Your browser does not fully support modern features. Please upgrade for a smoother experience.
Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic. For video creation, please contact our Academic Video Service.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 Jen-Kun Cheng + 2115 word(s) 2115 2021-12-13 09:28:25 |
2 The format is correct Lindsay Dong + 482 word(s) 2597 2022-02-09 03:22:43 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Academic Video Service to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Cheng, J. Bio-Scaffolds as Carriers for Nerve Injury Repair. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/19225 (accessed on 11 February 2026).
Cheng J. Bio-Scaffolds as Carriers for Nerve Injury Repair. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/19225. Accessed February 11, 2026.
Cheng, Jen-Kun. "Bio-Scaffolds as Carriers for Nerve Injury Repair" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/19225 (accessed February 11, 2026).
Cheng, J. (2022, February 08). Bio-Scaffolds as Carriers for Nerve Injury Repair. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/19225
Cheng, Jen-Kun. "Bio-Scaffolds as Carriers for Nerve Injury Repair." Encyclopedia. Web. 08 February, 2022.
Bio-Scaffolds as Carriers for Nerve Injury Repair
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/ijms222413347

Central and peripheral nerve injuries can lead to permanent paralysis and organ dysfunction. In recent years, many cell and exosome implantation techniques have been developed in an attempt to restore function after nerve injury with promising but generally unsatisfactory clinical results. Clinical outcome may be enhanced by bio-scaffolds specifically fabricated to provide the appropriate three-dimensional (3D) conduit, growth-permissive substrate, and trophic factor support required for cell survival and regeneration. In rodents, these scaffolds have been shown to promote axonal regrowth and restore limb motor function following experimental spinal cord or sciatic nerve injury. 

bio-scaffold biomaterial exosome nerve injury nerve regeneration

1. Introduction

Scaffolds are well-known 3D porous functional biomaterials possessing constructive characteristics such as offering the proper position of cell location, cell adhesion, and deposition of the extracellular matrix (ECM) [1]. Moreover, scaffolds allow adequate gas transport, essential nutrients, and controlling factors to promote cell proliferation, survival, and differentiation. Based on their origin, scaffolds can be broadly classified/differentiated into natural/biological (such as collagen, chitosan, glycosaminoglycans, hyaluronic acid, demineralized, or native dentin matrix, etc.) and synthetic (such as bio-ceramics, calcium phosphate, and bioactive glasses, etc.) [1]. Biopolymer-based scaffolds are useful materials for 2D and 3D cell culture [2] and drug loading [3], and have demonstrated some value for tissue regeneration in various preclinical models [4][5]. Ideal scaffolds must possess the ability to replace damaged tissues with exogenous (transplanted) or endogenous cells of the correct tissue architecture for functional restoration [6]. For example, nerve damage is common following limb or head trauma and is frequently irreversible or difficult to treat [7]. One major reason for this irreversibility is the absence of a growth-permissive environment following injury, so biocompatible scaffold materials are needed to enhance repair [8][9]. In addition to high biocompatibility [10], scaffold materials should also have tunable mechanical strength [11], a large surface area, high porosity [12], and surface properties that mimic the physical and chemical properties of the ECM [13] and lack potential biotoxicity [14] in order to promote cell-adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation [15]. The appropriate chemical environment may be provided by biomaterials that can be loaded with cells or exosomes supplying nutritive and trophic factors to the injury site (illustrated in Figure 1).

Ijms 22 13347 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of cell/exosome and bio-scaffold combinations for the treatment of central and peripheral nerve injury.

2. Natural Polymeric Scaffolds

Natural polymeric bio-scaffolds are fabricated with structural components and chemical signaling molecules that stimulate cell survival, proliferation, differentiation, and tissue reconstruction, such as neurotrophic factors and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The correct combination of factors and appropriate bioavailability is required for nerve regeneration after injury. Natural polymers used as structural components include various polysaccharides such as alginate, hyaluronic acid, chitin, and chitosan, and polymeric proteins such as gelatin, collagen, silk fibroin, fibrin, and keratin [16][17]. All of the polymers have excellent biocompatibility and bioactive properties and so may allow for better scaffold–tissue interactions as well as cell adhesion, proliferation, and eventual tissue restoration [18]. However, some lack the biophysical characteristics for functional recovery.

2.1. Polysaccharide-Based Biomaterials

2.1.1. Hyaluronic Acid

Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a glycosaminoglycan component of ECM that facilitates the interactions of cells with other extracellular molecules to promote various physiological processes [19].
HA has been used successfully with different substrates to support neurite out-growth, differentiation, and proliferation. Further, HA hydrogel has been used to promote the survival and proliferation of neural precursors for PNS repair [20] and has shown promise for CNS repair. It has mechanical properties suitable for supporting neural progenitor cell differentiation as potential neurodegenerative disease treatments [21]. Long-chain HA is essential for supporting ECM components of different molecular weights in vivo [22]. An HA scaffold containing ciliary neurotrophic factor stimulated endogenous neurogenesis and facilitated neural-network formation, synaptogenesis, and motor recovery following T8 spinal cord transection in rodents [23].

2.1.2. Alginate

Alginate, an extract of brown seaweed, is used for a variety of biomedical applications. Its chemical composition of guluronic and mannuronic acid confers greater chemical flexibility compared to other biocompatible degradable materials and may more closely mimic the physical properties of mammalian ECM [24]. Physical and mechanical properties are also easily adjustable using various chemical reactions [25] and physical crosslinking using Ca2+ with negligible immunogenicity [26]. While alginate can promote nerve regeneration under certain conditions, mechanical strength is insufficient to allow physical loading, and degradation is relatively rapid, necessitating the addition of other polymers [27][28][29].

