You're using an outdated browser. Please upgrade to a modern browser for the best experience.
Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic. For video creation, please contact our Academic Video Service.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 + 5078 word(s) 5078 2022-03-07 07:25:18 |
2 format corrected. Meta information modification 5078 2022-03-08 02:14:46 | |
3 typos corrected. Meta information modification 5078 2022-03-09 07:04:22 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Academic Video Service to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Vierucci, F. Breastfeeding and Vitamin D in Preventing Childhood Infections. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/20283 (accessed on 20 July 2025).
Vierucci F. Breastfeeding and Vitamin D in Preventing Childhood Infections. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/20283. Accessed July 20, 2025.
Vierucci, Francesco. "Breastfeeding and Vitamin D in Preventing Childhood Infections" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/20283 (accessed July 20, 2025).
Vierucci, F. (2022, March 07). Breastfeeding and Vitamin D in Preventing Childhood Infections. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/20283
Vierucci, Francesco. "Breastfeeding and Vitamin D in Preventing Childhood Infections." Encyclopedia. Web. 07 March, 2022.
Breastfeeding and Vitamin D in Preventing Childhood Infections
Edit

Human milk is the best food for infants. Breastfeeding has been associated with a reduced risk of viral and bacterial infections. Breast milk contains the perfect amount of nutrients needed to promote infant growth, except for vitamin D. Vitamin D is crucial for calcium metabolism and bone health, and it also has extra-skeletal actions, involving innate and adaptive immunity. As exclusive breastfeeding is a risk factor for vitamin D deficiency, infants should be supplemented with vitamin D at least during the first year. The promotion of breastfeeding and vitamin D supplementation represents an important objective of public health. 

breastfeeding human milk infections vitamin D supplementation COVID-19

1. Breastfeeding and Infections

Breast milk has been described as a complex and highly variable bioactive fluid, with changes in composition depending on the stage of lactation (from colostrum to late lactation), time of day, and maternal nutritional status. Moreover, breast milk is a source of bioactive molecules, bacteria, and immune cells (including macrophages, T cells, stem cells, and lymphocytes) that enhance immune maturation and protect the newborn against infections and inflammation [1]. Indeed, in addition to essential nutrients for early growth and development, human milk contains various immunologic components, such as α-lactalbumin, lactoferrin, lysozyme, and secretory immunoglobulin (Ig) A [2][3]. Colostrum, with its anti-inflammatory and anti-infectious properties, is particularly important during early postnatal life when neonatal adaptive immune system is still immature and ineffective to protect against pathogens [4].
Human milk shows high inter-individual variability, with the most profound changes observed in lipids composition, including long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids which have showed immune-regulatory properties [5]. While several infant-related factors (i.e., birth weight, gestational age, and infant age) are known to affect nutritive and non-nutritive components of breast milk, there is limited or conflicting evidence regarding the possible role of maternal factors (i.e., maternal lifestyle, obstetric history, and medical conditions), except for mother’s diet that significantly influences milk composition. For example, at present there is inconsistent evidence that maternal atopy/allergy may affect breast milk composition of interleukins, growth factors, pro-inflammatory markers, cytokines, and fatty acids [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. However, it has been reported that human milk growth factors and cytokines levels varied between populations for unknown reasons, and breast milk mediator levels declined at different rates postpartum, suggesting specific biological roles for human milk growth factors and cytokines in early postnatal development [17].
WHO recommended that all mothers should be supported to initiate breastfeeding as soon as possible after birth, within the first hour after delivery [18]. The early onset of breastfeeding is a simple, but effective, intervention to significantly improve neonatal morbidity/mortality outcomes, as reported by a systematic review of 18 studies. Particularly, breastfeeding was associated with lower risks of all-cause neonatal mortality (also among low-birth-weight babies), and infection-related neonatal mortality [19]. Breastfeeding help to restore intestinal microbiota in newborns from cesarean section, in which Bifidobacterium is less represented, with consequent reduction risk of contracting respiratory infections and diarrhea in early childhood [20]. The importance of promoting exclusive breastfeeding has been reinforced by a meta-analysis (13 studies; n = 46,499), finding that infection-related mortality risk in the first 5 months of life was higher in predominantly, partially, and non-breastfed infants compared to the exclusively breastfed ones. Moreover, non-breastfed children aged 6–23 months had higher risk of all-cause and infection-related mortality than children who continued breastfeeding [21]. The sudden protective effect of breastfeeding was reported by a retrospective case–control study, enrolling 140 infants aged <1 month. This research showed that exclusive or predominant breastfeeding, as opposed to formula or partial breastfeeding, significantly reduces the risk of neonatal fever-related hospitalization by over two-fold [22].
A combined action of peer-support groups and International Board-Certified Lactation Consultants is essential to promote breastfeeding support strategies, to enhance maternal empowerment, and to increase the knowledge of the protective effect of human milk against infections [23][24]. Particularly, peer-support for breastfeeding is associated with longer duration of exclusivity. Not surprisingly, breastfeeding promotion for low-birth weight babies in critical care is also cost-effective, being associated with lower costs and greater health benefits for mothers and infants [25]. Exclusive breastfeeding has been associated with risk reduction of gastrointestinal infections in late preterms [26]. The implementation of steps 1–9 of the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) was associated with a significant reduction in frequency of mild and severe episodes of diarrhea and respiratory infections in infants younger than 6 months in Democratic Republic of Congo. Promoting BFHI steps 1–9 was also associated with a decreased incidence of both health facility and hospitalizations due to diarrhea and respiratory illness [27]. Recently, it has been estimated that failing to comply with WHO recommendations for breastfeeding entails a healthcare system cost of 118 million US dollars annually for the treatment of diarrhea and pneumonia/respiratory disease in Indonesia [28].
Despite early pacifier use being associated with breastfeeding discontinuation, no significant association was found with respiratory infections, even if constant pacifier use was shown to correlate with a slightly higher risk of coughing and wheezing [29].
Several studies evaluated the possible preventive action of natural breastfeeding against infectious diseases in early childhood, but only few extended follow-ups to second and third infancy [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. Some studies suggested that the protective effect of human milk was maximum during the first 6–12 months of life, while others found that significant reduction in infections risk lasted up to the age of 2 years or even beyond [30][31][32][37][38]. Conversely, in the cohort study of Tarrant, M. et al. (8327 children followed until 8 years of life) breastfeeding status at 3 months was not associated with hospitalization for infectious diseases beyond 6 months of age [33].

