Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Gabriella D'Amore
 + 3424 word(s) 3424 2022-01-13 08:46:49 |
2 Done
Jason Zhu
 + 47 word(s) 3471 2022-02-28 03:44:59 | |
3 Done
Jason Zhu
 Meta information modification 3471 2022-02-28 04:59:39 | |
4 We have summarized its contents
Gabriella D'Amore
 -2539 word(s) 932 2022-03-18 18:52:58 | |
5 Language
Flavio BOCCIA
Meta information modification 932 2022-03-20 12:45:01 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
D'amore, G.; Di Vaio, A.; Balsalobre Lorente, D.; Boccia, F. Artificial Intelligence in Water–Energy–Food Model. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/19937 (accessed on 05 May 2024).
D'amore G, Di Vaio A, Balsalobre Lorente D, Boccia F. Artificial Intelligence in Water–Energy–Food Model. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/19937. Accessed May 05, 2024.
D'amore, Gabriella, Assunta Di Vaio, Daniel Balsalobre Lorente, Flavio Boccia. "Artificial Intelligence in Water–Energy–Food Model" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/19937 (accessed May 05, 2024).
D'amore, G., Di Vaio, A., Balsalobre Lorente, D., & Boccia, F. (2022, February 26). Artificial Intelligence in Water–Energy–Food Model. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/19937
D'amore, Gabriella, et al. "Artificial Intelligence in Water–Energy–Food Model." Encyclopedia. Web. 26 February, 2022.
Artificial Intelligence in Water–Energy–Food Model
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/su14020867

The role of artificial intelligence (AI) in the Water–Energy–Food (WEF) nexus under the lens of institutional, stakeholder, and innovation theories has been studied recently. Research on AI for WEF nexus management has adopted mostly a technical perspective, neglecting the relevance of management tools and the business model concept. An integrated approach for managing the nexus through AI technologies is proposed to meet sustainable and responsible business models. The gap between research and policy making could be filled by combining scientific data and policy needs with inclusive tools that are technically viable for sustainable resource utilization.

artificial intelligence (AI) Water–Energy–Food (WEF) nexus business models
Over the past two decades, scholars and practitioners have been paying increasing attention to the concept of Water–Energy–Food (WEF). This process has tried to become a nexus for the “right way” to optimize the use of natural resources, promoting environmental sustainability goals [1][2][3]. The WEF nexus concept originates from the international discussion on sustainable development during the World Economic Forum in 2011, used to describe the interconnections and interdependencies among water, food, and energy sectors [4]. Water is needed to generate energy and grow food; energy is required for water supply and produces food; and food can generate energy, reducing waste [5]. This means that any issue in managing one of these resources can affect the others, and each resource can benefit from the synergies coming from an integrated approach to their use.
Conceived as a tool “to promote policy coherence through identifying optimal policy mixes and governance arrangements across the water, energy and food sectors” ([6], p. 165), the WEF nexus has gained prominence after the adoption of the UN 2030 Agenda in 2015 for handling the sustainable development goal (SDG) interconnections, specifically for SDG#2 (zero hunger), SDG#6 (clean water and sanitation), and SDG#7 (affordable and clean energy) [7][8]. According to Le Blanc [9], the successful achievement of the UN 2030 Agenda needs to consider the potential trade-offs and synergies among several SDGs. Indeed, the UN 2030 Agenda footprint recognizes in its conceptualization the existence of interconnections among targets to achieve the SDGs, which require the implementation of coherent policies and solutions across different actors and sectors [10]. Despite the great efforts of academia concerning these issues, there has not been much progress in developing and adopting coherent policies and tools to handle SDGs’ interlinkages [7][11][12]. The literature on the WEF approach has highlighted the existence of several constraints to its implementation to meet SDGs, such as rigid frameworks, entrenched interests, planning and implementation procedures, and a lack of information tools capable of supporting decision-making processes [7][8][12]. Scholars agree on the need to establish coordination and cooperation mechanisms applicable to support institutions and governments in the definition of policy goals and actions for leading to the desired outcomes. However, they struggle to provide insights on the conditions, dynamics, and factors that enable cross-sector coordination and collaboration [6].