2.1.3. Chitosan and Chitin

Chitin is the most abundant linear polysaccharide homo-polymer of the glycosaminoglycan N-acetyl-D-glucosamine in crustacean shells. Chitosan-silk hydrogel as a carrier for gingival MSC-derived exosomes was reported to accelerate neurogenesis, angiogenesis, re-epithelization, and collagen formation [30]. In a mouse hind-limb repair model as well, animals receiving MSC exosomes encapsulated with chitosan exhibited better angiogenesis and tissue regeneration than controls [31].
Chitosan is also commonly used to support axon regrowth [32] and reduce scar tissue formation [33] for peripheral nerve regeneration. Further, both reabsorbing chitosan and its degradation products (chito-oligosaccharides) have been shown to promote nerve regeneration [34]. Using appropriate fabrication techniques, chitosan nerve guidance conduits can be produced for cell-based therapies [35][36].

3. Protein-Based Biomaterials for Nerve Injuries

3.1. Collagen

Collagen scaffolds have numerous advantages for tissue engineering [37]. Collagen is a good medium for cell and drug delivery [38] and is sufficiently flexible for nerve conduits with physical features tailored for different sections of the nerve pathway [39]. In addition, it can support topographical cues that allow axonal regrowth and facilitate cell-adhesion, survival, and migration along different nerve tract domains [40]. Such collagen nerve conduits have been demonstrated to support nerve regeneration and re-innervation of muscle [41]. In a clinical study, a conduit made by mixing type I and III collagen filled with collagen filaments was effective as an autologous implant for treating nerve injury, with 75% of patients reporting sensory recovery after 12 months [42]. A collagen scaffold embedded with neural stem cells was also reported to promote nerve regeneration and motor function in a T8 SCI rat model [43].

3.2. Laminin

Laminins are high molecular weight proteins that constitute the major component of the ECM basal lamina layer, a protein network that acts as a structural foundation for most organs and cells. Laminin proteins are also a major component of the brain ECM and function as cell adhesion molecules influencing cell survival, differentiation, and plasticity. For instance, laminins were shown to promote the survival and differentiation of transplanted dopaminergic neuron precursors by suppressing cell death-associated protein [44]. Additionally, laminin present in the vascular basal lamina can act as a conduit for the growth of axons [45] as it is expressed endogenously in the basal membrane surrounding peripheral nerves, capillaries, and skeletal muscle. Further, it can regulate the proliferation, differentiation, and myelin production of Schwann cells. Laminins are also secreted by Schwann cells at lesion sites [46], strongly suggesting functions in nerve repair. For these reasons, laminins are considered promising scaffold components for nerve repair [47][48]. Indeed, nerve guides filled with laminin yielded enhanced axonal regeneration [49], likely by increasing the interactions with integrin receptors.

3.3. Gelatin

Gelatin-based hydrogels may have low viscosity at physiological temperature, limiting the maintenance of the 3D structure. To increase its strength, gelatin is combined with other polymers, such as collagen, fibrin, or various synthetic and photo-crosslinkable polymers [50][51]. Though different kinds of gelatin-based hydrogels such as micro- and nano-sized particles, nanofibrous scaffolds, enzyme-mediated, and in situ-generated gelatin hydrogels were reported [52]; the enzymatically prepared gelatin hydrogels have been widely used in nerve regeneration. For instance, the enzymatically prepared gelatin hydrogels combined with human umbilical cord MSCs have been effectively applied for nerve injury treatment [53][54].

3.4. Silk Fibroin

Silk fibroin (SF) is a natural biopolymer with high biocompatibility [55] and low immunogenicity [56] as well as sufficient biodegradability [57], physical strength, and flexibility for in vivo applications [58]. SF has been shown to promote cell attachment and survival for tissue repair and restoration [59]. Further, SF can promote proliferation of Schwann cells [60] and so may be especially effective for peripheral nerve regeneration. In addition, an SF-based hydrogel was also demonstrated to support neuronal growth for central nerve tissue repair [61]. Critically, the orientation of SF fibers can guide the direction of neuronal growth [62]. These unique properties may explain the efficacy of SF fibers for promoting neural cell proliferation following auto- or allo-grafting [63]. In addition, SF can deliver bioactive compounds to the injury site and reduce both tissue inflammation and oxidative stress. Moreover, SF fibers show slow biodegradation [64]. In a traumatic brain injury model, SF reduced brain damage and promoted neurological function [65].
SF scaffolds can be synthesized in various conformations such as fibers, mats, films, and hydrogels. This adaptability may permit its application for the treatment of several neurogenerative diseases in addition to traumatic nerve injury. Due to its unique physico-chemical and biological properties, SF is a promising material for tissue engineering. Recently, SF 3D-scaffolds enriched in MSC-derived exosomes were also reported to enhance bone regeneration in rats [66].

3.5. Fibrin

Fibrin is a fibrillary protein formed during blood clotting. It is mainly involved in hemostasis, but also contributes to wound healing by forming a temporary matrix surrounding the lesion [67]. Changes in the fibrinogen-to-thrombin ratio can modulate the mechanical properties of fibrin hydrogels for effective treatment of human spinal cord injury [68]. Due to its high biocompatibility, fibrin has been used as a vehicle and injectable biomaterial for transplantation of cells to facilitate neural regeneration [69]. The mechanical properties of fibrin hydrogels are also highly tunable by altering the fibrin concentration and preparation temperature [70].

3.6. Keratin

Keratin can be extracted from human hair and further processed to obtain a keratin sponge structure. Compared to many synthetic polymers, keratin appears to possess the surface hydrophilicity, biodegradability, biocompatibility, and bioactivity of an effective scaffold material. However, keratin-based biomaterials have low mechanical strength and degrade rapidly, and so are usually modified using various crosslinking agents for scaffold construction [71], while keratin alone is used primarily as a conduit filler. Keratin/alginate scaffolds have been applied successfully for tissue regeneration in vitro [72]. Furthermore, keratin has been shown to promote Schwann cell proliferation in vitro and improve nerve regeneration in vivo [73][74].