1.1. Breastfeeding and Respiratory Tract Infections

Several studies assessed the association between breastfeeding and the risk of upper and lower respiratory tract infections in childhood, most of which found a significant protective role of human milk, despite different applied methodology and various populations enrolled . Predominant breastfeeding for 3–6 months was associated with a significant reduction in contracting respiratory infections during the first 6 months of life [39]. Similarly, a Spanish cohort study (580 children evaluated from birth to 14 months) confirmed that predominant breastfeeding for 4–6 months was associated with a lower risk of wheezing, low respiratory tract infections, and atopic eczema between 7 and 14 months of life [40].
A systematic review of 13 studies in Asian infants confirmed that breastfeeding compared to infant formula was associated with significantly lower rates of respiratory tract infections and diarrhea in the first year of life [41]. A recent nationally representative survey in Ethiopia (1034 infants aged < 6 months) demonstrated that exclusively breastfed subjects had a significant reduction in the frequency of illness with fever in the last 2 weeks compared to non-exclusively breastfed infants. Particularly, exclusively breastfed babies had lower odds ratio (OR) of having an illness with cough (OR 0.38) and diarrhea (OR 0.33) [42]. This finding agreed with the results of a large USA prospective longitudinal study (6861 children with a follow-up of 4 years) that found an inverse significant association between breastfeeding and the risk of respiratory infections with fever (OR 0.82), otitis media (OR 0.76), and infectious gastroenteritis (OR 0.55) at 3–6 months of life. Breastfeeding within any 3-month period was inversely associated with ear infection, gastroenteritis, conjunctivitis, laryngitis, and tracheitis also at 6–18 months. Finally, exclusive breastfeeding duration was weakly inversely associated with the risk of otitis media up to 48 months of age (OR 0.97). Taken together, these results suggest that breastfeeding can provide a mild protection against infections also after the first 6–12 months of life [34].
A Brazilian ecological study showed that prevalence of both exclusive breastfeeding among children under 6 months and breastfeeding among children 9–12 months-old were associated with a lower risk of hospitalization for pneumonia during the first year of life [43]. A meta-analysis confirmed that pneumonia mortality was higher among non-breastfed compared to exclusively breastfed infants aged < 5 months, and among non-breastfed compared to breastfed infants and young children aged 6–23 months [44]. These results reinforced the importance of promoting exclusive breastfeeding during the first 6 months of life and continuing breastfeeding thereafter.
A recent Indonesian retrospective case–control study found that 7–12 months-old non-breastfed infants had a 14 times higher risk of contracting respiratory infections [45]. Another prospective study evaluated 926 Greek children, recording feeding modalities and infectious episodes (acute respiratory tract infections, acute otitis media, gastroenteritis, urinary tract infections, conjunctivitis, candidiasis) during the first year of life. Children exclusively breastfed for 6 months had fewer infectious episodes (particularly respiratory infection and acute otitis media) and hospital admissions than those who were partially or non-breastfed. On the other hand, partial breastfeeding was not related to any protective effect against infections [46].
The French EDEN mother–child study, a cohort study with 8 years of follow-up, did not demonstrate a significant protective effect of breastfeeding on longitudinal patterns of cold/nasopharyngitis, skin rash, or respiratory symptoms. However, ever-breastfed infants had a significant lower risk of diarrhea in early infancy and bronchitis/bronchiolitis throughout infancy compared with never breastfed infants. Only predominant breastfeeding duration was related to frequent events of bronchitis/bronchiolitis and infrequent events of otitis [35].
In a USA prospective longitudinal study (1281 subjects followed until 6 years of life), children breastfed longer than 9 months had lower risk of past-year ear (OR 0.69), throat (OR 0.68), and sinus (OR 0.47) infections compared with those breastfed less than 3 months [38]. A meta-analysis confirmed that breastfeeding protects against acute otitis media until 2 years of life, and exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months was associated with higher risk reduction (43%) [47]. More recently, a Turkish cohort study (411 children evaluated up to 5 years of life) showed that breastfeeding longer than 12 months significantly reduced the risk of acute otitis media and acute gastroenteritis [37].
A large cohort study from UK (4040 children aged 1.00–1.99 years) evaluated the prevalence of frequent colds (>6 episodes), ear infections and croup within the last 12 months, and any episodes of bronchiolitis or pneumonia in relation with breastfeeding duration. This research found limited evidence of a protective effect of breastfeeding against all types of respiratory tract infections during the first 2 years of life, but results suggested that prolonged breastfeeding (>6 months) might protect against bronchiolitis (risk reduction of 28%) [48]. The reasons for this different efficacy of breastfeeding in reducing only bronchiolitis risk are not fully understood; however, another retrospective study (411 infants, age < 1 year) showed that the risk for requiring oxygen therapy to treat respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) bronchiolitis was significantly higher in the artificial-milk-formula-fed group than in the breastfed group [49]. A recent cohort study in Spain (969 infants) showed that any breastfeeding was significantly associated with a lower incidence of bronchiolitis and number of episodes of bronchiolitis in the first year of life, confirming that breastfeeding may represent an effective primary prevention strategy against bronchiolitis [50].
The protective role of breastfeeding against bronchiolitis is particularly relevant during actual coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In 2020, a dramatic reduction in RSV bronchiolitis hospitalization was reported worldwide, coinciding with the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection [51][52][53]. The most accredited hypothesis to explain this uncommon finding was that the strict adoption of non-pharmaceutical interventions to contain SARS-CoV-2 diffusion (including handwashing and social distancing) also reduced the circulation of other infectious agents, such as RSV [52]. Unfortunately, this reduction was only transient, with subsequent rebound during the fall and winter seasons in 2021–2022 [53][54][55]. For example, a recently published French study reported a delayed RSV epidemic in the period usually corresponding to the end of the epidemic season [56].
Breastfeeding and parent-reported hospitalizations, bronchiolitis and otitis events, and antibiotic use were prospectively collected up to 2 years among 9703 young children from the nationwide Etude Longitudinale Française depuis l’Enfance (ELFE) birth cohort. This research showed that the number of bronchiolitis events was not significantly related to ever breastfeeding or to breastfeeding duration, but predominant breastfeeding duration tended to be negatively related to the risk of frequent bronchiolitis events. Similarly, both any and predominant breastfeeding were not related to frequent otitis events. In contrast, any breastfeeding duration < 3 months was associated with higher risks of hospitalizations from gastrointestinal infections or fever, predominant breastfeeding duration < 1 month was associated with higher risk of a single hospital admission, and ever breastfeeding was associated with lower risk of antibiotic use, confirming a lower risk of infectious morbidity related to breastfeeding duration [57]. However, in another cross-sectional study ever breastfeeding compared with exclusive formula feeding was associated with decreased risk (−36%) of a lower versus upper acute viral respiratory tract infection, suggesting that even if exclusive breastfeeding is the recommended feeding method within the first 6 months, partial breastfeeding may also provide some protection against lower respiratory tract infections [58]. A Danish cohort study confirmed that the risk of hospitalization due to any infection in the first year of life decreased with a longer duration of any breastfeeding. Compared with never or partially breastfed group, exclusive breastfed infants for ≥4 months had a significant reduced risk (−55%) of hospital admissions for any infection for the first 24 to 36 months of life. Considering infection types, every extra month of any breastfeeding lowered the risk of lower respiratory tract and other infections (5% for both). On the contrary, no protective associations were found between breastfeeding and infection symptoms registered at home from ages 12 to 36 months [36]. Similarly, another cohort study found that protection against infections conferred by breastfeeding was limited to the first 12 months of life. Indeed, the higher risk of hospitalization was observed in breastfed children ≤ 6 months compared to ≥12 months (relative risk 1.22), but with similar risks for 6 to 11 months versus ≥12 months. Considering the time of weaning, breast-fed children who received complementary foods at 4 to 6 months of age had similar risk for infection as those receiving complementary foods after 6 months [59]. Conversely, a large cohort study (5322 children) highlighted that breastfeeding for ≥ 6 months was significantly associated with a reduced risk of lower respiratory tract infection (OR 0.71) up to 4 years of age [31], suggesting that breastfeeding effect against respiratory infections may persist beyond the first year of life.
Two other studies confirmed that breastfeeding significantly reduced hospitalization risk due to infections. A Japanese longitudinal study (43,367 children) showed that human milk was associated with reduced risk of hospitalization for respiratory infections (but not diarrhea) during second infancy (between 30 and 42 months of life) [32], and a cohort study in Honk Kong (8327 subjects) found that breastfeeding for >3 months was associated with a lower risk of hospital admission in the first 6 months of life for respiratory infections, gastrointestinal infections, or any infection [33].
Another large cohort study (15,809 infants from the UK Millennium Cohort Study) demonstrated that exclusive breastfeeding was associated with chest infections and diarrhea, but not with ear infections. Particularly, infants exclusively breastfed for <4 months had an increased risk of respiratory infection (risk ratios 1.24–1.28) and diarrhea (risk ratios 1.42–1.66) compared with the pre-2001 WHO policy (starting solids, but not formula, before 6 months, and continuing breastfeeding at 6 months). Moreover, this research found an excess risk of chest infections and diarrhea also among infants exclusively breastfed for 4–6 months, but who stopped breastfeeding by 6 months, highlighting the importance of continuing breastfeeding beyond 6 months of life [60].
Apparently contradictory results come from an Italian case–control study (496 infants aged < 6 months) reporting that exclusive breastfeeding at infant symptom onset was associated with a higher risk of viral respiratory infection (OR 3.7) confirmed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Breastfeeding may represent a proxy for closer contacts of the infant with the mother and, possibly, with other household members. However, in this research a longer breastfeeding period conferred a mild protection against viral respiratory infections (OR 0.98), suggesting that protective role of breastfeeding increases with duration [61]. This research also reinforced the importance of adopting Center for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations for the prevention of viral respiratory infections transmission to infants (symptomatic mothers should thoroughly wash their hands with soap and water before touching the infant and cover their nose and mouth with a tissue when sneezing or coughing in close contact with the infant) [62].
A protective effect of breastfeeding has been reported also against enterovirus infections responsible for hand, foot, and mouth disease. Interestingly, prolonged exclusive breastfeeding reduced the risk of developing fever, possibly due to some anti-inflammatory components of human milk that can reduce the production of pyrogenic substances. Moreover, breastfeeding can reduce infant discomfort conferring emotional support from the intimate contact with mother [30]. Finally, a Brazilian case–control study (267 infants < 6 months) confirmed that children exclusively breastfed and with mothers vaccinated against pertussis during pregnancy were 5 times less likely to develop a pertussis-like illness (OR 0.21) [49].