Recent studies [12][13][14] found sustainability goals and sustainable performance cannot be achieved without innovations. The overlapping of data and information, the lack of adequate knowledge of human resources, and the unpredictability of climate events could severely affect decision-making processes, leading to sub-optimal solutions and slowing down the sustainability agenda. Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies can process large amounts of data, reveal information that otherwise would remain hidden, and solve complex problems. Yet, the contribution of AI is not limited to data processing. Still, it has the potential to identify science-based solutions for environmental and climate degradation problems that are not biased by specific individual or groups interests [13], supporting multi-stakeholder decision-making processes towards sustainability. AI can help the multiple players involved in the water, energy, and food industries to meet the UN 2030 Agenda.
Some scholars [15][16][17] have highlighted how AI is able to change not only the way to generate and use information for decision making [18], but also the ways of doing business from a sustainable and socially responsible perspective [19][20]. Caprani [21] (p. 103) highlights the significant role of business in achieving global transformational development, but this has been almost entirely ignored by the literature on the WEF that has focused mostly on the other stakeholders (e.g., governments and community). Moreover, while some scholars have highlighted the relevance of digital technologies in the water, energy, and food sectors [15][17][22][23], the potential role of AI for the management of the WEF nexus has been underestimated, as has its contribution to the governance of multiple interactions among the resources, sectors, and institutions involved.
The analysis of the articles in current data collection highlights that the policy and decision makers lack access to comprehensive tools that include all stakeholders and consider the multi-scale nature and context-dependence of the nexus. Digital platforms have been developed to define and quantify the interconnectivity between water, energy, and food resources and include integrative and holistic management strategies to plan the future allocation of these resources. Moreover, current results evidence that in the literature, the attention to the role of AI for rethinking and redesigning business models for sustainability, including the WEF nexus challenge, is still under-researched. The combination of WEF natural resource information with a business model, thanks to the use of AI, may allow considering both technical and financial issues within companies while respecting the WEF approach and contributing to the UN 2030 Agenda [24]. AI applications, with the support of other digital technologies, capable of gathering and elaborating biophysical and technical data with financial data, may support business managers’ and external investors’ decision-making processes by proposing alternative solutions of investments. A digitalized platform or database can offer alternative solutions that include data on water, energy, and land consumption, and the cost analysis for each solution could support consistently addressing the WEF nexus.
 

References

  1. Di Vaio, A.; Trujillo, L.; D’Amore, G.; Palladino, R. Water governance models for meeting sustainable development Goals: A structured literature review. Util. Policy 2021, 72, 101255.
  2. Laspidou, C.S.; Mellios, N.K.; Spyropoulou, A.E.; Kofinas, D.T.; Papadopoulou, M.P. Systems thinking on the resource nexus: Modeling and visualization tools to identify critical interlinkages for resilient and sustainable societies and institutions. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 717, 137264.
  3. Olawuyi, D. Sustainable development and the water-energy-food nexus: Legal challenges and emerging solutions. Environ. Sci. Policy 2020, 103, 1–9.
  4. Hoff, H. Understanding the nexus. In Background Paper for the Bonn 2011 Nexus Conference: The Water, Energy and Food Security Nexus; Stockholm Environment Institute: Stockholm, Sweden, 2011.
  5. Stringer, L.C.; Quinn, C.H.; Berman, R.J.; Le, H.T.V.; Msuya, F.E.; Orchard, S.E.; Pezzuti, J.C.B. Combining Nexus and Resilience Thinking in a Novel Framework to Enable More Equitable and Just Outcomes; Sustainability Research Institute Paper No. 193; Sustainability Research Institute: Leeds, UK, 2014; Volume 73.