4. Self-Assembling Peptides

Self-assembling peptides (SAPs) can spontaneously form well-organized nanostructures, a property highly advantageous for a wide range of biomedical applications. For nerve injuries, SAPs have been used as biocompatible carriers to provide the appropriate 3D structure for embedded nerve cells and the release of growth factors and drugs [75]. Moreover, SAPs have been shown to provide a microenvironment conducive to cell proliferation and differentiation as well as neural-network reconstruction and functional restoration of injured nerves [76][77][78].
SAPs may be ideal building blocks for scaffolds and can also be used as soft fillers to surround harder synthetic biocompatible biopolymers. In general, the scaffold must imitate the natural biomechanical properties of the regenerating tissue and permit the cell–substrate and cell–cell interactions necessary for regrowth. Further, bio-absorption must be appropriately matched to tissue regeneration kinetics and result in little inflammation [79].

5. Three-Dimensional Printed Scaffolds

Three-dimensional (3D) bio-printing is used extensively in regenerative medicine, cancer research, and the pharmaceutical industry to fabricate structures combining cells, growth factors, and cell substrates. Three-dimensional printed scaffolds have been demonstrated to stimulate cell attachment, growth, and organization resembling nervous tissue. In addition, 3D bio-printing has been used to create scaffolds with defined porosity and inter-pore channel structure. Currently, two modes of 3D printing are used to create 3D cell-embedded scaffolds and scaffolds with supportive bio-ink. Both types can help to reconstruct the cellular structure of the original tissue. Bio-ink printing can quickly form porous 3D scaffolds encapsulating human neural stem cells able to differentiate and replace lost function and/or support the growth of other neurons and glia [80]. For example, Bociaga et al. demonstrated that bio-printing can produce scaffolds with excellent microstructural features for cell growth [81]. Moreover, these fabrication techniques have shown promise for printing tissue components such as grafts and organs. One recent study reported the development of a microsphere-loaded bio-ink to print scaffolds with neural progenitor cells (NPCs) for neural tissue repair [82], and another reported promising results using printed scaffolds for regeneration following sciatic nerve injury [83]. Some of these 3D bio-printed biomaterials are illustrated in Figure 6. In addition, recent examples of bio-scaffold applications for in vitro and in vivo nerve injury repair are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2.
Table 1. Recent in vitro studies using bio-scaffolds for nerve injury repair.
Bio-Scaffold Cell Type Disease Results Reference
PDGF-MS-containing tubular scaffold Neural progenitor Spinal cord injury Promoted both growth and migration of MUSE-NPCs [84]
3D collagen scaffold Glioma Glioma Good biocompatibility with glioma cells and able to influence gene expression and biological functions [85]
Scaffold incorporating salmon fibrin, HA, and laminin Human neural stem cells Neurovascular niche Enhanced vasculogenesis from human endothelial colony-forming cell-derived endothelial cells for cellular therapeutics [86]
Chitosan-based scaffold Radial glia Traumatic brain injury Effective cellular and growth factor delivery vehicle for cell transplantation [87]
Collagen scaffold Neural stem cells Spinal cord injury Promoted nerve regeneration and locomotor function [43]
Abbreviations: PDGF-MS: platelet-derived growth factor-microsphere; MUSE-NPCs: neural progenitor cells differentiated in vitro from multilineage-differentiating stress-enduring cells.
Table 2. Recent studies using bio-scaffolds for nerve injury repair in animal models.
Bio-Scaffold Species Disease Results Reference
Poly (propylene fumarate) polymer with collagen biomaterial Rat Spinal cord injury Promoted neurotrophy, neuroprotection, myelination, and synapse formation, and reduced CSPG deposits and fibrotic scarring [88]
3D collagen-based scaffold Mouse Neuroblastoma Promoted microenvironment within scaffold and helps in cell transplantation and drug delivery [89]
Collagen nerve conduit Rat Sciatic defect Promoted motor nerve regeneration [41]
Chitosan hydrogel scaffold Mouse Ischemic brain injury Improved tissue regeneration following hind-limb ischemia [31]
3D fibrin hydrogel scaffold Rat Spinal cord injury Promoted aligned axonal regrowth and locomotor function [90]
Collagen/heparin/VEGF scaffold Rat Traumatic brain injury Provided an excellent microenvironment for nerve regeneration [91]
Collagen scaffold Rat Spinal cord injury Improved locomotor function and nerve regeneration [43]
Silk fibroin scaffold Rat Traumatic brain injury Neuroprotection [65]
RADA16-BDNF
self-assembling peptide hydrogel scaffold		 Rat Traumatic brain injury Enhanced the growth, survival, and differentiation of MSCs by providing a favorable microenvironment [92]
Chitin scaffold Rat Sciatic nerve injury Improved sciatic nerve regeneration, myelin sheath formation, and functional recovery [93]
Keratin sponge Rat Sciatic nerve injury Regulated inflammatory cytokine release from macrophages, axon extension, and nerve regeneration [73]
Fibrin hydrogel Rat Sciatic nerve defect Promoted regeneration as well as the secretion and signaling of multiple neurotrophic factors [94]
Keratin sponge Rat Spinal cord injury Improved functional recovery and inhibition of inflammatory response through macrophage polarization [74]
Abbreviations: CSPG: chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; BDNF: brain-derived neurotrophic factor; MSCs: mesenchymal stem cells.