1.2. Breastfeeding and Gastrointestinal Infections

Some studies assessed the implication of natural breastfeeding on gastrointestinal infections in infancy. Once again, human milk seems protective against diarrheal diseases development and severity as breastfeeding was significantly associated with reduced incidence/risk of acute gastroenteritis [27][20][39][34][40][60][35][37][42][41]. A meta-analysis of 18 studies found that not breastfeeding was associated with an increased risk of diarrhea mortality in comparison to exclusive breastfeeding among infants aged <5 months and to any breastfeeding among children aged 6–23 months (relative risk 10.52 and 2.18, respectively) [63]. This meta-analysis reinforced the importance of adopting WHO recommendation for exclusive breastfeeding during the first 6 months of life as a key child survival intervention, especially in developing countries.
Few studies evaluated the association between breastfeeding and hospitalization risk, with conflicting results. Tarrant, M. et al. found that breastfeeding for at least 3 months was associated with a lower risk of hospital admission in the first 6 months of life for gastrointestinal infections [33], while Davisse-Paturet, C. et al. showed that a shorter duration of breastfeeding (any breastfeeding for less than 3 months) was associated with higher risks of hospitalizations from gastrointestinal infections [57]. Differently, in a Japanese longitudinal study breastfeeding was not associated with reduced risk of hospitalization for diarrhea [32]. Interestingly, a Japanese cohort study (31,578 term and late-preterm infants; follow-up 18 months of life) found that exclusively breastfed late preterm infants did not show an increased risk of hospitalization for gastrointestinal infection, suggesting that exclusive breastfeeding probably mitigates the adverse effect of late preterm birth on gastrointestinal infections [26].
As for respiratory tract infections, breastfeeding duration seems to influence the risk of contracting gastrointestinal diseases. Raheem, R.A. et al. found that infants who are predominantly breastfed for longer duration have lower risks of having diarrhea [39]. In comparison with never breastfeeding, predominant breastfeeding for 4–6 months was associated with lower risk of gastroenteritis in the first 6 months of life (OR 0.34); this finding may at least in part be explained by exposure to higher doses of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids received from colostrum and human milk [40]. Finally, if considering specifically Rotavirus infection, a meta-analysis of six studies (3466 children) found that exclusive breastfeeding significantly reduces the risk of Rotavirus infection (OR 0.62) among children below 2 years of age [64].

1.3. Breastfeeding and Immunodeficiency Virus

Breastfeeding promotion for infants born from immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected mothers is a still highly debated topic, with important repercussions for public health strategies [65]. WHO in 2010 first recommended antiretroviral therapy (ART) to prevent HIV postnatal transmission through breastfeeding [66]. Subsequently, lifelong ART has been recommended for everyone from the time when any adult (including pregnant and breastfeeding women) or child is first diagnosed with HIV infection [67]. However, national guidelines for high-income countries generally discouraged women living with HIV from breastfeeding their infants. In 2013 the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended that pregnant women need to be aware of the potential risk of HIV transmission to infants from breastfeeding. In the United States, HIV-infected women should be counseled not to breastfeed, regardless of ART use or viral load. Moreover, HIV seronegative women who are at high risk of seroconversion should repeat HIV testing and receive education about the risk of HIV transmission through human milk and should be provided an individualized recommendation concerning the appropriateness of breastfeeding [68]. Similarly, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended that HIV-infected mothers completely avoid breastfeeding their infants, regardless of ART and maternal viral load, providing feeding guidance and emotional support for mothers living with HIV that experienced social or cultural pressure to breastfeed. Indeed, CDC pointed out that keeping an undetectable viral load significantly reduces, but does not completely eliminate, the risk of transmitting HIV through breastfeeding [69].
On the contrary, in 2016 WHO recommended that HIV-infected mothers (and whose infants are HIV uninfected or of unknown HIV status) should exclusively breastfeed for the first six months of life. Mothers living with HIV should breastfeed for at least 12 months and may continue breastfeeding for up to 24 months or longer (similar to the general population) while being supported for ART adherence. WHO highlighted that this guideline is intended mainly for low- and middle-income countries with high HIV prevalence and settings in which diarrhea, pneumonia, and undernutrition are common causes of infant and child mortality [70]. Despite this clear division between recommendations for high- and low-income countries, breastfeeding from mothers living with HIV has been recommended also in high-resource settings [71][72]. Moreover, a recent systematic review reiterated that exclusive breastfeeding had a positive outcome on growth and development of all infants irrespective of HIV status [73]. Therefore, in absence of definitive and universally shared recommendations, health care professionals should provide adequate counseling and support to women living with HIV who desire to breastfeed, discussing benefit-risk ratio and supervising adherence to ART [74].