  6. Weitz, N.; Strambo, C.; Kemp-Benedict, E.; Nilsson, M. Closing the governance gaps in the water-energy-food nexus: Insights from integrative governance. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2017, 45, 165–173.
  7. Pahl-Wostl, C. Governance of the water-energy-food security nexus: A multilevel coordination challenge. Environ. Sci. Policy 2019, 92, 356–367.
  8. Kurian, M. The water–energy–food nexus: Trade-offs, thresholds and transdisciplinary approaches to sustainable development. Environ. Sci. Policy 2017, 68, 97–106.
  9. Le Blanc, D. Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 23, 176–187.
  10. Srigiri, S.R.; Dombrowsky, I. Governance of the water-energy-food nexus for an integrated implementation of the 2030 Agenda: Conceptual and methodological framework for analysis. Discuss. Pap. 2021, 2, 1–28.
  11. Simpson, G.B.; Jewitt, G.P. The water-energy-food nexus in the Anthropocene: Moving from ’nexus thinking ’to ’nexus action. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2019, 40, 117–123.
  12. Albrecht, T.R.; Crootof, A.; Scott, C.A. The water–energy–food nexus: A systematic review of methods for nexus assessment. Environ. Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 043002.
  13. Silvestre, B.S.; Ţîrcă, D.M. Innovations for sustainable development: Moving toward a sustainable future. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 208, 325–332.
  14. Nishant, R.; Kennedy, M.; Corbett, J. Artificial intelligence for sustainability: Challenges, opportunities, and a research agenda. Int. J. Infor. Manag. 2020, 53, 102104.
  15. Di Vaio, A.; Hassan, R.; Alavoine, C. Data intelligence and analytics: A bibliometric analysis of human–Artificial intelligence in public sector decision-making effectiveness. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2022, 174, 121201.
  16. Di Vaio, A.; Palladino, R.; Hassan, R.; Escobar, O. Artificial intelligence and business models in the sustainable development goals perspective: A systematic literature review. J. Bus. Resear. 2020, 121, 283–314.
  17. Di Vaio, A.; Boccia, F.; Landriani, L.; Palladino, R. Artificial intelligence in the agri-food system: Rethinking sustainable business models in the COVID-19 scenario. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4851.
  18. Mikalef, P.; Framnes, V.A.; Danielsen, F.; Krogstie, J.; Olsen, D. Big Data Analytics Capability: Antecedents and Business Value. In Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Langkawi Island, Malaysia, 16–20 July 2017; p. 136.
  19. Schneider, S.; Leyer, M. Me or information technology? Adoption of artificial intelligence in the delegation of personal strategic decisions. Manag. Dec. Econ. 2019, 40, 223–231.
  20. Bebbington, J.; Unerman, J. Achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Account. Audit. Account. J. 2018, 31, 2–24.
  21. Caprani, L. Five Ways the Sustainable Development Goals are Better than the Millennium Development Goals and Why Every Educationalist Should Care. Manag. Educ. 2016, 30, 102–104.
  22. Duan, W.L.; Chen, Y.N.; Zou, S.; Nover, D. Managing the water-climate- food nexus for sustainable development in Turkmenistan. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 20, 220.
  23. Dwivedi, Y.K.; Hughes, L.; Ismagilova, E.; Aarts, G.; Coombs, C.; Crick, T.; Duan, Y.; Dwivedi, R.; Edwards, J.; Eirug, A. Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. Int. J. Infor. Manag. 2021, 57, 101994.
  24. Mosalam, H.A.; El-Barad, M. Design of an integration platform between the water-energy nexus and a business model applied for sustainable development. Water Sci. Technol. 2020, 81, 1398–1405.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Business; Management
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Gabriella D'Amore
,
ASSUNTA DI VAIO
,
Daniel Balsalobre Lorente
,
Flavio BOCCIA
View Times: 728
Revisions: 5 times (View History)
Update Date: 20 Mar 2022
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Feedback