Clinical Applications of Quantitative Imaging

Version	Summary	Created by	Modification	Content Size	Created at	Operation
1		Justin S Chen	--	3203	2022-03-31 22:02:57	\|
2	format	Jason Zhu	-4 word(s)	3199	2022-04-01 03:30:44	\|

Pancreatic cancer remains an unsolved global healthcare problem, has the highest mortality rate of all major cancers, and is expected to take the lives of more than 49,830 people in the US in 2022 alone. While the five-year survival rate has risen considerably for many other cancers over the past century, it has remained rather stagnant for pancreatic cancer despite intense healthcare efforts, staying in the single digits for decades and only recently rising to 10.8%. By the time of diagnosis over half of pancreatic cancers are metastasized, and for these patients the five-year survival rate is only 3%. The dire disease situation reflects inability to diagnose pancreatic cancer early and to effectively treat it. Current failure to diagnose the disease early results in part from the inaccessibility of the organ, difficulties in detecting small pancreatic lesions by conventional imaging approaches, and a poor understanding of the spectrum of heterogeneity in pancreatic cancer. Radiomics and deep learning, two trendy quantitative imaging methods that take advantage of data science and modern medical imaging, have shown increasing promise in advancing the precision management of pancreatic cancer via diagnosing of precursor diseases, early detection, accurate diagnosis, and treatment personalization and optimization. Radiomics employs manually-crafted features, while deep learning applies computer-generated automatic features.

radiomics quantitative imaging pancreatic cancer

1. Pre-Cancerous Pancreatic Lesion Diagnosis

The extreme aggressiveness of pancreatic cancer greatly dampens survival probability when the cancer is diagnosed in late stages, with a five-year survival rate of 3% for metastatic disease ^[1]. Unfortunately, pancreatic cancer is usually not detected until the late stages, with metastatic pancreatic cancer counting for about 52% of patients ^[2]. In contrast, while early-stage resectable pancreatic cancer has a much better five-year survival rate of 39%, only 11% of patients are detected at this stage ^[3]. Early detection of pancreatic cancer is highly valuable in improving pancreatic cancer survival; however, early detection is challenging, as there are no validated screening tests available for pancreatic cancer. Current efforts focus on risk stratification based on intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) and pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) as well as familial risk factors ^[4]. Pancreatic lesions that are unlikely to progress to cancer may not be good candidates for surgical resection, as the operation is highly risky, while precancerous lesions may, as their prognosis is worse. Because of the potential toxicity and mortality associated with invasive biopsy of the pancreas, screening and early detection relies heavily on medical imaging. However, the small size of the early lesions/precursors and complex radiological appearances of these lesions and their background structures substantially challenge conventional radiology in providing reliable image-based early detection and diagnosis of precursor lesions. This offers a window of opportunity for novel quantitative imaging approaches. Both radiomics and deep learning methods have been applied in these types of applications.

A series of papers were identified applying radiomics in pancreatic precancerous lesion diagnosis. As discussed in the introduction, manual segmentation was used in most of these studies. For automatic and semi-automatic segmentation the software or algorithm used to automate the segmentation. Readers are referred to the original publications for additional details on segmentation. Standard-of-care imaging modalities (primarily CT) were used in these studies, though other modalities such as PET were used as well. For example, several radiomic models were developed to diagnose and evaluate the malignancy of cysts, showing improved accuracy compared to conventional radiology ^[5]^[6]^[7]^[8]^[9]^[10]^[11]^[12]^[13]^[14]^[15]^[16]^[17]^[18]. Pancreatic cysts have a fairly common occurrence relative to pancreatic cancer in adults; prevalence increases with age, and can show up as incidental image findings or on screening images. Because these cystic lesions are correlated with a wide range of histologic differentiation and malignant risk, image diagnosis distinguishing among them represents a crucial challenge. The conventional radiological diagnosis of pancreatic cysts is only accurate 60–70% of the time ^[19]. Using quantitative approaches, studies have been able to create a radiomics-based model in order to differentiate cyst types and propose risk stratification useful in determining treatment. High-risk lesions are recommended as candidates for surgical resection, while low-risk lesions are recommended as candidates for less aggressive management. For example, Wei et al. retrospectively studied CT-based radiomics on 260 patients with pancreatic cystic neoplasm and who underwent a pancreatic resection for it ^[8]. Using the pathology-established diagnosis of these 260 lesions, the researchers grouped them into benign serous cystic neoplasms (SCNs) and malignant non-SCNs, the latter consisting of IMPNs, mucinous cystic neoplasms, and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms. With cross-validation in the training cohort of 200 patients, their radiomic model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.84 on the independent validation of 60 patients. In contrast, only 30% (31 of 102) of the SCNs were correctly diagnosed pre-surgery with conventional radiology; thus, radiomics clearly shows potential as a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) tool for improving the efficiency and accuracy of pancreatic cyst diagnosis. In another study using 53 patients with surgically resected IPMNs, Hanania et al. showed that a radiomic model based on texture features could differentiate low-grade versus high-grade IPMNs for the risk stratification necessary in clinical workflows and treatment decisions, with a high AUC of 0.96 in cross-validation compared with a false positive rate of 36% using the clinical Fukuoka criteria ^[5]. Huang et al. were able to use a radiomic model to predict invasive behavior in pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasms ^[20]. Song et al. used a radiomic model to predict the recurrence risk of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms ^[21]. Watson et al. applied a deep learning model to predict the malignancy of pancreatic cystic neoplasms ^[22]. Surgery is the only treatment for these neoplasms, and using radiomic and deep learning models can help to predict the prognosis and therefore led to a more accurate clinical decision regarding surgical resection. The current progress on texture analysis of pancreatic lesions for differential diagnosis has been reported in a recent review by Awe et al. ^[23].

