects of the Probota Monastery and possibilities for its restoration. In Biodeterioration of Cultural Property 3, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Biodeterioration of Cultural Property, Bangkok, Thailand, 4–7 July 1995; Conservation Science Division, Office of Archaeology and National Museums: Bangkok, Thailand, 1995; pp. 255–271.
  101. Saarela, M.; Alakomi, H.L.; Suihko, M.L.; Maunuksela, L.; Raaska, L.; Mattila-Sandholm, T. Heterotrophic microorganisms in air and biofilm samples from Roman catacombs, with special emphasis on actinobacteria and fungi. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2004, 54, 27–37.
  102. Palla, F.; Billeci, N.; Mancuso, F.P.; Pellegrino, L.; Lorusso, L.C. Microscopy and molecular biology techniques for the study of biocenosis diversity in semi-confined environments. Conserv. Sci. Cult. Herit. 2010, 10, 185–194.
  103. Nagatsuka, Y.; Kiyuna, T.; Kigawa, R.; Sano, C.; Miura, S.; Sugiyama, J. Candida tumulicola sp. nov. and Candida takamatsuzukensis sp. nov., novel yeast species assignable to the Candida membranifaciens clade, isolated from the stone chamber of the Takamatsuzuka tumulus. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 186–194.
  104. Dupont, J.; Jacquet, C.; Dennetiere, B.; Lacoste, S.; Bousta, F.; Orial, G.; Cruaud, C.; Couloux, A.; Roquebert, M.F. Invasion of the French Paleolithic painted cave of Lascaux by members of the Fusarium solani species complex. Mycologia 2007, 99, 526–533.
  105. Bianchi, A.; Favali, M.A.; Barbieri, N.; Bassi, M. The use of fungicides on mold-covered frescoes in S. Eusebio in Pavia. Int. Biodeterior. Bull. 1980, 16, 45–51.
  106. Pitzurra, L.; Bellezza, T.; Giammarioli, M.; Giraldi, M.; Sbaraglia, G.; Spera, G.; Bistoni, F. Microbial environmental monitoring of the refectory in the monastery of St. Anna in Foligno, Italy. Aerobiologia 1999, 15, 203–209.
  107. Bassi, M.; Giacobini, C. Scanning electron microscopy: A new technique in the study of the microbiology of works of art. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2001, 48, 55–66.
  108. Jeffries, P. Biodeterioration of wall paintings in Canterbury Cathedral. In Biodeterioration of Cultural Property; Agrawal, O.P., Dhawan, S., Eds.; Macmillan: Delhi, India, 1991; pp. 287–293.
  109. Fiorillo, F.; Fiorentino, S.; Montanari, M.; Monaco, C.R.; Del Bianco, A.; Vandini, M. Learning from the past, intervening in the present: The role of conservation science in the challenging restoration of the wall painting Marriage at Cana by Luca Longhi (Ravenna, Italy). Herit. Sci. 2020, 8, 10.
  110. Kiyuna, T.; An, K.D.; Kigawa, R.; Sano, C.; Miura, S.; Sugiyama, J. Mycobiota of the Takamatsuzuka and Kitora Tumuli in Japan, focusing on the molecular phylogenetic diversity of Fusarium and Trichoderma. Mycoscience 2008, 49, 298–311.
  111. Stomeo, F.; Portillo, M.C.; Gonzalez, J.M. Assessment of bacterial and fungal growth on natural substrates: Consequences for preserving caves with prehistoric paintings. Curr. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 321–325.
  112. Kiyuna, T.; An, K.D.; Kigawa, R.; Sano, C.; Miura, S.; Sugiyama, J. Bristle-like fungal colonizers on the stone walls of the Kitora and Takamatsuzuka Tumuli are identified as Kendrickiella phycomyces. Mycoscience 2012, 53, 446–459.
  113. Jeffries, P. Growth of Beauveria alba on mural paintings in Canterbury Cathedral. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 1986, 22, 11–13.
  114. Leplat, J.; Francois, A.; Bousta, F. White fungal covering on the wall paintings of the Saint-Savin-sur-Gartempe Abbey church crypt: A case study. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2017, 122, 29–37.
  115. Milanesi, C.; Baldi, F.; Vignani, R.; Ciampolini, F.; Faleri, C.; Cresti, M. Fungal deterioration of medieval wall fresco determined by analysing small fragments containing copper. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2006, 57, 7–13.
  116. Moza, M.I.; Mironescu, M.; Georgescu, C.; Florea, A.; Bucşa, L. Isolation and characterisation of moulds degrading mural paintings. Ann. RSCB 2012, 17, 136–142.
  117. An, K.D.; Kiyuna, T.; Kigawa, R.; Sano, C.; Miura, S.; Sugiyama, J. The identity of Penicillium sp. 1, a major contaminant of the stone chambers in the Takamatsuzuka and Kitora Tumuli in Japan, is Penicillium paneum. Anton. van Leeuw. 2009, 96, 579.
