Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Md Munir Mostafiz
 + 3001 word(s) 3001 2022-03-14 05:11:22 |
2 format correct
Conner Chen
 Meta information modification 3001 2022-03-14 09:56:59 | |
3 It looks good. We just added some keywords.
Md Munir Mostafiz
 + 11 word(s) 3012 2022-03-31 04:50:13 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Mostafiz, M.M.; Hassan, E. Methyl Benzoate as Insecticide. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/20536 (accessed on 24 November 2024).
Mostafiz MM, Hassan E. Methyl Benzoate as Insecticide. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/20536. Accessed November 24, 2024.
Mostafiz, Md Munir, Errol Hassan. "Methyl Benzoate as Insecticide" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/20536 (accessed November 24, 2024).
Mostafiz, M.M., & Hassan, E. (2022, March 14). Methyl Benzoate as Insecticide. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/20536
Mostafiz, Md Munir and Errol Hassan. "Methyl Benzoate as Insecticide." Encyclopedia. Web. 14 March, 2022.
Methyl Benzoate as Insecticide
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/agriculture12030378

The methyl benzoate is an effective pesticide against a range of different agricultural, stored product, and urban insect pests. Methyl benzoate has several important modes of action, including as a contact toxicant, a fumigant, an ovicidal toxin, an oviposition deterrent, a repellent, and an attractant.

methyl benzoate biopesticides biorational pesticides natural product environmentally-friendly Insect pest management sustainable agriculture

1. Introduction

The primary challenge for human societies has always been sufficient food. However, pests, diseases, and weeds have destroyed a considerable portion of the global annual crop production [1]. It has been a long time now that synthetic chemical pesticides have played an important role in controlling insect pests in crops [2][3]. Nevertheless, widespread use of these pesticides can lead to pesticide resistance, environmental degradation, contamination of underground water and soil, harming ecosystems and nontarget species, including humans [4][5][6][7][8]. Therefore, curbing synthetic pesticide use is an urgent matter [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16].
Some botanical pesticides (BPs) are biorational pesticides as they are less harmful to human health and the environment than synthetic pesticides [17][18][19][20][21]. BPs are derived from plant species in various families. They are obtained either as plant extracts or as essential oils (EOs) [3][22]. Presently, at least four kinds of BPs are widely used for insect control: pyrethrum, rotenone, neem, and EOs. These widely used BPs are also utilized along with three others that are more limited in use. They include ryania, nicotine, and sabadilla [23][24][25]. Aromatic plants generate EOs as secondary metabolites, which are the most common forms of BPs. Thus, they are composed of complex mixtures of chemical constituents and components with various functional groups (e.g., monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, phenylpropanoids) [10][19][26]. Different EOs have proven beneficial for pest control, and several studies have been undertaken [3][18][27][28]. The major constituents of EOs often display biological activity, such as insecticidal or ovicidal effects on insects.
Additionally, they demonstrate antibacterial effects against microbes [29][30][31][32]. Generally, EOs are less harmful to nontarget species than most conventional synthetic pesticides. Therefore, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the USA accepted them as safe for human consumption [33][34][35].
Some commercially available products derived from EOs or their constituents (e.g., oil products of neem, garlic, thyme, limonene, linalool, carvacrol, nicotine, and rotenone) are used in agriculture and urban pest management. Nonetheless, these products command only 1% of the global pesticide market [10][24][36]. Therefore, a significant opportunity exists in pest management to develop BPs as environmentally friendly tools.
EOs are volatile aromatic liquids extracted from different plant materials, such as flowers, leaves, and fruits [37][38]. Hardy and Michael [39] were among the earliest scientists to identify volatile compounds in feijoa (Feijoa sellowiana Berg [Myrtales: Myrtaceae]). They discovered that methyl benzoate (MBe) was the dominant active component of the aroma, accounting for more than 90% of the EO in feijoa. Moreover, MBe has been found in the EOs of many other plants, including jonquil (Narcissus jonquilla L.), tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa L.), ylang-ylang (Cananga odorata Lam.), ginger lily (Hedychium coronarium Koenig), jasmine (Jasminum grandiflorum L.), Bakul (Mimusops elengi L.), champaca (Michelia champaca L.), and pomelo (Citrus grandis L.) [40][41][42][43]. Therefore, MBe occurs widely in nature [44]. Recently, studies have identified the volatile component of MBe from fermented apple juice [13][14][45]. Furthermore, MBe derived from fermented apple juice has significant pesticidal activity against several insect pests, including spotted wing drosophila (Drosophila suzukii Matsumura [Diptera: Drosophilidae]), marmorated stink bug (Halyomorpha halys Stål [Hemiptera: Pentatomidae]), tobacco hornworm (Manduca sexta L. [Lepidoptera: Sphingidae]), diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella L. [Lepidoptera: Plutellidae]), and gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L. [Lepidoptera: Erebidae]) [13][14]. 