Deep learning models are able to differentiate and risk stratify precancerous pancreatic lesions as well. Similar to radiomics studies, most of these studies were based on CT, though other modalities such as MRI and EUS were studied as well. Several studies adopted CNNs to predict lesion or cyst diagnosis and malignancy, such as lesion type or grade ^[24]^[25]^[26]^[27]^[28]^[29]^[30]. For example, using the EUS images of 206 patients with IPMNs that were later surgically resected, Kuwahara et al. developed a CNN model that achieved 94% accuracy for IPMN malignancy diagnosis, compared with 56% accuracy of human diagnosis ^[30]. In another study, Corral et al. used CNN to classify IPMN based on MRI images, and achieved a comparable AUC of 0.78, compared with 0.76 using the American Gastroenterology Association guidelines and 0.77 using the Fukuoka criteria ^[29]. In addition to these studies that used deep learning models alone, other studies combined deep learning with radiomics by adding radiomic features to the input channels of the deep learning algorithm, and others created fusion models (ensemble models) to integrate radiomics-based and deep learning-based predictions. Dmitriev et al. presented such a study ^[28]; using CT images of 134 patients with pancreatic cysts consisting of four histopathological types, they trained a radiomics model, a CNN model, and an ensemble/fusion model to classify the cyst lesion types ^[28]. On cross-validation, the radiomics model and the CNN model achieved an overall accuracy of 79.8% and 77.6%, respectively, while the ensemble/fusion model reached 83.6% ^[28]. Fusion models outperform radiomic models and deep learning models in these early lesion classification and malignancy diagnosis applications.

2. Pancreatic Cancer Detection and Diagnosis

Because reliable pancreatic cancer detection and diagnosis is unattainable based simply on symptoms and signs, medical imaging plays an essential role. A variety of imaging modalities can be used, including transabdominal US, CT, ERCP, MRCP, etc. CT is the most commonly used imaging modality among these, with a reported sensitivity of detection ranging from mid~70% to high~90% ^[31]. However, the accuracy of detection and diagnosis is highly dependent on the radiologist’s experience; misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis are not uncommon. Therefore, radiomics and deep learning have been explored to aid the clinical task of image-based pancreatic cancer detection and diagnosis.

For detection, several works have shown the utility of radiomic models in differentiating pancreatic cancer tissue and healthy tissue ^[32]^[33]. Chu et al. trained a whole-pancreas ROI-based radiomic model on 225 training cases and validated the model on 125 validation cases ^[33]; the resulting model consisted of 40 radiomic features and achieved a very high AUC of 99.9% ^[33]. Chen et al. applied radiomic features and machine learning to investigate the utility of radiomics modeling in detecting pancreatic cancer ^[32]. Based on contrast-enhanced CT, they observed that pancreatic cancer tends to be hypodense and more heterogeneous compared with normal pancreas, as reflected by the relevant radiomic feature values. Quantitatively, their radiomics model trained on >1000 subjects achieved AUCs of 0.98 and 0.91 on local and external test datasets.

Deep learning models have proven useful for detecting pancreatic cancer. Zhang et al. used a novel deep learning framework consisting of Augmented Feature Pyramid networks, Self-adaptive Feature Fusion, and a Dependencies Computation Module to detect pancreatic cancer tumors, which resulted in an AUC of 0.95 on internal testing ^[34]. In a large-cohort study, Liu et al. applied CNN-based modeling on contrast-enhanced CTs of ~700 subjects (~1:1 with pancreatic cancer vs. healthy pancreas controls, divided 4:1 into training and validation sets) ^[35]. The model was further tested on a ~200-subject independent local cohort and a ~350-subject independent international cohort, achieving an AUC of 1.00 and 0.92, respectively ^[35]. For their local validation and testing datasets, the performance of the CNN model was compared against that of human radiologists and showed significantly higher sensitivity ^[35]. In another study, Chu et al. reported their initial experience of training deep learning networks to detect pancreatic adenocarcinoma ^[36]. They took a two-step approach to their curated large CT cohort of pancreatic cancer patients and controls with a healthy pancreas, using supervised learning to first train deep learning models to automatically segment all abdominal organs, and then to detect pancreatic cancer. Their algorithms achieved segmentation performances superior to published state-of-the-art algorithms, and showed 94.1% sensitivity and 98.5% specificity for pancreatic cancer detection in preliminary testing.

As pancreatic cancer is highly aggressive, correctly diagnosing it from benign or less-aggressive lesions could reduce unnecessary surgical resections that potentially lead to patient morbidity. Image-based grading and histopathology prediction can aid better treatment stratification. Reinert et al. identified CT-based textual features that can differentiate between pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors as well as between low-grade and high-grade pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors ^[37]. Gu et al. were able to differentiate pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors from solid pseudopapillary neoplasm using MRI radiomic features ^[38]. Zhao et al. and Benedetti et al. used CT-based radiomic features to discriminate pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor grades, and Bendetti et al. predicted lymph node invasion status ^[39]^[40]. Similarly, using texture features on CT, Canellas et al. were able to differentiate grade 1 from grade 2 and 3 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors ^[41]. In a large-cohort study, Chang et al. used contrast-enhanced CTs of ~300 patients to train and validate radiomics models to differentiate high-grade versus low-grade pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, achieving an AUC of 0.91 on the internal validation set and 0.77 on a 100-patient external testing cohort ^[42]. Other imaging modalities have been explored as well; in an early study, Zhu et al. used a support vector machine model on texture features from EUS images to differentiate pancreatic cancer from chronic pancreatitis ^[43]. With a total of ~400 patients, >90% accuracy was achieved in cross-validation. Based on various MRI sequences, Deng et al. tested radiomics models and compared them against a clinical model to differentiate pancreatic cancer from mass-forming chronic pancreatitis ^[44]. The radiomic models developed on a training cohort achieved performances much superior to the clinical model on a validation cohort from a different institution (AUCs of 0.88–0.96 vs. 0.65). Bevilacqua et al. used [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT radiomic features to detect grade 1 and 2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors ^[45].

