You're using an outdated browser. Please upgrade to a modern browser for the best experience.
Glycolysis under Circadian Control
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/ijms222413666

Glycolysis is considered a main metabolic pathway in highly proliferative cells, including endothelial, epithelial, immune, and cancer cells. Although oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) is more efficient in ATP production per mole of glucose, proliferative cells rely predominantly on aerobic glycolysis, which generates ATP faster compared to OXPHOS and provides anabolic substrates to support cell proliferation and migration. Cellular metabolism, including glucose metabolism, is under strong circadian control. Circadian clocks control a wide array of metabolic processes, including glycolysis, which exhibits a distinct circadian pattern.

glycolysis metabolic reprogramming oxidative phosphorylation circadian clock genes

1. Introduction

Most cells produce the majority of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) via the metabolic pathway known as oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), which uses energy released by nutrient oxidation. OXPHOS is an enzymatic process defined as an electron transport-linked reaction coupled to the ATP synthesis through an electrochemical transmembrane gradient. This process requires a sufficient amount of oxygen [1]. Under a condition of oxygen deprivation, some of the cells are able to switch from OXPHOS to the glycolytic ATP production. An up-regulated rate of glycolysis and abundant production of glycolysis intermediates are needed for the biosynthesis of macromolecules in the pentose phosphate pathway and serine biosynthesis pathway [2].
Glycolysis is a 10-step metabolic pathway, which results in the production of pyruvate and two molecules of ATP. Each step is catalysed by a specific enzyme or a group of enzymes. Briefly, upon entering the cell, glucose is phosphorylated to glucose-6-phosphate (G6P) by the enzyme hexokinase 2 (HK2) in the first and rate-limiting reaction of glycolysis. Glucose-6-phosphate can enter the glycolytic or pentose phosphate pathway. Next, the enzyme glucose-6-phosphate isomerase catalyses the conversion of G6P to fructose-6-phosphate (F6P), which is converted to fructose-1,6-bisphosphate by the enzyme phosphofructokinase-1 (PFK-1). This enzyme uses ATP as the energy source. In the last step of glycolysis, ATP and pyruvate are produced by the enzyme pyruvate kinase [3], which catalyses the irreversible transfer of the phosphoryl group from phosphoenolpyruvate to ADP. Overall, the net products of glycolysis are two molecules of ATP, two molecules of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH), and pyruvate [3].
Glycolysis is regulated by specific enzymes; among them, 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase-3 (PFKFB3) is the most significant regulator. The PFKFB3 enzyme contributes to the synthesis of fructose-2,6-bisphosphate (F2,6P2), an allosteric activator of PFK-1 [4]. The concentration of F2,6P2 is controlled by a family of bifunctional PFKFB enzymes encoded by four genes (pfkfb 1–4). Of all PFKFB isoenzymes, the PFKFB3 has a 700-fold higher kinase than bisphosphatase activity, contributing to the production of F2,6P2 [5]. Moreover, enzyme PFKFB3 is the most abundant isoenzyme in endothelial cells and in several tumour cell lines after exposure to growth factors.
In general, healthy cells rely on OXPHOS and glycolysis for ATP production; however, the energy contribution differs depending on the cell type and cellular microenvironment. Under a normal condition of sufficient oxygen, 70% of ATP is produced in OXPHOS. Conversely, in a hypoxic condition, the OXPHOS is weakened; therefore, the process of glycolysis is enhanced. The balance between OXPHOS and glycolysis helps to maintain cellular energy homeostasis [1].
Aerobic glycolysis is considered a dominant metabolic pathway in activated endothelial, immune, and cancer cells. Most of the glucose is also converted to lactate when oxygen is available (Warburg effect). During the aerobic form of glycolysis, approximately four molecules of ATP are produced per glucose molecule [3]. Despite the fact that ATP production is significantly lower compared to OXPHOS, these cells prefer aerobic glycolysis when glucose is not the limiting factor. If oxygen is available, enzyme pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) converts pyruvate to acetyl-Co-A, which enters the Krebs cycle in the mitochondria. Acetyl-Co-A is then oxidized to carbon dioxide in cellular respiration. During oxidative phosphorylation, 36 molecules of ATP are produced per glucose molecule. In the absence of oxygen, pyruvate is converted to lactate in a process known as anaerobic glycolysis. This conversion is catalysed by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) coupled with NADH to NAD+ oxidation. In anaerobic glycolysis, two molecules of ATP are produced from one molecule of glucose [1].