6. Bio-Scaffolds for Exosomes

Many studies were performed to assemble ionic cross-linking bio-scaffolds for exosome maintenance and release. In this regard, alginate hydrogel is considered one of the best bio-scaffold for encapsulating exosomes. For instance, an exosome-loaded alginate scaffold has been reported to improve collagen production, skin regeneration, and angiogenesis in the wound area [95]. In our previous study, an alginate scaffold loaded with MSC exosomes was also developed to treat nerve injury-induced pain [96].
In a sciatic nerve defect model, a chitin conduit embedded with human gingiva MSC-derived exosomes were found to promote Schwann cell proliferation and axon growth from the dorsal root ganglion [97]. In addition, this scaffold increased the number and diameter of nerve fibers and enhanced myelin formation, nerve transmission, and motor function. In another SCI model, exosomes embedded within peptide-modified hydrogel stimulated nerve regeneration and preserved urinary function [98]. Recent studies on exosome scaffolds for nerve injury repair are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3. Recent examples of exosome scaffold use in nerve injury models.
Bio-Scaffold Exosome Source Disease Results Reference
Peptide-modified adhesive hydrogel Human MSC-derived Spinal cord injury Promoted nerve regeneration and protected urinary tissue by easing oxidative stress and inflammation [98]
Alginate scaffold Human umbilical cord MSC-derived Nerve injury-induced pain Anti-nociceptive, anti-inflammatory, and neurotrophic effects [96]
Chitin conduit Human gingiva MSC-derived Rat sciatic nerve defect Increased the number and diameter of nerve fibers and promoted myelin formation [97]
Chitosan hydrogel Human placental MSC-derived Hind-limb ischemia Enhanced angiogenesis and tissue regeneration [31]
Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide 38 Retinal ganglion cell (RGC)-derived Traumatic optic neuropathy Promoted retinal ganglion cell survival and axon regeneration [99]

