Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Moslem Uddin
 -- 2128 2022-03-30 09:01:43 |
2 update references and layout
Amina Yu
 -3 word(s) 2125 2022-03-30 09:45:33 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Uddin, M.; Rana, M.M.; Atef, M.; Sarkar, M.R.; Shafiullah, G. Peak Load Shaving in Microgrid. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/21156 (accessed on 03 August 2024).
Uddin M, Rana MM, Atef M, Sarkar MR, Shafiullah G. Peak Load Shaving in Microgrid. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/21156. Accessed August 03, 2024.
Uddin, Moslem, Md Masud Rana, Mohamed Atef, Md. Rasel Sarkar, Gm Shafiullah. "Peak Load Shaving in Microgrid" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/21156 (accessed August 03, 2024).
Uddin, M., Rana, M.M., Atef, M., Sarkar, M.R., & Shafiullah, G. (2022, March 30). Peak Load Shaving in Microgrid. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/21156
Uddin, Moslem, et al. "Peak Load Shaving in Microgrid." Encyclopedia. Web. 30 March, 2022.
Peak Load Shaving in Microgrid
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/en15062278

Peak load is a particularly sensitive issue for microgrids as it happens occasionally for a small percentage of the time in a day. Peak load increases the risk of microgrid failure and also leads to power quality issues. To maintain grid stability and improve power quality, the microgrids must solve the peak loading problem.

peak shaving microgrids battery energy storage system energy distribution technique

1. Introduction

Rural electrification is a critical issue around the world. It is widely acknowledged that distributing electrical power to rural areas has always been a significant challenge due to the nature of rural communities, which are separated and located far from power generation plants [1][2]. Long-distance cable/line construction and maintenance are inefficient in remote locations. As a result, rural communities with little or no connection to primary grids can only rely on microgrids or independent smaller power networks for power [3][4][5]. Traditionally, these microgrids used diesel generators and backup systems (peaking generator) because of the low initial cost and simplicity [6]. Similarly, industries that are far away from the power grid, such as oil platforms in the sea, have the same issue. These industries rely on the expensive gas turbine generators (both as primary generators and peaking generators) [7]. In recent years, the advancements in grid technologies have allowed microgrid technologies to reach a more mature state where wind and solar renewable energies are the commonly integrated sources in a microgrid [8][9][10]. Despite the advantage of renewable sources, these microgrids, if isolated from the main grid, can be easily affected by power fluctuations, which will subsequently lead to unbalances in the power demand and supply system [11][12][13]. This undesirable event is mainly caused by the intermittent nature of the sources of renewable energy as well as the dynamic load profile, particularly during peak load [14][15].
In the past, the peak load problem is often solved by capacity additions [16]. Commonly, a percentage of total installed capacity must be reserved for managing peak loads, where the rest of the capacity is dedicated to the base-load. However, the solution leads to inefficient use of generators, where it is economically not feasible for utilities to maintain generation capacity that will be used only for a very few hours in a day. It has also several disadvantages, such as it consumes more fuel, creates higher wear and tear on equipment [17][18], increases maintenance cost, and leads to higher carbon emission [19][20]. Thus, peak load shaving is a more desirable method to face the challenges of peak load demand. Potential peak shaving strategies identified in the literature are: implementation of demand-side management (DSM), incorporation of electric vehicle (EV), incorporation of energy storage system (ESS) and integration of hybrid photovoltaic (PV)/ESS. However, the integration of ESS is the most appealing prospective peak load shaving options [21]. This technique can be applied in microgrids, grid, industries and residential buildings to achieve “peak shaving”. With this strategy, peak shaving (PS) can be performed by charging the ESS when demand is low (off-peak period) and discharging it when demand is high (peak time) [22]. The functions of storage-based peak shaving are illustrated in Figure 1. This operation of the ESS can provide economic benefits as it mitigates the need to use high-priced peak electricity generation. The real benefit of ESS-based peak shaving is that it allows a microgrid utility to cut peak demand while maintaining customer comfort [23]. To address the intermittent nature of renewable energy sources, appropriate energy storage solutions for the power grid must be developed. Electrochemical energy conversion and storage (EECS) systems are particularly promising in this area due to high turnover efficiencies, quick response times, ease of scalability, and lack of geographical limits [24].
Energies 15 02278 g001 550
Figure 1. Illustrative example of storage based-peak shaving.