2. Vitamin D Supplementation in Childhood

The term “vitamin D” is commonly used to indicate two different forms which are found in nature: vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) from animal sources and vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) from plants. Humans can produce vitamin D3 in their skin in response to sunlight exposure, while vitamin D2 and D3 may be obtained from dietary sources. Vitamin D is usually called the sunshine vitamin because most of the vitamin D we synthesize (90%) derives from skin exposure to solar ultraviolet B radiation, while the contribution of dietary intakes, with the exclusion of artificially fortified foods, may be considered negligible [75][76].
Vitamin D supplementation is the simplest and safest way to prevent nutritional rickets and, more generally, vitamin D deficiency at every age of life. Besides this historically well-known indication, considering the growing interest on skeletal and extra-skeletal actions of vitamin D, supplementation has been proposed to promote both bone and general health of children and adults, even if actual evidence from human studies suggest that supplementation of vitamin D-replete individuals does not provide demonstrable health benefits [77].
Vitamin D supplementation is essential to ensure an adequate vitamin D status during the first year of life, because newborns and infants should be poorly exposed to solar light and vitamin D content of breast and formula milk are both insufficient. Even if breast milk is the best food to satisfy children’s nutritional needs, it contains a poor amount of vitamin D (<50 IU/L) [78]. On the other hand, vitamin D intake of non-breastfed infants depends on vitamin D formula content (about 400 IU/L) and daily formula intake. Considering water requirements, formula-fed infants may receive 400 IU/day of vitamin D only when they weigh 5–6 Kg, so only some months after birth and near weaning, when daily milk consumption inevitably reduces [79]. Finally, as fetal vitamin D stores depend exclusively on maternal vitamin D status, newborns from mothers not receiving vitamin D supplementation and with poor sun exposure are at increased risk of vitamin D deficiency [80]. For all these reasons, first an expert position statement [79], followed by international [81] and national consensus [82] recommended vitamin D supplementation with 400 IU/day for all infants from birth to 12 months of life, independently of their mode of feeding. A recent meta-analysis (19 studies with 2837 mother–infant pairs) confirmed that vitamin D supplementation with 400 IU/day was effective to prevent vitamin D deficiency in high-risk term breastfed infants [83]. Another meta-analysis (28 trials with an overall sample size of 5908 participants of maternal–infant dyads) found that maternal postpartum or infant intermittent vitamin D supplementation may represent plausible substitutes for daily infant vitamin D supplementation in breastfed infants, but actual evidence remains too weak to support a policy update [84] and daily infant vitamin D supplementation remained mandatory during first and second infancy.
As nutritional rickets may develop during the entire pediatric age and an inadequate vitamin D status may negatively affect bone health, beyond 1 year of age vitamin D supplementation with at least 600 IU/day is recommended in children and adolescents with risk factors for deficiency [81]. A recent review confirmed that universal vitamin D supplementation until 12 months of age is strongly recommended, while beyond 1 year of life supplementation is recommended only in at-risk children. However, the authors highlighted that this age cut off is essentially arbitrary and not based on robust evidence, therefore the length of supplementation should always be individualized [85]. Risk factors for hypovitaminosis D identified from the Italian Pediatric Society are resumed in Table 1, while Table 2 summarizes the indications for vitamin D supplementation during childhood [82].
Table 1. Risk factors for vitamin D deficiency in childhood [82].
First Year of Life 1–18 Years
Non-Caucasian ethnicity with dark skin pigmentation
Inadequate diets (i.e., vegan diet)
Chronic kidney disease
Hepatic failure and/or cholestasis
Malabsorption syndromes (i.e., cystic fibrosis, inflammatory bowel diseases, celiac disease at diagnosis)
Chronic therapies: anticonvulsants, systemic glucocorticoids, antiretroviral therapy, systemic antifungals (i.e., ketoconazole)
Infants born from mothers with multiple risk factors for vitamin D deficiency, particularly in absence of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy Reduced sunlight exposure (due to lifestyle factors, chronic illness or hospitalization, complex disability, institutionalization, covering clothing for religious or cultural reasons) and/or constant use of sunscreens
  International adoption
  Obesity
Table 2. Key points of vitamin D supplementation in childhood [82].
First Year of Life 1–18 Years
Vitamin D supplementation is recommended in all newborns, independently of the type of feeding. Vitamin D supplementation is recommended in children and adolescents with risk factors for vitamin D deficiency.
Vitamin D supplementation should be started within the first days of life and continued throughout the first year. Vitamin D supplementation is recommended from the end of fall to the beginning of spring (November–April) in children and adolescents with reduced sun exposure during summer. Continuous vitamin D supplementation is recommended in cases of permanent risk factors for vitamin D deficiency.
Infants born at term without risk factors for vitamin D deficiency should receive 400 IU/day of vitamin D. In the presence of risk factors for vitamin D deficiency up to 1000 IU/day of vitamin D can be given. At-risk children should receive daily vitamin D supplementation ranging from 600 IU/day (i.e., in presence of reduced sun exposure) up to 1000 IU/day (i.e., in presence of multiple risk factors for vitamin D deficiency).
Daily administration of vitamin D is recommended. In cases of poor compliance, supplementation with intermittent dosing (weekly or monthly doses for a cumulative monthly dose of 18,000–30,000 IU of vitamin D) can be considered, starting from children aged 5–6 years and particularly during adolescence.
Individuals on anticonvulsants, oral corticosteroids, antimycotics and antiretroviral drugs should receive at least 2–3 times more vitamin D than the daily requirement recommended for age.
Vitamin D metabolites and their analogs (calcifediol, alfacalcidol, calcitriol, and dihydrotachysterol) are not recommended for the routine vitamin D supplementation.
25(OH)D testing in children and adolescents is not recommended. Evaluation of serum 25(OH)D levels can be considered in presence of multiple risk factors for vitamin D deficiency. Vitamin D status should be monitored at least yearly in subjects that require continuous supplementation.

Vitamin D and Infections

Vitamin D, due to its complex immunoregulatory properties, modulates innate and adaptive immunity and inflammatory response. A detailed discussion of the immunological effects of vitamin D is beyond the scope of this research and can be found elsewhere [86][87][88]. Briefly, vitamin D stimulates innate immunity by increasing the production of cathelicidin and β-defensins, as well as enhancing chemotaxis and phagocytosis. At the same time, vitamin D reduces the synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α) and Th1 and Th17 cells response, favoring Th2 cells activity with consequent anti-inflammatory effect due to increased production of IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13 [87].
Several observational studies found a relationship between vitamin D status and incidence or severity of upper- and lower-respiratory tract infections in children, both in developing and in westernized countries [89][90][91]. However, a possible association between severe vitamin D deficiency and respiratory tract infections was historically hypothesized due to the identification of a significant increased risk of pneumonia and respiratory complications in rachitic children, a condition known as rachitic lung [92][93][94]. A significant association between 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels and other pediatric infections has also been found, including urinary tract infections [95], otitis media [96], acute diarrhea [97], rotavirus infection [98], malaria [99], leishmaniosis [100], hepatitis C [101], and sepsis [102][103][104]. Moreover, some studies investigated a possible relationship between vitamin D deficiency and tuberculosis infection in children, with discordant results [105][106]. Even if vitamin D supplementation does not seem to have any beneficial effect in the treatment of tuberculosis in children and adults [107], an individual-participant data meta-analysis showed that vitamin D predicts tuberculosis disease risk in a dose-dependent manner and tuberculosis risk was highest among HIV-positive individuals with severe vitamin D deficiency [108].
Despite a growing number of studies assessing the relationship between vitamin D status and infections risk, it is still unclear whether vitamin D deficiency should be considered a consequence of the infection or if it plays a causative role in increasing infections risk. More robust evidence was expected from supplementation studies, but several variables may confound the results and complicate the comparison between different studies (i.e., differences in population enrolled, vitamin D supplementation dosage and regimen, length of follow-up, and percentage of enrolled individuals with severe vitamin D deficiency).
Most of meta-analyses confirmed a significant protective role of vitamin D supplementation against respiratory infections; particularly, major benefits were observed in children and adolescents, asthmatic subjects, individuals with severe vitamin D deficiency, and those receiving a daily dosing regimen (400–1000 IU/day) for a duration of 12 months or less.
A systematic review of observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on extra-skeletal actions of vitamin D confirmed that vitamin D supplementation plays a significant role in the primary prevention of acute respiratory infections [109]. Preventive efficacy of vitamin D supplementation was particularly evident in subjects with severe deficiency [25(OH)D < 10 ng/mL], while vitamin D administration was not effective as adjunctive treatment of acute respiratory infections [110][111][109]. An expert consensus statement from the World Association of Infectious Diseases and Immunological Disorders confirmed that vitamin D could play a role in children with recurrent respiratory infections. However, future large and methodologically adequate studies in predisposed children are needed to clearly identify the lowest serum vitamin D level associated with a significant increased risk of respiratory infections, in adjunct with the most effective dosage, regimen and duration of vitamin D supplementation [112]. Similarly, an Italian inter-society consensus on the prevention of recurrent respiratory infections found that reduced vitamin D levels are associated with an increased incidence of viral respiratory infections in the first years of life [113]. Even if the evidence was too low to universally recommend vitamin D supplementation only for the prevention of respiratory infections, populations with low socioeconomic status and severe vitamin D deficiency, and children with recurrent acute otitis may benefit from vitamin D supplementation for such purpose. Finally, a recently published review of meta-analyses and RCTs confirmed that individuals most likely to benefit from supplementation are those with baseline vitamin D deficiency or with selected high-risk conditions [114].