2. Physiology of the Circadian System

Cellular metabolism, including glucose metabolism, is under strong circadian control. The mammalian circadian system is hierarchically organized with the central oscillator localized in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus that controls peripheral oscillators localized in nearly all cells of the body. Together, they govern 24 h rhythms of behaviour and physiology [6].
At the molecular level, circadian rhythms are generated in a cell-autonomous manner by the transcriptional translational feedback loop (TTFL) (Figure 1), which consists of clock genes whose protein products suppress transcription of other clock genes, resulting in both positive and negative feedback loops. Briefly, protein products of the core clock genes Clock (circadian locomotor output) and Bmal1 (brain and muscle ARNT-like1), which represent a positive arm of the loop, heterodimerize and translocate to the nucleus. Here, they bind to the E-box promoter sequence of target core clock genes Per1 and Per 2 (Period) and Cry1 and Cry 2 (Cryptochrome) and initiate their transcription. PER and CRY proteins accumulate in the cytoplasm, form a complex, and translocate to the nucleus where it interacts with CLOCK/BMAL1 to inhibit its own transcription. The PER/CRY complex is eventually tagged for degradation via phosphorylation, releasing CLOCK/BMAL1 from suppression [7]. This general feedback control mechanism is specific in its duration because it takes approximately (circa) 24 h to complete. It can differ among different individuals, but it has a high repeatability in the same individual of a given age.
Ijms 22 13666 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the transcription-translation feedback loop (TTFL) at the molecular level. First, the regulatory loop is mediated by the proteins CLOCK and BMAL1 that heterodimerize and bind to E-box of several clock genes, including Per, Cry, Rev-erbα, and other genes. The proteins PER and CRY form a complex that inhibits CLOCK and BMAL1 transcription. The activity of the second regulatory loop can be modulated by REV-ERBα, which induces and represses Bmal1 gene expression, respectively. In the third regulatory loop, the activator DBP induces expression of D-box containing clock-controlled genes. The DBP activator is inhibited by NFIL3, whose transcription is regulated by REV-ERBα and RORs. Regulatory loops ensure the rhythmic expression of the core clock genes, which can regulate cellular metabolism, including glycolysis. In this scheme, blue boxes indicate circadian-regulated metabolic genes that exhibit a circadian pattern. Abbreviations: BMAL1—brain and muscle ARNT-like 1; CLOCK—circadian locomotor output; Cry—cryptochrome; DBP—D-box binding protein; D-CCGs—D-box containing clock controlled genes; fructose-1,6-P—fructose 1,6-bisphosphate; fructose-6-P—fructose-6-phosphate; fructose-2,6-BP—fructose-2,6-bisphosphate; glucose-6-P—glucose-6-phosphate GLUT—glucose transporter; NFIL3—nuclear factor interleukin-3 regulated protein; Per—period; REV-ERBα- nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group D member 1; RORE—ROR responsive element; PFKFB3—6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase; PFK-1—phosphofructokinase.
There are several additional regulatory loops that stabilize the basic loop. Moreover, these additional pathways can predominantly determine the tissue specific circadian control of different organs or/and tissues [8]. One of the dominant supporting loops is formed by the nuclear receptor REV-ERBα, a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily (Subfamily 1 group D member 1, NR1D1) and a key circadian clock repressor that inhibits core clock activator Bmal1 transcription 1 [9]. Importantly, Rev-erbα is highly expressed in metabolic tissues, with known functions in conferring circadian clock integration to glucose, lipoprotein, and bile acid metabolism [10]. REV-ERBα suppresses Bmal1 transcription at ROR response elements (RORE) motifs (a nuclear orphan receptor related to the retinoic acid receptor), which is shared with retinoid acid receptor-related orphan receptor alpha (RORα). REV-ERBα represses, whereas RORα activates Bmal1 gene transcription, and this antagonistic regulation elicits a Bmal1 rhythmic oscillation. Moreover, Rev-erbα itself is a direct target of Bmal1, and the REV-ERBα-BMAL1 regulation constitutes a re-enforcing branch that enhances the robustness of the core clock machinery [9]. This loop may play a dominant role in the generation of circadian oscillations in some tissues, such as the liver and immune system, or during some pathophysiological conditions.
Important feedback loops are formed by transcription factors, so-called PAR proline and acidic amino acid-rich–basic leucine zipper proteins, such as DBP (D-box binding protein), HLF (hepatic leukemia factor), and TEF (thyreotropic embryonic factor). The gene encoding PER-1 contains, in the promoter region, a binding domain for DBP (D box) through which DBP stimulates its transcription. The E-box in the regulatory region of the dbp, in turn, mediates regulation of this gene by the BMAL1/CLOCK complex. The transcription factor E4BP4 (NFIL3) inhibits per1 expression and oscillates in an opposite phase to DBP [11]. In this way, DBP can stimulate per1 expression in one phase of a 24-h cycle, while E4BP4 inhibits DBP in the opposite phase, enhancing the stability of oscillations [12].
In addition to transcriptional regulation via E-box and D-box, circadian control of the metabolism is also mediated through interactions with tissue-specific metabolic transcription factors. Among them, a key role in metabolism control is played by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator (PGC1α), a transcriptional coactivator of nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARγ), which is considered a master regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis and function [13]. Transcriptional coactivator PGC-1 alpha integrates the mammalian clock and energy metabolism [14], including OXPHOS. PGC1α and PGC1β stimulate the expression of mitochondrial genes, leading to increased fatty acid β-oxidation, Krebs cycle, and oxidative phosphorylation. Deficiency in PGC1α is followed by attenuated oxidative metabolism; therefore, in skeletal muscle, AMPK still remains activated, reflecting the energy deficit. However, it is still unclear whether a loss of PGC1α in mice leads to a metabolism switch toward glycolysis [15].
Equally important and less understood is the circadian control through post-transcriptional pathways, such as NAD+-dependent protein deacetylation [11], which plays the key role in determining a response to changing nutrient conditions. Indeed, abundant evidence demonstrates a strong connection between peripheral circadian clocks and basal metabolic processes, such as glucose metabolism [16]. However, the precise molecular mechanisms by which the circadian clock controls individual metabolic pathways and responds to nutrients still remain unclear.

