Leptospirosis Kidney Disease

Version	Summary	Created by	Modification	Content Size	Created at	Operation
1		Wiwat Chancharoenthana	+ 3531 word(s)	3531	2022-02-22 09:15:55	\|
2	done	Jason Zhu	Meta information modification	3531	2022-02-24 02:41:25	\| \|
3	Done	Jason Zhu	Meta information modification	3531	2022-02-25 09:04:55	\|

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/cells11040698

Leptospirosis is a zoonotic and waterborne disease worldwide. Leptospirosis emerges as a leading cause of acute febrile illness along with hepatorenal injury in many countries, including Thailand. Although acute kidney injury in the spectrum of interstitial nephritis is a well-described characteristic in severe leptospirosis, chronic kidney disease from leptospirosis is widely discussed. Early recognition of severe leptospirosis leads to reduce morbidity and mortality.

acute kidney injury immune response interstitial nephritis leptospirosis

1. Pathophysiology

1.1. Acute Kidney Injury in Leptospirosis

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common manifestation of leptospirosis. Renal involvement in leptospirosis varies from asymptomatic urinary abnormalities to severe AKI that requires supportive dialysis. The most common renal pathology in leptospirosis is acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN), whereas hypokalemia and sodium wasting are the common laboratory findings. Interestingly, AKI caused by leptospirosis is usually non-oliguric, and hypokalemia accounts for 45–50% of all AKI cases ^[1]. ATIN from leptospirosis is characterized by diffuse interstitial edema and mononuclear cell infiltration. Notably, glomerular involvement in leptospirosis is less common. Leptospirosis-induced vasculitis is rare, with unfavorable renal outcomes that can be attenuated by corticosteroid administration ^[2]^[3]^[4]^[5]. Different mechanisms have been proposed for non-oliguric, hypokalemic AKI in leptospirosis (discussed below).

Tubular Dysfunction and Related Electrolyte Disturbances

Several tubular defects have also been reported, such as bicarbonaturia, glucosuria, decreased proximal tubule sodium reabsorption, and high excretion of phosphate and uric acid, also known as Fanconi syndrome ^[6]^[7]^[8]. Reductions in sodium–hydrogen exchanger isoform 3 (NHE3), which is expressed along with aquaporin 1 (AQP1) in the apical membrane of the proximal tubule, and decrease in α-Na⁺/K⁺–ATPase ^[9] cause several complications. Hyponatremia in leptospirosis is attributed to several causes, including increased urinary sodium loss, cellular efflux of sodium from Na⁺/K⁺–ATPase defects, increased levels of antidiuretic hormone (ADH), and resetting of the osmoreceptors ^[10]. Accordingly, the combination of the clinical clues of hyponatremia, hypokalemia, and non-oliguric AKI (or polyuria) are unique characteristics of leptospirosis nephropathy.

In addition, downregulation of the sodium-potassium-2-chloride co-transporter (NKCC2) in the medullary thick ascending limb (mTAL) of the loop of Henle may also explain the loss of sodium and potassium in the urine ^[9]^[11]^[12]. Polyuria or non-oliguric AKI occurring during the first stage of leptospirosis might be another symptom related to the reduced expression of aquaporin 2 (AQP2) and a urinary concentration defect due to resistance of the inner medullary collecting duct to vasopressin. During the recovery phase of AKI, AQP2 expression increases as a compensatory mechanism ^[9].

Hypomagnesemia is also common in leptospirosis patients with AKI from magnesium wasting ^[13]. One experimental study also reported renal magnesium wasting secondary to decreased NKCC2 on the apical membrane of mTAL ^[12]. Accordingly, hypomagnesemia and hypophosphatemia caused by hypermagnesuria and hyperphosphaturia, respectively, should be closely monitored during the course of leptospirosis infection. Hypomagnesemia from tubular dysfunction in leptospirosis may cause dramatic changes in magnesium homeostasis, which needs substantial amounts of magnesium replacement, especially in patients with myalgia, lethargy, and arrhythmias. On the other hand, rapid correction of hypomagnesemia may cause unintentionally increase circulating magnesium levels because leptospirosis may contribute to AKI, which may decrease magnesium clearance. Likewise, severe hypophosphatemia (defined as serum phosphate <1.5 mg/dL) from proximal tubulopathy may contribute to metabolic encephalopathy and myopathy. Accordingly, as the authors’ experience, serum magnesium and phosphate levels should be evaluated every 3–5 days and 1–2 days, respectively, particularly in severe leptospirosis.

Interestingly, leptospirosis-related AKI occasionally requires supportive renal replacement therapy in the acute phase of infection. The kidneys may fully recover after the complete course of early antimicrobial therapy. Effective treatment of leptospirosis reversed tubular dysfunction in an in vitro study ^[12]. Leptospirosis patients also have more favorable outcomes with non-oliguric than with oliguric AKI ^[1].

1.2. Leptospirosis with Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS)

Severe leptospirosis is complicated by sepsis and septic shock ^[14]^[15]. In the early phase, leptospirosis is related to an overwhelming activation of inflammasomes and proinflammatory cytokines, causing kidney inflammation and subsequent damage. Leptospira can be found in the proximal tubular cells at day 10 of the infection, and it can subsequently be found in the tubular lumen at day 14 of the infection ^[16]. Its antigens are also found in the proximal tubular cells, macrophages, and the interstitium ^[17].