2. Natural Function and Sources of Methyl Benzoate

MBe (C8H8O2; molecular weight 136.15 gm/mol) is a volatile ester that occurs naturally as a metabolite in plants [44]. Various plants release MBe as a pleasant odor in nature [46], including flowers [47][48][49] and fruits [50][51][52][53][54]. Lepidopteran insects can be attracted to the floral scent of MBe, e.g., some hawk moths [55][56]. In addition, MBe is emitted from rice plants damaged by the larvae of the fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) [57]. FAW-induced volatiles, including MBe, are highly attractive to females of the FAW parasitoid, Cotesia marginiventris (Cresson) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) [57]. Silva et al. [58] reported that MBe occurs at significantly higher levels in the emissions of plants infested with the tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). MBe is particularly abundant in the aromas emitted from petunias (Petunia spp.) and snapdragons (Antirrhinum majus L.), functioning as a long-range attractant to lure bees such as the orchid bee, Euglossa cybelia (M.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae), for pollination [44][59][60][61][62][63]. In addition, MBe is a semiochemical that affects both intraspecific and interspecific interactions in a number of insect species [64].
MBe is recognized for its sweet, balsamic, and spicy floral odor. It is used as a fragrance ingredient and preservative in various personal care products, such as shampoos, shower products, face/neck products, liquid soaps, mouthwash, perfumes, hair colorants, and cosmetics [65][66]. MBe has low-to-moderate human toxicity by ingestion and inhalation. Hence, it is approved by the US FDA (21 CFR 172.515; FDA 2015) and the European Union (EU Regulation 1334/2008 & 178/2002; EU 2015) for use as a food-grade flavor ingredient. George [67] reported that MBe is used as a flavor ingredient in some chewing gums in concentrations of up to 45.63 mg/kg. Additionally, MBe biodegrades slowly in the atmosphere [68].

3. Extraction, Biosynthesis Pathway, and Chemical Properties of Methyl Benzoate

Extraction of essential oil from the peel of the aromatic fruit feijoa was done according to a procedure published by Peng et al. [37]. Extraction was optimized using steam distillation and hydro-distillation. Volatile and active aroma compounds, such as MBe, were characterized by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and headspace solid-phase microextraction combined with gas chromatography-olfactometry-mass spectrometry. In a procedure published by Feng et al. [45], the collection of MBe from fermented apple juice was explained.
MBe is a common component of floral scents, identified in more than 80 different plant species [55]. Nevertheless, the pathway for its biosynthesis is vastly unknown in most species, especially in monocots [69]. MBe is formed through methylation of benzoic acid, the biosynthesis of which is derived from the aromatic amino acid L-phenylalanine, an end product of the shikimate pathway [70]. In plants, benzoic acid biosynthesis occurs through multiple routes that arise from the phenylpropanoid pathway. It starts with the deamination of l-phenylalanine to trans-cinnamic acid by phenylalanine ammonia-lyase [70]. The peroxisomal β-oxidation pathway plays a vital role in the catabolism of fatty acids in animals, fungi, and plants [71]. In plants, β-oxidative pathways are involved in the biosynthesis of numerous primary metabolites, including benzoic acid [72]. The flowers of Petunia hybrida cv (Mitchell) emit high levels of benzenoid volatiles [73][74]. Recently, the core β-oxidative pathway of benzoic acid in this species was fully explained [72][75]. First, the committed step in this pathway is converting trans-cinnamic acid to its CoA thioester, cinnamoyl-CoA, catalyzed in petunias by a peroxisomal cinnamate-CoA ligase [76]. MBe is formed via a methylation reaction with benzoic acid as a substrate, catalyzed by S-adenosyl-l-methionine-dependent benzoic acid methyltransferase [48] (Figure 1).
Figure 1. The biosynthesis network for plant benzoic acid. The shikimate/chorismate pathway proposed the biosynthesis of methyl benzoate in plants by the shikimate/chorismate pathway and via phenylalanine. The carboxyl carbon of shikimate is labeled (®), as is the β-carbon of phenylalanine (®). The plant enzymes involved in plant benzoic acid biosynthesis for which genes have been cloned are also indicated. Black and blue arrows show the existence and absence, respectively, of genetic evidence for a given reaction. Black and dark red enzymes indicate the presence and absence, respectively, of biochemical evidence for a given response. Question marks indicate the proposed steps with no available information. CM, chorismate mutase; PDT, prephenate dehydratase; PPY-AT, phenylpyruvate aminotransferase; PAL, l-phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; Ph-CNL, Petunia hybrida cinnamoyl-CoA ligase; PhCHD, P. hybrida cinnamoyl-CoA hydratase/dehydrogenase; PhKAT1, P. hybrida 3-ketoacyl thiolase 1; TE, thioesterase; BALDH, benzaldehyde dehydrogenase; SAM, S-adenosyl-l-methionine; BAMT, benzoic acid methyltransferase.
MBe is a colorless liquid with intense floral and cherry aromas. It is soluble in methanol and ethyl ether but insoluble in water [77].

4. Insecticidal Effects of Methyl Benzoate

The toxicity of MBe can be classified by the various ways that it may affect target and nontarget organisms. For example, MBe can act via contact toxicity, fumigant activity, attraction or repellent action, oviposition deterrence, or insect growth regulator effects.