References

  1. Gathani, K.M.; Raghavendra, S.S. Scaffolds in regenerative endodontics: A review. Dent. Res. J. (Isfahan) 2016, 13, 379–386.
  2. Huang, L.; Abdalla, A.M.E.; Xiao, L.; Yang, G. Biopolymer-Based Microcarriers for Three-Dimensional Cell Culture and Engineered Tissue Formation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1895.
  3. Chan, A.W.; Neufeld, R.J. Modeling the controllable pH-responsive swelling and pore size of networked alginate based biomaterials. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 6119–6129.
  4. Chansai, P.; Sirivat, A.; Niamlang, S.; Chotpattananont, D.; Viravaidya-Pasuwat, K. Controlled transdermal iontophoresis of sulfosalicylic acid from polypyrrole/poly(acrylic acid) hydrogel. Int. J. Pharm. 2009, 381, 25–33.
  5. Pérez-Pedroza, R.; Ávila-Ramírez, A.; Khan, Z.; Moretti, M.; Hauser, C.A.E. Supramolecular Biopolymers for Tissue Engineering. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2021, 2021, 8815006.
  6. Wei, S.; Ma, J.-X.; Xu, L.; Gu, X.-S.; Ma, X.-L. Biodegradable materials for bone defect repair. Mil. Med. Res. 2020, 7, 54.
  7. Mammadov, B.; Sever, M.; Gecer, M.; Zor, F.; Ozturk, S.; Akgun, H.; Ulas, U.H.; Orhan, Z.; Guler, M.O.; Tekinay, A.B. Sciatic nerve regeneration induced by glycosaminoglycan and laminin mimetic peptide nanofiber gels. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 110535–110547.
  8. Wang, L.; Wang, C.; Wu, S.; Fan, Y.; Li, X. Influence of the mechanical properties of biomaterials on degradability, cell behaviors and signaling pathways: Current progress and challenges. Biomater. Sci. 2020, 8, 2714–2733.
  9. Dong, R.; Ma, P.X.; Guo, B. Conductive biomaterials for muscle tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2020, 229, 119584.
  10. Yadav, P.; Yadav, H.; Shah, V.G.; Shah, G.; Dhaka, G. Biomedical Biopolymers, their Origin and Evolution in Biomedical Sciences: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. JCDR 2015, 9, ZE21–ZE25.
  11. Sampath, U.G.T.M.; Ching, Y.C.; Chuah, C.H.; Sabariah, J.J.; Lin, P.-C. Fabrication of Porous Materials from Natural/Synthetic Biopolymers and Their Composites. Materials 2016, 9, 991.
  12. Moradali, M.F.; Rehm, B.H.A. Bacterial biopolymers: From pathogenesis to advanced materials. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 195–210.
  13. Brovold, M.; Almeida, J.I.; Pla-Palacín, I.; Sainz-Arnal, P.; Sánchez-Romero, N.; Rivas, J.J.; Almeida, H.; Dachary, P.R.; Serrano-Aulló, T.; Soker, S.; et al. Naturally-Derived Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Applications. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018, 1077, 421–449.
  14. Bressan, E.; Ferroni, L.; Gardin, C.; Bellin, G.; Sbricoli, L.; Sivolella, S.; Brunello, G.; Schwartz-Arad, D.; Mijiritsky, E.; Penarrocha, M.; et al. Metal Nanoparticles Released from Dental Implant Surfaces: Potential Contribution to Chronic Inflammation and Peri-Implant Bone Loss. Materials 2019, 12, 2036.
  15. Liu, J.; Cheng, F.; Grénman, H.; Spoljaric, S.; Seppälä, J.; Eriksson, J.E.; Willför, S.; Xu, C. Development of nanocellulose scaffolds with tunable structures to support 3D cell culture. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 148, 259–271.
  16. Arslantunali, D.; Dursun, T.; Yucel, D.; Hasirci, N.; Hasirci, V. Peripheral nerve conduits: Technology update. Med. Devices (Auckl. N. Z.) 2014, 7, 405–424.
  17. Raza, C.; Riaz, H.A.; Anjum, R.; Shakeel, N.u.A. Repair strategies for injured peripheral nerve: Review. Life Sci. 2020, 243, 117308.
  18. de Queiroz Antonino, R.S.C.M.; Lia Fook, B.R.P.; de Oliveira Lima, V.A.; de Farias Rached, R.Í.; Lima, E.P.N.; da Silva Lima, R.J.; Peniche Covas, C.A.; Lia Fook, M.V. Preparation and Characterization of Chitosan Obtained from Shells of Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei Boone). Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 141.
  19. Hemshekhar, M.; Thushara, R.M.; Chandranayaka, S.; Sherman, L.S.; Kemparaju, K.; Girish, K.S. Emerging roles of hyaluronic acid bioscaffolds in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 86, 917–928.
  20. Thomas, R.C.; Vu, P.; Modi, S.P.; Chung, P.E.; Landis, R.C.; Khaing, Z.Z.; Hardy, J.G.; Schmidt, C.E. Sacrificial Crystal Templated Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels As Biomimetic 3D Tissue Scaffolds for Nerve Tissue Regeneration. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 3, 1451–1459.
  21. Yang, R.; Xu, C.; Wang, T.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Quan, D.; Deng, D.Y.B. PTMAc-PEG-PTMAc hydrogel modified by RGDC and hyaluronic acid promotes neural stem cells’ survival and differentiation in vitro. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 41098–41104.
  22. Zarei-Kheirabadi, M.; Sadrosadat, H.; Mohammadshirazi, A.; Jaberi, R.; Sorouri, F.; Khayyatan, F.; Kiani, S. Human embryonic stem cell-derived neural stem cells encapsulated in hyaluronic acid promotes regeneration in a contusion spinal cord injured rat. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 148, 1118–1129.
  23. Xie, Y.; Song, W.; Zhao, W.; Gao, Y.; Shang, J.; Hao, P.; Yang, Z.; Duan, H.; Li, X. Application of the sodium hyaluronate-CNTF scaffolds in repairing adult rat spinal cord injury and facilitating neural network formation. Sci. China Life Sci. 2018, 61, 559–568.
  24. Kim, M.S.; Kim, G. Three-dimensional electrospun polycaprolactone (PCL)/alginate hybrid composite scaffolds. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 114, 213–221.
  25. Dranseikiene, D.; Schrüfer, S.; Schubert, D.W.; Reakasame, S.; Boccaccini, A.R. Cell-laden alginate dialdehyde–gelatin hydrogels formed in 3D printed sacrificial gel. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2020, 31, 31.
  26. Sun, J.; Tan, H. Alginate-Based Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine Applications. Materials 2013, 6, 1285–1309.
  27. Golafshan, N.; Kharaziha, M.; Fathi, M. Tough and conductive hybrid graphene-PVA: Alginate fibrous scaffolds for engineering neural construct. Carbon 2017, 111, 752–763.
  28. Homaeigohar, S.; Tsai, T.-Y.; Young, T.-H.; Yang, H.J.; Ji, Y.-R. An electroactive alginate hydrogel nanocomposite reinforced by functionalized graphite nanofilaments for neural tissue engineering. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 224, 115112.