Deep learning models have been successfully applied in pancreatic cancer diagnosis. CNN-based models have been frequently used. Si et al. applied ResNet models to diagnose different pancreatic lesions and achieved an average accuracy of 82.7% for all tumor types ^[46], and generated saliency maps to highlight the image regions relevant to the decision. Saftoiu et al. used an extended neural network analysis on EUS elastography for differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis, and achieved an average testing performance of 95% on cross-validation ^[47]. Ziegelmayer et al. applied CNN modeling on CT images to discriminate between pancreatic cancer and autoimmune pancreatitis, and compared it with radiomics modeling ^[48]. On cross-validation, they achieved an average AUC of 0.90 with the deep learning model, outperforming their radiomic model, which had an AUC of 0.80.

Correctly detecting and diagnosing pancreatic cancer is crucial for managing the disease and selecting optimal treatment, and is ultimately crucial for patient outcomes. Accurate diagnosis of non-cancer versus cancer could reduce unnecessary surgical resections, which can lead to patient morbidity. Overall, both radiomic and deep learning models show great promise in these clinical tasks and could be implemented into computer-aided diagnosis systems for pancreatic cancer. These models could reduce the time and manual effort involved in these clinical tasks, reduce invasive biopsy procedures, and potentially offer more accurate diagnoses in order to improve treatment planning and improve patient outcomes.

3. Pancreatic Cancer Prognosis

Significant radiomic and deep learning features in pretreatment images have been used to predict treatment efficacy for pancreatic cancer. Survival can be predicted by both radiomic and deep learning models using pretreatment images in order to determine the level of treatment needed for the best chance of patient survival. Similarly, predictions on recurrence, metastasis, and surgical margins can be used to strategize regarding the optimal treatment for an individual patient.

Radiomic models have been used to predict progression-free survival, relapse-free survival, and overall survival for pancreatic cancer ^[49]^[50]^[51]^[52]^[53]^[54]^[55]^[56]^[57]^[58]^[59]^[60]^[61]^[62]^[63], and deep learning models have been used to model survival as well ^[64]^[65]^[66]^[67]^[68]. Mapelli et al. used a radiomic model to predict the aggressiveness of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms ^[69]. Gao et al. used a deep learning CNN model to predict grades of PNET, with an average accuracy of 85.1% ± 0.4% and an average accuracy on the external validation set ranging between 79.1 and 82.4% ^[68]. Klimov et al. were able to predict metastasis risk in PNETs using a deep learning approach that had high ability to differentiate tumors, with an accuracy of >95% ^[70]. The models of both Gao et al. and Klimov et al. show promise in accurately assigning treatment plans to PNET patients while correctly predicting prognosis. Tang et al. were able to predict early recurrence in resectable pancreatic cancer using a radiomic nomogram ^[71]. Patients with a high risk of recurrence may be treated more aggressively or with other treatment modalities using the risk stratification proposed by the model developed by Tang et al. Bian et al. predicted the risk of lymph node metastasis in pancreatic cancer patients using a radiomic model ^[72]. Liu et al. were able to predict lymph node metastasis with their radiomic model as well ^[73]. If a pancreatic cancer patient already has lymph node metastases, a radical pancreatic operation may be futile and not worth the risks. The models developed by Bian et al. and Liu et al. could help to relieve patients from unnecessary operations.

In a different study, Bian et al. created a radiomic model to predict superior mesenteric vein resection margin (R1/2 vs. R0) in patients with pancreatic head cancer; their model was able to predict patient prognosis, as R1/2 resection is associated with poor overall survival relative to R0 resection ^[74]. Hui et al. were able to predict resection margin for pancreatic head cancer using a radiomic model as well ^[75]. Zhang et al. created a radiomics model that could predict postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy; their model could help with decisionmaking regarding risks of a pancreaticoduodenectomy ^[76]. Postoperative pancreatic fistula is one of the more harmful consequences of a pancreatic resection or pancreaticoduodenectomy, and the use of any of the aforementioned models could help to predict patient prognosis and assist with clinical decision making.

Li et al. created a radiomic model that could predict CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte expression levels in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma ^[76]. Patients with high levels of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte expression are possibly able to undergo immunotherapy targeting immune checkpoint inhibitors to improve their prognosis ^[77]. Bian et al. were able to predict tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte expression in their radiomic and deep learning models as well ^[78].

4. Treatment Stratification, Delta-Radiomics, and Radiogenomics

Apart from diagnosis and differentiation of pancreatic diseases, radiomics can play a helpful role in predicting optimal therapy paths. Several studies in radiomics have predicted treatment response to pancreatic cancer ^[50]^[79]^[80]^[81]^[82]^[83]^[84]^[85]^[86]. Parr et al. applied radiomic models to pretreatment CT images in order to predict overall survival and locoregional recurrence of pancreatic cancer after stereotactic body radiation therapy ^[50]. Their radiomic model and the model combining radiomic and clinical features outperformed the pure clinical model in these predictions, with an average concordance index of 0.66 and 0.68 versus 0.54 for survival and an average AUC of 0.78 and 0.77 vs. 0.66 for recurrence on validations ^[50]. Cozzi et al., using a hybrid clinical–radiomics model, were able to differentiate high and low risk in terms of overall survival for patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy, with an AUC of 0.81 ^[80]. Those patients with a low overall survival prediction may need more aggressive treatment, and with this model high-risk and low-risk groups can be more accurately identified. Watson et al. applied deep learning CNN to predict pathologic tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer, with an AUC of 0.738 in predicting response to chemotherapy and an accuracy of 78.3% in predicting response to resectability ^[87].

Another direction of radiomics, as in studies on other cancers, is delta-radiomics. Delta-radiomics assesses the temporal change or kinetics of radiomic signatures and explores its value in evaluating tumor progression or predicting long-term patient outcomes. The examined temporal window using delta-radiomics can be relatively short, such as when using daily imaging during a radiation therapy treatment course, or more extended, as when using periodical imaging from diagnosis to treatment and follow-up. Delta-radiomics has been explored for pancreatic cancer thanks to its value in prognosis prediction and treatment stratification. Using daily imaging during a radiation therapy treatment course, Chen et al. showed that patients with good pathological pancreatic tumor response tended to have large changes in certain radiomic features of the tumor compared to those with poor tumor response; radiation-induced delta-radiomics may potentially be used for early assessment of treatment response during radiation delivery ^[88].