References

  1. Camacho-Morales, A.; Caba, M.; García-Juárez, M.; Caba-Flores, M.D.; Viveros-Contreras, R.; Martínez-Valenzuela, C. Breastfeeding contributes to physiological immune programming in the newborn. Front. Pediatr. 2021, 9, 744104.
  2. Ballard, O.; Morrow, A.L. Human milk composition: Nutrients and bioactive factors. Pediatr. Clin. N. Am. 2013, 60, 49–74.
  3. Yi, D.Y.; Kim, S.Y. Human breast milk composition and function in human health: From nutritional components to microbiome and microRNAs. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3094.
  4. Yu, J.C.; Khodadadi, H.; Malik, A.; Davidson, B.; Salles, É.D.S.L.; Bhatia, J.; Hale, V.L.; Baban, B. Innate immunity of neonates and infants. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1759.
  5. Van Dael, P. Role of n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in human nutrition and health: Review of recent studies and recommendations. Nutr. Res. Pract. 2021, 15, 137–159.
  6. Samuel, T.M.; Zhou, Q.; Giuffrida, F.; Munblit, D.; Verhasselt, V.; Thakkar, S.K. Nutritional and non-nutritional composition of human milk is modulated by maternal, infant, and methodological factors. Front. Nutr. 2020, 7, 576133.
  7. Siziba, L.P.; Lorenz, L.; Stahl, B.; Mank, M.; Marosvölgyi, T.; Decsi, T.; Rothenbacher, D.; Genuneit, J. Human milk fatty acid composition of allergic and non-allergic mothers: The Ulm SPATZ Health Study. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1740.
  8. Sidor, K.; Jarmołowska, B.; Kaczmarski, M.; Kostyra, E.; Iwan, M.; Kostyra, H. Content of beta-casomorphins in milk of women with a history of allergy. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2008, 19, 587–591.
  9. Prokesová, L.; Lodinová-Zádníková, R.; Zizka, J.; Kocourková, I.; Novotná, O.; Petrásková, P.; Sterzl, I. Cytokine levels in healthy and allergic mothers and their children during the first year of life. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2006, 17, 175–183.
  10. Marek, A.; Zagierski, M.; Liberek, A.; Aleksandrowicz, E.; Korzon, M.; Krzykowski, G.; Kamińska, B.; Szlagatys-Sidorkiewicz, A. TGF-beta(1), IL-10 and IL-4 in colostrum of allergic and nonallergic mothers. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2009, 56, 411–414.
  11. Rigotti, E.; Piacentini, G.L.; Ress, M.; Pigozzi, R.; Boner, A.L.; Peroni, D.G. Transforming growth factor-beta and interleukin-10 in breast milk and development of atopic diseases in infants. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2006, 36, 614–618.
  12. Laiho, K.; Lampi, A.M.; Hamalainen, M.; Moilanen, E.; Piironen, V.; Arvola, T.; Syrjanen, S.; Isolauri, E. Breast milk fatty acids, eicosanoids, and cytokines in mothers with and without allergic disease. Pediatr. Res. 2003, 53, 642–647.
  13. Hettinga, K.A.; Reina, F.M.; Boeren, S.; Zhang, L.; Koppelman, G.H.; Postma, D.S.; Vervoort, J.J.; Wijga, A.H. Difference in the breast milk proteome between allergic and non-allergic mothers. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0122234.
  14. Snijders, B.E.; Damoiseaux, J.G.; Penders, J.; Kummeling, I.; Stelma, F.F.; van Ree, R.; van den Brandt, P.A.; Thijs, C. Cytokines and soluble CD14 in breast milk in relation with atopic manifestations in mother and infant (KOALA Study). Clin. Exp. Allergy 2006, 36, 1609–1615.
  15. Lauritzen, L.; Halkjaer, L.B.; Mikkelsen, T.B.; Olsen, S.F.; Michaelsen, K.F.; Loland, L.; Bisgaard, H. Fatty acid composition of human milk in atopic Danish mothers. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006, 84, 190–196.
  16. Johansson, S.; Wold, A.E.; Sandberg, A.S. Low breast milk levels of long-chain n-3 fatty acids in allergic women, despite frequent fish intake. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2011, 41, 505–515.
  17. Munblit, D.; Treneva, M.; Peroni, D.G.; Colicino, S.; Chow, L.; Dissanayeke, S.; Abrol, P.; Sheth, S.; Pampura, A.; Boner, A.L.; et al. Colostrum and mature human milk of women from London, Moscow, and Verona: Determinants of immune composition. Nutrients 2016, 8, 695.
  18. World Health Organization. Breastfeeding. Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/breastfeeding#tab=tab_2 (accessed on 25 February 2022).
  19. Debes, A.K.; Kohli, A.; Walker, N.; Edmond, K.; Mullany, L.C. Time to initiation of breastfeeding and neonatal mortality and morbidity: A systematic review. BMC Public. Health. 2013, 13 (Suppl. 3), S19.
  20. Guo, C.; Zhou, Q.; Li, M.; Zhou, L.; Xu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Li, D.; Wang, Y.; Dai, W.; Li, S.; et al. Breastfeeding restored the gut microbiota in caesarean section infants and lowered the infection risk in early life. BMC Pediatr. 2020, 20, 532.
  21. Sankar, M.J.; Sinha, B.; Chowdhury, R.; Bhandari, N.; Taneja, S.; Martines, J.; Bahl, R. Optimal breastfeeding practices and infant and child mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2015, 104, 3–13.
  22. Netzer-Tomkins, H.; Rubin, L.; Ephros, M. Breastfeeding is associated with decreased hospitalization for neonatal fever. Breastfeed. Med. 2016, 11, 218–221.
  23. Rodríguez-Gallego, I.; Leon-Larios, F.; Corrales-Gutierrez, I.; González-Sanz, J.D. Impact and effectiveness of group strategies for supporting breastfeeding after birth: A systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2550.
  24. Buckland, C.; Hector, D.; Kolt, G.S.; Fahey, P.; Arora, A. Interventions to promote exclusive breastfeeding among young mothers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. Breastfeed. J. 2020, 15, 102.
  25. Camacho, E.M.; Hussain, H. Cost-effectiveness evidence for strategies to promote or support breastfeeding: A systematic search and narrative literature review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020, 20, 757.
  26. Nakamura, K.; Matsumoto, N.; Nakamura, M.; Takeuchi, A.; Kageyama, M.; Yorifuji, T. Exclusively breastfeeding modifies the adverse association of late preterm birth and gastrointestinal infection: A nationwide birth cohort study. Breastfeed. Med. 2020, 15, 509–515.
  27. Zivich, P.; Lapika, B.; Behets, F.; Yotebieng, M. Implementation of steps 1–9 to successful breastfeeding reduces the frequency of mild and severe episodes of diarrhea and respiratory tract infection among 0–6 month infants in Democratic Republic of Congo. Matern. Child Health J. 2018, 22, 762–771.
  28. Siregar, A.Y.M.; Pitriyan, P.; Walters, D. The annual cost of not breastfeeding in Indonesia: The economic burden of treating diarrhea and respiratory disease among children (<24mo) due to not breastfeeding according to recommendation. Int. Breastfeed. J. 2018, 13, 10.
  29. Siti, Z.M.; Joanita, S.; Khairun Nisa, J.; Balkish, M.N.; Tahir, A. Pacifier use and its association with breastfeeding and acute respiratory infection (ARI) in children below 2 years old. Med. J. Malays. 2013, 68, 125–128.