2. Peak Demand and Peak Shaving in Microgrid

In this section, the impact of peak load demand in a microgrid system is presented. In addition, the importance of minimizing the peak demand for economical and realistic operation is discussed.
Microgrids, particularly those in isolated operations, have a lot of volatility in demand across time, which causes peaks in load profile [25][26]. Peaks in electrical demand introduce many perplexities in microgrid operation. Generators in fuel-based islanded microgrids typically perform inefficiently due to peaks in demand, with some even experiencing low load operation. A microgrid utility faces a significant challenge in managing time-varying demand during peak periods [17][27][28][29][30][31][32]. If the generation system fails to perfectly match the electricity demand, several issues arise, including instability [33], voltage fluctuation [34], and reliability [33][35][36], all of which have an impact on the entire electrical system [37][38]. These issues can manifest themselves as wear and tear on generation equipment as well as poor power quality [17]. Meanwhile, to reduce peak load, the supply current must be greatly increased. On the other hand, increasing supply current will reduce system efficiency as current is nonlinearly related to power loss [39][40]. Furthermore, the microgrid system’s components are all oversized to meet peak demand, although peak demand appears infrequently. As a result, when running at part load, some system components, such as transformers, are less efficient [41]. This has an impact on the system’s total losses.
As microgrids are small, they do not usually include a peaking generator, such as a primary grid system, to deal with peak demand. As a result, microgrids are designed to accommodate both base and peak loads. However, generators mostly operate inefficiently (during periods of light loads) as peaks only last a few hours in a day. Increased power consumption at peak periods necessitates an increase in the supply of raw materials (gas, fuel, and so on) to the generators. Thus, stress on microgrids keeps increasing, which has an impact on efficiency. In some cases, microgrids set aside a percentage of their total capacity (at least 10%) to mitigate peak demands. This backup capacity is primarily supplied by small diesel and gas generators. This type of power plant, however, has high operation and maintenance (O&M) costs [42][43][44]. As these generators are only operated during peak load hours, outdated and inefficient plants are employed to meet peak demand. These plants have a cheap capital cost, but a high operating and maintenance cost. To recover capital expenses, as well as operating and maintenance costs, within their lifetimes, these plants’ electricity becomes more expensive than that of any base-load facility [45].
Furthermore, they use more fuel, cause more wear and tear, and result in substantial carbon emissions [41]. As a result, peak load shaving is becoming a topic of interest in academia [32]. It enables microgrid utilities to drive down the cost of energy production while prolonging investment in generation and distribution assets [46].

3. Peak Shaving Using DSM

Demand-side management, in the context of electric utilities, refers to programs that may persuade customers to balance their electricity use with the generation capacity of the power supply system [47][48][49]. The DSM is divided into two sections: (i) demand response (DR) and (ii) energy efficiency. DR is mainly used to reduce peak height. It is described as deviations from normal consumption patterns by demand-side resources in reaction to variations in electricity prices over time or to incentive payments aimed to induce lower energy use at times of high wholesale market prices or when system dependability is compromised. The implementation of DR programs is more difficult. A novel peak shaving approach was proposed using DR in [50]. The results show that the grid-tied peak line’s power is significantly reduced while achieving optimal energy management.
The following are some challenges encountered during deployment of the DR-based peak shaving strategy:
  • The installation of demand response solutions may have an impact on customers’ comfort levels.
  • Customers may be unwilling to move their activity from peak to off-peak times. This is especially true in countries where the peak demand price has yet to be implemented.
  • Implementing demand response strategies will enhance the complexity of the overall system operation.
  • Advanced metering, control methods, communications systems, and information technologies are not fully available in the existing power systems. These information and communication technology (ICT) infrastructures need to be introduced which require multi–million dollar investment.