  29. Chen, S.; Zhao, Y.; Yan, X.; Zhang, L.; Li, G.; Yang, Y. PAM/GO/gel/SA composite hydrogel conduit with bioactivity for repairing peripheral nerve injury. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2019, 107, 1273–1283.
  30. Shi, Q.; Qian, Z.; Liu, D.; Sun, J.; Wang, X.; Liu, H.; Xu, J.; Guo, X. GMSC-Derived Exosomes Combined with a Chitosan/Silk Hydrogel Sponge Accelerates Wound Healing in a Diabetic Rat Skin Defect Model. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 904.
  31. Zhang, K.; Zhao, X.; Chen, X.; Wei, Y.; Du, W.; Wang, Y.; Liu, L.; Zhao, W.; Han, Z.; Kong, D.; et al. Enhanced Therapeutic Effects of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes with an Injectable Hydrogel for Hindlimb Ischemia Treatment. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 30081–30091.
  32. Stenberg, L.; Kodama, A.; Lindwall-Blom, C.; Dahlin, L.B. Nerve regeneration in chitosan conduits and in autologous nerve grafts in healthy and in type 2 diabetic Goto–Kakizaki rats. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2016, 43, 463–473.
  33. Neubrech, F.; Sauerbier, M.; Moll, W.; Seegmüller, J.; Heider, S.; Harhaus, L.; Bickert, B.; Kneser, U.; Kremer, T. Enhancing the Outcome of Traumatic Sensory Nerve Lesions of the Hand by Additional Use of a Chitosan Nerve Tube in Primary Nerve Repair: A Randomized Controlled Bicentric Trial. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2018, 142, 415–424.
  34. Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Gong, J.; Yang, L.; Niu, C.; Ni, X.; Wang, Y.; Peng, S.; Gu, X.; Sun, C.; et al. Chitosan degradation products facilitate peripheral nerve regeneration by improving macrophage-constructed microenvironments. Biomaterials 2017, 134, 64–77.
  35. Boido, M.; Ghibaudi, M.; Gentile, P.; Favaro, E.; Fusaro, R.; Tonda-Turo, C. Chitosan-based hydrogel to support the paracrine activity of mesenchymal stem cells in spinal cord injury treatment. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 6402.
  36. Tonda-Turo, C.; Carmagnola, I.; Chiappone, A.; Feng, Z.; Ciardelli, G.; Hakkarainen, M.; Sangermano, M. Photocurable chitosan as bioink for cellularized therapies towards personalized scaffold architecture. Bioprinting 2020, 18, e00082.
  37. Kim, Y.S.; Majid, M.; Melchiorri, A.J.; Mikos, A.G. Applications of decellularized extracellular matrix in bone and cartilage tissue engineering. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 2019, 4, 83–95.
  38. Dalamagkas, K.; Tsintou, M.; Seifalian, A. Advances in peripheral nervous system regenerative therapeutic strategies: A biomaterials approach. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 65, 425–432.
  39. Aigner, T.B.; Haynl, C.; Salehi, S.; O’Connor, A.; Scheibel, T. Nerve guidance conduit design based on self-rolling tubes. Mater. Today Bio 2020, 5, 100042.
  40. Drobnik, J.; Pietrucha, K.; Kudzin, M.; Mader, K.; Szymański, J.; Szczepanowska, A. Comparison of various types of collagenous scaffolds applied for embryonic nerve cell culture. Biologicals 2017, 46, 74–80.
  41. Saltzman, E.B.; Villa, J.C.; Doty, S.B.; Feinberg, J.H.; Lee, S.K.; Wolfe, S.W. A Comparison Between Two Collagen Nerve Conduits and Nerve Autograft: A Rat Model of Motor Nerve Regeneration. J. Hand Surg. 2019, 44, 700.e1–700.e9.
  42. Saeki, M.; Tanaka, K.; Imatani, J.; Okamoto, H.; Watanabe, K.; Nakamura, T.; Gotani, H.; Ohi, H.; Nakamura, R.; Hirata, H. Efficacy and safety of novel collagen conduits filled with collagen filaments to treat patients with peripheral nerve injury: A multicenter, controlled, open-label clinical trial. Injury 2018, 49, 766–774.
  43. Liu, S.; Xie, Y.-Y.; Wang, L.-D.; Tai, C.-X.; Chen, D.; Mu, D.; Cui, Y.-Y.; Wang, B. A multi-channel collagen scaffold loaded with neural stem cells for the repair of spinal cord injury. Neural Regen. Res. 2021, 16, 2284–2292.
  44. Zhang, D.; Yang, S.; Toledo Enrique, M.; Gyllborg, D.; Saltó, C.; Carlos Villaescusa, J.; Arenas, E. Niche-derived laminin-511 promotes midbrain dopaminergic neuron survival and differentiation through YAP. Sci. Signal. 2017, 10, eaal4165.
  45. Tran, K.A.; Partyka, P.P.; Jin, Y.; Bouyer, J.; Fischer, I.; Galie, P.A. Vascularization of self-assembled peptide scaffolds for spinal cord injury repair. Acta Biomater. 2020, 104, 76–84.
  46. Nieuwenhuis, B.; Haenzi, B.; Andrews, M.R.; Verhaagen, J.; Fawcett, J.W. Integrins promote axonal regeneration after injury of the nervous system. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2018, 93, 1339–1362.
  47. Chang, W.; Shah, M.B.; Zhou, G.; Walsh, K.; Rudraiah, S.; Kumbar, S.G.; Yu, X. Polymeric nanofibrous nerve conduits coupled with laminin for peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomed. Mater. 2020, 15, 035003.
  48. Haggerty, A.E.; Bening, M.R.; Pherribo, G.; Dauer, E.A.; Oudega, M. Laminin polymer treatment accelerates repair of the crushed peripheral nerve in adult rats. Acta Biomater. 2019, 86, 185–193.
  49. Zhang, X.-F.; Liu, H.-X.; Ortiz, L.S.; Xiao, Z.-D.; Huang, N.-P. Laminin-modified and aligned poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/polyethylene oxide nanofibrous nerve conduits promote peripheral nerve regeneration. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2018, 12, e627–e636.
  50. De la Vega, L.; Abelseth, L.; Sharma, R.; Triviño-Paredes, J.; Restan, M.; Willerth, S.M. 3D Bioprinting Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells and Drug-Releasing Microspheres to Produce Responsive Neural Tissues. Adv. NanoBiomed Res. 2021, 1, 2000077.
  51. Shin, J.H.; Kang, H.-W. The Development of Gelatin-Based Bio-Ink for Use in 3D Hybrid Bioprinting. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 2018, 19, 767–771.
  52. Echave, C.M.; Saenz del Burgo, L.; Pedraz, L.J.; Orive, G. Gelatin as Biomaterial for Tissue Engineering. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2017, 23, 3567–3584.
  53. Yao, M.; Li, J.; Zhang, J.; Ma, S.; Wang, L.; Gao, F.; Guan, F. Dual-enzymatically cross-linked gelatin hydrogel enhances neural differentiation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells and functional recovery in experimental murine spinal cord injury. J. Mater. Chem. B 2021, 9, 440–452.
  54. Li, J.; Gao, F.; Ma, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Guan, F.; Yao, M. Control the fate of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells with dual-enzymatically cross-linked gelatin hydrogels for potential applications in nerve regeneration. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2020, 14, 1261–1271.