  30. Zhu, Q.; Li, Y.; Li, N.; Han, Q.; Liu, Z.; Li, Z.; Qiu, J.; Zhang, G.; Li, F.; Tian, N. Prolonged exclusive breastfeeding, autumn birth and increased gestational age are associated with lower risk of fever in children with hand, foot, and mouth disease. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2012, 31, 2197–2202.
  31. Tromp, I.; Kiefte-de Jong, J.; Raat, H.; Jaddoe, V.; Franco, O.; Hofman, A.; de Jongste, J.; Moll, H. Breastfeeding and the risk of respiratory tract infections after infancy: The Generation R study. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0172763.
  32. Yamakawa, M.; Yorifuji, T.; Kato, T.; Inoue, S.; Tokinobu, A.; Tsuda, T.; Doi, H. Long-term effects of breastfeeding on children’s hospitalization for respiratory tract infections and diarrhea in early childhood in Japan. Matern. Child Health J. 2015, 19, 1956–1965.
  33. Tarrant, M.; Kwok, M.K.; Lam, T.H.; Leung, G.M.; Schooling, C.M. Breast-feeding and childhood hospitalizations for infections. Epidemiology 2010, 21, 847–854.
  34. Frank, N.M.; Lynch, K.F.; Uusitalo, U.; Yang, J.; Lönnrot, M.; Virtanen, S.M.; Hyöty, H.; Norris, J.M.; TEDDY Study Group. The relationship between breastfeeding and reported respiratory and gastrointestinal infection rates in young children. BMC Pediatr. 2019, 19, 339.
  35. Davisse-Paturet, C.; Adel-Patient, K.; Forhan, A.; Lioret, S.; Annesi-Maesano, I.; Heude, B.; Charles, M.A.; de Lauzon-Guillain, B. Breastfeeding initiation or duration and longitudinal patterns of infections up to 2 years and skin rash and respiratory symptoms up to 8 years in the EDEN mother-child cohort. Matern. Child Nutr. 2020, 16, e12935.
  36. Christensen, N.; Bruun, S.; Søndergaard, J.; Christesen, H.T.; Fisker, N.; Zachariassen, G.; Sangild, P.T.; Husby, S. Breastfeeding and infections in early childhood: A cohort study. Pediatrics 2020, 146, e20191892.
  37. Ardiç, C.; Yavuz, E. Effect of breastfeeding on common pediatric infections: A 5-year prospective cohort study. Arch. Argent. Pediatr. 2018, 116, 126–132.
  38. Li, R.; Dee, D.; Li, C.M.; Hoffman, H.J.; Grummer-Strawn, L.M. Breastfeeding and risk of infections at 6 years. Pediatrics 2014, 134 (Suppl. 1), S13–S20.
  39. Raheem, R.A.; Binns, C.W.; Chih, H.J. Protective effects of breastfeeding against acute respiratory tract infections and diarrhoea: Findings of a cohort study. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2017, 53, 271–276.
  40. Morales, E.; García-Esteban, R.; Guxens, M.; Guerra, S.; Mendez, M.; Moltó-Puigmartí, C.; Lopez-Sabater, M.C.; Sunyer, J. Effects of prolonged breastfeeding and colostrum fatty acids on allergic manifestations and infections in infancy. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2012, 42, 918–928.
  41. Lee, M.K.; Binns, C. Breastfeeding and the risk of infant illness in Asia: A review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 17, 186.
  42. Mulatu, T.; Yimer, N.B.; Alemnew, B.; Linger, M.; Liben, M.L. Exclusive breastfeeding lowers the odds of childhood diarrhea and other medical conditions: Evidence from the 2016 Ethiopian demographic and health survey. Ital. J. Pediatr. 2021, 47, 166.
  43. Boccolini, C.S.; Carvalho, M.L.; Oliveira, M.I.; Boccolini Pde, M. Breastfeeding can prevent hospitalization for pneumonia among children under 1 year old. J. Pediatr. (Rio J.) 2011, 87, 399–404.
  44. Lamberti, L.M.; Zakarija-Grković, I.; Fischer Walker, C.L.; Theodoratou, E.; Nair, H.; Campbell, H.; Black, R.E. Breastfeeding for reducing the risk of pneumonia morbidity and mortality in children under two: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 2013, 13 (Suppl. 3), S18.
  45. Jansen, S.; Wasityastuti, W.; Astarini, F.D.; Hartini, S. Mothers’ knowledge of breastfeeding and infant feeding types affect acute respiratory infections. J. Prev. Med. Hyg. 2020, 61, E401–E408.
  46. Ladomenou, F.; Moschandreas, J.; Kafatos, A.; Tselentis, Y.; Galanakis, E. Protective effect of exclusive breastfeeding against infections during infancy: A prospective study. Arch. Dis. Child. 2010, 95, 1004–1008.
  47. Bowatte, G.; Tham, R.; Allen, K.J.; Tan, D.J.; Lau, M.; Dai, X.; Lodge, C.J. Breastfeeding and childhood acute otitis media: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2015, 104, 85–95.
  48. Wang, J.; Ramette, A.; Jurca, M.; Goutaki, M.; Beardsmore, C.S.; Kuehni, C.E. Breastfeeding and respiratory tract infections during the first 2 years of life. ERJ Open Res. 2017, 3, 00143–2016.
  49. Jang, M.J.; Kim, Y.J.; Hong, S.; Na, J.; Hwang, J.H.; Shin, S.M.; Ahn, Y.M. Positive association of breastfeeding on respiratory syncytial virus infection in hospitalized infants: A multicenter retrospective study. Clin. Exp. Pediatr. 2020, 63, 135–140.
  50. Gómez-Acebo, I.; Lechosa-Muñiz, C.; Paz-Zulueta, M.; Sotos, T.D.; Alonso-Molero, J.; Llorca, J.; Cabero-Perez, M.J. Feeding in the first six months of life is associated with the probability of having bronchiolitis: A cohort study in Spain. Int. Breastfeed. J. 2021, 16, 82.
  51. Torres-Fernandez, D.; Casellas, A.; Mellado, M.J.; Calvo, C.; Bassat, Q. Acute bronchiolitis and respiratory syncytial virus seasonal transmission during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain: A national perspective from the pediatric Spanish Society (AEP). J. Clin. Virol. 2021, 145, 105027.
  52. Risso, F.M.; Cozzi, G.; Volonnino, M.; Cossovel, F.; Ullmann, N.; Ciofi Degli Atti, M.L.; Amaddeo, A.; Ghirardo, S.; Cutrera, R.; Raponi, M. Social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a marked decrease in hospitalisations for bronchiolitis. Acta Paediatr. 2022, 111, 163–164.
  53. Van Brusselen, D.; De Troeyer, K.; Ter Haar, E.; Vander Auwera, A.; Poschet, K.; Van Nuijs, S.; Bael, A.; Stobbelaar, K.; Verhulst, S.; Van Herendael, B.; et al. Bronchiolitis in COVID-19 times: A nearly absent disease? Eur. J. Pediatr. 2021, 180, 1969–1973.
  54. Hussain, F.; Kotecha, S.; Edwards, M.O. RSV bronchiolitis season 2021 has arrived, so be prepared! Arch. Dis. Child. 2021, 106, e51.
  55. Ferrero, F.; Ossorio, M.F.; Rial, M.J. The return of RSV. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2022, 57, 770–771.
  56. Delestrain, C.; Danis, K.; Hau, I.; Behillil, S.; Billard, M.N.; Krajten, L.; Cohen, R.; Bont, L.; Epaud, R. Impact of COVID-19 social distancing on viral infection in France: A delayed outbreak of RSV. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2021, 56, 3669–3673.
  57. Davisse-Paturet, C.; Adel-Patient, K.; Divaret-Chauveau, A.; Pierson, J.; Lioret, S.; Cheminat, M.; Dufourg, M.N.; Charles, M.A.; de Lauzon-Guillain, B. Breastfeeding status and duration and infections, hospitalizations for infections, and antibiotic use in the first two years of life in the ELFE cohort. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1607.
  58. Vereen, S.; Gebretsadik, T.; Hartert, T.V.; Minton, P.; Woodward, K.; Liu, Z.; Carroll, K.N. Association between breast-feeding and severity of acute viral respiratory tract infection. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2014, 33, 986–988.