4.1. Contact Toxicants

Contact toxicants act externally to (1) dry the insect body; (2) create a gas-tight film that blocks regular gas exchange; or (3) penetrate the skin and affect the nervous system, etc., including through ovicidal activity (that is, killing the eggs by disrupting embryonic development and preventing hatching). When used on different arthropod pests, including sap-sucking hemipterans and phytophagous mites, MBe demonstrates potent contact toxicity [13][14][78][79][80]. The contact toxicity of MBe has been assessed using different methods [13][14][78][79][80][81]. However, the direct topical application of the product to the body surface of insects with a hand-held sprayer or syringe has been the most commonly used method.
The contact toxicity of MBe has been tested against the sweet potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), a primary pest of many agricultural and horticultural crops worldwide [82][83]. Mostafiz et al. [79] reported that the direct spray application of 1% MBe to adults of B. tabaci caused 100% mortality 24 h post-treatment (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Toxicity differences of methyl benzoate against various arthropod pests and nontarget organisms: Mortality data from 1% MBe concentration after 48 h of exposure.
The eggs and nymphs of B. tabaci are found on the underside of crop leaves. Application of 1% or 2% MBe via the leaf-dipping method, which ensures good coverage of the underside, caused a 75.6% and 94.2% reduction in egg hatch rate, respectively [79]. Similarly, adult eclosion following leaf-dipping with 1% MBe was reduced by 93.2% [79]. The lethal median concentration (LC50) values for MBe solutions on eggs, fourth-instar nymphs, and adults of B. tabaci were 0.3, 0.2, and 0.2% (v/v), respectively.
The cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii (Glover) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), is a polyphagous pest associated with more than 700 host plants worldwide [84][85]. Using a leaf-dipping assay, Mostafiz et al. [78] reported 100% mortality of third-instar nymphs and adults of A. gossypii 24 h after applying 1% MBe solution (Figure 2). The LC50 values for MBe solutions on nymphs and adults were 0.18% and 0.32% (v/v), respectively. Moreover, MBe showed acaricidal activity against the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Koch) (Acari: Tetranychidae) [80], which is one of the most destructive pests of ornamental and horticultural plants [86][87]. Egg hatch of this mite was reduced by 76.9% and 92.5%, respectively, in leaf-dipping assays with 0.5% and 1% MBe [80]. However, 24 h after exposure to 0.5 and 1% MBe, the mortality of T. urticae adults was 55.3% and 81.3%, respectively. The LC50 values for MBe solutions on eggs and adults were 0.27% and 0.38% (v/v), respectively.
Additionally, MBe induces acute toxicity in other pests, including the invasive fruit fly D. suzukii, the stink bug H. halys, and the lepidopterans P. xylostella, M. sexta, and L. dispar [13][14]. For example, 100% mortality of D. suzukii immature stages (Figure 2) was caused by the direct application of 1% MBe to pre-infested blueberries, with no larvae and pupae developing or adult flies emerging after 10 d of incubation at room temperature [14]. Compared with other EOs (α-terpinene, γ-terpinene, terpineol, cineole, and α-pinene), MBe is the most toxic metabolite for D. suzukii [14]. Furthermore, when used on H. halys nymphs, MBe has shown contact toxicity [14]. For the five nymphal instars tested, the LC50 values of MBe ranged from 1.01 to 2.39 μL/vial. In laboratory bioassays (LC50 values ranged from 0.26 to 2.70, µL/vial), the toxicity of MBe against nymphs of H. halys is comparable to that of two commercial pesticides (acetamiprid and pyriproxyfen) [14].
Feng and Zhang [14] assessed the ovicidal toxicity of MBe in a direct spray bioassay by measuring the hatch rate of eggs of H. halys, M. sexta, and P. xylostella. MBe exhibited ovicidal effects, with LC50 values of 0.020, 0.015, and 0.001 mg/cm2, respectively, for the three species listed. The ovicidal action of MBe was greater than that of a mixture of bifenthrin and ζ-cypermethrin. Reportedly, it was also greater than that of an EO product containing 2-phenethyl propionate and oils of clover, rosemary, and thyme [14]. Feng et al. [13] reported that MBe showed high larvicidal activity against L. dispar (LC50 = 0.114 mg/cm2), which was 1.94 times more toxic than acetamiprid (LC50 = 0.221 mg/cm2).
The red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta (Buren) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), native to South America but invasive in North America and Asia, is considered one of the world’s worst invasive species [88][89]. Recently, Chen et al. [90] demonstrated that contact toxicity to workers of S. invicta is due to topical application of MBe, with the highest mortality at a dose of 93.65 µg per ant. Moreover, MBe has demonstrated contact toxicity against the azuki bean weevil, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) [81]. Furthermore, Park et al. [81] reported that the topical application of MBe at a dose of 44.81 μg/beetle produced the highest mortality 24 h after treatment.
Recently, Larson et al. [91] reported that MBe displays contact toxicity against adults of Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae). The results showed that the LD50 value for MBe was 45.6 μg per adult female. Mostafiz et al. [92] found that MBe exhibits larvicidal activity against Aedes albopictus (Skuse) and Culex pipiens (L.) MBe was three times more harmful to Ae. albopictus than Cx. pipiens based on the findings.