4. Peak Shaving Using ESS

The most promising peak-shaving option is to connect energy storage systems to the grid [51][52][53]. This method can be employed in residential structures, industries, and grids to accomplish “peak-shaving”. Peak shaving is accomplished with this strategy by charging ESS when demand is low (off-peak period) and discharging when demand is high [8][30][54]. Electrochemical technology-based battery energy storage systems (BESSs) are most commonly used for peak load shaving, among other energy storage technologies [39][55][56][57]. Applications of various batteries for peak shaving are reported in literature, such as lithium battery [58], sodium sulfur (NaS) battery [59], and redox flow battery [60]. The benefit of BESS-based peak shaving in microgrids is well documented in [61]. It is found that overall revenue from the proposed system is 1.84 times that of the capital investment of the battery.
Despite the potential benefits of ESS for peak shaving, some important hurdles in ESS deployment must be overcome:
  • A fundamental challenge for such a system’s implementation is determining the ideal ESS size. The installing ESS at a random or non-optimal size can result in higher system losses and increased capital investment for storage.
  • It is also difficult to schedule ESS for optimal performance.
  • Storage–based peak shaving is more practical for grid application. However, it requires large-scale ESS installation which is a real concern. It is challenging to operate and maintain the large-scale ESSs in the grid.
  • The high capital cost of ESS makes this peak shaving strategy impractical to employ.

5. Peak Shaving Using EVs

Electric vehicles (EVs) are not commonly used at the moment. However, given the growing worry over energy depletion, they are projected to become more popular globally in the future years [62]. Since electric vehicles’ storage energy is rarely fully utilized each day, this technology has the potential to provide peak shaving services [63][64]. Padhi et al. has examined EV-based peak shaving in microgrids [65]. It was proposed an optimal recharging strategy for EVs using quadratic programming (QP) to flatten the peak demand. It was concluded that the end user can enjoy substantial savings using the proposed technique. Alam et al. [66] presented a viable technique for using plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) batteries for both travel and peak shaving. A dynamic discharge rate was introduced to make the best use of PEV batteries for peak shaving. Finally, the proposed technique was tested in Australia using real-world PEV data. Other research using EVs to provide peak shaving service can be found in [67][68][69][70].
The following are some of the potential obstacles to using EVs for peak shaving:
  • Multiple EVs are required to provide peak shaving service as a single EV is unable to meet the peak demand. Thus, the discharge operation of a large number of EVs must be coordinated. However, owners’ may not be willing to hand over the control of their vehicles to a third party. Therefore, willingness of car owners’ is a real barrier for implementing this strategy.
  • As EVs can only deliver electricity while parked, the key problem of this technique is the availability of EVs. Furthermore, electric vehicles are yet to be generally adopted.
  • As electric vehicles have yet to be extensively adopted, parking spaces for them are plentiful. Furthermore, the require control system and necessary infrastructure for EV grid integration is not universally available. These could be the biggest obstacles to EV adoption in densely populated places.
  • It is difficult to synchronize the charging and discharging of a large number of electric vehicles.