  59. Størdal, K.; Lundeby, K.M.; Brantsæter, A.L.; Haugen, M.; Nakstad, B.; Lund-Blix, N.A.; Stene, L.C. Breast-feeding and infant hospitalization for infections: Large cohort and sibling analysis. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2017, 65, 225–231.
  60. Quigley, M.A.; Carson, C.; Sacker, A.; Kelly, Y. Exclusive breastfeeding duration and infant infection. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 70, 1420–1427.
  61. Pandolfi, E.; Gesualdo, F.; Rizzo, C.; Carloni, E.; Villani, A.; Concato, C.; Linardos, G.; Russo, L.; Ferretti, B.; Campagna, I.; et al. Breastfeeding and respiratory infections in the first 6 months of life: A case control study. Front. Pediatr. 2019, 7, 152.
  62. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Protect against Flu: Caregivers of Infants and Young Children. Page Last Reviewed: 26 August 2021. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/highrisk/infantcare.htm (accessed on 5 February 2022).
  63. Lamberti, L.M.; Fischer Walker, C.L.; Noiman, A.; Victora, C.; Black, R.E. Breastfeeding and the risk for diarrhea morbidity and mortality. BMC Public Health 2011, 11 (Suppl. 3), S15.
  64. Krawczyk, A.; Lewis, M.G.; Venkatesh, B.T.; Nair, S.N. Effect of exclusive breastfeeding on rotavirus infection among children. Indian J. Pediatr. 2016, 83, 220–225.
  65. Anderson, P.O. Breastfeeding by women with HIV infection. Breastfeed. Med. 2020, 15, 485–487.
  66. World Health Organization. Antiretroviral Drugs for Treating Pregnant Women and Preventing HIV Infection in Infants: Recommendations for a Public Health Approach; 2010 revision; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010; Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/75236/9789241599818_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 20 February 2022).
  67. World Health Organization. Consolidated Guidelines on the Use of Antiretroviral Drugs for Treating and Preventing HIV Infection: Recommendations for a Public Health Approach, 2nd ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016; Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/208825/9789241549684_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 20 February 2022).
  68. Committee on Pediatric Aids. Infant feeding and transmission of human immunodeficiency virus in the United States. Pediatrics 2013, 131, 391–396.
  69. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV and Pregnant Women, Infants, and Children. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/gender/pregnantwomen/index.html (accessed on 20 February 2022).
  70. World Health Organization. Guideline: Updates on HIV and Infant Feeding: The Duration of Breastfeeding, and Support from Health Services to Improve Feeding Practices among Mothers Living with HIV; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK379872/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK379872.pdf (accessed on 20 February 2022).
  71. Tuthill, E.L.; Tomori, C.; Van Natta, M.; Coleman, J.S. “In the United States, we say, ‘No breastfeeding,’ but that is no longer realistic”: Provider perspectives towards infant feeding among women living with HIV in the United States. J. Int. AIDS Soc. 2019, 22, e25224.
  72. Haberl, L.; Audebert, F.; Feiterna-Sperling, C.; Gillor, D.; Jakubowski, P.; Jonsson-Oldenbüttel, C.; Khaykin, P.; Kiener, R.; Reitter, A.; Rieke, A.; et al. Not recommended, but done: Breastfeeding with HIV in Germany. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2021, 35, 33–38.
  73. Eccles, R.; du Toit, M.; de Jongh, G.; Krüger, E. Breastfeeding outcomes and associated risks in HIV-infected and HIV-exposed infants: A systematic review. Breastfeed. Med. 2022, 17, 112–130.
  74. Li, K.M.C.; Li, K.Y.C.; Bick, D.; Chang, Y.S. Human immunodeficiency virus-positive women’s perspectives on breastfeeding with antiretrovirals: A qualitative evidence synthesis. Matern. Child. Nutr. 2021, 17, e13244.
  75. Nair, R.; Maseeh, A. Vitamin D: The “sunshine” vitamin. J. Pharmacol. Pharmacother. 2012, 3, 118–126.
  76. Hossein-nezhad, A.; Holick, M.F. Vitamin D for health: A global perspective. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2013, 88, 720–755.
  77. Bouillon, R.; Manousaki, D.; Rosen, C.; Trajanoska, K.; Rivadeneira, F.; Richards, J.B. The health effects of vitamin D supplementation: Evidence from human studies. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2022, 18, 96–110.
  78. við Streym, S.; Højskov, C.S.; Møller, U.K.; Heickendorff, L.; Vestergaard, P.; Mosekilde, L.; Rejnmark, L. Vitamin D content in human breast milk: A 9-mo follow-up study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 103, 107–114.
  79. Saggese, G.; Vierucci, F.; Boot, A.M.; Czech-Kowalska, J.; Weber, G.; Camargo, C.A., Jr.; Mallet, E.; Fanos, M.; Shaw, N.J.; Holick, M.F. Vitamin D in childhood and adolescence: An expert position statement. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2015, 174, 565–576.
  80. Vierucci, F.; Fusani, L.; Saba, A.; Minucciani, T.; Belluomini, M.P.; Domenici, R.; Bracco, G.L.; Vaccaro, A.; Federico, G. Gestational vitamin D3 supplementation and sun exposure significantly influence cord blood vitamin D status and 3-epi-25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels in term newborns. Clin. Chim. Acta 2022, 524, 59–68.
  81. Munns, C.F.; Shaw, N.; Kiely, M.; Specker, B.L.; Thacher, T.D.; Ozono, K.; Michigami, T.; Tiosano, D.; Mughal, M.Z.; Mäkitie, O.; et al. Global consensus recommendations on prevention and management of nutritional rickets. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 101, 394–415.
  82. Saggese, G.; Vierucci, F.; Prodam, F.; Cardinale, F.; Cetin, I.; Chiappini, E.; De’ Angelis, G.L.; Massari, M.; Miraglia Del Giudice, E.; Miraglia Del Giudice, M.; et al. Vitamin D in pediatric age: Consensus of the Italian Pediatric Society and the Italian Society of Preventive and Social Pediatrics, jointly with the Italian Federation of Pediatricians. Ital. J. Pediatr. 2018, 44, 51.
  83. Tan, M.L.; Abrams, S.A.; Osborn, D.A. Vitamin D supplementation for term breastfed infants to prevent vitamin D deficiency and improve bone health. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2020, 12, CD013046.
  84. O’Callaghan, K.M.; Taghivand, M.; Zuchniak, A.; Onoyovwi, A.; Korsiak, J.; Leung, M.; Roth, D.E. Vitamin D in breastfed infants: Systematic review of alternatives to daily supplementation. Adv. Nutr. 2020, 11, 144–159.
  85. Jullien, S. Vitamin D prophylaxis in infancy. BMC Pediatr. 2021, 21 (Suppl. 1), 319.
  86. Bradley, R.; Schloss, J.; Brown, D.; Celis, D.; Finnell, J.; Hedo, R.; Honcharov, V.; Pantuso, T.; Peña, H.; Lauche, R.; et al. The effects of vitamin D on acute viral respiratory infections: A rapid review. Adv. Integr. Med. 2020, 7, 192–202.