The outer membrane proteins (OMPs) of Leptospira contain antigenic and virulent compounds, including lipoproteins, lipopolysaccharides (LPS), and peptidoglycans, which determine the host responses. In animal models of sepsis, LPS or endotoxin cause detrimental effects to the host ^[18]^[19]. Leptospira LPS, located on the OMP, appear to be the major antigens that affect immunity to Leptospira and believe its functions relevant to host–pathogen interactions which determine virulence and pathogenesis. To elucidate the mechanisms of tubule-interstitial injury caused by Leptospira, the Leptospiral OMPs were extracted on cultured mouse renal epithelial cells, which showed the expression of a variety of genes related to tubular cell injury and inflammation ^[20]. The Leptospiral OMPs activate nuclear transcription factor kappa B (NF-KB), activator protein-1, and several downstream genes expressed in the medullary thick ascending limb cells ^[20]. LipL32, a major pathogenic lipoprotein on the OMP, induces tubulointerstitial nephritis-mediated gene expression in mouse proximal tubular cells and is a prominent immunogen during leptospirosis infection in humans ^[21]. In addition, LipL32 is a hemolysin that causes hemolysis of erythrocytes during Leptospira infection ^[22], and it directly affects proximal tubular cells by substantially increasing the gene and protein expression of several pro-inflammatory cytokines, including inducible nitric oxide (iNOS), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). Therefore, the identification of novel OMPs of the Leptospira should remain a primary focus for increasing knowledge of leptospirosis pathogenesis and treatment.

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are proteins that recognize specific molecular patterns of pathogens and represent the first line of immune defense mechanisms in the innate immune response. The effects of TLRs were evaluated to determine whether TLRs could mediate the inflammatory response induced by Leptospiral OMP in renal proximal tubular cells. Interestingly, only TLR2 but not TLR4 increased the expression of iNOS and MCP-1. Accordingly, the findings indicate that the stimulation of iNOS and MCP-1 caused by pathogenic Leptospiral OMPs, in particular LipL32, in proximal tubular cells requires TLR2 (usually co-expressed with TLR1) for the early inflammatory response ^[23].

Then, a cascade of inflammation is activated in the renal tubular cells, as leptospirosis induces interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18 secretion from human macrophage cells through reactive oxygen species and cathepsin B mediated-NLRP3 inflammasome activation ^[24]. Other circulatory cytokines and chemokines, including IL-6, IL-10, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and TNF-α ^[25], are also produced during leptospirosis infection. Acute cytokine and chemokine surges occurring in leptospirosis patients can cause a detrimental syndrome of sepsis and severe sepsis due to an imbalance between pro- and anti-inflammatory responses. Increased levels of MCP-1, IL-11, and small inducible cytokine A2 occur during leptospirosis with thrombocytopenia ^[26]. These findings infer a role of cytokine and chemokine production during the acute and subacute phases of leptospirosis infection. Conversely, chronic inflammasome activation may be the pathway that leads to renal parenchyma fibrosis or CKD ^[27].

AKI following leptospirosis may thus arise due to acute tubular necrosis (ATN) from ischemia and poor renal tissue perfusion as the result of sepsis and septic shock. In addition, sepsis-associated AKI (sepsis-AKI) in leptospirosis is also possible, especially in patients with a low blood pressure episode. Evidence from both experimental and clinical studies shows that septic shock develops into a sepsis-related immunosuppression state, leading to the death of the host because of innate and adaptive immunity disturbances ^[28]. Therefore, circulating cytokines and chemokines may interfere with the immune response in severe leptospirosis; for example, low circulating neutrophils levels may be associated with impaired antimicrobial activity ^[29]^[30]^[31].

1.3. Chronic Kidney Disease in Leptospirosis

The consequences of ATIN caused by leptospirosis infection include tubular atrophy and interstitial nephritis in the event of unsuccessful treatment or incomplete recovery. In an attempt to elucidate the causal association between Leptospira and renal fibrosis, the effects of OMP from pathogenic Leptospira on the production and accumulation of extracellular matrix have been explored ^[32]. The binding of Leptospiral OMP to proximal tubular cells, HK-2 cells, led to an increase of type I and type IV collagens in a dose-dependent manner. Likewise, the active transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 secretion was increased twice following the addition of Leptospira OMP, while anti-TGF-β1-neutralizing antibodies attenuated the increased production of type I and type IV collagen, indicating the participation of TGF-β1 in the cascade. This phenomenon was confirmed by the increased nuclear translocation of SMAD3 after the administration of Leptospiral OMP, and overexpression of the dominant-negative SMAD3 prevented the Leptospiral OMP-induced increase of type I and IV collagen production without any effects on metalloproteinase activity ^[32]. This clearly demonstrated the effects of Leptospiral OMP in terms of enhancing extracellular matrix synthesis mediated by the TGF-β1/SMAD pathway.

Although data from both in vitro and in vivo studies indicate the possibility of CKD and renal fibrosis due to leptospirosis infection ^[32]^[33]^[34], the results from both a meta-analysis ^[35] and a long-term, three-year follow up study are inconsistent, as no leptospirosis patients with dialysis dependence were reported ^[36]. Chronic tubulointerstitial nephritis (CTIN) is a common lesion associated with long-standing leptospirosis that may lead to CKD of unknown etiology and subsequent renal failure. Sustained tubulointerstitial lymphocyte infiltration might be a key factor resulting in the progression to CKD ^[36]. Perhaps, TLRs may be involved in the AKI–CKD continuum in leptospirosis because TLRs are known to be a key factor in the primary response to both innate and adaptive immunity ^[33] as well as ischemia-reperfusion injury, glomerulonephritis, and sepsis-AKI. Therefore, further studies should seek to identify the molecular factors that may act as a danger signal by triggering the inflammatory response to different exogenous and endogenous noxious stimuli.