Aside from the above clinical applications, radiomics has been used in radiogenomics. Radiogenomics is an offshoot branch of radiomics that applies radiomic workflow and imaging features coupled with genomic profiles ^[89] to assess the association between imaging phenotypes and the underlying tumor biology. These radiomic signatures associated with underlying patterns of gene expression can then be used to predict prognosis and optimal treatment. While radiogenomics has been more widely studied for other types of cancer, pancreatic cancer radiogenomic studies remain sparse. On the other hand, the genomic landscape of pancreatic cancer is diverse and many mutations have been detected, creating many potential opportunities for radiogenomic analysis ^[90]. A few radiogenomic studies have been conducted ^[91]^[92]^[90]^[93]^[94]. Katabathina et al. suggest that the varied biological tumor features related to the different mutations in panNENs may result in morphological changes that are appreciable with imaging ^[95]. McGovern et al. identified CT-based radiomic features that are significantly associated with the alternative lengthening of the telomere phenotype of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors ^[90]. Attiyeh et al. demonstrated that radiomic signatures of preoperative CT can predict the mutation status of certain pancreatic cancer driver genes, such as SMAD4 ^[90]. The use of radiogenomics can increase personalized medicine within pancreatic cancer patients, leading to better outcomes.

This entry is adapted from 10.3390/cancers14071654

References

Chiaro, M.D. Early Detection and Prevention of Pancreatic Cancer: Is It Really Possible Today? World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 12118.
Tas, F.; Sen, F.; Keskin, S.; Kilic, L.; Yildiz, I. Prognostic Factors in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Older Patients Are Associated with Reduced Overall Survival. Mol. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 1, 788–792.
Pancreatic Cancer—Statistics. Available online: https://www.cancer.net/cancer-types/pancreatic-cancer/statistics (accessed on 21 January 2022).
Goggins, M.; Overbeek, K.A.; Brand, R.; Syngal, S.; Del Chiaro, M.; Bartsch, D.K.; Bassi, C.; Carrato, A.; Farrell, J.; Fishman, E.K.; et al. Management of Patients with In-creased Risk for Familial Pancreatic Cancer: Updated Recommendations from the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium. Gut 2019, 69, 7–17.
Hanania, A.N.; Bantis, L.E.; Feng, Z.; Wang, H.; Tamm, E.P.; Katz, M.H.; Maitra, A.; Koay, E.J. Quantitative imaging to evaluate malignant potential of IPMNs. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 85776–85784.
Tobaly, D.; Santinha, J.; Sartoris, R.; Dioguardi Burgio, M.; Matos, C.; Cros, J.; Couvelard, A.; Rebours, V.; Sauvanet, A.; Ro-not, M.; et al. CT-Based Radiomics Analysis to Predict Malignancy in Patients with Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm (IPMN) of the Pancreas. Cancers 2020, 12, 3089.
Permuth, J.B.; Choi, J.; Balarunathan, Y.; Kim, J.; Chen, D.-T.; Chen, L.; Orcutt, S.; Doepker, M.P.; Gage, K.; Zhang, G.; et al. Combining radiomic features with a miRNA classifier may improve prediction of malignant pathology for pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 85785–85797.
Wei, R.; Lin, K.; Yan, W.; Guo, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Zhu, J. Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Pancreas Serous Cystic Neoplasms: A Radiomics Method on Preoperative MDCT Images. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2019, 18, 1–9.
Xie, H.; Ma, S.; Guo, X.; Zhang, X.; Wang, X. Preoperative differentiation of pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasm from macrocystic serous cystic adenoma using radiomics: Preliminary findings and comparison with radiological model. Eur. J. Radiol. 2020, 122, 108747.
Chakraborty, J.; Midya, A.; Gazit, L.; Attiyeh, M.; Langdon-Embry, L.; Allen, P.J.; Do, R.K.; Simpson, A.L. CT Radiomics to Predict High-Risk Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas. Med Phys. 2018, 45, 5019–5029.
Harrington, K.A.; Williams, T.L.; Lawrence, S.A.; Chakraborty, J.; Al Efishat, M.A.; Attiyeh, M.A.; Askan, G.; Chou, Y.; Pulvirenti, A.; McIntyre, C.A.; et al. Multimodal radiomics and cyst fluid inflammatory markers model to predict preoperative risk in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. J. Med. Imaging 2020, 7, 031507.
Shen, X.; Yang, F.; Yang, P.; Yang, M.; Xu, L.; Zhuo, J.; Wang, J.; Lu, D.; Liu, Z.; Zheng, S.-S.; et al. A Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Based Radiomics Approach for Preoperative Differentiation of Pancreatic Cystic Neo-Plasm Subtypes: A Feasibility Study. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 248.
Chen, S.; Ren, S.; Guo, K.; Daniels, M.J.; Wang, Z.; Chen, R. Preoperative differentiation of serous cystic neoplasms from mucin-producing pancreatic cystic neoplasms using a CT-based radiomics nomogram. Abdom. Radiol. 2021, 46, 2637–2646.
Cui, S.; Tang, T.; Su, Q.; Wang, Y.; Shu, Z.; Yang, W.; Gong, X. Radiomic nomogram based on MRI to predict grade of branching type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: A multicenter study. Cancer Imaging 2021, 21, 1–13.
Xie, T.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, Z. CT-Based Radiomics Analysis for Preoperative Diagnosis of Pancreatic Mucinous Cyst-ic Neoplasm and Atypical Serous Cystadenomas. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 621520.
