2.5. Contributing Factors and Quality of Life
Onychophagia may be due to stress, boredom, or inactivity. For some individuals, onychophagia is an automatic behavior, meaning they unconsciously bite their nails during activities like waiting in line or reading a book. While for others, nail biting is intentional and they will often cease other activities to bite their nails
[13]. Onychophagia sufferers may report a build-up of tension trying to resist urges to bite, followed by relief or pleasure after biting. These patients are more likely to also have general anxiety disorder
[2]. One observational study explored the frequencies of nail biting in 40 undergraduate nail biters under 4 settings (alone; noncontingent social interaction, in which participants had conversation on neutral topics; academic demand, in which participants completed 20 math questions; and social disapproval, in which participants were reprimanded for nail biting). On average, students bit their nails more often when they were alone (6.48 times) and during academic demand (3.15 times) (chi-square = 84.1, df = 3,
p < 0.001). Nail biting improved with noncontingent social interaction (0.25 times) and with social disapproval (0.20 times)
[14].
Quality of life (QoL) may diminish in patients with severe cases of onychophagia, in which nail biting is frequent and causes significant psychological distress and considerable physical damage. Onychophagia is an unwanted habit and affected patients usually have made multiple attempts to stop but are unsuccessful in doing so. A questionnaire-based study of 339 medical students analyzed the influence of onychophagia on QoL and stigmatization. Nail biters had significantly higher QoL impairment scores compared to non-biters. Inability to stop biting (23.3 vs. 10;
p < 0.01), visible nail deformities (19.2 vs. 10;
p = 0.03), increased time spent on biting (
ρ = 0.28;
p = 0.02), and fingernail involvement (
ρ = 0.26;
p = 0.03) contributed further to QoL impairments. The level of stigmatization for nail biters was higher compared to non-biters (0.6 ± 1.2 vs. 0.2 ± 0.6 points, respectively;
p < 0.01)
[13]. In young children, social and family pressures to stop nail biting may negatively impact QoL and induce behavioral and emotional problems
[8].
Onychophagia is closely linked to high stress levels. In a cross-sectional study measuring the stress levels using a Perceived Stress Scale in university students with onychophagia, the median score was significantly higher for nail biters (29) compared to non-biters (28;
p = 0.001). Median QoL score was significantly lower for nail biters (26) compared to non-biters (28) (
p < 0.001)
[10].
2.6. Physical Exam
Although onychophagia is a common condition, perceived stigma may cause treatment delays, as patients may feel shame and avoid medical evaluation. Patients will rarely present with nail biting as a primary complaint, making it more challenging for physicians to diagnose onychophagia. Observation for nail biting in the examination room, thorough questioning of the patient’s nail habits in a non-judgmental way, and physical examination are important to identify onychophagia in the earlier stages.
Routine inspection of all twenty nail units is recommended for diagnosing onychophagia. A full-body skin examination, including the scalp and secondary hair, is performed to look for other evidence of other BFRBs (e.g., skin picking, hair pulling, nail picking), as they may coexist. Chronic nail biters are more likely to suffer from orodental abnormalities; therefore, inspection of the oral mucosa must not be overlooked.
Patients typically present with abnormally short and uneven nails, absent or ragged cuticles, and nail folds in different stages of healing (
Figure 1)
[1][15]. Other visible changes in the nail and periungual regions include linear and pinpoint hemorrhages, longitudinal melanonychia, transverse grooves, brittleness, macrolunula, and pterygium, a scar in the nail matrix
[16]. Dermatoscopic evaluation of onychophagia shows loss of nail plate with ragged distal nail borders
[16]. Onychophagia usually occurs in the fingernails, as toenails are rarely bitten
[3]. Because toenails are physically harder to bite compared to fingernails, toenail biting suggests possible psychiatric comorbidities
[9].
Figure 1. A 46-year-old nail biter with short, uneven nails and ragged cuticles. Nail folds are erythematous and in different stages of healing.