2. Clinical Manifestations

The clinical manifestations of leptospirosis are diverse, ranging from mild, non-specific symptoms, such as flu-like symptoms (fever, myalgia, and headache), to severe symptoms along with end-stage organ injuries (e.g., AKI, acute hepatic failure, and bleeding diathesis, also known as Weil’s syndrome), acute hemoptysis from pulmonary hemorrhage, acute confusion from aseptic meningoencephalitis, and acute heart failure from acute or subacute myocarditis ^[37].

Accordingly, the three indicators of suspected leptospirosis infection consist of (i) acute febrile illness, (ii) jaundice, and (iii) acute kidney injury ^[38]. The predictors of a severe form of leptospirosis are severe myalgia at onset, severe bleeding tendency, and marked jaundice. Interestingly, the presence of either pre-existing chronic kidney disease (small kidney size) or enlarged, congested kidneys with anuria is related to the worst outcome ^[38]. Thus, patients with leptospirosis-associated renal disease should be treated promptly.

3. Diagnosis

3.1. Clinical Diagnosis

A diagnosis of leptospirosis is based on the history of exposure, risk factors, and clinical manifestations. A high index of suspicion can circumvent later organ damage. However, symptoms of leptospirosis are often mistaken for other causes of acute febrile syndrome, such as dengue infection, malaria, hepatitis, and active autoimmune disease. The lack of pathognomonic signs of leptospirosis means that the diagnosis is tentatively based on the evaluation of fever and myalgia in patients from an endemic area. For this reason, laboratory diagnosis of leptospirosis is essential.

3.2. Laboratory Diagnosis

Leptospirosis is difficult to diagnose in the laboratory, especially during the acute phase. It can be performed by directly identifying spirochetes or their components in bodily fluids or tissues, isolating leptospires in culture, or detecting particular antibodies throughout different clinical phases. Leptospirosis is difficult to distinguish from illnesses, such as malaria, dengue fever, rickettsia, influenza, hepatitis, and yellow fever because of its vague clinical appearance. As a result, lab tests are needed to confirm the diagnosis. The detection of antibodies against leptospires, leptospires themselves, or their deoxyribonucleic acid is the basis for these tests (DNA). Current laboratory diagnosis includes both direct identification (the detection of Leptospira spirochetes or DNA in the samples or isolation of the organism from specimens) and indirect detection (serological diagnosis or serology for identifying Leptospiral infection, which is based on the detection of specific antibodies against various Leptospiral antigens).

3.2.1. Direct Microscopic Examination, Culture, and Antigen Detection

Leptospires are thin, bright, actively motile spirals with characteristically rapid spinning (twitching motility) under the conventional darkfield microscope (DFM) and approximately, 10 leptospires/ mL are necessary for the detection of one cell per field. With one week longer in the duration of the infection, there is approximately 10% deceased in yield of DFM (from 100 to 90%). To enhance the sensitivity, several special staining methods; Warthin–Starry silver staining ^[39] and immunostaining (immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunomagnetic antigen capture, and immunoperoxidase staining ^[40]) that requires the serovar specific primary antibodies (in isolation or in combination).

In parallel, Leptospira culture from blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, and biopsy tissue is possible during the first few days to 10 days post-onset of symptoms of illness (leptospiremic stage). Because they are slow-growing (6–8 h doubling time), fastidious and prone to contamination, the culture samples must be kept for at least 3–4 months before being discarded as negative) with only 23% sensitivity but it is necessary for the drug sensitivity test ^[41]. As such, EMJH (Ellinghausen–McCullough–Johnson–Harris) media (oleic albumin complex) consists of bovine serum albumin (fraction V), Tween 80, ammonium chloride thiamine, monopotassium phosphate, disodium phosphate, and various nutrients ^[42] is most commonly used, while the more specialized T80/40/LH media (polysorbate 40, lactalbumin hydrolysate, superoxide dismutase, and rabbit serum), is required for some serovars ^[43]. For the primary isolation of the large and diverse range of fastidious pathogenic leptospires, Hornsby–Alt–Nally (HAN), seems to be a good media ^[44].

Detection of Leptospiral antigens by immunoperoxidase, immunofluorescence, or an immunomagnetic antigen-capture system has been developed for specimens with low bacterial burdens or dark-field microscopy cannot be used but is not routinely performed due to the limitation on primary antibody ^[40]. In contrast, nucleic acid recognition with novel DNA amplification; polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (i.e., nested-PCR, quantitative PCR [qPCR]), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), and next-generation sequencing (NGS) is valuable for an early and accurate laboratory diagnosis, especially with the Leptospira isolation using biological media inoculation and DNA hybridization (DNA probe) ^[45]^[46].

A variety of Leptospiral targets (such as 16S ribosomal RNA) or DNA can be amplified for diagnosis ^[47] and real-time PCR (RT-PCR) is more sensitive and specific than standard PCR ^[48]. Because some RT-PCR primers may bind to a non-specific site, leading to false positive results, most recent real-time multiplex PCR assays have been developed using two sets of primers ^[49]. Nested PCR also helps in detecting more specific and sensitive DNA sites with additional sets of primers ^[50]^[51]. However, current trends for leptospirosis diagnosis are the use of both serological and molecular techniques, such as PCR and ELISA (easier than the gold standard serological MAT), for resource-limited countries ^[52]^[53]. Additionally, the LAMP technique ^[54] to detect a 16S rRNA gene (rrs), is a cost-effective, rapid and high-yield for detecting the pathogenic leptospires in the urine. Currently, NGS is the most precisely-based culture-independent method on core genome analysis in body fluids (blood and urine) ^[55] and the future direction of leptospirosis tests would be to move towards the molecular classification of leptospires, which overcomes the limitation of culture isolation of leptospires from clinical samples. Hence, the value of PCR in the clinical diagnosis of leptospirosis is particularly good and several modern techniques are emerging.