  87. Siddiqui, M.; Manansala, J.S.; Abdulrahman, H.A.; Nasrallah, G.K.; Smatti, M.K.; Younes, N.; Althani, A.A.; Yassine, H.M. Immune modulatory effects of vitamin D on viral infections. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2879.
  88. Ismailova, A.; White, J.H. Vitamin D, infections and immunity. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2021, 1–13.
  89. Science, M.; Maguire, J.L.; Russell, M.L.; Smieja, M.; Walter, S.D.; Loeb, M. Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and risk of upper respiratory tract infection in children and adolescents. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2013, 57, 392–397.
  90. Cayir, A.; Turan, M.I.; Ozkan, O.; Cayir, Y.; Kaya, A.; Davutoglu, S.; Ozkan, B. Serum vitamin D levels in children with recurrent otitis media. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2014, 271, 689–693.
  91. Golan-Tripto, I.; Loewenthal, N.; Tal, A.; Dizitzer, Y.; Baumfeld, Y.; Goldbart, A. Vitamin D deficiency in children with acute bronchiolitis: A prospective cross-sectional case-control study. BMC Pediatr. 2021, 21, 211.
  92. Najada, A.S.; Habashneh, M.S.; Khader, M. The frequency of nutritional rickets among hospitalized infants and its relation to respiratory diseases. J. Trop. Pediatr. 2004, 50, 364–368.
  93. Banajeh, S.M. Nutritional rickets and vitamin D deficiency--association with the outcomes of childhood very severe pneumonia: A prospective cohort study. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2009, 44, 1207–1215.
  94. Fernandes, A.S.; Lobo, S.; Sandes, A.R.; Simão, C.; Lobo, L.; Bandeira, T. Vitamin D-dependent rickets: A resurgence of the rachitic lung in the 21st century. BMJ Case Rep. 2015, 2015, bcr2015212639.
  95. Deng, Q.F.; Chu, H.; Wen, Z.; Cao, Y.S. Vitamin D and urinary tract infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2019, 49, 134–142.
  96. Li, H.B.; Tai, X.H.; Sang, Y.H.; Jia, J.P.; Xu, Z.M.; Cui, X.F.; Dai, S. Association between vitamin D and development of otitis media: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis and systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016, 95, e4739.
  97. Thornton, K.A.; Marín, C.; Mora-Plazas, M.; Villamor, E. Vitamin D deficiency associated with increased incidence of gastrointestinal and ear infections in school-age children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2013, 32, 585–593.
  98. Bucak, I.H.; Ozturk, A.B.; Almis, H.; Cevik, M.Ö.; Tekin, M.; Konca, Ç.; Turgut, M.; Bulbul, M. Is there a relationship between low vitamin D and rotaviral diarrhea? Pediatr. Int. 2016, 58, 270–273.
  99. Cusick, S.E.; Opoka, R.O.; Lund, T.C.; John, C.C.; Polgreen, L.E. Vitamin D insufficiency is common in Ugandan children and is associated with severe malaria. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e113185.
  100. Diro, E.; Lynen, L.; Gebregziabiher, B.; Assefa, A.; Lakew, W.; Belew, Z.; Hailu, A.; Boelaert, M.; van Griensven, J. Clinical aspects of paediatric visceral leishmaniasis in North-west Ethiopia. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2015, 20, 8–16.
  101. Eltayeb, A.A.; Abdou, M.A.; Abdel-aal, A.M.; Othman, M.H. Vitamin D status and viral response to therapy in hepatitis C infected children. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 21, 1284–1291.
  102. Xiao, D.; Zhang, X.; Ying, J.; Zhou, Y.; Li, X.; Mu, D.; Qu, Y. Association between vitamin D status and sepsis in children: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Clin. Nutr. 2020, 39, 1735–1741.
  103. He, M.; Cao, T.; Wang, J.; Wang, C.; Wang, Z.; Abdelrahim, M.E.A. Vitamin D deficiency relation to sepsis, paediatric risk of mortality III score, need for ventilation support, length of hospital stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill children: A meta-analysis. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2021, 75, e13908.
  104. Yu, L.; Ke, H.J.; Che, D.; Luo, S.L.; Guo, Y.; Wu, J.L. Effect of pandemic-related confinement on vitamin D status among children aged 0–6 years in Guangzhou, China: A cross-sectional study. Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy 2020, 13, 2669–2675.
  105. Zeng, J.; Wu, G.; Yang, W.; Gu, X.; Liang, W.; Yao, Y.; Song, Y. A serum vitamin D level <25 nmol/L pose high tuberculosis risk: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0126014.
  106. Keflie, T.S.; Nölle, N.; Lambert, C.; Nohr, D.; Biesalski, H.K. Vitamin D deficiencies among tuberculosis patients in Africa: A systematic review. Nutrition 2015, 31, 1204–1212.
  107. Xia, J.; Shi, L.; Zhao, L.; Xu, F. Impact of vitamin D supplementation on the outcome of tuberculosis treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Chin. Med. J. (Engl.) 2014, 127, 3127–3134.
  108. Aibana, O.; Huang, C.C.; Aboud, S.; Arnedo-Pena, A.; Becerra, M.C.; Bellido-Blasco, J.B.; Bhosale, R.; Calderon, R.; Chiang, S.; Contreras, C.; et al. Vitamin D status and risk of incident tuberculosis disease: A nested case-control study, systematic review, and individual-participant data meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2019, 16, e1002907.
  109. Maretzke, F.; Bechthold, A.; Egert, S.; Ernst, J.B.; Melo van Lent, D.; Pilz, S.; Reichrath, J.; Stangl, G.I.; Stehle, P.; Volkert, D.; et al. Role of vitamin D in preventing and treating selected extraskeletal diseases-an Umbrella review. Nutrients 2020, 12, 969.
  110. Das, R.R.; Singh, M.; Naik, S.S. Vitamin D as an adjunct to antibiotics for the treatment of acute childhood pneumonia. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018, 7, CD011597.
  111. Yang, C.; Lu, Y.; Wan, M.; Xu, D.; Yang, X.; Yang, L.; Wang, S.; Sun, G. Efficacy of high-dose vitamin D supplementation as an adjuvant treatment on pneumonia: Systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Nutr. Clin. Pract. 2021, 36, 368–384.
  112. Esposito, S.; Jones, M.H.; Feleszko, W.; Martell, J.A.O.; Falup-Pecurariu, O.; Geppe, N.; Martinón-Torres, F.; Shen, K.L.; Roth, M.; Principi, N. Prevention of new respiratory episodes in children with recurrent respiratory infections: An expert consensus statement. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1810.
  113. Chiappini, E.; Santamaria, F.; Marseglia, G.L.; Marchisio, P.; Galli, L.; Cutrera, R.; de Martino, M.; Antonini, S.; Becherucci, P.; Biasci, P.; et al. Prevention of recurrent respiratory infections: Inter-society consensus. Ital. J. Pediatr. 2021, 47, 211.
  114. Ganmaa, D.; Enkhmaa, D.; Nasantogtokh, E.; Sukhbaatar, S.; Tumur-Ochir, K.E.; Manson, J.E. Vitamin D, respiratory infections, and chronic disease: Review of meta-analyses and randomized clinical trials. J. Intern. Med. 2022, 291, 141–164.
More
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Pediatrics
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
View Times: 824
Revisions: 3 times (View History)
Update Date: 09 Mar 2022
1000/1000
Hot Most Recent
Academic Video Service