Onychophagia is relatively easy to diagnose clinically. Histopathological analysis is not necessary for diagnosing onychophagia; however, it may be warranted when other diagnoses are being considered. Onychophagia may mimic other nail conditions such as nail psoriasis, nail lichen planus, onychotillomania (nail picking), and chronic paronychia
[1][4]. A nail biopsy with histopathology would reveal findings consistent with trauma, such as entrapped red blood cells and focal hyperkeratosis
[1].
2.7. Complications
Nail-biting complications are not limited to the nail plate, and may affect the periungual region and oral cavity. In chronic nail biters, partial or complete loss of the nail plate can occur, exposing the nail bed. As a result, the nail bed keratinizes, leading to irreversible nail plate shortening
[16].
Chronic trauma to the nail matrix may lead to melanocytic activation, presenting clinically as longitudinal melanonychia. Gray-brown longitudinal bands of variable width may involve one or more nail plates
[16][17]. Nail biting can also predispose patients to secondary infections. Acute paronychia is typically due to inoculation of bacteria from the mouth to the fingers
[18]. The soft tissue surrounding the nail bed becomes erythematous, warm, and tender, with risk of developing into an abscess or, rarely, osteomyelitis
[19][20]. Chronic paronychia presents with loss of cuticle and nontender erythema of the nail folds, but is not due to bacteria, unlike acute paronychia. Other periungual infections include herpetic whitlow and subungual warts
[21][22].
Oral and dental complications include gingival injury, leading to swelling and abscess, increased incisor wear, malocclusion of teeth, apical root resorption, and rotation of the incisors
[1][13]. Recognition of these symptoms should prompt a referral to a dentist for further evaluation. Pain and dysfunction of the temporomandibular joint have also been reported in chronic nail biters
[23]. Patients with onychophagia have a higher oral bacterial burden. Colonization of the oral cavity by the
Enterobacteriaceae family, specifically
Enterobacter spp. and
Escherichia coli, is frequently seen in nail biters
[18][24]. This predisposes nail biters to local and systemic infections if there is oral trauma or when enteric bacteria are ingested.
2.8. Treatment
While nail biting is a difficult behavior to modify, a multidisciplinary approach can effectively manage onychophagia. Stimulus control, habit reversal training (HRT), and pharmacotherapy alone, or more commonly in combination, is frequently used for treatment (Table 1).
Table 1. Summary of onychophagia treatment studies.
Stimulus control procedures involve reducing outside triggers (e.g., splintered cuticles) or cues (e.g., stress, idleness, overstimulation), making nail biting physically difficult, and removing positive reinforcements (aversion therapy)
[31]. Preventative nail filing and trimming reduce the appearance of splintered cuticles to decrease nail-biting temptations. Professional manicures for men and women can reduce nail biting for patients who are motivated to preserve their manicure, and also serve to hide the dystrophic nails while the affected nails are growing out
[31]. Gloves or bandages around the fingers are physical barriers that make biting more difficult. However, patients may find these unacceptable options, since they may interfere with daily activities and reduce sensations in the fingers. They may also worsen feelings of embarrassment toward nail biting when worn in social settings.
Aversion therapy refers to the repeated pairing of an unwanted behavior with discomfort to break the habit
[31]. For nail biters, the application of an unpleasant-tasting polish to the nails interferes with the enjoyable aspect of biting. Aversion therapy is discouraged in younger children as it may induce opposition, leading to increased nail biting to attract attention
[32][33]. The success of aversion therapy is dependent on consistent reapplication of the polish. In patients struggling to remember to reapply polish, a nonremovable reminder (NrR) can be used as an alternative to aversion therapy. In a study of 80 nail biters, where half was treated using NrRs and the other half a bitter-tasting polish, the NrR group had a lower drop-out rate (12% vs. 26%) compared to the mild aversion therapy group, but both therapies were equally effective in reducing nail biting, including all participants who started the study (Wilks’s lambda: F2.59 = 110.94;
p < 0.0001). However, when considering only non-dropouts, mild aversion was more effective (Wilks’s lambda: F2.59 = 3.35;
p < 0.042). In addition, the results were sustainable, since nail-biting scores were lower at five months after the last therapy session than scores at baseline (
t(42) = 8.05;
p < 0.0001). Overall, NrRs are effective options for patients with aversion therapy noncompliance and may promote long-term behavior changes in nail biting
[25].