Polk, S.L.; Choi, J.W.; Mcgettigan, M.J.; Rose, T.; Ahmed, A.; Kim, J.; Jiang, K.; Balagurunathan, Y.; Qi, J.; Farah, P.T.; et al. Multiphase computed tomography radiomics of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms to predict malignancy. World J. Gastroenterol. 2020, 26, 3458–3471.
Cheng, S.; Shi, H.; Lu, M.; Wang, C.; Duan, S.; Xu, Q.; Shi, H. Radiomics Analysis for Predicting Malignant Potential of In-traductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas: Comparison of CT and MRI. Acad. Radiol. 2021, 29, 367–375.
D’Onofrio, M.; Tedesco, G.; Cardobi, N.; De Robertis, R.; Sarno, A.; Capelli, P.; Martini, P.T.; Giannotti, G.; Beleù, A.; Marchegiani, G.; et al. Magnetic resonance (MR) for mural nodule detection studying Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) of pancreas: Imaging-pathologic correlation. Pancreatology 2020, 21, 180–187.
Sahani, D.V.; Sainani, N.I.; Blake, M.A.; Crippa, S.; Mino-Kenudson, M.; del-Castillo, C.F. Prospective Evaluation of Read-er Performance on MDCT in Characterization of Cystic Pancreatic Lesions and Prediction of Cyst Biologic Aggressiveness. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2011, 197, W53–W61.
Huang, W.-P.; Liu, S.-Y.; Han, Y.-J.; Li, L.-M.; Liang, P.; Gao, J.-B. Development of CT-Based Imaging Signature for Preoperative Prediction of Invasive Behavior in Pancreatic Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11.
Song, C.; Wang, M.; Luo, Y.; Chen, J.; Peng, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, Z.-P.; Shen, J.; Huang, B.; et al. Predicting the Recurrence Risk of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms after Radical Resection Using Deep Learning Radiomics with Pre-operative Computed Tomography Images. Ann. Transl. Med. 2021, 9, 833.
Watson, M.D.; Lyman, W.B.; Passeri, M.J.; Murphy, K.J.; Sarantou, J.P.; Iannitti, D.A.; Martinie, J.B.; Vrochides, D.; Baker, E.H. Use of Artificial Intelligence Deep Learning to Determine the Malignant Potential of Pancreatic Cystic Neo-Plasms with Preoperative Computed Tomography Imaging. Am. Surg. 2020, 87, 602–607.
Awe, A.M.; Rendell, V.R.; Lubner, M.G.; Winslow, E.R. Texture Analysis. Pancreas 2020, 49, 301–312.
Yang, J.; Guo, X.; Ou, X.; Zhang, W.; Ma, X. Discrimination of Pancreatic Serous Cystadenomas from Mucinous Cystadeno-mas With CT Textural Features: Based on Machine Learning. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 494.
Kurita, Y.; Kuwahara, T.; Hara, K.; Mizuno, N.; Okuno, N.; Matsumoto, S.; Obata, M.; Koda, H.; Tajika, M.; Shimizu, Y.; et al. Diagnostic ability of artificial intelligence using deep learning analysis of cyst fluid in differentiating malignant from benign pancreatic cystic lesions. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 6893.
Ma, H.; Liu, Z.-X.; Zhang, J.-J.; Wu, F.-T.; Xu, C.-F.; Shen, Z.; Yu, C.-H.; Li, Y.-M. Construction of a convolutional neural network classifier developed by computed tomography images for pancreatic cancer diagnosis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2020, 26, 5156–5168.
Luo, Y.; Chen, X.; Chen, J.; Song, C.; Shen, J.; Xiao, H.; Chen, M.; Li, Z.-P.; Huang, B.; Feng, S.-T. Preoperative Prediction of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Grading Based on Enhanced Computed Tomography Imaging: Validation of Deep Learning with a Convolutional Neural Network. Neuroendocrinology 2019, 110, 338–350.
Dmitriev, K.; Kaufman, A.E.; Javed, A.A.; Hruban, R.H.; Fishman, E.K.; Lennon, A.M.; Saltz, J.H. Classification of Pancreatic Cysts in Computed Tomography Images Using a Random Forest and Convolutional Neural Network Ensemble. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 150–158.
Corral, J.E.; Hussein, S.; Kandel, P.; Bolan, C.W.; Bagci, U.; Wallace, M.B. Deep Learning to Classify Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Pancreas 2019, 48, 805–810.
Kuwahara, T.; Hara, K.; Mizuno, N.; Okuno, N.; Matsumoto, S.; Obata, M.; Kurita, Y.; Koda, H.; Toriyama, K.; Onishi, S.; et al. Usefulness of Deep Learning Analysis for the Diagnosis of Malignancy in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol. 2019, 10, e00045.
Chu, L.; Goggins, M.G.; Fishman, E. Diagnosis and Detection of Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer J. 2017, 23, 333–342.
Chen, P.-T.; Chang, D.; Yen, H.; Liu, K.-L.; Huang, S.-Y.; Roth, H.; Wu, M.-S.; Liao, W.-C.; Wang, W. Radiomic Features at CT Can Distinguish Pancreatic Cancer from Noncancerous Pancreas. Radiol. Imaging Cancer 2021, 3, e210010.
Chu, L.C.; Park, S.; Kawamoto, S.; Fouladi, D.F.; Shayesteh, S.; Zinreich, E.S.; Graves, J.S.; Horton, K.M.; Hruban, R.H.; Yuille, A.L.; et al. Utility of CT Radiomics Features in Differentiation of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma from Normal Pancreatic Tissue. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2019, 213, 349–357.
Zhang, Z.; Li, S.; Wang, Z.; Lu, Y. A Novel and Efficient Tumor Detection Framework for Pancreatic Cancer via CT Images. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2020, 1160–1164.
Liu, K.-L.; Wu, T.; Chen, P.-T.; Tsai, Y.M.; Roth, H.; Wu, M.-S.; Liao, W.-C.; Wang, W. Deep Learning to Distinguish Pancreatic Cancer Tissue from Non-Cancerous Pancreatic Tissue: A Retrospective Study with Cross-Racial External Validation. Lancet Digit. Health 2020, 2, e303–e313.
Chu, L.C.; Park, S.; Kawamoto, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Shen, W.; Zhu, Z.; Xia, Y.; Xie, L.; Liu, F.; et al. Application of Deep Learning to Pancreatic Cancer Detection: Lessons Learned from Our Initial Experience. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2019, 16, 1338–1342.