3. Circadian Regulation of Glucose Metabolism

The TTFL generates the circadian oscillations in a similar manner in the master circadian clock as in peripheral cells, including the heart, liver, pancreas, muscle, and white adipose tissue. Entrainment of peripheral clocks by the central circadian clock represents a mechanism by which peripheral tissue physiology can be entrained to central timing originating from the SCN [17]. The central oscillator SCN is entrained predominantly by the light/dark cycle, while the feeding/fasting cycle can synchronize peripheral clocks, especially in the liver, in which they control approximately 10% of the transcriptome and have an important role in the circadian alignment of metabolism [18]. Thus, altered timing of food intake in relation to the light:dark cycle can disrupt the synchrony between the brain and peripheral clocks [19] and lead to metabolic dysfunction, such as obesity, glucose intolerance, and cancer [20].
As mentioned above, circadian clocks contribute to the control of crucial metabolic pathways, including glycolysis; therefore, circadian rhythm disruption is associated with metabolic imbalance [21]. Glucose homeostasis is controlled by the hypothalamic clock localized in the SCN and peripheral clocks in the liver, muscle, pancreas, and white adipose tissue. Blood glucose is obtained mainly from the diet during the active phase and mainly from endogenous glucose production in the liver during the resting phase [22].
Glucose uptake shows a 24-h rhythm, with a peak at the beginning of the active phase and the lowest level at the beginning of the passive phase. In nocturnal rodents, the peaks occur in opposite phases than in diurnal humans. Additionally, the 24-h rhythm of glucose uptake corresponds with the glucose concentration in plasma. After the lesion of SCN, the rhythm in glucose uptake and glucose concentration was diminished, and additionally, the rhythm in insulin-dependent tissue sensitivity was eliminated [23]. Therefore, chronodisrupted patients show disruption of rhythms in plasma glucose and insulin levels. Moreover, genetic analyses showed an association between CRY and PER2 and the glucose concentration in the blood [24].
Glucose uptake into the cell depends on the expression of glucose transporters and their trafficking on the cell surface. Corpe and Buran [25] demonstrated that glucose transporter mRNA, among them GLUT-5, GLUT-2, and SGLT-1, exhibits a 24-h rhythm, with the peak occurring before the peak of the feeding rhythm. Expression of intestinal transporters varies on a daily basis, and the peak in SGLT1 activity corresponds with the peak level of the SGLT1 protein. Temporal changes in the Sglt1 mRNA level persisted with a lower amplitude and peak in the ileum in comparison to jejunum [26]. Mice with a muscle-specific clock disruption exhibit impaired glucose uptake, which is probably mediated by the insulin-dependent GLUT4 transporter because its protein level was reduced in this model. Additionally, the level of OXPHOS was reduced and glycolytic intermediates were metabolized inside metabolic pathways because of the decreased activity of pyruvate dehydrogenase [24].
The circadian clock located in hepatocytes plays an important role in the regulation of glucose homeostasis by control of glucose turnover and gluconeogenesis. The level of hepatic glycogen shows daily variations in humans depending on the activity of circadian regulated enzymes [27]. Two enzymes, glycogen synthase and glycogen phosphorylase, are rate-limiting enzymes that control the process of glycogenesis and glycogenolysis. In nocturnal rats, glycogen synthase 2 (GYS2) shows a circadian rhythm with a peak late at night. The activity of GYS2 is modulated by the hormonal signals, including insulin and glucagon as well as glucocorticoids [28]. Circadian expression of Gys2 is regulated through E-box by the transcription factor CLOCK.
Moreover, the activity of glycolytic enzymes shows a circadian oscillation. The expression of the key glycolytic enzyme PFKFB3 at the mRNA and protein level in tongue cancer cells shows circadian oscillations controlled by the transcription factor CLOCK. The peak mRNA levels were achieved in the early light phase between ZT5 and ZT9, and lower levels were achieved between ZT17 and ZT21 [29]. The study with tongue cancer cells confirms that PFKFB3 inhibition at its peak levels significantly decreases cell proliferation and lactate production. Results offer a new insight into the chronopharmacological approach of cancer treatment. Cancer chronotherapy, e.g., administration of anticancer drugs at certain times of the day to reach maximum efficacy and minimum side effects, has been an attractive possibility for long time [30], but large multicenter trials have not produced beneficial outcomes. Therefore, future mechanism-based studies are needed to provide information necessary for devising rational chronochemotherapy regimens [31]. Since growing solid tumours contain different types of cells and are abundantly vascularized, the anticancer chronotherapy targeted on inhibition of glycolysis in proliferating cancer and endothelial cells can represent a useful strategy. Our recent study confirms that the possibility to target metabolic pathways at a specific time may be a promising approach. We found that administration of glycolysis inhibitor 1-(4-pyridinyl)-3-(2-quinolinyl)-2-propen-1-one (PFK15) at different times can result in a significant reduction in the tumour progression [32]. Another study on nude mice with implanted breast tumour cells into the femoral artery proved an increased arterial glucose uptake by tumour cells and lactate concentration in the blood. Increased lactate production reflects a higher level of glycolysis during the passive phase, with peak levels two hours before the lights are off. Additionally, based on the [3H] thymidine incorporation assay, the cell proliferation and number of tumour cells were confirmed to increase during the light phase [33]. Different effects observed after glycolysis inhibition may be related to circadian processes with the peak during the passive phase.
Aerobic glycolysis is considered a main metabolic pathway in brain astrocytes. In human astrocytes, increased expression of CLOCK and BMAL1 is linked with suppression of the protein level of HK1 and LDHA. Moreover, increased BMAL1 expression suppresses the extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) because of attenuated lactate production. Additionally, CLOCK and BMAL1 activation is responsible for caspase-3 mediated apoptosis in human astrocytes. A recent study suggests that reduced glucose metabolism in astrocytes may be associated with Alzheimer’s disease and cognitive dysfunction [21].
The oncoprotein c-MYC is a transcriptional activator involved in the control of cell cycle progression and tumorigenesis and is controlled by the circadian clock [34]. Several studies suggest that clocks can control c-Myc transcription and MYC protein stability. Cryptochromes, as the components of the negative arm of the TTFL were reported to bind to phosphorylated c-MYC, target it to ubiquitylation by FBXL3 and degradation by the proteasome [35]. However, in Cry 1/2 knockout mice, c-Myc transcription and protein levels were depressed and were elevated in BMAL1 knockouts [36]. These authors suggest that c-Myc is a second-order clock-controlled gene regulated through β-catenin, which binds the T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor (TCF/LEF) family of transcription factors resulting in high expression of c-Myc. Further studies are needed to elucidate if the genetic background can affect c-Myc expression and explain the contradictory results. Overexpression of c-Myc results in up-regulated expression of several genes involved in glycolysis, glutaminolysis, and oxidative phosphorylation. In vehicle-treated MYC-OFF U2OS cells, the level of HK1 and HK2 oscillated in phase with glucose consumption. Conversely, in MYC-ON U2OS cells showing the increased activity of MYC, HK2 was induced and did not oscillate. The observed changes are in line with the decrease in MYC-induced BMAL1 and the increase in the PER2 protein level [37].