6. Peak Shaving Using Hybrid PV/ESS System

Photovoltaic (PV) units with BESSs can significantly lower system operating costs. BESSs can store electrical energy generated by solar panels and/or generators [71]. The primary requirement for a BESS in a PV-connected power system is charge–discharge operation. The BESS charge–discharge process has a direct impact on the price of electricity per unit. During off-peak periods, the BESS unit can absorb electrical energy and deliver the stored energy during peak periods. In general, the price of power per unit is lower during off-peak periods than during peak periods. The charge–discharge operation of BESS in a PV-connected microgrid system should be the first priority for economic operation in order to reduce total electricity consumption costs. Rana et al. [36] investigated PV/BESS-based peak shaving opportunities for the microgrid. The findings shed new light on peak shaving with a hybrid PV/BESS system. It was concluded that the proposed technique could mitigate the available power issues for hybrid PV-BESS connected systems and minimize the operating cost by optimally dispatching the generation units.
The possible challenges for implementing this technique are highlighted below:
  • The output of PV is constrained by its fluctuating nature.
  • Energy storages are used to improve the availability and quality of microgrid supply. However, they require an efficient control strategy to manage the charge/discharge cycles.
  • Coordination of renewable sources, storage system, and load are not straightforward/trivial.

References

  1. Domenech, B.; Ferrer-Martí, L.; Pastor, R. Comparison of various approaches to design wind-PV rural electrification projects in remote areas of developing countries. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Energy Environ. 2019, 8, e332.
  2. Kyriakarakos, G.; Papadakis, G. Multispecies swarm electrification for rural areas of the developing world. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 3992.
  3. Topa Gavilema, Á.O.; Álvarez, J.D.; Torres Moreno, J.L.; García, M.P. Towards Optimal Management in Microgrids: An Overview. Energies 2021, 14, 5202.
  4. Kreishan, M.Z.; Zobaa, A.F. Optimal Allocation and Operation of Droop-Controlled Islanded Microgrids: A Review. Energies 2021, 14, 4653.
  5. Son, I.W.; Jeong, Y.; Son, S.; Park, J.H.; Lee, J.I. Techno-economic evaluation of solar-nuclear hybrid system for isolated grid. Appl. Energy 2022, 306, 118046.
  6. Sechilariu, M.; Locment, F. Urban DC Microgrid: Intelligent Control and Power Flow Optimization; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2016.
  7. Poullikkas, A. An overview of current and future sustainable gas turbine technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2005, 9, 409–443.
  8. Faisal, M.; Hannan, M.A.; Ker, P.J.; Hussain, A.; Mansor, M.B.; Blaabjerg, F. Review of energy storage system technologies in microgrid applications: Issues and challenges. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 35143–35164.
  9. Hirsch, A.; Parag, Y.; Guerrero, J. Microgrids: A review of technologies, key drivers, and outstanding issues. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 90, 402–411.
  10. Kuang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, B.; Li, C.; Cao, Y.; Li, L.; Zeng, L. A review of renewable energy utilization in islands. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 59, 504–513.
  11. Córdova, S.; Cañizares, C.; Lorca, Á.; Olivares, D.E. An Energy Management System with Short-Term Fluctuation Reserves and Battery Degradation for Isolated Microgrids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2021, 12, 4668–4680.
  12. Moon, H.J.; Kim, Y.J.; Chang, J.W.; Moon, S.I. Decentralised active power control strategy for real-time power balance in an isolated microgrid with an energy storage system and diesel generators. Energies 2019, 12, 511.
  13. Lee, H.J.; Vu, B.H.; Zafar, R.; Hwang, S.W.; Chung, I.Y. Design Framework of a Stand-Alone Microgrid Considering Power System Performance and Economic Efficiency. Energies 2021, 14, 457.