3.2.2. Anti-Leptospira Antibody Detection

Several serological diagnoses are used; for example, genus-specific antibody tests (indirect hemagglutination [IHA], enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA], Lepto Dri Dot [latex agglutination], microcapsule agglutination [MCAT]), and serovar-specific antibody tests (microscopic agglutination test [MAT]) ^[56]^[57]. As such, MAT criteria for diagnosis are (i) a fourfold titer rise in paired sera (seroconversion of the current infection) or (ii) a single high titer (≥1:400 or 1:800, higher in epidemic areas) (seropositivity) (antibodies may persist for some time after infection or the cross-react with other diseases). Additionally, MAT requires a live panel of all Leptospira serovars in the region, with a panel of locally standardized serovars ^[57]^[58] following the World Organization for Animal Health (19 antigens representative of 15 serogroups) ^[59]. Because antibodies are detectable at 5–7 days post-infection, the MAT test can be negative (titer < 1:50) during the first few days of infection. Diagnosis of leptospirosis can be performed by urine samples ^[60] using both serology and molecular detection (16S rRNA), particularly in patients with recent infection (MAT ≥1∶800 or ELISA IgM-positive or both) ^[61].

With limited resources, a clinical prediction score ^[62] based on the relevant clinical history and related laboratory tests with scoring in seven aspects is as follows: hypotension (3), jaundice (2), muscle pain (2), AKI (1.5), low hemoglobin (3), hypokalemia with hyponatremia (3), and neutrophilia (1) is proposed (a cutoff summarized score of 4 has the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.78 (95% CI 0.68–0.89) for leptospirosis diagnosis ^[40]). This Thai-Lepto-on-admission probability score could be a diagnostic tool for early presumptive diagnosis of leptospirosis in patients presenting with severe clinical suspicion of the disease.

4. Treatments

4.1. Specific Treatments for Leptospirosis

The treatment of leptospirosis-related kidney disease usually depends on the clinical symptoms, particularly in the early phase of infection. Therefore, early recognition and diagnosis of leptospirosis kidney disease are the principal factors driving favorable outcomes. In severe leptospirosis cases, the recommended intravenous antibiotics must be promptly prescribed at the time of diagnosis; these include 0.5–1 g ampicillin every 6 h, 1 g ceftriaxone every 12 h, or 1 g cefotaxime every 6 h. Notably, a study from Thailand showed that administration of 1.5 million units of intravenous sodium penicillin G every 6 h is equally effective to ceftriaxone in patients with severe leptospirosis ^[63]. Once-daily dosing has the added benefit of intramuscular administration in an out-patient setting as an alternative to intravenous administration. However, adult outpatients with an early onset of infection should receive either 100 mg doxycycline twice a day or 500 mg azithromycin daily. Antibiotic treatment is effective within 7–10 days of injection, but the injection of 5 million units/day benzyl penicillin should be prescribed for only 5 days. Patients who are hypersensitive or allergic to the penicillin group may be given 250 mg erythromycin four times a day for 5 days or 100 mg doxycycline twice daily for 10 days. Tetracycline is contraindicated in children, pregnant women, and renal insufficiency patients ^[64].

4.2. Sepsis and Organ Failure in Leptospirosis

Sepsis in leptospirosis, with or without shock, can occur as an unusual presentation, primarily in urban areas ^[14]. Similar to general sepsis management, the treatment of sepsis in leptospirosis is based on rapid administration of the correct antibiotic and the best supportive care ^[65]. As such, fluid administration is the cornerstone of sepsis resuscitation. In patients with fluid responder (less than 40% of septic patients), the stroke volume increases by 10–15% after a fluid challenge (250–500 mL), following the Frank–Starling principle (as the preload increases, the stroke volume increases until the optimal preload is achieved) ^[66]. With the optimal preload, the further fluid administration does not increase the stroke volume but increases arterial pressure, venous pressure, pulmonary hydrostatic pressure, and natriuretic peptide (a fluid shifting inducer from the intravascular portion into the interstitial space). Increased venous pressure (and renal subcapsular pressure) decreases the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of the kidney. According to the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI), fluid therapy in sepsis divides into rescue (high-volume resuscitation), optimization, stabilization, and de-escalation ^[67] depending on the individual patient. In the de-escalation phase, a reduction in total fluid administration, diuretics, and/or renal replacement therapy (RRT) might be necessary. For the fluid composition, normal saline (or 0.9% NaCl; a non-physiologic solution) might cause hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis that results in decreased renal blood flow ^[68]. Synthetic hydroxyethyl starch is potentially nephrotoxic ^[68]. Although normal saline is currently the main fluid replacement used in sepsis-AKI due to the availability with a reasonable price worldwide, a limited volume of normal saline with partial use of other fluid preparations might be beneficial.