3.1. Transcription Factors CLOCK and BMAL1

Recently, it was confirmed [38] that the transcription factors CLOCK and BMAL can affect glioma cell proliferation, migration, and metabolic reprogramming. Loss of CLOCK and BMAL affected the glioblastoma cell cycle and apoptosis followed by decreased cell proliferation. In embryonic fibroblasts isolated from mice (MEF) lacking the transcriptional activators CLOCK and BMAL1, decreased FAO and NAD+ concentrations were observed, and conversely, MEF deficient in repressor CRY1 and CRY2 showed increased FAO and NAD+ concentrations. Additionally, Bmal1−/− MEF fibroblasts cultivated in glucose-containing medium released more lactate, indicating a cell dependence on glycolysis. Moreover, the expression of key glycolytic enzymes, including PFK1, increased [39].
Interestingly, in embryonic fibroblasts isolated from Bmal1−/− mice, an elevated glycolysis level and increased lactate production was observed, similar to the metabolic phenotype observed in cancer cells. This metabolic change to the glycolytic phenotype is regulated through the clock-mediated transcriptional regulation of genes encoding glycolytic enzymes [39]. Additionally, the reduced concentration of NAD+ was observed in embryonic fibroblasts due to the downregulated transcription of nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT), an enzyme catalysing the first step in the biosynthesis of NAD. The increased level of NAD is associated with an inflammatory state, including cancer and age-related diseases [40]. Lack of NAD+ supports the shift from OXPHOS to aerobic glycolysis and attenuates lipid oxidation in mitochondria [41]. Moreover, the activity of sirtuins is dependent on NAD+ concentrations. Reduction of the sirtuin 3 (SIRT3) concentration leads to hyperacetylation of mitochondrial enzymes followed by attenuation of oxidative phosphorylation [41].
Key immune system parameters (e.g., cells, hormones, and cytokines) circulating in the blood are under circadian control, exhibit circadian rhythms, and oscillate according to the day-night changes. The metabolism of immune cells can change dynamically according to the presence of cytokines, pathogen molecules, and metabolites [42]. It is assumed that pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) is a transcriptional target of BMAL1 in macrophages; therefore, loss of BMAL1 induces PKM2 expression followed by increased lactate production. Upregulated lactate production due to PKM2-mediated lactate metabolism contributes to the regulation of an inflammatory response and the development of sepsis. In double knockout mice (Bmal1Mye−/−; Pkm2Mye−/− mice), the loss of Pkm2 decreased the lactate level and increased cell survival due to the reduced glycolysis and increased OXPHOS. PKM2 knockout did not affect the expression of Bmal1, Per1, and Per2 mRNA in macrophages isolated from Bmal1Mye−/−; Pkm2Mye−/− mice [43]. Transition of PKM2-dependent aerobic glycolysis to OXPHOS may improve the course of the sepsis.
Circadian clock disruption is related to different disorders, including inflammatory and metabolic diseases. Deng and colleagues [43] confirmed a direct interaction between the circadian system, cell metabolism, and immune system in the development of sepsis. As myeloid cells, e.g., monocytes and macrophages, are a key component of the innate immune response, specific mice with BMAL1 knockout in myeloid cells (Bmal1Mye−/− mice) were generated. Loss of BMAL1 in myeloid cells negatively affected the circadian oscillators in macrophages; however, the BMAL1 protein level in other tissues was unchanged, proving the cell specific knockout in myeloid cells [43]. Additionally, BMAL1 knockout in mice leads to B cell maturation defects and a reduced number of B cells in the circulating blood [44].

3.2. REV-ERBα

Another clock-transcription factor regulating cell metabolism and proliferation is REV-ERB, which participates in glucose and lipid metabolism [45]. REV-ERBα is expressed in tissues such as the liver, adipose tissue, pancreas, and muscle, where it modulates glucose, lipid, and bile acid metabolism, adipogenesis, and the inflammatory response. In mouse hepatocytes and human hepatoma cells, REV-ERBα regulates glucose metabolism through the activity modulation of enzyme glucose-6-posphatase. Moreover, REV-ERBα activation attenuates the level of plasma and cellular glucose [46].
In cancer cell lines, REV-ERBα up-regulation is associated with protooncogene MYC followed by reduced BMAL1 levels and loss of circadian control of glucose metabolism [37]. In glucose metabolism, REV-ERBα inhibits the expression of the rate-limiting enzymes HKII and PFKFB3, thus reducing cell proliferation. REV-ERBα is recruited to the promotor of the human pfkfb3 gene and suppresses its expression. However, this effect was not observed in the promotor of the hkII gene. Gene expression of pfkfb3 and hkII modulated by REV-ERBα is BMAL1 independent but depends on its DNA binding domain (DBD) [47]. Additionally, the use of SR8278, a synthetic REV-ERBα antagonist, reduces the level of glycolysis and raises the intracellular level of lactate [46].