  14. Polleux, L.; Guerassimoff, G.; Marmorat, J.P.; Sandoval-Moreno, J.; Schuhler, T. An overview of the challenges of solar power integration in isolated industrial microgrids with reliability constraints. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 155, 111955.
  15. Kanakadhurga, D.; Prabaharan, N. Demand side management in microgrid: A critical review of key issues and recent trends. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 156, 111915.
  16. Rana, M.M.; Rahman, A.; Uddin, M.; Sarkar, M.R.; Shezan, S.A.; Ishraque, M.; Rafin, S.; Atef, M. A Comparative Analysis of Peak Load Shaving Strategies for Isolated Microgrid Using Actual Data. Energies 2022, 15, 330.
  17. Uddin, M.; Romlie, M.F.; Abdullah, M.F.; Halim, S.A.; Kwang, T.C. A review on peak load shaving strategies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 82, 3323–3332.
  18. ABB. Microgrids: Integration for Power Cost and Control; ABB Data Centers: Cary, NC, USA, 2015; Available online: www.abb.com/datacenters (accessed on 15 January 2021).
  19. Mishra, A.; Irwin, D.; Shenoy, P.; Zhu, T. Scaling distributed energy storage for grid peak reduction. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Future Energy Systems, Berkeley, CA, USA, 21–24 May 2013; pp. 3–14.
  20. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Electrical Energy Storage: White Paper; IEC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
  21. Neves, S.A.; Marques, A.C.; Fuinhas, J.A. On the drivers of peak electricity demand: What is the role played by battery electric cars? Energy 2018, 159, 905–915.
  22. Farsadi, M.; Sattarpur, T.; Yazdaninejadi, A. Simultaneously Optimal Placement and Operation Scheduling of BESSs and DGs in Distribution Networks in order to minimizing net present value related to power losses. IU-J. Electr. Electron. Eng. 2016, 16, 2081–2089.
  23. Arcos-Vargas, A.; Lugo, D.; Núñez, F. Residential peak electricity management. A storage and control systems application taking advantages of smart meters. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2018, 102, 110–121.
  24. Sun, C.; Negro, E.; Vezzù, K.; Pagot, G.; Cavinato, G.; Nale, A.; Bang, Y.H.; Di Noto, V. Hybrid inorganic-organic proton-conducting membranes based on SPEEK doped with WO3 nanoparticles for application in vanadium redox flow batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 309, 311–325.
  25. Gao, D.W. Energy Storage for Sustainable Microgrid; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2015.
  26. Oriti, G.; Julian, A.L.; Anglani, N.; Hernandez, G.D. Novel economic analysis to design the energy storage control system of a remote islanded microgrid. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2018, 54, 6332–6342.
  27. Aderibole, A.; Zeineldin, H.; Al Hosani, M. A Critical Assessment of Oscillatory Modes in Multi-Microgrids Comprising of Synchronous and Inverter Based Distributed Generation. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2018, 10, 3320–3330.
  28. Chua, K.H.; Lim, Y.S.; Morris, S. Cost-benefit assessment of energy storage for utility and customers: A case study in Malaysia. Energy Convers. Manag. 2015, 106, 1071–1081.
  29. Allam, M.A.; Said, A.; Kazerani, M. A Generic Modeling and Power-Flow Analysis Approach for Isochronous and Droop-Controlled Microgrids. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2018, 33, 5657–5670.
  30. García-Plaza, M.; Carrasco, J.E.G.; Alonso-Martínez, J.; Asensio, A.P. Peak shaving algorithm with dynamic minimum voltage tracking for battery storage systems in microgrid applications. J. Energy Storage 2018, 20, 41–48.
  31. Dongol, D.; Feldmann, T.; Schmidt, M.; Bollin, E. A model predictive control based peak shaving application of battery for a household with photovoltaic system in a rural distribution grid. Sustain. Energy Grids Netw. 2018, 16, 1–13.
  32. Joshi, K.A.; Pindoriya, N.M. Day-ahead dispatch of battery energy storage system for peak load shaving and load leveling in low voltage unbalance distribution networks. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting, Denver, CO, USA, 26–30 July 2015; pp. 1–5.
  33. Telaretti, E.; Dusonchet, L. Battery storage systems for peak load shaving applications: Part 1: Operating strategy and modification of the power diagram. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC), Florence, Italy, 7–10 June 2016; pp. 1–6.