Although acidosis is common in patients with sepsis, bicarbonate treatment is not recommended unless the blood pH is lower than 7.15 because sodium bicarbonate infusion leads to hypernatremia, hypervolemia, intracellular shifting of calcium-induced hypocalcemia, intracellular acidosis, and impaired oxygen delivery ^[69]. In contrast, the strategies for tissue perfusion improvement (proper respiratory support, and adjusted normal saline volume with other balance solutions) should be considered. Tris-hydroxy-methyl aminomethane (THAM), a weak base with intracellular diffusion that is excreted through the kidneys, is mentioned to reduce intracellular acidosis but causes hyperkalemia, hypoglycemia, pseudo hyponatremia, and an increased osmole gap, especially in patients with pre-existing renal dysfunction ^[70]. Because the reduced vascular tone is a major cause of hypotension and renal injury in sepsis, norepinephrine restores the normal capillary velocity, filtration pressure, mean arterial pressure, and increases renal medullary circulation without renal blood flow alteration, leading to improved renal function, using as the first-line drug for septic shock.

For the rapid reversal of AKI (due to direct toxins, hypotension and hypovolemia of leptospirosis), topics of renal replacement therapy (RRT); indications, timing, modality, and delivered dose should be applied. Accordingly, the common RRT indications, “A-E-I-O-U”; Acidosis, Electrolyte disturbance, Intoxication, fluid Overload, and Uremia should be used as severe metabolic acidosis, fluid overload, and uremia are the top three RRT indications in leptospirosis. For RRT modality, daily dialysis may provide superior outcomes to alternate-day dialysis in severe leptospirosis (Weil’s syndrome) ^[71] and extracorporeal blood purification (absorption therapy with polymyxin B or other cytokine absorbents) might be beneficial ^[72], especially for the hemodynamic improvement ^[73], but are still inconclusive. Therefore, the proper biomarkers for several aspects (i.e., stress, injury, functional loss, and recovery) for a proper selection of treatment methods are urgently needed. Among them, the base excess (BE) that is lower than −5 might be associated with the success of renal support discontinuation(unpublished data). On the other hand, in leptospirosis-related acute liver failure, extracorporeal support systems do not demonstrate any survival advantage in clinical studies and renal support is not recommended in AKI-superimposed chronic liver injury ^[74]. Nevertheless, renal support may be considered only in patients with reversible causes ^[75].

