4. Enantiomeric Composition, Antioxidant Capacity and Anticholinesterase Activity of Essential Oil from Leaves of Chirimoya (Annona cherimola Mill.)
The essential oil from
Annona cherimola exhibited a low yield of 2.5 ± 0.2 mL/Kg
[15]. The extraction yield of essential oils is very variable between plant species and depends on different aspects related to the plant such as the part, the age and the time after plant collection and other aspects related to the isolation process such as the pretreatment of the material (drying, grinding, etc.) and the extraction time
[16].
The aroma of the
Annona species is well recognized and has been studied in some species, however, little has been reported about the essential oil composition of
Annona cherimola. In the present study, the main chemical components identified were aliphatic monoterpenes (25.68%) and aliphatic sesquiterpenes (69.40%), which was similar to the information reported by Rabelo et al.
[17]. Furthermore, Rios et al. in 2003
[18] reported monoterpenes (6.09%) and sesquiterpenes (76.56%) as the main type of compounds in the
A. cherimola EO. On the other hand, the same type of volatile compounds were meaningful in fruits of
Annona cherimola (monoterpene 40.3% and sesquiterpene 24.3%)
[19].
The major components (>5%) identified in the
A. cherimola EO were germacrene D (28.77%), bicyclogermacrene (11.12%), (E)-caryophyllene (10.52%), sabinene (9.05%) and β-pinene (7.93%). The results are different to those reported by Elhawary et al. fβ-caryophyllene with 9.50%, germacrene-D with 17.71% an β-elemene with 25.02%
[20], and those reported by Rios et al. reported bicyclogermacrene (18.20%), trans-caryophyllene (11.50%), α-amorphene (7.57%), α-copaene (5.63%) and germacrene D (3.75%)
[18]. In addition, Pino observed that the major compounds were α-thujene (18.7 ppm), α-pinene (23 ppm), terpinen-4-ol (19.8 ppm) and germacrene D (17.6 ppm)
[19]. Despite the differences in their concentrations, the main component that is common in all the studies is germacrene D. It is well known the influence of different cultivation and climatic factors over the chemical composition of the essential oils.
Due to the relevance of aromatic compounds of the
Annona species Ferreira et al. in 2009 compared the essential oil and the volatile compounds of the leaves and fruits of
Annona cherimola. The chemical composition for the EO was different to the volatile compounds in fruits, the main compounds in the leaves essential oil were identified in lower quantities, germacrene-D (0.11% to 0.22%), sabinene (not identified), β-pinene (0.79% to 3.60%), (E)-caryophyllene (0.23% to 0.32%) and bicyclogermacrene (not identified) while the main compounds analyzed by headspace solid phase microextraction were methyl butanoate, butyl butanoate, 3-methylbutyl butanoate, 3-methylbutyl 3-methylbutanoate and 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furfural
[21].
This is the first report of enantioselective GC-MS analysis of
A. cherimola EO, this analysis showed the ocurrence of five pairs of enantiomers and one enantiomerically pure chiral monoterpenoid, β-pinene. The enantiomeric ratio of an essential oil is an important information which could be related with the biological activity, metabolism and organoleptic quality of the enantiomeric pairs
[22]. The enantiomeric excess (e.e %) were (−)-α-pinene (1S,5S) (63.99%), (−)-sabinene (1S,5S) (95.91%), (−)-limonene (4R) (27.50%) and (−)-germacrene D (8S) (95.91%).