3.3. Transcription Factor HIF

The circadian system reacts not only to the light-dark cycle but also to the rhythmic feeding [19] and oxygen level. Recent studies show that the circadian clock interacts with the transcription factors HIF1α and HIF2α, which are known as oxygen-sensing transcription factors [48]. They are induced by hypoxic conditions and activate the transcription of multiple genes involved in angiogenesis, such as VEGF, hormone erythropoietin stimulating red blood cell formation, glucose transporters (GLUT 1 and GLUT 4), and glycolytic enzymes, such as LDHA [49], pyruvate dehydrogenase [50], and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase [51]. This network is important in several physiological and pathological tumorigenesis conditions. The HIF regulated response is present, for example, in skeletal muscle, in which it activates glucose uptake and lactate production in response to exercise [52]. In cancer tissue, the activated HIF pathway drives angiogenesis in the growing tumour [53]. Numerous studies with knock-out mice demonstrate the interaction between the circadian clock and the HIF pathway [39]. It is expected that BMAL1 and HIFα can directly interact and form a heterodimer, which directly controls the transcriptions of some genes in vitro [54]. However, an indirect mechanism is also plausible because the circadian clock participates in the control of glycolysis, Krebs cycle, fatty acid oxidation, and election transport [55]. Thus, it is possible that the circadian clock is also able to control HIFα activity and stability via control of the metabolism or important signalling metabolites [56]. On the contrary, the relationship between HIF and TTFL can be reciprocal because, in several experimental models, hypoxia can reduce the amplitude of circadian rhythms [57][58] or influence adaptations to circadian phase shifts [59].
HIF-1α and HIF-1β as well as BMAL1 and CLOCK are members of the transcription factor family bHLH-PAS, sharing structural similarities. These factors can respond to physiological as well as environmental signals. Interactions between circadian clocks and hypoxia were identified in previous works [48] (Figure 2). It was confirmed that HIF-1 can contribute to the expression of per2 and cry1 genes. As a heterodimer, HIF-1α and BMAL1 can bind to the E-box and increase expression of HIF-1 target genes. HIF-1α can bind directly to the E-box of some circadian genes. In human bone osteosarcoma epithelial cells (U2OS), interaction between HIF-1α and BMAL1 increases the expression of per2 except for the HIF-1 target genes. In turn, the transcription factors CLOCK and BMAL1 may promote the expression of the HIF-1α gene [54].
Ijms 22 13666 g002 550
Figure 2. Crosstalk between HIF-1, circadian clocks, and glycolysis. (A) Under a normoxic condition, HIF-1α is ubiquitinated and degraded. In a hypoxia condition, HIF-1α translocates to the nucleus, binds to the HIF-1β and p300, and forms the HIF complex. This complex binds to hypoxia-response elements (HRE) and regulates the expression of glucose transporters and glycolytic enzymes. (B) HIF can interact with circadian pathways. CLOCK can interact with HIF-1β and p300 and binds to HRE. Additionally, HIF-1α can colocalize with BMAL1 to increase the expression of HIF- and clock-controlled genes. (C) Schematic representation of glycolytic metabolism regulated by the HIF-1α factor. Red boxes indicate gene expression regulated by HIF-1α. Pyruvate can be metabolized into lactate in a hypoxic condition (anaerobic glycolysis) or a condition of sufficient oxygen (aerobic glycolysis). In the process of OXPHOS, pyruvate is metabolized to Acetyl-CoA. Abbreviations: BMAL1—brain and muscle ARNT-like 1; CLOCK—circadian locomotor output; GLUT—glucose transporter; glyceraldehyde-3-P—glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; HRE—hormone responsive element; HIF—hypoxia inducible factor; PFKFB3—6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase; PFK-1—phosphofructokinase; fructose-1,6-P—fructose 1,6-bisphosphate; fructose-6-P—fructose-6-phosphate; fructose-2,6-BP—fructose-2,6-bisphosphate; glucose-6-P—glucose-6-phosphate; OXPHOS—oxidative phosphorylation; PDH—pyruvate dehydrogenase; PDK1—pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1.
Under a normoxic condition, increased expression of genes related with anaerobic glycolysis and lactate production was documented in the Bmal1−/− liver. Interestingly, in Bmal1−/− myotubes, lactate production and HIF-1α gene expression were reduced. In myotubes, an extracellular medium acidification rate (ECAR) showed circadian rhythmicity with an opposing phase to the rhythms of fatty acid oxidation. This observation indicates that glycolytic and oxidative metabolism are clock-controlled in skeletal muscle [60].
M1 macrophage activation induces BMAL1 mRNA and protein expression, with a peak 12 h after stimulation. BMAL1 may affect the activation of macrophages through direct interaction with HIF-1α. Both BMAL1 and HIF-1α regulate different metabolic pathways, while HIF-1α predominantly regulates aerobic glycolysis and BMAL1 regulates metabolism toward oxidative phosphorylation [42]. In macrophages, mitochondrial production of reactive oxygen species can be enhanced by succinate dehydrogenase after loss of BMAL1 function, followed by HIF-1α stabilization, which contributes to tissue inflammatory damage [61]. Additionally, loss of BMAL1 function induces higher expression of genes encoding plasma membrane transporters for amino acids and enzymes involved in the breakdown of amino acids, leading to metabolic reprogramming toward catabolism of amino acids. On the other hand, HIF-1α induces expression of enzyme LDHA and arginase 1 (Arg1) [42].