References

Seguro, A.C.; Lomar, A.V.; Rocha, A.S. Acute renal failure of leptospirosis: Nonoliguric and hypokalemic forms. Nephron 1990, 55, 146–151.
Fogelberg, K.; Ferrell, S.T. Vasculitis secondary to presumptive leptospirosis treated with long-term corticosteroids in a captive lesser kudu (Tragelaphus imberbis australis). J. Zoo. Wildl. Med. 2010, 41, 542–544.
George, P. Two uncommon manifestations of leptospirosis: Sweet’s syndrome and central nervous system vasculitis. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2011, 4, 83–84.
Panagopoulos, P.; Terzi, I.; Karanikas, M.; Galanopoulos, N.; Maltezos, E. Myocarditis, pancreatitis, polyarthritis, mononeuritis multiplex and vasculitis with symmetrical peripheral gangrene of the lower extremities as a rare presentation of leptospirosis: A case report and review of the literature. J. Med. Case Rep. 2014, 8, 150.
Yücel Koçak, S.; Kudu, A.; Kayalar, A.; Yilmaz, M.; Apaydin, S. Leptospirosis with acute renal failure and vasculitis: A case report. Arch. Rheumatol. 2018, 34, 229–232.
Yang, C.W.; Pan, M.J.; Wu, M.S.; Chen, Y.M.; Tsen, Y.T.; Lin, C.L.; Wu, C.H.; Huang, C.C. Leptospirosis: An ignored cause of acute renal failure in Taiwan. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 1997, 30, 840–845.
Lin, C.L.; Wu, M.S.; Yang, C.W.; Huang, C.C. Leptospirosis associated with hypokalaemia and thick ascending limb dysfunction. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 1999, 14, 193–195.
Cerqueira, T.B.; Athanazio, D.A.; Spichler, A.S.; Seguro, A.C. Renal involvement in leptospirosis—New insights into pathophysiology and treatment. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2008, 12, 248–252.
Araujo, E.R.; Seguro, A.C.; Spichler, A.; Magaldi, A.J.; Volpini, R.A.; De Brito, T. Acute kidney injury in human leptospirosis: An immunohistochemical study with pathophysiological correlation. Virchows Arch. 2010, 456, 367–375.
Sitprija, V. Altered fluid, electrolyte and mineral status in tropical disease, with an emphasis on malaria and leptospirosis. Nat. Clin. Pract. Nephrol. 2008, 4, 91–101.
Andrade, L.; Rodrigues, A.C.; Sanches, T.R., Jr.; Souza, R.B.; Seguro, A.C. Leptospirosis leads to dysregulation of sodium transporters in the kidney and lung. Am. J. Physiol. Renal. Physiol. 2007, 292, F586–F592.
Wu, M.S.; Yang, C.W.; Pan, M.J.; Chang, C.T.; Chen, Y.C. Reduced renal Na+-K+-Cl- co-transporter activity and inhibited NKCC2 mRNA expression by Leptospira shermani: From bedside to bench. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2004, 19, 2472–2479.
Khositseth, S.; Sudjaritjan, N.; Tananchai, P.; Ong-ajyuth, S.; Sitprija, V.; Thongboonkerd, V. Renal magnesium wasting and tubular dysfunction in leptospirosis. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2008, 23, 952–958.
El Hasbani, G.; Farooqui, S.R.; Kofahi, A.; Saeed, Y.; Tayeh, O.; Abu-Hishmeh, M.; Moran, H.; Troya-Maldonado, M.; Khanna, R.; Assaker, J.P.; et al. Unusual presentation of urban leptospirosis complicated by a septic shock. IDCases 2019, 17, e00574.
Bourquin, V.; Ponte, B.; Hirschel, B.; Pugin, J.; Martin, P.Y.; Saudan, P. Severe leptospirosis with multiple organ failure successfully treated by plasma exchange and high-volume hemofiltration. Case Rep. Nephrol. 2011, 2011, 817414.
Marshall, R.B. The route of entry of leptospires into the kidney tubule. J. Med. Microbiol. 1976, 9, 149–152.
Yang, C.W.; Wu, M.S.; Pan, M.J.; Hsieh, W.J.; Vandewalle, A.; Huang, C.C. The Leptospira outer membrane protein LipL32 induces tubulointerstitial nephritis-mediated gene expression in mouse proximal tubule cells. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2002, 13, 2037–2045.
Panpetch, W.; Chancharoenthana, W.; Bootdee, K.; Nilgate, S.; Finkelman, M.; Tumwasorn, S.; Leelahavanichkul, A. Lactobacillus rhamnosus L34 attenuates gut translocation-induced bacterial sepsis in murine models of leaky gut. Infect. Immun. 2017, 86, e00700–e00717.
Ondee, T.; Gillen, J.; Visitchanakun, P.; Somparn, P.; Issara-Amphorn, J.; Dang Phi, C.; Chancharoenthana, W.; Gurusamy, D.; Nita-Lazar, A.; Leelahavanichkul, A. Lipocalin-2 (Lcn-2) attenuates polymicrobial sepsis with LPS preconditioning (LPS tolerance) in FcGRIIb deficient lupus mice. Cells 2019, 8, 1064.
Yang, C.W.; Wu, M.S.; Pan, M.J.; Hong, J.J.; Yu, C.C.; Vandewalle, A.; Huang, C.C. Leptospira outer membrane protein activates NF-kappaB and downstream genes expressed in medullary thick ascending limb cells. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2000, 11, 2017–2026.
Haake, D.A.; Chao, G.; Zuerner, R.L.; Barnett, J.K.; Barnett, D.; Mazel, M.; Matsunaga, J.; Levett, P.N.; Bolin, C.A. The leptospiral major outer membrane protein LipL32 is a lipoprotein expressed during mammalian infection. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68, 2276–2285.
Lee, S.H.; Kim, K.A.; Park, Y.G.; Seong, I.W.; Kim, M.J.; Lee, Y.J. Identification and partial characterization of a novel hemolysin from Leptospira interrogans serovar lai. Gene 2000, 254, 19–28.
Yang, C.W.; Hung, C.C.; Wu, M.S.; Tian, Y.C.; Chang, C.T.; Pan, M.J.; Vandewalle, A. Toll-like receptor 2 mediates early inflammation by leptospiral outer membrane proteins in proximal tubule cells. Kidney Int. 2006, 69, 815–822.
Li, S.; Wang, M.; Ojcius, D.M.; Zhou, B.; Hu, W.; Liu, Y.; Ma, Q.; Tang, G.; Wang, D.; Yan, J. Leptospira interrogans infection leads to IL-1β and IL-18 secretion from a human macrophage cell line through reactive oxygen species and cathepsin B mediated-NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Microbes Infect. 2018, 20, 254–260.
Mariathasan, S.; Monack, D.M. Inflammasome adaptors and sensors: Intracellular regulators of infection and inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2007, 7, 31–40.
Wang, H.; Wu, Y.; Ojcius, D.M.; Yang, X.F.; Zhang, C.; Ding, S.; Lin, X.; Yan, J. Leptospiral hemolysins induce proinflammatory cytokines through Toll-like receptor 2-and 4-mediated JNK and NF-κB signaling pathways. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e42266.
