Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Ver. Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 At present, the structure and function of ITS2 has become increasingly clear. This information contributes greatly to the study of ITS2 evolutionary studies. + 856 word(s) 856 2020-09-07 05:53:11 |
2 format change -18 word(s) 838 2020-09-22 03:30:33 | |
3 format change + 151 word(s) 989 2020-09-22 03:41:40 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?


Are you sure to Delete?
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Zhang, W.; Tian, W.; Gao, Z.; Wang, G.; Zhao, H. ITS2 Secondary Structure. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 06 December 2023).
Zhang W, Tian W, Gao Z, Wang G, Zhao H. ITS2 Secondary Structure. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed December 06, 2023.
Zhang, Wei, Wen Tian, Zhipeng Gao, Guoli Wang, Hong Zhao. "ITS2 Secondary Structure" Encyclopedia, (accessed December 06, 2023).
Zhang, W., Tian, W., Gao, Z., Wang, G., & Zhao, H.(2020, September 21). ITS2 Secondary Structure. In Encyclopedia.
Zhang, Wei, et al. "ITS2 Secondary Structure." Encyclopedia. Web. 21 September, 2020.
ITS2 Secondary Structure

The secondary structure of ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) 

ribosome biogenesis ribosomal ITS2 secondary structure

1. Characteristics of ITS2 Secondary Structure

The first acknowledged ITS2 secondary structure was determined in S. cerevisiae based on chemical and enzymatic probing together with minimum free-energy calculation of the in vitro synthesized 37S pre-rRNA[1]. In this structure, ITS2 sequence folds extensively through long-range interaction adjacent to the 5′ end of 25S and the 3′ end of 5.8S, yielding five tightly base-paired helixes, which was later known as the "hairpin model" (Figure 1c). Subsequent verification tests in vivo showed that site-directed mutations or deletions on different sites of this structure could completely or partially block the maturation of 25S rRNA[2][3][4]. These findings supported the ITS2 "hairpin model" and showed its distinct functional components.

Figure 1. Overview of the ITS2 (internal transcribed spacer 2) processing and folding in the ribosome biogenesis of the yeast S. cerevisiae. (a) ITS2 location and processing in pre-rRNA from genome to transcriptome. ITS2 and ITS1 are intercalated in the 18S–5.8S–25S tandem arrays, separating the elements of the pre-rRNA. The endonucleolytic cleavage sites are labelled A–E on the pre-rRNA. ITS2 region is highlighted in dark red in each processing state. (b) ITS2 location in the secondary structure of the 5.8S/25S pre-RNA. The ITS2 and 5.8S are displayed in dark red and bright green, respectively; the six typical domains of 25S are labelled I–VI in distinct colors. (c) The three proposed secondary structure models for ITS2. The C2 cleavage site is highlighted in red in stem III of the ring-pin model. The secondary structure scheme is taken and modified from S. cerevisiae LSU (

Several experimental methods in vivo, such as cryo-EM, site-directed mutagenesis and chemical and structural probing are reliable to infer RNA secondary structures, but they are laborious and are not suitable for large dataset analyses. Alternatively, the most conventional method is use of thermodynamic energy optimization to predict secondary structures and then use phylogenetic comparative analysis to examine common structures from closely related lineages. Specifically, as more and more ITS2 structural features become available in databases[5], ITS2 secondary-structure predictions will be based not only on the nucleotide sequence but also on the templates for homology modeling, in which subtle structural motifs that rarely automatically fold by standard minimum free energy (MFE) approach are preset[6].

Unexpectedly, in silico prediction from a broad range of eukaryotic diversity has yielded two more ITS2 secondary-structure models, which are distinct from the "hairpin model" being found in yeast and a few other species. One is the “ring model”, which is detected mainly in vertebrates[2][7]. In this model structure, the 5′ to 3′ long-range interactions in the "hairpin model" disappear, wherein each strand folds by itself into two separate stems instead. In addition, the longest stem always shares a common short base-stem with another stems, thereby characterized as “giant stem with lateral branches” (Figure 1c). Collectively, four or five extended stems in this structure radiate from an open central core or ring.