4.2. Fumigant Toxicity

More than 100 species of insects cause significant economic losses to stored products [93][94]. Furthermore, fumigants are commonly used against these challenging pests. Fumigants enter the body as gases via the trachea and may influence the activities of different enzymes in the nervous system, muscular system, fat bodies, or other tissues. Thus, fumigant toxicity is often assessed using impregnated paper, allowing the product’s release into the air of a closed experimental chamber [95][96]. The experimental setup uses a sieve or mesh to prevent insects from coming into physical contact with the impregnated paper.
MBe has been shown to possess fumigant activity against various stored product pests [81][90][97][98][99][100]. According to Park et al. [81], MBe exhibited the highest fumigation toxicity against adult weevils of C. chinensis at 11.76 mg/L of air. The LC50 value was estimated to be 5.36 mg/L.
In treating fire ant mounds, fumigants have been used [101]. Recently, MBe displayed strong fumigation toxicity against workers of the invasive species S. invicta [90]. The highest percent mortality of ant workers 24 h after being fumigated with MBe occurred at a dosage of 1.43 µg/mL, with an LC50 value of 0.77 µg/mL. Morrison et al. [97] studied MBe as a possible environmentally friendly fumigant for the control of stored product beetles, including Rhyzopertha dominica (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae), Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), Sitophilus zeamais (Motschulsky) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), and Trogoderma variabile (Ballion) (Coleoptera: Dermestidae). Using 1080 mg/L of MBe, R. dominica was the most susceptible, followed closely by T. castaneum, whereas S. zeamais and T. variabile were much less susceptible to MBe [97].
The common bed bug, Cimex lectularius (L.) (Hemiptera: Cimicidae), whose incidence is on the rise worldwide, is a human health pest [102][103]. Larson et al. [98] reported that MBe caused 97% mortality of adult bed bugs 24 h after fumigation with 7.14 mg/L of MBe in Erlenmeyer flasks (volume ca. 280 mL).
MBe has been examined as a potential fumigant for controlling pests on apples at different temperatures and evaluated treatment effects on postharvest quality [99]. The pest species included western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae); lettuce aphid, Nasonovia ribisnigri (Mosley) (Hemiptera: Aphididae); rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae); and bulb mites, Rhizoglyphus spp. (Sarcoptiformes: Acaridae). F. occidentalis and N. ribisnigri were completely controlled in 8, 16, and 24 h at 25 °C, 13 °C, and 2 °C, respectively. For S. oryzae, complete control was achieved in 16 and 72 h with and without rice, respectively, at 25 °C. Furthermore, complete control of Rhizoglyphus spp. on peanuts was achieved in 64 h at 25 °C. Additionally, MBe fumigation for 24 h at 25 °C led to the full control of F. occidentalis. In addition, there was no negative impact on the visual quality of three varieties of apples four weeks after fumigation [99].
Most recently, Mostafiz et al. [100] reported that for controlling the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), MBe is superior to other botanical fumigants. Within 4 h of exposure using 1 µL/L air, MBe demonstrated high fumigant activity against adults of P. interpunctella. The LC50 of MBe was 0.1 µL/L air.

4.3. Repellents, Oviposition Deterrents, Attractants, and Developmental Disruptors

Repellents deter organisms from getting close to treated surfaces. Oviposition deterrents, which make ovipositing females move away, are included among repellents. Attractants entice or lure insects or natural enemies, whereas developmental disruptors alter or inhibit the development of eggs, larvae/nymphs, and pupae.
The direct airborne repellent test is suitable for testing volatile compounds without a contradicting effect due to a sense of taste [104][105]. It uses a bioassay tube constructed of clear plastic pipe with two open ends and a hole midway down the tube. Small chambers are formed at each end by inserting mesh net rings. One end is left empty as the control, whereas MBe-treated filter paper is placed at the other end. Randomly collected adults are released into the pipe via the middle hole, and their position is recorded [79].
Using the test described above, MBe displayed repellent activities toward adults of B. tabaci under laboratory and greenhouse conditions [79]. The ability of MBe to repel B. tabaci was concentration- and time-dependent. At 2%, repellency was highest, MBe for 1 h, 3 h, and 6 h post-treatment, with repellencies of 78.2%, 82.1%, and 55.1%, respectively [79]. A choice test was conducted with MBe on treated tomato plants versus untreated plants; maximum repellency was found using a 2% MBe solution at 24 h (96.1%) and 48 h (89.1%) post-treatment [79]. Moreover, MBe acted as a strong oviposition deterrent against adult B. tabaci in a choice test. At a 2% MBe solution for 24 h (98.2% deterrence) and 48 h (94.9% deterrence) post-treatment, the most effective oviposition deterrent was observed [79].
The behavior of T. urticae adult females was strongly affected by MBe under greenhouse conditions [80]. At 24 h post-treatment, the highest repellent effects were observed. At this time, approximately 52%, 60%, 64%, and 84% of adult female mites were repelled at MBe concentrations of 0.1%, 0.25%, 0.5%, and 1%, respectively. Reportedly, the mites were repelled significantly by MBe-treated plants compared to water-sprayed plants throughout the 7-day experiment. The maximum observed repellencies recorded for this species were 91.9% for 1% MBe and 77.4% for 0.5% MBe at 24 h post-treatment [80].
In response to MBe in a laboratory bioassay, Larson et al. [106] determined the behavioral activity of the common bed bug. Reportedly, MBe repelled adult C. lectularius over a 1 h period. Furthermore, using an EthoVision video system designed to track the movement of individuals, the authors noted that MBe treatment resulted in a reduction in the time spent within the target zone. Finally, Zhang et al. [107] reported that MBe identified from ylang-ylang EO had strong repellent effects against the invasive stink bug H. halys. The authors found that MBe significantly reduced trap catches of H. halys by 72%. In particular, MBe was likely responsible for the repellency of the corresponding EO.
Conversely, the attraction of some species to MBe was demonstrated by Feng et al. [45]. They reported that a seven-component blend comprising MBe was more effective and selective for attracting D. suzukii under field conditions than the currently used standard apple cider vinegar bait.