Fan, J.; Xie, K.; Wang, L.; Zheng, N.; Yu, X. Roles of inflammasomes in inflammatory kidney diseases. Mediat. Inflamm. 2019, 2019, 2923072.
Yang, C.W. Leptospirosis renal disease: Understanding the initiation by Toll-like receptors. Kidney Int. 2007, 72, 918–925.
Hotchkiss, R.S.; Coopersmith, C.M.; Karl, I.E. Prevention of lymphocyte apoptosis—A potential treatment of sepsis? Clin. Infect. Dis. 2005, 41 (Suppl. 7), S465–S469.
Raffray, L.; Giry, C.; Vandroux, D.; Kuli, B.; Randrianjohany, A.; Pequin, A.M.; Renou, F.; Jaffar-Bandjee, M.C.; Gasque, P. Major neutrophilia observed in acute phase of human leptospirosis is not associated with increased expression of granulocyte cell activation markers. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0165716.
Adiga, D.; Mittal, S.; Venugopal, H.; Mittal, S. Serial changes in complete blood counts in patients with leptospirosis: Our experience. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2017, 11, EC21–EC24.
Tian, Y.C.; Chen, Y.C.; Hung, C.C.; Chang, C.T.; Wu, M.S.; Phillips, A.O.; Yang, C.W. Leptospiral outer membrane protein induces extracellular matrix accumulation through a TGF-beta1/Smad-dependent pathway. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2006, 17, 2792–2798.
Tian, Y.C.; Hung, C.C.; Li, Y.J.; Chen, Y.C.; Chang, M.Y.; Yen, T.H.; Hsu, H.H.; Wu, M.S.; Phillips, A.; Yang, C.W. Leptospira santorosai Serovar Shermani detergent extract induces an increase in fibronectin production through a Toll-like receptor 2-mediated pathway. Infect. Immun. 2011, 79, 1134–1142.
Fanton d’Andon, M.; Quellard, N.; Fernandez, B.; Ratet, G.; Lacroix-Lamandé, S.; Vandewalle, A.; Boneca, I.G.; Goujon, J.M.; Werts, C. Leptospira Interrogans induces fibrosis in the mouse kidney through Inos-dependent, TLR- and NLR-independent signaling pathways. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014, 8, e2664.
Carrillo-Larco, R.M.; Altez-Fernandez, C.; Acevedo-Rodriguez, J.G.; Ortiz-Acha, K.; Ugarte-Gil, C. Leptospirosis as a risk factor for chronic kidney disease: A systematic review of observational studies. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007458.
Herath, N.J.; Kularatne, S.A.; Weerakoon, K.G.; Wazil, A.; Subasinghe, N.; Ratnatunga, N.V. Long term outcome of acute kidney injury due to leptospirosis? A longitudinal study in Sri Lanka. BMC Res. Notes 2014, 7, 398.
Costa, F.; Hagan, J.E.; Calcagno, J.; Kane, M.; Torgerson, P.; Martinez-Silveira, M.S.; Stein, C.; Abela-Ridder, B.; Ko, A.I. Global morbidity and mortality of leptospirosis: A systematic Review. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0003898.
Yang, H.Y.; Yen, T.H.; Lin, C.Y.; Chen, Y.C.; Pan, M.J.; Lee, C.H.; Yu, C.C.; Wu, M.S.; Wu, S.S.; Weng, C.H.; et al. Early identification of leptospirosis as an ignored cause of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Shock 2012, 38, 24–29.
Picardeau, M.; Bertherat, E.; Jancloes, M.; Skouloudis, A.N.; Durski, K.; Hartskeerl, R.A. Rapid tests for diagnosis of leptospirosis: Current tools and emerging technologies. Diag. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2014, 78, 1–8.
Levett, P.N. Leptospirosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2001, 14, 296–326.
Budihal, S.V.; Perwez, K. Leptospirosis diagnosis: Competancy of various laboratory tests. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2014, 8, 199–202.
Faine, S.; World Health Organization. Guidelines for the Control of Leptospirosis; WHO Offset; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1982; Volume 67, pp. 99–171. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/37219 (accessed on 1 February 2022).
Ellis, W.; Montgomery, J.; Cassells, J. Dihydrostreptomycin treatment of bovine carriers of Leptospira interrogans serovar Hardjo. Res. Vet. Sci. 1985, 39, 292–295.
Hornsby, R.L.; Alt, D.P.; Nally, J.E. Isolation and propagation of leptospires at 37 °C directly from the mammalian host. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 9620.
Goris, M.G.; Boer, K.R.; Duarte, T.A.; Kliffen, S.J.; Hartskeerl, R.A. Human leptospirosis trends, the Netherlands, 1925–2008. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 371–378.
Wilson, M.R.; Naccache, S.N.; Samayoa, E.; Biagtan, M.; Bashir, H.; Yu, G.; Salamat, S.M.; Somasekar, S.; Federman, S.; Miller, S.; et al. Actionable diagnosis of neuroleptospirosis by next-generation sequencing. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 2408–2417.
Villumsen, S.; Pedersen, R.; Krogfelt, K.A.; Jensen, J.S. Expanding the diagnostic use of PCR in leptospirosis: Improved method for DNA extraction from blood cultures. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e12095.
Merien, F.; Portnoi, D.; Bourhy, P.; Charavay, F.; Berlioz-Arthaud, A.; Baranton, G. A rapid and quantitative method for the detection of Leptospira species in human leptospirosis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2005, 249, 139–147.
Pérez, L.J.; Lanka, S.; DeShambo, V.J.; Fredrickson, R.L.; Maddox, C.W. A Validated multiplex real-time PCR assay for the diagnosis of infectious Leptospira spp.: A novel assay for the detection and differentiation of strains from both pathogenic groups I and II. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 457.
Blanco, R.M.; Romero, E.C. Evaluation of nested polymerase chain reaction for the early detection of Leptospira spp. DNA in serum samples from patients with leptospirosis. Diag. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2014, 78, 343–346.
Jouglard, S.D.; Simionatto, S.; Seixas, F.K.; Nassi, F.L.; Dellagostin, O.A. Nested polymerase chain reaction for detection of pathogenic leptospires. Can. J. Microbiol. 2006, 52, 747–752.