Regarding their biological activity, the essential oil of
Annona cherimola showed moderate antibacterial activity against
Campylobacter jejuni (ATCC 33560) and
Klebsiella pneumonia (ATCC 9997), both with MIC at 500 μg/mL and no activity for the other bacteria tested (MIC was higher than 1000 μg/mL). Compared to data reported in the literature, Rios et al. in 2003 reported a significant activity against two Gram-positive bacteria
Staphylococcus aureus (MIC 250 μg/mL) and
Enterococcus faecalis (MIC 500 μg/mL), however, the MIC values for Gram-negative bacteria were higher than 5000 μg/mL
[18]. Elhawary et al. in 2013 reported the MIC of EO
A. cherimola for
Bacillus subtilis (130 μg/mL),
Staphylococcus aureus (285 μg/mL),
Escherichia coli (110 μg/mL),
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (140 μg/mL), and
Candida albicans (152 μg/mL)
[20]. When the antibacterial activity of pure compounds was analyzed
[18] the MIC of trans-caryophyllene, β-pinene, linalool, and other compounds was higher than the value for the essential oil, therefore suggesting that the antibacterial potency could be exerted by a synergistic effect among the constituents above mentioned. The essential oil of
Annona species showed a wide range of biological activity, for
A. vepretorum Costa et al. in 2012 reported a moderate activity (MIC 500 μg/mL) against
Staphylococcus aureus and
Staphylococcus epidermis and a significant activity against
Candida tropicalis (MIC 100 μg/mL)
[23]. Another study, in 2013, Costa et al. observed the antibacterial activity of essential oil of
A. salzmannii and
A. pickelii against
Staphylococcus aureus,
Staphylococcus epidermis and
Candida tropicalis with MIC of 500 μg/mL
[24].
The MIC and minimal microbicidal concentration (MMC) showed that the positive enantiomers of pinene exerted a microbicidal effect against all the fungi and bacteria tested with MIC values ranging from 117 to 4150 µg/mL. However, with concentrations up to 20 mg/mL of the negative enantiomers, no antimicrobial activity was observed
[25]. The MIC values against three Gram-positive (
B. cereus,
E. faecalis and
S. aureus) and four Gram-negative (
E. coli,
K. pneumoniae,
M. catarrhalis and
P. aeruginosa) bacteria were in the ranges of 3 to 27 mg/mL for (+)-limonene and 2 to 27 mg/mL for (−)-limonene. The greatest difference was obtained against
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 12600 where the (+)-limonene showed a MIC of 14 mg/mL and the (−)-limonene a MIC of 4 mg/mL
[26]. Omran et al. found that (−)-limonene had better antifungal activity than (+)-limonene against
Aspergillus niger,
Aspergillus sp.,
Candida albicans and
Penicillium sp.
[27]. It was not possible to find previous studies about the antifungal or antibacterial activity of the (+) and (−) enantiomers of the main compound germacrene D, however, Stranden et al. determined that the two enantiomers of this compound mediate the same kind of information to the receptor neurons of the moth
Helicoverpa armigera, but (−)-germacrene D had approximately 10 times stronger effect than (+)-germacrene D
[28]. The difference in biological activity of the enantiomers is maintained even when they are mixed with other compounds
[26]. The enantiomers of a compound have different biological activities, then, the enantiomeric distribution of the compounds could influence the biological activity for an essential oil.
Regarding their antioxidant effect, the
Annona cherimola essential oil showed an SC
50 of 470 μg/mL for the DPPH assay while the SC
50 was >1000 μg/mL in the ABTS assay. Costa et al. reported as strong the antioxidant activity of EO
A. salzamannii and
A. pickelii measured by a TLC-based DPPH assay, however, the individual components β-pinene and α-pinene did not show antioxidant activity
[24]. Araújo, et al.
[29] and Costa, et al.
[23] reported a weak antioxidant activity for the EO of
A. vepretorum. Another study, Gyesi, et al. in 2019
[30] reported an SC
50 of 244.8 μg/mL from the DPPH assay for the EO of
A. muricata. The differences between the antioxidant activity of EO and pure compounds could correspond to synergistic effects among the components in the essential oil.
The acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of
A. cherimola EO has not been previously reported. Chirimoya EO showed an AChE IC
50 value of 41.51 μg/mL, this inhibitory activity could be considered very strong compared to the related EO of
Piper carpunya (IC
50 of 36.42 μg/mL)
[31]. The inhibition of AChE due to EO is of relevant interest in the treatment of Alzheimer disease since different studies report in vitro and clinical AChE inhibitory activity. Benny and Tomas summarize the neuroprotective effects of EO and its relevance on Alzheimer disease stating that EO could rebuild the antioxidant status of brain which confer neuroprotective effect as in the case of EO of
Coriandrum sativum L.,
Syzygium aromaticum (L.),
Juniperus communis,
Rosmarinis officinalis (L.), and other species. The same activity has been observed for pure compounds such as thymol, linalool, α-terpinene, α-terpineol, carvacrol, (E)-β-caryophyllene, α-pinene, and eugenol
[32].