3.4. Melatonin

There are several lines of evidence that metabolic changes toward the glycolytic phenotype can be influenced by circadian melatonin production. Melatonin can contribute, through the inhibition of HIF-1α, to the down-regulation of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase, which inhibits the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex catalysing the conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA. Therefore, pyruvate is metabolized in the cell cytoplasm to lactate, and other metabolic pathways, such as the pentose phosphate pathway, are upregulated. Additionally, melatonin contributes to the conversion of proinflammatory M1 macrophages to anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages followed by changes in the glucose metabolism (from aerobic glycolysis to oxidative phosphorylation) [62]. This indicates that melatonin can also modulate metabolism in non-cancer cells.
During the daytime, xenografted human mammary cancer cells in rats showed the Warburg phenotype characterized by an increased glucose uptake and glucose metabolism. However, at night, these cells preferred oxidative phosphorylation. The day-night difference was not observed in cultured cancer cells, which were not exposed to the rhythmic melatonin condition. It is assumed that changes in melatonin levels in rats exposed to light at night were responsible for the metabolic alterations observed in these cells. Mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation did not occur, and glucose metabolism was also observed during the nighttime. After changes in the melatonin level, cells display aerobic glycolysis during the day and night [33].

References

  1. Zheng, J. Energy Metabolism of Cancer: Glycolysis versus Oxidative Phosphorylation (Review). Oncol. Lett. 2012, 4, 1151–1157.
  2. Kalucka, J.; Missiaen, R.; Georgiadou, M.; Schoors, S.; Lange, C.; de Bock, K.; Dewerchin, M.; Carmeliet, P. Metabolic Control of the Cell Cycle. Cell Cycle 2015, 14, 3379–3388.
  3. Akram, M. Mini-Review on Glycolysis and Cancer. J. Cancer Educ. 2013, 28, 454–457.
  4. de Bock, K.; Georgiadou, M.; Carmeliet, P. Role of Endothelial Cell Metabolism in Vessel Sprouting. Cell Metab. 2013, 18, 634–647.
  5. Clem, B.; Telang, S.; Clem, A.; Yalcin, A.; Meier, J.; Simmons, A.; Rasku, M.A.; Arumugam, S.; Dean, W.L.; Eaton, J.; et al. Small-Molecule Inhibition of 6-Phosphofructo-2-Kinase Activity Suppresses Glycolytic Flux and Tumor Growth. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2008, 7, 110–120.
  6. Dibner, C.; Schibler, U.; Albrecht, U. The Mammalian Circadian Timing System: Organization and Coordination of Central and Peripheral Clocks. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2010, 72, 517–549.
  7. Takahashi, J.S. Transcriptional Architecture of the Mammalian Circadian Clock. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2017, 18, 164–179.
  8. Morris, A.R.; Stanton, D.L.; Roman, D.; Liu, A.C. Systems Level Understanding of Circadian Integration with Cell Physiology. J. Mol. Biol. 2020, 432, 3547–3564.
  9. Preitner, N.; Damiola, F.; Lopez-Molina, L.; Zakany, J.; Duboule, D.; Albrecht, U.; Schibler, U. Erratum: The Orphan Nuclear Receptor REV-ERBα Controls Circadian Transcription within the Positive Limb of the Mammalian Circadian Oscillator. Cell 2002, 110, 251–260.
  10. Yin, L.; Wu, N.; Lazar, M.A. Nuclear Receptor Rev-Erbalpha: A Heme Receptor That Coordinates Circadian Rhythm and Metabolism. Nucl. Recept. Signal. 2010, 8, nrs-08001.
  11. Asher, G.; Schibler, U. Crosstalk between Components of Circadian and Metabolic Cycles in Mammals. Cell Metab. 2011, 13, 125–137.
  12. Gutierrez, D.; Arbesman, J. Circadian Dysrhythmias, Physiological Aberrations, and the Link to Skin Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 621.
  13. Liang, H.; Ward, W.F. PGC-1α: A Key Regulator of Energy Metabolism. Am. J. Physiol.-Adv. Physiol. Educ. 2006, 30, 145–151.
  14. Liu, C.; Li, S.; Liu, T.; Borjigin, J.; Lin, J.D. Transcriptional Coactivator PGC-1α Integrates the Mammalian Clock and Energy Metabolism. Nature 2007, 447, 477–481.
  15. Lin, J.; Handschin, C.; Spiegelman, B.M. Metabolic Control through the PGC-1 Family of Transcription Coactivators. Cell Metab. 2005, 1, 361–370.
  16. Reinke, H.; Asher, G. Crosstalk between Metabolism and Circadian Clocks. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019, 20, 227–241.
  17. Astiz, M.; Heyde, I.; Oster, H. Mechanisms of Communication in the Mammalian Circadian Timing System. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 343.
  18. Bass, J.; Lazar, M.A. Circadian time signature of fitness anddisease. Science 2016, 354, 994–999.