Gasem, M.H.; Hadi, U.; Alisjahbana, B.; Tjitra, E.; Hapsari, M.; Lestari, E.S.; Aman, A.T.; Lokida, D.; Salim, G.; Kosasih, H.; et al. Leptospirosis in Indonesia: Diagnostic challenges associated with atypical clinical manifestations and limited laboratory capacity. BMC Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 179.
Widiasih, D.A.; Lindahl, J.F.; Artama, W.T.; Sutomo, A.H.; Kutanegara, P.M.; Mulyani, G.T.; Widodo, E.; Djohan, T.S.; Unger, F. Leptospirosis in ruminants in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: A serological survey with mixed methods to identify risk factors. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2021, 6, 84.
Koizumi, N.; Nakajima, C.; Harunari, T.; Tanikawa, T.; Tokiwa, T.; Uchimura, E.; Furuya, T.; Mingala, C.N.; Villanueva, M.A.; Ohnishi, M.; et al. A new loop-mediated isothermal amplification method for rapid, simple, and sensitive detection of Leptospira spp. in urine. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 2072–2074.
Agampodi, S.B.; Vinetz, J.M. Next-generation sequencing analysis of pathogenic leptospira: A way forward for understanding infectious disease dynamics in low/middle-income, disease-endemic settings. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2021, 104, 1625–1627.
Musso, D.; La Scola, B. Laboratory diagnosis of leptospirosis: A challenge. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2013, 46, 245–252.
Marquez, A.; Djelouadji, Z.; Lattard, V.; Kodjo, A. Overview of laboratory methods to diagnose Leptospirosis and to identify and to type leptospires. Int. Microbiol. 2017, 20, 184–193.
Goris, M.G.; Leeflang, M.M.; Loden, M.; Wagenaar, J.F.; Klatser, P.R.; Hartskeerl, R.A.; Boer, K.R. Prospective evaluation of three rapid diagnostic tests for diagnosis of human leptospirosis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2290.
OiE Terrestrial Manual. Chapter 3.1.12. Leptospirosis. Available online: https://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/fr/Health_standards/tahm/3.01.12_LEPTO.pdf (accessed on 1 February 2022).
Bal, A.E.; Gravekamp, C.; Hartskeerl, R.A.; De Meza-Brewster, J.; Korver, H.; Terpstra, W.J. Detection of leptospires in urine by PCR for early diagnosis of leptospirosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1994, 32, 1894–1898.
Ganoza, C.A.; Matthias, M.A.; Saito, M.; Cespedes, M.; Gotuzzo, E.; Vinetz, J.M. Asymptomatic renal colonization of humans in the peruvian Amazon by Leptospira. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2010, 4, e612.
Sukmark, T.; Lumlertgul, N.; Peerapornratana, S.; Khositrangsikun, K.; Tungsanga, K.; Sitprija, V.; Srisawat, N.; Thai-Lepto AKI study group. Thai-Lepto-on-admission probability (THAI-LEPTO) score as an early tool for initial diagnosis of leptospirosis: Result from Thai-Lepto AKI study group. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018, 12, e0006319.
Panaphut, T.; Domrongkitchaiporn, S.; Vibhagool, A.; Thinkamrop, B.; Susaengrat, W. Ceftriaxone compared with sodium penicillin G for treatment of severe leptospirosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003, 36, 1507–1513.
Brett-Major, D.M.; Coldren, R. Antibiotics for leptospirosis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012, 2, CD008264.
Evans, L.; Rhodes, A.; Alhazzani, W.; Antonelli, M.; Coopersmith, C.M.; French, C.; Machado, F.R.; Mcintyre, L.; Ostermann, M.; Prescott, H.C.; et al. Executive summary: Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for the Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. Crit. Care Med. 2021, 49, 1974–1982.
Mallat, J.; Meddour, M.; Durville, E.; Lemyze, M.; Pepy, F.; Temime, J.; Vangrunderbeeck, N.; Tronchon, L.; Thevenin, D.; Tavernier, B. Decrease in pulse pressure and stroke volume variations after mini-fluid challenge accurately predicts fluid responsiveness. Br. J. Anaesth. 2015, 115, 449–456.
Murugan, R.; Kellum, J.A. Fluid balance and outcome in acute kidney injury: Is fluid really the best medicine? Crit. Care Med. 2012, 40, 1970–1972.
Kellum, J.A.; Bellomo, R.; Kramer, D.J.; Pinsky, M.R. Etiology of metabolic acidosis during saline resuscitation in endotoxemia. Shock 1998, 9, 364–368.
Kraut, J.A.; Madias, N.E. Lactic acidosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 371, 2309–2319.
Hoste, E.A.; Colpaert, K.; Vanholder, R.C.; Lameire, N.H.; De Waele, J.J.; Blot, S.I.; Colardyn, F.A. Sodium bicarbonate versus THAM in ICU patients with mild metabolic acidosis. J. Nephrol. 2005, 18, 303–307.
Andrade, L.; Cleto, S.; Seguro, A.C. Door-to-dialysis time and daily hemodialysis in patients with leptospirosis: Impact on mortality. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2007, 2, 739–744.
Chancharoenthana, W.; Tiranathanagul, K.; Srisawat, N.; Susantitaphong, P.; Leelahavanichkul, A.; Praditpornsilpa, K.; Tungsanga, K.; Eiam-Ong, S. Enhanced vascular endothelial growth factor and inflammatory cytokine removal with online hemodiafiltration over high-flux hemodialysis in sepsis-related acute kidney injury patients. Ther. Apher. Dial. 2013, 17, 557–563.
Phu, N.H.; Hien, T.T.; Mai, N.T.; Chau, T.T.; Chuong, L.V.; Loc, P.P.; Winearls, C.; Farrar, J.; White, N.; Day, N. Hemofiltration and peritoneal dialysis in infection-associated acute renal failure in Vietnam. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 347, 895–902.
Chancharoenthana, W.; Leelahavanichkul, A. Acute kidney injury spectrum in patients with chronic liver disease: Where do we stand? World J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 25, 3684–3703.
Nadim, M.K.; Kellum, J.A.; Davenport, A.; Wong, F.; Davis, C.; Pannu, N.; Tolwani, A.; Bellomo, R.; Genyk, Y.S.; ADQI Workgroup. Hepatorenal syndrome: The 8th International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit. Care 2012, 16, R23.

© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Upload a video for this entry

Information

Subjects: Infectious Diseases

Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :

Wiwat Chancharoenthana

View Times: 1.3K

Update Date: 21 Mar 2022

Table of Contents

Video Upload Options

Confirm