Reinert, C.P.; Baumgartner, K.; Hepp, T.; Bitzer, M.; Horger, M. Complementary role of computed tomography texture analysis for differentiation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in the portal-venous enhancement phase. Abdom. Radiol. 2020, 45, 750–758.
Gu, H.; Liang, H.; Zhong, J.; Wei, Y.; Ma, Y. How Does the Pancreatic Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm Confuse Us: Analyzing from the Point View of MRI-Based Radiomics? Magn. Reson. Imaging 2022, 85, 38–43.
Benedetti, G.; Mori, M.; Panzeri, M.M.; Barbera, M.; Palumbo, D.; Sini, C.; Muffatti, F.; Andreasi, V.; Steidler, S.; Doglioni, C.; et al. CT-derived radiomic features to discriminate histologic characteristics of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 745–760.
Zhao, Z.; Bian, Y.; Jiang, H.; Fang, X.; Li, J.; Cao, K.; Ma, C.; Wang, L.; Zheng, J.; Yue, X.; et al. CT-Radiomic Approach to Predict G1/2 Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor. Acad. Radiol. 2020, 27, e272–e281.
Canellas, R.; Burk, K.S.; Parakh, A.; Sahani, D.V. Prediction of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Grade Based on CT Features and Texture Analysis. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2018, 210, 341–346.
Chang, N.; Cui, L.; Luo, Y.; Chang, Z.; Yu, B.; Liu, Z. Development and Multicenter Validation of a CT-Based Radiomics Sig-nature for Discriminating Histological Grades of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 2020, 10, 692–702.
Zhu, M.; Xu, C.; Yu, J.; Wu, Y.; Li, C.; Zhang, M.; Jin, Z.; Li, Z. Differentiation of Pancreatic Cancer and Chronic Pancreatitis Using Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) Images: A Diagnostic Test. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e63820.
Deng, Y.; Ming, B.; Zhou, T.; Wu, J.; Chen, Y.; Liu, P.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, S.; Chen, T.; Zhang, X.-M. Radiomics Model Based on MR Images to Discriminate Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Mass-Forming Chronic Pancreatitis Lesions. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 811.
Bevilacqua, A.; Calabrò, D.; Malavasi, S.; Ricci, C.; Casadei, R.; Campana, D.; Baiocco, S.; Fanti, S.; Ambrosini, V. A Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT Radiomic Model for Non-Invasive Prediction of Tumour Grade in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 870.
Si, K.; Xue, Y.; Yu, X.; Zhu, X.; Li, Q.; Gong, W.; Liang, T.; Duan, S. Fully End-to-End Deep-Learning-Based Diagnosis of Pancreatic Tumors. Theranostics 2021, 11, 1982–1990.
Săftoiu, A.; Vilmann, P.; Gorunescu, F.; Gheonea, D.I.; Gorunescu, M.; Ciurea, T.; Popescu, G.L.; Iordache, A.; Hassan, H.; Iordache, S. Neural network analysis of dynamic sequences of EUS elastography used for the differential diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2008, 68, 1086–1094.
Ziegelmayer, S.; Kaissis, G.; Harder, F.; Jungmann, F.; Müller, T.; Makowski, M.; Braren, R. Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Assisted Feature Extraction for Diagnostic Discrimination and Feature Visualization in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) versus Autoimmune Pancreatitis (AIP). J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 4013.
Cheng, S.-H.; Cheng, Y.-J.; Jin, Z.-Y.; Xue, H.-D. Unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Role of CT quantitative imaging biomarkers for predicting outcomes of patients treated with chemotherapy. Eur. J. Radiol. 2019, 113, 188–197.
Parr, E.; Du, Q.; Zhang, C.; Lin, C.; Kamal, A.; McAlister, J.; Liang, X.; Bavitz, K.; Rux, G.; Hollingsworth, M.; et al. Radiomics-Based Outcome Prediction for Pancreatic Cancer Following Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Cancers 2020, 12, 1051.
Li, K.; Yao, Q.; Xiao, J.; Li, M.; Yang, J.; Hou, W.; Du, M.; Chen, K.; Qu, Y.; Li, L.; et al. Contrast-Enhanced CT Radiomics for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Pilot Study. Cancer Imaging 2020, 20, 1–10.
Cusumano, D.; Boldrini, L.; Yadav, P.; Casà, C.; Lee, S.; Romano, A.; Piras, A.; Chiloiro, G.; Placidi, L.; Catucci, F.; et al. Delta Radiomics Analysis for Local Control Prediction in Pancreatic Cancer Patients Treated Using Magnetic Resonance Guided Radiotherapy. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 72.
Cen, C.; Liu, L.; Li, X.; Wu, A.; Liu, H.; Wang, X.; Wu, H.; Wang, C.; Han, P.; Wang, S. Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma at CT: A Combined Nomogram Model to Preoperatively Predict Cancer Stage and Survival Outcome. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 1980.
Kim, H.S.; Kim, Y.J.; Kim, K.G.; Park, J.S. Preoperative CT texture features predict prognosis after curative resection in pancreatic cancer. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 17389.
Khalvati, F.; Zhang, Y.; Baig, S.; Lobo-Mueller, E.M.; Karanicolas, P.; Gallinger, S.; Haider, M.A. Prognostic Value of CT Radiomic Features in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5449.
Toyama, Y.; Hotta, M.; Motoi, F.; Takanami, K.; Minamimoto, R.; Takase, K. Prognostic value of FDG-PET radiomics with machine learning in pancreatic cancer. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 17024.
Xie, T.; Wang, X.; Li, M.; Tong, T.; Yu, X.; Zhou, Z. Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Radiomics Nomogram Outperforms Clinical Model and TNM Staging for Survival Estimation after Curative Resection. Eur. Radiol. 2020, 30, 2513–2524.