  118. Caneva, G.; Tescari, M.; Bartoli, F.; Nugari, M.P.; Pietrini, A.M.; Salvadori, O. Ecological mapping for the preventive conservation of prehistoric mural paintings in rock habitats: The site of Filiano (Basilicata, Italy). Conserv. Sci. Cult. Herit. 2015, 15, 53–59.
  119. Hibbett, D.S.; Binder, M.; Bischoff, J.F.; Blackwell, M.; Cannon, P.F.; Eriksson, O.E.; Huhndorf, S.; James, T.; Kirk, P.M.; Lu Cking, R.; et al. A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi. Mycol. Res. 2007, 111, 509–547.
  120. Tekpinar, A.D.; Kalmer, A. Utility of various molecular markers in fungal identification and phylogeny. Nova Hedwig. 2019, 109, 187–224.
  121. Al-Hatmi, A.M.S.; Van Den Ende, A.H.G.; Stielow, J.B.; Van Diepeningen, A.D.; Seifert, K.A.; McCormick, W.; Assabgui, R.; Gräfenhan, T.; De Hoog, S.G.; Levesque, C.A. Evaluation of two novel barcodes for species recognition of opportunistic pathogens in Fusarium. Fungal Biol. 2016, 120, 231–245.
  122. Samson, R.A.; Visagie, C.M.; Houbraken, J.; Hong, S.B.; Hubka, V.; Klaassen, C.H.W.; Perrone, G.; Seifert, K.A.; Susca, A.; Tanney, J.B.; et al. Phylogeny, identification and nomenclature of the genus Aspergillus. Stud. Mycol. 2014, 78, 141–173.
  123. Visagie, C.M.; Houbraken, J.; Frisvad, J.C.; Hong, S.B.; Klaassen, C.H.W.; Perrone, G.; Seifert, K.A.; Varga, J.; Yaguchi, T.; Samson, T.A. Identification and nomenclature of the genus Penicillium. Stud. Mycol. 2014, 7, 343–371.
  124. Houbraken, J.; Visagie, C.M.; Frisvad, J.C. Recommendations to prevent taxonomic misidentification of genome-sequenced fungal strains. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2021, 10, e01074-20.
  125. Sandoval-Denis, M.; Gene, J.; Sutton, D.A.; Wiederhold, N.P.; Cano-Lira, J.F.; Guarro, J. New species of Cladosporium associated with human and animal infections. Persoonia 2016, 36, 281–298.
  126. Sterflinger, K.; Little, B.; Pinar, G.; Pinzari, F.; de los Rios, A.; Gu, J.D. Future directions and challenges in biodeterioration research on historic materials and cultural properties. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2018, 129, 10–12.
  127. Isola, D.; Scano, A.; Orrù, G.; Prenafeta-Boldú, F.X.; Zucconi, L. Hydrocarbon-contaminated sites: Is there something more than Exophiala xenobiotica? New insights into black fungal diversity using the long cold incubation method. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 817.
  128. Caneva, G.; Isola, D.; Lee, H.J.; Chung, Y.J. Biological risk for hypogea: Shared data from Etruscan tombs in Italy and ancient tombs of the Baekje dynasty in Republic of Korea. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6104.
  129. Sanchez-Moral, S.; Canaveras, J.C.; Laiz, L.; Saiz-Jimenez, C.; Bedoya, J.; Luque, L. Biomediated precipitation of calcium carbonate metastable phases in hypogean environments: A short review. Geomicrobiol. J. 2003, 20, 491–500.
  130. Caneva, G.; Langone, S.; Bartoli, F.; Cecchini, A.; Meneghini, C. Vegetation cover and tumuli’s shape as affecting factors of microclimate and biodeterioration risk for the conservation of Etruscan tombs (Tarquinia, Italy). Sustainability 2021, 13, 3393.
  131. Savković, Ž.; Stupar, M.; Unković, N.; Knežević, A.; Vukojević, J.; Ljaljević Grbić, M. Fungal Deterioration of Cultural Heritage Objects. In Biodegradation; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021.
  132. Nugari, M.P.; Realini, M.; Roccardi, A. Contamination of mural paintings by indoor airborne fungal spores. Aerobiologia 1993, 9, 131–139.
  133. Mandrioli, P.; Caneva, G.; Sabbioni, C. Cultural Heritage and Aerobiology. Methods and Measurement Techniques for Biodeterioration Monitoring; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003; 260p.
  134. Odum, E.P.; Odum, H.T.; Andrews, J. Fundamentals of Ecology; Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1971; Volume 3.
  135. Caneva, G.; Bartoli, F.; Savo, V.; Futagami, Y.; Strona, G. Combining statistical tools and ecological assessments in the study of biodeterioration patterns of stone temples in Angkor (Cambodia). Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 32601.
Subjects: Microbiology
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to : , , ,
View Times: 383
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 06 Apr 2022