  55. Yi, B.; Zhang, H.; Yu, Z.; Yuan, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y. Fabrication of high performance silk fibroin fibers via stable jet electrospinning for potential use in anisotropic tissue regeneration. J. Mater. Chem. B 2018, 6, 3934–3945.
  56. Luan, C.; Liu, P.; Chen, R.; Chen, B. Hydrogel based 3D carriers in the application of stem cell therapy by direct injection. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2017, 6, 435–448.
  57. Donate, R.; Monzón, M.; Alemán-Domínguez, M.E.; Ortega, Z. Enzymatic degradation study of PLA-based composite scaffolds. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2020, 59, 170–175.
  58. Chen, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Li, H.; Wei, Q.; Zhao, X.; Chen, F. Elastin-like polypeptide modified silk fibroin porous scaffold promotes osteochondral repair. Bioact. Mater. 2021, 6, 589–601.
  59. Magaz, A.; Faroni, A.; Gough, J.E.; Reid, A.J.; Li, X.; Blaker, J.J. Bioactive Silk-Based Nerve Guidance Conduits for Augmenting Peripheral Nerve Repair. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2018, 7, 1800308.
  60. Xuan, H.; Tang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Ling, J.; Yang, Y. Freestanding Hyaluronic Acid/Silk-Based Self-healing Coating toward Tissue Repair with Antibacterial Surface. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2020, 3, 1628–1635.
  61. Chen, S.; Liu, S.; Zhang, L.; Han, Q.; Liu, H.; Shen, J.; Li, G.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Y. Construction of injectable silk fibroin/polydopamine hydrogel for treatment of spinal cord injury. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 399, 125795.
  62. Zhang, L.; Xu, L.; Li, G.; Yang, Y. Fabrication of high-strength mecobalamin loaded aligned silk fibroin scaffolds for guiding neuronal orientation. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2019, 173, 689–697.
  63. Nguyen, T.P.; Nguyen, Q.V.; Nguyen, V.-H.; Le, T.-H.; Huynh, V.Q.; Vo, D.-V.N.; Trinh, Q.T.; Kim, S.Y.; Le, Q.V. Silk Fibroin-Based Biomaterials for Biomedical Applications: A Review. Polymers 2019, 11, 1933.
  64. Tang-Schomer, M.D.; Kaplan, D.L.; Whalen, M.J. Film interface for drug testing for delivery to cells in culture and in the brain. Acta Biomater. 2019, 94, 306–319.
  65. Moisenovich, M.M.; Plotnikov, E.Y.; Moysenovich, A.M.; Silachev, D.N.; Danilina, T.I.; Savchenko, E.S.; Bobrova, M.M.; Safonova, L.A.; Tatarskiy, V.V.; Kotliarova, M.S.; et al. Effect of Silk Fibroin on Neuroregeneration After Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurochem. Res. 2019, 44, 2261–2272.
  66. Kyung Kim, D.; Lee, S.; Kim, M.; Jeong, Y.; Lee, S. Exosome-coated silk fibroin 3D-scaffold for inducing osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 406, 127080.
  67. Park, C.H.; Woo, K.M. Fibrin-Based Biomaterial Applications in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. In Biomimetic Medical Materials. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Noh, I., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; Volume 1064.
  68. Karimi, A.; Shojaei, A.; Tehrani, P. Mechanical properties of the human spinal cord under the compressive loading. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 2017, 86, 15–18.
  69. Yu, Z.; Li, H.; Xia, P.; Kong, W.; Chang, Y.; Fu, C.; Wang, K.; Yang, X.; Qi, Z. Application of fibrin-based hydrogels for nerve protection and regeneration after spinal cord injury. J. Biol. Eng. 2020, 14, 22.
  70. Bruekers, S.M.C.; Jaspers, M.; Hendriks, J.M.A.; Kurniawan, N.A.; Koenderink, G.H.; Kouwer, P.H.J.; Rowan, A.E.; Huck, W.T.S. Fibrin-fiber architecture influences cell spreading and differentiation. Cell Adhes. Migr. 2016, 10, 495–504.
  71. Rajabi, M.; Ali, A.; McConnell, M.; Cabral, J. Keratinous materials: Structures and functions in biomedical applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 110, 110612.
  72. Gupta, P.; Nayak, K.K. Optimization of keratin/alginate scaffold using RSM and its characterization for tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 85, 141–149.
  73. Gao, J.; Zhang, L.; Wei, Y.; Chen, T.; Ji, X.; Ye, K.; Yu, J.; Tang, B.; Sun, X.; Hu, J. Human hair keratins promote the regeneration of peripheral nerves in a rat sciatic nerve crush model. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2019, 30, 82.
  74. Zabarsky, Z.K.; Dean, G.M.; Luo, T.D.; Marquez-Lara, A.; Jinnah, A.H.; Van Dyke, M.; Smith, T.L. Keratin Biomaterials Improve Functional Recovery in a Rat Spinal Cord Injury Model. Spine 2021, 46, 1055–1062.
  75. Samadian, H.; Maleki, H.; Fathollahi, A.; Salehi, M.; Gholizadeh, S.; Derakhshankhah, H.; Allahyari, Z.; Jaymand, M. Naturally occurring biological macromolecules-based hydrogels: Potential biomaterials for peripheral nerve regeneration. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 154, 795–817.
  76. Araújo, M.R.; Kyrylenko, S.; Spejo, A.B.; Castro, M.V.; Ferreira Junior, R.S.; Barraviera, B.; Oliveira, A.L.R. Transgenic human embryonic stem cells overexpressing FGF2 stimulate neuroprotection following spinal cord ventral root avulsion. Exp. Neurol. 2017, 294, 45–57.
  77. Celikkin, N.; Rinoldi, C.; Costantini, M.; Trombetta, M.; Rainer, A.; Święszkowski, W. Naturally derived proteins and glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 78, 1277–1299.
  78. Fan, C.; Li, X.; Xiao, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Liang, H.; Wang, B.; Han, S.; Li, X.; Xu, B.; Wang, N.; et al. A modified collagen scaffold facilitates endogenous neurogenesis for acute spinal cord injury repair. Acta Biomater. 2017, 51, 304–316.
  79. Chen, F.-M.; Liu, X. Advancing biomaterials of human origin for tissue engineering. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2016, 53, 86–168.
  80. Gu, Q.; Tomaskovic-Crook, E.; Lozano, R.; Chen, Y.; Kapsa, R.M.; Zhou, Q.; Wallace, G.G.; Crook, J.M. Functional 3D Neural Mini-Tissues from Printed Gel-Based Bioink and Human Neural Stem Cells. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2016, 5, 1429–1438.
  81. Bociaga, D.; Bartniak, M.; Grabarczyk, J.; Przybyszewska, K. Sodium Alginate/Gelatine Hydrogels for Direct Bioprinting—The Effect of Composition Selection and Applied Solvents on the Bioink Properties. Materials 2019, 12, 2669.