References

  1. Culliney, T.W. Crop losses to arthropods. In Integrated Pest Management: Pesticide Problems; Pimentel, D., Peshin, R., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014; Volume 3, pp. 201–225.
  2. Damalas, C.A.; Koutroubas, S.D. Botanical pesticides for eco-friendly pest management. In Pesticides in Crop Production; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 181–193.
  3. Ebadollahi, A.; Ziaee, M.; Palla, F. Essential oils extracted from different species of the lamiaceae plant family as prospective bioagents against several detrimental pests. Molecules 2020, 25, 1556.
  4. Chen, M.; Chang, C.-H.; Tao, L.; Lu, C. Residential exposure to pesticide during childhood and childhood cancers: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2015, 136, 719–729.
  5. Damalas, C.A.; Eleftherohorinos, I.G. Pesticide exposure, safety issues, and risk assessment indicators. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2011, 8, 1402–1419.
  6. Goulson, D. REVIEW: An overview of the environmental risks posed by neonicotinoid insecticides. J. Appl. Ecol. 2013, 50, 977–987.
  7. Naqqash, M.N.; Gökçe, A.; Bakhsh, A.; Salim, M. Insecticide resistance and its molecular basis in urban insect pests. Parasitol. Res. 2016, 115, 1363–1373.
  8. Zikankuba, V.L.; Mwanyika, G.; Ntwenya, J.E.; James, A. Pesticide regulations and their malpractice implications on food and environment safety. Cogent. Food. Agric. 2019, 5, 1601544.
  9. Ahmed, M.; Peiwen, Q.; Gu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Sikandar, A.; Hussain, D.; Javeed, A.; Shafi, J.; Iqbal, M.F.; An, R.; et al. Insecticidal activity and biochemical composition of Citrullus colocynthis, Cannabis indica and Artemisia argyi extracts against cabbage aphid (Brevicoryne brassicae L.). Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 522.
  10. Campos, E.V.R.; Proença, P.L.F.; Oliveira, J.L.; Bakshi, M.; Abhilash, P.C.; Fraceto, L.F. Use of botanical insecticides for sustainable agriculture: Future perspectives. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 105, 483–495.
  11. Dougoud, J.; Toepfer, S.; Bateman, M.; Jenner, W.H. Efficacy of homemade botanical insecticides based on traditional knowledge—A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 39, 37.
  12. Falkowski, M.; Jahn-Oyac, A.; Odonne, G.; Flora, C.; Estevez, Y.; Touré, S.; Boulogne, I.; Robinson, J.-C.; Béreau, D.; Petit, P.; et al. Towards the optimization of botanical insecticides research: Aedes aegypti larvicidal natural products in French Guiana. Acta Trop. 2020, 201, 105179.
  13. Feng, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhang, A. Commercially available natural benzyl esters and their synthetic analogs exhibit different toxicities against insect pests. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 7902.
  14. Feng, Y.; Zhang, A. A floral fragrance methyl benzoate is an efficient green pesticide. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42168.
  15. Pavela, R.; Maggi, F.; Iannarelli, R.; Benelli, G. Plant extracts for developing mosquito larvicides: From laboratory to the field, with insights on the modes of action. Acta Trop. 2019, 193, 236–271.
  16. Ruttanaphan, T.; de Sousa, G.; Pengsook, A.; Pluempanupat, W.; Huditz, H.-I.; Bullangpoti, V.; Le Goff, G. A novel insecticidal molecule extracted from Alpinia galanga with potential to control the pest insect Spodoptera frugiperda. Insects 2020, 11, 686.
  17. Isman, M.B. A renaissance for botanical insecticides? Pest Manag. Sci. 2015, 71, 1587–1590.
  18. Pavela, R. History, presence and perspective of using plant extracts as commercial botanical insecticides and farm products for protection against insects—A review. Plant Prot. Sci. 2016, 52, 229–241.
  19. Pavela, R.; Benelli, G. Essential oils as ecofriendly biopesticides? challenges and constraints. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 1000–1007.
  20. Isman, M.B. Bridging the gap: Moving botanical insecticides from the laboratory to the farm. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 110, 10–14.
  21. Isman, M.B. Commercial development of plant essential oils and their constituents as active ingredients in bioinsecticides. Phytochem. Rev. 2020, 19, 235–241.
  22. Magierowicz, K.; Górska-Drabik, E.; Golan, K. Effects of plant extracts and essential oils on the behavior of Acrobasis advenella (Zinck.) caterpillars and females. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 2020, 127, 63–71.
  23. Campos, E.V.R.; De Oliveira, J.L.; Pascoli, M.; De Lima, R.; Fraceto, L.F. Neem oil and crop protection: From now to the future. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1494.
  24. Chaudhary, S.; Kanwar, R.K.; Sehgal, A.; Cahill, D.M.; Barrow, C.J.; Sehgal, R.; Kanwar, J.R. Progress on Azadirachta indica based biopesticides in replacing synthetic toxic pesticides. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 610.
  25. Isman, M.B. Botanical insecticides in the twenty-first century—Fulfilling their promise? Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2020, 65, 233–249.
  26. Pavela, R. Essential oils for the development of eco-friendly mosquito larvicides: A review. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 76, 174–187.
  27. Bhavya, M.L.; Chandu, A.G.S.; Devi, S.S. Ocimum tenuiflorum oil, a potential insecticide against rice weevil with anti-acetylcholinesterase activity. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 126, 434–439.
  28. Ma, S.; Jia, R.; Guo, M.; Qin, K.; Zhang, L. Insecticidal activity of essential oil from Cephalotaxus sinensis and its main components against various agricultural pests. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 150, 112403.