  19. Hatori, M.; Vollmers, C.; Zarrinpar, A.; DiTacchio, L.; Bushong, E.A.; Gill, S.; Leblanc, M.; Chaix, A.; Joens, M.; Fitzpatrick, J.A.J.; et al. Time-Restricted Feeding without Reducing Caloric Intake Prevents Metabolic Diseases in Mice Fed a High-Fat Diet. Cell Metab. 2012, 15, 848–860.
  20. Arble, D.M.; Bass, J.; Laposky, A.D.; Vitaterna, M.H.; Turek, F.W. Circadian Timing of Food Intake Contributes to Weight Gain. Obesity 2009, 17, 2100–2102.
  21. Yoo, I.D.; Woo Park, M.; Woo Cha, H.; Yoon, S.; Boonpraman, N.; Yi, S.S.; Moon, J.-S. Elevated CLOCK and BMAL1 Contribute to the Impairment of Aerobic Glycolysis from Astrocytes in Alzheimer’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7862.
  22. Kalsbeek, A.; la Fleur, S.; Fliers, E. Circadian Control of Glucose Metabolism. Mol. Metab. 2014, 3, 372–383.
  23. la Fleur, S.E.; Kalsbeek, A.; Wortel, J.; Fekkes, M.L.; Buijs, R.M. A Daily Rhythm in Glucose Tolerance. Diabetes 2001, 50, 1237–1243.
  24. Gachon, F.; Loizides-Mangold, U.; Petrenko, V.; Dibner, C. Glucose Homeostasis: Regulation by Peripheral Circadian Clocks in Rodents and Humans. Endocrinology 2017, 158, 1074–1084.
  25. Corpe, C.P.; Burant, C.F. Hexose Transporter Expression in Rat Small Intestine: Effect of Diet on Diurnal Variations. Am. J. Physiol.-Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 1996, 271, G211–G216.
  26. Balakrishnan, A.; Stearns, A.T.; Rounds, J.; Irani, J.; Giuffrida, M.; Rhoads, D.B.; Ashley, S.W.; Tavakkolizadeh, A. Diurnal Rhythmicity in Glucose Uptake Is Mediated by Temporal Periodicity in the Expression of the Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter (SGLT1). Surgery 2008, 143, 813–818.
  27. Bailey, S.M.; Udoh, U.S.; Young, M.E. Circadian Regulation of Metabolism. J. Endocrinol. 2014, 222, 1–35.
  28. Doi, R.; Oishi, K.; Ishida, N. CLOCK Regulates Circadian Rhythms of Hepatic Glycogen Synthesis through Transcriptional Activation of Gys2. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 22114–22121.
  29. Chen, L.; Zhao, J.; Tang, Q.; Li, H.; Zhang, C.; Yu, R.; Zhao, Y.; Huo, Y.; Wu, C. PFKFB3 Control of Cancer Growth by Responding to Circadian Clock Outputs. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–12.
  30. Levi, F.; Schibler, U. Circadian Rhythms: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2007, 47, 593–628.
  31. Yang, Y.; Lindsey-boltz, L.A.; Vaughn, C.M.; Selby, C.P.; Cao, X.; Liu, Z.; Hsu, D.S.; Sancar, A. Circadian Clock, Carcinogenesis, Chronochemotherapy Connections. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 297, 101068.
  32. Horváthová, J.; Moravčík, R.; Matúšková, M.; Šišovský, V.; Boháč, A.; Zeman, M. Inhibition of Glycolysis Suppresses Cell Proliferation and Tumor Progression in Vivo: Perspectives for Chronotherapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4390.
  33. Blask, D.E.; Dauchy, R.T.; Dauchy, E.M.; Mao, L.; Hill, S.M.; Greene, M.W.; Belancio, V.P.; Sauer, L.A.; Davidson, L. Light Exposure at Night Disrupts Host/Cancer Circadian Regulatory Dynamics: Impact on the Warburg Effect, Lipid Signaling and Tumor Growth Prevention. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e102776.
  34. Shostak, A.; Ruppert, B.; Ha, N.; Bruns, P.; Toprak, U.H.; Eils, R.; Schlesner, M.; Diernfellner, A.; Brunner, M. MYC/MIZ1-Dependent Gene Repression Inversely Coordinates the Circadian Clock with Cell Cycle and Proliferation. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 1–11.
  35. Huber, A.L.; Papp, S.J.; Chan, A.B.; Henriksson, E.; Jordan, S.D.; Kriebs, A.; Nguyen, M.; Wallace, M.; Li, Z.; Metallo, C.M.; et al. CRY2 and FBXL3 Cooperatively Degrade C-MYC. Mol. Cell 2016, 64, 774–789.
  36. Liu, Z.; Selby, C.P.; Yang, Y.; Lindsey-Boltz, L.A.; Cao, X.; Eynullazada, K.; Sancar, A. Circadian Regulation of C-MYC in Mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 21609–21617.
  37. Altman, B.J.; Hsieh, A.L.; Sengupta, A.; Krishnanaiah, S.Y.; Stine, Z.E.; Walton, Z.E.; Gouw, A.M.; Venkataraman, A.; Li, B.; Goraksha-Hicks, P.; et al. MYC Disrupts the Circadian Clock and Metabolism in Cancer Cells. Cell Metab. 2015, 22, 1009–1019.
  38. Shen, H.; Cook, K.; Gee, H.E.; Hau, E. Hypoxia, Metabolism, and the Circadian Clock: New Links to Overcome Radiation Resistance in High-Grade Gliomas. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 39, 1–14.
  39. Peek, C.B. Metabolic Implications of Circadian–HIF Crosstalk. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 31, 459–468.
  40. Audrito, V.; Messana, V.G.; Deaglio, S. NAMPT and NAPRT: Two Metabolic Enzymes With Key Roles in Inflammation. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 358.
  41. Kinouchi, K.; Sassone-Corsi, P. Metabolic Rivalry: Circadian Homeostasis and Tumorigenesis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2020, 20, 645–661.