  34. Uddin, M.; Romlie, M.F.; Abdullah, M.F. Performance Evaluation of Islanded Microgrid Using Load Flow Analysis Technique. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Intelligent and Advanced System (ICIAS) (ICIAS2018), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 13–14 August 2018.
  35. Masoum, A.S.; Deilami, S.; Moses, P.; Masoum, M.; Abu-Siada, A. Smart load management of plug-in electric vehicles in distribution and residential networks with charging stations for peak shaving and loss minimisation considering voltage regulation. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2011, 5, 877–888.
  36. Rana, M.M.; Romlie, M.F.; Abdullah, M.F.; Uddin, M.; Sarkar, M.R. A Novel Peak Load Shaving Algorithm for Isolated Microgrid Using Hybrid PV-BESS System. Energy 2021, 234, 121157.
  37. Gajduk, A.; Todorovski, M.; Kocarev, L. Stability of power grids: An overview. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 2014, 223, 2387–2409.
  38. Bruch, M.; Mnch, V.; Aichinger, M.; Kuhn, M.; Weymann, M.; Schmid, G. Power Blackout Risks: Risk Management Options Emerging Risk Initiative; Position Paper; CRO Forum: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011.
  39. Kalkhambkar, V.; Kumar, R.; Bhakar, R. Energy loss minimization through peak shaving using energy storage. Perspect. Sci. 2016, 8, 162–165.
  40. HA, M.P.; Kumar, L.; Ananthapadmanabha, T. A novel approach for optimal allocation of a distributed generator in a radial distribution feeder for loss minimization and tail end node voltage improvement during peak load. Int. Trans. Electr. Comput. Eng. Syst. 2014, 2, 67–72.
  41. Koh, S.L.; Lim, Y.S. Evaluating the economic benefits of peak load shifting for building owners and grid operator. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Smart Grid and Clean Energy Technologies (ICSGCE), Offenburg, Germany, 20–23 October 2015; pp. 30–34.
  42. Shirazi, E.; Jadid, S. Cost reduction and peak shaving through domestic load shifting and DERs. Energy 2017, 124, 146–159.
  43. Chua, K.H.; Lim, Y.S.; Morris, S. Battery energy storage system for peak shaving and voltage unbalance mitigation. Int. J. Smart Grid Clean Energy 2013, 2, 357–363.
  44. Zheng, M.; Meinrenken, C.J.; Lackner, K.S. Smart households: Dispatch strategies and economic analysis of distributed energy storage for residential peak shaving. Appl. Energy 2015, 147, 246–257.
  45. Van den Bergh, K.; Delarue, E. Cycling of conventional power plants: Technical limits and actual costs. Energy Convers. Manag. 2015, 97, 70–77.
  46. Nourai, A.; Kogan, V.; Schafer, C.M. Load leveling reduces T&D line losses. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2008, 23, 2168–2173.
  47. Yang, X.; Zhang, Y.; He, H.; Ren, S.; Weng, G. Real-time demand side management for a microgrid considering uncertainties. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2018, 10, 3401–3414.
  48. Li, D.; Chiu, W.Y.; Sun, H. Demand side management in microgrid control systems. In Microgrid; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 203–230.
  49. Bhamidi, L.; Sivasubramani, S. Optimal planning and operational strategy of a residential microgrid with demand side management. IEEE Syst. J. 2019, 14, 2624–2632.
  50. Shen, J.; Jiang, C.; Liu, Y.; Qian, J. A microgrid energy management system with demand response for providing grid peak shaving. Electr. Power Compon. Syst. 2016, 44, 843–852.
  51. Agamah, S.U.; Ekonomou, L. A heuristic combinatorial optimization algorithm for load-leveling and peak demand reduction using energy storage systems. Electr. Power Compon. Syst. 2017, 45, 2093–2103.
  52. Choudhury, S. Review of Energy Storage System Technologies integration to microgrid: Types, control strategies, issues, and future prospects. J. Energy Storage 2022, 48, 103966.
  53. Agamah, S.U.; Ekonomou, L. Peak demand shaving and load-levelling using a combination of bin packing and subset sum algorithms for electrical energy storage system scheduling. IET Sci. Meas. Technol. 2016, 10, 477–484.
  54. Agamah, S.U.; Ekonomou, L. Energy storage system scheduling for peak demand reduction using evolutionary combinatorial optimisation. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2017, 23, 73–82.