  29. Regnault-Roger, C.; Vincent, C.; Arnason, J.T. Essential oils in insect control: Low-risk products in a high-stakes world. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2011, 57, 405–424.
  30. Dhifi, W.; Bellili, S.; Jazi, S.; Bahloul, N.; Mnif, W. Essential oil chemical characterization and investigation of some biological activities: A critical review. Medicines 2016, 3, 25.
  31. Eslahi, H.; Fahimi, N.; Sardarian, A.R. Chemical composition of essential oils. In Essential Oils in Food Processing; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 119–171.
  32. Arena, J.S.; Merlo, C.; Defagó, M.T.; Zygadlo, J.A. Insecticidal and antibacterial effects of some essential oils against the poultry pest Alphitobius diaperinus and its associated microorganisms. J. Pest Sci. 2020, 93, 403–414.
  33. Burt, S. Essential oils: Their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods—A review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 94, 223–253.
  34. Marrone, P.G. Pesticidal natural products—Status and future potential. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 2325–2340.
  35. Pavela, R.; Govindarajan, M. The essential oil from Zanthoxylum monophyllum a potential mosquito larvicide with low toxicity to the non-target fish Gambusia affinis. J. Pest Sci. 2017, 90, 369–378.
  36. Isman, M.B.; Miresmailli, S.; Machial, C. Commercial opportunities for pesticides based on plant essential oils in agriculture, industry and consumer products. Phytochem. Rev. 2011, 10, 197–204.
  37. Peng, Y.; Bishop, K.S.; Quek, S.Y. Compositional analysis and aroma evaluation of feijoa essential oils from New Zealand grown cultivars. Molecules 2019, 24, 2053.
  38. Nematollahi, N.; Kolev, S.D.; Steinemann, A. Volatile chemical emissions from essential oils. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2018, 11, 949–954.
  39. Hardy, P.J.; Michael, B.J. Volatile components of feijoa fruits. Phytochemistry 1970, 9, 1355–1357.
  40. Yang, Y.; Isman, M.B.; Tak, J.-H. Insecticidal activity of 28 essential oils and a commercial product containing Cinnamomum cassia bark essential oil against Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky. Insects 2020, 11, 474.
  41. Cheong, M.-W.; Loke, X.-Q.; Liu, S.-Q.; Pramudya, K.; Curran, P.; Yu, B. Characterization of volatile compounds and aroma profiles of Malaysian pomelo (Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck) blossom and peel. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2011, 23, 34–44.
  42. Tisserand, R.; Young, R. Essential Oil Safety: A Guide for Health Care Professionals, 2nd ed.; Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh, UK, 2013.
  43. Cheong, M.-W.; Liu, S.-Q.; Yeo, J.; Chionh, H.-K.; Pramudya, K.; Curran, P.; Yu, B. Identification of aroma-active compounds in Malaysian pomelo (Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck) peel by gas chromatography-olfactometry. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2011, 23, 34–42.
  44. Dudareva, N.; Murfitt, L.M.; Mann, C.J.; Gorenstein, N.; Kolosova, N.; Kish, C.M.; Bonham, C.; Wood, K. Developmental regulation of methyl benzoate biosynthesis and emission in snapdragon flowers. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 949–961.
  45. Feng, Y.; Bruton, R.; Park, A.; Zhang, A. Identification of attractive blend for spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii, from apple juice. J. Pest Sci. 2018, 91, 1251–1267.
  46. Choudhary, M.I.; Naheed, N.; Abbaskhan, A.; Musharraf, S.G.; Siddiqui, H.; Atta-ur-Rahman. Phenolic and other constituents of fresh water fern Salvinia molesta. Phytochemistry 2008, 69, 1018–1023.
  47. Knudsen, J.; Tollsten, L. Trend in floral scent chemistry in pollination syndromes: Floral scent composition in moth-pollinated taxa. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 1993, 113, 263–284.
  48. Effmert, U.; Saschenbrecker, S.; Ross, J.; Negre, F.; Fraser, C.M.; Noel, J.P.; Dudareva, N.; Piechulla, B. Floral benzenoid carboxyl methyltransferases: From in vitro to in planta function. Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 1211–1230.
  49. Shi, S.; Duan, G.; Li, D.; Wu, J.; Liu, X.; Hong, B.; Yi, M.; Zhang, Z. Two-dimensional analysis provides molecular insight into flower scent of Lilium “Siberia”. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5352.
  50. Shaw, G.J.; Ellingham, P.J.; Birch, E.J. Volatile constituents of feijoa—Headspace analysis of intact fruit. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1983, 34, 743–747.
  51. Young, H.; Paterson, V.J.; Burns, D.J.W. Volatile aroma constituents of kiwifruit. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1983, 34, 81–85.
  52. Bartley, J.; Schwede, A. Production of volatile compounds in ripening kiwi fruit (Actinidia chinensis). J. Agric. Food Chem. 1989, 37, 1023–1025.
  53. Binder, R.G.; Flath, R.A. Volatile components of pineapple guava. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 1989, 37, 734–736.
  54. Froehlich, O.; Duque, C.; Schreier, P. Volatile constituents of curuba (Passiflora mollissima) fruit. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 1989, 37, 421–425.
  55. Knudsen, J.T.; Tollsten, L.; Bergström, L.G. Floral scents—A checklist of volatile compounds isolated by head-space techniques. Phytochemistry 1993, 33, 253–280.
  56. Levin, R.A.; Raguso, R.A.; McDade, L.A. Fragrance chemistry and pollinator affinities in Nyctaginaceae. Phytochemistry 2001, 58, 429–440.