  82. Sharma, R.; Smits, I.P.M.; De La Vega, L.; Lee, C.; Willerth, S.M. 3D Bioprinting Pluripotent Stem Cell Derived Neural Tissues Using a Novel Fibrin Bioink Containing Drug Releasing Microspheres. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 57.
  83. Rodríguez-Sánchez, D.N.; Pinto, G.B.A.; Cartarozzi, L.P.; de Oliveira, A.L.R.; Bovolato, A.L.C.; de Carvalho, M.; da Silva, J.V.L.; de Andréa Dernowsek, J.; Golim, M.; Barraviera, B.; et al. 3D-printed nerve guidance conduits multi-functionalized with canine multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells promote neuroregeneration after sciatic nerve injury in rats. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021, 12, 303.
  84. Chen, X.; Xu, M.-L.; Wang, C.-N.; Zhang, L.-Z.; Zhao, Y.-H.; Zhu, C.-L.; Chen, Y.; Wu, J.; Yang, Y.-M.; Wang, X.-D. A partition-type tubular scaffold loaded with PDGF-releasing microspheres for spinal cord repair facilitates the directional migration and growth of cells. Neural Regen. Res. 2018, 13, 1231–1240.
  85. Jia, W.; Jiang, X.; Liu, W.; Wang, L.; Zhu, B.; Zhu, H.; Liu, X.; Zhong, M.; Xie, D.; Huang, W.; et al. Effects of three-dimensional collagen scaffolds on the expression profiles and biological functions of glioma cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2018, 52, 1787–1800.
  86. Arulmoli, J.; Wright, H.J.; Phan, D.T.T.; Sheth, U.; Que, R.A.; Botten, G.A.; Keating, M.; Botvinick, E.L.; Pathak, M.M.; Zarembinski, T.I.; et al. Combination scaffolds of salmon fibrin, hyaluronic acid, and laminin for human neural stem cell and vascular tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2016, 43, 122–138.
  87. Skop, N.B.; Calderon, F.; Cho, C.H.; Gandhi, C.D.; Levison, S.W. Optimizing a multifunctional microsphere scaffold to improve neural precursor cell transplantation for traumatic brain injury repair. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2016, 10, E419–E432.
  88. Chen, X.; Zhao, Y.; Li, X.; Xiao, Z.; Yao, Y.; Chu, Y.; Farkas, B.; Romano, I.; Brandi, F.; Dai, J. Functional Multichannel Poly(Propylene Fumarate)-Collagen Scaffold with Collagen-Binding Neurotrophic Factor 3 Promotes Neural Regeneration After Transected Spinal Cord Injury. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2018, 7, 1800315.
  89. Curtin, C.; Nolan, J.C.; Conlon, R.; Deneweth, L.; Gallagher, C.; Tan, Y.J.; Cavanagh, B.L.; Asraf, A.Z.; Harvey, H.; Miller-Delaney, S.; et al. A physiologically relevant 3D collagen-based scaffold–neuroblastoma cell system exhibits chemosensitivity similar to orthotopic xenograft models. Acta Biomater. 2018, 70, 84–97.
  90. Yao, S.; Yu, S.; Cao, Z.; Yang, Y.; Yu, X.; Mao, H.-Q.; Wang, L.-N.; Sun, X.; Zhao, L.; Wang, X. Hierarchically aligned fibrin nanofiber hydrogel accelerated axonal regrowth and locomotor function recovery in rat spinal cord injury. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018, 13, 2883–2895.
  91. Zhang, J.; Liu, X.; Ma, K.; Chen, M.; Xu, H.; Niu, X.; Gu, H.; Wang, R.; Chen, X.; Sun, H. Collagen/heparin scaffold combined with vascular endothelial growth factor promotes the repair of neurological function in rats with traumatic brain injury. Biomater. Sci. 2021, 9, 745–764.
  92. Shi, W.; Huang, C.J.; Xu, X.D.; Jin, G.H.; Huang, R.Q.; Huang, J.F.; Chen, Y.N.; Ju, S.Q.; Wang, Y.; Shi, Y.W.; et al. Transplantation of RADA16-BDNF peptide scaffold with human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells forced with CXCR4 and activated astrocytes for repair of traumatic brain injury. Acta Biomater. 2016, 45, 247–261.
  93. Wang, B.; Lu, C.F.; Liu, Z.Y.; Han, S.; Wei, P.; Zhang, D.Y.; Kou, Y.H.; Jiang, B.G. Chitin scaffold combined with autologous small nerve repairs sciatic nerve defects. Neural Regen. Res. 2022, 17, 1106–1114.
  94. Liu, Y.-J.; Chen, X.-F.; Zhou, L.-P.; Rao, F.; Zhang, D.-Y.; Wang, Y.-H. A nerve conduit filled with Wnt5a-loaded fibrin hydrogels promotes peripheral nerve regeneration. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2021.
  95. Shafei, S.; Khanmohammadi, M.; Heidari, R.; Ghanbari, H.; Taghdiri Nooshabadi, V.; Farzamfar, S.; Akbariqomi, M.; Sanikhani, N.S.; Absalan, M.; Tavoosidana, G. Exosome loaded alginate hydrogel promotes tissue regeneration in full-thickness skin wounds: An in vivo study. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2020, 108, 545–556.
  96. Hsu, J.-M.; Shiue, S.-J.; Yang, K.D.; Shiue, H.-S.; Hung, Y.-W.; Pannuru, P.; Poongodi, R.; Lin, H.-Y.; Cheng, J.-K. Locally Applied Stem Cell Exosome-Scaffold Attenuates Nerve Injury-Induced Pain in Rats. J. Pain Res. 2020, 13, 3257–3268.
  97. Rao, F.; Zhang, D.; Fang, T.; Lu, C.; Wang, B.; Ding, X.; Wei, S.; Zhang, Y.; Pi, W.; Xu, H.; et al. Exosomes from Human Gingiva-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Combined with Biodegradable Chitin Conduits Promote Rat Sciatic Nerve Regeneration. Stem Cells Int. 2019, 2019, 2546367.
  98. Li, L.; Zhang, Y.; Mu, J.; Chen, J.; Zhang, C.; Cao, H.; Gao, J. Transplantation of Human Mesenchymal Stem-Cell-Derived Exosomes Immobilized in an Adhesive Hydrogel for Effective Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 4298–4305.
  99. Wang, T.; Li, Y.; Guo, M.; Dong, X.; Liao, M.; Du, M.; Wang, X.; Yin, H.; Yan, H. Exosome-Mediated Delivery of the Neuroprotective Peptide PACAP38 Promotes Retinal Ganglion Cell Survival and Axon Regeneration in Rats With Traumatic Optic Neuropathy. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 734.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Neurosciences
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : Jen-Kun Cheng
View Times: 616
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 09 Feb 2022
Table of Contents
    Notice
    You are not a member of the advisory board for this topic. If you want to update advisory board member profile, please contact office@encyclopedia.pub.
    OK
    Confirm
    Only members of the Encyclopedia advisory board for this topic are allowed to note entries. Would you like to become an advisory board member of the Encyclopedia?
    Yes
    No
    ${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
    Submit
    Cancel
    There is no comment~
    ${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
    Submit
    Cancel
    ${ selectedItem.replyTextCharacter }/${ selectedItem.replyMaxCharacter }
    Submit
    Cancel
    Confirm
    Are you sure to Delete?
    Yes No
    Academic Video Service
    Feedback