Hang, J.; Xu, K.; Yin, R.; Shao, Y.; Liu, M.; Shi, H.; Wang, X.; Wu, L. Role of CT texture features for predicting outcome of pancreatic cancer patients with liver metastases. J. Cancer 2021, 12, 2351–2358.
Mori, M.; Passoni, P.; Incerti, E.; Bettinardi, V.; Broggi, S.; Reni, M.; Whybra, P.; Spezi, E.; Vanoli, E.G.; Gianolli, L.; et al. Training and validation of a robust PET radiomic-based index to predict distant-relapse-free-survival after radio-chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Radiother. Oncol. 2020, 153, 258–264.
Salinas-Miranda, E.; Khalvati, F.; Namdar, K.; Deniffel, D.; Dong, X.; Abbas, E.; Wilson, J.M.; O’Kane, G.M.; Knox, J.; Gallinger, S.; et al. Validation of Prognostic Radiomic Features from Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma in Patients with Advanced Disease Undergoing Chemotherapy. Can. Assoc. Radiol. J. 2020, 72, 605–613.
Li, K.; Xiao, J.; Yang, J.; Li, M.; Xiong, X.; Nian, Y.; Qiao, L.; Wang, H.; Eresen, A.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Association of radiomic imaging features and gene expression profile as prognostic factors in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2019, 11, 4491–4499.
D’Onofrio, M.; De Robertis, R.; Aluffi, G.; Cadore, C.; Beleù, A.; Cardobi, N.; Malleo, G.; Manfrin, E.; Bassi, C. CT Simplified Radiomic Approach to Assess the Metastatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas. Cancers 2021, 13, 1843.
Mapelli, P.; Partelli, S.; Salgarello, M.; Doraku, J.; Muffatti, F.; Schiavo Lena, M.; Pasetto, S.; Bezzi, C.; Bettinardi, V.; Andreasi, V.; et al. Dual Tracer 68ga-DOTATOC and 18F-FDG Pet Improve Pre-operative Evaluation of Aggressiveness in Resectable Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 192.
Kaissis, G.; Ziegelmayer, S.; Lohöfer, F.; Algül, H.; Eiber, M.; Weichert, W.; Schmid, R.; Friess, H.; Rummeny, E.; Ankerst, D.; et al. A Machine Learning Model for the Prediction of Survival and Tumor Subtype in Pancreatic Ductal Ad-enocarcinoma from Preoperative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging. Eur. Radiol. Exp. 2019, 3, 1–9.
Yao, J.; Shi, Y.; Lu, L.; Xiao, J.; Zhang, L. DeepPrognosis: Preoperative Prediction of Pancreatic Cancer Survival and Surgical Margin via Contrast-Enhanced CT Imaging. In Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2020: 23rd International Conference, Lima, Peru, 4–8 October 2020.
Zhang, Y.; Lobo-Mueller, E.M.; Karanicolas, P.; Gallinger, S.; Haider, M.A.; Khalvati, F. Prognostic Value of Transfer Learn-ing Based Features in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Front. Artif. Intell. 2020, 3, 77.
Zhang, Y.; Lobo-Mueller, E.M.; Karanicolas, P.; Gallinger, S.; Haider, M.A.; Khalvati, F. Improving prognostic performance in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using radiomics and deep learning features fusion in CT images. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1378.
Gao, X.; Wang, X. Deep learning for World Health Organization grades of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images: A preliminary study. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 2019, 14, 1981–1991.
Mapelli, P.; Partelli, S.; Salgarello, M.; Doraku, J.; Pasetto, S.; Rancoita, P.M.V.; Muffatti, F.; Bettinardi, V.; Presotto, L.; Andreasi, V.; et al. Dual Tracer 68Ga-DOTATOC and 18F-FDG PET/Computed Tomography Ra-diomics in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: An Endearing Tool for Preoperative Risk Assessment. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2020, 41, 896–905.
Klimov, S.; Xue, Y.; Gertych, A.; Graham, R.P.; Jiang, Y.; Bhattarai, S.; Pandol, S.J.; Rakha, E.A.; Reid, M.D.; Aneja, R. Pre-dicting Metastasis Risk in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Using Deep Learning Image Analysis. Front. Oncol. 2021, 10, 3336.
Tang, T.; Liang, T.-B.; Zhang, Q.; Guo, C.; Zhang, X.; Lao, M.; Shen, Y.; Xiao, W.; Ying, S.; Sun, K.; et al. Development of a Novel Multiparametric MRI Radiomic Nomogram for Preoperative Evaluation of Early Recurrence in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019, 52, 231–245.
Bian, Y.; Guo, S.; Jiang, H.; Gao, S.; Shao, C.; Cao, K.; Fang, X.; Li, J.; Wang, L.; Hua, W.; et al. Relationship Between Radiomics and Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Pancreas 2019, 48, 1195–1203.
Liu, P.; Gu, Q.; Hu, X.; Tan, X.; Liu, J.; Xie, A.; Huang, F. Applying a radiomics-based strategy to preoperatively predict lymph node metastasis in the resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J. X-ray Sci. Technol. 2020, 28, 1113–1121.
Bian, Y.; Jiang, H.; Ma, C.; Cao, K.; Fang, X.; Li, J.; Wang, L.; Zheng, J.; Lu, J. Performance of CT-Based Radiomics in Diagnosis of Superior Mesenteric Vein Resection Margin in Patients with Pancreatic Head Cancer. Abdom. Radiol. 2020, 45, 759–773.
Hui, B.; Qiu, J.-J.; Liu, J.-H.; Ke, N.-W. Identification of Pancreaticoduodenectomy Resection for Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma: A Preliminary Study of Radiomics. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2020, 2020, 1–12.
Zhang, W.; Cai, W.; He, B.; Xiang, N.; Fang, C.; Jia, F. A Radiomics-Based Formula for the Preoperative Prediction of Postop-erative Pancreatic Fistula in Patients with Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Cancer Manag. Res. 2018, 10, 6469–6478.
Li, J.; Shi, Z.; Liu, F.; Fang, X.; Cao, K.; Meng, Y.; Zhang, H.; Yu, J.; Feng, X.; Li, Q.; et al. XGBoost Classifier Based on Computed Tomography Radiomics for Prediction of Tumor-Infiltrating CD8+ T-Cells in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 1714.