  55. Shin, M.; So, S.; Kim, K. A Control Approach of Battery Energy Storage Systems to Reduce kW Demand. In MATEC Web of Conferences; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2016; Volume 68, p. 10001.
  56. Motalleb, M.; Reihani, E.; Ghorbani, R. Optimal placement and sizing of the storage supporting transmission and distribution networks. Renew. Energy 2016, 94, 651–659.
  57. Sebastián, R. Application of a battery energy storage for frequency regulation and peak shaving in a wind diesel power system. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2016, 10, 764–770.
  58. Sun, B.; Su, X.; Wang, D.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Liang, H.; Gong, M.; Zhang, W.; Jiang, J. Economic analysis of lithium-ion batteries recycled from electric vehicles for secondary use in power load peak shaving in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 276, 123327.
  59. Liao, Q.; Sun, B.; Liu, Y.; Sun, J.; Zhou, G. A techno-economic analysis on NaS battery energy storage system supporting peak shaving. Int. J. Energy Res. 2016, 40, 241–247.
  60. Lucas, A.; Chondrogiannis, S. Smart grid energy storage controller for frequency regulation and peak shaving, using a vanadium redox flow battery. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2016, 80, 26–36.
  61. Uddin, M.; Romlie, M.; Abdullah, M.; Tan, C.; Shafiullah, G.; Bakar, A.H.A. A novel peak shaving algorithm for islanded microgrid using battery energy storage system. Energy 2020, 196, 117084.
  62. Shahab, M.; Wang, S.; Junejo, A.K. Improved Control Strategy for Three-Phase Microgrid Management with Electric Vehicles Using Multi Objective Optimization Algorithm. Energies 2021, 14, 1146.
  63. Achour, Y.; Ouammi, A.; Zejli, D. Model predictive control based demand response scheme for peak demand reduction in a Smart Campus Integrated Microgrid. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 162765–162778.
  64. Dagdougui, H.; Ouammi, A.; Dessaint, L.A. Peak load reduction in a smart building integrating microgrid and V2B-based demand response scheme. IEEE Syst. J. 2019, 13, 3274–3282.
  65. Padhi, C.K.; Panda, S.; Biswal, G.R. Optimal Recharging of EVs for Peak Power Shaving and Valley Filling using EV-Aggregator model in a Micro-grid. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1854, 012016.
  66. Alam, M.J.E.; Muttaqi, K.M.; Sutanto, D. A controllable local peak shaving strategy for effective utilization of PEV battery capacity for distribution network support. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2014, 51, 2030–2037.
  67. Singh, S.; Jagota, S.; Singh, M. Energy management and voltage stabilization in an islanded microgrid through an electric vehicle charging station. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 41, 679–694.
  68. Sbordone, D.; Bertini, I.; Di Pietra, B.; Falvo, M.C.; Genovese, A.; Martirano, L. EV fast charging stations and energy storage technologies: A real implementation in the smart micro grid paradigm. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2015, 120, 96–108.
  69. Ioakimidis, C.S.; Thomas, D.; Rycerski, P.; Genikomsakis, K.N. Peak shaving and valley filling of power consumption profile in non-residential buildings using an electric vehicle parking lot. Energy 2018, 148, 148–158.
  70. Van Roy, J.; Leemput, N.; Geth, F.; Büscher, J.; Salenbien, R.; Driesen, J. Electric vehicle charging in an office building microgrid with distributed energy resources. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2014, 5, 1389–1396.
  71. Ouammi, A. Peak loads shaving in a team of cooperating smart buildings powered solar PV-based microgrids. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 24629–24636.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Engineering, Electrical & Electronic
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Moslem Uddin
,
Md Masud Rana
,
Mohamed Atef
,
Md. Rasel Sarkar
,
GM Shafiullah
View Times: 1.1K
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 30 Mar 2022
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Video Production Service
    Feedback