The third ITS2 secondary-structure model termed "four-helix model"[8] or "ring-pin model"[9], is widely observed throughout the eukaryote[10][11][12]. In this structure, the longest stem of the ring model and its two neighboring stems merge together into a much longer stem. Therefore, the “ring-pin model” is typically recognizable as a much longer helix together with three relatively short helices radiating from an open central ring. Notably, not all the eukaryotes have the fixed four helices because the helix I and helix IV are most variable and may disappear in some organisms (Figure 1c). In contrast, the longest helix III and its neighboring helix II are more stable and common to all eukaryotes. The basal pairing of the helices I and helix II are usually base-paired conserved and serve as a scaffold for shaping the structure. The most conserved component of helix III at the tip of the helix, and in land plants a hallmark motif UGGU, exist in this region[8][10].

2. Dynamic Model of ITS2 Secondary Structure

Cote et al. first examined the occurrence and functional significance of the distinct ITS2 structures between the "hairpin model" and "ring model" using functional genetic assay[13]. Unexpectedly, they found both model structures are necessary in vivo. Given their different effects on downstream processing, Cote et al. hypothesized that the "ring model" structure promotes AFs binding and is required in earlier pre-rRNA complex assembly, and is then followed by an induced “zipping up” transition to the “hairpin model” structure that facilitates formation of the ITS2 proximal stem. This idea is supported by the recent high-resolution cryo-EM structures of pre-60S particles which give convincing evidence that ITS2 function through conformational changes[14][15]. This process is also coordinated with stepwise binding or separating of AFs, by which the transient structure complex can be stabilized or flexible to another change[16]. In contrast, Burlacu et al. monitored rRNA restructuring processing events from 35S to 27SB using a high-throughput RNA structure probing method (ChemModSeq15), by which they quantified the nucleotide flexibilities of ITS2 structure[9]. The result showed that ITS2 generally maintains a conserved structure, which agrees best with the “ring-pin model”. Thus, it remains largely elusive whether ITS2 functions with a fixed or dynamic conformational model.

Although each model has been confirmed by alternative methods, the current three ITS2 secondary-structure models are more or less derived from minimum free energy folding (MFE). Actually, ITS2 does not fold and function by itself but is mutually interdependent with dozens of AFs that function as chaperones and scaffolds to direct and stabilize ITS2 folding[9][17][18]. It is reasonable to speculate that the final ITS2 folding shape does not necessarily follow the law of thermodynamics. It is not surprising that the proposed structure in vivo is rarely automatically yielded by standard MFE folding. Despite recent advances in cryo-EM that have provided detailed portions of ITS2 secondary-structure information[19], it is still challenging to get a comprehensive ITS2 secondary structure from the snapshots of a number of assembly intermediates.