Bian, Y.; Liu, Y.F.; Jiang, H.; Meng, Y.; Liu, F.; Cao, K.; Zhang, H.; Fang, X.; Li, J.; Yu, J.; et al. Machine Learning for MRI Radiomics: A Study Predicting Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Abdom. Radiol. 2021, 46, 4800–4816.
Eilaghi, A.; Baig, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Karanicolas, P.; Gallinger, S.; Khalvati, F.; Haider, M.A. CT texture features are associated with overall survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma—A quantitative analysis. BMC Med Imaging 2017, 17, 38.
Cozzi, L.; Comito, T.; Fogliata, A.; Franzese, C.; Franceschini, D.; Bonifacio, C.; Tozzi, A.; Di Brina, L.; Clerici, E.; Tomatis, S.; et al. Computed Tomography Based Radiomic Signature as Predictive of Survival and Local Control after Stereotactic Body Radiation Thera-py in Pancreatic Carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0210758.
Steinacker, J.P.; Steinacker-Stanescu, N.; Ettrich, T.; Kornmann, M.; Kneer, K.; Beer, A.; Beer, M.; Schmidt, S.A. Computed Tomography-Based Tumor Heterogeneity Analysis Reveals Differences in a Cohort with Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma under Palliative Chemotherapy. Visc. Med. 2020, 37, 77–83.
Nasief, H.; Zheng, C.; Schott, D.; Hall, W.; Tsai, S.; Erickson, B.; Allen Li, X. A Machine Learning Based Delta-Radiomics Pro-cess for Early Prediction of Treatment Response of Pancreatic Cancer. Precis. Oncol. 2019, 3, 1–10.
Nasief, H.; Hall, W.; Zheng, C.; Tsai, S.; Wang, L.; Erickson, B.; Li, X.A. Improving Treatment Response Prediction for Chemoradiation Therapy of Pancreatic Cancer Using a Combination of Delta-Radiomics and the Clinical Biomarker CA19-9. Front. Oncol. 2020, 9, 1464.
Zhou, H.-F.; Han, Y.-Q.; Lu, J.; Wei, J.-W.; Guo, J.-H.; Zhu, H.-D.; Huang, M.; Ji, J.-S.; Lv, W.-F.; Chen, L.; et al. Radiomics Facilitates Candidate Selection for Irradiation Stents Among Patients with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 973.
Liang, L.; Ding, Y.; Yu, Y.; Liu, K.; Rao, S.; Ge, Y.; Zeng, M. Whole-tumour evaluation with MRI and radiomics features to predict the efficacy of S-1 for adjuvant chemotherapy in postoperative pancreatic cancer patients: A pilot study. BMC Med. Imaging 2021, 21, 75.
Borhani, A.A.; Dewan, R.; Furlan, A.; Seiser, N.; Zureikat, A.H.; Singhi, A.D.; Boone, B.; Bahary, N.; Hogg, M.E.; Lotze, M.; et al. Assessment of Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy Using CT Texture Analysis in Patients with Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2020, 214, 362–369.
Watson, M.D.; Baimas-George, M.R.; Murphy, K.J.; Pickens, R.C.; Iannitti, D.A.; Martinie, J.B.; Baker, E.H.; Vrochides, D.; Ocuin, L.M. Pure and Hybrid Deep Learning Models Can Predict Pathologic Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Pilot Study. Am. Surg. 2020, 87, 1901–1909.
Chen, X.; Oshima, K.; Schott, D.; Wu, H.; Hall, W.; Song, Y.; Tao, Y.; Li, D.; Zheng, C.; Knechtges, P.; et al. Assessment of treatment response during chemoradiation therapy for pancreatic cancer based on quantitative radiomic analysis of daily CTs: An exploratory study. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0178961.
Bodalal, Z.; Trebeschi, S.; Nguyen-Kim, T.D.L.; Schats, W.; Beets-Tan, R. Radiogenomics: Bridging imaging and genomics. Abdom. Radiol. 2019, 44, 1960–1984.
Attiyeh, M.A.; Chakraborty, J.; McIntyre, C.A.; Kappagantula, R.; Chou, Y.; Askan, G.; Seier, K.; Gonen, M.; Basturk, O.; Balachandran, V.P.; et al. CT Radiomics Associations with Genotype and Stromal Content in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Abdom. Radiol. 2019, 44, 3148–3157.
Lim, C.H.; Cho, Y.S.; Choi, J.Y.; Lee, K.-H.; Lee, J.K.; Min, J.H.; Hyun, S.H. Imaging Phenotype Using 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography–Based Radiomics and Genetic Alterations of Pancreatic Ductal Adeno-Carcinoma. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2020, 47, 2113–2122.
Iwatate, Y.; Hoshino, I.; Yokota, H.; Ishige, F.; Itami, M.; Mori, Y.; Chiba, S.; Arimitsu, H.; Yanagibashi, H.; Nagase, H.; et al. Radiogenomics for predicting p53 status, PD-L1 expression, and prognosis with machine learning in pancreatic cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2020, 123, 1253–1261.
McGovern, J.M.; Singhi, A.D.; Borhani, A.A.; Furlan, A.; McGrath, K.M.; Zeh, H.J.; Bahary, N.; Dasyam, A.K. CT Radi-ogenomic Characterization of the Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres Phenotype in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2018, 211, 1020–1025.
Gao, J.; Chen, X.; Li, X.; Miao, F.; Fang, W.; Li, B.; Qian, X.; Lin, X. Differentiating TP53 Mutation Status in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Using Multiparametric MRI-Derived Radiomics. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11.
Katabathina, V.S.; Marji, H.; Khanna, L.; Ramani, N.; Yedururi, S.; Dasyam, A.; Menias, C.O.; Prasad, S.R. Decoding Genes: Current Update on Radiogenomics of Select Abdominal Malignancies. RadioGraphics 2020, 40, 1600–1626.

©Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons-Attribution ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Upload a video for this entry

Information

Subjects: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging

Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :

Justin Chen

Kiersten Preuss

Chi Zhang

Michael Hollingsworth

View Times: 328

Update Date: 01 Apr 2022

Table of Contents

Video Upload Options

Confirm