  57. Zhao, N.; Guan, J.; Ferrer, J.-L.; Engle, N.; Chern, M.; Ronald, P.; Tschaplinski, T.J.; Chen, F. Biosynthesis and emission of insect-induced methyl salicylate and methyl benzoate from rice. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 279–287.
  58. Silva, D.B.; Weldegergis, B.T.; Van Loon, J.J.A.; Bueno, V.H.P. Qualitative and quantitative differences in herbivore-induced plant volatile blends from tomato plants infested by either Tuta absoluta or Bemisia tabaci. J. Chem. Ecol. 2017, 43, 53–65.
  59. Schiestl, F.P.; Roubik, D.W. Odor compound detection in male euglossine bees. J. Chem. Ecol. 2003, 29, 253–257.
  60. Murfitt, L.M.; Kolosova, N.; Mann, C.J.; Dudareva, N. Purification and characterization of S-adenosyl-L-methionine: Benzoic acid carboxyl methyltransferase, the enzyme responsible for biosynthesis of the volatile ester methyl benzoate in flowers of Antirrhinum majus. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2000, 382, 145–151.
  61. Kolosova, N.; Gorenstein, N.; Kish, C.M.; Dudareva, N. Regulation of circadian methyl benzoate emission in diurnally and nocturnally emitting plants. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 2333–2347.
  62. Negre, F.; Kish, C.M.; Boatright, J.; Underwood, B.; Shibuya, K.; Wagner, C.; Clark, D.G.; Dudareva, N. Regulation of methyl benzoate emission after pollination in snapdragon and petunia flowers. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 2992–3006.
  63. Heinrich, B. Bumblebee Economics; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2004.
  64. El-Sayed, A.M. The Pherobase: Database of Insect Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Available online: http://www.pherobase.com (accessed on 25 January 2022).
  65. Bickers, D.R.; Calow, P.; Greim, H.A.; Hanifin, J.M.; Rogers, A.E.; Saurat, J.-H.; Glenn Sipes, I.; Smith, R.L.; Tagami, H. The safety assessment of fragrance materials. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2003, 37, 218–273.
  66. European-Commission. List of Preservatives Allowed in Cosmetic Products. Available online: https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/cosmetic-ingredient-database-list-of-preservatives-allowed-in-cosmetic products?locale=en (accessed on 25 January 2022).
  67. George, A.B. Fenaroli’s Handbook of Flavor Ingredients; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010.
  68. Atkinson, R. A structure-activity relationship for the estimation of rate constants for the gas-phase reactions of OH radicals with organic compounds. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 1987, 19, 799–828.
  69. Yue, Y.; Wang, L.; Yu, R.; Chen, F.; He, J.; Li, X.; Yu, Y.; Fan, Y. Coordinated and high-level expression of biosynthetic pathway genes is responsible for the production of a major floral scent compound methyl benzoate in Hedychium coronarium. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 650582.
  70. Widhalm, J.R.; Dudareva, N. A familiar ring to it: Biosynthesis of plant benzoic acids. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 83–97.
  71. Bolte, K.; Rensing, S.A.; Maier, U.-G. The evolution of eukaryotic cells from the perspective of peroxisomes: Phylogenetic analyses of peroxisomal beta-oxidation enzymes support mitochondria-first models of eukaryotic cell evolution. Bioessays 2015, 37, 195–203.
  72. Adebesin, F.; Widhalm, J.R.; Lynch, J.H.; McCoy, R.M.; Dudareva, N. A peroxisomal thioesterase plays auxiliary roles in plant β-oxidative benzoic acid metabolism. Plant J. 2018, 93, 905–916.
  73. Boatright, J.; Negre, F.; Chen, X.; Kish, C.M.; Wood, B.; Peel, G.; Orlova, I.; Gang, D.; Rhodes, D.; Dudareva, N. Understanding in vivo benzenoid metabolism in petunia petal tissue. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135, 1993–2011.
  74. Verdonk, J.C.; Ric de Vos, C.H.; Verhoeven, H.A.; Haring, M.A.; van Tunen, A.J.; Schuurink, R.C. Regulation of floral scent production in petunia revealed by targeted metabolomics. Phytochemistry 2003, 62, 997–1008.
  75. Qualley, A.V.; Widhalm, J.R.; Adebesin, F.; Kish, C.M.; Dudareva, N. Completion of the core β-oxidative pathway of benzoic acid biosynthesis in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 16383–16388.
  76. Klempien, A.; Kaminaga, Y.; Qualley, A.; Nagegowda, D.A.; Widhalm, J.R.; Orlova, I.; Shasany, A.K.; Taguchi, G.; Kish, C.M.; Cooper, B.R.; et al. Contribution of CoA ligases to benzenoid biosynthesis in petunia flowers. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 2015–2030.
  77. Kravets-Bekker, A.A.; Ivanova, O.P. Toxicological characteristics of methyl benzoate and potassium benzoate. Fakt. Vnesh. Sredy Ikh Znac. Zdorovya Naseleniya Russ. 1970, 75, 125–129.
  78. Mostafiz, M.M.; Hassan, E.; Shim, J.-K.; Lee, K.-Y. Insecticidal efficacy of three benzoate derivatives against Aphis gossypii and its predator Chrysoperla carnea. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 184, 109653.
  79. Mostafiz, M.M.; Jhan, P.K.; Shim, J.-K.; Lee, K.-Y. Methyl benzoate exhibits insecticidal and repellent activities against Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0208552.
  80. Mostafiz, M.M.; Shim, J.-K.; Hwang, H.-S.; Bunch, H.; Lee, K.-Y. Acaricidal effects of methyl benzoate against Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) on common crop plants. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 2347–2354.
  81. Park, C.G.; Shin, E.; Kim, J. Insecticidal activities of essential oils, Gaultheria fragrantissima and Illicium verum, their components and analogs against Callosobruchus chinensis adults. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2016, 19, 269–273.