HRT is a technique that may be helpful in treating onychophagia. Initially described to treat tics and nervous habits, HRT involves three components: awareness training, competing response training, and social support
[31][34]. Awareness training brings the habit into consciousness by having the patient write or say aloud their triggers for nail biting and its negative consequences. Competing response training occurs once nail biting is brought into awareness. Patients learn alternative behaviors like fist clenching, clapping, or sitting on hands when they have the urge to bite
[35].
Several controlled trials have studied the effects of HRT in treating onychophagia
[26][27][36]. In a clinical trial of 30 adult nail biters comparing the efficacy of HRT to placebo using pre- and post-treatment nail length measurements, post-treatment nail lengths were significantly longer in the HRT group (12.1 ± 1.9 mm) compared to the placebo group (8.8 ± 1.6 mm) (F = 21.2, df = 1.22;
p < 0.01)
[26]. In another study of 97 adult nail biters, participants were randomized into the HRT group (
n = 45) or negative practice group (
n = 52), in which subjects simulated nail biting and told themselves how ridiculous their habit appeared. Nail-biting episodes decreased by 99% in the HRT group compared to a 60% reduction in the negative habit group (
p < 0.001)
[27].
One clinical trial compared the effectiveness of mild aversion therapy to HRT using a fist-clenching competing response. Although mild aversion and competing response techniques were both effective in reducing nail biting (
p < 0.01), the latter resulted in decreased nail fold erosions (
p < 0.05) and severity of nail biting (
p < 0.01) and increased participants’ feelings of nail-biting control (
p < 0.01) compared to the aversion therapy group
[28].
A support system (i.e., a family member or other person also trying to break their own habit) can also keep the patient accountable. These individuals regularly remind patients to stop biting and encourage the use of competing responses. Patients may also enroll in group therapy programs. The TLC Foundation for Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviors is a national organization that connects patients to other chronic nail biters in their region
[37].
Pharmacotherapy is a second-line treatment for nail biting
[31]. Currently, no drugs are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating BFRBs; however, some medications are helpful in managing onychophagia. There is a growing interest in using N-acetylcysteine (NAC) to treat BFRBs. NAC is a glutamate modulator that has been used in clinical trials on impulse control disorders, including onychophagia. In a double-blind, randomized clinical trial of 42 children and adolescents with onychophagia, nail length increased after treatment with 800 mg/day of NAC over a one-month period (5.21 mm) compared to placebo (1.18 mm;
p < 0.04). However, there was no significant difference between both groups after two months of NAC treatment. One patient in the NAC group reported headache, agitation, and social withdrawal, while another experienced severe aggression during NAC treatment. No adverse effects were noted in the placebo group
[29].
The tricyclic antidepressant (TCA), clomipramine (mean dose, 120 ± 48 mg/day), was superior to desipramine (mean dose, 135 ± 53 mg/day) in treating onychophagia in a 10-week double-blind cross-over trial of 25 patients. Based on three clinical biting scales (nail biting severity, nail biting impairment, and clinical progress), there was a greater decrease in biting in the clomipramine group compared to the desipramine group (F = 3.75,
p < 0.04; F = 5.27,
p < 0.02; F = 7.65,
p < 0.01, respectively). Associated adverse effects of both treatment drugs included dry mouth, fatigue, insomnia, constipation, sweating, and dizziness, requiring 11 subjects (44%) to drop out of the study. A two-fold increase in serum alanine aminotransferase levels was also reported in one patient taking clomipramine, which resolved after treatment discontinuation
[30].
Use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), bupropion, and lithium to treat onychophagia was successful in single case reports
[38][39][40][41]. Two nail biters with coexisting depression and bipolar disorder, treated with bupropion and lithium, respectively, had improvements in both their onychophagia and their respective psychiatric disorders. However, SSRIs should be prescribed with caution, as exacerbation of impulse-related disorders have been reported
[32][42].
Despite these promising results, there is limited evidence on the efficacy of using NAC and antidepressants to treat onychophagia. Larger clinical trials are necessary to determine the effective dosage and treatment protocol for their use.