  42. Alexander, R.K.; Liou, Y.H.; Knudsen, N.H.; Starost, K.A.; Xu, C.; Hyde, A.L.; Liu, S.; Jacobi, D.; Liao, N.S.; Lee, C.H. Bmal1 Integrates Mitochondrial Metabolism and Macrophage Activation. eLife 2020, 9, 1–28.
  43. Deng, W.; Zhu, S.; Zeng, L.; Liu, J.; Kang, R.; Yang, M.; Cao, L.; Wang, H.; Billiar, T.R.; Jiang, J.; et al. The Circadian Clock Controls Immune Checkpoint Pathway in Sepsis. Cell Rep. 2018, 24, 366–378.
  44. Sun, Y.; Yang, Z.; Niu, Z.; Peng, J.; Li, Q.; Xiong, W.; Langnas, A.N.; Ma, M.Y.; Zhao, Y. MOP3, a Component of the Molecular Clock, Regulates the Development of B Cells. Immunology 2006, 119, 451–460.
  45. Ramakrishnan, S.N.; Lau, P.; Burke, L.J.; Muscat, G.E.O. Rev-Erbβ Regulates the Expression of Genes Involved in Lipid Absorption in Skeletal Muscle Cells: Evidence for Cross-Talk between Orphan Nuclear Receptors and Myokines. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 8651–8659.
  46. Wang, S.; Li, F.; Lin, Y.; Wu, B. Targeting REV-ERBα for Therapeutic Purposes: Promises and Challenges. Theranostics 2020, 10, 4168–4182.
  47. Tao, L.; Yu, H.; Liang, R.; Jia, R.; Wang, J.; Jiang, K.; Wang, Z. Rev-Erbα Inhibits Proliferation by Reducing Glycolytic Flux and Pentose Phosphate Pathway in Human Gastric Cancer Cells. Oncogenesis 2019, 8, 1–8.
  48. Bersten, D.C.; Sullivan, A.E.; Peet, D.J.; Whitelaw, M.L. BHLH–PAS Proteins in Cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2013, 13, 827–841.
  49. Park, H.S.; Kim, J.H.; Sun, B.K.; Song, S.U.; Suh, W.; Sung, J.H. Hypoxia Induces Glucose Uptake and Metabolism of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2016, 14, 4706–4714.
  50. Menk, A.V.; Scharping, N.E.; Moreci, R.S.; Zeng, X.; Guy, C.; Salvatore, S.; Bae, H.; Xie, J.; Young, H.A.; Wendell, S.G.; et al. Early TCR Signaling Induces Rapid Aerobic Glycolysis Enabling Distinct Acute T Cell Effector Functions. Cell Rep. 2018, 22, 1509–1521.
  51. Semenza, G.L.; Roth, P.H.; Fang, H.M.; Wang, G.L. Transcriptional Regulation of Genes Encoding Glycolytic Enzymes by Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 23757–23763.
  52. Mason, S.; Johnson, R.S. The Role of HIF-1 in Hypoxic Response in the Skeletal Muscle. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2007, 618, 229–244.
  53. Ryan, H.E.; Lo, J.; Johnson, R.S. HIF-1 Alpha Is Required for solid tumor formation and embryonic vascularization. EMBO J. 1998, 17, 3005–3015.
  54. Morgan, M.N.; Dvuchbabny, S.; Martinez, C.-A.; Kerr, B.; Cistulli, P.A.; Cook, K.M. The Cancer Clock Is (Not) Ticking: Links between Circadian Rhythms and Cancer. Clocks Sleep 2019, 1, 435–458.
  55. Wu, Y.; Tang, D.; Liu, N.; Xiong, W.; Huang, H.; Li, Y.; Ma, Z.; Zhao, H.; Chen, P.; Qi, X.; et al. Reciprocal Regulation between the Circadian Clock and Hypoxia Signaling at the Genome Level in Mammals. Cell Metab. 2017, 25, 73–85.
  56. Chandel, N.S.; McClintock, D.S.; Feliciano, C.E.; Wood, T.M.; Melendez, J.A.; Rodriguez, A.M.; Schumacker, P.T. Reactive Oxygen Species Generated at Mitochondrial Complex III Stabilize Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α during Hypoxia: A Mechanism of O2 Sensing. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 25130–25138.
  57. Chilov, D.; Hofer, T.; Bauer, C.; Wenger, R.H.; Gassmann, M. Hypoxia Affects Expression of Circadian Genes PER1 and CLOCK in Mouse Brain. FASEB J. 2001, 15, 2613–2622.
  58. Ghorbel, M.T.; Coulson, J.M.; Murphy, D. Cross-Talk between Hypoxic and Circadian Pathways: Cooperative Roles for Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1α and CLOCK in Transcriptional Activation of the Vasopressin Gene. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2003, 22, 396–404.
  59. Adamovich, Y.; Ladeuix, B.; Golik, M.; Koeners, M.P.; Asher, G. Rhythmic Oxygen Levels Reset Circadian Clocks through HIF1α. Cell Metab. 2017, 25, 93–101.
  60. Peek, C.B.; Levine, D.C.; Cedernaes, J.; Taguchi, A.; Kobayashi, Y.; Tsai, S.J.; Bonar, N.A.; McNulty, M.R.; Ramsey, K.M.; Bass, J. Circadian Clock Interaction with HIF1α Mediates Oxygenic Metabolism and Anaerobic Glycolysis in Skeletal Muscle. Cell Metab. 2017, 25, 86–92.
  61. Mills, E.L.; Kelly, B.; Logan, A.; Costa, A.S.H.; Varma, M.; Bryant, C.E.; Tourlomousis, P.; Däbritz, J.H.M.; Gottlieb, E.; Latorre, I.; et al. Succinate Dehydrogenase Supports Metabolic Repurposing of Mitochondria to Drive Inflammatory Macrophages. Cell 2016, 167, 457–470.e13.
  62. Reiter, R.J.; Sharma, R.; Ma, Q. Switching Diseased Cells from Cytosolic Aerobic Glycolysis to Mitochondrial Oxidative Phosphorylation: A Metabolic Rhythm Regulated by Melatonin? J. Pineal Res. 2021, 70, 1–4.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Jana Zlacká
,
Michal Zeman
View Times: 706
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 12 Jan 2022
Table of Contents
Academic Video Service
Feedback