  82. Oliveira, M.R.V.; Henneberry, T.J.; Anderson, P. History, History, current status, and collaborative research projects for Bemisia tabaci. Crop Prot. 2001, 20, 709–723.
  83. Stansly, P.A.; Naranjo, S.E. Bemisia: Bionomics and Management of a Global Pest; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2010.
  84. Ebert, T.; Cartwright, B. Biology and ecology of Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera: Aphididae). Southwest. Entomol. 1997, 22, 116–153.
  85. Blackman, R.L.; Eastop, V.F. Aphids on the World’s Crops: An Identification and Information Guide, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2000.
  86. Takafuji, A.; Ozawa, A.; Nemoto, H.; Gotoh, T. Spider mites of Japan: Their biology and control. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2000, 24, 319–335.
  87. Lee, Y.-S.; Song, M.-H.; Ahn, K.-S.; Lee, K.-Y.; Kim, J.-W.; Kim, G.-H. Monitoring of acaricide resistance in two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) populations from rose greenhouses in Korea. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2003, 6, 91–96.
  88. Morrison, L.W.; Porter, S.D.; Daniels, E.; Korzukhin, M.D. Potential global range expansion of the invasive fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Biol. Invasions 2004, 6, 183–191.
  89. Vinson, S.B. Impact of the invasion of the imported fire ant. Insect Sci. 2013, 20, 439–455.
  90. Chen, J.; Rashid, T.; Feng, G.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, A.; Grodowitz, M.J. Insecticidal activity of methyl benzoate analogs against red imported fire ants, Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2019, 112, 691–698.
  91. Larson, N.R.; Nega, M.; Zhang, A.; Feldlaufer, M. Toxicity of methyl benzoate and analogs to adult Aedes aegypti. J. Am. Mosq. Control. Assoc. 2021, 37, 83–86.
  92. Mostafiz, M.M.; Ryu, J.; Akintola, A.A.; Choi, K.S.; Hwang, U.W.; Hassan, E.; Lee, K.-Y. Larvicidal activity of methyl benzoate, a volatile organic compound, against the mosquitoes Aedes Albopictus and Culex Pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 2022, tjab230.
  93. Anukiruthika, T.; Jian, F.; Jayas, D.S. Movement and behavioral response of stored product insects under stored grain environments—A review. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2021, 90, 101752.
  94. Nayak, M.K.; Daglish, G.J.; Phillips, T.W.; Ebert, P.R. Resistance to the fumigant phosphine and its management in insect pests of stored products: A global perspective. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2020, 65, 333–350.
  95. Kim, S.-W.; Kang, J.; Park, I.-K. Fumigant toxicity of apiaceae essential oils and their constituents against Sitophilus oryzae and their acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2013, 16, 443–448.
  96. Zhang, Z.; Yang, T.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Xie, Y. Fumigant toxicity of monoterpenes against fruitfly, Drosophila melanogaster. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 81, 147–151.
  97. Morrison, W.R.; Larson, N.L.; Brabec, D.; Zhang, A. Methyl benzoate as a putative alternative, environmentally friendly fumigant for the control of stored product insects. J. Econ. Entomol. 2019, 112, 2458–2468.
  98. Larson, N.R.; Zhang, A.; Feldlaufer, M.F. Fumigation activities of methyl benzoate and Its derivatives against the common bed bug (Hemiptera: Cimicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 2020, 57, 187–191.
  99. Yang, X.; Liu, Y.-B.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, A. Methyl benzoate fumigation for control of post-harvest pests and its effects on apple quality. J. Appl. Entomol. 2020, 144, 191–200.
  100. Mostafiz, M.M.; Hassan, E.; Acharya, R.; Shim, J.-K.; Lee, K.-Y. Methyl benzoate is superior to other natural fumigants for controlling the Indian meal moth (Plodia interpunctella). Insects 2021, 12, 23.
  101. Thorvilson, H.G.; Phillips, S.A., Jr.; Sorensen, A.A. An innovative thermo-fumigation technique for control of red imported fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Agric. Entomol. 1989, 6, 31–36.
  102. Doggett, S.L.; Miller, D.M.; Lee, C.-Y. Advances in the Biology and Management of Modern Bed Bugs, 1st ed.; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018.
  103. Doggett, S.L.; Dwyer, D.E.; Peñas, P.F.; Russell, R.C. Natural compounds for controlling Drosophila suzukii. a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2012, 25, 164–192.
  104. Dam, D.; Molitor, D.; Beyer, M. Natural compounds for controlling Drosophila suzukii—A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 39, 53.
  105. Kwon, Y.; Kim, S.H.; Ronderos, D.S.; Lee, Y.; Akitake, B.; Woodward, O.M.; Guggino, W.B.; Smith, D.P.; Montell, C. Drosophila TRPA1 channel is required to avoid the naturally occurring insect repellent citronellal. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20, 1672–1678.
  106. Larson, N.R.; Strickland, J.; Zhang, A.; Feldlaufer, M.F. Behavioral activity of methyl benzoate against the common bed bug (Hemiptera: Cimicidae). J. Entomol. Sci. 2020, 55, 344–349.
  107. Zhang, Q.-H.; Schneidmiller, R.G.; Hoover, D.R.; Zhou, G.; Margaryan, A.; Bryant, P. Essential oils as spatial repellents for the brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 2014, 138, 490–499.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Entomology
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Md Munir Mostafiz
,
Errol Hassan
View Times: 1.9K
Revisions: 3 times (View History)
Update Date: 31 Mar 2022
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    ScholarVision Creations
    Feedback