  1. Lee-Chuan C. Yeh; John C. Lee; Structural analysis of the internal transcribed spacer 2 of the precursor ribosomal RNA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Molecular Biology 1990, 211, 699-712, 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90071-s.
  2. C. A. Cote; Role of the ITS2-proximal stem and evidence for indirect recognition of processing sites in pre-rRNA processing in yeast. Nucleic Acids Research 2001, 29, 2106-2116, 10.1093/nar/29.10.2106.
  3. van der Sande, C.A.; Kwa, M.; van Nues, R.W.; van Heerikhuizen, H.; Raué, H.A.; Planta, R.J. Functional analysis of internal transcribed spacer 2 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribosomal DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 1992, 223, 899–910.
  4. van Nues, R.W.; Rientjes, J.M.; Morré, S.A.; Mollee, E.; Planta, R.J.; Venema, J.; Raué, H.A. Evolutionarily conserved structural elements are critical for processing of internal transcribed spacer 2 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae precursor ribosomal RNA. J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 250, 24–36
  5. Markus Ankenbrand; Alexander Keller; Matthias Wolf; Jörg Schultz; Frank Förster; ITS2 Database V: Twice as Much: Table 1.. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2015, 32, 3030-3032, 10.1093/molbev/msv174.
  6. Matthias Wolf; Marco Achtziger; Jörg Schultz; Thomas Dandekar; Tobias Müller; Homology modeling revealed more than 20,000 rRNA internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) secondary structures. RNA 2005, 11, 1616-1623, 10.1261/rna.2144205.
  7. N Joseph; E Krauskopf; M I Vera; B Michot; Ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) exhibits a common core of secondary structure in vertebrates and yeast.. Nucleic Acids Research 1999, 27, 4533-4540.
  8. Annette W. Coleman; ITS2 is a double-edged tool for eukaryote evolutionary comparisons. Trends in Genetics 2003, 19, 370-375, 10.1016/s0168-9525(03)00118-5.
  9. Elena Burlacu; Fredrik Lackmann; Lisbeth-Carolina Aguilar; Sergey Belikov; Rob Van Nues; Christian Trahan; Ralph D. Hector; Nicholas Dominelli-Whiteley; Scott L. Cockroft; Lars Wieslander; et al.Marlene OeffingerSander Granneman High-throughput RNA structure probing reveals critical folding events during early 60S ribosome assembly in yeast. Nature Communications 2017, 8, 714, 10.1038/s41467-017-00761-8.
  10. Schultz, J.; Maisel, S.; Gerlach, D.; Müller, T.; Wolf, M. A common core of secondary structure of the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) throughout the Eukaryota. RNA 2005, 11, 361–364.
  11. Coleman, A.W. Pan-eukaryote ITS2 homologies revealed by RNA secondary structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, 3322–3329.
  12. Coleman, A.W. Nuclear rRNA transcript processing versus internal transcribed spacer secondary structure. Trends Genet. 2015, 31, 157–163.
  13. Colette A Côté; Chris L Greer; Brenda A Peculis; Dynamic conformational model for the role of ITS2 in pre-rRNA processing in yeast. RNA 2002, 8, 786-797, 10.1017/s1355838202023063.
  14. Baßler, J.; Hurt, E. Eukaryotic ribosome assembly. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2019, 88, 281–306.
  15. Wu, S.; Tutuncuoglu, B.; Yan, K.; Brown, H.; Zhang, Y.; Tan, D.; Gamalinda, M.; Yuan, Y.; Li, Z.; Jakovljevic, J.; et al. Diverse roles of assembly factors revealed by structures of late nuclear pre-60S ribosomes. Nature 2016, 534, 133–137.
  16. Lisa Fromm; Sebastian Falk; Dirk Flemming; Jan Michael Schuller; Matthias Thoms; Elena Conti; Ed Hurt; Reconstitution of the complete pathway of ITS2 processing at the pre-ribosome.. Nature Communications 2017, 8, 1787, 10.1038/s41467-017-01786-9.
  17. Stephanie Biedka; Jelena Mićić; Daniel Wilson; Hailey M. Brown; Luke Diorio-Toth; John L. Woolford Jr.; Hierarchical recruitment of ribosomal proteins and assembly factors remodels nucleolar pre-60S ribosomes. Journal of Cell Biology 2018, 217, 2503-2518, 10.1083/jcb.201711037.
  18. Zahra Assur Sanghai; Linamarie Miller; Kelly R. Molloy; Jonas Barandun; Mirjam Hunziker; Malik Chaker-Margot; Junjie Wang; Brian T. Chait; Sebastian Klinge; Modular assembly of the nucleolar pre-60S ribosomal subunit. Nature 2018, 556, 126-129, 10.1038/nature26156.
  19. Shan Wu; Beril Tutuncuoglu; Kaige Yan; Hailey M. Brown; Yixiao Zhang; Dan Tan; Michael Gamalinda; Yi Yuan; Zhifei Li; Jelena Jakovljevic; et al.Chengying MaJianlin LeiMeng-Qiu DongJohn L. WoolfordNing Gao Diverse roles of assembly factors revealed by structures of late nuclear pre-60S ribosomes. Nature 2016, 534, 133-137, 10.1038/nature17942.
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to : , , , ,
View Times: 584
Revisions: 3 times (View History)
Update Date: 22 Sep 2020